Accidental dural puncture,postdural puncture headache,intrathecal catheters,and epidural blood patch: revisiting the old nemesis

One of the controversial management options for accidental dural puncture in pregnant patients is the conversion of labor epidural analgesia to continuous spinal analgesia by threading the epidural catheter intrathecally. No clear consensus exists on how to best prevent severe headache from occurring after accidental dural puncture. To investigate whether the intrathecal placement of an epidural catheter following accidental dural puncture impacts the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and the subsequent need for an epidural blood patch in parturients. A retrospective chart review of accidental dural puncture was performed at Hutzel Women’s Hospital in Detroit, MI, USA for the years 2002–2010. Documented cases of accidental dural punctures (N = 238) were distributed into two groups based on their management: an intrathecal catheter (ITC) group in which the epidural catheter was inserted intrathecally and a non-intrathecal catheter (non-ITC) group that received the epidural catheter inserted at different levels of lumbar interspaces. The incidence of PDPH as well as the necessity for epidural blood patch was analyzed using two-tailed Fisher’s exact test. In the non-ITC group, 99 (54 %) parturients developed PDPH in comparison to 20 (37 %) in the ITC [odds ratio (OR), 1.98; 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.06–3.69; P = 0.03]. Fifty-seven (31 %) of 182 patients in the non-ITC group required an epidural blood patch (EBP) (data for 2 patients of 184 were missing). In contrast, 7 (13 %) of parturients in the ITC group required an EBP. The incidence of EBP was calculated in parturients who actually developed headache to be 57 of 99 (57 %) in the non-ITC group versus 7 of 20 (35 %) in the ITC group (OR, 2.52; 95 % CI, 0.92–6.68; P = 0.07). The insertion of an intrathecal catheter following accidental dural puncture decreases the incidence of PDPH but not the need for epidural blood patch in parturients.     

Second stage pushing correlates with headache after unintentional dural puncture in parturients

PURPOSE: To determine the association between bearing down, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) and epidural blood patch (EBP) following single 17 gauge unintentional dural puncture (UDP) in parturients. METHODS: The charts of 60 parturients identified with UDP in our institutional database during epidural placement were independently reviewed. Patients were divided into categories based on the anesthetic record: well-documented single punctures; well-documented multiple punctures; catheter-related puncture; unclear category (not clear if more than one puncture occurred or if dural puncture had occurred at all) and no evidence of dural puncture. Patients with single 17 gauge punctures were divided into those who had pushed (Group 1) and those who had not (Group 2). Group 2 patients had undergone Cesarean section before reaching second stage labour. The incidence of PDPH, EBP, and cumulative duration to delivery after UDP were compared between groups. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients with well-documented single punctures were identified: 23 had engaged in active pushing as part of second stage labour (Group 1); 10 had not (Group 2). Seventy-four percent of Group1I developed PDPH compared with 10% in Group 2 (P < 0.002). Fifty-seven percent of Group 1 received an EBP compared with 0% in Group 2 (P < 0.002). Increasing the duration of pushing was associated with an increasing incidence of PDPH; the majority of women who pushed > 30 min developed headache. CONCLUSIONS: An increased incidence of PDPH and EBP after UDP occurs in women bearing down in 2nd stage labour when compared with those who never pushed. There was also an association between the cumulative duration of bearing down and the incidence of PDPH.     

Decreased incidence of headache after unintentional dural puncture in patients with cesarean delivery administered with postoperative epidural analgesia

Purpose  To investigate how subsequent placement of a catheter into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h affected the incidence of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). Methods  The records of 52 parturients who had had accidental dural puncture in cesarean delivery were reviewed. The parturients were assigned to two groups. Twenty-eight parturients were assigned to the study group, in whom an epidural catheter was inserted and was used for anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Twenty-four parturients were assigned to the control group, in whom spinal anesthesia (n = 20) or general anesthesia (n = 4) was applied. For postoperative analgesia in patients with incision pain above visual analog scale (VAS) 3, 3 mg morphine in 15 ml saline was administered through the epidural catheter in the study group, while intramuscular meperidine or tramadol was administered in the control group. Once PDPH was observed, conservative treatment was tried first. If the headache persisted despite conservative treatment, an epidural blood patch was applied through the catheter or a reinserted epidural needle. Results  The study group demonstrated significant reduction of the incidence of PDPH and reduction in the indication for an epidural blood patch compared to the control group (7.1% vs 58% [P = 0.000] and 3.6% vs 37.5% [P = 0.002], respectively). Conclusion  Subsequent catheter placement into the epidural space after unintentional dural puncture in cesarean delivery and leaving the catheter for postoperative analgesia for 36–72 h may reduce the incidence of PDPH.     

Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a common and debilitating complication of central neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after accidental dural puncture (ADP) during labour epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. Initial treatment of PDPH includes adequate hydration and analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment. It is more successful if performed over 24–48 hours after the development of symptoms. Complete and permanent relief of symptoms following a single EBP occurs in up to one third of cases where headache follows ADP with an epidural needle. Complete or partial relief may be seen in 50–80% overall. Higher success rates are achieved following a second EBP. There is now UK national guidance on the treatment of post dural puncture headache published by the Obstetric Anaesthetists Association (OAA).     

Prevention of post‐dural puncture headache in parturients: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Post‐dural puncture headaches (PDPHs) present an important clinical problem. We assessed methods to decrease accidental dural punctures (ADPs) and interventions to reduce PDPH following ADP. Multiple electronic databases were searched for randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of parturients having labour epidurals, in which the studied intervention could plausibly affect ADP or PDPH, and the incidence of at least one of these was recorded. Forty RCTs (n = 11,536 epidural insertions) were included, studying combined spinal–epidurals (CSEs), loss of resistance medium, prophylactic epidural blood patches, needle bevel orientation, ultrasound‐guided insertion, epidural morphine, Special Sprotte needles, acoustic‐guided insertion, administration of cosyntropin, and continuous spinal analgesia. The RCTs for CSE, loss of resistance medium, and prophylactic epidural blood patches were meta‐analysed. Five methods reduced PDPH: prophylactic epidural blood patch {four trials, median quality score = 2, risk difference = ?0.48 [95% confidence interval (CI): ?0.88 to ?0.086]}, lateral positioning of the epidural needle bevel upon insertion (one trial, quality score = 1), Special Sprotte needles [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.44 (95% CI: ?0.67 to ?0.21)], epidural morphine [one trial, quality score = 4, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.59 to ?0.13)], and cosyntropin [one trial, quality score = 5, risk difference = ?0.36 (95% CI ?0.55 to ?0.16)]. Several methods potentially reduce PDPH. Special Sprotte needles, epidural morphine, and cosyntropin are thus far each supported by a single, albeit good quality trial. Prophylactic blood patches are supported by three trials, but these had flawed methodology. Mostly, trials were of limited quality, and further well‐conducted, large studies are needed.     

Post-dural puncture headache in the parturient

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is one of the most common and debilitating complications of neuraxial blockade in the parturient. The obstetric population is at particular risk with up to 80% of women developing symptoms after inadvertent dural puncture during epidural insertion. PDPH typically develops 24–48 hours post-puncture and is classically described as an occipito-frontal headache with postural features. Diagnosis and assessment should include consideration of other potential causes of post-partum headache. At the time of inadvertent dural puncture (IDP) one may insert an intrathecal catheter, re-site the epidural or use alternative analgesia. Initial treatment of a PDPH includes bed rest, adequate hydration and simple analgesics. Epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold standard treatment of PDPH.     

Post dural puncture headache following combined spinal epidural or epidural anaesthesia in obstetric patients.

A retrospective review of obstetric anaesthesia charts was performed for all parturients receiving regional anaesthesia over a 22-month period. The incidence of headache, post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and various other complications of regional anaesthesia that had been prospectively assessed were noted, as was the anaesthetic technique used (epidural or combined spinal epidural (CSE)). PDPH was rare (0.44%) and occurred with similar frequency in those managed with either epidural or CSE anaesthesia or analgesia. The pencil-point spinal needle gauge (27 or 29) did not influence the incidence of PDPH. Following a CSE technique, the epidural catheter more reliably produced effective analgesia/anaesthesia as compared with a standard epidural technique (1.49% versus 3.18% incidence of replaced catheters respectively). We conclude, based on the results of this retrospective review, that CSE is acceptable with respect to the occurrence of PDPH and that it is possible it is advantageous in relation to the correct placement of the epidural catheter     

Decreased incidence of headache after accidental dural puncture in caesarean delivery patients receiving continuous postoperative intrathecal analgesia

