The perceptions of attending doctors of the role of residents as teachers of undergraduate clinical students

INTRODUCTION: Much of undergraduate clinical teaching is provided by residents. An earlier study showed the attitude of residents towards teaching to be generally positive. Little is known, however, about attending doctors' views on their own and residents' roles as teachers of medical students. OBJECTIVES: To examine attending doctors' perceptions of the (dis)advantages of resident teaching, their own teaching abilities and the need for a teacher training programme for residents. METHOD: A questionnaire survey of 76 attending doctors was carried out in the Departments of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and Paediatrics at the teaching hospitals of the Universities of Maastricht and Amsterdam, the Netherlands. RESULTS: Attending doctors perceive teaching by residents to be beneficial for students and residents alike. Although they consider themselves to be better suited than residents to teach medical students, they see teaching as an integral part of residency training and feel it should be recognised as such by departments and medical schools. Attending doctors are in favour of a teacher training programme for residents, which should include communication, clinical and teaching skills as well as skills such as time management and (self-) assessment. DISCUSSION: Despite the uneven distribution of participants between the departments, no significant differences were found between departments. It is interesting that attending doctors perceive teacher training as beneficial to residents' teaching skills, but provide more feedback on residents' attitudes than on their teaching. The results show that, in general, attending doctors share residents' views that teaching is an important component of residency and that a teacher training programme for residents is to be recommended.     

What do students actually do on an internal medicine clerkship? A log diary study

BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the amount of time students spend on teaching and learning while on internal medicine clerkships, and existing data suggest a wide international variation. Community-based teaching of internal medicine is now widespread; but its strengths and weaknesses compared to traditional hospital based teaching are still unclear. AIM: To determine the proportion of time students spend on different activities on an internal medicine clerkship, and to determine whether this differs in general practice and in hospital. In addition we aimed to determine students' views on the educational value and enjoyment of various activities. METHODS: Prospective completion of log diaries recording student activities. Each student was asked to complete the diary for two separate weeks of their internal medicine clerkship: one week of general practice-based teaching and one week of hospital-based teaching. RESULTS: The response rate was 68% (88/130). Students spent approximately 5.5 h per day on teaching and learning activities in both environments, with more time (50 min vs. 30 min, P = 0.007) on unsupervised interaction with patients in hospital than in general practice, and more time (53 min vs. 21 min, P < 0.001) undergoingassessment in general practice than in hospital. Standard deviations were wide, demonstrating the heterogeneous nature of the data. Students perceived supervised interaction with patients and teaching by doctors as the most educational activities in both environments, but found it even more educationally valuable and enjoyable in general practice than in hospital (mean score for educational value: 4.27 in general practice, 3.88 in hospital, P = 0.048; mean score for enjoyment 4.13 in general practice, 3.66 in hospital, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Students greatly value interactions with patients, perceiving these as both educational and enjoyable. Curriculum planners must continue to place patient-based learning at the centre of undergraduate medical education. The heterogeneity of the data suggests that individual students have very different experiences, despite apparently similar timetables.     

How medical residents perceive the quality of supervision provided by attending doctors in the clinical setting

INTRODUCTION: The supervision of medical residents is a key responsibility of attending doctors in the clinical setting. Most attending doctors, however, are unfamiliar with the principles of effective supervision. Although inconsistent, supervision has been shown to be both important and effective for the professional development of medical residents. OBJECTIVE: To examine how medical residents perceive the supervisory roles of attending doctors, in terms of what they perceive as poor supervision and what they characterise as good supervisory practice. METHOD: We carried out a questionnaire survey of 38 medical residents at the Department of Paediatrics at the teaching hospital of the University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Attending doctors directly involved with the supervision of medical residents participated in the study. The clinical settings where supervision occurred included the neonatal and paediatric intensive care units and the general paediatric wards. RESULTS: Medical residents rated the quality of supervision they received in all departments positively. A majority of the attending doctors were rated highly in 'overall supervision'. Creating pleasant learning environments and being stimulated to learn and function independently were aspects of supervision characterised positively. Coaching in clinical skills and procedures, effective communication skills and clinical decision making using principles of cost-appropriate care were aspects of supervision found to be deficient. DISCUSSION: This study shows that medical residents enjoy supervision from collaborative, understanding and patient attending doctors. Medical residents prefer to be treated as adult learners and enjoy feedback that is constructive, measured and adapted to their professional needs.     

