Treatment of benign biliary strictures in chronic pancreatitis by self-expandable metal stents

AIM: To determine the efficacy the value of self-expandable metal stents in patients with benign biliary strictures caused by chronic pancreatitis. METHOD: 61 patients with symptomatic common bile duct strictures caused by alcoholic chronic pancreatitis were treated by interventional endoscopy. RESULTS: Initial endoscopic drainage was successful in all cases, with complete resolution of obstructive jaundice. Of 45 patients who needed definitive therapy after a 12-months interval of interventional endoscopy, 12 patients were treated with repeated plastic stent insertion (19.7%) or by surgery (n = 30; 49.2%). In 3 patients a self-expandable metal stent was inserted into the common bile duct (4.9%). In patients treated with metal stents, no symptoms of biliary obstruction occurred during a mean follow-up period of 37 (range 18-53) months. The long-term success rate of treatment with metal stents was 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of biliary obstruction by self-expandable metal stents provides excellent long-term results. To identify patients who benefit most from self-expandable metal stent insertion, further, prospective randomized studies are necessary.     

Benign biliary strictures: Endoscopic management

Over the past 2 decades, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with stricture dilation and stent placement has gradually become the first-line treatment modality for the vast majority of benign biliary strictures (BBSs). Stricture remediation with progressive placement of multiple plastic stents with 3 months interval stent exchange during a period of one year has excellent long-term results in patients with postoperative BBSs. Covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) are a reasonable alternative to multiple plastic stenting, especially in patients with chronic pancreatitis. The use of covered SEMS should be limited to carefully selected cases of postoperative BBSs. Uncovered SEMS are contraindicated for any type of BBSs. Understanding of the etiology and exclusion of malignancy is essential for optimal treatment in some types of biliary strictures, especially in the case of autoimmune cholangiopathy and primary sclerosing cholangitis.     

Benign biliary strictures: current endoscopic management

Endoscopic treatment is the mainstay of therapy for benign billiary strictures, and surgery is reserved for selected patients in whom endoscopic treatment fails or is not feasible. The endoscopic approach depends mainly on stricture etiology and location, and generally involves the placement of one or multiple plastic stents, dilation of the stricture(s), or a combination of these approaches. Knowledge of biliary anatomy, endoscopy experience and a well-equipped endoscopy unit are necessary for the success of endoscopic treatment. This Review discusses the etiologies of benign biliary strictures and different endoscopic therapies and their respective outcomes. Data on newer therapies, such as the placement of self-expandable metal stents, and the treatment of biliary-enteric anastomotic strictures is also reviewed.     

Efficacy of multiple biliary stenting for refractory benign biliary strictures due to chronic calcifying pancreatitis

AIM To investigate endoscopic therapy efficacy for refractory benign biliary strictures(BBS) with multiple biliary stenting and clarify predictors.METHODS Ten consecutive patients with stones in the pancreatic head and BBS due to chronic pancreatitis who underwent endoscopic therapy were evaluated. Endoscopic insertion of a single stent failed in all patients. We used plastic stents(7F, 8.5F, and 10F) and increased stents at intervals of 2 or 3 mo. Stents were removed approximately 1 year after initial stenting. BBS and common bile duct(CBD) diameter were evaluated using cholangiography. Patients were followed for ≥ 6 mo after therapy, interviewed for cholestasis symptoms, and underwent liver function testing every visit. Patients with complete and incomplete stricture dilations were compared.RESULTS Endoscopic therapy was completed in 8(80%) patients, whereas 2(20%) patients could not continue therapy because of severe acute cholangitis and abdominal abscess, respectively. The mean number of stents was 4.1 ± 1.2. In two(20%) patients, BBS did not improve; thus, a biliary stent was inserted. BBS improved in six(60%) patients. CBD diameter improved more significantly in the complete group than in the incomplete group(6.1 ± 1.8 mm vs 13.7 ± 2.2 mm, respectively, P = 0.010). Stricture length was significantly associated with complete stricture dilation(complete group; 20.5 ± 3.0 mm, incomplete group; 29.0 ± 5.1 mm, P = 0.011). Acute cholangitis did not recur during the mean follow-up period of 20.6 ± 7.3 mo.CONCLUSION Sequential endoscopic insertion of multiple stents is effective for refractory BBS caused by chronic calcifying pancreatitis. BBS length calculation can improve patient selection procedure for therapy.     

Plastic or metal stents for benign extrahepatic biliary strictures: a systematic review

Background  

Benign biliary strictures may be a consequence of surgical procedures, chronic pancreatitis or iatrogenic injuries to the ampulla. Stents are increasingly being used for this indication, however it is not completely clear which stent type should be preferred.     

