Differential effects of fluticasone and montelukast on allergen-induced asthma

Early asthmatic responses (EAR) and late asthmatic responses (LAR) to allergen are induced by the local release of a series of bronchoconstrictor mediators, including leukotrienes and histamine. Both anti-leukotrienes and other anti-asthma drugs, such as inhaled glucocorticoids, have been shown to reduce both EAR and LAR. The aim of the present study was to directly compare the effects of regular treatment with an oral anti-leukotriene, montelukast (Mont; 10 mg once daily, for 8 days), and an inhaled glucocorticoid [fluticasone propionate (FP) 250 microg twice daily for 8 days] on the EAR and LAR to an inhaled allergen challenge. Patients with a documented EAR and LAR at a screening visit were randomized to these treatments, or placebo, in a double-blind, double-dummy, crossover fashion. Allergen challenge at a dose causing both an EAR and LAR was given on the eighth day of treatment. The maximum fall in FEV1 during the EAR was 17.8% during placebo treatment, 8.3% during Mont and 16.3% during FP (P <0.05 for Mont vs placebo). The maximum fall during the EAR was 13.8% during placebo treatment, 11.8% during Mont and 2% during FP treatment (P <0.05 for FP vs placebo and FP vs Mont). PC20 methacholine was significantly higher 24 h after allergen challenge during FP-treatment compared with Mont (P <0.05). Both montelukast and fluticasone reduced the relative amount of sputum eosinophils after allergen compared with placebo treatment. This study shows that anti-leukotrienes are effective to attenuate the EAR, whereas inhaled glucocorticoids are more effective than anti-leukotrienes in attenuating the EARs and improves bronchial hyperresponsiveness to a greater extent. In conclusion, inhaled glucocorticoids have overall greater efficacy than oral anti-leukotrienes to attenuate allergen-induced airway responses in mild asthmatic patients.     

Effects of low doses of inhaled fluticasone propionate on inflammation and remodelling in persistent-mild asthma

In asthma a dysregulation of eosinophil apoptosis and an imbalance of metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) and tissue inhibitor metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) play an important role in airway inflammation and remodelling. We evaluated the effects of a low dose of inhaled fluticasone proprionate (FP) (100 microg bid by Diskus) for 4 weeks in 24 steroid naive patients with mild persistent asthma, symptomatic and with a sputum eosinophilia >or=3% on clinical outcomes and inflammatory markers such as the induced sputum eosinophils, the induced sputum apoptotic eosinophils, the levels of MMP-9 and TIMP-1 and their molar ratio in the induced sputum supernatants. After FP treatment forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and FEV1/forced vital capacity values, PEF (L/min), sputum apoptotic eosinophils, and MMP-9/TIMP-1 molar ratio in sputum supernatants of asthmatic subjects were significantly increased in comparison with baseline, while sputum eosinophils significantly decreased. Change (Delta) in FEV1 after treatment with FP negatively correlated with the Delta in sputum eosinophils, while the Delta in MMP-9 values positively correlated with Delta in TIMP-1 values. This study shows that the clinical improvement achieved by the use of low doses of FP in asthmatics is related, at least in part, to the resolution of eosinophilic inflammation and the downregulation of remodelling markers.     

Add‐on montelukast to inhaled corticosteroids protects against excessive airway narrowing

