三腔起搏器的临床应用

应用三腔起搏器治疗病窦以及同时有房室传导异常合并快速房性心律失常患者６例,其中５例为阵发房颤,１例为阵发房扑,心电图示房间阻滞。植入冠状窦电极及普通右房和右室电极,用Ｙ型转换器以右房耳电极为负极,冠状窦电极为正极构成新的双极电极。将４例患者ＤＤＤ起搏器调至ＡＡＴ模式,２例患者为ＤＤＤ模式,房性快速心律失常消失。随访２～６个月,疗效满意。三腔心脏起搏器适用于治疗病窦并有房室传导异常合并房内阻滞的阵发房扑和房颤的患者。     

Conduction abnormalities detected by electrophysiologic testing following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect

Since 1983 we have performed electrophysiologic studies in 6 patients who had previously undergone repair of an ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect. Information obtained during electrophysiologic studies was crucial in guiding appropriate pacemaker therapy in these patients. As judged from the resting electrocardiogram, sinus or junctional bradycardia was present in 3/6, atrial flutter / fibrillation in 2/6, and paced rhythm in 2 patients who had had ventricular pacemakers implanted for complete atrioventricular block. During maximal exercise testing 4 patients had reduced heart rates; 2 had sudden drops in heart rate at 1 min postexercise; 1 patient had exercise induced ventricular bigeminy; and 1 patient with atrial flutter and 2: 1-4: 1 block at rest developed 1: 1 conduction during Stage II with an effective ventricular rate of 220/min. During electrophysiologic studies, the maximum corrected sinus node recovery time was abnormal in five of the six, ranging from 410 to 5630 msec. There was no spontaneous atrial rhythm in the other patient. Complete atrioventricular block was present in 2 patients while the atrioventricular Wenckebach phenomenon occurred abnormally at atrial pacing cycle lengths greater than 450 msec in 2 others. Supraventricular tachycardia or atrial flutter/fibrillation, was either spontaneous or induced in 2/6 patients, while ventricular tachycardia was induced in 1/3 patients who underwent programmed ventricular stimulation. Electrophysiologic studies were important in unmasking severe sinus node disease in 3 patients and atrioventricular node disease in 2. We therefore recommend that electrophysiologic studies be strongly considered as part of the evaluation of conduction abnormalities following repair of ostium primum atrioventricular septal defect.     

Sinus node-atrioventricular node isolation: long-term results with the "corridor" operation for atrial fibrillation

The "corridor" operation is designed to restore sinus rhythm to patients with atrial fibrillation by electrically isolating the sinus node, a band of atrial tissue and the atrioventricular (AV) node from the remaining atrial tissue. Nine patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation underwent this operation; four patients had chronic atrial fibrillation and five had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation; the mean duration of symptoms was 12 +/- 8 years. Patient ages ranged from 25 to 68 years (mean 48 +/- 12). At preoperative electrophysiologic study, no patient had evidence of an accessory AV pathway or AV node reentry. Sinus node recovery time could not be determined in five patients because of recurrent atrial fibrillation during or before programmed stimulation. At operation the corridor of atrial tissue connecting the sinus and AV nodes was successfully isolated from the remaining left and right atrial tissue in all patients. One patient required early reoperation for recurrent atrial fibrillation before hospital discharge. At the predischarge electrophysiologic study, the corridor remained isolated in all patients except for one patient who had intermittent conduction between the corridor and excluded right atrium. One patient had nonsustained atrial fibrillation and one had atrial tachycardia evident in the corridor. Atypical AV node reentry of uncertain significance was induced in one other patient. Over a total follow-up of 191 patient months (mean 21 +/- 20), seven patients remained free of atrial fibrillation. Two patients had recurrent atrial fibrillation, which in one patient was effectively controlled by a single antiarrhythmic agent. A permanent pacemaker was implanted in four patients for sinus node dysfunction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transient atrioventricular block after open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease

The records of 22 patients with transient atrioventricular (AV) block after open-heart surgery for congenital heart disease from 1972 to 1978 were reviewed to determine the natural history of this entity. Preoperatively, no patient had AV block; 3 had right bundle branch block (BBB), 1 had left BBB and 5 had nonspecific intraventricular conduction delay. Complete AV block developed in 20 patients and Mobitz II AV block in 2. Transient AV block occurred intraoperatively in 14 patients and within 48 hours postoperatively in 8; AV block persisted for greater than or equal to 48 hours postoperatively in all patients, for a mean of 7.3 days (range 2 to 28). During a follow-up of 5.5 years (range 2.5 to 10), late AV block developed in 2 patients. None of the 18 patients whose escape QRS complex morphology during AV block was similar to the final QRS complex during normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with AV conduction had late AV block, whereas 2 of the 4 in whom it differed did (p less than 0.01). There was no difference in the escape rate between the 2 groups. Thus, late development of high-grade AV block is infrequent among patients with transient postoperative AV block. An escape QRS complex during postoperative AV block that differs from the QRS complex seen on recovery of normal sinus rhythm or atrial fibrillation with anterograde conduction may identify those at high risk of late AV block.     

