Characterization of benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography laser mammography (CTLM): initial experience

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize benign and malignant breast lesions with computed tomography-laser mammography (CTLM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective study, 100 female patients with 105 breast lesions classified as BIRADS IV to V at mammography underwent mammography, CTLM, and histologic verification at our institution. CTLM images were analyzed by radiologists with knowledge of the lesion's position but who were blinded to histology and morphologic findings from mammography. Two radiologists independently evaluated whether there was increased absorption, a sign of malignancy, on CTLM and assessed the appearance (volumes or linear branching) and shape (round or irregular) of the lesions. RESULTS: Histologic analysis revealed 55 benign (52.4%) and 50 malignant (47.6%) breast lesions. Increased absorption was observed significantly more often in malignant than in benign lesions (70.0% vs. 32.7%, P = 0.028). Invasive cancer showed increased absorption in 76.2%, and ductal carcinoma in situ in 37.5%. Common morphologic characteristics of increased absorption were "volumes" (85.7% of malignant and 77.8% of benign lesions) with round shape (78.1% of malignant and 73.3% of benign lesions). CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that CTLM, when used as an adjunct to mammography, may provide additional information to characterize benign and malignant breast lesions.     

计算机体层激光乳腺摄影在乳腺病变中的应用

目的探讨计算机体层激光乳腺摄影(CTLM)诊断乳腺良恶性病变的可行性。方法对91例乳腺疾病病人的93个病变乳腺逐一进行CTLM检查,最后诊断均经病理证实。观察不同病变的CTLM表现,并将CTLM所见与临床检查提示的病变位置和病理诊断对照分析。结果成功获得84例病人的86个乳腺CTLM影像,检查成功率为92.5%(扫描层数≥6)。其中,恶性病变的乳腺扫描成功率为88.7%,良性病变成功率为100%(P>0.05)。与乳腺良性肿瘤比较,恶性肿瘤在CTLM影像中表现出更常见(P<0.01)和更明显(P<0.01)的吸光增加。结论通过观察乳腺病变区域对激光的吸收情况,CTLM可以提供乳腺病变血管生成和血流多少的相关信息。     

Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine how often physician-performed high-resolution sonography can detect nonpalpable breast lesions not revealed by mammography. A sonographic classification scheme was tested for its accuracy in predicting malignancy of incidentally detected breast lesions. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Six thousand one hundred thirteen asymptomatic women with breast density grades 2-4 and 687 patients with palpable or mammographically detected breast masses underwent sonography as an adjunct to mammography. All sonographically detected, clinically and mammographically occult breast lesions that were not simple cysts were prospectively classified into benign, indeterminate, or malignant categories. Diagnoses were confirmed by sonographically guided fine-needle aspiration or core needle biopsy. RESULTS: In 6113 asymptomatic women, 23 malignancies in 21 patients were detected with sonography only (prevalence, 0.31%). Five additional malignant lesions were found in patients with a malignant (n = 3) or a benign (n = 2) palpable or mammographically detected index lesion. The mean size of invasive malignancies detected only by sonography was 9.1 mm, which was not significantly different from the mean size of invasive cancers detected by mammography (p = .07). The sensitivity of the prospective sonographic classification for malignancy was 100%, and the specificity was 33.5%. CONCLUSION: The use of high-resolution sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts may lead to detection of a significant number of otherwise occult malignancies that are no different in size from nonpalpable mammographically detected lesions. Prospective classification of these lesions based on sonographic characteristics results in a significant reduction in number of unnecessary biopsies performed.     

Assessment of breast lesions using BI-RADS US lexicon in mammographically dense breasts (ACR categories 3 and 4) with histopathological correlation

Purpose

To assess the role of ultrasonography in detection, and categorization of breast lesions in patients with mammographically dense breasts with the use of the BI-RADS US lexicon.

Patients and methods

This study included 60 female patients (age range from 20 to 80 years, mean 38.3 ± 11.9) complaining of mastalgia, breast lump or nipple discharge with mammographically dense breast tissue. Breast ultrasound was performed to all patients with a 12-MHz linear-array transducer. Sonographic findings of the breast lesions were described and categorized according to the BI-RADS US assessment categories. Biopsy procedures were performed for the sonographically detected breast lesions with histopathological examination of the biopsied tissue.

