Clinical evaluation of the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan for HCV RNA quantitation in comparison with the branched-DNA assay

Diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection relies on sensitive and accurate HCV RNA detection and quantitation. The performance of the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan 48 (CAP/CTM) (Roche, Branchburg, NJ), a fully automated, real-time PCR HCV RNA quantitative test was assessed and compared with the branched-DNA (bDNA) assay. Clinical evaluation on 576 specimens obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis C showed a good correlation (r = 0.893) between the two test, but the CAP/CTM scored higher HCV RNA titers than the bDNA across all viral genotypes. The mean bDNA versus CAP/CTM log10 IU/ml differences were -0.49, -0.4, -0.54, -0.26 for genotype 1a, 1b, 2a/2c, 3a, and 4, respectively. These differences reached statistical significance for genotypes 1b, 2a/c, and 3a. The ability of the CAP/CTM to monitor patients undergoing antiviral therapy and correctly identify the weeks 4 and 12 rapid and early virological responses was confirmed. The broader dynamic range of the CAP/CTM compared with the bDNA allowed for a better definition of viral kinetics. In conclusion, the CAP/CTM appears as a reliable and user-friendly assay to monitor HCV viremia during treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis. Its high sensitivity and wide dynamic range may help a better definition of viral load changes during antiviral therapy.     

Fully automated quantification of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in human plasma and human serum by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan system.

BACKGROUND: HCV RNA is commonly recognized as key parameter for reliable diagnosis and treatment monitoring of HCV infection. Determination of blood HCV RNA concentrations reduces the pre-seroconversion period in the diagnosis of HCV infection and supports management of interferon alpha-based therapies of chronic HCV infection. OBJECTIVES AND STUDY DESIGN: The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test combines automated extraction of nucleic acids on the COBAS AmpliPrep Instrument with real-time PCR on the COBAS TaqMan Analyzer, thus greatly reducing hands-on time during sample preparation and amplification/detection. The test, which is calibrated to the 1st International HCV WHO Standard, was evaluated for sensitivity, dynamic range, precision, matrix equivalence, genotype inclusivity, interfering substances, diagnostic and analytical specificity, as well as for correlation with two other commercial tests for HCV RNA quantification. RESULTS: The COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test demonstrated a >6-log dynamic range of 43-6.90 E+7 IU/mL, a sensitivity (95% hit rate) of at least 15 IU/mL for HCV WHO Standard and a comparable quantification of genotypes 1-6. HCV quantification results were in good correlation with those obtained by the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test v2.0 and the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 test. CONCLUSIONS: The fully automated COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test excellently accomplishes the requirements for highly sensitive detection and reliable quantification of HCV in clinical samples and thus improves therapy monitoring and management of HCV infection.     

Evaluation of an automated, highly sensitive, real-time PCR-based assay (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark) for quantification of HCV RNA

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and its therapy is based on qualitative and quantitative measurement of HCV RNA. OBJECTIVES: A new assay that employs automated specimen extraction and real-time RT-PCR (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark, "CAP/CTM", Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, USA) was designed for linear quantification and highly sensitive detection of HCV RNA. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of CAP/CTM were compared to standard RT-PCR-based COBAS Amplicor Monitor 2.0 (CAM) assay in a multicenter study. RESULTS: The limit of detection of CAP/CTM was 7.4IU/ml (95% CI 6.2-10.6) and clinical specificity was 99%. The linear range of HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM was between 28 and 1.4x10(7)IU/ml, with a correlation coefficient between expected and observed results of >0.99. A fivefold dilution of serum- or plasma-samples showed a linear correlation of HCV RNA levels in undiluted and diluted samples. Analyses of the mean intra- and inter-assay imprecision within the linear range of quantification showed a coefficient of variation of 3% and 3%, respectively. HCV genotypes 1a/b, 2b, 3a, 4, 5 and 6 were equally quantified by the CAP/CTM and CAM assay with mean deviations ranging from -0.29log(10) to 0.32log(10)IU/ml. HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM and CAM was highly concordant (correlation coefficient of 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP/CTM assay is a reliable and robust assay for highly sensitive detection and quantification of HCV RNA within a broad linear range.     