Use of critical incidents to develop a rating form for resident evaluation of faculty teaching

CONTEXT: Monitoring the teaching effectiveness of attending physicians is important to enhancing the quality of graduate medical education. METHODS: We used a critical incident technique with 35 residents representing a cross-section of programmes in a teaching hospital to develop a 23-item rating form. We obtained ratings of 11 attending physicians in internal medicine and general surgery from 54 residents. We performed linear and logistic regression analysis to relate the items on the form to the residents' overall ratings of the attending physicians and the programme directors' ratings of the attending physicians. RESULTS: The residents rated the attending physicians highly in most areas, but lower in provision of feedback, clarity of written communication and cost-effectiveness in making clinical decisions. When we used the residents' overall ratings as the criterion, the most important aspects of attending physicians' teaching were clarity of written communication, cost-effectiveness, commitment of time and energy and whether the resident would refer a family member or friend to the physician. When we used the programme directors' ratings as the criterion, the additional important aspects of performance were concern for the residents' professional well-being, knowledge of the literature and the delivery of clear verbal and written communication. CONCLUSIONS: The critical incident technique can be used to develop an instrument that demonstrates content and construct validity. We found that residents consider commitment of time to teaching and clinical effectiveness to be the most important dimensions of faculty teaching. Other important dimensions include written and verbal communication, cost-effectiveness and concern for residents' professional development.     

Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients

CONTEXT: Standardised assessments of practising doctors are receiving growing support, but theoretical and logistical issues pose serious obstacles. OBJECTIVES: To obtain reference performance levels from experienced doctors on computer-based case simulation (CCS) and standardised patient-based (SP) methods, and to evaluate the utility of these methods in diagnostic assessment. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was carried out at a military tertiary care facility and involved 54 residents and credentialed staff from the emergency medicine, general surgery and internal medicine departments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Doctors completed 8 CCS and 8 SP cases targeted at doctors entering the profession. Standardised patient performances were compared to archived Year 4 medical student data. RESULTS: While staff doctors and residents performed well on both CCS and SP cases, a wide range of scores was exhibited on all cases. There were no significant differences between the scores of participants from differing specialties or of varying experience. Among participants who completed both CCS and SP testing (n = 44), a moderate positive correlation between CCS and SP checklist scores was observed. There was a negative correlation between doctor experience and SP checklist scores. Whereas the time students spent with SPs varied little with clinical task, doctors appeared to spend more time on communication/counselling cases than on cases involving acute/chronic medical problems. CONCLUSION: Computer-based case simulations and standardised patient-based assessments may be useful as part of a multimodal programme to evaluate practising doctors. Additional study is needed on SP standard setting and scoring methods. Establishing empirical likelihoods for a range of performances on assessments of this character should receive priority.     

综合医院便捷门诊绩效分析

目的：探讨综合医院设立便捷门诊的意义。方法：统计了2006年9—12月医院便捷门诊和内科门诊就诊人数、收入及患者满意度，分析社会和经济效益。结果：便捷门诊患者对就医便捷的满意率明显高于内科门诊，P〈0．05；而医疗服务态度及技术水平的满意率在两组间则无明显差异；便捷门诊9～12月份就诊人数平均增幅152．8％；经济收益亦呈上升趋势，平均增幅为33．2％；内科门诊9-12月份就诊人数平均增幅为13．2％，经济收益平均增幅为68．1％。结论：便捷门诊使患者在综合医院门诊就医更加方便、快捷；医院也能从中获得良好的社会和经济效益。提示便捷门诊的设立在综合医院门诊中具有较重要的意义。     

