Outcome of sphincteroplasty combined with surgery for urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse

PURPOSE: This is the first reported prospective study comparing outcome and cost in patients undergoing sphincteroplasty for anal incontinence vs. sphincteroplasty performed in combination with one or more procedures for urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. METHODS: We analyzed 44 patients with fecal incontinence who underwent anal sphincter repair alone (20 patients) or in combination with procedures for urinary incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse (24 patients). Information regarding risk factors for fecal incontinence, the degree of incontinence, and the extent that incontinence limited social, physical, and sexual activity was prospectively obtained from questionnaires. Clinic chart reviews and follow-up telephone interviews provided additional data. A cohort of case-matched patients who underwent only urogynecologic procedures was compared retrospectively for operative time, hospital cost, length of stay, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: There were no major complications in any group. The functional outcomes, physical, social, and sexual activity were similar in all three groups. Twenty-two of 24 patients who underwent the combined procedures were glad that they had both procedures concomitantly. CONCLUSION: Combination pelvic floor surgery provides good outcomes and is cost effective. This approach should be offered to women with concurrent problems of fecal and urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse.     

Pessary placement and management

Female pelvic organ prolapse is a common and aggravating condition that few women openly discuss. Fortunately, nonsurgical and surgical treatment options exist for this condition. Nonsurgical treatments include pessaries, which are used to reduce prolapse. The type of pessary depends on the direction and extent or grade of the protruding organ. The use of vaginal pessaries for urinary stress continence is a relatively new treatment option. Proper fit that is determined by trial is essential for effectiveness. Nurses at all levels now need to be familiar with the use of the vaginal pessary for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence. Nurses' roles regarding pessary use need to be clearly defined. Continence nurses should be familiar with the indications for pessary use, the types available for incontinence, and patient education regarding pessary care. Home health and long-term care nurses are frequently asked to periodically remove and insert pessaries. Skills and tips for making removal and insertion as easy as possible need to be disseminated. Advance practice nurses need skills for assessment of prolapse, fitting, and current outpatient pessary care routines. Increasing nurses' understanding of and comfort with pessary use might make a significant difference in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence.     

Prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females with anal incontinence or rectal prolapse

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence, severity, and associations between urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in females after surgery for fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse. METHODS: All patients who underwent surgery for fecal incontinence (Group I) or rectal prolapse (Group II) were compared with a control group of females (Group III) by 43 questions regarding demographic data, past medical and surgical history, and diagnosis and treatment of anal and urinary incontinence and genital and rectal prolapse. The type (stress, urge, and total) of urinary incontinence was determined and graded using an incontinence severity questionnaire (Individual Incontinence Impact Questionnaire). RESULTS: Overall response rate in the three groups of patients was 40.1 percent. The questionnaire was sent to 240 patients operated on for fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse, and 83 of them responded (34.5 percent). The patients were distributed into three groups: Group I consisted of 51 patients (mean age 56.7 +/- 14); Group II consisted of 32 patients (69.7 +/- 11); and Group III consisted of 40 patients (60.5 +/- 16). The prevalence of urinary incontinence in Group I was 27 (54 percent), in Group II was 21 (65.6 percent), and Group III was 12 patients (30 percent; P = 0.003). Genital prolapse was present in 9 (17.6 percent), 11 (34.3 percent), and 5 patients (12.5 percent), respectively (P = 0.03). The prevalence of coexistent urinary incontinence and genital prolapse in both study groups was 22.8 percent (19 patients). There were no statistically significant differences between Groups I and II relative to prevalence, type, and severity of urinary incontinence and genital prolapse, but there were significant differences between the two study groups and the control group. Of the patients in the study group, 67 percent had urinary incontinence before or at the time of surgery. CONCLUSION: There is a higher prevalence and severity of urinary incontinence and pelvic genital prolapse in females operated on for either fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse than in a control group. Therefore, female patients with fecal incontinence or rectal prolapse should be evaluated and treated by a multidisciplinary group of pelvic floor clinicians, including a gynecologist or urologist with special training in female pelvic floor dysfunction and a colorectal surgeon.     