Rationale Excessive airway narrowing in response to broncho‐active stimuli is a predictor for severe exacerbations in asthma. Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) have complementary properties to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on asthma control. Objectives The LTRA montelukast may provide an additional protection against excessive airway narrowing. We tested the add‐on effects of montelukast on the maximal response plateau and PD₂₀ to inhaled methacholine in asthmatics on a stable dose of ICS. Methods Thirty‐one patients with allergic asthma [14M/17F, 19–50 years, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) >70% pred., PD₂₀ <3.9 μmol methacholine], with a twice documented response plateau to methacholine, were randomized in a double‐blind (montelukast 10 mg or matching placebo once daily), 12‐week parallel study. Bronchoprovocation tests with methacholine (0.03–256 μmol or 40% decline in FEV₁) were repeated every 4 weeks and after wash‐out. The main study objectives were changes from baseline in maximal FEV₁ decline at the response plateau (i.e. >2 post‐dose FEV₁ values within 5%) and PD₂₀ to methacholine after 12 weeks' treatment. Results Neither treatment affected baseline FEV₁ (P=0.62). Compared with placebo, montelukast significantly decreased the maximal response plateau to methacholine (mean difference 9.4%; 95% confidence interval 3.9–15.7; P<0.005), improved the FEV₁ decline (mean change in FEV₁ decline was 2.1% [montelukast] and ?0.8% [placebo], respectively, P<0.05), and increased PD₂₀ methacholine (mean change in PD₂₀ of 5.3 [montelukast] and 1.4 [placebo] doubling doses, respectively, P<0.001). Conclusion Add‐on montelukast to ICS has disease‐modifying effects in adults with persistent asthma, and hence reduces the risk of excessive airway narrowing (NCT 00913328). Cite this as: C. S. Ulrik and Z. Diamant, Clinical & Experimental Allergy, 2010 (40) 576–581.     

Randomized placebo-controlled trial comparing fluticasone aqueous nasal spray in mono-therapy, fluticasone plus cetirizine, fluticasone plus montelukast and cetirizine plus montelukast for seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids are considered to be particularly effective in reducing nasal congestion and are therefore recommended as first-line treatment in allergic rhinitis patients with moderate to severe and/or persistent symptoms. OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical efficacy of fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray (FPANS) 200 microg given once daily, administered in mono-therapy or combined therapy with a H1 receptor antagonist (cetirizine, CTZ) or with a leukotriene antagonist (montelukast, MSK), and the combined therapy of CTZ plus MSK in the treatment of patients affected by allergic rhinitis to Parietaria during natural pollen exposure. In addition, we examined the effect of the treatment on eosinophil counts and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal lavage performed at beginning of season, during season and at the end of the season. METHODS: One hundred patients aged 12-50 years (mean+/-SD 31.8+/-9.6) with a history of moderate to severe Parietaria pollen-induced seasonal allergic rhinitis were selected. A randomized, double-blind, double dummy, placebo (PLA)-controlled, parallel-group study design was used. Patients were treated FPANS 200 microg once daily (n=20) or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus CTZ (10 mg) in the morning (n=20), or with FPANS 200 microg once daily, plus MSK (10 mg) in the evening (n=20) or with CTZ (10 mg) in the morning plus MSK in the evening (n=20) or matched PLA (n=20). Assessment of efficacy was based on scores of daily nasal symptoms and on eosinophil counts and ECP in nasal lavage. RESULTS: All treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA in terms of total symptom, rhinorrhea, sneezing and nasal itching scores. Concerning nasal congestion on waking and daily only the groups treated with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy showed significant differences compared with PLA. Comparing the group treated with FPANS alone and the groups treated with FPANS plus CTZ, we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003). The comparison between FPANS plus CTZ and FPANS plus MSK showed significant difference for nasal itching (P=0.003). Finally, there were significant differences between the group treated with FPANS and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK for total symptom score (P=0.009), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and nasal congestion daily (P<0.001). Also the comparisons between the group treated with FPANS plus CTZ and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK demonstrated significant differences (P<0.001) for total symptom, for nasal congestion on waking and for nasal congestion on daily, for rhinorrhea (P=0.04) and for nasal itching (P=0.003) scores. Concerning the comparison between the group treated with FPANS plus MSK and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK we found significant differences for total symptom score (P=0.005), for nasal congestion on waking (P<0.001) and for nasal congestion on daily (P<0.001). No other differences were observed between the groups. Concerning blood eosinophil counts, significant differences were found between the treatments with FPANS in mono-therapy or in combined therapy with PLA group during and at the end of the season (P=0.0003 and P<0.0001, respectively). Concerning eosinophils and ECP in nasal lavage, all treatments showed significant differences (P<0.001) compared with PLA. Besides, there were significant differences (P<0.001) between the groups treated with FPANS alone or in combined therapy and the group treated with CTZ plus MSK. CONCLUSION: The results of this comparative study demonstrate that FPANS is highly effective for treating patients affected by allergic rhinitis, with efficacy exceeding that of CTZ plus MSK in combined therapy. In addition, the regular combined therapy of FPANS plus CTZ or plus MSK would not seem to offer substantial advantage with respect to FPANS in mono-therapy in patients affected by seasonal allergic rhinitis.     

