Prolonged survival with improved tolerability in higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes: azacitidine compared with low dose ara‐C

In the phase III AZA‐001 trial, low‐dose cytarabine (LDara‐C), the most widely used low‐dose chemotherapy in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who are ineligible for intensive treatment, was found to be associated with poorer survival compared with azacitidine. This analysis further compared the efficacy and the toxicity of these two drug regimens. Before randomization, investigators preselected patients to receive a conventional care regimen, one of which was LDara‐C. Of 94 patients preselected to LDara‐C, 45 were randomized to azacitidine and 49 to LDara‐C. Azacitidine patients had significantly more and longer haematologicalal responses and increased red blood cell transfusion independence. Azacitidine prolonged overall survival versus LDara‐C in patients with poor cytogenetic risk, presence of ?7/del(7q), and French‐American‐British subtypes refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB) and RAEB in transformation. When analyzed per patient year of drug exposure, azacitidine treatment was associated with fewer grade 3–4 cytopenias and shorter hospitalisation time than LDara‐C in these higher‐risk MDS patients.     

Comparative clinical effectiveness of azacitidine versus decitabine in older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The hypomethylating agents (HMAs) azacitidine and decitabine are both approved for treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in the USA. In Europe, decitabine is not approved due to lack of survival advantage in randomized trials. The two drugs have not been compared in clinical trials. We identified patients diagnosed with MDS between 2004 and 2011 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)‐Medicare linked database in the USA who received ≥ 10 doses of either HMA. We estimated survival from HMA initiation with Kaplan–Meier methods and used multivariate Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for covariates. Analyses controlled for histological subtype and we conducted a subset analysis limited to patients with refractory anaemia with excess blasts (RAEB). In 2025 HMA‐treated patients, median survival was 15 months with no difference in survival based on the HMA received in adjusted analysis (decitabine versus azacitidine, hazard ratio = 1·06, 95% confidence interval: 0·94–1·19, P = 0·37). For RAEB patients (n = 523), median survival was 12 months, with no significant difference based on HMA received. No significant survival difference was found between azacitidine and decitabine in patients with MDS, including RAEB. Importantly, population‐based survival of azacitidine‐treated RAEB patients was substantially shorter than in the AZA‐001 clinical trial (11 versus 24·5 months).     

Efficacy and safety of a 5‐day regimen of azacitidine for patients with high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes

Although a 7‐day (d) regimen of azacitidine (AZA) is the standard treatment of high‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), AZA is difficult to administer during weekends in an outpatient setting. We retrospectively investigated the outcome of a 5‐d regimen of AZA in patients with high‐risk MDS. High‐risk MDS was defined as MDS with intermediate‐2‐ or high‐risk MDS according to the International Prognostic Scoring System. Every months AZA was given at 75 mg/m² per day for 5–7 d in hospital for first cycle and 5 d in outpatient for second cycle and later. Between April 2011 and December 2013, AZA treatment was initiated in 25 patients (men, 22; women, 3; median age, 75 yr; age range, 59–86 yr). The median number of AZA cycles was 10 (range, 1–24). Twenty patients received more than three cycles of AZA and 13 (52%) achieved any hematological improvement (HI). The median time to first response was two cycles (1–3). The most common non‐hematological adverse events were neutropenia in 21 patients and thrombocytopenia in 17 patients. Nineteen patients died. The main cause of death was disease progression (five patients) and infectious complications (11 patients). The median overall survival was 13.2 months. The 5‐d AZA regimen showed a good continuation rate of more than three cycles and an equivalent HI with the 7‐d regimen.     