Anatomy and nerve supply of the pelvic floor

In order to guarantee urinary and fecal continence as well as correct pelvic statics, the perfect neuroanatomical integrity of the pelvic floor muscles is mandatory. As Dickinson stated: "There is no considerable muscle in the body whose form and function are more difficult to understand than those of the levator ani, and about which such nebulous impressions prevail". Clinical implications of pelvic floor anatomy and nerve supply are evident: a denervation of this muscle group and the consequent muscle dysfunction could result in urinary and/or fecal incontinence, as well as pelvic organ prolapse.     

Frequency of anal incontinence and results of pelvic viscerography in 291 women with pelvic organ prolapse

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of anal incontinence in a population of 291 women with pelvic organ prolapse and evaluate the results of pelvic viscerogram in this situation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Each patient answered a standardized questionnaire on medical, obstetric and surgical past histories and answers were logged in a database. The viscerograms were performed by a single specialized radiologist. RESULTS: All patients but one were parous. The prevalence of anal incontinence was 26.1%. Stress urinary incontinence and urge urinary incontinence were significantly associated with anal incontinence. No obstetric or surgical risk factor for anal incontinence was demonstrated. Viscerography demonstrated rectoceles (n=86, 29.1%), enteroceles (n=77, 26.5%), cystoceles (n=174, 59.8%), and intra-anal rectal prolapse (n=106, 36.4%). A significant association was found between intra-anal rectal prolapse and anal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Anal incontinence is frequent in patients with pelvic organ prolapse, even more so in the presence of urinary incontinence, and should be investigated by pelvic viscerography. Pelvic floor dysfunction is frequently associated with enteroceles, rectoceles and rectal prolapse. Pelvic viscerograms should be systematically performed in the diagnostic work-up in patients with pelvic organ prolapse when surgical treatment is considered.     

Functional Outcomes for Incontinence and Prolapse Surgery

The majority of women with pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence report more than one symptom that affects urinary, bowel, or sexual function. Most research studies on outcomes following surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and stress incontinence focus on anatomic outcomes and relief of symptoms specific to prolapse and/or stress incontinence. Pelvic symptoms related to voiding function such as de novo urgency or incontinence, bowel function, and sexual function are clinically important outcomes but are infrequently reported. Deterioration of pelvic symptoms postoperatively is associated with decreased patient satisfaction, which underscores the importance of effectively assessing functional and anatomic treatment outcomes. Future studies of reconstructive pelvic surgery should routinely include multiple domain functional outcomes specifically addressing voiding, defecatory, and sexual function.     

Biomaterials in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: An update

Pelvic reconstructive surgeons use biomaterials in many surgical techniques for various indications. Synthetic meshes and biologic grafts have been incorporated in the surgical treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. These materials are also used to correct stress urinary incontinence in men and women. In women, suburethral slings are placed via a number of techniques (retropubic, transobturator) to provide support and facilitate urethral coaptation. In men, support is achieved through mechanical compression and membranous urethra elongation. Recent innovations include a transobturator sling for male stress urinary incontinence, suburethral mini slings for female stress incontinence, and transvaginal mesh to treat pelvic organ prolapse. However, available data on newer techniques are short-term and lack prospective studies and case reports are beginning to emerge describing rare, though serious, complications unique to these newer techniques.     

Lower urinary tract and bowel dysfunction after incontinence and prolapse interventions

The incidence of anti-incontinence procedures and surgery for prolapse repairs has increased significantly over the past decade. As more clinicians have embarked on performing these surgeries using new techniques and variations on traditional repairs, complications are starting to be recognized. We review the literature, focusing on postoperative lower urinary tract and bowel dysfunction following surgery for incontinence and pelvic prolapse. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature on interventions for urinary incontinence and pelvic prolapse using MEDLINE and resources cited in those peer-reviewed papers. Postoperative voiding dysfunction including symptomatic bladder outlet obstruction, de novo urgency and urge incontinence, and recurrent stress urinary incontinence appear to be the most common voiding issues after anti-incontinence surgery, with rates varying based on the type of sling used. Bowel dysfunction following prolapse surgery can occur after rectocele repair and sacrocolpopexy or other apical repair and may vary based on the surgical technique and graft reinforcement used. Success rates for incontinence and prolapse repairs remain stable. With the introduction of new techniques, it is important to consider potential postoperative bladder and bowel effects so that clinicians may counsel their patients appropriately prior to intervention.     

