CB1 cannabinoid receptor ligands

The CB1 receptor is expressed in the central nervous system and numerous other tissues including heart, lung and uterus and has been recognized as an important therapeutic target for pain, appetite modulation, glaucoma, multiple sclerosis and other indications. An interesting feature of this GPCR is its ability to be activated by a number of structurally different classes of compounds, thus, raising the possibility of multiple activated forms of the receptor. Understanding of the structure-activity relationships of cannabinergic ligands has paved the road for the development of novel ligands exhibiting receptor subtype selectivity and efficacy. This review highlights the important CB1 cannabinergic ligands developed to date.     

Allosteric modulation of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor

We investigated the pharmacology of three novel compounds, Org 27569 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-(4-piperidin-1-yl-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), Org 27759 (3-ethyl-5-fluoro-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid [2-94-dimethylamino-phenyl)-ethyl]-amide), and Org 29647 (5-chloro-3-ethyl-1H-indole-2-carboxylic acid (1-benzyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-amide, 2-enedioic acid salt), at the cannabinoid CB1 receptor. In equilibrium binding assays, the Org compounds significantly increased the binding of the CB1 receptor agonist [3H]CP 55,940 [(1R,3R,4R)-3-[2-hydroxy-4-(1,1-dimethylheptyl)phenyl]-4-(3-hydroxypropyl)cyclohexan-1-ol], indicative of a positively cooperative allosteric effect. The same compounds caused a significant, but incomplete, decrease in the specific binding of the CB1 receptor inverse agonist [3H]SR 141716A [N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride], indicative of a limited negative binding cooperativity. Analysis of the data according to an allosteric ternary complex model revealed that the estimated affinity of each Org compound was not significantly different when the radioligand was [3H]CP 55,940 or [3H]SR 141716A. However, the estimated cooperatively factor for the interaction between modulator and radioligand was greater than 1 when determined against [3H]CP 55,940 and less than 1 when determined against [3H]SR 141716A. [3H]CP 55,940 dissociation kinetic studies also validated the allosteric nature of the Org compounds, because they all significantly decreased radioligand dissociation. These data suggest that the Org compounds bind allosterically to the CB1 receptor and elicit a conformational change that increases agonist affinity for the orthosteric binding site. In contrast to the binding assays, however, the Org compounds behaved as insurmountable antagonists of receptor function; in the reporter gene assay, the guanosine 5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding assay and the mouse vas deferens assay they elicited a significant reduction in the Emax value for CB1 receptor agonists. The data presented clearly demonstrate, for the first time, that the cannabinoid CB1 receptor contains an allosteric binding site that can be recognized by synthetic small molecule ligands.     

Soft cannabinoid analogues as potential anti-glaucoma agents

Cannabinoids have intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effects, thus, they have a therapeutic potential in the treatment of glaucoma. Unfortunately, in the same time, they show CNS and cardiovascular effects as well. Our aim was to develop a safer, cannabinoid type anti-glaucoma agent, a topically applied soft analogue, that has local, but no systemic effect. The lead compound chosen was a nitrogen-containing cannabinoid analogue that was shown to have IOP lowering activity. A full library of possible soft drugs was generated and the structures were ranked based on the closeness of calculated properties to those of the lead compound. The lead compound has been synthesized, and a preliminary pharmacological study was performed. The structure-activity relationship and pharmacological results indicate a good possibility for the development of a safe, soft anti-glaucoma agent.     

Soft cannabinoid analogues as potential anti-glaucoma agents

Cannabinoids are able to reduce elevated intraocular pressure; however, their use in glaucoma treatment is not approved due to severe systemic side effects. New cannabinoid derivatives have been designed based on a retrometabolic/soft drug approach; they were expected to have local effect, but not systemic side effects. Lead compounds and soft analogues were prepared using Pechmann condensation. In agreement with the SAR hypothesis used for the present soft drug design, all the compounds that were successfully synthesized had IOP lowering effect, but the common metabolite of soft analogues that was found to be inactive. Accordingly, when the soft analogue 8 was administered i.v., its biological effect lasted just for 15 minutes; nevertheless, when administered topically, its effect lasted significantly longer. Its metabolite, though, was inactive when applied either i.v. or topically. Thus, the designed soft analogues proved to be good candidates for topical control of glaucoma without producing systemic side effects. The preliminary i.v. experimental data could be successfully described by an indirect response PK/PD model.     

