Genetic deletion of MT1 and MT2 melatonin receptors differentially abrogates the development and expression of methamphetamine‐induced locomotor sensitization during the day and the night in C3H/HeN mice

Abstract: This study explored the role of the melatonin receptors in methamphetamine (METH)‐induced locomotor sensitization during the light and dark phases in C3H/HeN mice with genetic deletion of the MT₁ and/or MT₂ melatonin receptors. Six daily treatments with METH (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) in a novel environment during the light phase led to the development of locomotor sensitization in wild‐type (WT), MT₁KO and MT₂KO mice. Following four full days of abstinence, METH challenge (1.2 mg/kg, i.p.) triggered the expression of locomotor sensitization in METH‐pretreated but not in vehicle (VEH)‐pretreated mice. In MT₁/MT₂KO mice, the development of sensitization during the light phase was significantly reduced and the expression of sensitization was completely abrogated upon METH challenge. During the dark phase the development of locomotor sensitization in METH‐pretreated WT, MT₁KO and MT₂KO mice was statistically different from VEH‐treated controls. However, WT and MT₂KO, but not MT₁KO mice receiving repeated VEH pretreatments during the dark phase expressed a sensitized response to METH challenge that is of an identical magnitude to that observed upon 6 days of METH pretreatment. We conclude that exposure to a novel environment during the dark phase, but not during the light phase, facilitated the expression of sensitization to a METH challenge in a manner dependent on MT₁ melatonin receptor activation by endogenous melatonin. We suggest that MT₁ and MT₂ melatonin receptors are potential targets for pharmacotherapeutic intervention in METH abusers.     

Detection of recombinant and endogenous mouse melatonin receptors by monoclonal antibodies targeting the C‐terminal domain

Melatonin receptors play important roles in the regulation of circadian and seasonal rhythms, sleep, retinal functions, the immune system, depression, and type 2 diabetes development. Melatonin receptors are approved drug targets for insomnia, non‐24‐hour sleep‐wake disorders, and major depressive disorders. In mammals, two melatonin receptors (MTRs) exist, MT₁ and MT₂, belonging to the G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily. Similar to most other GPCRs, reliable antibodies recognizing melatonin receptors proved to be difficult to obtain. Here, we describe the development of the first monoclonal antibodies (mABs) for mouse MT₁ and MT₂. Purified antibodies were extensively characterized for specific reactivity with mouse, rat, and human MT₁ and MT₂ by Western blot, immunoprecipitation, immunofluorescence, and proximity ligation assay. Several mABs were specific for either mouse MT₁ or MT₂. None of the mABs cross‐reacted with rat MTRs, and some were able to react with human MTRs. The specificity of the selected mABs was validated by immunofluorescence microscopy in three established locations (retina, suprachiasmatic nuclei, pituitary gland) for MTR expression in mice using MTR‐KO mice as control. MT₂ expression was not detected in mouse insulinoma MIN6 cells or pancreatic beta‐cells. Collectively, we report the first monoclonal antibodies recognizing recombinant and native mouse melatonin receptors that will be valuable tools for future studies.     

Protection of melatonin in experimental models of newborn hypoxic‐ischemic brain injury through MT1 receptor

The function of melatonin as a protective agent against newborn hypoxic‐ischemic (H‐I) brain injury is not yet well studied, and the mechanisms by which melatonin causes neuroprotection in neurological diseases are still evolving. This study was designed to investigate whether expression of MT1 receptors is reduced in newborn H‐I brain injury and whether the protective action of melatonin is by alterations of the MT1 receptors. We demonstrated that there was significant reduction in MT1 receptors in ischemic brain of mouse pups in vivo following H‐I brain injury and that melatonin offers neuroprotection through upregulation of MT1 receptors. The role of MT1 receptors was further supported by observation of increased mortality in MT1 knockout mice following H‐I brain injury and the reversal of the inhibitory role of melatonin on mitochondrial cell death pathways by the melatonin receptor antagonist, luzindole. These data demonstrate that melatonin mediates its neuroprotective effect in mouse models of newborn H‐I brain injury, at least in part, by the restoration of MT1 receptors, the inhibition of mitochondrial cell death pathways and the suppression of astrocytic and microglial activation.     