Assessment of viral loads in patients with chronic hepatitis C with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0, COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0, and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays

The correlation between response to antiviral therapy and pretreatment viral load in patients with chronic hepatitis C has prompted the development of quantitative assays to measure viral load. The aim of our study was to assess the clinical relevance of the newly developed semiautomated PCR system COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 in comparison with (i) the AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 assay, which underestimates RNA concentration of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 2 to 6, and (ii) the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assay, which achieves equivalent quantification for each HCV genotype, with samples from 174 patients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C before therapy. The level and range of quantification measured with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 were 1 log lower than when measured with the COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0, at 0.261 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.001 x 10(6) to 2.50 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml) and 4.032 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.026 x 10(6) to 72.6 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml), respectively. The two assays showed a poor correlation (r(2) = 0.175). The level and range of quantification were similar when measured with the COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays, at 3.03 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml (range, 0.023 x 10(6) to 72.6 x 10(6) RNA copies/ml) and 4.91 Meq/ml (range, 0.200 to 49.5 Meq/ml), respectively. The two assays showed a strong correlation (r(2) = 0. 686) for each HCV genotype. The duration of treatment (6 or 12 months) is modulated according to HCV genotype and viral load. Our results indicate that COBAS HCV MONITOR version 2.0 and QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA version 2.0 assays showing an equal dynamic range for each HCV genotype are suitable tools to assess patients before therapy.     

Quantitation of HCV RNA with the microwell plate and COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor assays.

BACKGROUND: We performed the Roche Amplicor Monitor hepatitis C virus (HCV) v2.0 microwell plate (MWP) assay for 2 years prior to bringing a COBAS instrument into the lab. Before reporting any results from the automated COBAS Amplicor Monitor HCV v2.0, we compared quantitative data with results on the same specimens from the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. OBJECTIVE: To determine if the COBAS Amplicor Monitor assay yielded quantitative results that were comparable with those given by the manual Amplicor Monitor HCV. STUDY DESIGN: We tested 145 specimens with both assays. Specimens were chosen on the basis of having fallen within the linear range of the first assay. RESULTS: The log(10) mean (+/-standard deviation) for all 145 specimens was 5.976 (+/-0.597) for the COBAS and 6.142 (+/-0.597) for the MWP assay. When plotted as 145 pairs of numbers (log MWP result vs. log COBAS result), the linear regression line was displaced slightly downward from the line of equivalence by 0.1 log at the lower end and by 0.2 log at the upper end indicating the COBAS result was somewhat lower than the MWP result across the full range of the assay. The mean of the difference of the manual method and the COBAS for all 145 specimens was 0.166 log(10). A subset of 45 specimens for which we had HCV genotype data was analyzed separately. This set of specimens (of which 33 were genotype 1) also showed excellent concordance between the automated and manual methods. The two trendlines, one for genotype 1 and the other for genotypes 2, 3 and 4, were superimposable and thus the quantitative results were apparently not influenced by the genotypes, although the numbers were small (six HCV genotype 2, five HCV genotype 3 and one HCV genotype 4). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the automated Roche COBAS Amplicor Monitor v2.0 yields results that are comparable with the manual Amplicor Monitor assay for HCV genotype 1 and possibly also for genotypes 2, 3 and 4.     