中老年女性盆腔器官脱垂患者尿动力学检查106例临床分析

目的探讨女性盆腔脏器脱垂（pelvic organ prolapse,POP）的尿动力学特点,了解盆腔脏器脱垂与压力性尿失禁（stress urinary incontinence,SUI）的关系。方法对2006年1月至2009年12月在本院就诊的106例女性盆腔脏器脱垂患者,采用盆腔脏器脱垂评估分类法（pelvic organ prolapse quantitative examination,POP-Q）评估,并进行尿动力学检查,测定尿动力学参数,对结果进行统计学分析。结果 106例盆腔脏器脱垂患者中,合并SUI 76例（Ⅰ型SUI 36例,Ⅱ型24例,Ⅲ型16例）（71.7%,76/106）,混合性尿失禁10例（9.4%,10/106）。结论盆腔脏器脱垂与SUI密切相关。尿动力学检查在女性盆腔脏器脱垂的诊断治疗方面具有重要指导意义。     

Female pelvic floor dysfunction--an imaging perspective

Female pelvic floor dysfunction encompasses a range of morbidities, including urinary incontinence, female pelvic organ prolapse, anal incontinence and obstructed defecation. Patients often present with symptoms covered by several specialties including gastroenterology, colorectal surgery, urology and gynecology. Imaging can therefore bring clinicians from multiple specialties together by revealing that we frequently deal with different aspects of one underlying problem or pathophysiological process. This article provides an interdisciplinary imaging perspective on the pelvic floor. Modern pelvic floor imaging comprises defecation proctography, translabial and endorectal ultrasound, and static and dynamic MRI. This Perspectives focuses on the potential use of translabial ultrasound, including 3D and 4D applications, for diagnosis of pelvic floor disorders. Over the next decade, pelvic floor imaging will most likely be integrated into mainstream diagnostics in obstetrics and gynecology and colorectal surgery. Using imaging to facilitate communication between different specialties has the potential to greatly improve the multidisciplinary management of complex pelvic floor disorders.     

Obstructive Defecation in Middle-aged Women

Obstructive defecation, a significant contributor to constipation, is frequently reported in middle-aged women, yet few population-based studies have established prevalence in this group. We analyzed data from the Reproductive Risks for Incontinence Study at Kaiser, a population-based cohort of racially diverse women, 40-69 years old, to describe the prevalence of obstructive defecation and identify associated risk factors. The Reproductive Risks for Incontinence Study at Kaiser is a randomly selected cohort of 2,109 women in the Kaiser Medical System. Obstructive defecation, determined by self-report, was defined as difficulty in passing stool, hard stool, straining for more than 15 min, or incomplete evacuation, occurring at least weekly. Age, race, income, education, drinking, health status, parity, pelvic organ prolapse, urinary incontinence, number of medications, hysterectomy, surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, colectomy, irritable bowel syndrome, and body mass index were assessed for both their univariate and multivariate association with obstructive defecation. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the independent association between associated factors and the primary outcome of obstructive defecation. Obstructive defecation that occurred at least weekly was reported by 12.3% of women. Significant independent risk factors included irritable bowel syndrome [odds ratio 1.78, (95% confidence interval 1.21-2.60)], vaginal or laparoscopic hysterectomy [2.01 (1.15-3.54)], unemployment [2.33 (1.39-3.92)], using three or more medications [1.81 (1.36-2.42)], symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse [2.34 (1.47-3.71)], urinary incontinence surgery [2.52 (1.29-4.90)], and other pelvic surgery [1.35 (1.03-1.78)]. We concluded that obstructive defecation is common in middle-aged women, especially those with a history of treatment for pelvic floor conditions. Women who had undergone laparoscopic/vaginal hysterectomies or surgery for pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence had a nearly two times greater risk of weekly obstructive defecation. Demographic factors, with the exception of employment status, were not significant, indicating that obstructive defecation, although widespread, does not affect any particular group of women.     