Sleep well. Untangling the role of melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors in sleep

The pharmacological potential of targeting selectively melatonin MT1 or MT2 receptors has not yet been exploited in medicine. Research using selective MT1/MT2 receptor ligands and MT1/MT2 receptor knockout mice has indicated that the activation of MT2 receptors selectively increases non‐rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep whereas MT1 receptors seem mostly implicated in the regulation of REM sleep. Moreover, MT1 knockout mice show an increase in NREM sleep, while MT2 knockout a decrease, suggesting an opposite role of these two receptors. A recent paper in mice by Sharma et al (J Pineal Res, 2018, e12498) found that MT1 but not MT2 receptors are expressed on orexin neurons in the perifornical lateral hypothalamus (PFH). Moreover, after injecting melatonin or luzindole into the mouse PFH, the authors suggest that melatonin promotes NREM sleep because activates PFH MT1 receptors, which in turn inhibit orexin neurons that are important in promoting arousal and maintaining wakefulness. In this commentary, we have critically commented on some of these findings on the bases of previous literature. In addition, we highlighted the fact that no conclusions could be drawn on the melatonin receptor subtype mediating the effects of melatonin on sleep because the authors used the non‐selective MT1/MT2 receptors antagonist luzindole. More solid research should further characterize the pharmacological function of these two melatonin receptors in sleep.     

Melatonin‐mediated inhibition of Purkinje neuron P‐type Ca2+ channels in vitro induces neuronal hyperexcitability through the phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase‐dependent protein kinase C delta pathway

Although melatonin receptors are widely expressed in the mammalian central nervous system and peripheral tissues, there are limited data regarding the functions of melatonin in cerebellar Purkinje cells. Here, we identified a novel functional role of melatonin in modulating P‐type Ca²⁺ channels and action‐potential firing in rat Purkinje neurons. Melatonin at 0.1 μm reversibly decreased peak currents (I_Ba) by 32.9%. This effect was melatonin receptor 1 (MT_R1) dependent and was associated with a hyperpolarizing shift in the voltage dependence of inactivation. Pertussis toxin pretreatment, intracellular application of QEHA peptide, and a selective antibody raised against the G_β subunit prevented the inhibitory effects of melatonin. Pretreatment with phosphatidylinositol 3‐kinase (PI3K) inhibitors abolished the melatonin‐induced decrease in I_Ba. Surprisingly, melatonin responses were not regulated by Akt, a common downstream target of PI3K. Melatonin treatment significantly increased protein kinase C (PKC) activity 2.1‐fold. Antagonists of PKC, but not of protein kinase A, abolished the melatonin‐induced decrease in I_Ba. Melatonin application increased the membrane abundance of PKC_δ, and PKC_δ inhibition (either pharmacologically or genetically) abolished the melatonin‐induced I_Ba response. Functionally, melatonin increased spontaneous action‐potential firing by 53.0%; knockdown of MT_R1 and blockade of P‐type channels abolished this effect. Thus, our results suggest that melatonin inhibits P‐type channels through MT_R1 activation, which is coupled sequentially to the βγ subunits of G_i/o‐protein and to downstream PI3K‐dependent PKC_δ signaling. This likely contributes to its physiological functions, including spontaneous firing of cerebellar Purkinje neurons.     