Effects of fluticasone propionate and beclomethasone dipropionate on parameters of inflammation in peripheral blood of patients with asthma

Bronchial inflammation plays a central role in asthma. We investigated whether parameters of inflammation were increased in peripheral blood. Furthermore, we tested whether fluticasone propionate (FP), a new inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), and beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) affected these parameters. FP 750 μg/day and BDP 1500 μg/day were compared in a randomized, crossover study consisting of two 6-week treatment periods, each preceded by a 3-week placebo period. Twenty-one patients with symptomatic asthma completed the study. The results were compared with those of six normal subjects (controls). Immunophenotyping of inflammatory cells was performed in whole blood, and serum eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) was measured. With regard to clinical efficacy, ICS increased PCjo histamine by more than 1.9 doubling doses and FEV, by more than 0.34 1. The number of CD3/HLA-DR+ lymphocytes was significantly increased in asthmatics compared to the normal subjects, both after placebo (P<0.01) and after therapy (P<0.05). The CD3/HLA-DR-H lymphocytes decreased significantly after treatment with FP (P<0.05). Serum ECP was elevated in patients without ICS and decreased after treatment with BDP (P<0.001). In conclusion, the number of CD3/HLA-DR-I- lymphocytes and serum ECP levels were raised in the peripheral blood of symptomatic asthmatics, and decreased by clinically effective doses of ICS. In this respect, FP 750 ng/day was at least as effective as BDP 1500 μg/day.     

Effect of budesonide and montelukast in asthmatic children exposed to relevant allergens

BACKGROUND: Montelukast has been shown to be effective in controlling the increase in exhaled NO in asthmatic children re-exposed to house dust mite (HDM). This study compared the effect of low dose inhaled budesonide and oral montelukast in preventing the expected relapse of airway inflammation and reactivity in a group of 24 mild asthmatic children allergic to HDM after a brief period of exposure to relevant allergens. METHODS: Lung function, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) to methacholine (PC(20)), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) levels and sputum eosinophilia were evaluated. RESULTS: Pulmonary function remained stable. The BHR was unchanged after exposure in the group treated with budesonide, whereas a significant increase (P = 0.028) was observed in the patients receiving montelukast. No significant difference was observed in FeNO levels after exposure to mite antigen in the two groups. In both the groups of asthmatic children we observed a significant increase in sputum eosinophil % after the exposure to mite antigen. CONCLUSIONS: The significant increase in BHR level observed in the group of children receiving montelukast suggests a more comprehensive effect as disease controller by inhaled steroids than by leukotriene antagonist in allergic asthmatic children re-exposed to relevant allergens.     