Studies on second-degree atrioventricular block during atrial fibrillation]

The degree of AV block after cardioversion in 80 episodes of atrial fibrillation in 61 patients who suffered from atrial fibrillation associated with second-degree AV block was observed. Only in 34 of the 80 episodes the electrocardiogram showed first-degree AV block. The remaining 46 had normal AV conduction. No second-degree block was found. It demonstrates that second-degree AV block during atrial fibrillation is not identical with that in sinus rhythm.     

Antegrade conduction and AV node function in patients with unidirectional retrograde accessory pathways

In 26 patients with unidirectional retrograde accessory pathways (URAP), antegrade conduction properties were evaluated. During electrophysiologic study the interval from the low septal right atrial potential to the His bundle potential (LSRA-H) in sinus rhythm (SR) was found to be less than 60 msec in 7 out of the 18 patients with left-sided URAP and in one out of two patients with septal URAP. Each of the six patients with right-sided URAP had an LSRA-H equal to or greater than 70 msec. During atrial extrastimulus testing, LSRA-H failed to prolong more than 100 msec (LSRA-H increment equal to or less than 100 msec) in four of six patients with left-sided URAP and LSRA-H of less than 60 msec in SR as well as in the one of two patients with septal URAP in whom the LSRA-H in SR was less than 60 msec. During rapid atrial pacing, we found 1:1 AV node conduction at a pacing rate of more than 200 bpm in the one patient with septal URAP and in 7 out of 14 patients with left-sided URAP who could be assessed. Three of these patients had progression from 1:1 AV conduction to 2:1 AV block without intervening Wenckebach. In conclusion, accelerated AV node conduction in SR and reduced AV node function during rapid atrial pacing or extrastimulus testing was found in 44% of our patients with left-sided or septal URAP. Since these patients are at higher risk for faster ventricular response to atrial flutter and fibrillation and for high frequency during supraventricular tachycardia, these findings were of clinical relevance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Electrophysiologic findings after Fontan repair of functional single ventricle

Cardiac arrhythmias are well recognized sequelae of the Fontan operation for complex congenital anomalies. In this study the electrophysiologic effects of the Fontan procedure were evaluated in 30 patients who underwent cardiac catheterization with electrophysiologic study 1.9 +/- 1.3 years (mean +/- SD) after modified Fontan repair for functional single ventricle. Abnormalities of sinus node or ectopic pacemaker automaticity were detected in 50% (15 patients) by determination of a prolonged corrected sinus node or pacemaker recovery time. Total sinoatrial conduction time was prolonged in 50% of the patients with normal sinus rhythm. Sinus node or ectopic atrial pacemaker function was entirely normal in only 43% of patients. The predominant atrial rhythm was normal sinus in 70% and ectopic atrial or junctional in 30%. Abnormalities of atrial effective and functional refractory periods were noted in 43% of patients and were most pronounced at faster paced cycle lengths. Atrial endocardial catheter mapping revealed intraatrial conduction delays between adjacent sites in 76% of the patients tested and in eight of nine patients with inducible intraatrial reentry. Programmed atrial stimulation induced nonsustained supraventricular arrhythmias in 10% of the 30 patients and sustained arrhythmias in 27%. Intraatrial reentry was the most common inducible arrhythmia and was present in seven of the eight patients with sustained and two of the three patients with nonsustained atrial arrhythmias. Atrioventricular conduction abnormalities were noted in 10% (three patients). No patient had inducible ventricular arrhythmias with programmed ventricular stimulation. The electrophysiologic findings after Fontan repair include abnormal sinus node function, prolonged atrial refractoriness, delayed intraatrial conduction and inducible atrial arrhythmias.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Development of sinus node disease in patients with AV block: implications for single lead VDD pacing