How clinical communication has become a core part of medical education in the UK

Context  This paper sets out to analyse and interpret the complex events of the last 20 years in order to understand how the teaching and learning of clinical communication has emerged as a core part of the modern undergraduate medical curriculum in most medical schools in the UK.
Methods  The paper analyses the effects of key political, sociological, historical and policy influences on clinical communication development.
Results  Political influences include: the effects of neo-liberalism on society and on the professions in general; the challenging of traditional notions of professionalism in medicine; the creation of an internal market within the National Health Service, and the disempowerment of the medical lobby. Sociological influences include: the effects of a 'marketised' society on medicine and subtle shifts in the doctor−patient relationship because of this; the emergence of globalised information through the Internet, and the influence of increased litigation against doctors. Historical influences include: the effects of a change in emphasis for medical education away from an inflated factual curriculum towards a curriculum that recognises the importance of student attitudes and the teaching and learning of clinical communication skills. Policy influences include the important effects of Tomorrow's Doctors and the Dearing Report on the modern medical curriculum.
Conclusions  The paper concludes with a developmental map that charts the complex influences on clinical communication teaching and learning and a brief commentary on the growing body of teachers who deliver and develop the subject today.     

The interpersonal, cognitive and efficiency domains of clinical teaching: construct validity of a multi-dimensional scale

BACKGROUND: We are unaware of any hypothesis-driven studies showing that teaching assessments are comprised solely of interpersonal and cognitive domains. Moreover, previous teaching assessments have been biased by heterogeneous samples of evaluators. Consequently, we investigated the construct validity of faculty assessments comprised of interpersonal and cognitive domains, utilising evaluations obtained from resident doctors on an internal medicine hospital service. METHODS: A total of 1000 inpatient evaluations were completed on 60 general internal medicine faculty members. Education theory supported a 2-dimensional, 14-item scale. Principal factor analysis was used to explore the scale's dimensionality. Internal reliability and interobserver agreement were determined. Relationships between domains and instructor characteristics were also examined. RESULTS: Principal factor analysis revealed interpersonal, clinical teaching and efficiency domains. Internal reliabilities of all domains are high (alpha > 0.90). Interobserver agreement is good (range 0.64-0.83). In the interpersonal domain there is a trend towards higher scores for lower ranking faculty. Significant findings are higher overall scores in the interpersonal domain (P < 0.001), higher scores for assistant professors in the interpersonal domain (P = 0.008) and higher scores for male than female faculty in the interpersonal (P = 0.041) and clinical teaching (P = 0.008) domains. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical teaching evaluations are reducible to interpersonal, clinical teaching and efficiency domains. Evidence for construct validity includes predicted domains and high internal and interobserver reliabilities. Utilising a homogenous sample of evaluators minimised variance. Interestingly, lower ranking faculty scored higher in the interpersonal domain, suggesting that lower ranking faculty may focus more attention on teaching activities than full professors do.     

Professionalism in medical education, an American perspective: from evidence to accountability

CONTEXT :Professionalism is central to sustaining the public's trust in the medical profession; it is the essence of the doctor-patient relationship. Evidence exists that public trust is waning and that doctors are facing powerful contemporary threats to their professional values. The role of medical education is paramount in preparing future doctors to recognise and overcome these threats; to do so will require substantial change in the culture and environment of medical education. OBJECTIVES: The aims of this paper are to provide a definition and framework for professionalism in the context of medical education, describe current threats to medical professionalism, and detail the role medical schools and academic medical centres can play in preparing tomorrow's doctors to recognise and resist these threats. Additionally, the paper reviews established and potential methods for measuring professionalism and thus assuring public accountability. Finally, specific recommendations are offered for medical schools and teaching hospitals to nurture and sustain professionalism. DISCUSSION: The progressive intrusion of commercialism into the realm of medicine is threatening to replace the ethics of professionalism with the irreconcilable ethics of the marketplace. Academic medicine must assume greater responsibility and accountability for strengthening the resolve of future doctors to sustain their commitment to the ethics of professionalism. It can do so by improving the medical school admission process, enhancing both formal and experiential teaching of professionalism, and purging the educational environment of unprofessional practices. Ten approaches that academic medicine might adopt to achieve these goals are provided.     