Evaluation of the clinical usefulness of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver2.0): Comparison with AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR assay (ver1.0) and HCV core protein level

The quantitation of serum levels of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA in chronic hepatitis C has been regarded as one of the most important indicators for the outcome of interferon (IFN) therapy. The AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 1.0 (AMPLICOR v1.0) assay is widely used for the evaluation of the HCV level. A new generation assay called the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (COBAS v2.0) assay, which is semiautomated and modified to amplify all genotypes equally, has been developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical relevance of the COBAS v2.0 assay in comparison with the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay and HCV core protein assay in patients with chronic hepatitis C before IFN therapy. HCV RNA was detectable in 230 cases (97.5%) and undetectable in 6 cases (2.5%) by the COBAS v2.0 assay. The RNA levels measured by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay correlated significantly with those measured by the COBAS v2.0 assay, and the sensitivity of the new version 2.0 assay was better than that of version 1.0, especially in serotype 2. In relation to the outcome of IFN therapy, HCV RNA levels from virologically sustained responders by the AMPLICOR v1.0 assay were 82.3 +/- 22.9 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 36.9 +/- 13.4 kcopies/ml in serotype 2, and those from virologically nonsustained responders were 525.2 +/- 48.6 kcopies/ml in serotype 1 and 76.7 +/- 19.5 kcopies/ml in serotype 2.The rates of sustained response to <100 kcopies/ml were 34/63 (54.0%) in serotype 1 and 24/48 (50.0%) in serotype 2. A statistically significant virological response was seen in serotype 1 (P < 0.0001), but not in serotype 2. In contrast, the levels in virologically sustained responders by the COBAS v2.0 assay were 88.2 +/- 20.5 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 136.8 +/- 40.1 KIU/ml in serotype 2, and those in virologically nonsustained responders were 608.8 +/- 48.4 KIU/ml in serotype 1 and 328.3 +/- 62.8 KIU/ml in serotype 2. The rates of sustained response to <100 KIU/ml were 33/60 (55.0%) in serotype 1 and 21/35 (60.0%) in serotype 2. Statistical significance in virological response was seen in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Although the sensitivity of the HCV core protein assay was lower than that with the COBAS v2.0 assay, the HCV core protein levels also correlated well with the results of the COBAS v2.0 assay. The HCV core protein levels of virologically sustained responders were 37.6 +/- 12.0 pg/ml in serotype 1, 81.3 +/- 37.0 pg/ml in serotype 2, and those of virologically nonsustained responders were 289.9 +/- 23.5 pg/ml in serotype 1, 191.4 +/- 32.1 pg/ml in serotype 2. This assay could predict the outcome of IFN therapy in both serotype 1 (P < 0.0001) and serotype 2 (P < 0.05). Thus, both the COBAS v2.0 assay and the HCV core protein assay showed that the viral load was an indicator of virologically sustained response in serotype 2 and in serotype 1.     

Clinical evaluation of the automated COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR test version 2.0 for quantifying serum hepatitis C virus RNA and comparison to the quantiplex HCV version 2.0 test

A second-generation hepatitis C virus (HCV) quantitative assay (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test, version 2.0; COBAS HCM-2) has been developed, with the intention of achieving equivalent quantification of all HCV genotypes and improving assay performance. To evaluate the clinical performance of COBAS HCM-2 and its utility in predicting the response to alpha interferon treatment, sera from 215 chronic hepatitis C patients were analyzed and the results were compared with those obtained by the Quantiplex bDNA HCV RNA, version 2.0, assay (bDNA-2). The COBAS HCM-2 had significantly greater sensitivity than bDNA-2 (94.9 versus 88.4%; P < 0.001) when performed with sera from chronic hepatitis C patients who were viremic by a qualitative PCR test. The standard deviations for the within-run and between-run reproducibilities of COBAS HCM-2 were <0. 1 and <0.2, respectively, and it showed an improved linear range between genotypes with the threefold serial dilutions tested (r(2) = 0.986 to 0.995). The COBAS HCM-2 results were positively correlated with the bDNA-2 results, but the values for COBAS HCM-2 were on average 0.96 log lower than the values for bDNA-2. The mean difference in quantification values between these two assays did not differ among samples with different genotypes (0.70 to 1.00 log). No genotype-dependent difference in viral load was observed. The pretreatment viral load was significantly lower in complete responders. By using multivariate analysis, the viral load 2 weeks after the initiation of alpha interferon treatment was the strongest predictor of a complete response. In conclusion, COBAS HCM-2 demonstrated good sensitivity, linearity, and reproducibility and efficiency equal to that of bDNA-2 for the quantification of HCV genotypes 1 and 2. Hence, this assay provides a rapid and reliable method for the quantification of HCV RNA in serum and is useful for the planning of interferon treatment.     