To examine the effects of prolonged (> 24 h) intrathecal catheterization with the use of postoperative analgesia on the incidence of post–dural puncture headache (PDPH), charts of 45 obstetric patients who had accidental dural puncture following attempts at epidural block were reviewed retrospectively. Three groups were identified: Group I (n = 15) patients had a dural puncture on the first attempt at epidural block, but successful epidural block on a repeated attempt; Group II (n=17) patients had a dural puncture with immediate conversion to continuous spinal anaesthesia with catheterization lasting only for the duration of caesarean delivery; Group III (n= 13) patients had an immediate conversion to spinal anaesthesia and received post–caesarean section continuous intrathecal patient–controlled analgesia consisting of fentanyl 5 (ig'ml^-1 with bupivacaine 0.25 mg·ml^-1 and epinephrine 2 μg·ml^-1 with catheterization lasting >24 h. No parturient in group III developed a PDPH. This was substantially lower ( P < 0.009) than the 33% incidence for group I and the 47% incidence for group II. The incidence of a PDPH did not differ between group I and II. Similarly, there was no difference between group I and II with regard to requests for a blood patch. Patients receiving continuous intrathecal analgesia had excellent pain relief, could easily ambulate and none complained of pruritus, nausea, vomiting, sensory loss or weakness. In conclusion, indwelling spinal catheterization > 24 h with continuous intrathecal analgesia following accidental dural puncture in parturients may for some patients be a suitable method for providing PDPH prophylaxis and postoperative analgesia.     

Dural puncture in obstetric analgesia. Epidemiologic features and therapeutic management]

OBJECTIVE: To assess the time of occurrence, circumstances and presenting symptoms of unintentional dural puncture (UDP), the location and intensity of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH), and the efficacy of their treatment by epidural blood-patch (EBP). STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. PATIENTS: Cases of UDP recorded over a 4-year period in an obstetric anaesthesia unit. METHODS: The following variables were studied: maternal age, weight and height, hour of occurrence and number of puncture attempts, existence of reflux of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the needle, experience of the practitioners, subsequent modalities of obstetrical analgesia, frequency of occurrence, clinical characteristics and therapeutic management of PDPH. In case of EBP, the amount of blood and the efficacy of the procedure were also recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients presented with UDP (0.66%). No reflux of CSF was identified in nine cases. Most UDP occurred at the first or second attempt, usually when performed by a practitioner poorly trained in epidural analgesia in obstetrics. The risk of UDP was higher during night-time work (risk ratio: 3.0; 95% confidence interval: 1.1-8.0; p = 0.04). Subsequent analgesia was provided via the epidural route in 19 cases, subarachnoidal route in one, and intravenous route in one case. PDPH did not develop in two patients. Three patients were given prophylactic EPB, and 16 received curative EBP. A second EBP was required 24 h later in seven patients. One patient developed meralgia paresthetica following EBP. CONCLUSION: In parturients, UDP usually results in PDPH. A rapid and effective treatment is required, mainly EBP. Another EBP is eventually necessary in some patients.     

Intrathecal catheter insertion during labour reduces the risk of postdural puncture headache

Purpose

To describe the anaesthetic management and report the incidence of PDPH in three parturients who had experienced accidental durai puncture during labour and the subsequent deliberate intrathecal insertion of an epidural catheter.

Clinical features

Inadvertent durai puncture with a 16-gauge Tuohy needle occurred during the first stage of labour at 3–4 cm cervical dilatation in all three women. The 20-gauge epidural catheter was immediately inserted into the subarachnoid space after accidental durai penetration. Intermittent intrathecal injections of lidocaine or bupivacaine with fentanyl were administered to provide analgesia during labour and delivery. Two of the women had spontaneous vaginal deliveries, whereas Caesarean section was performed in one case due to acute fetal distress during the second stage of labour. The intrathecal catheter was left in-situ for 13–19 hr after delivery and the women were questioned daily for symptoms of PDPH. None of the three women developed PDPH after dural puncture and intrathecal catheterisation with the epidural catheter.

Conclusion

Immediate intrathecal insertion of the epidural catheter after accidental durai puncture during labour proved to be an effective prophylactic technique to prevent PDPH in these three parturients.     

The effect of epidural needle type on postdural puncture headache: a randomized trial

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized trial in labouring parturients was undertaken to assess whether the 18G Special Sprotte epidural needle is associated with a lower incidence of accidental dural puncture (ADP) in comparison with the 17G Tuohy needle. A secondary purpose was to determine if the incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH ) differed between groups when ADP occurred. METHODS: Following Institutional Review Board approval 1,077 parturients requesting epidural analgesia at three tertiary obstetrical units were randomized to epidural catheter insertion with a 17G Tuohy or 18G Special Sprotte needle. Patients were followed for seven days by a blinded assessor to determine the occurrence of PDPH using standardized criteria. If postural headache or neck ache presented, an ADP was diagnosed even if cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was not observed at insertion. This subgroup was followed daily to assess headache characteristics and response to blood patch. RESULTS: Six Tuohy group patients, and two patients in the Sprotte group were excluded. One of the six excluded in the Tuohy group had an ADP. Twenty-eight ADPs occurred, nine unrecognized by CSF visualization (1.8% Tuohy, 3.4% Sprotte, P = 0.12). The incidence of unrecognized ADPs was higher in the Sprotte group (40% Sprotte vs 20% Tuohy, P < 0.05). If ADP occurred, the incidence of PDPH was lower in the Sprotte group (100% Tuohy vs 55% Sprotte, P = 0.025). The ease of use, and user satisfaction were higher in the Tuohy group (84 +/- 17.3% Tuohy vs 68.2 +/- 25.3% Sprotte, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence of ADP was not reduced with the Special Sprotte epidural needle in comparison with the Tuohy needle, but PDPH after ADP occurred less frequently in the Sprotte group.     

