Adult weight gain, fat distribution and mammographic density in Spanish pre- and post-menopausal women (DDM-Spain)

High mammographic density (MD) is a phenotype risk marker for breast cancer. Body mass index (BMI) is inversely associated with MD, with the breast being a fat storage site. We investigated the influence of abdominal fat distribution and adult weight gain on MD, taking age, BMI and other confounders into account. Because visceral adiposity and BMI are associated with breast cancer only after menopause, differences in pre- and post-menopausal women were also explored. We recruited 3,584 women aged 45-68 years within the Spanish breast cancer screening network. Demographic, reproductive, family and personal history data were collected by purpose-trained staff, who measured current weight, height, waist and hip circumferences under the same protocol and with the same tools. MD was assessed in the left craniocaudal view using Boyd's Semiquantitative Scale. Association between waist-to-hip ratio, adult weight gain (difference between current weight and self-reported weight at 18 years) and MD was quantified by ordinal logistic regression, with random center-specific intercepts. Models were adjusted for age, BMI, breast size, time since menopause, parity, family history of breast cancer and hormonal replacement therapy use. Natural splines were used to describe the shape of the relationship between these two variables and MD. Waist-to-hip ratio was inversely associated with MD, and the effect was more pronounced in pre-menopausal (OR = 0.53 per 0.1 units; 95 % CI = 0.42-0.66) than in post-menopausal women (OR = 0.73; 95 % CI = 0.65-0.82) (P of heterogeneity = 0.010). In contrast, adult weight gain displayed a positive association with MD, which was similar in both groups (OR = 1.17 per 6 kg; 95 % CI = 1.11-1.23). Women who had gained more than 24 kg displayed higher MD (OR = 2.05; 95 % CI = 1.53-2.73). MD was also evaluated using Wolfe's and Tabár's classifications, with similar results being obtained. Once BMI, fat distribution and other confounders were considered, our results showed a clear dose-response gradient between the number of kg gained during adulthood and the proportion of dense tissue in the breast.     

Lactation and breast carcinoma risk in a South African population.

BACKGROUND: A number of epidemiologic studies have reported a reduced risk of breast carcinoma among women who have lactated but others have not. The current study presents data regarding lactation and breast carcinoma risk from a hospital-based case-control study of black and colored South African women. METHODS: Incident breast carcinoma cases treated between January 1994 and October 1997 (n = 446) at 2 major hospitals in Cape Town and hospital patients admitted for conditions unrelated to breast carcinoma (controls, n = 1471) were queried regarding the duration of breast-feeding each liveborn child and breast carcinoma risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for various categories of lactation compared with a reference category of never having breast-fed among women who had had at least one full term live birth. RESULTS: Approximately 83% of cases and 85% of controls had ever breast-fed (OR = 0.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.7-1.3). Among all subjects, the ORs for those who lactated for <3 years were near or at unity. Beyond 3 years, ORs extending up to >/=7 years were less than unity, but the 95% CIs included 1.0 (OR for duration of >/=7 years = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.4-1.3). ORs did not vary by menopausal status. Breast carcinoma risk was not found to be related to the duration of breast-feeding the first child, the number of children breast-fed, or the patient's age at first lactation. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the current study suggest lactation has little or no protective effect on breast carcinoma risk.     

Analysis of menstrual, reproductive, and life-style factors for breast cancer risk in Turkish women: a case-control study

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between menstrual, reproductive, and life-style factors and breast cancer in Turkish women. In a hospital-based case-control study in Ankara, 622 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer were compared with 622 age-matched controls, admitted to the same hospital for acute and non-neoplastic diseases. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) related to risk factors. Overall, menopausal status and age at menopause were found to be significantly associated with breast cancer. Having a full-term pregnancy and early age at first birth were associated with decreased breast cancer risk (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.30-0.66; OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.22-0.53, respectively). Postmenopausal women with lactation longer than 48 mo had reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.14-0.93). In conclusion, decreased parity, late age at first birth, early menopause, and shorter duration of lactation were the most important determinants of breast cancer risk in Turkish women.     