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence of sinus node disease after pacemaker implantation for exclusive atrioventricular (AV) block. DESIGN: 441 patients were followed after VDD (n = 219) or DDD pacemaker (n = 222) implantation for AV block over a mean period of 37 months. Sinus node disease and atrial arrhythmias had been excluded by Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise preoperatively in 286 patients (group A). In 155 patients with complete AV block, a sinus rate above 70 beats/min was required for inclusion in the study (group B). Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise were performed two weeks, three months, and every six months after implantation. Sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min, sinoatrial block, sinus arrest, or subnormal increase of heart rate during treadmill exercise were defined as sinus node dysfunction. RESULTS: Cumulative incidence of sinus node disease was 0.65% per year without differences between groups. Clinical indicators of sinus node dysfunction were sinus bradycardia below 40 beats/min in six patients (1.4%), intermittent sinoatrial block in two (0.5%), and chronotropic incompetence in five patients (1.1%). Only one of these patients (0.2%) was symptomatic. Cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation was 2.0% per year, independent of the method used for the assessment of sinus node function and of the implanted device. CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for isolated AV block, sinus node syndrome rarely occurs during follow up. Thus single lead VDD pacing can safely be performed in these patients.     

Use of intravenous adenosine in sinus rhythm as a diagnostic test for latent preexcitation

In a proportion of patients with left free wall accessory connections, preexcitation is apparent only during atrial arrhythmias or atrial pacing (latent preexcitation). These patients may be at risk of a rapid ventricular response to atrial fibrillation despite the absence of preexcitation in sinus rhythm. The ability of intravenous adenosine to unmask latent preexcitation was evaluated in 22 patients with a history of documented supraventricular tachycardia and a normal electrocardiogram during sinus rhythm. Preexcitation was unmasked in response to adenosine in 4 patients: all 4 were shown to have latent preexcitation at electrophysiologic study. In 12 patients atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction delay or block was induced without preexcitation after adenosine (first-degree AV block in 8, second-degree block in 4): at subsequent electrophysiologic study none of these patients was found to have latent preexcitation. Five patients had little or no PR prolongation in response to adenosine: of these, 2 were shown to have latent preexcitation at electrophysiologic study. Atrial fibrillation was induced in 1 patient and a narrow complex regular tachycardia in another after intravenous adenosine. Intravenous adenosine during sinus rhythm is capable of producing AV nodal conduction delay or block in 73% of patients with a history of supraventricular tachycardia: in these patients adenosine provides a diagnostic test that is both 100% sensitive and 100% specific for latent preexcitation. In those patients in whom adenosine does not produce AV conduction delay or block, further investigation is required to establish or refute the diagnosis of latent preexcitation.     

Atrial contraction is an important determinant of pulmonary venous flow

Pulmonary venous flow has two phases (systolic and diastolic) in normal subjects when studied by pulsed Doppler echocardiography. Only one phase of pulmonary venous flow (diastolic) was observed in six patients without synchronous atrial contraction (four patients with atrial fibrillation and two with complete atrioventricular [AV] block). This pattern reversed to normal (biphasic) when AV synchrony was reestablished by cardioversion to sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation and by AV sequential pacing in patients with complete AV block. Thus, both atrial and ventricular contraction and relaxation are important determinants of pulmonary venous flow.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic use of adenosine in patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias

Adenosine has been shown to affect both sinus node automaticity and atrioventricular (AV) nodal conduction. The effects of increasing doses of intravenous adenosine were assessed in 46 patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Adenosine reliably terminated episodes of supraventricular tachycardia in all 16 patients with AV reciprocating tachycardia, in 13 of 13 patients with AV nodal reentrant tachycardia and in 1 of 2 patients with junctional tachycardia with long RP intervals. Adenosine produced transient high grade AV block without any effect on atrial activity in six patients with intraatrial reentrant tachycardia, four patients with atrial flutter, three patients with atrial fibrillation and in single patients with either sinus node reentry or an automatic atrial tachycardia. The dose of adenosine required to terminate episodes of supraventricular tachycardia was variable (range 2 to 23 mg). Side effects were minor and of short duration. These results demonstrate that adenosine is useful for the acute therapy of supraventricular tachycardia whenever reentry through the AV node is involved. When arrhythmia termination is not affected, atrial activity may be more readily analyzed during adenosine-induced transient AV block.     

Effects of intravenous verapamil on cardiac arrhythmias and on the electrocardiogram.