Influence of different dosage schedules of inhaled fluticasone propionate on peripheral blood cytokine concentrations in childhood asthma

BACKGROUND: Asthma is characterized by eosinophilic airways inflammation with elevated levels of IL-4, IL-5 and sICAM-1, and reduced levels of IL-10 and IFN-gamma. Inhaled corticosteroids powerfully reduce airways inflammation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate if eosinophil counts, serum eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP) and sICAM-1 levels, as well as serum and production of cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IFN-gamma) by peripheral blood monocytes (PBMCs) are useful markers to monitor therapy with inhaled fluticasone propionate (FP) in asthmatic children. METHODS: In a double-blind, 1-year study, 55 asthmatic children (aged 6-10 years) stopped inhaled corticosteroids for a mean period of 24 days and were randomized to receive either FP 200 microg/day (constant dose group), or a starting dose of FP 1000 microg/day with two monthly reductions to 500, 200 and 100 microg/day (stepdown group). Hyper-responsiveness, symptom scores and blood sampling were performed at 2-month intervals. RESULTS: Symptoms and hyper-responsiveness improved significantly in both treatment groups after reintroduction of FP. Eosinophil counts decreased significantly more during the first 2 months of FP in the stepdown group than in the constant dose group (P = 0.03). We found a trend towards a dose-dependent response in changes of eosinophil counts and serum ECP levels during treatment. Serum IL-4 and IL-5 levels were undetectable in the majority of children. No significant effect of the dose of FP on the release of IL-4, IL-5, IL-10 or IFN-gamma by Con A stimulated PBMCs was found. sICAM-1 levels did not significantly differ at any time point between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Serum ECP as well as peripheral blood eosinophils, cytokine production by PBMCs and sICAM-1 levels are insensitive markers in titrating and monitoring therapy with inhaled corticosteroids over a wide dose range in childhood asthma.     

Intranasal and inhaled fluticasone propionate for pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest that nasal treatment might influence lower airway symptoms and function in patients with comorbid rhinitis and asthma. We investigated the effect of intranasal, inhaled corticosteroid or the combination of both in patients with both pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma. METHODS: A total of 262 patients were randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with intranasal fluticasone propionate (INFP) 200 microg o.d., inhaled fluticasone propionate (IHFP) 250 microg b.i.d., their combination, or intranasal or inhaled placebo, in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study. Treatment was started 2 weeks prior to the pollen season and patients recorded their nasal and bronchial symptoms twice daily. Before and after 4 and 6 weeks' treatment, the patients were assessed for lung function, methacholine responsiveness, and induced sputum cell counts. RESULTS: Intranasal fluticasone propionate significantly increased the percentages of patients reporting no nasal blockage, sneezing, or rhinorrhoea during the pollen season, compared with IHFP or intranasal or inhaled placebo. In contrast, only IHFP significantly improved morning peak-flow, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and methacholine PD20, and the seasonal increase in the sputum eosinophils and methacholine responsiveness. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with pollen-induced rhinitis and asthma, the combination of intranasal and IHFP is needed to control the seasonal increase in nasal and asthmatic symptoms.     

Influence of fluticasone and salmeterol on airway effects of inhaled organic dust;an in vivo and ex vivo study

Inhalation of dust from swine confinement buildings induces airway inflammation with an increase in both inflammatory cell numbers and secretion of proinflammatory cytokines in the lungs. It is not known whether anti-asthma drugs, which influence airway inflammation in asthma, also influence the airway reaction to inhaled organic dust. In the present study we examined the effects of a ss2-agonist (salmeterol) and an inhaled steroid (fluticasone) on the swine dust-induced cell and cytokine content of the lower airways, and cytokine release in cultured alveolar macrophages. Healthy volunteers were pretreated with inhaled salmeterol (n = 8), fluticasone propionate (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8) for about 2 weeks and exposed to dust in a pig house. Bronchoalveolar lavage was performed both before medication and after dust exposure. Cell differential counts and cytokine analyses in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) were examined. Alveolar macrophages were cultured and cytokine release was studied, both in unstimulated cells and after lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Unstimulated alveolar macrophages from swine dust-exposed individuals released less IL-6, IL-8 and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) after, than before, exposure (P < 0.01). Medication did not influence basal cytokine production. Fluticasone inhibited LPS-induced IL-6 and IL-8 release (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the groups. There was a large and significant increase (P < 0.05) in alveolar macrophage, granulocyte, lymphocyte numbers, and IL-6 and TNF-alpha content in BALF in all three groups following dust exposure, with no significant difference between the groups. These findings suggest that drugs which are known to influence and control airway inflammation in asthma do not have major effects on airway inflammation induced by the inhalation of organic dust.     