Azacitidine improves outcome in higher‐risk MDS patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities: a retrospective comparison of GESMD and GFM registries

Treatment with azacitidine (AZA) has been suggested to be of benefit for higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR‐MDS) patients with chromosome 7 abnormalities (Abn 7). This retrospective study of 235 HR‐MDS patients with Abn 7 treated with AZA (n = 115) versus best supportive care (BSC; n = 120), assessed AZA treatment as a time‐varying variable in multivariable analysis. A Cox Regression model with time‐interaction terms of overall survival (OS) at different time points confirmed that, while chromosome 7 cytogenetic categories (complex karyotype [CK] versus non‐CK) and International Prognostic Scoring System risk (high versus intermediate‐2) retained poor prognosis over time, AZA treatment had a favourable impact on OS during the first 3 years of treatment compared to BSC (Hazard ratio [HR] 0·5 P < 0·001 at 1 year, 0·7 P = 0·019 at 2 years; 0·73 P = 0·029 at 3 years). This benefit was present in all chromosome 7 categories, but tended to be greater in patients with CK (risk reduction of 82%, 68% and 53% at 1, 3 and 6 months in CK patients; 79% at 1 month in non‐CK patients, P < 0·05 for all). AZA also significantly improved progression‐free survival (P < 0·01). This study confirms a time‐dependent benefit of AZA on outcome in patients with HR‐MDS and cytogenetic abnormalities involving chromosome 7, especially for those with CK.     

Azacitidine with or without Entinostat for the treatment of therapy‐related myeloid neoplasm: further results of the E1905 North American Leukemia Intergroup study

Therapy‐related myeloid neoplasms (tMN) are serious late effects of the treatment of cancer with poor response to conventional treatment. Azacitidine (AZA) has been used to treat patients with tMN but current data are retrospective. We present here 47 tMN patients prospectively enrolled as a specific cohort in the E1905 study. The E1905 study was a randomized phase 2 study (NCT00313586) testing 10 d of AZA (50 mg/m²/d) +/? the histone deacetylase inhibitor entinostat (4 mg/m²/d PO day‐3 and day‐10). A total of 47 patients [29 therapy‐related myelosyspastic syndrome (t‐MDS) and 18 therapy‐related acute myeloid leukaemia (t‐AML)] were recruited to the study. 24 patients were treated with AZA monotherapy and 23 with AZA+entinostat. The median number of administered cycles was 4, significantly higher in patients treated with AZA (6 cycles vs. 3 cycles, P = 0·008). Haematological normalization rates were 46% in monotherapy and 17% in the combination arm. Median overall survivals were 13 and 6 months, respectively. The novel 50 * 10 schedule of azacitidine appears effective, with response rates, when given as single agent, comparable to those for patients with de novo MDS/AML treated on the same protocol. However, the combination of AZA and entinostat was associated with increased toxicity and could not be recommended for treatment of tMN.     

Bone marrow hypocellularity does not affect tolerance or efficacy of azacitidine in patients with higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndromes

The efficacy and tolerance of azacitidine in higher‐risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular bone marrow (BM) are unknown. This post hoc AZA‐001 trial analysis assessed whether baseline BM cellularity affected the overall survival (OS) advantage demonstrated with azacitidine versus conventional care regimens (CCR). Baseline BM biopsies of <30% cellularity were considered hypocellular with data evaluable from 299 patients (azacitidine n = 154, CCR n = 145); 13% (n = 39) hypocellular, 87% (n = 260) non‐hypocellular. Patient characteristics were balanced between cellularity and treatment groups. Most patients (90–100%) had 2–3 cytopenias at baseline. Median (range) azacitidine treatment cycle lengths were 35·5 (28–54) and 33·0 (15–75) d in hypocellular and non‐hypocellular groups, respectively. At 33 months, median OS was not reached (NR) [95% confidence interval (CI): 19·2, NR] in hypocellular patients receiving azacitidine versus 16·9 months (95% CI: 11·1, 19·3) with CCR (P = 0·001); and in non‐hypocellular patients, it was 21·1 months (95% CI: 16·2, 34·7) versus 15·3 months (95% CI: 9·3, 17·6) (P = 0·012). Azacitidine tolerance was similar regardless of cellularity. Grade 3–4 thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred similarly in hypocellular patients treated with azacitidine versus CCR (80% vs. 92% and 88% vs. 75%). Azacitidine OS results are consistent with those from AZA‐001, regardless of cellularity, and demonstrate its safety and efficacy in higher‐risk myelodysplasia with hypocellular BM.     

