Breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: predictive markers and relation with outcome

The aim of this study was to provide a better insight into breast cancer response to chemotherapy. Chemotherapy improves outcome in breast cancer patients. The effect of cytotoxic treatment cannot be predicted for individual patients. Therefore, the identification of tumour characteristics associated with tumour response and outcome is of great clinical interest. We studied 97 patients, who received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumour samples were taken prior to and after chemotherapy. We quantified the response to chemotherapy clinically and pathologically and determined histological and molecular tumour characteristics. We assessed changes in the expression of Bcl-2, ER, P53 HER2 and Ki-67. Association with response and outcome was tested for all parameters. The experimental results showed 15 clinical (17%) and three (3%) pathological complete remissions. There were 18 (20%) clinical vs 29 (33%) pathological nonresponders. The expression of most markers was similar before and after chemotherapy. Only Ki-67 was significantly decreased after chemotherapy. Factors correlated with response were: large tumour size, ER negativity, high Ki-67 count and positive P53 status. Tumour response and marker expression did not predict disease-free or overall survival. In conclusion, clinical and pathological response assessments are poorly associated. Proliferation decreases significantly after chemotherapy. ER negativity and a high proliferation index are associated with better response. HER2 status does not predict response, and outcome is not related to tumour response.     

Proliferation markers predictive of the pathological response and disease outcome of patients with breast carcinomas treated by anthracycline-based preoperative chemotherapy

The cell proliferation rate has been correlated to the response of breast carcinomas to preoperative chemotherapy (CT) and to disease outcome. However, this parameter is not yet used to select which tumours should be treated with preoperative CT. Furthermore, there is no consensus in the method used to evaluate cell proliferation. In poor prognosis breast carcinomas (PPBCs) treated by intensive preoperative CT, we compared the predictive value of S phase fraction (SPF), mitotic index (MI) and Ki67. We also evaluated the prognostic significance of the variation of the MI after CT. A series of 55 T2-T4N0N1M0 breast carcinomas were treated with 4 cycles of cyclophosphamide, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and doxorubicin. SPF was determined by flow cytometry on pre-therapeutic needle aspiration products. MI and Ki67 were evaluated on pre-therapeutic biopsy samples and on the tumours after CT. Fifteen patients (27%) had a pathological complete response (pCR), whereas 40 (73%) had residual disease. All three proliferative markers were found to have predictive value, but this value was higher for MI than for SPF (P = 0.04) and Ki67 (P = 0.03): the rate of pCR was 50% in cases with MI > 17/3.3 mm2, but was only 7% in cases with MI under this threshold (P = 0.0003). A significant decrease of MI (mean 10.97) was observed after CT (P = 0.001). Furthermore, we observed that even for patients with residual tumour, the variation of MI after CT was a prognostic parameter and overall survival. The sequential analysis of MI in breast cancers treated by preoperative CT thus provides a surrogate for predicting long-term outcome.     

Nucleostemin and TWIST as predictive markers for recurrence after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal carcinoma

We recently demonstrated that overexpression of the nucleolar GTP-binding protein nucleostemin drives the fraction of genetically-defined tumor cells that exhibit markers and tumorigenic properties of tumor initiating cells. More specifically, cells that constitutively express elevated levels of nucleostemin exhibit increased TWIST expression; expression of genes that induced pluripotent stem cells; enhanced radioresistance; tumor formation, even when small numbers of cells are implanted; and an increased propensity to metastasize. An immunohistochemical analysis of cancer stem cell markers, such as nucleostemin and TWIST has not been conducted in surgically-resected esophageal squamous cell carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In the present study, we examined the expression of CD133, CD44, nucleostemin, guanine nucleotide-binding protein-like 3-like, and TWIST by immunohistochemistry in a series of 54 surgically-resected specimens of esophageal squamous cell carcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We identified that high nucleostemin proportion, TWIST intensity, and advanced pathological N stage were significantly correlated with poor relapse-free survival. Together, these observations imply nucleostemin and TWIST as the predictive markers for postoperative recurrence.     

