Treatment of Small Hepatocellular Carcinoma (≤2 cm) in the Caudate Lobe with Sequential Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation

Purpose

To evaluate technical feasibility and treatment results of sequential transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and cone-beam computed tomography-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (CBCT-RFA) for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the caudate lobe.

Materials and Methods

Institutional review board approved this retrospective study. Radiologic database was searched for the patients referred to perform TACE and CBCT-RFA for small caudate HCCs (≤2 cm) between February 2009 and February 2014. A total of 14 patients (12 men and 2 women, mean age; 61.3 years) were included. Percutaneous ultrasonography-guided RFA (pUS-RFA) and surgery were infeasible due to poor conspicuity, inconspicuity or no safe electrode pathway, and poor hepatic reserve. Procedural success (completion of both TACE and CBCT-RFA), technique efficacy (absence of tumor enhancement at 1 month after treatment), and complication were evaluated. Treatment results including local tumor progression (LTP), intrahepatic distant recurrence (IDR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

Results

Procedural success and technique efficacy rates were 78.6 % (11/14) and 90.9 % (10/11), respectively. Average follow-up period was 45.3 months (range, 13.4–64.6 months). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year LTP probabilities were 0, 12.5, and 12.5 %, respectively. IDR occurred in seven patients (63.6 %, 7/11). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year PFS probabilities were 81.8, 51.9, and 26 %, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS probabilities were 100, 80.8, and 80.8 %, respectively.

Conclusion

Combination of TACE and CBCT-RFA seems feasible for small HCC in the caudate lobe not amenable to pUS-RFA and effective in local tumor control.

     

Transarterial Chemoembolization Monotherapy Versus Combined Transarterial Chemoembolization–Microwave Ablation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tumors ≤5 cm: A Propensity Analysis at a Single Center

Purpose

To compare effectiveness of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with microwave ablation (MWA; TACE–MWA) with TACE alone for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors ≤5 cm.

Materials and Methods

We reviewed data of 244 patients treated for HCC by TACE–MWA or TACE from June 2014 to December 2015. Median follow-up period was 505 days (TACE–MWA group: 485 days; TACE group: 542 days). Patients were propensity score matched (1:2 ratio); outcomes of TACE–MWA and TACE groups were compared. Primary endpoints were tumor responses, including tumor necrosis rates after initial treatment, tumor responses at 6 months [per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST)], and time to tumor progression (TTP). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and re-intervention times.

Results

After initial treatments, tumor necrosis rates were higher in the TACE–MWA group (n = 48; 92.1% [58/63]) than the TACE group (n = 96; 46.3% [56/121]; P < 0.001). At 6 months’ follow-up, the TACE–MWA group had better tumor responses (CR + PR + SD [per mRECIST]: TACE–MWA, 95.8%; TACE, 64.5%; P < 0.001). The TACE–MWA group had better TTP (P < 0.001), but did not significantly differ in OS (P = 0.317). TACE–MWA decreased re-TACE times from 1.90 to 0.52; and re-MWA times from 0.22 to 0.17. In subgroup analysis, TACE–MWA also showed better TTP in patients with tumors ≤3 cm (P < 0.001) and 3–5 cm (P = 0.004).

Conclusions

Compared with TACE, TACE–MWA leads to better responses for HCC tumors ≤5 cm.

     

Clinical Evaluation of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization with 2-Day-soluble Gelatin Sponge Particles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma—Comparison with Insoluble Gelatin Sponge Particles

PurposeTo compare therapeutic effect, adverse events, and embolized hepatic artery impairment in transcatheter arterial chemoembolization between Lipiodol plus insoluble gelatin sponge particles (Gelpart) and Lipiodol plus 2-day-soluble gelatin sponge particles (2DS-GSPs).Materials and MethodsIn a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were assigned to the 2DS-GSP group or the Gelpart group. Radiographic response at 3 months per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors was evaluated as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were safety (per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0) within 3 months and hepatic branch artery impairment at the time of repeat chemoembolization (grade 0, no damage; grade I, mild vessel wall irregularity; grade II, overt stenosis; grade III, occlusion of more peripheral branch artery than subsegmental artery; grade IV, occlusion of subsegmental artery). Grade II, III, or IV indicated significant hepatic artery impairment.ResultsThirty-seven patients with 143 nodules were randomized to the 2DS-GSP group and 36 patients with 137 nodules were randomized to the Gelpart group. No significant differences in patient background existed between groups. Target lesion response and overall tumor response in the 2DS-GSP and Gelpart groups were 77.7% versus 76.9% and 78.3% versus 77.8%, respectively, with no significant differences. No significant difference in adverse events existed between groups. Hepatic artery impairment was observed in 5% of patients in the 2DS-GSP group (n = 32) and in 16% in the Gelpart group (n = 33; P< .001).ConclusionsTranscatheter arterial chemoembolization with 2DS-GSPs resulted in the same therapeutic and adverse effects as chemoembolization with Gelpart while causing significantly less hepatic artery impairment.     