Results

The main complaint was palpable breast mass encountered in 25 patients, 12 of mastalgia, 4 of nipple discharge, 12 patients were on screening and 7 on follow up. 36 patients were categorized as ACR 3 and 24 ACR 4 regarding the density of their breasts in mammography. Mammography revealed no abnormalities in 31 patients and abnormal in 29 patients, the commonest mammographic finding was breast mass, detected in 19 patients. Ultrasound detected breast lesions in 56 (93.3%) out of 60 patients. BI-RADS US category 2 was the most common category representing 36.7%. Ultrasonography had a diagnostic reliability for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions (p = 0.869) in mammographically dense breasts while mammography was diagnostically unreliable (p = 0.045).

Conclusion

Ultrasound is a mandatory adjunct to mammography in detection and characterization of breast lesions in mammographically dense breasts.     

A multicenter study for the evaluation of the diagnostic efficiency of mammography and echography in nonpalpable breast neoplasms]

The Breast Section of the Italian Society of Radiology set up a cooperative study which included 17 Departments of Radiology and Breast Diagnosis in order to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of US versus mammography in nonpalpable breast lesions. From January 1, 1989 to december 31, 1990, 400 nonpalpable breast lesions (142 benign lesions, 59 in situ and 199 infiltrating carcinomas) were detected by mammography and/or US; they had questionable/suspicious findings which called for further investigation by means of cytology and/or histology. US proved much less sensitive in non-palpable carcinomas than mammography (49.2% vs 93.8%), also in younger women, and failed to detect 50% of the benign/malignant nonpalpable lesions identified by mammography. US sensitivity was directly related to lesion diameter and probe frequency: 38.7% in infiltrating carcinomas < or = 5 mm vs 56.8% in those > 10 mm; 12% in the patients examined with a 5-MHz probe vs 57.7% in those examined with a > or = 7.5-MHz probe. Furthermore, the most significant US patterns of nonpalpable lesion were irregular contours, posterior attenuation and irregular internal echoes, while an irregular skin line and Cooper ligaments had no significant relation with carcinoma. Thus, breast US cannot be used as a screening test on asymptomatic patients not even on young women with radiologically dense breasts. On the contrary, US performed with high-frequency probes is useful in the assessment of nonpalpable lesions identified by mammography, and allows, in many cases, US-guided cytology and preoperative localization.     

MR mammography in the pre-operative staging of breast cancer in patients with dense breast tissue: comparison with mammography and ultrasound

The aim of this study was to determine whether pre-operative MR mammography could predict the extent of breast cancer in patients with dense breasts or whether dense parenchyma will lead to false-positive or inconclusive examinations. Sixty-seven patients with dense breasts with a malignant breast tumor planned for conservative surgery were reviewed. Detection rates of mammography, ultrasound, and MR mammography were studied, and the diameters of the lesions were measured and compared with pathological examination. Pathology revealed breast cancer in 65 patients. Sensitivity for detection of index lesions was 83% for mammography, 70.8% for ultrasound, and 98% for MR mammography. Mammography underestimated tumor extent in 37%, ultrasound in 40%, and MR in 12.5%. Of the 20 patients (31%) with multifocal or multicentric carcinoma, mammography detected the lesions in 35%, ultrasound in 30%, and MR in 100%, with a false-positive rate of 12.5, 14, and 23%. The MR mammography is more accurate in assessing tumor extent and multifocality in patients with dense breasts, but benign changes may lead to false-positive examinations.     

Can contrast enhanced mammography solve the problem of dense breast lesions?

Objective

To assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) as an adjunct to mammography (MX) vs. MX alone and vs. mammography plus ultrasound (US) in dense breasts.

Materials and methods

60 women with suspected findings on MX and/or US underwent CEDM. A pair of low- and high-energy images was acquired using a modified full-field digital mammography system. Exposures were taken in MLO at 2 min and in CC at 4 min after the injection of 1.5 ml/kg of an iodinated contrast agent. Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve were estimated.

Results

The results from pathology identified 16 benign and 44 malignant cases. Areas under the ROC curves were significantly superior for MX + CEDM than it was for MX alone using BI-RADS. Sensitivity was higher for MX + CEDM than it was for MX (97.7% vs. 93.2%) with no loss in specificity. The lesion size was closer to the histological size for CEDM. All 12 histologically proven multifocal lesions were correctly detected by MX + CEDM vs. 6 and 8 lesions by MX and US respectively.