Phase I/II trial of the combination of midostaurin (PKC412) and 5‐azacytidine for patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome

We investigated the combination of midostaurin and azacitidine (AZA) in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Patients received AZA 75 mg m^?2 on days 1–7 and midostaurin 25 mg bid (in cohort 1 of phase I) or 50 mg bid (in cohort 2 of Phase I and in Phase II) orally on day 8–21 during the first cycle and continuously thereafter. Fourteen patients were enrolled in the phase I and 40 in the phase II. Overall response rate was 26%. The median remission duration (RD) was 20 weeks and was significantly longer in patients with FLT3 mutations not previously exposed to other FLT3 inhibitors (P = 0.05) and in patients not previously transplanted (P = 0.01). Thirty‐two (59%) patients have died, all of complications related to disease progression. G3‐4 nonhematological toxicity was reported in 38 (70%) patients, most frequently infections (56%), ejection fraction reduction (11%), and diarrhea or nausea/vomiting (9% each). The combination of midostaurin and AZA is an effective and safe regimen in patients with AML and high‐risk MDS. Patients with FLT3 mutations but not previously exposed to other FLT3 inhibitors and patients not previously transplanted derived the greatest benefit. Further studies with this combination are warranted. Am. J. Hematol. 90:276–281, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Azacitidine in the ‘real‐world’: an evaluation of 1101 higher‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome/low blast count acute myeloid leukaemia patients in Ontario,Canada

The outcome of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients with uniformly higher‐risk disease treated with azacitidine (AZA) in the ‘real‐world’ remains largely unknown. We evaluated 1101 consecutive higher‐risk MDS patients (International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate‐2/high) and low‐blast count acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; 21–30% blasts) patients treated in Ontario, Canada. By dosing schedule, 24·7% received AZA for seven consecutive days, 12·4% for six consecutive days and 62·9% by 5‐2‐2. Overall, median number of cycles was 6 (range 1–67) and 8 (range 6–14) when restricted to the 692 (63%) patients who received at least 4 cycles. The actuarial median survival was 11·6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10·7–12·4) for the entire cohort and 18·0 months (landmark analysis; 95% CI 16·6–19·1 months) for those receiving at least 4 cycles. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between the 3 dosing schedules (P = 0·87). In our large ‘real‐world’ evaluation of AZA in higher‐risk MDS/low‐blast count AML, we demonstrated a lower than expected OS. Reassuringly, survival did not differ by dosing schedules. The OS was higher in the 2/3 of patients who received at least 4 cycles of treatment, reinforcing the necessity of sustained administration until therapeutic benefits are realised. This represents the largest ‘real‐world’ evaluation of AZA in higher‐risk MDS/low‐blast count AML.     

Detection of risk groups in myelodysplastic syndromes. A multicenter study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) comprise a group of heterogeneous hematologic disorders with risk of leukemic evolution (LE). The French-American-British (FAB) co-operative group classifies them into five morphologic entities and the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) proposes four groups of risk on the basis of clinical and cytogenetic variables. The aim of this study was to evaluate the application of the IPSS in our Argentine population, to test the prognostic value of its variables and to determine whether this score helps to associate prognostic subgroups of risk into FAB subtypes. DESIGN AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty-four patients with primary MDS and a median follow-up of 28 months were evaluated using univariate analyses to determine median survival (SV) and the time to LE. The variables analyzed were FAB classification, IPSS, percentage of myeloblasts, cytogenetic groups of risk and number of cytopenias. RESULTS: Univariate analyses showed that all variables analyzed were predictive for SV and for LE in our MDS population. Application of the IPSS allowed discrimination into the 4 groups of risk and helped to identify prognostic subclasses among the FAB classification, associating 5%, 15% and 19% of cases with worse prognosis within the FAB classification of refractory anemia (RA), RA with ringed sideroblasts and RA with excess of blasts (RAEB), respectively. The IPSS was not informative for RAEB in transformation cases and would not be applied to patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: This score could be applied to our MDS population, showing no geographic differences. Stratification of FAB patients according to IPSS would be helpful to develop risk-adapted therapeutic strategies.     