Locoregional Therapy of Hepatocellular-Cholangiocarcinoma versus Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score–Matched Study

PurposeTo compare outcomes of unresectable hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (HCC-CC) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional therapy (LRT).Materials and MethodsConsecutive patients with histologically confirmed HCC-CC or HCC treated with LRT between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Ten patients (8 men; median age, 60 y) with 12 HCC-CCs (mean diameter, 4.2 cm ± 1.9; mean number, 3.7 ± 3.3) treated with chemoembolization (n = 6), yttrium-90 radioembolization (n = 2), RF ablation (n = 1), or chemoembolization/RF ablation (n = 1) were compared with 124 patients (92 men; median age, 59 y) with 134 HCCs (mean diameter, 4.8 cm ± 4.0; mean number, 2.6 ± 2.2) treated with chemoembolization (n = 51), yttrium-90 radioembolization (n = 17), RF ablation (n = 41), or chemoembolization/RF ablation (n = 15). Propensity score–matched analysis with conditional logistic regression adjusted for age, sex, LRT modality, tumor-specific features, and Child-Pugh class. Tumor-volume doubling time (TVDT) before LRT and objective response rates were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and Fisher exact test; progression-free survival (PFS) and transplant-free survival (TFS) were compared by Cox proportional hazards model.ResultsOn univariate analysis, HCC-CC was associated with lower median TVDT (2.4 months vs 5.2 months, P = .03), objective response (30% vs 71%, P = .01), and median PFS (2.4 months vs 7.4 months, HR 4.3, 95% CI 2.2–8.4, P < .0001). Propensity score–matched analysis demonstrated greater distant progression (60% vs 30%, P = .003) and significantly shorter median PFS (2.4 months vs 6.0 months, HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.3–8.9, P = .017) for HCC-CC. No significant difference was observed in TFS (7.5 months vs 13.8 months, HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.4–6.1).ConclusionsHCC-CC was associated with reduced PFS and greater distant progression after LRT compared with HCC, indicating a need for adjunctive treatment strategies to improve outcomes.     

Balloon-Occluded Transarterial Chemoembolization for the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center US Preliminary Experience

This report describes a single-center experience with balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization for liver-directed therapy. A total of 26 patients (11 male, 4 female; mean age, 65 y ± 7) with 28 tumors (mean diameter, 2.7 cm; range, 1.1–5.9 cm) were treated. Technical success rate was 100% (28 of 28 cases), with 1 minor complication of left portal vein thrombosis and small liver infarct. Of the 15 tumors analyzed for response, 60% (9 of 15) exhibited complete response, 33.3% (5 of 15) exhibited partial response, and 6.6% (1 of 15) had stable disease on follow-up. Eight patients exhibited overall progression with a new hepatic lesion and a median time to progression of 7.9 months (range, 5–11 mo).     

An Economic Analysis of Sublobar Resection versus Thermal Ablation for Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

PurposeTo compare medical costs for a matched-pair cohort of Medicare patients with early-stage non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent treatment with sublobar resection or thermal ablation.Materials and MethodsPatients at least 65 years of age with stage IA/IB NSCLC treated with sublobar resection or thermal ablation from 2007 to 2009 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results/Medicare–linked data and matched by propensity scores. The primary outcome of interest, cost from the payer’s perspective, was derived from Medicare claims data. A partitioned inverse probability-weighted estimator was used to calculate mean and median treatment-related costs and costs at 1, 3, 12, 18, and 24 months after treatment. Baseline characteristics, Kaplan–Meier survival curves, and calculated cost variables were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe final matched cohort of 128 patients had similar baseline characteristics and overall survival (P = .52). Patients who underwent ablation had significantly lower treatment-related costs than those who underwent sublobar resection (P < .001). The difference in median treatment-related cost was $16,105. At 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after treatment, cumulative costs remained significantly different (P ≤ .011). Lower cost associated with ablations performed in the outpatient setting was a major contributor to the differences between the two treatment modalities, although inpatient ablations maintained a small cost advantage over sublobar resections.ConclusionsAmong matched Medicare patients with stage I NSCLC, thermal ablation resulted in significantly lower treatment-related costs and cumulative medical costs 1 month, 3 months, and 12 months after treatment compared with sublobar resection.     

Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Hepasphere 30–60 μm. Safety and Efficacy Study

Background

This study examined the safety, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using a newly developed size of a superabsorbent polymer drug-eluting embolic material.

Methods

Forty-five patients with documented HCC (Child–Pugh score A/B: 55.5 %/44.5 %) were embolized with HepaSphere microspheres 30–60 μm with escalation of lesion, dose, and frequency of re-embolization. Local response was evaluated with modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Plasma levels of doxorubicin were measured in 24 patients at baseline and at 5, 20, 40, 60, and 120 min, at 6, 24, and 48 h, and at 7 days, respectively, to determine doxorubicin in plasma (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC). Measurements of three patients who underwent lipiodol-based conventional chemoembolization (c-TACE) were also performed.

Results

TACE with HepaSphere was well tolerated with an acceptable safety profile and no 30-day mortality. Response rates were calculated on intention-to-treat basis with complete response (CR) in 17.8 % reaching 22.2 % for the target lesion. Overall partial response (PR) was seen in 51.1 %, stable disease in 20 %, and progressive disease in 11.1 % of patients. Overall objective response (CR + PR), including patients treated at all dosages of doxorubicin, was seen in 68.9 % of cases. After a median follow-up of 15.6 months, 1-year survival is 100 %. Doxorubicin AUC was significantly lower in patients with HepaSphere 30–60 μm (35,195 ± 27,873 ng × min/ml) than in patients with conventional TACE (103,960 ± 16,652 ng × min/ml; p = 0.009). Cmax was also significantly lower with HepaSphere 30–60 μm (83.9 ± 32.1 ng/ml) compared with c-TACE (761.3 ± 58.8 ng/ml; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

HepaSphere 30–60 μm is an effective drug-eluting embolic material with a favourable pharmacokinetic profile.     

Planning US for Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas (1–3 cm): Value of Fusion Imaging with Conventional US and CT/MR Images

PurposeTo assess whether fusion of conventional ultrasonography (US) with liver computed tomography/magnetic resonance images for planning US for percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation can reduce false-positive detection and enhance lesion detectability of small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) on conventional US.Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board, and informed consent was waived. A total of 137 patients with single HCCs (mean ± standard deviation, 1.7 ± 0.6 cm; range, 1.1–3.0 cm) were included. Planning US was performed by two radiologists by using conventional US first and fusion imaging later in the same session. The false-positive detection rate of conventional US was assessed with the results of fusion imaging used as a reference standard. True-positive detection rates on conventional US and fusion imaging were compared by McNemar test. Initially undetectable HCCs on conventional US that became detectable after image fusion were also assessed.ResultsThe false-positive detection rate of conventional US was 7.7% (nine of 117). Overall true-positive detection rates on conventional US and fusion imaging were 78.8% (108 of 137) and 90.5% (124 of 137), respectively (P = .0002); the rates were significantly different between conventional US and fusion imaging for HCCs smaller than 2.0 cm, but not for HCCs 2.0 cm or larger. Of 20 initially undetectable HCCs on conventional US, nine (45.0%) became detectable after image fusion.ConclusionsFusion imaging for planning US for percutaneous RF ablation can reduce false-positive detection and enhance lesion detectability of small HCCs on conventional US.     

High Epithelial Cell Adhesion Molecule–Positive Circulating Tumor Cell Count Predicts Poor Survival of Patients with Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization

Purpose

To assess the role of epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)–positive circulating tumor cell (CTC) count in predicting survival outcomes of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Long-Term Outcome of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma 7½ Years After Surgery and Repeated Radiofrequency Ablation: Case Report and Review of the Literature

An interesting case is presented of a 78-year-old patient with cirrhosis who was managed with combined treatment (surgery and radiofrequency (RF) ablation) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and has survived for 7(1/2) years. Elevation of the alpha-FP (alpha-fetoprotein) levels was noted 2 years after surgery. CT demonstrated two lesions: one central at the remaining right liver lobe, and the other at the excision site. Biopsy of the lesions confirmed the diagnosis of HCC for both of them. RF ablation of these two lesions was performed in one session with technical success. Four and a half years after the first RF ablation a new recurrence was demonstrated at the CT follow-up control. RF ablation was again applied successfully. The imaging findings and the therapeutic percutaneous management of this patient along with the natural course of HCC and its recurrence are discussed, and the literature concerning risk factors is reviewed.     