The effects of intravenous verapamil on the electrocardiogram in 15 patients with heart disease in sinus rhythm and in 44 patients with supraventricular and ventricular tachyarrhythmias were evaluated. Verapamil prolonged the P-R interval without effect on the QRS duration or the Q-Tc interval. In patients with atrial flutter and fibrillation, A-V block was increased, with slowing of the ventricular rate, in almost all cases but sinus rhythm was restored in only 1 of 12 patients in atrial fibrillation and in 2 of the 11 patients with flutter. Verapamil had no effect in 3 patients with atrial fibrillation complicating WPW syndrome; in 1 of 5 patients with ventricular tachycardia it caused reversion to sinus rhythm. Sinus rhythm was restored promptly by verapamil in 13 of 17 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias; in 2 others, sinus rhythm became established 1 to 2 hours after administration of the drug. Transient hypotension, not requiring treatment, was the only side effect noted but not in the patients with supraventricular tachycardias, in whom blood pressure generally increased after reversion to sinus rhythm by verapamil.     

Transesophageal study of recurrent atrial tachycardia after atrial baffle procedures for complete transposition of the great arteries

Transesophageal study was used for diagnosis and treatment of 51 episodes of tachycardia in 13 patients with complete transposition of the great arteries who had undergone atrial baffle procedure. At the time of atrial baffle procedure, patients were 6 to 36 months old (mean 23). Tachycardia (1 to 17 episodes per patient) first occurred 1 to 23 days (4 patients) or 1.8 to 12 years (9 patients) after atrial baffle. Transesophageal study was performed using a bipolar silicone rubber-coated catheter. Tachycardia conversion was accomplished with stimulation bursts using 4 to 10 stimuli 9.9 ms in duration at 20 to 28 mA and an interstimulus interval of 50 to 100 ms less than the atrial cycle length. All tachycardia episodes had regular atrial cycle lengths ranging from 200 to 350 ms. In 12 patients, second-degree atrioventricular (AV) block was observed during tachycardia, suggesting primary atrial tachycardia. However, in 1 patient, occurrence of AV block always resulted in tachycardia termination, suggesting the presence of AV reentrant tachycardia. Transesophageal stimulation converted 48 of 51 tachycardia episodes to sinus/junctional rhythm. Ten tachycardia episodes in 6 patients were transiently converted to atrial fibrillation lasting 3 seconds to 28 minutes before spontaneous conversion to sinus junctional rhythm. Conversion attempts were unsuccessful on 3 occasions. Acceleration of ventricular rate after stimulation necessitated DC cardioversion on 1 occasion. Conversion was not achieved in 2 tachycardia episodes using stimuli less than 10 mA. Transesophageal study is a safe and effective minimally invasive technique for diagnosis and treatment of tachycardia in infants and children who have had atrial baffle for transposition of the great arteries.     

Persistent Atrial Flutter in Patients Treated for Atrial Fibrillation with Amiodarone and Propafenone:

INTRODUCTION: Antiarrhythmic drugs have been reported to promote the conversion of atrial fibrillation to atrial flutter in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. However, information about the electrophysiologic mechanism and response to radiofrequency ablation of these drug-induced atrial flutters is limited. Furthermore, the determinants of the development of persistent atrial flutter in patients treated for atrial fibrillation with antiarrhythmic drugs are still unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the 136 patients treated for atrial fibrillation with amiodarone (n = 96) or propafenone (n = 40), 15 (11%, mean age 65.5 +/- 12.3 years) were identified to have subsequent development of persistent atrial flutter based on surface ECG characteristics during antiarrhythmic drug treatment. The mean interval between the beginning of drug treatment and the onset of atrial flutter was 5.0 +/- 5.5 months. Intracardiac mapping and entrainment studies revealed that 11 patients had counterclockwise typical atrial flutter, and 4 had clockwise typical atrial flutter. All 15 patients underwent successful ablation with creation of complete bidirectional isthmus conduction block. After a mean follow-up of 12.3 +/- 4.2 months, 14 (93%) of 15 patients who underwent successful ablation and continued taking antiarrhythmic drugs have remained in sinus rhythm. Univariate analysis of clinical variables demonstrated that only atrial enlargement was significantly related to the occurrence of persistent atrial flutter. CONCLUSION: In patients with atrial fibrillation, persistent typical atrial flutter might occur during antiarrhythmic drug treatment, and atrial enlargement was a risk factor for the development of such an arrhythmia. Radiofrequency ablation and continuation of pharmacologic therapy offered a safe and effective means of achieving and maintaining sinus rhythm.     