CB1 cannabinoid receptor activity is modulated by the cannabinoid receptor interacting protein CRIP 1a

The CB1 cannabinoid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor that has important physiological roles in synaptic plasticity, analgesia, appetite, and neuroprotection. We report the discovery of two structurally related CB1 cannabinoid receptor interacting proteins (CRIP1a and CRIP1b) that bind to the distal C-terminal tail of CB1. CRIP1a and CRIP1b are generated by alternative splicing of a gene located on chromosome 2 in humans, and orthologs of CRIP1a occur throughout the vertebrates, whereas CRIP1b seems to be unique to primates. CRIP1a coimmunoprecipitates with CB1 receptors derived from rat brain homogenates, indicating that CRIP1a and CB1 interact in vivo. Furthermore, in superior cervical ganglion neurons coinjected with CB1 and CRIP1a or CRIP1b cDNA, CRIP1a, but not CRIP1b, suppresses CB1-mediated tonic inhibition of voltage-gated Ca2+ channels. Discovery of CRIP1a provides the basis for a new avenue of research on mechanisms of CB1 regulation in the nervous system and may lead to development of novel drugs to treat disorders where modulation of CB1 activity has therapeutic potential (e.g., chronic pain, obesity, and epilepsy).     

Recent advances in CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonists

Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonists are currently the subject of intensive research due to their highly promising therapeutic prospects. Novel chemical entities having CB1 antagonistic properties have recently been disclosed by several pharmaceutical companies and some academic research groups, some of which are close structural analogs of the leading compound rimonabant (SR-141716A; Sanofi-Synthélabo). A considerable number of these CB1 antagonists are bioisosteres that are derived from rimonabant by the replacement of the pyrazole moiety with an alternative heterocycle. As well as these achiral compounds, Solvay Pharmaceuticals have disclosed a novel class of chiral pyrazolines that are potent and CB1/CB2 subtype-selective cannabinoid receptor antagonists, in which the interactions with the CB1 receptor are highly stereoselective.     

CB1 cannabinoid receptor signalling in Parkinson's disease

Signalling at CB(1) cannabinoid receptors plays a key role in the control of movement in health and disease. In recent years, an increased understanding of the physiological role of transmission at CB(1) receptors throughout the basal ganglia circuitry has led to the identification of novel therapeutic approaches to both the symptoms of Parkinson's disease and the side effects of current anti-parkinsonian therapies, especially L(3,4) dihydroxyphenylalamine (levodopa)-induced dyskinesia. Thus, because activation of basal ganglia CB(1) receptors can modulate neurotransmission and contribute to synaptic plasticity in a manner similar to that described in other brain regions, it also appears that endocannabinoids might modulate cell-cell signalling via effects on neurotransmitter re-uptake and postsynaptic actions mediating cross talk between multiple receptor types. Recent studies in animal models and in the clinic suggest that CB(1) receptor antagonists could prove useful in the treatment of parkinsonian symptoms and levodopa-induced dyskinesia, whereas CB(1) receptor agonists could have value in reducing levodopa-induced dyskinesia.     

Spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal produces a differential time-related responsiveness in cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene expression in the mouse brain

This study aimed to examine the behavioural and neurochemical (cannabinoid CB1 receptor gene expression) changes induced by spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal in mice. Tolerance was assessed by measuring rectal temperature and motor activity in the open-field test after CP-55, 940 administration. Cannabinoid withdrawal symptoms were determined by measuring motor activity and behavioural signs of abstinence. Cessation of CP-55, 940 treatment in tolerant mice induced a spontaneous time-dependent behavioural withdrawal syndrome consisting of marked increases (140%) in motor activity, number of rearings (170%), decreases in grooming (57%), wet dog shakes (73%) and rubbing behaviours (74%) on day 1, progressively reaching values similar to vehicle-treated mice on day 3. Interestingly, this spontaneous cannabinoid withdrawal resulted in CB1 gene expression upregulation (20-30%) in caudate-putamen, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, central amygdaloid nucleus and CA1, whereas in the CA3 field of hippocampus, a significant decrease (15-20%) was detected. Taken together, the results of this study suggest that cessation of CP-55, 940 administration in tolerant mice produces a behavioural cannabinoid withdrawal syndrome and a selective and differential responsiveness in CB1 receptor gene expression in several brain regions of the mice. These findings further suggest a time and regional differential role for cannabinoid receptors in short- and long-term neuroadaptations that occur after exposure to cannabis derivatives.     