Covered metal stent or multiple plastic stents for refractory pancreatic ductal strictures in chronic pancreatitis: A systematic review

Background and aimsRefractory chronic pancreatitis has been proposed as a challenge for endoscopists following routine single plastic stenting. However, data on the efficacy and safety of further endoscopic stenting are still controversial. The current systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of placement of fully covered self-expandable metal stent (FCSEMS) and multiple plastic stents.MethodsDatabases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and WANFANG Database were used to search relevant trials. Published studies were assessed by using well-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The process was independently performed by two investigators.ResultsA total of 5 studies provided data of 80 patients. Forest plots and publication bias were not carried out because few studies were relevant and screened studies were all case series. The technical success rate was 100% both in placement of FCSEMS and multiple plastic stents. The functional success rate after placement of FCSEMS was 100%, followed by multiple plastic stents (94.7%). Complications occurred 26.2% after FCSEMS placement, which was not described in detail in multiple plastic stents. The stent migration rate was 8.2% for FCSEMS and 10.5% for multiple plastic stents. Reintervention rate was 9.8% for FCSEMS and 15.8% for multiple plastic stents. Pain improvement rate was 85.2% for FCSEMS and 84.2% for multiple plastic stents.ConclusionsFCSEMS appeared to be no significant difference with multiple plastic stents in treatment of refractory chronic pancreatitis. We need to develop more investigations.     

Benign biliary strictures treated with biodegradable stents in patients with surgically altered anatomy using double balloon enteroscopy

Abstract

Objectives

Surgically altered anatomy complicates endoscopical procedures of pancreatobiliary tree. Biliary or hepaticojejunal anastomosis strictures have been managed using percutaneous transhepatic or double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) techniques with multiple plastic stents, or fully covered self-expandable metal stents. We report the first seven cases with surgically altered anatomy treated with biodegradable stents with DBE.     

Fully covered self-expanding metal stents for benign refractory pancreatic duct strictures in chronic pancreatitis

Background: Pancreatic duct (PD) stricture is a common adverse event in chronic pancreatitis (CP). Primary treatment for refractory PD strictures is endotherapy (ET), including the insertion of multiple plastic stents. In addition, fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FC-SEMSs) have also been successfully used. More long-term studies are necessary to clarify the complication rate and efficiency, however.

Methods: This retrospective study was comprised of 17 patients with symptomatic CP and refractory fibrotic main pancreatic duct (MPD) stricture treated with FC-SEMSs between 2010–2018 at the Helsinki University Hospital. Treated strictures were located in the pancreatic head. Technical success was defined as the accurate positioning of the stent and resolution of the MPD stricture. Clinical success was defined as pain relief at the end of the follow-up.

Results: In 12 patients (71%), stricture resolution was accomplished. Clinical success was achieved in 12 patients (71%). The median duration of stenting was 169 days (range 15–804). Ten patients (58.8%) underwent a follow-up of two years or more. Early complications (≤7 days) occurred in two patients (12%): one pancreatitis and one cholestasis. Late complications (≥7 days) included severe abdominal pain (n?=?2, 12%), pancreatitis (n?=?3, 18%), cholestasis (n?=?1, 6%) and stent migration (n?=?7, 35%). Significant differences in stricture resolution and pain improvement were evident in patients with stent migration compared to patients without stent migration [1(14.3%) vs. 11(84.6%), p?=?.004 and 2(28.6%) vs. 11(84.6%), p?=?.022].

Conclusion: FC-SEMS placement is a safe and potentially effective treatment for this challenging group of patients. However, stent migration appears to affect the clinical and technical outcome.     

Fully-covered, self-expandable metal stents (CSEMS) in malignant distal biliary strictures: mid-term evaluation

Background and Aims: Limited data exist regarding fully‐covered, self‐expandable metal stents (CSEMS) with anchoring fins for the management of malignant distal biliary strictures. The aim of this study is to evaluate their safety and patency. Methods: Over a period of 2 years, 70 patients (45 males, 66 ± 13 years) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with placement of a 10‐mm (67 patients) or 8‐mm diameter (3 patients) CSEMS for the palliation of distal malignant biliary obstruction (pancreatic [53] or other [17]). Data were collected prospectively for survival and stent patency; complications were evaluated retrospectively. Results: After CSEMS placement, 17 patients proceeded to surgery, and 53 patients were deemed unresectable. Mean survival for non‐surgical candidates was 180 days (range: 15–1091), and 170 days (range: 9–589) for patients who underwent surgical management. CSEMS were left in place and remained patent for a mean of 163 days (range: 15–1091) in non‐surgical candidates, and a mean of 55 days (range: 5–126) in surgical candidates. Complications during placement included wire perforations (4) and proximal deployment requiring repositioning (4), one of which was complicated by a bile leak. Post‐procedure complications were observed in 24 cases (34%) and included post‐ERCP pancreatitis (8, with 2 of them severe), post‐procedure pain (5, with 3 requiring admission), cholecystitis (3), stent occlusion (3), cholangitis (2), proximal migration (1), post‐sphincterotomy bleeding (1), and sepsis leading to death (1). Conclusion: CSEMS appear to provide acceptable short‐term patency rates; however, their limited long‐term patency and high complication rate might limit their widespread use. Further long‐term prospective data are required to confirm this observation.     