Conclusion

Initial clinical results show that CEDM has better diagnostic accuracy than mammography alone and mammography + ultrasound especially in dense breasts.     

Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts

OBJECTIVE: Mammographically dense breast tissue has been reported both as a cause of false-negative findings on mammography and as an indicator of increased breast cancer risk. We conducted this study to evaluate the role of breast sonography as a second-line screening test in women with mammographically dense breast tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and January 2002, 1517 asymptomatic women with dense breasts and normal mammography and physical examination findings underwent physician-performed breast sonography as an adjunct screening test. Within the study group, 318 women had a first-degree family history or personal history of breast cancer. The high-risk subgroup comprised these women. The detection rate of breast cancer in this subgroup was compared with the detection rate in the remaining study population with baseline risk. RESULTS: Of 1517 women examined, seven breast cancers were diagnosed (cancer-detection rate, 0.46%). Four carcinomas were detected in high-risk women and three in women with baseline risk. The cancer-detection rate in the subgroup of high-risk women was 1.3%, significantly higher (p < 0.04) than the cancer-detection rate of 0.25% in the baseline risk subgroup. All cancers were T1 (range, 4-12 mm; mean, 9.6 mm). Sentinel lymph nodes were negative for cancer in six of seven carcinomas. CONCLUSION: Screening breast sonography in the population of women with dense breast tissue is useful in detecting small breast cancers that are not detected on mammography or clinical breast examination. The use of sonography as an adjunct to screening mammography in women with increased risk of breast cancer and dense breasts may be especially beneficial.     

选择性局部点压联合触诊在致密型乳腺疾病中的诊断价值

目的探讨钼靶局部点压摄影联合触诊对致密型乳腺疾病的诊断价值.资料与方法纳入常规乳腺 X 线摄影表现为致密腺体且影像未见明显异常者133例,分别进行双乳细致触诊,并结合常规体位影像表现,对触诊异常部位进行局部点压摄影,对所获得图像进行再次分析诊断.结果133例局部点压后影像中,69例清楚显示病灶,阳性检出率为51.9%(69/133),其中乳腺内肿块43例,腋下肿块9例,成簇微细钙化2例,局限性致密浸润15例;术后病理提示良性病变59例,恶性病变10例.结论钼靶局部点压摄影联合触诊可提高致密型乳腺中病灶的检出率,减少漏诊.     

Relationship between 18F-FDG uptake and breast density in women with normal breast tissue.

Breast density affects the mammographic detectability of breast cancer. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of breast density on the (18)F-FDG uptake of normal breast tissue. METHODS: The study population consisted of 45 women (median age, 54 y; age range, 42-77 y). All underwent whole-body (18)F-FDG PET for various indications other than breast cancer, and all underwent mammography within a mean of 6.6 +/- 4.9 mo of PET. On the basis of mammographic findings, breasts were categorized as extremely dense, heterogeneously dense, primarily fatty, or entirely fatty. Regions of interest were drawn on every PET image in which breast tissue was visualized. Average and peak standardized uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for the left and right breasts. RESULTS: Mammography showed that 20 of the 45 women had heterogeneously dense breasts, 1 had extremely dense breasts, 20 had primarily fatty breasts, and 4 had entirely fatty breasts. In dense breasts, the average SUV was 0.39 +/- 0.05 (right breast) and 0.36 +/- 0.07 (left breast) and the peak SUV was 0.93 +/- 0.16 and 0.89 +/- 0.18, respectively. The average and peak SUVs were significantly lower for primarily fatty breasts than for dense breasts (P < 0.01). Peak and average SUVs of entirely fatty breasts also differed significantly from peak and average SUVs of dense and primarily fatty breasts (P < 0.01). The impact of hormonal status on SUV was significant but less than the impact of breast density. No significant relationship between average SUV or peak SUV and age or serum glucose level was observed. CONCLUSION: Breast density and hormonal status affect the uptake of (18)F-FDG. Dense breasts exhibit, on average, significantly higher (18)F-FDG uptake than do nondense breasts. However, the highest peak SUV observed in dense breasts was 1.39, which is well below the SUV of 2.5 commonly used as a cutoff between benign and malignant tissue. Therefore, breast density is unlikely to affect the ability of (18)F-FDG PET to discriminate between benign and malignant breast lesions.     