Lactation and breast cancer risk: a case-control study in Connecticut

In this report, we examined the relationship between lactation and breast cancer risk, in a case-control study of breast cancer, conducted in Connecticut between 1994 and 1998. Included were 608 incident breast cancer cases and 609 age frequency matched controls, aged 30-80 years old. Cases and controls were interviewed by trained study interviewers, using a standardized, structured questionnaire, to obtain information on lactation and other major risk factors. Parous women who reported ever lactation had a borderline significantly reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.63-1.09). An OR of 0.53 (95% CI, 0.27-1.04) was observed in those having breastfed more than 3 children compared to those who never lactated. Women having breastfed their first child for more than 13 months had an OR of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.23-0.94) compared to those who never breastfed. Lifetime duration of lactation also showed a risk reduction while none of the ORs were statistically significant. Further stratification by menopausal status showed a risk reduction related to lactation for both pre- and postmenopausal women, while the relationship is less consistent for the latter. These results support an inverse association between breastfeeding and breast cancer risk.     

Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Iranian Women Aged Less than 40 Years

This case-control study was carried out in a university-affiliated teaching hospital, Tehran city, Iran. A total of312 newly diagnosed cases aged less than 40 years old participated and were matched for age and ethnicity with312 controls. The results showed that in women who never married (OR=2.42 95%CI=1.51-3.88) (P<0.001), hada family history of breast cancer (OR=7.07 95%CI=2.95-16.99) (P<0.001), a low age of menarche (OR=0.1 95%CI=0.04-0.23) (P<0.001)), lower parity (OR=13.3 95% CI=3.89-45.66) (P<0.001) and took oral contraceptive pills(OR= 2.83 95% CI=1.87-4.24) (P<0.000) were at increased risk. A direct association with age at first birth wasalso evident(P=0.041), with a significantly inverse association between duration of lactation and breast cancer risk(p=0.016). On multivariate logistic regression, parity, family history of breast cancer, use of oral contraceptivepills, and age at first birth remained significant. In women lower than 40 years of age, breast cancer risk wassignificantly higher in women with parity ≥4 compared with nulliparity but no association emerged with historyof breast-feeding. Other risk factors were similar to those described in breast cancer epidemiology at any age.     

Lifetime exercise activity and breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women.

Lifetime exercise activity has been linked to breast cancer risk among young women. However, no study has specifically evaluated whether lifetime exercise activity is related to the breast cancer risk of post-menopausal women. We conducted a population-based case-control study of post-menopausal white women (1123 newly diagnosed cases and 904 healthy controls) aged 55-64 who lived in Los Angeles County, California, USA to evaluate this relationship. Although neither exercise activity from menarche to age 40 years, nor exercise after age 40 separately predicted breast cancer risk, risk was lower among women who had exercised each week for at least 17.6 MET-hours (metabolic equivalent of energy expenditure multiplied by hours of activity) since menarche than among inactive women (odds ratio (OR) = 0.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37-0.83). Exercise activity was not protective for women who gained considerable (> 17%) weight during adulthood. However, among women with more stable weight, breast cancer risk was substantially reduced for those who consistently exercised at high levels throughout their lifetime (OR = 0.42; 95% CI 0.24-0.75), those who exercised more than 4 h per week for at least 12 years (OR = 0.59; 95% CI 0.40-0.88), and those who exercised vigorously (24.5 MET-hours per week) during the most recent 10 years (OR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.32-0.85). Strenuous exercise appears to reduce breast cancer risk among post-menopausal women who do not gain sizable amounts of weight during adulthood.     