Assessment of personal qualities in relation to admission to medical school

BACKGROUND: Recently there has been much scrutiny of the medical school admissions process by universities, the General Medical Council and the public. Improved objectivity, fairness and effectiveness of selection procedures are desirable. The ultimate outcome sought is the graduation of competent doctors who reflect the values of and are in tune with the communities they serve. METHODS: Applicants to the Scottish medical schools sat a battery of psychometric tests to measure cognitive ability, personality traits and moral/ethical reasoning (Personal Qualities Assessment, PQA). Analysis determined the potential impact of the latter variables, and those of educational background and socioeconomic class (assessed by residential 'deprivation category'), upon success in gaining a place to study medicine. RESULTS: Cognitive ability did not vary significantly as a function of gender or educational background, although there was a trend for it to be lower in individuals from more deprived backgrounds. Women as a group were more empathic, with a greater communitarian orientation, than men. There was no significant difference between individuals attending independent and state-funded schools in respect of any of the qualities measured by the PQA. Applicants from deprived backgrounds and those attending state-funded schools would not be disadvantaged by an admissions process based on the PQA. CONCLUSION: The incorporation of an assessment tool such as the PQA may have positive implications for widening access and the objective selection of suitable medical students, resulting in the training of doctors who are more representative of the community at large. A longterm follow-up of the professional careers of those medical students who completed the PQA will be undertaken.     

An assessment of vocational training

A retrospective analysis of the opinions of vocationally trained doctors was obtained from a postal questionnaire. Ninety-eight doctors who had trained in the West of Scotland before the introduction of new criteria in 1985 for the appointment and reappointment of training practices were compared with 107 doctors who had trained following the introduction of the criteria, looking at their rating of training, the frequency of tutorials, value of teaching and research encouragement. There was a significant improvement in the rating of training, frequency of tutorials, research encouragement and enjoyment of training in the group who trained after the new criteria were adopted. The study demonstrates the benefits of vocational training for general practice when criteria are set and followed. This training model may be applicable in other branches of medicine.     

Sources of validity evidence for an internal medicine student evaluation system: an evaluative study of assessment methods

Background  Medical students' final clinical grades in internal medicine are based on the results of multiple assessments that reflect not only the students' knowledge, but also their skills and attitudes.
Objective  To examine the sources of validity evidence for internal medicine final assessment results comprising scores from 3 evaluations and 2 examinations.
Methods  The final assessment scores of 8 cohorts of Year 4 medical students in a 6-year undergraduate programme were analysed. The final assessment scores consisted of scores in ward evaluations (WEs), preceptor evaluations (PREs), outpatient clinic evaluations (OPCs), general knowledge and problem-solving multiple-choice questions (MCQs), and objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Sources of validity evidence examined were content, response process, internal structure, relationship to other variables, and consequences.
Results  The median generalisability coefficient of the OSCEs was 0.62. The internal consistency reliability of the MCQs was 0.84. Scores for OSCEs correlated well with WE, PRE and MCQ scores with observed (disattenuated) correlation of 0.36 (0.77), 0.33 (0.71) and 0.48 (0.69), respectively. Scores for WEs and PREs correlated better with OSCE than MCQ scores. Sources of validity evidence including content, response process, internal structure and relationship to other variables were shown for most components.
Conclusion  There is sufficient validity evidence to support the utilisation of various types of assessment scores for final clinical grades at the end of an internal medicine rotation. Validity evidence should be examined for any final student evaluation system in order to establish the meaningfulness of the student assessment scores.     

A controlled study of the short- and long-term effects of a Train the Trainers course

Objectives  This study aimed to establish the longterm effects of a 3-day 'Training for Trainers' course (TTC) on doctors' knowledge, teaching behaviour and clinical learning climate.
Methods  The study was designed as an intervention study with pre-, post- and long-term measurements. The intervention group (I-group) included 118 doctors from the departments of internal medicine and orthopaedic surgery at one university hospital. The control group (C-group) consisted of 125 doctors from the corresponding departments at another university hospital. Gains in knowledge about teaching skills were assessed by a written test. Teaching behaviour and learning climate were evaluated by questionnaires.
Results  In the I-group, 98.4% of doctors, both specialists and trainees, participated in a TTC. Response rates on the written test varied from 90% at baseline to 70% at 6 months after the intervention. Knowledge about teaching skills increased in the I-group by 25% after the TTC and was sustained at 6 months. Questionnaire response rates varied from 98.4% at baseline to 84.8% at 6 months. Post-course, the teaching behaviour of the I-group significantly changed and its learning climate improved compared with the C-group. Scores for use of feedback and supervision in the I-group increased from 4–5 to 6–7 (maximum score = 9). This was significantly higher than in the C-group.
Conclusions  A 3-day residential TTC has a significant impact in terms of gains of knowledge concerning teaching skills, teaching behaviour and learning climate after 6 months. The positive effects demonstrated in this study were rooted in both the specialists and trainees who attended the course.     