Azacitidine and low‐dose cytarabine in palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia and high bone marrow blast counts – a retrospective single‐center experience

We retrospectively analyzed and compared the efficacy and toxicity of azacitidine (AZA) and low‐dose cytarabine (LD‐Ara‐C) in 65 palliative patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) showing high bone marrow blast counts (≥30%) before start of treatment. Twenty‐seven and 38 patients received AZA and LD‐Ara‐C, respectively. The median patient age was 71 yr. Patient and disease characteristics did not differ between the treatment groups, except for BM blast counts, and peripheral leukocyte and blast counts which were significantly higher in the LD‐Ara‐C group. AZA and LD‐Ara‐C were first‐line treatment in 12 (44%) and 17 patients (45%), respectively. Response and hematologic improvement rates were low and similar in both treatment groups. In both treatment groups, most common non‐hematologic toxicities included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and bleedings without significant differences regarding frequencies. Estimated 1‐yr survival rates were 15% (95% CI 8–22) and 13% (95% CI 7–19) in the AZA and LD‐Ara‐C groups, respectively, without statistically significant difference. In multivariate analysis (n = 65), previous treatment (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.00–5.22, P = 0.05) and adverse cytogenetics (HR 2.50, 95% CI 1.20–5.22, P = 0.02) were independent predictors of poor survival. In our center and within the limitations of a retrospective study, both treatment regimens showed similar but limited efficacy in palliative patients with AML and high BM blast counts.     

The prognostic value of monosomal karyotype (MK) in higher‐risk patients with myelodysplastic syndromes treated with 5‐Azacitidine: A retrospective analysis of the Hellenic (Greek) Myelodysplastic syndromes Study Group

In this study, we investigated the incidence and prognostic impact of monosomal karyotype (MK) in 405 higher‐risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) patients treated with 5‐AZA. The MK was present in 66 out of 405 (16.3%) patients, most of whom had complex karyotype (CK). MK was strongly associated with CK and the cytogenetic risk defined according to IPSS‐R, as well as with high‐risk disease, according to IPSS (P = .029), IPSS‐R (P < .001), and WPSS (P < .001) classification systems. The overall response rate (ORR) was not different between MK+ and MK– patients (46.6% vs. 46.2%). At 28 months median follow‐up, the median duration of response was 11 months in the entire cohort, 9.5 months in MK+ patients and 11 months in MK‐patients (P = .024). The estimated median time to transformation to acute myeloid leukemia for MK+ patients was 17 months vs. 23 months for MK– patients (P = .025). The estimated median OS for MK+ patients was 12 months vs. 18 months for MK– patients (P < .001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that performance status (P < .001), IPSS‐R (P < .001), and MK (P = .002) were independently associated with overall survival (OS). In a subgroup consisting of high and very‐high risk patients according to IPSS‐R, MK– patients showed better OS rates compared to MK+ patients (estimated median OS: 17 months vs. 12 months, P = .002). In conclusion, we found that MK is associated with reduced OS in patients with higher‐risk MDS treated with 5‐AZA. Furthermore, we showed that in MDS with high or very‐high IPSS‐R risk score, MK can further distinguish patients with worse outcome.     