Analysis of menstrual, reproductive, and life-style factors for breast cancer risk in Turkish women

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between menstrual, reproductive, and life-style factors and breast cancer in Turkish women. In a hospital-based case-control study in Ankara, 622 patients with histologically confirmed breast cancer were compared with 622 age-matched controls, admitted to the same hospital for acute and non-neoplastic diseases. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) related to risk factors. Overall, menopausal status and age at menopause were found to be significantly associated with breast cancer. Having a full-term pregnancy and early age at first birth were associated with decreased breast cancer risk (OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.30–0.66; OR=0.34, 95% CI=0.22–0.53, respectively). Postmenopausal women with lactation longer than 48 mo had reduced risk of breast cancer (OR=0.36, 95% CI=0.14–0.93). In conclusion, decreased parity, late age at first birth, early menopause, and shorter duration of lactation were the most important determinants of breast cancer risk in Turkish women.     

The relation of reproductive factors to mortality from breast cancer.

Young women with breast cancer have been reported to have an increased risk of dying from their disease if they have given birth in <2 years before diagnosis. The prognostic factors associated with the tumors of these women have not been thoroughly studied. We examined the tumors of the women who had a recent birth and compared the tumor characteristics with those of women who were nulliparous or had given birth > or =5 years before diagnosis. A follow-up study was conducted of 1174 women <45 years old whose invasive ductal breast cancer was diagnosed from January 1983 to December 1992 in three counties of western Washington. These women had participated previously in a population-based, case-control study. Mean follow-up time was 105.4 months. Histological slides were collected for 79.1% of the tumors and reviewed by the study pathologist. Using immunoperoxidase assays, tumor tissue was tested for prognostic markers for 70.4% of the tumors from the women. Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the relative risk of dying from breast cancer associated with reproductive events. Logistic regression was used to obtain estimates of the association between various reproductive factors and tumor characteristics. At the end of follow-up, 48.2% of the women (n = 83) whose last birth occurred in < 2 years of diagnosis had died, compared with 23.3% of nulliparous women (n = 189) and 24.4% of the women (n = 661) whose last birth was > or =5 years before diagnosis. The tumors of the women with a recent birth (<2 years before diagnosis) were more likely to be progesterone receptor negative, odds ratio (OR) = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-3.9, to be p53 positive, OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.5-4.7, to be of high histological grade, OR = 5.9, 95% CI = 1.7-20.1, to have high mitotic count, OR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.4-4.4, to be node positive, OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.3-3.5, to have a high S phase fraction, OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.1-4.8, and to have a high American Joint Committee on Cancer stage (III+), OR = 2.8, 95% CI 1.3-5.8, compared with the tumors of nulliparous women. After adjusting for tumor characteristics and treatment, the risk of mortality associated with a birth in < 2 years of diagnosis of breast cancer remained an independent predictor of mortality, hazard radio (HR) = 2.7, 95% CI = 1.6-4.3. Our study provides evidence that reproductive factors influence the biological behavior of breast cancer in young women and prognosis. Clinicians need to be aware that women who have delivered a child in < 2 years before diagnosis are at increased risk of having tumors with especially adverse prognostic profiles and have a poorer survival rate than women who are nulliparous or whose last birth was some years in the past.     

Differences in breast cancer risk factors by tumor marker subtypes among premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese women.

We evaluated associations between reproductive and lifestyle risk factors with breast cancer tumor marker status in a case-control study. Cases were premenopausal women living in Vietnam and China who were eligible for a clinical trial of oophorectomy and tamoxifen as treatment for breast cancer (n = 682). Controls were nonrelative hospital visitors, matched on age to the cases (n = 649). Immunohistochemical analysis was used to identify the presence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor and the overexpression of HER-2/neu oncogene. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using unconditional logistic regression, adjusted for known confounders. Overall, 280 (61%) tumor samples were ER positive and 176 (38%) were ER negative. HER-2/neu overexpression was detected in 161 (35%) samples, whereas 286 (26%) samples were HER-2/neu negative. We observed an inverse trend between increasing parity and decreasing breast cancer risk (P = 0.002). Women ages > or =25 years at first birth had increased breast cancer risk compared with women ages <25 years at first birth (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.20-1.95). Women who consumed alcohol had increased risk of breast cancer compared with women who did not (OR,1.85; 95% CI, 1.32-2.61). Compared with controls, OR estimates for breast cancer by parity and age at first birth were significantly associated with ER and/or HER-2/neu tumor status by Wald test (P < 0.05). Family history, age at menarche, cumulative lactation, body mass index, and education were not significantly related to breast cancer risk. Our findings support the hypothesis that some breast cancer risk factors differ by ER and HER-2/neu tumor marker subtypes.     