Enhancement of high glucose‐induced PINK1 expression by melatonin stimulates neuronal cell survival: Involvement of MT2/Akt/NF‐κB pathway

Hyperglycemia is a representative hallmark and risk factor for diabetes mellitus (DM) and is closely linked to DM‐associated neuronal cell death. Previous investigators reported on a genome‐wide association study and showed relationships between DM and melatonin receptor (MT), highlighting the role of MT signaling by assessing melatonin in DM. However, the role of MT signaling in DM pathogenesis is unclear. Therefore, we investigated the role of mitophagy regulators in high glucose‐induced neuronal cell death and the effect of melatonin against high glucose‐induced mitophagy regulators in neuronal cells. In our results, high glucose significantly increased PTEN‐induced putative kinase 1 (PINK1) and LC‐3B expressions; as well it decreased cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 expression and Mitotracker? fluorescence intensity. Silencing of PINK1 induced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and mitochondrial membrane potential impairment, increased expressions of cleaved caspases, and increased the number of annexin V‐positive cells. In addition, high glucose‐stimulated melatonin receptor 1B (MTNR1B) mRNA and PINK1 expressions were reversed by ROS scavenger N‐acetyl cysteine pretreatment. Upregulation of PINK1 expression in neuronal cells is suppressed by pretreatment with MT₂ receptor‐specific inhibitor 4‐P‐PDOT. We further showed melatonin stimulated Akt phosphorylation, which was followed by nuclear factor kappa‐light‐chain‐enhancer of activated B cells (NF‐κB) phosphorylation and nuclear translocation. Silencing of PINK1 expression abolished melatonin‐regulated mitochondrial ROS production, cleaved caspase‐3 and caspase‐9 expressions, and the number of annexin V‐positive cells. In conclusion, we have demonstrated the melatonin stimulates PINK1 expression via an MT₂/Akt/NF‐κB pathway, and such stimulation is important for the prevention of neuronal cell apoptosis under high glucose conditions.     

Protein interactome mining defines melatonin MT1 receptors as integral component of presynaptic protein complexes of neurons

In mammals, the hormone melatonin is mainly produced by the pineal gland with nocturnal peak levels. Its peripheral and central actions rely either on its intrinsic antioxidant properties or on binding to melatonin MT₁ and MT₂ receptors, belonging to the G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) super‐family. Melatonin has been reported to be involved in many functions of the central nervous system such as circadian rhythm regulation, neurotransmission, synaptic plasticity, memory, sleep, and also in Alzheimer's disease and depression. However, little is known about the subcellular localization of melatonin receptors and the molecular aspects involved in neuronal functions of melatonin. Identification of protein complexes associated with GPCRs has been shown to be a valid approach to improve our understanding of their function. By combining proteomic and genomic approaches we built an interactome of MT₁ and MT₂ receptors, which comprises 378 individual proteins. Among the proteins interacting with MT₁, but not with MT₂, we identified several presynaptic proteins, suggesting a potential role of MT₁ in neurotransmission. Presynaptic localization of MT₁ receptors in the hypothalamus, striatum, and cortex was confirmed by subcellular fractionation experiments and immunofluorescence microscopy. MT₁ physically interacts with the voltage‐gated calcium channel Ca_v2.2 and inhibits Ca_v2.2‐promoted Ca²⁺ entry in an agonist‐independent manner. In conclusion, we show that MT₁ is part of the presynaptic protein network and negatively regulates Ca_v2.2 activity, providing a first hint for potential synaptic functions of MT₁.     

Molecular deficiency (ies) in MT1 melatonin signaling pathway underlies the melatonin‐unresponsive phenotype in MDA‐MB‐231 human breast cancer cells

Melatonin has been shown repeatedly to inhibit the growth of human breast tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Its antiproliferative effects have been well studied in MCF‐7 human breast cancer cells and several other estrogen receptor α (ERα)‐positive human breast cancer cell lines. However, the MDA‐MB‐231 breast cancer cell line, an ERα‐negative cell line widely used in breast cancer research, has been shown to be unresponsive to melatonin's growth‐suppressive effect in vitro. Here, we examined the effect of melatonin on the cell proliferation of several ERα‐negative breast cancer cell lines including MDA‐MB‐231, BT‐20, and SK‐BR‐3 cells. Although the MT1 G‐protein‐coupled receptor is expressed in all three cell lines, melatonin significantly suppressed the proliferation of SK‐BR‐3 cells without having any significant effect on the growth of MDA‐MB‐231 and BT‐20 cells. We confirmed that the MT1‐associated Gα proteins are expressed in MDA‐MB‐231 cells. Further studies demonstrated that the melatonin unresponsiveness in MDA‐MB‐231 cells may be caused by aberrant signaling downstream of the Gαi proteins, resulting in differential regulation of ERK1/2 activity.     