Evaluation of the COBAS TaqMan HCV test with automated sample processing using the MagNA pure LC instrument

The COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (TaqMan HCV; Roche Molecular Systems Inc., Branchburg, N.J.) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) performed on the COBAS TaqMan 48 Analyzer (Roche Molecular Systems) currently relies on a manual sample processing method. Implementation of an automated sample processing method would facilitate the clinical use of this test. In this study, we evaluated the performance characteristics of TaqMan HCV following automated sample processing by the MagNA Pure LC instrument (MP; Roche Applied Science, Indianapolis, Ind.). The analytical sensitivity of TaqMan HCV following sample processing by MP was 8.1 IU/ml (95% confidence interval, 6.1 to 15.2). The assay showed good linearity (R(2) = 0.99) across a wide range of HCV RNA levels (25 to 5 x 10(6) IU/ml), with coefficients of variation ranging from 10% to 46%. Among 83 clinical specimens, the sensitivity and specificity of TaqMan HCV were 100% and 95%, respectively, when compared to the COBAS AMPLICOR hepatitis C virus test, version 2.0 (COBAS AMPLICOR; Roche Molecular Systems), with TaqMan HCV detecting two more HCV RNA-positive specimens than COBAS AMPLICOR. Both specimens were confirmed to be HCV RNA positive by the VERSANT HCV RNA qualitative test (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, N.Y.). There was also strong correlation (R(2) = 0.95) and good agreement between the results from TaqMan HCV and the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay (bDNA) (Bayer HealthCare LLC) among a group of 93 clinical specimens. The MP is a versatile, labor-saving sample processing platform suitable for reliable performance of TaqMan HCV.     

Detection and quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR after automated sample processing

There is considerable evidence that the loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA during the first 3 months of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a prognostic marker of response to therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for quantifying HCV RNA in plasma or serum are now commercially available. The extraction of HCV RNA can also be automated. This report analyses the performance of the COBAS Ampliprep-COBAS Taqman 48 (CAP/CTM) real-time PCR assay and compares this new test with the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor v 2.0 assay (CAM). CAP/CTM was 100% specific. The assay was linear across a wide range of HCV RNA concentrations without sample dilution. The intra-assay variation was 0.3-3.3% and the interassay variation was 1.5-6.7%. A total of 118 clinical samples with different HCV genotypes were assayed using both methods. The results obtained using the two methods were well correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). The mean difference [CAP/CTM-CAM] was 0.17 log IU/ml and it was not influenced by the HCV genotype or by the subtype. It is concluded that the new CAP/CTM system is adequate for quantifying HCV RNA in clinical practice.     

Evaluation of the invader assay for genotyping hepatitis C virus

The Invader 1.0 assay (Invader HCV Genotyping Assay, version 1.0; Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, WI) has been developed for the rapid differentiation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotypes 1 to 6 based on sequence variation within the HCV 5' noncoding (NC) region. In the present study, we evaluated the compatibility of Invader 1.0 with the COBAS MONITOR (COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR Test, version 2.0; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc., Branchburg, NJ), COBAS AMPLICOR (COBAS AMPLICOR Hepatitis C Virus Test, version 2.0; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.), and COBAS TaqMan (COBAS TaqMan HCV Test; Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) assays. The minimum HCV RNA titers required for successful HCV genotyping (>/=90% success rate) were 1,000 IU/ml for COBAS MONITOR, 100 IU/ml for COBAS AMPLICOR, and 10 IU/ml for COBAS TaqMan. Invader 1.0 results obtained from unpurified COBAS TaqMan amplification products of 111 retrospectively selected clinical serum specimens (genotypes 1 to 6, with virus titers ranging from 15.1 to 2.1 x 10(7) IU/ml) showed 98% concordance with results obtained from the TRUGENE HCV 5' NC Genotyping Kit (Bayer HealthCare LLC, Tarrytown, NY), used in conjunction with COBAS AMPLICOR. Although the assay is sensitive, accurate, and easy to perform, additional optimization of the Invader 1.0 interpretive software (Invader Data Analysis Worksheet) may be necessary to reduce potential misidentification of HCV genotypes in low-titer specimens. In summary, Invader 1.0 is compatible with a variety of commercially available PCR-based HCV 5' NC region amplification assays and is suitable for routine HCV genotyping in clinical laboratories.     