The cannabinoid CB2 receptor as a target for inflammation-dependent neurodegeneration

Endocannabinoids are released following brain injury and may protect against excitotoxic damage during the acute stage of injury. Brain injury also activates microglia in a secondary inflammatory phase of more widespread damage. Most drugs targeting the acute stage are not effective if administered more than 6 hours after injury. Therefore, drugs targeting microglia later in the neurodegenerative cascade are desirable. We have found that cannabinoid CB2 receptors are up-regulated during the activation of microglia following brain injury. Specifically, CB2-positive cells appear in the rat brain following both hypoxia-ischemia (HI) and middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO). This may regulate post-injury microglial activation and inflammatory functions. In this paper we review in vivo and in vitro studies of CB2 receptors in microglia, including our results on CB2 expression post-injury. Taken together, studies show that CB2 is up-regulated during a process in which microglia become primed to proliferate, and then become fully reactive. In addition, CB2 activation appears to prevent or decrease microglial activation. In a rodent model of Alzheimer's disease microglial activation was completely prevented by administration of a selective CB2 agonist. The presence of CB2 receptors in microglia in the human Alzheimer's diseased brain suggests that CB2 may provide a novel target for a range of neuropathologies. We conclude that the administration of CB2 agonists and antagonists may differentially alter microglia-dependent neuroinflammation. CB2 specific compounds have considerable therapeutic appeal over CB1 compounds, as the exclusive expression of CB2 on immune cells within the brain provides a highly specialised target, without the psychoactivity that plagues CB1 directed therapies.     

Ligand based structural studies of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor

Abstract: The structural characterization of G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) is quite important as these proteins represent a vast number of therapeutic targets involved in drug discovery. However, solving the three‐dimensional structure of GPCR has been a significant obstacle in structural biology. A variety of reasons, including their large molecular weight, intricate interhelical packing, as well as their membrane‐associated topology, has hindered efforts aimed at their purification. In the absence of pure protein, available in the native conformation, classical methods of structural analysis such as X‐ray crystallography and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy cannot be utilized successfully. Alternative methods must therefore be explored to facilitate the structural features involved in drug–receptor interactions. The methods described herein detail the use of covalent probes, or affinity labels, capable of binding covalently to a target GPCR at its binding site(s). Our approach involves the incorporation of a number of reactive moieties in different regions of the ligand molecule each of which is expected to react with different amino acid residues. Information obtained from such work coupled with computer modeling and validated by the use of site‐directed mutagenesis of GPCRs allows for three‐dimensional mapping of the receptor binding site. It also sheds light on the different possible binding motifs for the various classes of agonists and antagonists and identifies amino acid residues involved with GPCR activation or inactivation.     

Evidence that the plant cannabinoid Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin is a cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptor antagonist

Delta9-tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) displaced [(3)H]CP55940 from specific binding sites on mouse brain and CHO-hCB(2) cell membranes (K(i)=75.4 and 62.8 nM, respectively).THCV (1 microM) also antagonized CP55940-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to these membranes (apparent K(B)=93.1 and 10.1 nM, respectively).In the mouse vas deferens, the ability of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to inhibit electrically evoked contractions was antagonized by THCV, its apparent K(B)-value (96.7 nM) approximating the apparent K(B)-values for its antagonism of CP55940- and R-(+)-WIN55212-induced stimulation of [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding to mouse brain membranes. THCV also antagonized R-(+)-WIN55212, anandamide, methanandamide and CP55940 in the vas deferens, but with lower apparent K(B)-values (1.5, 1.2, 4.6 and 10.3 nM, respectively).THCV (100 nM) did not oppose clonidine, capsaicin or (-)-7-hydroxy-cannabidiol-dimethylheptyl-induced inhibition of electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens.Contractile responses of the vas deferens to phenylephrine hydrochloride or beta,gamma-methylene-ATP were not reduced by 1microM THCV or R-(+)-WIN55212, suggesting that THCV interacts with R-(+)-WIN55212 at prejunctional sites.At 32 microM, THCV did reduce contractile responses to phenylephrine hydrochloride and beta,gamma-methylene-ATP, and above 3 microM it inhibited electrically evoked contractions of the vas deferens in an SR141716A-independent manner.In conclusion, THCV behaves as a competitive CB(1) and CB(2) receptor antagonist. In the vas deferens, it antagonized several cannabinoids more potently than THC and was also more potent against CP55940 and R-(+)-WIN55212 in this tissue than in brain membranes. The bases of these agonist- and tissue-dependent effects remain to be established.     