Nociceptive responses in melatonin MT2 receptor knockout mice compared to MT1 and double MT1/MT2 receptor knockout mice

Melatonin, a neurohormone that binds to two G protein-coupled receptors MT₁ and MT_2, is involved in pain regulation, but the distinct role of each receptor has yet to be defined. We characterized the nociceptive responses of mice with genetic inactivation of melatonin MT₁ (MT₁^−/−), or MT₂ (MT₂^−/−), or both MT₁/MT₂ (MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/−) receptors in the hot plate test (HPT), and the formalin test (FT). In HPT and FT, MT₁^−/− display no differences compared to their wild-type littermates (CTL), whereas both MT₂^−/− and MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/− mice showed a reduced thermal sensitivity and a decreased tonic nocifensive behavior during phase 2 of the FT in the light phase. The MT₂ partial agonist UCM924 induced an antinociceptive effect in MT₁^−/− but not in MT₂^−/− and MT₁^−/−/MT₂^−/− mice. Also, the competitive opioid antagonist naloxone had no effects in CTL, whereas it induced a decrease of nociceptive thresholds in MT₂^−/− mice. Our results show that the genetic inactivation of melatonin MT₂, but not MT₁ receptors, produces a distinct effect on nociceptive threshold, suggesting that the melatonin MT₂ receptor subtype is selectively involved in the regulation of pain responses.     

Melatonin‐mediated inhibition of Cav3.2 T‐type Ca2+ channels induces sensory neuronal hypoexcitability through the novel protein kinase C‐eta isoform

Recent studies implicate melatonin in the antinociceptive activity of sensory neurons. However, the underlying mechanisms are still largely unknown. Here, we identify a critical role of melatonin in functionally regulating Cav3.2 T‐type Ca²⁺ channels (T‐type channel) in trigeminal ganglion (TG) neurons. Melatonin inhibited T‐type channels in small TG neurons via the melatonin receptor 2 (MT₂ receptor) and a pertussis toxin‐sensitive G‐protein pathway. Immunoprecipitation analyses revealed that the intracellular subunit of the MT₂ receptor coprecipitated with Gα_o. Both shRNA‐mediated knockdown of Gα_o and intracellular application of QEHA peptide abolished the inhibitory effects of melatonin. Protein kinase C (PKC) antagonists abolished the melatonin‐induced T‐type channel response, whereas inhibition of conventional PKC isoforms elicited no effect. Furthermore, application of melatonin increased membrane abundance of PKC‐eta (PKC_η) while antagonism of PKC_η or shRNA targeting PKC_η prevented the melatonin‐mediated effects. In a heterologous expression system, activation of MT₂ receptor strongly inhibited Cav3.2 T‐type channel currents but had no effect on Cav3.1 and Cav3.3 current amplitudes. The selective Cav3.2 response was PKC_η dependent and was accompanied by a negative shift in the steady‐state inactivation curve. Furthermore, melatonin decreased the action potential firing rate of small TG neurons and attenuated the mechanical hypersensitivity in a mouse model of complete Freund's adjuvant‐induced inflammatory pain. These actions were inhibited by T‐type channel blockade. Together, our results demonstrated that melatonin inhibits Cav3.2 T‐type channel activity through the MT₂ receptor coupled to novel G_βγ‐mediated PKC_η signaling, subsequently decreasing the membrane excitability of TG neurons and pain hypersensitivity in mice.     