Efficacy of a prophylactic epidural blood patch in preventing post dural puncture headache in parturients after inadvertent dural puncture

BACKGROUND: Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occurs in up to 80% of parturients who experience inadvertent dural puncture during epidural catheter placement. The authors performed a randomized double blind study to assess the effect of prophylactic epidural blood patch on the incidence of PDPH and the need for therapeutic epidural blood patch. METHODS: Sixty-four parturients who incurred inadvertent dural puncture were randomized to receive a prophylactic epidural blood patch with 20 ml autologous blood (prophylactic epidural blood patch group) or a sham patch (sham group). Subjects were evaluated daily for development of PDPH for a minimum of 5 days after dural puncture. Those who developed a PDPH were followed daily for a minimum of 3 days after resolution of the headache. Subjects with moderate headaches who reported difficulties performing childcare activities and all those with severe headaches were advised to receive a therapeutic epidural blood patch. RESULTS: Eighteen of 32 subjects in each group (56%) developed PDPH. Therapeutic blood patch was recommended in similar numbers of patients in each group. The groups had similar onset time of PDPH, median peak pain scores, and number of days spent unable to perform childcare activities as a result of postural headache. The median duration of PDPH, however, was shorter in the prophylactic epidural blood patch group. CONCLUSIONS: A decrease in the incidence of PDPH or the need for criteria-directed therapeutic epidural patch was not detected when a prophylactic epidural blood patch was administered to parturients after inadvertent dural puncture. However, prophylactic epidural blood patch did shorten the duration of PDPH symptoms.     

Decrease in the incidence of post-dural puncture headache: maintaining CSF volume

The incidence of epidural needle-induced post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients following dural puncture with a large bore (18-gauge) needle has been reported to range 76-85%. We describe seven cases in which the performance of epidural anesthesia in parturients was complicated by an unintentional dural puncture with an 18-gauge epidural needle. In all seven cases, the unintentional dural puncture was followed by (i) injection of the CSF in the glass syringe back into the subarachnoid space through the epidural needle, (ii) insertion of a epidural catheter into the subarachnoid space (now referred to as an intrathecal catheter), (iii) injection of a small amount of preservative free saline (3-5 ml) into the subarachnoid space through the intrathecal catheter, (iv) administration of bolus and then continuous intrathecal labor analgesia through the intrathecal catheter and then (v) leaving the intrathecal catheter in-situ for a total of 12-20 h. PDPH occurred in only one of these cases (14%).     

Expectant management of postdural puncture headache increases hospital length of stay and emergency room visits

PURPOSE: This retrospective cohort study examined hospital length of stay (LOS) and emergency room (ER) visits in parturients diagnosed with postdural puncture headache (PDPH) following recognized dural puncture (DP). All cases were managed expectantly. Outcomes were compared with matched controls with uneventful labour epidurals. METHODS: After Ethics Committee approval, the hospital perinatal database was used to identify healthy parturients with recognized DP during labour epidural placement from 1996-2001. Women developing PDPH after expectant management were matched with women with uneventful epidurals and no evidence of PDPH, as well as by parity, delivery mode and admission date. All women delivered term singletons. The primary outcome was LOS (hours) from delivery to discharge. Secondary outcomes included: number (#) nights in hospital, #ER visits for PDPH, epidural blood patch (EBP) timing (pre vs post discharge), EBP location (ward vs ER) and blood volumes used. RESULTS: 26 cases and 26 controls were identified. Precise discharge times were found for 23 cases and 23 controls. In cases, the LOS was increased by a mean of 17 +/- 23.8 (SD) hours; [95% conficence interval (CI) = 8, 26; P = 0.0012] and # nights in hospital was increased by a mean of 0.62 +/- 0.94 nights (95% CI, 0.26, 0.98, P = 0.0027). Nineteen cases (73% 19/26) received at least one EBP. Sixteen cases received at least one EBP prior to discharge with 38% (6/16) returning to ER for re-assessment/repeat EBP. Forty-four percent (4/9) of cases without an EBP prior to discharge returned to ER for further assessment/EBP. CONCLUSION: PDPH leads to a significant increase in hospital LOS and ER visits. Studies of preventive therapy are warranted.     