Catheter ablation of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Antiarrhythmic drug treatment for atrial fibrillation can cause atrial flutter-like arrhythmias. The aim of this study was to clarify the effect of catheter ablation of the tricuspid annulus-vena cava inferior isthmus on amiodarone-induced atrial flutter and to determine the incidence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation of amiodarone-induced atrial flutter in comparison to regular typical flutter. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 92 consecutive patients with typical atrial flutter who underwent isthmus ablation 28 patients had atrial flutter without a history of previous atrial fibrillation (group I), 10 patients had atrial flutter following the initiation of amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (group II) and 54 patients had atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation (group III). Atrial cycle length during atrial flutter in amiodarone-treated patients (group II) (277+/-24 ms) was significantly longer as compared to the cycle length of atrial flutter in group I (247+/-33 ms) and group III patients (235+/-28 ms). The rate of successful transient entrainment and overdrive stimulation to sinus rhythm was not different between patients with (60%) or without amiodarone therapy (group I: 71%, group III: 53%). Successful isthmus ablation with bidirectional conduction block eliminating right atrial flutter was achieved in 90% of amiodarone-treated patients and 93% of patients without amiodarone therapy. In the amiodarone-treated patient group atrial conduction times during pacing in sinus rhythm were significantly prolonged by 20-30% before and after ablation in all regions of the reentrant circuit. During a mean follow-up of 8+/-3 months post-ablation, atrial fibrillation recurred in two of 10 patients on continued amiodarone therapy after successful isthmus ablation. Thus, successful catheter ablation of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy was associated with a markedly lower recurrence rate of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (20%) as compared to patients with atrial flutter plus preexisting paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (76%) and was similar to the outcome of patients with successful atrial flutter ablation without preexisting atrial fibrillation (25%). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that isthmus ablation with bidirectional block and continuation of amiodarone therapy is an effective therapy for the treatment of atrial flutter due to amiodarone therapy for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.     

Subcostal M-mode echocardiography of the right atrial wall in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias

The M-mode echocardiogram of the right atrial (RA) wall can be easily recorded in each person from the subcostal location. In a normal RA wall motion pattern, atrial contraction is represented by a markedly prominent posterior motion. The presence or absence of atrial contractions in the subcostal RA wall echocardiogram, their amplitude, and their timing may help in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias with the simultaneously recorded non-diagnostic electrocardiogram. Flat and hidden P waves can be accurately identified throughout the cardiac cycle. It is possible to distinguish between atrial, ventricular, and nodal premature beats and to recognize atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, paroxysmal atrial tachycardia, paroxysmal atrial tachycardia with block, atrioventricular (AV) nodal tachycardia, and supraventricular tachycardias with aberrant ventricular conduction. The diagnosis of wandering pacemaker, AV dissociation, sinoatrial block, and AV block is facilitated. On the basis of study of 60 patients with various rhythm disturbances, it was concluded that analysis of the subcostal RA wall echocardiogram is a new, helpful noninvasive approach in the diagnosis of cardiac arrhythmias.     

Comparison of first- and second-generation leadless pacemakers in patients with sinus rhythm and complete atrioventricular block

Introduction

The efficacy and safety of leadless cardiac pacemakers (LPMs) as an alternative to conventional transvenous cardiac pacing have been largely reported. The first generation of the Micra^TM transcatheter pacing system (VR; Medtronic) was able to provide single-chamber VVI(R) pacing mode only, with a potential risk of pacemaker syndrome in sinus rhythm patients. A second-generation system (AV) now provides atrioventricular synchrony through atrial mechanical (Am) sensing capability (VDD mode).

Objective

We sought to compare VR and AV systems in sinus rhythm patients with chronic ventricular pacing (Vp) for complete atrioventricular block.

Methods

All consecutive patients implanted with an LPM in our department for complete atrioventricular block were retrospectively screened. Patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus dysfunction, or Vp burden <20% at 1 month postimplantation were excluded. Patients were systematically followed with a visit at 1 month, and then at least once a year.

Results

A total of 93 patients—45 VR (2015–2020) and 48 AV (2020–2021)—were included. VR and AV patients had similar baseline characteristics, except for VR patients being older (80 ± 8 vs. 77 ± 9 years, p = 0.049). The mean Vp burden was 77% in the VR and 82% in the AV group (p = 0.38). In AV patients, the median AV synchronous beats rate was 78%, with 65% having a >66% rate. An E/A ratio <1.2 as measured on echocardiography was the only independent predictor of accurate atrial mechanical tracking (p = 0.01). One-year survival rate was similar in both groups. Five patients in the VR and 0 in the AV group eventually developed pacemaker syndrome within 1 year post-implantation (p = 0.02).