Multicenter Evaluation of the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Assay, an Integrated PCR System for Rapid Detection of Hepatitis C Virus RNA in the Diagnostic Laboratory

The benefits shown by the recent introduction of PCR for the in vitro diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has prompted the development of standardized, ready-to-use assays that can be implemented in routine clinical laboratories. We have evaluated the clinical performance of COBAS AMPLICOR HCV (COBAS), the first instrument system that allows the automation of HCV RNA amplification and detection, to determine its performance in the routine laboratory setting. More than 2,000 specimens collected at five centers were analyzed in parallel by the COBAS and the manual AMPLICOR HCV (AMPLICOR) tests, and the results were compared with the results for biochemical and serological markers of HCV. In this study the two PCR systems showed the same accuracy, with a concordance rate of 99.8%. As expected, the correlation between serology and PCR was not absolute because the presence of anti-HCV antibodies may be associated with a latent or past infection. On the other hand, if the presence of confirmed anti-HCV antibodies and elevated alanine aminotransferase levels are taken as the “gold standard,” indicating an active, ongoing infection, the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests show high and comparable sensitivities (100%) and specificities (98%), with positive and negative predictive values of 100 and 97%, respectively. During the study no false-positive reactions were detected. The use of an internal control allowed the identification of inhibitory substances that prevented amplification for 0.3 and 0.4% of samples tested by the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests, respectively. Compared to the manual system, the COBAS system allowed a significant reduction of hands-on time and could improve the overall laboratory work flow. In conclusion, these results support the use of the COBAS and AMPLICOR tests for the molecular diagnosis of active HCV infections.     

Evaluation of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of hepatitis C virus RNA.

BACKGROUND: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay for quantitative detection of HCV RNA has recently been introduced. OBJECTIVES: In this study, the performance of the Abbott RealTime HCV assay was evaluated and compared to the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test. STUDY DESIGN: Accuracy, linearity, interassay and intra-assay variations were determined, and a total of 243 routine clinical samples were investigated. RESULTS: When accuracy of the new assay was tested, the majority of results were found to be within +/-0.5 log(10) unit of the results obtained by reference laboratories. Determination of linearity resulted in a quasilinear curve up to 1.0 x 10(6)IU/ml. The interassay variation ranged from 15% to 32%, and the intra-assay variation ranged from 5% to 8%. When clinical samples were tested by the Abbott RealTime HCV assay and the results were compared with those obtained by the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan HCV test, the results for 93% of all samples with positive results by both tests were found to be within +/-1.0 log(10) unit. The viral loads for all patients measured by the Abbott and Roche assays showed a high correlation (R(2)=0.93); quantitative results obtained by the Abbott assay were found to be lower than those obtained by the Roche assay. CONCLUSIONS: The Abbott RealTime HCV assay proved to be suitable for use in the routine diagnostic laboratory. The time to results was similar for both of the assays.     