Intracranial subdural hematoma following dural puncture in a parturient with HELLP syndrome

PURPOSE: To present a case of postpartum bilateral intracranial subdural hematoma after dural puncture during attempted epidural analgesia for labour. CLINICAL FEATURES: This complication occurred following accidental dural puncture in a parturient with thrombocytopenia (99,000 x microL-1) who subsequently developed the syndrome of hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes and low platelets. On the first postoperative day, postdural puncture headache (PDPH) developed. An epidural blood patch (EBP) was deferred to the third postoperative day because of a platelet count of 21,000 x micro L-1. However, the headache intensified from a typical PDPH to one which was not posturally related. A second EBP was abandoned after the injection of 5 mL of blood because of increasing headache during the procedure. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral temporal subdural hematomas. The patient was managed conservatively and discharged home without any sequelae. CONCLUSION: It is conceivable that thrombocytopenia together with possible abnormal platelet function increased the risk of subdural hematoma. Alternative diagnoses to PDPH should be considered whenever headache is not posturally related.     

High quality labour analgesia using small gauge epidural needles and catheters

PURPOSE: Inadvertent epidural needle punctures represent the leading cause of severe postdural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients. Use of small gauge (G) epidural needles for continuous analgesia has received little attention despite possible important reductions in PDPH. We report the first study to examine the feasibility of using small G Tuohy needles and 23 G catheters for labour analgesia. METHODS: Healthy parturients 30 min), recognized dural puncture, PDPH, patient assessment of analgesia within 24 hr of delivery, complications and anesthesiologist satisfaction. RESULTS: Twenty-seven parturients were recruited. Successful blocks were initiated and maintained in 24/27 who rated overall analgesia from good to excellent (19/24 very good to excellent). Three block failures occurred at the initiation phase only (two unilateral, one absent). There was no evidence of catheter kinking after placement. One patient developed PDPH after unrecognized dural puncture which was self-treated with acetaminophen for four days, followed by complete symptom resolution. CONCLUSION: It is feasible to provide high quality labour analgesia using small G epidural needles and catheters. The effect of small G epidural needles on PDPH warrants future study.     

Postpartum headaches: summary report of the National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database (NOAD) 1999

The National Obstetric Anaesthetic Database was established in 1998 to support collection of national data on obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia. The first year's project aimed to determine the incidence, characteristics, contributing factors and management of postpartum headaches with anaesthetic interventions. A total of 65348 women were reported to have had anaesthetic interventions. There were individual records of 404 women in whom postdural puncture headache (PDPH) was diagnosed (47 mild, 134 moderate, 202 severe and 21 unspecified) and 571 in whom headache was not related to dural puncture (315 mild, 176 moderate, 44 severe and 36 unspecified). Recognised dural puncture occurred in 165 women (41%), 130 (79%) during labour. Placement of spinal catheters on dural puncture in 51 women did not influence headache severity. Abdominal compression used to test the diagnosis of PDPH was only positive in 56/186 parturients (30%). Epidural blood patch was performed in 240 women with PDPH, of whom 101 women (42%) received their first blood patch within two days of delivery. The incidence of headache ranged from 1.1% to 1.9% between all anaesthetic techniques but increased to 11% for women receiving multiple regional anaesthetics. The predominant characteristics of PDPH were limitation of daily activity (n=305, 75%), severity (moderate/severe) and a postural element (n = 325, 80%), all significantly different from headache from other causes (P = 0.001). Shoulder/neck stiffness (n=172, 43%) was the commonest symptom associated with PDPH.     

Accidental dural puncture: Combination of prophylactic methods to avoid post-dural puncture headache

Accidental dural puncture (ADP) is a common complication of epidural catheter insertion, and may lead to post-dural puncture headache (PDPH), especially in obstetric patients. Epidural blood patch (BP) is the most effective treatment of PDPH. Prophylactic BP has shown its efficacy to prevent PDPH; nevertheless, this method may be insufficient. We report an ADP case before induction of labor in a 28-year-old parturient. To avoid PDPH, an intrathecal catheter was immediately inserted after ADP and an epidural catheter was also inserted at the interspace above. Catheters were kept in place for more than 24 hours. A prophylactic BP was performed immediately after removal of the intrathecal catheter. The patient did not experience any headache. This combination of treatments (intrathecal catheter insertion + prophylactic BP) may be a good alternative approach to prevent PDPH, even if it has to be warranted by other clinical studies.