The effect of a single inhaled dose of a VLA-4 antagonist on allergen-induced airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma

Adhesion molecule very late antigen-4 (VLA-4) is implicated in the recruitment and activation of inflammatory cells in asthma, including eosinophils, T cells and mast cells. VLA-4 antagonists have been proposed as a new anti-inflammatory treatment modality for asthma. Therefore, we investigated whether a single inhaled dose of VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X could protect against allergen-induced changes in airway responses and airway inflammation in patients with asthma. We performed a randomized, double-blind, three-way crossover study with single inhaled doses of 3 mg of GW559090X, 500 microg of fluticasone propionate (FP) or placebo in 15 patients with mild intermittent asthma, controlled with short-acting beta(2)-agonists only. All patients developed a late asthmatic response (LAR) after allergen inhalation during screening. Study medication was administered 30 min prior to allergen challenge. Pre-dose and 24 h post-dose PC20 methacholine and levels of exhaled nitric oxide (eNO) were determined. At the given dose, VLA-4 antagonist GW559090X did not attenuate the early asthmatic response (EAR) when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 27.2+/-3.7 and 21.9+/-3.0 respectively (P=0.33); nor the LAR: mean AUC3-8 h(+/-SEM) (%fall h): 98.8+/-12.9 and 94.8+/-6.8 respectively (P=0.84). However, pretreatment with FP did attenuate both EAR and LAR when compared with placebo: mean AUC0-2 h11.6+/-3.3 (P=0.024) and mean AUC3-8 h 6.3+/-7.6 (P<0.001). None of these treatments had an effect on allergen-induced changes in airway hyper-responsiveness or eNO levels. These findings suggest that VLA-4 may not play a major role in allergen-induced airway responses and inflammation in asthma.     

Effects of once daily dosing with inhaled budesonide on airway hyperresponsiveness and airway inflammation following repeated low-dose allergen challenge in atopic asthmatics

BACKGROUND: Repeated low-dose allergen challenge increases airway hyperresponsiveness and sputum eosinophils in atopic asthmatics. Inhaled corticosteroids attenuate the airway responses to high-dose allergen challenge, but have not been evaluated against repeated low dose challenge. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the effects of once daily treatments of two doses of inhaled budesonide on airway responses to repeated low-dose allergen challenge. METHODS: Eight atopic asthmatics with a dual airway responses to inhaled allergen were recruited into a randomized, double-blind crossover, placebo-controlled study. In the mornings of four consecutive days (day 1-day 4), subjects inhaled budesonide 100 microg, 400 microg, or placebo, 30 min before inhaling a concentration of allergen causing a 5% early fall in FEV1. Airway hyperresponsiveness to methacholine and sputum eosinophils were measured at baseline, on the afternoon of day 2, day 4, and 24 h after the last challenge. There was a 1-week washout between each of the three treatment periods. RESULTS: The repeated low-dose allergen challenge induced increases in the percentage sputum eosinophils from 2.0 +/- 0.7% at baseline to 16.6 +/- 7.1% on day 4 (P = 0.002), and this effect was reduced by once daily budesonide 100 microg to 5.6 +/- 1.8% (P = 0. 01) and by once daily budesonide 400 microg to 3.1 +/- 0.9% (P = 0. 004). Also, the allergen-induced methacholine airway hyperresponsiveness which occurred by day 4 (P = 0.03) of the repeated low dose challenge was inhibited by budesonide 400 microg (P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Both budesonide 100 microg and 400 microg inhaled once daily significantly reduces allergen-induced sputum eosinophilia after repeated low dose challenge; however, only the higher dose also attenuates the allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness.     