Performance characteristics of the COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor, Version 2.0, International Unit assay and the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay

The COBAS Amplicor Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) Monitor assay, version 2.0, which reports in international units per milliliter, was compared to the assay reported in copies per milliliter by analyzing dilution series and clinical plasma samples by both methods. In addition, the Amplicor international unit assay was compared to the National Genetics Institute HCV Superquant assay. The dilution series ranged from <100 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml and consisted of 32 points, assayed in triplicate in each assay. Thirty clinical samples ranging from 1,000 to 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml were assayed in duplicate. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor HCV RNA international units-per-milliliter and copies-per-milliliter assays was calculated as follows: (Amplicor international units per milliliter) = 1.030(Amplicor copies per milliliter) - 0.392; R(2) = 0.981; n = 28; S(y/x) (standard error of the estimate) = 0.129. The linearity of the Amplicor international units-per-milliliter assay was as follows: observed = 0.886(expected) + 0.437; R(2) = 0.983; n = 30. The linearity of the Superquant assay was as follows: observed= 0.918 (expected) + 0.436; R(2) = 0.986; n = 32. Deming regression analysis comparing the Amplicor and Superquant assays was calculated as follows: Superquant = 1.066(Amplicor) - 0.0197; R(2) = 0.908; S(y/x) = 0.308; n = 28. The Amplicor and Superquant assays were linear through the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml and approximately 300 to 5,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml, respectively. The narrow range of the Amplicor assay means that some samples will require dilution and retesting for accurate quantification above 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml. The Amplicor and Superquant assays agreed well within the range of 600 to 600,000 IU of HCV RNA/ml (approximately 1,000 to approximately 1,000,000 HCV RNA copies/ml). Overall, the Amplicor and Superquant assays agree well, and results obtained in one assay could be expected to compare well with results from the other when reported in copies per milliliter.     

Comparative evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0, QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0, and COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 Assays for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

A comparison of quantitative results expressed in hepatitis C virus (HCV) international units per milliliter, obtained from the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 (bDNA-3.0) assay, the QUANTIPLEX HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA-2.0) assay, and the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV MONITOR version 2.0 (HCM-2.0) test was performed. A total of 168 patient specimens submitted to the Mayo Clinic Molecular Microbiology Laboratory for HCV quantification or HCV genotyping were studied. Of the specimens tested, 97, 88, and 79% yielded quantitative results within the dynamic range of the bDNA-3.0, bDNA-2.0, and HCM-2.0 assays, respectively. Overall, there was substantial agreement between the results generated by all three assays. A total of 15 out of 29 (52%) of the specimens determined to contain viral loads of <31,746 IU/ml by the bDNA-3.0 assay were categorized as containing viral loads within the range of 31,746 to 500,000 IU/ml by the bDNA-2.0 assay. Although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the bDNA-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-2.0 assay was noted (P = 0.001). Likewise, although substantial agreement was noted between the results generated by the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 assays, a bias toward higher viral titer by the bDNA-3.0 assay was noted (P < or = 0.001). The discrepancy between the HCM-2.0 and bDNA-3.0 results was more pronounced when viral loads were >500,000 IU/ml and resulted in statistically significant differences (P < or = 0.001) in determining whether viral loads were above or below 800,000 IU/ml of HCV RNA, the proposed threshold value for tailoring the duration of combination therapy. The expression of quantitative values in HCV international units per milliliter was a strength of both the bDNA-3.0 and HCM-2.0 assays.     

Evaluation of the VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 assay for quantification of hepatitis C virus RNA in serum

We assessed the performance of a new assay (VERSANT HCV RNA 3.0 [bDNA 3.0] assay [Bayer Diagnostics]) to quantitate HCV RNA levels and compared the results of the bDNA 3.0 assay to results of the Quantiplex HCV RNA 2.0 (bDNA 2.0) assay. Samples used in this study included 211 serum specimens from hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected persons from two sites (Bordeaux and Marseille, France) with different genotypes; 383 serum specimens from HCV antibody-negative, HCV RNA-negative persons; and serial dilutions of World Health Organization (WHO) HCV RNA standard at a titer of 100,000 IU/ml. The specificity of the bDNA 3.0 assay was 98.2%. A high correlation was observed between expected and observed values in all dilutions of WHO standard (r = 0.9982), in serial dilutions of pooled samples (r = 0.9996), and in diluted sera from different HCV genotypes (r = 0.9930 to 0.9995). The standard deviations (SD) for the within-run and between-run reproducibility of the bDNA 3.0 assay were 相似文献