Inconclusive findings at mammography: the value of MR imaging

Summary Purpose: To evaluate the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in the assessment of inconclusive findings at mammography, such as indeterminate focal or diffuse breast abnormalities, post-treatment breasts with extensive scarring, dense breasts, and findings suggesting multifocal or multicentric breast cancer. Material and Methods: 254 patients underwent mammography, sonography, and MRI of the breast. Dynamic MR imaging was done using a thin-section three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence (FLASH, TR = 11.8 ms; TE = 5 ms; flip angle = 25 °) which was applied in a dynamic fashion before and every 90 seconds after injection of gadopentetate dimeglumine. Diagnoses were confirmed at biopsy (n = 165) or by follow-up (n = 89). Results: Among various breast anomalies, the highest proportion of breast cancers was associated with dense breast tissue (27.8 %), architectural distortion (26.9 %), and irregular scars (15.8 %). Sensitivity of dynamic MR imaging was 93.7 %, and specificity was 83.3 %. As compared to mammography and sonography, MR detected 6 occult carcinomas, and showed additional malignant lesions in 19/63 women (30.2 %) with biopsy-proven breast cancer. Conclusion: MR imaging of the breast may provide valuable additional information in indeterminate breast anomalies. However, because of its inherent limitations, it should not replace core needle biopsy in all lesions which are amenable to biopsy. Because of its high sensitivity in the detection of invasive carcinomas in any type of breast tissue, MR imaging is considered the modality of choice in the evaluation of dense breasts in high-risk patients or in patients with clinical suspicion of occult breast cancer, and for preoperative tumor staging.      

Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of breast disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast was performed in 10 volunteers and 102 women with suspected breast disease, using a 0.35-T superconducting magnet. All patients had prior x-ray mammography. MRI was superior to mammography in differentiating solid from cystic lesions and equivalent to mammography in providing information regarding different parenchymal patterns. Of 21 surgically proven carcinomas of the breast, MRI correctly identified 18 and mammography identified 19. The major disadvantage of MRI is its inability to show calcifications, benign or malignant. Future studies will be needed to show the relative values of sonography and MRI in detecting small cysts. In addition, MRI in future should be able to demonstrate small, noncalcified masses in mammographically dense, fibrocystic breasts.     

Breast Density Knowledge in a Screening Mammography Population Exposed to Density Notification

ObjectiveWomen are increasingly informed about their breast density due to state density reporting laws. However, accuracy of personal breast density knowledge remains unclear. We compared self-reported with clinically assessed breast density and assessed knowledge of density implications and feelings about future screening.MethodsFrom December 2017 to January 2020, we surveyed women aged 40 to 74 years without prior breast cancer, with a normal screening mammogram in the prior year, and ≥1 recorded breast density measures in four Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium registries with density reporting laws. We measured agreement between self-reported and BI-RADS breast density categorized as “ever-dense” if heterogeneously or extremely dense within the past 5 years or “never-dense” otherwise, knowledge of dense breast implications, and feelings about future screening.ResultsSurvey participation was 28% (1,528 of 5,408), and 59% (896 of 1,528) of participants had ever-dense breasts. Concordance between self-report versus clinical density was 76% (677 of 896) among women with ever-dense breasts and 14% (89 of 632) among women with never-dense breasts, and 34% (217 of 632) with never-dense breasts reported being told they had dense breasts. Desire for supplemental screening was more frequent among those who reported having dense breasts 29% (256 of 893) or asked to imagine having dense breasts 30% (152 of 513) versus those reporting nondense breasts 15% (15 of 102) (P = .003, P = .002, respectively). Women with never-dense breasts had 6.3-fold higher odds (95% confidence interval:3.39-11.80) of accurate knowledge in states reporting density to all compared to states reporting only to women with dense breasts.DiscussionStandardized communications of breast density results to all women may increase density knowledge and are needed to support informed screening decisions.     