Birth characteristics and breast cancer risk: a study among like-sexed twins

High birth weight has been proposed to increase the risk of breast cancer. Birth weight and gestational age are positively associated with intrauterine estrogen exposure, which may initiate the carcinogenic process in mammary gland tissue and determine mammary gland cell mass later in life. In the present case-control study, we retrieved birth records for 96 female twin pairs where one twin had developed breast cancer. We used two control groups. In the external comparison, we used aged-matched twins as the control group, and in the within-pair comparison the control group included the healthy twin sisters. Odds ratio (OR) was used to estimate the relative risk, using 95% confidence intervals (CI). Compared with twins with gestational age less than 33 weeks, twins with gestational age of more than 40 weeks were at increased risk of breast cancer (OR = 8.4; 95% CI 1.3-54.4). In the within-pair comparison, mean birth weight and ponderal index were higher among cases compared with their co-twins (p = 0.07 and p = 0.05, respectively). The risk of breast cancer increased with birth weight. Compared with women with birth weight of less than 2,000 g, women with birth weight of at least 3,000 g had a nonsignificant increase in risk of developing breast cancer (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 0.7-18.5). The results give some support to the hypothesis that the fetal environment influences adult breast cancer risk.     

Maternal breast cancer risk after the death of a child

The possible association between a severe traumatic life event (death of a child) and breast cancer risk was examined in a case-control study nested within a nation-wide cohort in Sweden. Our study population included 27,571 women with breast cancer and 141,798 control women born between 1925-1976. After adjustment for age, parity, age at first birth and education, the overall risk estimate for breast cancer among all women that had experienced the death of a child was 1.05 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96-1.15). Among uniparous women the corresponding odds ratio (OR) was 1.27 (95% CI = 0.98-1.64). When stratifying for child's age at death a significant risk increase was detected among women that had lost their only child when the child was between 1-4 years of age (OR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.06-6.60). These findings do not support an overall increase in breast cancer risk after the death of a child, a severe traumatic life event. Based on a small number of subjects, our finding of an increased risk in a subgroup of uniparous women losing their only child could be due to chance.     

Effect of pregnancy as a risk factor for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers

Early age at first birth and multiparity have been associated with a decrease in the risk of breast cancer in women in the general population. We examined whether this relationship is also present in women at high risk of breast cancer due to the presence of a mutation in either of the 2 breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 or BRCA2. We performed a matched case-control study of 1,260 pairs of women with known BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, recruited from North America, Europe and Israel. Women who had been diagnosed with breast cancer were matched with unaffected control subjects for year of birth, country of residence, and mutation (BRCA1 or BRCA2). Study subjects completed a questionnaire detailing their reproductive histories. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived by conditional logistic regression. Among BRCA1 carriers, parity per se was not associated with the risk of breast cancer (OR for parous vs. nulliparous = 0.94; 95% CI = 0.75-1.19; p = 0.62). However, women with a BRCA1 mutation and 4 or more children had a 38% decrease in breast cancer risk compared to nulliparous women (OR = 0.62; 95% CI = 0.41-0.94). In contrast, among BRCA2 carriers, increasing parity was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer; women with 2 or more children were at approximately 1.5 times the risk of breast cancer as nulliparous women (OR = 1.53; 95% CI = 1.01-2.32; p = 0.05). Among women with BRCA2 mutations and who were younger than age 50, the (adjusted) risk of breast cancer increased by 17% with each additional birth (OR = 1.17; 95% CI = 1.01-1.36; p = 0.03). There was no significant increase in the risk of breast cancer among BRCA2 carriers older than 50 (OR for each additional birth = 0.97; 95% CI = 0.58-1.53; p = 0.92). In the 2-year period following a birth, the risk of breast cancer in a BRCA2 carrier was increased by 70% compared to nulliparous controls (OR = 1.70; 95% CI = 0.97-3.0). There was a much smaller increase in breast cancer risk among BRCA2 carriers whose last birth was 5 or more years in the past (OR = 1.24; 95% CI = 0.79-1.95). A modest reduction in risk of breast cancer was observed among BRCA1 carriers with 4 or more births. Among BRCA2 carriers, increasing parity was associated with a significant increase in the risk of breast cancer before age 50 and this increase was greatest in the 2-year period following a pregnancy.     

Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer according to tumor characteristics and mode of detection: a Spanish population-based case-control study

Introduction

It is not clear whether high mammographic density (MD) is equally associated with all subtypes of breast cancer (BC). We investigated the association between MD and subsequent BC, considering invasiveness, means of detection, pathologic subtype, and the time elapsed since mammographic exploration and BC diagnosis.

Methods

BC cases occurring in the population of women who attended screening from 1997 through 2004 in Navarre, a Spanish region with a fully consolidated screening program, were identified via record linkage with the Navarre Cancer Registry (n = 1,172). Information was extracted from the records of their first attendance at screening in that period. For each case, we randomly selected four controls, matched by screening round, year of birth, and place of residence. Cases were classified according to invasiveness (ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) versus invasive tumors), pathologic subtype (considering hormonal receptors and HER2), and type of diagnosis (screen-detected versus interval cases). MD was evaluated by a single, experienced radiologist by using a semiquantitative scale. Data on BC risk factors were obtained by the screening program in the corresponding round. The association between MD and tumor subtype was assessed by using conditional logistic regression.

Results

MD was clearly associated with subsequent BC. The odds ratio (OR) for the highest MD category (MD >75%) compared with the reference category (MD <10%) was similar for DCIS (OR = 3.47; 95% CI = 1.46 to 8.27) and invasive tumors (OR = 2.95; 95% CI = 2.01 to 4.35). The excess risk was particularly high for interval cases (OR = 7.72; 95% CI = 4.02 to 14.81) in comparison with screened detected tumors (OR = 2.17; 95% CI = 1.40 to 3.36). Sensitivity analyses excluding interval cases diagnosed in the first year after MD assessment or immediately after an early recall to screening yielded similar results. No differences were seen regarding pathologic subtypes. The excess risk associated with MD persisted for at least 7 to 8 years after mammographic exploration.

Conclusions

Our results confirm that MD is an important risk factor for all types of breast cancer. High breast density strongly increases the risk of developing an interval tumor, and this excess risk is not completely explained by a possible masking effect.     

Risk factors for hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in postmenopausal women.

The effect of classic breast cancer risk factors on hormone receptor-defined breast cancer is not fully clarified. We explored these associations in a Swedish population-based study. Postmenopausal women ages 50 to 74 years, diagnosed with invasive breast cancer during 1993 to 1995, were compared with 3,065 age frequency-matched controls. We identified 332 estrogen receptor (ER-) and progesterone receptor (PR-) negative, 286 ER+PR-, 71 ER-PR+, 1,165 ER+PR+, and 789 tumors with unknown receptor status. Unconditional logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Women ages >or=30 years, compared with those ages 20 to 24 years at first birth, were at an increased risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8) but not ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.8-1.6). Women who gained >or=30 kg in weight during adulthood had an approximately 3-fold increased relative risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 1.9-3.8), but no risk increase of ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.5-2.1), compared with women who gained <10 kg. Compared with never users, women who used menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy for at least 5 years were at increased risk of ER+PR+ tumors (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 2.1-4.1) but not ER-PR- tumors (OR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5). In conclusion, other risk factors were similarly related to breast cancer regardless of receptor status, but high age at first birth, substantial weight gain in adult age, and use of menopausal estrogen-progestin therapy were more strongly related to receptor-positive breast cancer than receptor-negative breast cancer.     