Conclusion

In sinus rhythm patients with chronic Vp for complete atrioventricular block implanted with an LPM, the atrial mechanical sensing algorithm allowed significant atrioventricular synchrony in most patients and was associated with no occurrence of—otherwise rare—pacemaker syndrome.     

Cardiac arrhythmias and conduction disturbances in autoimmune rheumatic diseases

Rhythm and conduction disturbances and sudden cardiac death (SCD) are important manifestations of cardiac involvement in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). In patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a major cause of SCD is atherosclerotic coronary artery disease, leading to acute coronary syndrome and ventricular arrhythmias. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sinus tachycardia, atrial fibrillation and atrial ectopic beats are the major cardiac arrhythmias. In some cases, sinus tachycardia may be the only manifestation of cardiac involvement. The most frequent cardiac rhythm disturbances in systemic sclerosis (SSc) are premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), often appearing as monomorphic, single PVCs, or rarely as bigeminy, trigeminy or pairs. Transient atrial fibrillation, flutter or paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia are also described in 20-30% of SSc patients. Non-sustained ventricular tachycardia was described in 7-13%, while SCD is reported in 5-21% of unselected patients with SSc. The conduction disorders are more frequent in ARD than the cardiac arrhythmias. In RA, infiltration of the atrioventricular (AV) node can cause right bundle branch block in 35% of patients. AV block is rare in RA, and is usually complete. In SLE small vessel vasculitis, the infiltration of the sinus or AV nodes, or active myocarditis can lead to first-degree AV block in 34-70% of patients. In contrast to RA, conduction abnormalities may regress when the underlying disease is controlled. In neonatal lupus, 3% of infants whose mothers are antibody positive develop complete heart block. Conduction disturbances in SSc are due to fibrosis of sinoatrial node, presenting as abnormal ECG, bundle and fascicular blocks and occur in 25-75% of patients.     

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of common atrial flutter--acute and follow-up results

Atrial flutter with a structurally well-defined macro-reentrant circuit in the right atrium has recently become amenable to radiofrequency ablation with the recognition of isthmus as a narrow zone of slow conduction. This study describes 20 consecutive and symptomatic patients with atrial flutter (15 males, 5 females; mean age 38.5 +/- 10.2 years) who underwent radiofrequency ablation in our institute in the last 18 months. Fourteen patients had structurally normal hearts, while the remaining six patients had specific disorders (prior surgery for closure of atrial septal defect-2, idiopathic restrictive cardiomyopathy-1, primary sinus node dysfunction-2, tachycardiomyopathy-1). The endpoints of a complete isthmus block and conversion to sinus rhythm were achieved in 19 of the 20 patients. Total number of pulses needed to attain the endpoints was a mean of 4.2 (range 1-5), each pulse being delivered for 90 seconds. At a mean follow up of 9.4 +/- 3.2 months (range 6-12 months), recurrence of atrial flutter was seen in one patient, atrial fibrillation in two and sinus node reentrant tachycardia in one. These results are comparable to those reported in the literature. Achievement of a complete isthmus block appears to be an important endpoint in obtaining optimal results. The issues of alternative sites of ablation, long-term results and advantages of an 8 mm tip catheter need to be examined further. In conclusion, radiofrequency ablation appears to be the preferred mode of treatment for patients with atrial flutter with excellent short-term and mid-term results.     

Tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (so-called "sick sinus syndrome"). Pathology, mechanisms and treatment

The tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome consists of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, flutter or tachycardia followed by sinoatrial block or sinus arrest resulting in Stokes-Adams attacks. Detailed histologie findings of the conduction system of 2 patients with this entity correlated well with the clinical observation of cardiac rhythm disturbances in the sinus node, atria and atrioventricular (A-V) junction. Eight other patients with the syndrome were studied clinically. The mechanisms (as revealed by the electrocardiogram) producing the bradycardia phase include depression of pacemaker function (arrest) or of conduction (exit block) of the sinus impulse, or both, plus depression of A-V junctional impulse formation. Proper therapy usually requires electrical pacing in conjunction with administration of digitalis or propranolol, or both. Our findings suggest that the term “sick sinus syndrome” is an inaccurate and inappropriate synonym for the tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome.