Basiliximab versus daclizumab combined with triple immunosuppression in deceased donor renal graft recipients

In this prospective, randomized, open-label, single-center study, we compared the efficacy and safety of two anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibodies among adult recipients of at least 1 HLA-mismatched deceased donor renal grafts. Eligible patients were randomized to induction with either basiliximab or daclizumab. Both groups received cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and methylprednisolone. An intent-to-treat analysis of 1-year data assessed the incidence of acute rejection episodes, the renal graft function, the safety, and the patient and graft survivals. Among 127 patients, six (10.0%) and seven (11.5%) patients experienced biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months, in the basiliximab and the daclizumab groups, respectively. Two renal grafts were lost in the basiliximab and six in the daclizumab cohort, one of them due to rejection. One basiliximab and two daclizumab patients died. Hospital treatment was required for 25 and 33 infections in basiliximab and daclizumab groups, respectively. One basal cell carcinoma of skin was detected. One hypersensitivity reaction was observed with daclizumab. At 12 months, serum creatinine was 101+/-28 micromol/L with basiliximab and 109+/-41 micromol/L with daclizumab. Patient survival was 98.4% with basiliximab and 96.7% with daclizumab, and graft survival was 96.8% versus 90.8%, respectively. No significant differences were observed between the groups. Basiliximab or daclizumab combined with triple therapy was an efficient and safe immunosuppression strategy, demonstrated with low incidence of acute rejection episodes, an acceptable adverse event profile, excellent graft function, and high survival rates in adult recipients within the first year after deceased donor renal transplantation.     

Induction immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplantation: does basiliximab make the difference?

The optimal prophylactic induction immunosuppressive therapy to prevent renal transplant rejection remains controversial. Recently, basiliximab efficiency has been reported in several studies. We sought to evaluate the efficiency of induction immunosuppressive therapy with basiliximab in renal transplantation in our unit based upon the acute rejection rate, patient and graft survivals, first hospital admission length, and incidence of infectious or malignant complications during 4 years of follow-up. We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of two groups of renal transplant recipients treated with triple immunosuppressive therapy (cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisolone) without (group 1, 149 patients) or with (group 2, 104 patients) induction immunosuppression with basiliximab. The two groups did not differ in demographic characteristics, number of hypersensitized patients, cold ischemia time, or donor age. The group receiving basiliximab displayed a significantly lower acute rejection rate (7.6% vs 24%, P = .001) and shorter first hospital admission (14.4 +/- 8 vs 19.5 +/- 11 days). There was no difference in graft or patient survival, death due to sepsis, or incidence of posttransplant malignancies. Although there was no difference in graft or patient survival, immunosuppressive induction therapy with basiliximab yielded a significant reduction in the acute rejection rate.     

Anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody sequential immunosuppressive induction therapy in renal transplants with high risk of delayed graft function

There is little experience on the use of monoclonal antibodies that block the high-affinity interleukin-2 receptor (basiliximab and daclizumab) in sequential therapy in renal transplants with risk of delayed graft function. This study sougth to test the efficacy and safety of the substitution of anticalcineurins with two doses of basiliximab or daclizumab in the immediate posttransplant period for recipients at risk of delayed renal graft function. Immunosuppression consisted of steroids, mycophenolate mofetil, and two doses of basiliximab (20 mg/day) on days 0 and 4 posttransplant or daclizumab (1 mg/kg per day) on days 0 and 15 posttransplant. Anticalcineurins were not administered until the beginning of graft function. Among 49 recipients (mean age 63.5 +/- 10.5 years), 40 received a kidney from a donor over 60 years of age, three from a non-heart-beating donor, and six from donors with an acute elevation of serum creatinine to 2.4 +/- 0.86 (1.7-3.7). At a mean follow-up of 14.2 +/- 8.4 months, five patients experienced acute rejection episodes. Only 15 patients needed posttransplant dialysis (2.7 +/- 1.6). In 11 patients, cyclosporine (CsA) was introduced at 6 +/- 2.9 days posttransplant and in 37, tacrolimus on 8.6 +/- 3.6 days posttransplant. The incidence of kidney graft loss was 16.3%. Patient survival was 96%. Thirty-nine recipients are alive with functioning grafts, with mean serum creatinine of 1.4 mg/dL. In conclusion, substitution for anticalcineurins with interleukin-2-receptor blockade in the immediate posttransplant period for patients at risk of delayed graft function minimizes nephrotoxicity and reduces tubular necrosis, without increasing the risk of an acute rejection episode.     

Improved efficacy of basiliximab over antilymphocyte globulin induction therapy in paediatric renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Basiliximab is a chimeric human/mouse monoclonal antibody directed against the alpha chain of the IL-2 receptor, CD25, which has been reported as successfully reducing rejection in adult renal transplant recipients. Reported clinical experience of basiliximab in paediatric renal transplantation is limited. METHODS: Using two intravenous doses on day 0 (pre-operatively) and day 4 with prednisolone and cyclosporin A (dual) maintenance immunosuppression in 42 children undergoing renal transplantation in our unit (SIM group), we have compared patient and graft outcome, rejection rates in the first 6 months, renal function and the incidence of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection with 42 consecutive children who previously received antilymphocyte globulin immunoprophylaxis with prednisolone, cyclosporin A and azathioprine (triple) maintenance immunosuppression (ALG group). The two groups were similar, including HLA mismatching, apart from age and size at transplantation (SIM=10.3+/-5.4 years vs ALG=12.4+/-4.2 years, P<0.05). RESULTS: One patient in the SIM group died from food inhalation with a functioning kidney and one patient in the ALG group from Pneumocystis pneumonia and post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders with a rejecting graft. Both 1- and 2-year actuarial graft survivals were 93% for the SIM group and 86% for the ALG group (NS). Three grafts were lost in the SIM group-none from rejection (thrombosis 2, death 1)-and seven in the ALG group-three from rejection. Occurrence of biopsy documented rejection in the first 6 months after transplantation was 0.15+/-0.22 for the SIM group and 0.35+/-0.51 episodes per pt-month at risk for ALG treatment (P<0.04). Early rejection within 30 post-operative days occurred in only four SIM patients, three of whom had undergone retransplantation. Forty-seven per cent of rejection episodes occurred between days 30 and 44 in SIM treated patients. Switching to tacrolimus was similar in both groups; 24% of the SIM groups were prescribed triple therapy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was 46.0 and 46.2 ml/min for SIM and ALG groups, respectively, six months after transplantation. Ten per cent of SIM and 19% of ALG treated patients developed clinically significant CMV infection (NS) but none of 16 (R(+)) SIM children had CMV infection compared with 8 out of 15 (R(+)) ALG patients (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis and dual therapy reduces rejection episodes in the first six months and maintains graft survival and function after paediatric renal transplantation. Seventy-six per cent of children receiving basiliximab immunoprophylaxis were successfully maintained on long-term dual immunosuppression. This immunosuppressive protocol reduces CMV disease in CMV(+) recipients compared with ALG induction and triple therapy.     

Use of basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have determined that administration of basiliximab (chimeric IL-2 receptor antagonist) decreases the acute rejection rate in kidney transplantation when used in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids. We report our experience using basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil, a calcineurin inhibitor, and steroids in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who received their first kidney transplant between September 1, 1998, and December 30, 2000, including 59 who received basiliximab (22 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients) and the 68 that did not receive this antibody (31 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients). The groups were demographically comparable for risk factors such as race, peak of panel-reactive antibody, delayed graft function, donor age, and cold ischemia time. The analysis assessed serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease incidence as well as patient and graft survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Serum creatinine levels were 3 +/- 3.1 and 2.6 +/- 2.5 mg/dL (P =.346) at discharge, 1.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P =.098) at 1 month, and 1.5 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dL (P =.454) at 6 months posttransplantation for patients treated with versus without basiliximab, respectively. Only one episode of acute rejection was seen among patients treated with basiliximab within 1 month posttransplantation versus three episodes among patients treated without basiliximab (P =.382). Three patients (5.1%) treated with basiliximab and two patients (2.9%) treated without basiliximab developed acute rejection within 6 months posttransplantation (P =.536). Patient and graft survivals at 6 months posttransplantation were not significantly different between patients treated with versus without basiliximab (100% and 100% versus 100% and 98.3%, respectively). There was no increased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with the use of basiliximab (5.1% vs 5.9%, P =.844). There was only one case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease within 6 months posttransplantation in a patient treated without basiliximab. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the routine addition of basiliximab to a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens does not appear to be warranted. A larger prospective randomized study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Sequential quadruple immunosuppression including sirolimus in extended criteria and nonheartbeating donor kidney transplantation

The aim was to evaluate feasibility and safety of calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression in high-risk donor kidney transplantation with sequential sirolimus introduction. Kidney transplant patients (n=76) with a donor aged >60 years, donor with acute renal failure, or a nonheartbeating donor were included. Immunosuppression consisted of antithymocyte globulin or basiliximab, mycophenolate mofetil, prednisone, and sequential introduction of sirolimus. One-year patient survival was 96.2% and 95.8%; graft survival was 94.2% and 91.7%; acute rejection rates were 21.2% and 12.4%; delayed graft function was 21.2% and 66.7%; and creatinine clearance was 58+/-20 mL/min and 56+/-21 mL/min for the brain-dead donor group and the nonheartbeating donor group, respectively. Most adverse events were infections, but also three lymphoceles, three urinary fistulas, three wound seromas. Sequential sirolimus introduction in high-risk donor kidney transplantation was found to lead to good patient and graft survival and incidence of acute rejection and delayed graft function.     

Preemptive kidney transplant from deceased donors: an advantage in relation to reduced waiting list

BACKGROUND: Preemptive living donor kidney transplantation is associated with better allograft and recipient survival. However, it remains unclear whether preemptive transplantation from deceased donors is beneficial too. An increased number of deceased donors has reduced the waiting list in our hospital in the last years allowing preemptive deceased donor kidney transplantation (PDDKT). AIM: We compared our experience with preemptive transplantation with patients who underwent dialysis before transplantation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-three PDDKT, including 77.5% male patients of overall mean age of 48 +/- 14 years, were performed in our hospital between January 1999 and December 2004 (8% of transplantations). We compared the outcomes of these patients with those of renal transplants in subjects who had undergone dialysis. The donors for both groups had similar characteristic; they were paired donor kidneys in most cases. RESULTS: The types of donors in both groups were: non-heart-beating (49%), heart-beating deceased (27%) or en bloc pediatric (24%). The serum creatinine of the recipients was 6.9 +/- 1.8 mg/dL prior to transplantation, and the creatinine clearance was 14.6 +/- 3.6 mL/min (estimated by the Cockroft-Gault formula). The Charlson comorbidity index adapted for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (ACKD) was 0.8 +/- 0.2 in the preemptive group versus 1.7 +/- 0.4 in the dialysis group (P < .05). Delayed graft function rates were 0% versus 25% in preemptive vs dialysis groups, respectively. No differences in 1-month or 1-year renal function as determined by serum creatinine were observed between the groups. We did not observe differences in the incidence of acute rejection or 1- and 2-year graft and patient survivals. CONCLUSION: PDDKT is the treatment of choice for ACKD. It is associated with less delayed graft function and similar 2-year graft and patient survivals than kidney transplantation after dialysis. The Charlson index reflected less comorbidity among patients with PDDKT, a finding that must influence long-term outcomes.     

Results in 158 consecutive cadaveric renal transplantations

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the outcome of deceased donor kidney transplantations performed in a single center in a developing country. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 158 patients (69 male and 89 female patients, including 32 children) received kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors between March 1996 and October 2004. Cadaveric renal grafts were transplanted after a cold ischemia time of 4 to 24 hours (mean, 12.5 hours). Retransplantation was performed in 19 recipients. Induction immunosuppression was achieved with antithymocyte globulin. The diagnosis of acute graft rejection was based on histopathological findings. RESULTS: Primary graft function was observed in 77% of cases. Posttransplantation complications were: surgical (n = 60; 38%), systemic bacterial and viral infections (n = 33; 21%), acute rejection (n = 47; 30%), and malignancy (n = 2; 1.3%). Seventeen recipients died with a functioning graft, and 23 more grafts were lost. The 7-year actuarial survival rates were 89% and 75% for recipients and grafts, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The kidney transplantation program in Kuwait is steadily growing. Kidney grafts obtained from deceased donors contributed 28% of the transplantation activity and were associated with a high rate of primary function. Overall actuarial recipient and graft survival rates were comparable to those reported by larger centers.     