Validation of an immunohistochemical signature predictive of 8-year outcome for patients with breast carcinoma

We recently reported that standardized quantitative immunohistochemical (IHC) assays allowed prediction of an adverse outcome among 572 node negative (N-) patients with breast carcinoma (BrCa). To further validate our prior findings, we repeated the IHC stains including a second series of BrCa diagnosed at Yale University. Tissue microarrays (TMAs) of two cohorts of patients with BrCa (418 Marseille University and 303 Yale University) were respectively investigated for IHC expression of 15 markers (HIF-1α, PI3K, pAKT, pmTOR, moesin, P21, 4(E) BP-1, P27, Ker5-6, pMAPKAPK-2, SHARP2, claudin-1, ALDH, AF6 and CD24). Quantitative measurements of immunoprecipitates densitometry assessed with an image analyzer were correlated with 8-year patients' outcome and compared in the two cohorts. The best predictive signature consisted of a combination of five markers that included HIF-1α, PI3K, claudin-1, AF6 and pAKT in N- BrCa. This combination permitted an accurate prediction of outcome in 92.34% (386/418) of N- patients in the first set (Marseille) and 89.8% (158/176) in the second set (Yale). The close results in both cohorts confirmed the validity of this original IHC signature predictive of prognosis in node negative BrCa. This validation suggests that in clinical practice, it would be possible with standardized kits (i) to identify patients with poor prognosis at diagnosis time, particularly in the N- BrCa subset, who would require more aggressive adjuvant therapy and (ii) to avoid useless expensive therapies and their side effects in N- patients with favorable prognosis.     

Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on outcome in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with first-line doxorubicin-containing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study was to analyze the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in comparison with other prognostic parameters on the outcome of a series of patients with breast carcinoma at time of metastatic recurrence. METHODS: Data from 1430 patients accrued in 8 prospective trials of anthracycline-based first-line chemotherapy conducted at the Institut Curie between 1977 and 1992 were reviewed. RESULTS: Patients who had not received adjuvant chemotherapy had better response rates (66%) than pretreated patients (56%; P < 0.0001). Median overall survival rates after metastatic recurrence were 26 months compared with 19 months, respectively (P < 0.0001). Local and regional recurrences as well as the number of organ sites involved with metastatic disease were reduced in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy. In a multivariate analysis, the following parameters if present at the initiation of treatment were associated with poor outcome: elevated lactico dehydrogenase (LDH), low Karnofsky index, short disease free interval, more than two involved sites, liver involvement, and prior adjuvant chemotherapy. This adverse prognostic effect of prior adjuvant chemotherapy was independent of the type of drugs and of the duration of the treatment and was present even in the subgroup patients with prolonged disease free intervals longer than 48 months. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy adversely affects overall response rates and overall survival rates in patients with metastatic breast carcinoma treated with first-line anthracycline based chemotherapy.     

Induction of senescence markers after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma and association with clinical outcome: an exploratory analysis

The aim of this study was to assess the induction of senescence markers versus apoptosis pathways in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) tumour samples before and after neo-adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy and to investigate their relationship with clinical outcome.Specific senescence pathways were assessed by quantifying the expression of p21 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) for the p21-p53 pathway, IGFBP7 for the IGF pathway and ALDH1A3 for the IFN pathway. p21 and PAI-1 expression were also assessed by immunohistochemistry. In addition, beta-galactosidase activity staining at pH 6.0 was performed. Apoptosis was determined by TUNEL assay. Clinical outcome was assessed by modified RECIST criteria, progression-free and overall survival.In a training set (n = 9 patients) paired comparison demonstrated a significant increase in p21 (p < 0.05), PAI-1 (p < 0.01) and apoptosis (p < 0.01) after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The patients with the highest increase in PAI-1 had stable disease, whilst patients with little change in senescence markers accompanied by a high increase in apoptosis had an objective response after chemotherapy. The hypothesis that stable disease might be associated with an increase in senescence markers was confirmed in a tissue microarray (n = 26 patients) using p21 and PAI-1 immunohistochemistry as readouts. For patients where survival and time to progression data were available, increased PAI-1 levels were significantly associated with a worst outcome.Our results demonstrate induction of senescence markers by neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in a proportion of patients with MPM and its potential association with a poor outcome.     

Induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin for locally advanced cervical carcinoma

Induction chemotherapy followed by surgery, particularly with newer agents or combinations, remains to be explored in locally advanced cervical cancer. Gemcitabine cisplatin is a very active combination for this tumor, therefore we explored the activity of gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin. Ten untreated patients with histologic diagnosis of cervical carcinoma and staged as IB2 to IIIB were treated with 3 21-day courses of oxaliplatin 130 mg/m day 1 and gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m days 1 and 8 followed by locoregional treatment with either surgery or concomitant chemoradiation. Response and toxicity were evaluated at the end of chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable. The overall clinical response rate was 80%, being complete in 3 patients (30%) and partial in 5 (50%). Seven (70%) patients underwent surgery, and three (30%) had chemoradiation as definitive treatment. Hematologic toxicity was moderate, with leukopenia grades III-IV in 17 and 0%; granulocytopenia grades III-IV in 23 and 3%, respectively. Eight patients had grade I oropharyngeal toxicity. At a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 10-12), all patients are disease free. Gemcitabine oxaliplatin is a very active and well-tolerated combination for locally advanced cervical cancer.     

Adenoid cystic carcinoma of the breast: molecular markers,treatment, and clinical outcome

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to comprehensively characterize the clinical and biologic features of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) and to assess the implications for management in a large cohort of patients. METHODS: From a database of 50,000 patients, 28 were identified with ACC for which clinical follow-up and biologic information was available. The biologic features examined included estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status, DNA ploidy, and S-phase fraction. Median follow-up was 83 months with a range of 29 to 144 months. Overall survival and disease free survival curves were drawn using Kaplan and Meier estimates and were compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: All but one patient were postmenopausal with a median age at diagnosis of 66 years (range, 40-96 years). One patient had macroscopic metastatic disease at diagnosis. Median tumor size was 1.9 cm (range, 0.5-7.0 cm). Axillary lymph node dissection was performed in 23 patients. Only 1 patient (4%) had histologic positive lymph nodes (2 of 10), and no recurrence was detected for this patient. Forty-six percent were ER positive (median, 16 fmol/mg protein; range, 5-1017 fmol/mg), and 35% were PgR positive (median, 61 fmol/mg protein; range, 6-854 fmol/mg). S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy were assessable in 24 cases. Ninety percent of tumors had low S-phase (median, 3.3%; range, 0.1-34.2%), and 92% were diploid. Simple or modified radical mastectomy was performed in 22 patients, and 6 patients were treated by lumpectomy. Five of these six patients also received radiation therapy after lumpectomy. Despite the different surgical approaches, there were no local recurrences. The 5-year disease free survival rate was 100%, and the 5-year overall survival rate was 85% (95% confidence interval, 71.7-98.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Adenoid cystic carcinomas of the breast have very favorable biologic characteristics and, consistent with this, an excellent prognosis. Good local control can be achieved by lumpectomy with radiation or by simple mastectomy. Axillary lymph node dissection is not helpful in clinical management.     

Evaluation of Mucin-1 protein and mRNA expression as prognostic and predictive markers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

BackgroundMucin-1 (MUC1) is a promising antigen for the development of tumor vaccines. We evaluated the frequency of MUC1 expression and its impact on therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer.Patients and methodsPre-treatment core biopsies of patients from the GeparTrio neoadjuvant trial (NCT 00544765) were evaluated for MUC1 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; N = 691) and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR; N = 286) from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples.ResultsMUC1 protein and mRNA was detectable in the majority of cases and was associated with hormone-receptor-positive status (P < 0.001). High MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were associated with lower probability of pathologic complete response (P = 0.017 and P < 0.001) and with longer patient survival (P = 0.03 and P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were independently predictive (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001). MUC1 protein and mRNA expression were independently prognostic for overall survival (P = 0.029 and P = 0.015).ConclusionsMUC1 is frequently expressed in breast cancer and detectable on mRNA and protein level from FFPE tissue. It provides independent predictive information for therapy response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In clinical immunotherapy trials, MUC1 expression may serve as a predictive marker.     

Epigenetics and miRNA as predictive markers and targets for lung cancer chemotherapy

Lung cancer cells show inherent and acquired resistance to chemotherapy. The lack of good predictive markers/novel targets and the incomplete understanding of the mechanisms of resistance limit the success of lung cancer response to chemotherapy. In the present study, we used an isogenic pair of lung adenocarcinoma cell lines; A549 (wild-type) and A549DOX11 (doxorubicin resistant) to study the role of epigenetics and miRNA in resistance/response of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells to doxorubicin. Our results demonstrate differential expression of epigenetic markers whereby the level of HDACs 1, 2, 3 and4, DNA methyltransferase, acetylated H2B and acetylated H3 were lower in A549DOX11 compared to A549 cells. Fourteen miRNAs were dys-regulated in A549DOX11 cells compared to A549 cells, of these 14 miRNAs, 4 (has-mir-1973, 494, 4286 and 29b-3p) have shown 2.99 – 4.44 fold increase in their expression. This was associated with reduced apoptosis and higher resistance of A549DOX11cells to doxorubicin and etoposide. Sequential treatment with the epigenetic modifiers trichostatin A or 5-aza-2''-deoxycytidine followed by doxorubicin resulted in: (i) enhanced sensitivity of both cell lines to doxorubicin especially at low concentrations, (ii) enhanced doxorubicin-induced DNA damage in both cell lines, (iii) dysregulation of some miRNAs in A549 cells. In conclusion, A549DOX11 cells resistant to DNA damaging drugs have epigenetic profile and miRNA expression different from the sensitive cells. Moreover, epigenetic modifiers may reverse the resistance of certain NSCLC cells to DNA damaging agents by enhancing induction of DNA damage. This may open the door for using epigenetic profile/miRNA expression of some cancer cells as resistance markers/targets to improve response of resistant cells to doxorubicin and for the use of combination doxorubicin/epigenetic modifiers to reduce doxorubicin toxicity.     

Dose intensity and outcome with combination chemotherapy for germ cell carcinoma

Two hundred and fifty-three patients with advanced stage germ cell carcinoma received induction chemotherapy with vinblastine, bleomycin and cisplatin, sometimes with subsequent surgical resection of residual masses. Overall, 191 patients (76%) achieved complete remission or no evidence of disease after surgery (CR + NED). With 64 months median follow-up only 24 patients have relapsed (13%) and 68% of all patients treated are long-term survivors and 84% of patients entering CR + NED are alive. Toxicity with this chemotherapy was considerable, including seven deaths from leukopenia and septicaemia and eight deaths from bleomycin lung toxicity. Dose reductions or omissions of the drug from the treatment programme was necessary with cisplatin in 8% of patients, with vinblastine in 37% and with bleomycin in 35% of patients. Analysis of these alterations in dose intensity for each drug revealed that initial treatment response and subsequent survival were not compromised by reductions in intended doses of drug administered for either vinblastine or bleomycin. Too few patients had dose reductions of cisplatin for meaningful analysis. This apparent lack of major dose-response effect for either vinblastine or bleomycin in the present treatment programme for germ cell carcinoma has prompted the initiation of a randomized study to determine whether deletion of bleomycin from treatment for patients with good prognostic pretreatment characteristics improves the therapeutic index of this very successful therapy.     

A literature review of molecular markers predictive of clinical response to cytotoxic chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Background  We aimed to identify, through a review of the literature, candidate genes for a prospective predictive chemosensitivity test in patients with breast cancer. Methods  Papers demonstrating an association between gene alterations in tumor tissue and clinical chemosensitivity in breast cancer patients were selected by Medline searches. We calculated odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of response rates for patients who had tumors with or without gene alteration. Combined ORs and CIs were estimated using the DerSimonian-Laird method. Results  A total of 18 genes were evaluated for association with clinical chemosensitivity in 6378 patients registered in 69 studies. The median (range) number of patients in each study was 73 (29–319). Overexpression of ABCB1 (P-glycoprotein) was associated with poor responses to first-line chemotherapy (combined OR [CI], 0.16 [0.05–0.59]; n = 322). Overexpression and amplification of TOP2A (topoisomerase II-alfa) were more frequently observed in patients who responded to first-line chemotherapy (combined OR [CI], 2.73 [1.02–7.27]; n = 323). Overexpression of ERBB2 (c-erbB2) was associated with favorable responses in patients treated with both first-line anthracycline-based chemotherapy and second-line taxane-based chemotherapy (combined ORs [CIs], 1.60 [1.19–2.17]; n = 1807 and 2.24 [1.06–4.74]; n = 259, respectively). BCL2 overexpression was associated with resistance to first-line chemotherapy (combined OR [CI], 0.44 [0.21–0.91]; n = 816). Conclusion   ABCB1, TOP2A, ERBB2, and BCL2 were good candidates for future clinical trials of predictive chemosensitivity tests in patients with breast cancer.     

Adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma: psychosocial implications.

Fifty women receiving adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for Stage II breast carcinoma were interviewed in an effort to describe the psychosocial effect of the treatment. Perceptions of emotional distress and behavioral disruption were rated in five areas, yielding a rating of overall level of disruption and distress. Results showed that all women experienced adverse changes while receiving adjuvant treatments. Of the 50 women, 88% described a decrease in activities related to the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy; 54% reported an increased financial burden; and 41% claimed that their family and/or sexual life had been adversely affected. Despite these adverse changes, 74% of these patients "would definitely" recommend the treatment to friends in a similar situation. Results from this preliminary study may provide useful information to potential participants in adjuvant trials and to the physicians who conduct such trials.     

Prognostic and predictive molecular markers in colorectal carcinoma

Tumour markers are molecules occurring in blood or tissue that are associated with cancer and whose measurement or identification is useful in patient diagnosis or clinical management. The ideal marker would occur only in patients with malignancy, and would correlate with stage and response to treatment, however, to date there are few reliable prognostic markers in colorectal cancer (CRC), consequently much research is focused on identifying such markers. This review aims to summarise the most important currently available markers in CRC that provide prognostic or predictive information. Amongst others, it covers serum markers such as CEA and CA19-9, markers expressed in tumour tissue such as thymidylate synthase and also the expression/loss of expression of certain oncogenes and tumour suppressor genes such as K-ras and p53. The prognostic value of genomic instability, angiogenesis and proliferative indices such as apoptotic index is discussed.     

Primary systemic chemotherapy of breast cancer: indication and predictive factors

Primary systemic chemotherapy has become a standard of care for operable breast cancer patients who are candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. Induction of pathological complete response (pCR) is one of the main goals of primary systemic chemotherapy because patients with pCR have shown a better prognosis. The definition of pCR has varied across clinical trials. It would be ideal for all researchers to use the same terminology in describing pathologic response. Identification of accurate predictive factors of pCR to primary systemic chemotherapy is urgent, because patients with a low chance of pCR and clinical response should be spared unnecessary toxicity. Early response to primary systemic chemotherapy might be correlated with a high probability of a pCR. Therefore, evaluation of early response is useful to avoid unnecessary toxicity without potential benefit from chemotherapy.     

Place of anatomopathology in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prognostic and predictive markers: example of breast cancer

The pathologist plays a key role in the optimal management of patients receiving an induction or a neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The evaluation of the pre-treatment biopsy helps to establish key patient-management parameters such as tumor type, SBR grade and immunohistochemical parameters. This evaluation provides predictive parameters with regards to drug response such as hormonal status, proliferation factors and overexpression of Her-2. The evaluation of the post-treatment tumour residue helps to determine tumour response to treatment and prognosis, as well as to adjust adjuvant regimens. It is essential to standardize these histopathological procedures.     

Young age and outcome for women with early-stage invasive breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Patients with invasive breast carcinoma who are ages 35-40 years or younger at the time of diagnosis have been found in several studies to have worse prognosis and higher local failure rates after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) compared with older patients. However, it is uncertain whether specific clinical, pathologic, or treatment factors affect these results, or whether mastectomy yields a better outcome. METHODS: Articles addressing how patient age at the time of diagnosis affects treatment outcome were identified through the MEDLINE and CancerLit databases and the reference lists of relevant articles. RESULTS: Young age was found to remain an independent risk factor for worse outcome after either BCT or mastectomy. Limited evidence did not demonstrate a superior outcome with mastectomy compared with BCT. Recent studies of BCT still reported young age to be associated with higher local recurrence rates compared with that for older patients, but their interpretation was hampered by inadequate margin assessment for ductal carcinoma in situ. Adjuvant chemotherapy has been found to improve local control rates substantially for young patients after BCT. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, there are insufficient data to determine whether young patients have superior long-term outcome if treated by mastectomy compared with BCT, or whether having truly uninvolved margins abrogates their increased risk of local failure after BCT. When meticulous attention is given to surgical techniques and margin status, it appears that young age at the time of diagnosis need not be a contraindication to BCT.     

Taxanes with anthracyclines as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The magnitude of the benefit of adding taxanes to anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma is still unclear. The authors performed a pooled analysis as well as a meta-analysis of all Phase III trials, to determine whether the combination of anthracyclines plus taxanes provided an advantage over standard anthracyclines-based regimens. METHODS: All Phase III peer-reviewed published or presented trials were considered eligible. A pooled analysis (Method A) and a literature-based meta-analysis (Method B) were accomplished, and event-based relative risk ratios (RR(A-B)) with 95% confidence intervals were derived. Both analyses were performed to examine for significant differences in time to disease progression (TTP), overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), complete response rate (CR), neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia (FN). For both analyses, a heterogeneity test was applied. RESULTS: Seven trials (2805 patients) were gathered. When data were pooled and plotted, significant differences in favor of taxanes were seen for ORR (RR(A-B) 1.21, P<0.001), CR (RR(A) 2.04; RR(B) 1.81, P<0.001), even though they caused a significant increase in neutropenia (RR(A) 1.19; RR(B) 1.15, P<0.001) and FN (RR(A) 2.82; RR(B) 3.44, P<0.001). A borderline significance in favor of taxanes was seen in TTP (RR(A) 1.10, P=0.05; RR(B) 1.06, P=0.07). A nonsignificant trend for taxanes was found in OS. No significant heterogeneity (except for neutropenia, P<0.01) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The adjunction of taxanes to anthracyclines in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast carcinoma yielded a significant benefit in activity (ORR, CR), a slight advantage in TTP, and a trend in OS, although with a significant cost in hematologic toxicity.