Melatonin influences somatostatin secretion from human pancreatic δ‐cells via MT1 and MT2 receptors

Melatonin is an effector of the diurnal clock on pancreatic islets. The membrane receptor‐transmitted inhibitory influence of melatonin on insulin secretion is well established and contrasts with the reported stimulation of glucagon release from α‐cells. Virtually, nothing is known concerning the melatonin‐mediated effects on islet δ‐cells. Analysis of a human pancreatic δ‐cell model, the cell line QGP‐1, and the use of a somatostatin‐specific radioimmunoassay showed that melatonin primarily has an inhibitory effect on somatostatin secretion in the physiological concentration range. In the pharmacological range, melatonin elicited slightly increased somatostatin release from δ‐cells. Cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) is the major second messenger dose‐dependently stimulating somatostatin secretion, in experiments employing the membrane‐permeable 8‐Br‐cAMP. 8‐Br‐cyclic guanosine monophosphate proved to be of only minor relevance to somatostatin release. As the inhibitory effect of 1 nm melatonin was reversed after incubation of QGP‐1 cells with the nonselective melatonin receptor antagonist luzindole, but not with the MT2‐selective antagonist 4‐P‐PDOT (4‐phenyl‐2‐propionamidotetraline), an involvement of the MT1 receptor can be assumed. Somatostatin release from the δ‐cells at low glucose concentrations was significantly inhibited during co‐incubation with 1 nm melatonin, an effect which was less pronounced at higher glucose levels. Transient expression experiments, overexpressing MT1, MT2, or a deletion variant as a control, indicated that the MT1 and not the MT2 receptor was the major transmitter of the inhibitory melatonin effect. These data point to a significant influence of melatonin on pancreatic δ‐cells and on somatostatin release.     

Melatonin enhances the human mesenchymal stem cells motility via melatonin receptor 2 coupling with Gαq in skin wound healing

Melatonin, a circadian rhythm–promoting molecule, has a variety of biological functions, but the functional role of melatonin in the motility of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has yet to be studied. In a mouse skin excisional wound model, we found that transplantation of umbilical cord blood (UCB)‐MSCs pretreated with melatonin enhanced wound closure, granulation, and re‐epithelialization at mouse skin wound sites, where relatively more UCB‐MSCs which were engrafted onto the wound site were detected. Thus, we identified the signaling pathway of melatonin, which affects the motility of UCB‐MSCs. Melatonin (1 μm ) significantly increased the motility of UCB‐MSCs, which had been inhibited by the knockdown of melatonin receptor 2 (MT₂). We found that Gαq coupled with MT₂ and that the binding of Gαq to MT₂ uniquely stimulated an atypical PKC isoform, PKCζ. Melatonin induced the phosphorylation of FAK and paxillin, which were concurrently downregulated by blocking of the PKC activity. Melatonin increased the levels of active Cdc42 and Arp2/3, and it has the ability to stimulate cytoskeletal reorganization‐related proteins such as profilin‐1, cofilin‐1, and F‐actin in UCB‐MSCs. Finally, a lack of MT₂ expression in UCB‐MSCs during a mouse skin transplantation experiment resulted in impaired wound healing and less engraftment of stem cells at the wound site. These results demonstrate that melatonin signaling via MT₂ triggers FAK/paxillin phosphorylation to stimulate reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton, which is responsible for Cdc42/Arp2/3 activation to promote UCB‐MSCs motility.     