Current status of teaching on spirituality in UK medical schools

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the current status of teaching on spirituality in medicine in UK medical schools and to establish if and how medical schools are preparing future doctors to identify patients' spiritual needs. METHODS: We carried out a national questionnaire survey using a 2-part questionnaire. Section A contained questions relating to the quantity of teaching on spirituality and the topics covered. Section B contained questions relating to teaching on alternative health practices. Medical educators from each of the 32 medical schools in the UK were invited to participate. RESULTS: A response rate of 53% (n = 17) was achieved. A total of 59% (n = 10) of respondents stated that there is teaching on spirituality in medicine in their curricula. On extrapolation, at least 31% and a maximum of 78% of UK medical schools currently provide some form of teaching on spirituality. Of the respondents that teach spirituality, 50% (n = 5) stated that their schools include compulsory teaching on spirituality in medicine, 80% (n = 8) include optional components, and 88% stated that teaching on complementary and alternative medicine is included in the curriculum. CONCLUSIONS: Although 59% (n = 10) of respondent medical schools (the actual UK figure lies between 31% and 78%) currently provide some form of teaching on spirituality, there is significant room for improvement. There is little uniformity between medical schools with regard to content, form, amount or type of staff member delivering the teaching. It would be beneficial to introduce a standardised curriculum on spirituality across all UK medical schools.     

Country report: medical education in France

CONTEXT: The last 10 years have represented a period of significant reform within both the health care and education systems in France. In terms of its workforce, France faces a shortage of doctors, particularly in primary care. METHODS: This paper examines the French medical curriculum, student selection, licensure and continuing medical education and discusses the challenges currently facing French medical faculties. RESULTS: The French medical curriculum is defined nationally, with methods adapted at medical school level. There has been some uptake of innovative methods such as problem-based learning, skills-based teaching and performance-based assessment. However, traditional didactic teaching of scientific medicine and the apprenticeship model remain dominant. France uses a unique method of selection, which is the subject of much debate. Following a general year, medical students are subject to a selection examination that permits only a small number to continue studies. Similarly, at the end of medical school, a written test is used to rank students for the purpose of matching to specialty training. France has no national colleges or licensing authorities and thus authorisation to practise rests on the diploma delivered by each faculty of medicine. From 2005, continuing medical education became compulsory for all doctors. It includes the evaluation of medical practice. CONCLUSIONS: French faculties of medicine face several challenges, including: rising numbers of students without a commensurate growth in the number of faculty members; an increasing emphasis on multidisciplinary health care; a drive towards mandatory continuing education and performance-based outcomes, and the development of national selection examinations that are knowledge-based.     

Clinical exposure during clinical method attachments in general practice

BACKGROUND: There has been a significant decline in medical students' clinical experience in hospitals. Hospital-based teaching is struggling to provide medical students with sufficient experience of the common health problems of our industrialized ageing society. Hence, general practice has become an important locus for medical education. Published evidence, however, that students can access appropriate clinical experience in general practice is sparse. OBJECTIVE: To determine students' clinical exposure during clinical and method attachments based in general practice at two medical schools. EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVE: Students were attached to general practice tutors to learn clinical method in internal medicine. METHOD: General practice tutors from two medical schools collected data on age, gender, diagnoses, symptoms and signs of the patients they invited to teaching sessions. RESULTS: The frequency of diagnoses, symptoms and signs seen by medical students are recorded. Students mostly saw patients with chronic illnesses; the commonest diagnoses were ischaemic heart disease and angina. DISCUSSION: Our study has recorded the largest published database of clinical diagnoses, symptoms and signs encountered by students learning clinical method in general practice. It shows that students obtained a wealth of experience with patients with common chronic diseases. Students must also learn in the hospital setting, to experience the presentation of acute illness. The combination of teaching in these two settings is likely to provide the most effective technique to ensure that students encounter the common, acute and chronic conditions that affect patients in the 21st century.     