Digital breast tomosynthesis: sensitivity for cancer in younger symptomatic women

Objective:Full-field digital mammography (FFDM) has limited sensitivity for cancer in younger women with denser breasts. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) can reduce the risk of cancer being obscured by overlying tissue. The primary study aim was to compare the sensitivity of FFDM, DBT and FFDM-plus-DBT in women under 60 years old with clinical suspicion of breast cancer.Methods:This multicentre study recruited 446 patients from UK breast clinics. Participants underwent both standard FFDM and DBT. A blinded retrospective multireader study involving 12 readers and 300 mammograms (152 malignant and 148 benign cases) was conducted.Results:Sensitivity for cancer was 86.6% with FFDM [95% CI (85.2–88.0%)], 89.1% with DBT [95% CI (88.2–90%)], and 91.7% with FFDM+DBT [95% CI (90.7–92.6%)]. In the densest breasts, the maximum sensitivity increment with FFDM +DBT over FFDM alone was 10.3%, varying by density measurement method. Overall specificity was 81.4% with FFDM [95% CI (80.5–82.3%)], 84.6% with DBT [95% CI (83.9–85.3%)], and 79.6% with FFDM +DBT [95% CI (79.0–80.2%)]. No differences were detected in accuracy of tumour measurement in unifocal cases.Conclusions:Where available, DBT merits first-line use in the under 60 age group in symptomatic breast clinics, particularly in women known to have very dense breasts.Advances in knowledge:This study is one of very few to address the accuracy of DBT in symptomatic rather than screening patients. It quantifies the diagnostic gains of DBT in direct comparison with standard digital mammography, supporting informed decisions on appropriate use of DBT in this population.     

(99m)Tc sestamibi breast imaging for the examination of patients with dense and fatty breasts: multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of scintimammography as an adjunct to physical examination and mammography in the detection of breast cancer in women with dense and fatty breasts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 558 women were prospectively enrolled from 42 centers in North America. Images were interpreted by readers blinded to the subjects' clinical history, mammographic findings, and other test results. The Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System classification was used to describe breast density. Parenchymal patterns of "heterogeneously dense" and "extremely dense" were used to classify breasts as dense, whereas "almost entirely fat" and "numerous vague densities" defined fatty breasts. Between-group differences were evaluated with the 2 test for categorical variables and Student t test for continuous variables. Accuracy of scintimammography was assessed against the core laboratory histopathologic evaluation, the standard. The 95% CIs around point estimates of sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated with the normal approximation to the binomial distribution. RESULTS: The analyses were based on 580 breasts with an abnormality; 276 (48%) breasts were dense and 228 had a malignant lesion. Diagnostic properties for scintimammography of fatty versus dense breasts were, respectively, sensitivity, 72% versus 70%; specificity, 80% versus 78%; positive predictive value, 72% versus 67%; negative predictive value, 81% versus 81%; and accuracy, 77% versus 75% (all not significant). Scintimammography led to similar and significant changes in the posttest likelihood of cancer for both dense and fatty breasts. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic accuracy of scintimammography is not affected by breast density.     

Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis

Purpose

To analyse the accuracy of dual-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in dense breasts in comparison with contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography (CESM) and conventional mammography (Mx).

Materials and methods

CESM cases of dense breasts with histological proof were evaluated in the present study. Four radiologists with varying experience in mammography interpretation blindly read Mx first, followed by CESM. The diagnostic profiles, consistency and learning curve were analysed statistically.

Results

One hundred lesions (28 benign and 72 breast malignancies) in 89 females were analysed. Use of CESM improved the cancer diagnosis by 21.2 % in sensitivity (71.5 % to 92.7 %), by 16.1 % in specificity (51.8 % to 67.9 %) and by 19.8 % in accuracy (65.9 % to 85.8 %) compared with Mx. The interobserver diagnostic consistency was markedly higher using CESM than using Mx alone (0.6235 vs. 0.3869 using the kappa ratio). The probability of a correct prediction was elevated from 80 % to 90 % after 75 consecutive case readings.

Conclusion

CESM provided additional information with consistent improvement of the cancer diagnosis in dense breasts compared to Mx alone. The prediction of the diagnosis could be improved by the interpretation of a significant number of cases in the presence of 6 % benign contrast enhancement in this study.

Key Points

? DE-CESM improves the cancer diagnosis in dense breasts compared with mammography. ? DE-CESM shows greater consistency than mammography alone by interobserver blind reading. ? Diagnostic improvement of DE-CESM is independent of the mammographic reading experience.     