Melatonin receptor ligands: A pharmaco-chemical perspective

Melatonin MT₁ and MT₂ receptor ligands have been vigorously explored for the last 4 decades. Inspection of approximately 80 publications in the field revealed that most melatonergic ligands were structural analogues of melatonin combining three essential features of the parent compound: an aromatic ring bearing a methoxy group and an amide side chain in a relative arrangement similar to that present in melatonin. While several series of MT₂-selective agents—agonists, antagonists, or partial agonists—were reported, the field was lacking MT₁-selective agents. Herein, we describe various approaches toward the development of melatonergic ligands, keeping in mind that most of the molecules/pharmacophores obtained were essentially melatonin copies, even though diverse tri- or tetra-cyclic compounds were explored. In addition to lack of structural diversity, only few studies examined the activity of the reported melatonergic ligands in vivo. Moreover, an extensive pharmacological characterization including biopharmaceutical stability, pharmacokinetic properties, specificity toward other major receptors to name a few remained scarce. For example, many of the antagonists described were not stable in vivo, were not selective for the melatonin receptor subtype of interest, and were not fully characterized from a pharmacological standpoint. Indeed, virtual screening of large compound libraries has led to the recent discovery of potent and selective melatonin receptor agonists and partial agonists of new chemotypes. Having said this, the melatonergic field is still lacking subtype-selective melatonin receptor antagonists “active” in vivo, which are critical to our understanding of melatonin and melatonin receptors’ role in basic physiology and disease.     

Anatomical and cellular localization of melatonin MT1 and MT2 receptors in the adult rat brain

The involvement of melatonin in mammalian brain pathophysiology has received growing interest, but information about the anatomical distribution of its two G‐protein‐coupled receptors, MT₁ and MT₂, remains elusive. In this study, using specific antibodies, we examined the precise distribution of both melatonin receptors immunoreactivity across the adult rat brain using light, confocal, and electron microscopy. Our results demonstrate a selective MT₁ and MT₂ localization on neuronal cell bodies and dendrites in numerous regions of the rat telencephalon, diencephalon, and mesencephalon. Confocal and ultrastructural examination confirmed the somatodendritic nature of MT₁ and MT₂ receptors, both being localized on neuronal membranes. Overall, striking differences were observed in the anatomical distribution pattern of MT₁ and MT₂ proteins, and the labeling often appeared complementary in regions displaying both receptors. Somadendrites labeled for MT₁ were observed for instance in the retrosplenial cortex, the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus, the islands of Calleja, the medial habenula, the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the superior colliculus, the substantia nigra pars compacta, the dorsal raphe nucleus, and the pars tuberalis of the pituitary gland. Somadendrites endowed with MT₂ receptors were mostly observed in the CA3 field of the hippocampus, the reticular thalamic nucleus, the supraoptic nucleus, the inferior colliculus, the substantia nigra pars reticulata, and the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. Together, these data provide the first detailed neurocytological mapping of melatonin receptors in the adult rat brain, an essential prerequisite for a better understanding of melatonin distinct receptor function and neurophysiology.     

Placental melatonin system is present throughout pregnancy and regulates villous trophoblast differentiation

Melatonin is highly produced in the placenta where it protects against molecular damage and cellular dysfunction arising from hypoxia/re‐oxygenation‐induced oxidative stress as observed in primary cultures of syncytiotrophoblast. However, little is known about melatonin and its receptors in the human placenta throughout pregnancy and their role in villous trophoblast development. The purpose of this study was to determine melatonin‐synthesizing enzymes, arylalkylamine N‐acetyltransferase (AANAT) and hydroxyindole O‐methyltransferase (HIOMT), and melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) expression throughout pregnancy as well as the role of melatonin and its receptors in villous trophoblast syncytialization. Our data show that the melatonin generating system is expressed throughout pregnancy (from week 7 to term) in placental tissues. AANAT and HIOMT show maximal expression at the 3rd trimester of pregnancy. MT1 receptor expression is maximal at the 1st trimester compared to the 2nd and 3rd trimesters, while MT2 receptor expression does not change significantly during pregnancy. Moreover, during primary villous cytotrophoblast syncytialization, MT1 receptor expression increases, while MT2 receptor expression decreases. Treatment of primary villous cytotrophoblast with an increasing concentration of melatonin (10 pm –1 mm ) increases the fusion index (syncytium formation; 21% augmentation at 1 mm melatonin vs. vehicle) and β‐hCG secretion (121% augmentation at 1 mm melatonin vs. vehicle). This effect of melatonin appears to be mediated via its MT1 and MT2 receptors. In sum, melatonin machinery (synthetizing enzymes and receptors) is expressed in human placenta throughout pregnancy and promotes syncytium formation, suggesting an essential role of this indolamine in placental function and pregnancy well‐being.     