Therapy with low‐dose azacitidine for MDS in children and young adults: a retrospective analysis of the EWOG‐MDS study group

Low‐dose azacitidine is efficient and safe in the therapy of malignant myeloid disorders in adults but data in children are lacking. We present a retrospective analysis of 24 children and young adults with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who received azacitidine at the time of first diagnosis or relapse after allotransplant (2 children were treated with azacitidine both initially and for relapse). Diagnoses were refractory cytopenia of childhood (N = 4), advanced primary MDS (N = 9) and secondary MDS (N = 11). The median duration of treatment was four cycles. Azacitidine was well tolerated, but cytopenias led to dose reduction in five cases. Treatment was discontinued in one child because of impaired renal function. Sixteen MDS patients were treated with azacitidine at first diagnosis. One complete clinical remission was observed and one child showed complete marrow remission; six children experienced stable disease with haematological improvement. Ten children received azacitidine for relapsed MDS after transplant: of these, seven experienced stable disease for 2–30 cycles (median 3), including one patient with haematological improvement for seven cycles. In summary, azacitidine is effective in some children with MDS and appears to be a non‐toxic option in palliative situations to prolong survival.     

Predicting infections in high‐risk patients with myelodysplastic syndrome/acute myeloid leukemia treated with azacitidine: Aretrospective multicenter study

Hypomethylating agents have become the standard therapy for patients with high‐risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). In Israel, azacitidine (AZA) is routinely used. Yet, infectious complications are common during AZA therapy. The current study was aimed to evaluate the incidence and predisposing risk factors for infections in AZA‐treated patients. This retrospective study included patients treated with AZA in 18 Israeli medical institutions between 2008 and 2011. Data on 184 patients [157 high‐risk MDS and 27 acute myeloid leukemia (AML)], with a median age of 71.6 (range 29–92) were recorded. Overall, 153 infectious events were reported during 928 treatment cycles (16.5%) administered to 100 patients. One hundred fourteen, 114/153 (75%) events required hospitalization and 30 (19.6%) were fatal. In a univariate analysis, unfavorable cytogenetics, low neutrophil, hemoglobin (Hb) and platelet (PLT) counts were found to be associated with infections (24.4% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.0001; 27% vs. 13.5%, P < 0.0001; 20.4% vs. 11%, P < 0.0001 and 29.2% vs. 14.2%, P < 0.0001, respectively). In multivariate analysis, only low Hb level, low PLT count, and unfavorable cytogenetics remained significant. Prior to therapy, poor cytogenetics, PLT count below 20 × 10⁹/L and neutrophil count below 0.5 × 10⁹/L were predictive of the risk of infection during the first two cycles of therapy. In conclusion, patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, presenting with low neutrophil and PLT counts, are susceptible to infections. Evaluation of infection risk should be repeated prior to each cycle. Patients with poor cytogenetics in whom AZA is prescribed despite low PLT count are particularly at high risk for infections and infection prophylaxis may be considered. Am. J. Hematol. 88:130–134, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A phase 2, randomized,double‐blind,multicenter study comparing siltuximab plus best supportive care (BSC) with placebo plus BSC in anemic patients with International Prognostic Scoring System low‐ or intermediate‐1–risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) may play an important role in the pathophysiology of anemia of inflammation associated with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). This double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 study assessed the efficacy and safety of siltuximab, a chimeric anti–IL‐6 monoclonal antibody, in patients with low‐ and intermediate‐1–risk MDS who require transfusions for MDS anemia. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to siltuximab 15 mg kg^?1 every 4 weeks + best supportive care (BSC) or placebo + BSC for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was reduction in red blood cell (RBC) transfusions to treat MDS anemia, defined as ≥50% relative decrease and ≥2‐unit absolute decrease in RBC transfusions. Fifty and 26 patients were randomized to the siltuximab and placebo groups, respectively. The study did not meet its prespecified hypothesis, with six (12%) patients in the siltuximab group and one (3.8%) in the placebo group having reductions in RBC transfusions (P = 0.271). At the time of the planned futility analysis, the prespecified cutoff criteria were not met, and the study was terminated early due to lack of efficacy. No unexpected safety findings were observed. In conclusion, compared to placebo, treatment with siltuximab did not reduce RBC transfusions in transfusion‐dependent patients with low‐ and intermediate‐1–risk MDS. Future studies might explore siltuximab in patients with less iron overload and with elevated IL‐6 levels and/or using higher doses for MDS. Am. J. Hematol. 89:E156–E162, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