The anatomy of incontinence--what practitioners and patients need to know

Stress urinary incontinence, a common problem for many women, is caused by hypermobility of the urethra and sphincteric deficiency. Vaginal detachments result in urethral hypermobility and vaginal prolapse. The focus for most clinicians has been solely on the urethra as the contributing factor to stress incontinence. However, to ensure success of continence surgery, a frequently used treatment with many procedural options, a concerted effort must be made to evaluate the global health of the vagina, treat all existing defects, and recreate normal pelvic support anatomy. The anatomy of urinary incontinence, the history of surgical procedures, as well as the advantages and disadvantages of current surgical techniques are described.     

Perineal descent and levator ani hernia: a dynamic magnetic resonance imaging study

PURPOSE: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse often have multifocal pelvic floor defects that are not always evident of physical examination. In this study, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic patients with pelvic floor prolapse demonstrated unsuspected levator ani hernia. This study was designed to identify any specific symptoms and/or physical findings associated with these hernias.METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients with pelvic organ prolapse, fecal and/or urinary incontinence, or chronic constipation received standardized questionnaires, physical examination, and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Fishers exact test was used to compare symptoms and examination findings between patients with or without levator ani hernia.RESULTS: Twelve patients (15 percent) were found to have unilateral (n = 8) or bilateral (n = 4) levator ani hernias on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. No one specific symptom was directly associated with the presence of a levator ani hernia. Furthermore, levator ani hernias were not found more frequently in patients with previous pelvic floor surgery. Perineal descent on physical examination was associated with the finding of a levator ani hernia in nine patients (P = 0.02). Although not statistically significant, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of levator ani hernia in females using estrogen replacement therapy (P = 0.06).CONCLUSIONS: Patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse and perineal descent on physical examination may have a levator ani hernia. Although the significance of levator ani hernia needs to be determined, the recurrence rate after the surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse remains unacceptably high, and ongoing investigation of all associated abnormalities is warranted.Data were obtained from the Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Database. Poster presentation at The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgery Meeting, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.     

Is there a role for concomitant pelvic floor repair in patients with sphincter defects in the treatment of fecal incontinence?

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: More than half of all patients who undergo overlapping anal sphincter repair for fecal incontinence develop recurrent symptoms. Many have associated pelvic floor disorders that are not surgically addressed during sphincter repair. We evaluate the outcomes of combined overlapping anal sphincteroplasty and pelvic floor repair (PFR) vs. anterior sphincteroplasty alone in patients with concomitant sphincter and pelvic floor defects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed all patients with concomitant defects who underwent surgery between February 1998 and August 2001. Patients were assessed preoperatively by anorectal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, and endoanal ultrasound. The degree of continence was assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively using the Cleveland Clinic Florida fecal incontinence score. Postoperative success was defined as a score of 相似文献   

Dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and cystocolpoproctography alter surgical management of pelvic floor disorders

PURPOSE: Pelvic organ prolapse results in a spectrum of progressively disabling disorders. Despite attempts to standardize the clinical examination, a variety of imaging techniques are used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate dynamic pelvic magnetic resonance imaging and dynamic cystocolpoproctography in the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders. METHODS: Twenty-two patients were identified from The Johns Hopkins Pelvic Floor Disorders Center database who had symptoms of complex pelvic organ prolapse and underwent dynamic magnetic resonance, dynamic cystocolpoproctography, and subsequent multidisciplinary review and operative repair. RESULTS: The mean age of the study group was 58 ± 13 years, and all patients were Caucasian. Constipation (95.5 percent), urinary incontinence (77.3 percent), complaints of incomplete fecal evacuation (59.1 percent), and bulging vaginal tissues (54.4 percent) were the most common complaints on presentation. All patients had multiple complaints with a median number of 4 symptoms (range, 2–8). Physical examination, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging, and dynamic cystocolpoproctography were concordant for rectocele, enterocele, cystocele, and perineal descent in only 41 percent of patients. Dynamic imaging lead to changes in the initial operative plan in 41 percent of patients. Dynamic magnetic resonance was the only modality that identified levator ani hernias. Dynamic cystocolpoproctography identified sigmoidoceles and internal rectal prolapse more often than physical examination or dynamic magnetic resonance. CONCLUSIONS: Levator ani hernias are often missed by physical examination and traditional fluoroscopic imaging. Dynamic magnetic resonance and cystocolpoproctography are complementary studies to the physical examination that may alter the surgical management of females with complex pelvic floor disorders.Presented at the meeting of The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Boston, Massachusetts, June 24 to 29, 2000.No reprints are available.     