The inhibition of apoptosis by melatonin in VSC4.1 motoneurons exposed to oxidative stress,glutamate excitotoxicity,or TNF‐α toxicity involves membrane melatonin receptors

Abstract: Loss of motoneurons may underlie some of the deficits in motor function associated with the central nervous system (CNS) injuries and diseases. We tested whether melatonin, a potent antioxidant and free radical scavenger, would prevent motoneuron apoptosis following exposure to toxins and whether this neuroprotection is mediated by melatonin receptors. Exposure of VSC4.1 motoneurons to either 50 μm H₂O₂, 25 μm glutamate (LGA), or 50 ng/mL tumor necrosis factor‐alpha (TNF‐α) for 24 h caused significant increases in apoptosis, as determined by Wright staining and ApopTag assay. Analyses of mRNA and proteins showed increased expression and activities of stress kinases and cysteine proteases and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential during apoptosis. These insults also caused increases in intracellular free [Ca²⁺] and activities of calpain and caspases. Cells exposed to stress stimuli for 15 min were then treated with 200 nm melatonin. Post‐treatment of cells with melatonin attenuated production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and phosphorylation of p38, MAPK, and JNK1, prevented cell death, and maintained whole‐cell membrane potential, indicating functional neuroprotection. Melatonin receptors (MT1 and MT2) were upregulated following treatment with melatonin. To confirm the involvement of MT1 and MT2 in providing neuroprotection, cells were post‐treated (20 min) with 10 μm luzindole (melatonin receptor antagonist). Luzindole significantly attenuated melatonin‐induced neuroprotection, suggesting that melatonin worked, at least in part, via its receptors to prevent VSC4.1 motoneuron apoptosis. Results suggest that neuroprotection rendered by melatonin to motoneurons is receptor mediated and melatonin may be an effective neuroprotective agent to attenuate motoneuron death in CNS injuries and diseases.     

A new melatonin receptor ligand with mt1-agonist and MT2-antagonist properties

It has been difficult, so far, to obtain melatonin analogs possessing high selectivity for the respective melatonin receptors, mt1 and MT2. In the present work, we report the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of a new compound N‐{2‐[5‐(2‐hydroxyethoxy)‐1H‐indol‐3‐yl)] ethyl} acetamide or 5‐hydroxyethoxy‐N‐acetyltryptamine (5‐HEAT). To assess the activity of the compound, the following tests were performed: affinity determination for the high‐ and low‐affinity receptor states (2‐[ I]iodomelatonin binding), potency and intrinsic activity in inducing G protein activation ([ S]GTPγS binding assay). 5‐HEAT showed little selectivity for the mt1 receptor, with pKi values of 7.77 for mt1 and 7.12 for the MT2 receptors, respectively. 5‐HEAT was able to differentiate between the high‐ and the low‐affinity receptor states in the mt1 but not in the MT2 receptor. 5‐HEAT induced a high level of G protein activation when acting through the mt1 receptor, with a relative intrinsic activity of 0.92. On the contrary, it elicited only minimal MT2 receptor‐mediated G protein activation, with a relative intrinsic activity of 0.16, and was also able to inhibit the melatonin‐induced MT2 receptor‐mediated G protein activation, with a pKB value of 7.4. In conclusion, it appears that 5‐HEAT possesses very different efficacies at the two melatonin receptors, behaving as a full melatonin receptor agonist at the mt1 and as an antagonist/weak partial agonist at the MT2 receptor. Therefore, it is a promising ligand for use in functional studies aimed at distinguishing between the effects mediated by the different melatonin receptors in the human.