Effect of salmeterol on allergen-induced airway inflammation in mild allergic asthma

A previous study suggested that the long-acting beta2-adrenergic agonist salmeterol (SM) had inhibitory effects on bronchial mucosal inflammation 6 hours after allergen exposure. To further evaluate the influence of SM on allergen-induced airway inflammation. We studied, in a randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial, 16 mild asthmatic patients who had a dual asthmatic response to allergen inhalation. Subjects received 50 microg of SM or placebo (P), twice daily for 1 week each, separated by a 2-week wash-out period. At the end of each treatment period, after withholding SM for 24 h, they had a methacholine inhalation test (medication was resumed after the test), followed 24 h later by an AC with the concentration of allergen that had induced a LAR at baseline. Airway inflammation was assessed 24 h after the AC by bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) (n = 16) and bronchial biopsies (n = 13). As expected, SM improved baseline FEV1 and PC20 (P < or = 0.009) and decreased the allergen-induced early bronchoconstrictive response. There were no significant differences in BAL cell counts after the two treatments. On bronchial biopsies, numbers (median, mm2) of submucosal CD45 (P: 43 +/- 23; SM: 161 +/- 43, P = 0.031), CD45Ro (P: 37 +/- 19; SM: 126 +/- 41, P = 0.047) and AA1 positive cells (P: 38 +/- 6, SM: 65 +/- 17, P = 0.006) were significantly higher after SM than P treatment. The numbers of CD4 (P: 11 +/- 10; SM: 32 +/- 7, P = 0.085), HLA-DR (P: 65 +/- 30; SM: 116 +/- 36, P = 0.079) and EG2 positive cells (P: 25 +/- 15; SM: 38 +/- 26, P = 0.09) tended to increase with SM treatment. In summary, compared to placebo, 1 week of regular use of SM is associated with an increase in bronchial inflammatory cells 24 h after AC. This is in keeping with the recommendation that salmeterol should only be used with an anti-inflammatory agent, particularly in the context of significant allergen exposure.     

Influence of smoking on airway inflammation and remodelling in asthma

Background Although exposure to tobacco smoke has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, cigarette smoking is still common in the asthmatic population. Induced sputum neutrophilia has been observed in asthmatic smokers, but the effects of regular smoking on their bronchial mucosa morphology remain to be defined. This study documents the inflammatory and remodelling features in bronchial biopsies of smoking compared with non‐smoking asthmatics. Methods We analysed bronchial biopsies from 24 steroid‐naïve young subjects with mild asthma: 12 non‐smoking and 12 currently smoking subjects. In addition to airway morphology assessment, inflammation and remodelling were analysed by immunohistochemistry using antibodies against CD3, CD68, major basic protein, neutrophil elastase, and tryptase. Expression of the cytokines IL‐4, IL‐5, IL‐8, IFN‐γ, transforming growth factor‐β, and TNF was determined by in situ hybridization. Results Compared with non‐smoking asthmatic subjects, smoking asthmatics' bronchial mucosa showed squamous cell metaplasia, in addition to increased expression of subepithelial neutrophil elastase, IFN‐γ, and intraepithelial IL‐8. Conclusions Smoking status modifies morphological and inflammatory processes in young subjects with mild asthma. The changes may possibly affect asthma treatment responses and clinical outcomes.     

Effect of obesity on airway inflammation: a cross-sectional analysis of body mass index and sputum cell counts