自膨式金属支架治疗远端胆管恶性狭窄优于塑料支架

【据Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2020年12月报道】题:自膨式金属支架治疗远端胆管恶性狭窄优于塑料支架(作者Jang S等)经内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)引导下放置支架治疗胆管恶性狭窄是非常有效的。来自克利夫兰诊所的Jang等进行了一项队列研究,比较了塑料支架(PS)和自膨式金属支架(SEMS)的疗效及不良结局。     

Risk factors for failure of endoscopic stenting of biliary strictures in chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to investigate the value of interventional endoscopy in patients with strictures of the common bile duct (CBD) caused by chronic pancreatitis (CP), and to define the subset of patients who may be at risk for failure of endoscopic intervention, in a prospective follow-up study. METHODS: A total of 61 patients with symptomatic CBD strictures caused by alcoholic CP were treated by endoscopic stent insertion for 1 yr with scheduled stent changes every 3 months. After the treatment period, all patients entered a follow-up program. RESULTS: Initial endoscopic drainage was successful in all cases, with complete resolution of obstructive jaundice. After 1 yr from the initial stent insertion, in 19 patients (31.1%) the obstruction was resolved, and stents were removed without any need of additional procedures. During a median follow-up of 40 months (range 18-66 months), 16 patients had no recurrence of symptomatic CBD stricture (long term success rate 26.2%). Of 45 patients who needed definitive therapy, 12 patients (19.7%) were treated with repeated plastic stent insertion and three (4.9%) with insertion of a metal stent, and 30 patients (49.2%) underwent surgery. Among the variables tested, calcification of the pancreatic head was the only factor that was found to be of prognostic value. Of 39 patients with calcification of the pancreatic head, only three (7.7%) were successfully treated by a 1-yr period of plastic stent therapy, whereas in 13 of 22 patients (59.1%) without calcification, this treatment was successful (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic drainage of biliary obstruction provides excellent short term but only moderate long term results. Patients without calcifications of the pancreatic head benefit from biliary stenting. Patients with calcifications were identified to have a 17-fold (95% CI=4-74) increased risk of failure of a 12 month course of endoscopic stenting.     

Expandable metal stents in chronic pancreatitis

BackgroundBiliary obstruction in chronic pancreatitis may be relieved by the insertion of a biliary endoprosthesis. Stenting is usually achieved with a plastic device, but self-expandable metal stents may also be used.Case outlinesTwo patients are described with severe chronic pancreatitis complicated by biliary obstruction and portal vein thrombosis, who underwent insertion of metallic biliary endoprostheses. In both patients the endoprostheses became occluded, at 12 and 7 months respectively, which necessitated open operation. Both patients experienced surgical complications and one patient died postoperatively.DiscussionThe use of metal endoprostheses in chronic pancreatitis may result in occlusion, necessitating open operation. Such stents should be used with caution in these patients, who are likely to be high-risk surgical candidates.     

Uncovered Hanaro Versus Luminex metal stents for palliation of malignant biliary strictures

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic stent insertion is the optimum method of palliation for malignant biliary obstruction. Various types of self-expanding metal stents have been introduced in the market. Whether one type of stents is superior to the others in terms of stent patency remains undefined. GOALS: This randomized trial compared 2 uncovered metal stents with similar technical characteristics, but significant cost difference, in the palliation of inoperable malignant biliary strictures. STUDY: Ninety-two patients with inoperable biliary obstruction were randomized to receive either a 10-mm diameter Hanaro or Luminex uncovered metal stent. The duration of stent patency, the overall patient survival, the mechanism of stent occlusion, and the adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients were included in the analysis; 44 received Hanaro stents and 45 Luminex stents. The overall median patency rates between the 2 stents did not differ (328 d for the Hanaro vs. 289 d for the Luminex stent; P=0.815). Similarly, no difference was found between the overall median survival rates by the 2 stents (347 d for the Hanaro vs. 307 d for the Luminex stent; P=0.654). Two major procedure-related complications occurred, perforation (Hanaro stent) and proximal stent migration (Luminex stent). Stent occlusion requiring reintervention occurred in 25 patients (11 with the Hanaro vs. 14 with the Luminex stent; P=0.521). CONCLUSIONS: The 2 uncovered metal stents are comparable in terms of placement, occlusion rates, overall stent patency, and patient survival; Hanaro stent insertion, however, seems to be a cost-saving strategy at least in Greece.