Comparison of Stable and Unstable Ethiodized Oil Emulsions for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Single-Center Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose

To compare the stability of stable and unstable water-in-oil emulsions and the efficacy and safety of these emulsions in a single-center, prospective double-blind trial of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

A National Cancer Database Analysis of Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Early-Stage Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer

Purpose

To compare overall survival (OS) after radiofrequency (RF) ablation and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) at high-volume centers in patients with early-stage non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Cost and Effectiveness of Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Limited Surgical Resection for Stage I Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Elderly Patients: Is Less More?

PurposeTo retrospectively evaluate cost and mortality in 84 patients older than 65 years of age with stage IA or IB non–small-cell lung cancer treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation or limited surgical resection (ie, wedge resection or segmentectomy) from the perspective of the payer, Medicare.Materials and MethodsFrom August 2000 to November 2009, 56 patients were treated with RF ablation and 28 with surgery who met the inclusion criteria. Patient health histories and billing charges from initial treatment to the study endpoint were collected. Charges were converted to 2009 Medicare reimbursement fees and cumulated by month. Time–event data were analyzed by using the Kaplan–Meier method. Survival functions and median survival estimates were reported with standard errors. Patient cohorts’ survival functions were compared based on the Wilcoxon weighted χ² statistic.ResultsGroup demographics were comparable with the exception of age, with patients treated with RF ablation an average of 4 years older (95% confidence interval, 0.85–6.76). The overall mortality rate was lower in patients treated with surgery than in those treated with RF ablation (χ² = 8.0225, P = .0046), with a median cost per month lived for RF ablation recipients of $620.74, versus $1,195.92 for those treated with surgery (P = .0002, Wilcoxon rank-sum test).ConclusionsPatients treated with surgery showed a significant increase in survival; however, those treated with RF ablation were significantly older. For patients who are not surgical candidates, RF ablation provides an alternative treatment option at a significantly lower cost.     

Transarterial Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Which Technique Is More Effective? A Systematic Review of Cohort and Randomized Studies

Background Chemoembolization (TACE) improves survival in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The optimal schedule, or whether embolization (TAE) alone gives the same survival advantage, is not known. Purpose To evaluate whether specific patient characteristics and/or radiological transarterial techniques result in better outcomes. Method A PubMed search was carried out for cohort and randomized trials (n = 175) testing transarterial therapies; meta-analysis was performed where appropriate. Results Anticancer drugs were used as sole agent in 75% of cases (double 15% and triple 6%): doxorubicin (36%), cisplatin (31%), epirubicin (12%), mitoxantrone (8%), mitomycin (8%), and SMANCS (5%). Embolizing agents used were: gelatin sponge particles (71%), polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles (8%), degradable starch microspheres (DSM) (4%), and embospheres (4%). Sessions per patient were 2.5 ± 1.5 (interval: 2 months). Objective response was 40 ± 20%; survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were: 62 ± 20%, 42 ± 17%, 30 ± 15%, and 19 ± 16%, respectively, and survival time was 18 ± 9.5 months. The post-TACE complications were: acute liver failure, 7.5% (range 0–49%); acute renal failure, 1.8% (0–13%); encephalopathy, 1.8% (0–16%); ascites, 8.3% (0–52%); upper gastrointestinal bleeding; 3% (0–22%); and hepatic or splenic abscess, 1.3% (0–2.5%). Treatment-related mortality was 2.4% (0–9.5%), mainly due to acute liver failure. Our meta-analysis of nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) confirmed that TACE improves survival; but a meta-analysis of TACE versus TAE alone (3 RCTs, 412 patients) demonstrated no survival difference. Conclusions No chemotherapeutic agent appears better than any other. There is no evidence for benefit with lipiodol. Gelatin sponge is the most used embolic agent, but PVA particles may be better. TAE appears as effective as TACE. New strategies to reduce the risk of post-TACE complications are required.     

Segmental Yttrium-90 Radioembolization versus Segmental Chemoembolization for Localized Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Single-Center,Retrospective, Propensity Score–Matched Study

Purpose

To compare segmental radioembolization with segmental chemoembolization for localized, unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) not amenable to ablation.

Patient and Facility Demographics Related Outcomes in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Radiofrequency Ablation: A National Cancer Database Analysis

Purpose

To determine facility and patient demographics associated with survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with radiofrequency (RF) ablation.