Risk factors for breast cancer: A case-control study of screen-detected breast cancer in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan

We examined the associations between reproductive factors and the risk of breast cancer on the basis of information from a total of 201,363 breast cancer screening program participants in Miyagi Prefecture, Japan, during 1987-1991. A case-control study method was applied on analysis. Data on 204 breast cancer cases identified and 810 screening year-, age- and screening area-matched normal controls were extracted. After adjustment for potential confounders, a trend of decreasing risk of breast cancer with increasing number of parity was observed (p for trend=0.03). Among parous women, lactation for the last child decreased the risk of breast cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.39–0.94). These findings were consistent with those in clinical breast cancer reported previously. When cases were divided into two age groups, younger ( 49 y.o.) and older (50 y.o. ), family history of breast cancer among mother and sisters (OR=3.51, 95% CI 1.05–11.80), and lactation for the last child (OR=0.46, 95% CI 0.25–0.84) were associated with younger age breast cancer, whereas number of parity was associated with older age breast cancer (p for trend=0.03). The results by age group suggest that different mechanisms may exist in breast cancer developing at early and late onsets.     

Effects of Menstrual and Reproductive Factors on the Risk of Breast Cancer: Meta-analysis of the Case-Control Studies in Japan

To elucidate the magnitude of the effect of menstrual and reproductive factors on breast cancer occurrence among Japanese women, we reviewed eight case-control studies previously conducted in Japan and used a quantitative method (meta-analysis) to summarize the data. While individual studies have different methods and populations, the estimated odds ratios (ORs) in the studies were statistically homogeneous for all study variables. It was confirmed that early age at menarche, late age at first birth, and premenopausal status are significantly associated with risk of breast cancer; an estimated combined OR of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.59-0.77) was obtained for women with onset of menstruation after age 16 compared to those before age 14. Nulliparous women had higher risk than women with first birth before age 25 (OR=1.56 95%, CI: 1.27-1.91). The OR for women with first birth after age 35 was 2.26 (95% CI: 1.85-2.77) compared to women at first birth before age 25. Premenopausal women had a higher risk than women with menopause before age 50 (OR=2.21, 95% CI: 1.53-3.20). We also found a significant protective effect of high parity after controlling for age at first birth and the other menstrual factors. The OR estimate for 3 or more births compared to nulliparity was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.54-0.86). The meta-analysis provided quantitative estimates of breast cancer risk among Japanese women with improved precision.     

克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌危险因素的病例对照研究

 目的　探讨克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌的危险因素。方法　用病例对照研究方法调查129例女性乳腺癌和对应的129名对照者,用Logistic回归模型进行乳腺癌危险因素分析。结果　乳腺癌的危险因素有乳腺癌家族史（OR＝2.744,95 % CI＝1.884～4.674）、乳腺增生症（OR＝1.423,95 % CI＝1.160～1.810）、 乳腺炎（OR＝2.363,95 % CI＝2.039～3.934）、子宫肌瘤（OR＝1.623,95 % CI＝1.263～2.024）、 流产（OR＝1.723,95 % CI＝1.143～2.600）、 饮酒（OR＝1.243,95 % CI＝1.040～1.483）、精神创伤（OR＝2.184,95 % CI＝1.753～3.025）、长期接触电离辐射（OR＝1.374,95 % CI＝1.152～1.699）; 保护因素有初潮年龄增大（OR＝0.773,95 % CI＝0.674～0.956）、累计哺乳时间（OR＝0.672,95 % CI＝0.480～0.941）、坚持运动（OR＝0.572,95 % CI＝0.391～0.837）。结论　以上11个因素为克拉玛依市区女性乳腺癌重要的危险因素和保护因素。     

Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk.