The development of medical teachers: an enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers

AIM: The aim of the study was to explore the different ways in which doctors have learned to teach and train. INTRODUCTION: There is no coherent theory of medical teacher development. Doctors are experts in what they teach; most have had little or no training in how they teach. Research has mostly concentrated on the acquisition and improvement of pedagogical skills by attendance at formal, generally short courses. These may have limited impact. METHODS: We carried out semistructured interviews with 10 experienced medical teachers. A review of the literature had suggested areas to explore. Interviews were transcribed and coded and thematic analysis and grounded theory used as the framework for qualitative analysis. RESULTS: Four areas were identified as important in teacher development: acquisition of educational knowledge and skills; modelling and practice of teaching skills; encouragement and motivation of teachers, and constraints on teaching and learning. DISCUSSION: The results suggest a model for teacher development that begins with doctors as learners, learning to learn and watching teachers teach. They then start to teach, acquiring and practising skills, and subsequently move on to reflect on their teaching. They can be encouraged to teach but may also be prevented from teaching. CONCLUSIONS: This inductive study proposes a model for medical teacher development that attempts to explain how doctors learn to teach and train. More research is needed to clarify the findings. There are implications for faculty development.     

Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning?

PURPOSE: At the Faculty of Medicine at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium, we have developed a final examination that consists of extended matching multiple-choice questions. Extended matching questions (EMQs) originate from a case and have 1 correct answer within a list of at least 7 alternatives. If EMQs assess clinical reasoning, we can assume there will be a difference between the ways students and experienced doctors solve the problems within the questions. This study compared students' and residents' processes of solving EMQs. METHODS: Twenty final year students and 20 fourth or fifth year residents specialising in internal medicine solved 20 EMQs aloud. All questions concerned diagnosis or pathogenesis. Ten EMQs related to internal medicine and 10 questions to other medical disciplines. The session was audio-taped and transcribed. RESULTS: The residents correctly answered significantly more questions concerning internal medicine than did the students. Their reasoning was more "forward" and less "backward". No difference between residents and students was found for the other questions. The residents scored better on internal medicine than on the other questions. They used more backward and less forward reasoning when solving the other questions than they did with the internal medicine questions. The better half of the respondents used significantly more forward and less backward reasoning than did the poorer half. CONCLUSION: In accordance with the literature, medical expertise was characterised by forward reasoning, whereas outside their area of expertise, the subjects switched over to backward reasoning. It is possible to assess processes of clinical reasoning using EMQs.     

Attending doctors' perspectives on how residents learn

CONTEXT: Graduate medical education is currently facing major educational reforms. There is a lack of empirical evidence in the literature about the learning processes of residents in the clinical workplace. This qualitative study uses a 'grounded theory' approach to continue the development of a theoretical framework of learning in the clinical workplace by adding the perspective of attending doctors. METHODS: A total of 21 Dutch attending doctors involved in the training of residents in obstetrics and gynaecology participated in 1 of 3 focus group sessions. They discussed their perceptions of how residents learn and what factors influence residents' learning. A grounded theory approach was used to analyse the transcribed discussions. RESULTS: Three related themes emerged. The first concerned the central role of participation in work-related activities: according to attending doctors, residents learn by tackling the everyday challenges of clinical work. The second involved the ways in which attending doctors influence what residents learn from work-related activities. The final theme focused on attending doctors' views of the essential characteristics of residents and their development during residency. CONCLUSIONS: Attending doctors' perspectives complement current insights derived from similar research among residents and from related literature. As part of an ongoing effort to further develop understanding of how residents learn, this study adds several ways in which attending doctors strive to combine guidance in both patient care and resident training. Furthermore, attending doctors' perspectives draw attention to other aspects of learning in the clinical workplace, such as the role of confidence and the balance between supervision and independence.