Urodynamic evaluation of the bladder and pelvic floor

Pelvic floor disorders including lower urinary tract dysfunction are common, and may be evaluated by urodynamic tests, such as cystometry, uroflowmetry, pressure flow studies, electromyography, and video-urodynamics. These urodynamic tests provide objective information regarding the normal and abnormal function of the urinary tract and pelvic floor, and provide a better understanding of the pathophysiologic processes that cause lower urinary tract symptoms. This article describes typical urodynamic studies and their roles in the evaluation of common pelvic floor disorders, including stress urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and pelvic organ prolapse.     

Management of pelvic organ prolapse

Symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse can afflict up to 10% of women. Urinary incontinence, voiding dysfunction or difficulty possibly related to bladder outlet obstruction are common symptoms. Infrequently hydronephrosis or defecatory dysfunction can be seen. The management of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) should start with adequate assessment of all pelvic floor complaints. If a patient is not symptomatic, surgical intervention is usually not indicated. While the use of a variety of graft materials are available today including porcine, dermal and synthetic grafts, that are used in some surgical approaches to pelvic organ prolapse, other more conservative approaches may prove beneficial to many patients. This article describes our approach to the patient with pelvic organ prolapse.     

Management of Mesh-Related Pelvic Inflammation

Purpose of Review

To review mesh used for transvaginal surgeries, specifically slings and prolapse repairs, as well as offer a review of management after mesh-induced inflammation occurs.

Recent Findings

There have been changes to FDA notifications regarding vaginal mesh, with continued high-profile press. The inflammatory changes and possible complications vary with different mesh characteristics. Risk for complications due to transvaginal mesh placed for prolapse is higher than that when placed for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.

Summary

Transvaginal mesh aids in the effective treatment of female stress incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse but holds the possibility for complications. Placement of transvaginal mesh should continue in the hands of specially trained surgeons, who are knowledgeable regarding management of complications.

     

Synthetic biomaterials for pelvic floor reconstruction

Pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence increase with age. The increasing proportion of the aging female population is likely to result in a demand for care of pelvic floor prolapse and incontinence. Experimental evidence of altered connective tissue metabolism may predispose to pelvic floor dysfunction, supporting the use of biomaterials, such as synthetic mesh, to correct pelvic fascial defects. Re-establishing pelvic support and continence calls for a biomaterial to be inert, flexible, and durable and to simultaneously minimize infection and erosion risk. Mesh as a biomaterial has evolved considerably throughout the past half century to the current line that combines ease of use, achieves good outcomes, and minimizes risk. This article explores the biochemical basis for pelvic floor attenuation and reviews various pelvic reconstructive mesh materials, their successes, failures, complications, and management.     

Pelvic organ prolapse: a review

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common medical problem in parous women. This condition usually refers to a combination of deficiencies of the pelvic organs as they relate to support mechanisms of the vaginal wall. Symptoms vary--an accurate diagnosis requires a careful and complete physical examination with attention directed toward the pelvis and perineum. Although many patients will not require surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse, a comprehensive approach to repair in which all of the anatomic defects affecting support are addressed is necessary for successful treatment. Patients presenting with pelvic organ prolapse often provide some of the most complex, challenging, and rewarding cases in reconstructive pelvic surgery. This article addresses the definitions and classifications, prevalence and risk factors, and anatomy and pathophysiology relevant to pelvic organ prolapse. Discussion also includes diagnosis and approaches to management (surgical and nonsurgical) of anterior vaginal wall prolapse, cystourethrocele, apical vaginal prolapse, uterine prolapse and enterocele, posterior vaginal wall prolapse, rectocele, and pelvic floor relaxation and perineal laxity, with indications for and approaches to surgery, along with possible complications.