Chronic rejection in primary renal allograft recipients under cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppressive therapy

Although the introduction of cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression has improved early renal graft survival, chronic rejection remains a major cause of longterm graft dysfunction. This study retrospectively examined 69 cases of chronic rejection among 643 primary renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine-prednisone immunosuppression from July 1981 to October 1989. Chronic rejection was defined as a rejection episode diagnosed greater than 90 days posttransplantation with characteristics of progressive nonacute renal function deterioration, confirmed, in most cases, by renal biopsy. This group was compared with an equal-sized matched cohort. Among cadaveric recipients, 61 of 456 patients (13.4%) displayed chronic rejection, whereas among living-related recipients, 8 of 187 patients (4.3%) developed chronic rejection. The average time from the date of transplantation to diagnosis of chronic rejection was 15 +/- 14 months. One- and three-year graft survivals following diagnosis of chronic rejection were 51% (30/59) and 25% (13/51), respectively, compared with the cohort one- and three-year graft survivals of 98% (58/59) and 86% (32/37) at similar periods posttransplantation. HLA mismatch, PRA status, blood transfusion history, lipid levels, cyclosporine trough levels, incidence of prior acute rejection, and initial graft dysfunction were not significantly different between the chronic rejection group and the matched cohort. Hypertension and proteinuria were significantly associated with chronic rejection (P less than 0.001). Of 58 biopsies performed, findings solely consistent with chronic rejection were observed in 9 cases (15%) and "acute upon chronic" rejection in 49 cases (83%). Treatment of acute concomitants improved the renal function in 43% (27/63) by the time of hospital discharge. Nonetheless, at 12 months the incidence of improved renal function eroded to 22% (13/59), suggesting that the benefit was relatively short-lived. Although the overall incidence of chronic rejection in this group of cyclosporine-prednisone-treated patients was lower than previous azathioprine-prednisone cohorts, the clinical presentation and progression of chronic rejection was similar. Additionally, the incidence of chronic rejection within this series was lower among living-related recipients versus cadaveric recipients of donor organs.     

Steroid-Free Immunosuppression Since 1999: 129 Pediatric Renal Transplants with Sustained Graft and Patient Benefits

Despite early promising patient and graft outcomes with steroid-free (SF) immunosuppression in pediatric kidney transplant recipients, data on long-term safety and efficacy results are lacking. We present our single-center experience with 129 consecutive pediatric kidney transplant recipients on SF immunosuppression, with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Outcomes are compared against a matched cohort of 57 concurrent recipients treated with steroid-based (SB) immunosuppression. In the SF group, 87% of kidney recipients with functioning grafts remain corticosteroid - free. Actual intent-to-treat SF (ITT-SF) and still-on-protocol SF patient survivals are 96% and 96%, respectively, actual graft survivals for both groups are 93% and 96%, respectively and actual death-censored graft survivals for both groups are 97% and 99%, respectively. Unprecedented catch-up growth is observed in SF recipients below 12 years of age. Continued low rates of acute rejection, posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM), hypertension and hyperlipidemia are seen in SF patients, with sustained benefits for graft function. In conclusion, extended enrollment and longer experience with SF immunosuppression for renal transplantation in low-risk children confirms protocol safety, continued benefits for growth and graft function, low acute rejection rates and reduced cardiovascular morbidity.     

Basiliximab induction in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens

Purpose

The use of basiliximab induction increased significantly in recent years based on its superior efficacy and excellent safety profile demonstrated in studies with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. However, its clinical utility in patients receiving tacrolimus-based immunosuppressive regimens is still uncertain.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data of 366 low immunological risk recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants. Of them, 134 received basiliximab and tacrolimus (TAC-IL2-RA), 100 received basiliximab and delayed tacrolimus(dTAC-IL2-RA), and 132 patients received tacrolimus without basiliximab(TAC-No). The endpoints were the incidence of acute rejection, graft function, and patient and graft survivals at 1 year.

Results

The incidence of acute rejection was higher in dTAC-IL2-RA compared to TAC-IL-2RA and TAC-No Groups (33 vs.14.9 vs. 14.3 %, p < 0.001). Inferior creatinine clearance was observed in dTAC-IL2-RA Group compared to TAC-IL2-RA and TAC-No Groups at months 1 (41.6 vs. 49.9 vs. 44.8 mL/min, p = 0.004), 3 (49.8 vs. 57.2 vs. 53.5 mL/min, p = 0.017), and 6 (53.1 vs. 61.8 vs. 57.0 mL/min, p = 0.001). Patients who received basiliximab (TAC-IL2-RA and dTAC-IL2-RA Groups) had lower incidence of posttransplant diabetes (24 vs.18 vs. 39.3 %, p = 0.009). Patient and graft survivals were similar among the groups.

Conclusions

In low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, the use of basiliximab induction was not associated with lower rejection rates and did not allow delayed tacrolimus introduction.     