A comparative study of breast-specific gamma imaging with the conventional imaging modality in breast cancer patients with dense breasts

Objective

The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) as compared with mammography (MMG) and ultrasonography (US).

Methods

This study retrospectively enrolled 121 women with breast cancer (45.0?±?8.1?years) and dense breasts (breast density >50?%). All patients underwent preoperative BSGI, MMG, and US, and the results were correlated with the biopsy results.

Results

In the 121 patients, 153 breast lesions were malignant tumors and 75 lesions were diagnosed as benign tumors. The sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 92.2 and 89.3?%, while the values of MMG and US were 53.6 and 94.7 and 91.5 and 53.3?%, respectively (p?<?0.0001 and p?<?0.0004). In breast lesions ??1?cm, the sensitivity and specificity of BSGI were 80.6 and 91.5?%, which were different from MMG and US, respectively (p?<?0.0001 and p?<?0.0003). Of 28 patients with 59 multiplicities, BSGI and US found 49 lesions and 51 lesions correctly. However, MMG detected only 26 lesions as malignancies.

Conclusion

Given the results of this study, women with dense breasts are not evaluated with MMG at all and went straight to US or MRI in order to minimize radiation exposure. Due to the high false-positive rate of these modalities, BSGI could then be utilized if the US or MRI are positive.     

The incremental contribution of clinical breast examination to invasive cancer detection in a mammography screening program

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the potential added contribution of clinical breast examination (CBE) to invasive breast cancer detection in a mammography screening program, by categories of age and breast density. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We prospectively followed 61,688 women aged 40 years or older who had undergone at least one screening examination with mammography and CBE between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 2000, for 1 year after their mammogram for invasive cancer. We computed the incremental sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of CBE over mammography alone for combinations of age and breast density (predominantly fatty or dense). RESULTS: Mammography sensitivity was 78% and combined mammography-CBE sensitivity was 82%, thus CBE detected an additional 4% of invasive cancers. CBE detected a minority of invasive cancers compared with mammography for all age groups and all breast densities. Sensitivity increased from adding CBE to screening mammography for all ages, from 6.8% in women ages 50-59 with dense breasts to 1.8% in women ages 60-69 years with fatty breasts. CBE generally added incrementally more to sensitivity among women with dense breasts. Specificity and positive predictive value declined when CBE was used in conjunction with mammography, and this decrement was more pronounced in women with dense breasts. CONCLUSION: CBE had modest incremental benefit to invasive cancer detection over mammography alone in a screening program, but also led to greater risk of false-positive results. These risks and benefits were greater in women with dense breasts. The balance of risks and benefits must be weighed carefully when evaluating the inclusion of CBE in a screening examination.     

The role of scintimammography with 99mTc-sestamibi as a complementary diagnostic technique in the detection of breast cancer

Purpose: To prospectively determine the clinical value of scintimammography (Sc) with ^99mTc-sestamibi as a complementary method to triple diagnosis (TD) in detecting malignant disease of the breast.Material and Methods: Ninety-six patients with 119 clinically or mammographically detected breast lesions underwent TD procedures, including clinical examination, mammography and fine-needle aspiration cytology. Prone planar Sc with ^99mTc-sestamibi was performed in all 96 patients. Five groups were defined for diagnosis: 1=normal; 2=benign; 3=probably benign; 4=highly suspect of malignancy; and 5=malignant. All lesions were histopathologically examined. The results of each method per se and the combination of TD with Sc (TD+Sc) were analyzed.Results: Histopathology of the 119 surgically excised breast lesions found 83 malignant and 36 benign lesions. TD missed 6 of 83 carcinomas, resulting in a sensitivity of 92.7%. Sc alone showed sensitivity of 85.5%. The combination TD+Sc missed 1 of 83 carcinomas, and thus had a sensitivity of 98.7%. In mammographically dense breasts both TD and Sc detected 16 of 18 carcinomas, while the combination TD+Sc led to detection of all 18 carcinomas.Conclusion: Adding Sc to TD increases the sensitivity for detection of breast carcinomas. Sc with ^99mTc-sestamibi is recommended as a complimentary method to TD in selected cases such as mammographically dense breasts.