Immunohistochemical localization of cerebrovascular cannabinoid CB1 receptor protein

Cannabinoids are powerful hypotensives and vasodilators. However, their mode of action is controversial. This study is the first to investigate the distribution of vascular CB1 receptor protein expression in situ. We used double-fluorescence and chromogenic immunohistochemistry to investigate patterns of CB1 protein expression in cerebrovascular tissue in rat brain sections. We found a layer of intense CB1 labeling immediately adjacent to the internal elastic lamina, consistent with myointimal and vascular smooth muscle cells, and diffuse labeling adventitial to this layer. We concluded that CB1 receptor are most intensely expressed in the vascular smooth muscle layer in cerebral arteries, and are likely to be chiefly responsible for the potent vasodilatory effect of cannabinoids.     

Development of a 3D model for the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor

A novel comparison model of the human cannabinoid CB1 receptor has been constructed using the bovine rhodopsin X-ray structure as a template. The model was subjected to a 500-ps molecular dynamics simulation, and thereafter new conformers of the receptor model were produced in a simulated annealing procedure. Using an automated docking procedure, well-known cannabimimetic ligands were docked into six different model conformers, of which one was chosen for a detailed study of receptor-ligand interactions. The docking results confirm, for example, the importance of lysine K3.28(192) in the binding of these ligands. Also, other experimental data are fairly consistent with the present model, though there are some differences when compared to other recent CB1 comparison models. The present model will serve as a tool to investigate the receptor-ligand interactions and facilitate the design of novel cannabimimetic drugs.     

Defective adult neurogenesis in CB1 cannabinoid receptor knockout mice

Pharmacological studies suggest a role for CB1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1R) in regulating neurogenesis in the adult brain. To investigate this possibility, we measured neurogenesis by intraperitoneal injection of bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), which labels newborn neurons, in wild-type and CB1R-knockout (CB1R-KO) mice. CB1R-KO mice showed reductions in the number of BrdU-labeled cells to approximately 50% of wild-type (WT) levels in dentate gyrus and subventricular zone (SVZ), suggesting that CB1R activation promotes neurogenesis. To test this further, WT mice were given the CB1R antagonist N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboximide hydrochloride (SR141716A) before measuring neurogenesis with BrdU. SR141716A paradoxically increased the number of BrdU-labeled cells by approximately 50% in SVZ; another CB1R antagonist, 1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-4-methyl-N-1-piperidinyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide (AM251), had a similar effect. To investigate this discrepancy, SR141716A was given to CB1R-KO mice, in which it still stimulated neurogenesis, indicating involvement of a non-CB1 receptor. Action at one such non-CB1, SR141716A-sensitive site, the VR1 vanilloid receptor, was tested by administering SR141716A to VR1-KO mice, in which the ability of SR141716A to enhance neurogenesis was abolished. Thus, CB1 and VR1 receptors both seem to have roles in regulating adult neurogenesis.     

Lack of CB1 cannabinoid receptor impairs cocaine self-administration.