Alemtuzumab Induction and Prednisone-Free Maintenance Immunotherapy in Kidney Transplantation: Comparison with Basiliximab Induction—Long-Term Results

This study examined alemtuzumab (anti-CD 52, Campath-1H) and basiliximab (anti-CD 25, Simulect) as induction immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. We used a single-center, nonrandomized, retrospective, sequential study design to evaluate outcomes in kidney transplant recipients given either alemtuzumab (n = 123) or basiliximab (n = 155) induction in combination with a prednisone-free maintenance protocol using tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil. Kaplan-Meier analyses of long-term patient and graft survivals and rejection rates were determined according to induction agent, donor source and recipient ethnicity. Secondary endpoints included the quality of renal allograft function and the etiology of infectious complications. Overall long-term patient and graft survival rates did not significantly differ between patients treated with alemtuzumab and basiliximab. A lower rate of early (<3 months) rejection was observed in the alemtuzumab (4.1%) versus the basiliximab (11.6%) group, but the rates for both groups were equivalent at 1 year. Patient and kidney survival and rejection rates were nearly identical between Caucasians and African Americans that received alemtuzumab. Quality of renal function and incidence of infectious complications were similar in the two groups. Alemtuzumab induction therapy was similar in efficacy to basiliximab in a prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocol for an ethnically diverse population of kidney transplant recipients.     

Kidney Transplantation With Corticosteroid-Free Maintenance Immunosuppression: A Single Center Analysis of Graft and Patient Survivals

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of a corticosteroid-free maintenance immunosuppression on graft survival in kidney transplantation. We analyzed 79 patients who were transplanted between June 1, 2006 and May 31, 2007. We excluded hyperimmunized patients, second transplantations, living donors, and black recipients. Patients underwent induction with thymoglobulin or basiliximab, followed by treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, and methylprednisolone. On the 5th day, the patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (n = 45) discontinued steroid therapy; group B (n = 34) continued prednisone therapy. We performed a comparative analysis of incidence of delayed graft function (DGF), acute rejection episodes (ARE), renal function at 6 and 12 months, graft and patient survivals, causes of graft loss, and mortality. The 2 groups were similar for donor, recipient, and graft characteristics. The incidences of DGF were 8.9% in group A and 14.7% in group B; those for ARE were 2.3% in group A and 13.8% in group B (P = .077). The mean serum creatinine levels at 6 and 12 months were similar. There were 8 graft losses: 3 in group A (3 deaths with functioning grafts) and 5 in group B (1 death, 3 vascular causes, 1 kidney nonfunction). The 4 deaths were due to infection (n = 3) or neoplasia (n = 1). Graft survivals at 1 year were 98% in group A and 85% in group B, and patient survivals were 98% and 97%, respectively. An immunosuppressive regimen using antibody induction and steroid-free treatment proved to be effective in low-risk patients.     

Should living-unrelated renal transplant recipients receive antibody induction? Results of a clinical experience trial

BACKGROUND: Living-donor kidney transplant recipients generally do not receive antibody induction. Induction avoidance may not be appropriate, particularly for living-unrelated renal transplant (LURT) recipients, in whom matching may not be optimal. We compared the incidence of acute rejection and graft outcome of LURT recipients who were administered no induction and cadaveric renal transplant (CRT) recipients who were administered anti-CD25 antibody. These groups both had immediate graft function and similar maintenance immunosuppression. METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients who received kidney transplants between 1999 and 2000. CRT recipients received basiliximab, corticosteroids, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), and delayed tacrolimus (serum creatinine <3 mg/dL). LURT recipients received tacrolimus (initiated pretransplantation), MMF, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: The analysis included 136 LURT recipients and 126 CRT recipients. CRT recipients included more African Americans (52.4% vs. 30.9%, P<0.01). LURT recipients included more patients with at least one human leukocyte antigen mismatch (97.8% vs. 85.7%, P<0.01). A higher acute rejection rate was observed in LURT recipients at both 6 months (LURT recipients 19.1% vs. CRT recipients 3.2%, P<0.01) and 1 year (21.3% vs. 4.0%, P<0.0004); a higher rate also was observed in African American LURT recipients compared with African American CRT recipients (35.7% vs. 4.5%, P<0.0015) at 1 year. LURT recipients demonstrated a threefold greater rejection risk than CRT recipients who were administered basiliximab (relative risk: 3.6, P<0.002). Graft survival was similar at 1 year. CONCLUSION: The higher rejection rates in LURT recipients (no induction) compared with CRT recipients (basiliximab induction), despite similar chronic immunosuppression (tacrolimus, MMF, and steroids) and immediate graft function, indicate the potential advantage of anti-CD25 induction in LURT protocols to reduce the risk of acute rejection.     