Among participants of the biennial Nijmegen breast cancer screening programme, we examined whether diminution of mammographic breast density lowered breast cancer risk. Post-menopausal breast cancer cases (n = 108), who had to have participated in all the five screening rounds prior to their diagnosis, were matched to 400 controls on year of birth and screening history. Controls had to be free of breast cancer at the time of the case's diagnosis. Changes in breast density were measured over a 10-year period, by a fully computerized method. Women in whom 5-25% or >25% of the breast was composed of fibro-glandular density showed a threefold increased 10-year risk compared to women with <5% density. In women with 5-25% density initially, we observed a trend of decreasing risk with diminishing density: when women with <5% density throughout the whole period formed the reference category, the odds ratio (OR) for those who decreased from 5-25% to <5% density was 1.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-6.1] in contrast to the OR of 5.7 (95% CI = 2.2-15.2) for those with persisting 5-25% density. In women who increased from 5-25% density to >25% density the OR was 6.9 (95% CI = 2.1-22.9). In women with >25% density initially, diminishing density was not clearly associated with lowering risk, which may be partly explained by the low number of women who decreased to <5% (n = 12). Due to the limited size of the study these results have to be interpreted with caution. Although the results are not conclusive, they could indicate a trend of decreasing risk with diminishing breast density. Should this effect be real, it may have great implications for the primary prevention of breast cancer or for the identification of high-risk groups who would benefit by more frequent screening. Therefore, large-scale, long-term follow-up studies on the effects of changes in breast density are needed.     

Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Uptake: A Pre Intervention Community Survey in Malaysia

Introduction: Despite health education efforts to educate women on breast cancer and breast cancer screeningmodalities, the incidence of breast cancer and presentation at an advanced stage are still a problem in Malaysia.Objectives: To determine factors associated with the uptake of breast cancer screening among women in thegeneral population. Methods: This pre-intervention survey was conducted in a suburban district. All householdswere approached and women aged 20 to 60 years old were interviewed with pre-tested guided questionnaires.Variables collected included socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge on breast cancer and screeningpractice of breast cancer. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed. Results: 41.5% of a total of381 respondents scored above average; the mean knowledge score on causes and risks factors of breast cancerwas 3.41 out of 5 (SD1.609). 58.5% had ever practiced BSE with half of them performing it at regular monthlyintervals. Uptake of CBE by nurses and by doctors was 40.7% and 37.3%, respectively. Mammogram uptakewas 14.6%. Significant predictors of BSE were good knowledge of breast cancer (OR=2.654, 95% CI: 1.033-6.816), being married (OR=2.213, 95% CI: 1.201-4.076) and attending CBE (OR=1.729, 95% CI: 1.122-2.665).Significant predictors for CBE included being married (OR=2.161, 95% CI: 1.174-3.979), good knowledge ofbreast cancer (OR=2.286, 95% CI: 1.012-5.161), and social support for breast cancer screening (OR=2.312, 95%CI: 1.245-4.293). Women who had CBE were more likely to undergo mammographic screening of the breast(OR=5.744, 95% CI: 2.112-15.623), p<0.005. Conclusion: CBE attendance is a strong factor in promoting BSEand mammography, educating women on the importance of breast cancer screening and on how to conduct BSE.The currently opportunistic conduct of CBE should be extended to active calling of women for CBE.     

Risk factors for breast cancer in Turkish women with early pregnancies and long-lasting lactation--a case-control study

A hospital-based case-control study was carried out among 504 women with breast cancer and 610 controls to analyse the risk factors for breast cancer in Turkey. Adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each risk factor were obtained from logistic regression analysis. Risk factors for breast cancer were found to be long-term lactation (> or = 5 years versus never OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.79), young age at menarche (< 15 years versus > or = 15 OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.30-2.28), late age at first full-term pregnancy (> or = 30 versus < 20 OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.32-6.21), oral contraceptive use (ever versus never OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.10-2.08), positive family history (positive versus negative OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.35-5.82), and menstrual irregularity (yes versus no OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.49). The results of the present study will lead to a better understanding of the risk factors for breast cancer in a developing country.