Acute rewarding properties are essential for the establishment of cocaine addiction, and multiple neurochemical processes participate in this complex behavior. In the present study, we used the self-administration paradigm to evaluate the role of CB1 cannabinoid receptors in several aspects of cocaine reward, including acquisition, maintenance, and motivation to seek the drug. For this purpose, both CB1 receptor knockout mice and wild-type littermates were trained to intravenously self-administer cocaine under different schedules. Several cocaine training doses (0.32, 1, and 3.2 mg/kg/infusion) were used in the acquisition studies. Only 25% of CB1 knockout mice vs 75% of their wild-type littermates acquired a reliable operant responding to self-administer the most effective dose of cocaine (1 mg/kg/infusion), and the number of sessions required to attain this behavior was increased in knockout mice. Animals reaching the acquisition criteria were evaluated for the motivational strength of cocaine as a reinforcer under a progressive ratio schedule. The maximal effort to obtain a cocaine infusion was significantly reduced after the genetic ablation of CB1 receptors. A similar result was obtained after the pharmacological blockade of CB1 receptors with SR141716A in wild-type mice. Moreover, the cocaine dose-response curve was flattened in the knockout group, suggesting that the differences observed between genotypes were related to changes in the reinforcing efficacy of the training dose of cocaine. Self-administration for water and food was not altered in CB1 knockout mice in any of the reinforcement schedules used, which emphasizes the selective impairment of drug reinforcement in these knockout mice. Finally, cocaine effects on mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission were evaluated by in vivo microdialysis in these mice. Acute cocaine administration induced a similar enhancement in the extracellular levels of dopamine in the nucleus accumbens of both CB1 knockout and wild-type mice. This work clearly demonstrates that CB1 receptors play an important role in the consolidation of cocaine reinforcement, although are not required for its acute effects on mesolimbic dopaminergic transmission.     

Novel pyrrolocycloalkylpyrazole analogues as CB1 ligands

Novel 1,4‐dihydropyrazolo[3,4‐a]pyrrolizine‐, 4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[4,3‐g]indolizine‐ and 1,4,5,6‐tetrahydropyrazolo[3,4‐c]pyrrolo[1,2‐a]azepine‐3‐carboxamide‐based compounds were designed and synthesized for cannabinoid CB₁ and CB₂ receptor interactions. Any of the new synthesized compounds showed high affinity for CB₂ receptor with K_i values superior to 314 nm , whereas some of them showed moderate affinity for CB₁ receptor with K_i values inferior to 400 nm . 7‐Chloro‐1‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐N‐(homopiperidin‐1‐yl)‐4,5‐dihydro‐1H‐pyrazolo[4,3‐g]indolizine‐3‐carboxamide ( 2j ) exhibited good affinity for CB₁ receptor (K_iCB₁ = 81 nm ) and the highest CB₂/CB₁ selectively ratio (>12). Docking studies carried out on such compounds were performed using the hCB₁ X‐ray in complex with the close pyrazole analogue AM6538 and disclosed specific pattern of interactions related to the tricyclic pyrrolopyrazole scaffolds as CB₁ ligands.     

Indol-3-yl-tetramethylcyclopropyl ketones: effects of indole ring substitution on CB2 cannabinoid receptor activity

A series of potent indol-3-yl-tetramethylcyclopropyl ketones have been prepared as CB 2 cannabinoid receptor ligands. Two unsubstituted indoles ( 5, 32) were the starting points for an investigation of the effect of indole ring substitutions on CB 2 and CB 1 binding affinities and activity in a CB 2 in vitro functional assay. Indole ring substitutions had varying effects on CB 2 and CB 1 binding, but were generally detrimental to agonist activity. Substitution on the indole ring did lead to improved CB 2/CB 1 binding selectivity in some cases (i.e., 7- 9, 15- 20). All indoles with the morpholino-ethyl side chain ( 32- 43) exhibited weaker binding affinity and less agonist activity relative to that of their tetrahydropyranyl-methyl analogs ( 5- 31). Several agonists were active in the complete Freund's adjuvant model of chronic inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia ( 32, 15).     

Current evidence supporting a role of cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) antagonists as potential pharmacotherapies for drug abuse disorders

Since the discovery of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor (CB1R) in 1988, and subsequently of the CB2 receptor (CB2R) in 1993, there has been an exponential growth of research investigating the functions of the endocannabinoid system. The roles of CB1Rs have been of particular interest to behavioral pharmacologists because of their selective presence within the central nervous system (CNS) and because of their association with brain-reward circuits involving mesocorticolimbic dopamine systems. One potential role that has become of considerable recent focus is the ability of CB1Rs to modulate the effects of drugs of abuse. Many drugs of abuse elevate dopamine levels, and the ability of CB1R antagonists or inverse agonists to attenuate these elevations has suggested their potential application as pharmacotherapies for treating drug abuse disorders. With the identification of the selective CB1R antagonist, SR141716, in 1994, and its subsequent widespread availability, there has been a rapid expansion of research investigating its ability to modulate the effects of drugs of abuse. The preliminary clinical reports of its success in retarding relapse in tobacco users have accelerated this expansion. This report critically reviews preclinical and clinical studies involving the ability of CB1R antagonists to attenuate the effects of drugs of abuse, while providing an overview of the neuroanatomical and neurochemical points of contact between the endocannabinoid system and systems mediating abuse-related effects.     