Rabbit antithymocyte globulin compared with basiliximab in kidney transplantation: a single-center study

Background

Induction therapy is used to reduce the incidence of acute rejection and to prevent or treat delayed graft function. We compared basiliximab with rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) as induction therapies for kidney transplant recipients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data from 514 patients who received ATG or basiliximab. The patients in the ATG group (n = 152) received ATG (1.5 mg/kg/d) for 5-7 days and those in the basiliximab group (n = 362) were given 2 doses of basiliximab (20 mg) on posttransplantation days 0 and 4. All patients received standard triple immunosuppressive therapy with calcineurin inhibitors, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.

Results

There were statistically significant differences in the incidences of delayed graft function, 1-year acute rejection rate, death-censored graft survival, and patient survival between the 2 groups, even though the ATG group had more kidney transplants from deceased donors, higher levels of panel reactive antibodies, and more retransplantations. The incidences of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and parvovirus infection in the ATG group were higher than those in the basiliximab group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of CMV disease between the 2 groups.

Conclusions

ATG is safe and efficacious for use in kidney transplant recipients. Our results suggest that ATG should be considered for induction therapy in high-risk patients, such as those who have a kidney allograft from a deceased donor, high levels of panel reactive antibodies, and are undergoing retransplantation.     

Triple immunosuppression with or without basiliximab in pediatric renal transplantation: acute rejection rates at one year

Acute rejection (AR) is a major determinant of chronic allograft dysfunction and graft survival. This study evaluated the effect of basiliximab on AR in pediatric renal transplantation on triple immunosuppression. Forty-three transplantations (25 males and 18 females; mean age 14.9 +/- 3.6 years) were performed between 1996 and 2002. Thirteen of the grafts came from cadaveric donors and 30 from living-related donors. All patients were placed on immunosuppression with prednisolone + (azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil) + (cyclosporine [CYA] or tacrolimus). Basiliximab was also administered in 20 cases. The respective rates of biopsy-proven AR in the basiliximab group (BG) and the standard-regimen group (N-BG) were 0% vs 17.4% (P >.05) at 1 month posttransplantation; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 3 months; 0% vs 26.1% (P <.05) at 6 months, and 7.1% vs 26.1% (P >.05) at 12 months. In the N-BG group the 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.3% (21/23) and 83.3% (15/18), respectively. The mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in the first year after the transplantation was 75 +/- 33 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the N-BG and 98 +/- 21 mL/min/1.73 m(2) in the BG patients (P <.05).Basiliximab significantly reduced the rates of acute rejection at 3 and 6 months after pediatric renal transplantation. The GFR in the first year was significantly higher among the patients treated with basiliximab, which was well tolerated by all patients and caused no significant adverse effects. The effect of basiliximab on long-term graft survival and chronic allograft dysfunction deserves further investigation.     

Immediate graft function positively affects long-term outcome of renal allografts from older but not from younger donors

There is disagreement about the impact of delayed graft function (DGF) on renal allograft outcome. This may depend on several variables including the age of the donor. We evaluated whether DGF could have different effects in recipients of kidneys from donors aged more than 60 years versus well-matched recipients of younger kidney donors. Patients were retrospectively subdivided into 3 groups. Immediate graft function (IGF), DGF without dialysis (DGF-ND), DGF requiring dialysis (DGF-D). DGF-ND and DGF-D occurred more frequently among 198 older than 198 younger donors (P = .016 and P = .044, respectively). The 5-year patient (96% vs 93%) and pure graft (96% vs 89%) survivals were significantly better in younger recipients, while the incidence of acute rejection was similar. After a mean follow-up of 66 +/- 44 months in older donor recipients, the graft survival was significantly better among IGF than patients in the DGF-ND (P = .046) or DGF-D (P = .003) groups. Instead, in younger recipients there was no difference in graft survival between IGD and DGF-ND. Only patients with DGF-D showed a significantly worse outcome. Upon multivariate analysis of older donors, their recipients, showed the pattern of graft function recovery to be the only variable associated with allograft outcome. Instead in younger donor recipients, acute rejection and time on dialysis were the main variables associated with a poor outcome. In older donor recipients, DGF was an independent variable associated with a poor graft outcome. In younger donor recipients, duration of dialysis and rejection were the most important predictors of poor graft outcomes.     