低增生骨髓增生异常综合征的由来和转归

目的探讨低增生骨髓增生异常综合征（ＭＤＳ）的由来和发展。方法对我院１０年中确诊的２５例低增生ＭＤＳ进行了系统分析,对其中１７例患者进行长期追访。结果（１）低增生ＭＤＳ占同期确诊为ＭＤＳ的２１９例患者中１１．４％,确诊时平均年龄为（４４．８±１４．７）岁。（２）ＦＡＢ分型：难治性贫血（ＲＡ）１１例,难治性贫血伴原始细胞增多（ＲＡＥＢ）１４例。（３）低增生ＭＤＳ很可能是ＭＤＳ患者病程中一个阶段,其骨髓增生活跃和低下可以相互转化,这种转化不但可以发生在同一ＦＡＢ亚型内,也可以发生在不同亚型相互转化时。（４）长期随访的１７例患者中有７例转为急性白血病,占４１．２％,６例为急性粒细胞白血病,１例为急性淋巴细胞白血病;７例中３例转为低增生白血病,４例为增生活跃或极度活跃白血病。（５）１７例患者中７例自低增生ＲＡＥＢ转为急性白血病时间为１～７４个月,中数为２７个月。（６）低增生ＭＤＳ的产生与治疗药物无明显相关。结论低增生ＭＤＳ很可能为ＭＤＳ病程中一个阶段而非一种特殊类型。     

A phase II study of 5‐day intravenous azacitidine in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes

The approved 7‐day schedule of subcutaneous azacitidine for myelodysplastic syndrome is associated with injection site reactions and bruising and may be inconvenient because of the need for weekend doses. Although pharmacokinetic data with IV azacitidine suggests equivalence, there are no efficacy data published. Patients with all myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) FAB subtypes were enrolled and received 75 mg/m²/d of azacitidine by 20‐min intravenous infusion for 5 days in every 28 days. Global methylation studies were performed at baseline and prior to Cycle 3. Twenty‐five patients were enrolled and 22 were evaluable. Median age was 69.5 years; 9 (41%) patients had lower‐risk disease (IPSS Low or Int‐1) and 13 (59%) had higher‐risk disease (IPSS Int‐2 or High). Twenty‐seven percent of patients responded (5 CRs and 1 PR). The median time to response was 108 days. The median PFS was 339 days (11.3 months), the median OS was 444 days (14.8 months) and the median duration of response (DOR) was 450 days (15.0 months). Global methylation studies suggest a greater degree of demethylation in responders. This regimen appeared to offer a PR + CR rate and median DOR somewhat similar to what has been reported with the 7‐day subcutaneous regimen; however, OS was shorter. Am. J. Hematol. 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Azacitidine in untreated acute myeloid leukemia: A report on 149 patients

Limited data are available on azacitidine (AZA) treatment and its prognostic factors in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). One hundred and forty‐nine previously untreated AML patients considered ineligible for intensive chemotherapy received AZA in a compassionate patient‐named program. AML diagnosis was de novo, post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), post‐MPN, and therapy‐related AML in 51, 55, 13, and 30 patients, respectively. Median age was 74 years, median white blood cell count (WBC) was 3.2 × 10⁹/L and 58% of the patients had ≥30% marrow blasts. Cytogenetics was adverse in 60 patients. Patients received AZA for a median of five cycles (range 1–31). Response rate (including complete remission/CR with incomplete recovery/partial remission) was 27.5% after a median of three cycles (initial response), and 33% at any time (best response). Only adverse cytogenetics predicted poorer response. Median overall survival (OS) was 9.4 months. Two‐year OS was 51% in responders and 10% in non‐responders (P<0.0001). Adverse cytogenetics, WBC >15 × 10⁹/L and ECOG‐PS ≥2 predicted poorer OS, while age and marrow blast percentage had no impact. Using MDS IWG 2006 response criteria, among patients with stable disease, those with hematological improvement had no significant survival benefit in a 7 months landmark analysis. Outcomes observed in this high‐risk AML population treated with AZA deserve comparison with those of patients treated intensively in prospective studies. Am. J. Hematol. 89:410–416, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Hematological features of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes associated with a chromosome 5q deletion