Cannabidiol is a negative allosteric modulator of the cannabinoid CB1 receptor

Background and Purpose

Cannabidiol has been reported to act as an antagonist at cannabinoid CB₁ receptors. We hypothesized that cannabidiol would inhibit cannabinoid agonist activity through negative allosteric modulation of CB₁ receptors.

Experimental Approach

Internalization of CB₁ receptors, arrestin2 recruitment, and PLCβ3 and ERK1/2 phosphorylation, were quantified in HEK 293A cells heterologously expressing CB₁ receptors and in the STHdh ^Q7/Q7 cell model of striatal neurons endogenously expressing CB₁ receptors. Cells were treated with 2‐arachidonylglycerol or Δ⁹‐tetrahydrocannabinol alone and in combination with different concentrations of cannabidiol.

Key Results

Cannabidiol reduced the efficacy and potency of 2‐arachidonylglycerol and Δ⁹‐tetrahydrocannabinol on PLCβ3‐ and ERK1/2‐dependent signalling in cells heterologously (HEK 293A) or endogenously (STHdh ^Q7/Q7) expressing CB₁ receptors. By reducing arrestin2 recruitment to CB₁ receptors, cannabidiol treatment prevented internalization of these receptors. The allosteric activity of cannabidiol depended upon polar residues being present at positions 98 and 107 in the extracellular amino terminus of the CB₁ receptor.

Conclusions and Implications

Cannabidiol behaved as a non‐competitive negative allosteric modulator of CB₁ receptors. Allosteric modulation, in conjunction with effects not mediated by CB₁ receptors, may explain the in vivo effects of cannabidiol. Allosteric modulators of CB₁ receptors have the potential to treat CNS and peripheral disorders while avoiding the adverse effects associated with orthosteric agonism or antagonism of these receptors.

Abbreviations

2‐AG

2‐arachidonyl glycerol

BRET_Eff

BRET efficiency

CBD

cannabidiol

FAAH

fatty acid amide hydrolase

NAM

negative allosteric modulator

THC

Δ⁹‐tetrahydrocannabinol

     

CB1 cannabinoid receptors mediate anxiolytic effects: convergent genetic and pharmacological evidence with CB1-specific agents

Cannabinoids are known to modulate GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in cortical areas, the former via CB1 and the latter via a novel receptor. Pharmacological data demonstrate that several widely used cannabinoid ligands bind to both receptors, which may explain the inconsistencies in their behavioural effects. Earlier we showed that the cannabinoid antagonist SR-141716A affected behaviour in both CB1 knockout and wild-type animals, and its effect (anxiolysis) was different from that of CB1 gene disruption (anxiogenesis). In the present experiments, we studied the effects of the CB1 antagonist AM-251, and the cannabinoid agonist WIN-55,212-2 in wild-type as well as in CB1 knockout mice. CB1 knockout mice showed higher scores of anxiety-like behaviour than the wild-type animals in the elevated plus-maze. Selective blockade of CB1 receptors by AM-251 (0.3, 1 and 3 mg/kg) increased anxiety-like behaviour dose-dependently in the wild-type mice but had no effect in the knockouts. In wild types, the cannabinoid agonist WIN-55,212-2 (1 and 3 mg/kg) caused a decrease in anxiety-like behaviour, which was abolished by the CB1-selective antagonist AM-251 (3 mg/kg). The same agonist did not change plus-maze behaviour in CB1 knockout animals. These data demonstrate at the behavioural level that AM-251 and, at low concentrations, WIN-55,212-2, are selective ligands of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor in mice. Our studies on the behavioural effects of the cannabinoid antagonist SR-141716A and the CB1 antagonist AM-251 show that the CB1 and the novel cannabinoid receptor mediate anxiolytic and anxiogenic effects, respectively. This suggests that agonists of the former, or antagonists of the latter, are promising new compounds in the pharmacotherapy of anxiety.