Induction With Basiliximab in Renal Transplantation

Introduction

The use of monoclonal antibodies in renal transplantation for induction therapy has been associated with a marked reduction in acute rejection rates with an impact on graft and patient survivals.

Objective

We sought to evaluate the efficacy of renal transplant induction protocols using Basiliximab based on the rates of acute rejection episodes (ARE) and delayed graft function (DGF) of infectious complications in the first 6 months posttransplant, as well as patient and graft survivals.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated all renal transplants performed between 2000 and 2008 that were primary grafts from cadaveric heart-beating donors, into recipients with a panel reactive antibody titer <5% and who were treated with an immunosuppression scheme based on cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil/mycophenolic acid plus corticosteroids, with (group 1) or without basiliximab (group 2).

Results

We enrolled 52 recipients in group 1 (induction with basiliximab) and 189 in group 2 (without basiliximab). The baseline characteristics were similar among the groups, except for time on dialysis which was longer in group 1 and the number of HLA matches, which was lower in group 1. The ARE rate was lower among group 1 (7.8% vs 27.8%; P = .001); rates of DGF and infectious complications were similar. There was no significant difference in graft and patient survivals.

Conclusion

In this study, induction with basiliximab was associated with a reduced rate rate of ARE, despite a lower number of HLA matches and a longer previous time on dialysis. The use of this induction modality was not associated with a greater rate of infectious complications.     

Basiliximab does not reduce the early rejection incidence in high-risk kidney recipients under tacrolimus-based immunosuppression

This study sought to evaluate the benefit of addition of basiliximab to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression among high-risk renal transplantations. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of the basiliximab induction group (n = 55) and a risk-matched control group (n = 57). Graft survivals rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 100%, 98.1%, and 91.8%, respectively, for the control and 96.2%, 93.9%, and 76.4%, respectively, for the basiliximab group (P = .083). Patient survivals rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 98.3%, 98.3%, and 98.3%, respectively, for the control group and 98.2%, 94.2%, and 94.2%, respectively, for the basiliximab group (P = .277). Biopsy-proven acute rejection (AR) within 12 months occurred among 24.6% and 18.2% for the control and induction groups, respectively (P = .492). Serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were 1.23 +/- 0.30, 1.38 +/- 0.41, 1.47 +/- 0.61, and 1.44 +/- 0.67 mg/dL, respectively, among the control and 1.24 +/- 0.28, 1.40 +/- 0.38, 1.40 +/- 0.36, and 1.63 +/- 1.62 mg/dL, respectively, among the induction group. In conclusion, this study showed that the addition of basiliximab to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression did not further improve the results of high-risk kidney transplantations in terms of reducing AR, prolonging graft survival, or improving renal function.     

Successful use of 6 antigen HLA mismatched kidneys for cadaveric renal transplantation

PURPOSE: We retrospectively evaluated the outcome of transplantation with kidneys with 6 antigen HLA mismatches. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 1990 to September 2001, 1,270 cadaveric renal transplants were performed at our center, including 33 (2.59%) involving recipients of kidneys with 6 antigen HLA mismatches. Mean recipient age +/- SD was 40.2 +/- 14.4 years. Of the 33 recipients 19 were male, 14 were female, 31 received an initial transplant, 4 had diabetes and 6 had panel-reactive antibodies of greater than 10%. Mean donor age was 30.3 +/- 13.7 years and mean cold ischemia time was 22.9 +/- 7.8 hours. All recipients had negative current and previous B and T-cell lymphocytotoxicity cross-matching and all received a triple immunosuppression regimen consisting of the calcineurin inhibitor cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with steroids and azathioprine. RESULTS: One-year patient and graft survival was 93.3% and 93.7%, respectively. Of the 33 grafts 31 (94%) functioned immediately. During the mean followup of 3.31 years 10 grafts (30%) were lost, including 6 (60%) due to death with a functioning graft and 4 due to chronic rejection. Acute rejection in 8 patients (24%) was reversed in 7 by steroid pulses. No graft was lost to acute rejection. Technical complications included wound infection in 2 patients (6%), transplant-ureteral obstruction in 1 (3%) and a urinary fistula in 1 (3%). CONCLUSIONS: Kidneys with 6 antigen HLA mismatches can be used effectively.