Outcome of children with B cell lymphoma in Venezuela with the LMB-89 protocol

BACKGROUND: We analyzed the results of the LMB-89 protocol performed in seven centers in Venezuela in 96 children having B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma treated from 1995 to 2002. PROCEDURE: Mean age was 7.1 years with 71 (74%) been male. Eighty-two patients (85%) had diffuse small cell lymphoma Burkitt and Burkitt-like, and 14 (15%) had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Initial disease sites included the abdomen in 67%, peripheral nodes in 8%, and mediastinal in 4%. Treatment was directed to risk groups as described for LMB-89 protocol. Group A: seven patients (7%), group B: 80 patients (83%), and group C: nine patients (9%). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 35 +/- 31 months. Complete remission (CR) occurred in 70 patients (73%); four patients (6%) had relapse during the first year and ten patients (10%) had progressive disease. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were 85 and 80% at 1 year, and 82 and 75% at 2 years, respectively. The EFS by therapeutic groups at 3 years was A: 100%; B: 76%, and C: 56%. Toxicity: neutropenia in 75%, thrombocytopenia in 63%, febrile neutropenia in 39%. Viral infections: hepatitis B in 20%, hepatitis C in 2%, and Herpes zoster in 3%. Tumor lysis syndrome (TLS) occurred in 9% during induction phase with a high mortality of 44% (urate-oxidase was available only at the end of the study). CONCLUSIONS: The high mortality rate during induction phase prohibited a better EFS. Prophylactic use of xantine-oxidase may improve future results. The high incidence of hepatitis B requires a vaccination program.     

Rare non‐Hodgkin lymphoma of childhood and adolescence: A consensus diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pediatric‐type follicular lymphoma,marginal zone lymphoma,and nonanaplastic peripheral T‐cell lymphoma

Pediatric‐type follicular (PTFL), marginal zone (MZL), and peripheral T‐cell lymphoma (PTCL) account each for <2% of childhood non‐Hodgkin lymphoma. We present clinical and histopathological features of PTFL, MZL, and few subtypes of PTCL and provide treatment recommendations. For localized PTFL and MZL, watchful waiting after complete resection is the therapy of choice. For PTCL, therapy is subtype‐dependent and ranges from a block‐like anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL)‐derived and, alternatively, leukemia‐derived therapy in PTCL not otherwise specified and subcutaneous panniculitis‐like T‐cell lymphoma to a block‐like mature B‐NHL‐derived or, preferentially, ALCL‐derived treatment followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in first remission in hepatosplenic and angioimmunoblastic T‐cell lymphoma.     

Successful allogeneic hemopoietic stem cell transplantation in a case of Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome and non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

WAS is a severe X‐linked recessive disorder characterized by microthrombocytopenia, eczema, and immunodeficiency. A six‐yr‐old boy with WAS diagnosed as B‐cell NHL (Stage III) localized in the liver who underwent successful HSCT from HLA‐one antigen mismatch sibling donor has been presented here. His conditioning regimen included ATG, busulfan, and fludarabine. He received 2.3 × 10⁶/kg CD 34(+) stem cells and 11 × 10⁸/kg nucleated cells at day 0. Neutrophil engraftment was achieved at day +14 and platelet engraftment at day +20. He has been in CR for more than two yr after transplantation. Thus, HSCT is an effective treatment for children with WAS even after development of lymphoma.