The hematological and clinical features of 26 patients with myelodysplasia and a chromosome 5q deletion in the bone marrow are presented. We have examined the relationship of French-American-British Co-operative Group (FAB) 1982 classification and bone marrow karyotype at diagnosis with patient outcome and the presence or absence of the classical features of the 5q- syndrome. Those patients classified as refractory anemia (RA) with no additional karyotypic abnormalities have the typical features of the 5q- syndrome and a good prognosis. None of the patients in this group transformed to acute leukemia during the period of follow-up. Patients with either refractory anemia and excess blasts (RAEB) or additional karyotypic abnormalities show many of the hematologic features of the 5q- syndrome but do not share the good prognosis. We conclude that the 5q- syndrome may be best defined as primary MDS of the FAB type RA with a 5q deletion as the sole karyotypic abnormality. This simple definition will distinguish patients with a good prognosis and all the classical features of the 5q- syndrome.     

Codon 12 ras mutations in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome: incidence and prognostic value

 To determine the prevalence of activated ras-oncogenes (N-ras, Harvey-ras Kirsten-ras), DNA derived from peripheral blood of 51 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was investigated. The method was based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to amplify DNA, followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis. Among the French-American-British (FAB) subtypes, N-ras mutations were found in two patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts (RAEB), in one patient with refractory anemia with excess of blasts in transformation (RAEB-t), and in two patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). MDS patients with a mutation at codon 12 of the N-ras gene showed shorter survival duration than other MDS patients of the same FAB subtypes, although these findings proved to be not statistically significant (P>0.1). Interestingly, all but one patient with N-ras mutation developed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). In conclusion, the presence of mutation at codon 12 of the N-ras gene might serve as a negative prognostic factor at diagnosis of MDS. Received: 9 May 1996 / Accepted: 10 October 1996     

Deferasirox treatment of iron-overloaded chelation-naïve and prechelated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes in medical practice: results from the observational studies eXtend and eXjange

EXtend and eXjange were prospective, 1‐yr, non‐interventional, observational, multicentre studies that investigated deferasirox, a once‐daily oral iron chelator, in iron‐overloaded chelation‐naïve and prechelated patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), respectively, treated in the daily‐routine setting of office‐based physicians. No inclusion or exclusion criteria or additional monitoring procedures were applied. Deferasirox was administered as recommended in the European Summary of Product Characteristics. Haematological parameters and adverse events (AEs) were collected at two‐monthly intervals. Data from 123 chelation‐naïve patients with MDS (mean age 70.4 yrs) with median baseline serum ferritin level of 2679 (range 184–16 500) ng/mL, and 44 prechelated patients with MDS (mean age 69.6 yrs) with median baseline serum ferritin level of 2442 (range 521–8565) ng/mL, were assessed. The mean prescribed daily dose of deferasirox at the first visit was 15.7 and 18.7 mg/kg/d, respectively. Treatment with deferasirox produced a significant reduction in median serum ferritin levels in chelation‐naïve patients with MDS from 2679 to 2000 ng/mL (P = 0.0002) and a pronounced decrease in prechelated patients with MDS from 2442 to 2077 ng/mL (P = 0.06). The most common drug‐related AEs were gastrointestinal, increased serum creatinine levels and rash. These studies demonstrate that deferasirox used in physicians’ medical practices is effective in managing iron burden in transfusion‐dependent patients with MDS.