BACKGROUND: Several observational studies have demonstrated an association between obesity and asthma. Studies evaluating exhaled nitric oxide levels and obesity have revealed that a higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with elevated exhaled nitric oxide levels. Airway inflammation using sputum cell counts has not been assessed in obese patients with airway diseases. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to determine whether obesity (based on BMI) is associated with eosinophilic or neutrophilic bronchitis. METHODS: The results from a database of induced sputum cell counts were compared with BMI and analysed using correlation statistics, regression and parametric and non-parametric analysis. RESULTS: Seven-hundred and twenty-seven adult participants with an equal number of sputum samples were included in the analysis. BMI varied from 14.5 to 55 kg/m(2). Sputum total cell count (mean+/-SD: 12.9 x 10(6) cell/g+/-21.5), eosinophil percent (median; min to max: 0.3%; 0-89.0), and neutrophil percent (mean+/-SD: 63.5+/-26.6%) were within normal limits. Participants with asthma had a higher percentage of sputum eosinophils than those without asthma (P=0.01). However, there was no difference in the total or differential cell counts among the obese and non-obese participants, when the data were analysed according to BMI category, gender, dose of inhaled corticosteroid, and presence or absence of asthma. CONCLUSION: In this large sample of adult asthmatic and non-asthmatic participants, there was no association between BMI and airway inflammation measured by sputum cell counts. Other mechanisms to explain the relationship between obesity and asthma will need to be explored if this association is to be better understood.     

Childhood Asthma Control Test and airway inflammation evaluation in asthmatic children

Background:  The Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) has been proposed as a tool in assessing the level of disease control in asthmatic children. To evaluate the position of C-ACT in the clinical management of asthmatic children, in relationship to the level of airway inflammation as assessed by fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and with lung function.
Methods:  A total of 200 asthmatic children were included in the study: 47 children with newly diagnosed asthma ('New') and without any regular controller therapy; and 153 children with previously diagnosed asthma, treated according to GINA guidelines, and evaluated during a scheduled follow-up visit ('Follow-up'). Childhood Asthma Control Test, FeNO and lung function [forced expiratory volume 1 (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC)] were evaluated.
Results:  In New vs Follow-up participants, C-ACT score ( P  <   0.001), FVC ( P  <   0.005) and FEV1 ( P  <   0.05) were significantly lower, and FeNO ( P  =   0.011) were significantly higher. In New, but not in Follow-up participants, significant correlations were observed between C-ACT score and FeNO ( r  = −0.51; P  <   0.001), FEV1 ( r  =   0.34; P  =   0.022) and FEV1/FVC ( r  =   0.32; P  =   0.03). This lack of correlation in Follow-up visits seemed attributable to dissociation between inadequately controlled asthma by C-ACT ratings with normalization of other measures such as FeNO levels.
Conclusions:  This study confirms and expands the concept that C-ACT is complementary to, but not a substitute for, other markers of disease control in asthmatic children, especially in the context of follow-up visits.     

Inter-relationships between airway inflammation, reticular basement membrane thickening and bronchial hyper-reactivity to methacholine in asthma; a systematic bronchoalveolar lavage and airway biopsy analysis

Background Asthma is accepted as a disease characterized by airway inflammation, with evidence that airway structural changes, or ‘remodelling’ occurs. There are few studies relating airway physiology, inflammation and remodelling, however. We have carried out a study of inter‐relationships between airway inflammation, airway remodelling, reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickening, and bronchial hyper‐reactivity (BHR), before and after high‐dose inhaled corticosteroid (fluticasone propionate 750 μg b.d.), in a group of relatively mild but symptomatic, steroid naïve asthma patients. Methods Double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled, parallel group study of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in 35 asthmatics, with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and airway endobronchial biopsy (EBB) for inflammatory cell profiles and EBB for airway remodelling carried out at baseline, 3 and 12 months. Results At baseline RBM thickening was related to BAL mast cells and EBB eosinophil counts. In turn baseline log EBB EG2 eosinophil count, log%BAL epithelial cells and log RBM thickness explained 55% of the variability in BHR. Conclusion We provide new information that airway inflammation, remodelling, and BHR in asthma are inter‐related and improved by ICS therapy. Our data potentially support the need for early and long‐term intervention with ICS even in relatively mild asthmatics, and the need to further assess the potential merit of longitudinal BHR testing in management of some patients, as this may reflect both airway inflammation and remodelling.