Surgical treatment for colorectal liver metastases involving the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe

BACKGROUND: Hepatic neoplasms in the paracaval portion of the caudate lobe (S1r) are usually difficult to treat surgically because such neoplasms often invade the hepatic veins and/or inferior vena cava (IVC). We reevaluated resected cases of colorectal liver metastases involving S1r to confirm the significance of aggressive surgical treatments. METHODS: Between July 1977 and December 2002, 95 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases underwent hepatic resection. Seven patients with liver metastases involving the S1r underwent resection. RESULTS: The surgical procedures for liver metastases comprised 3 isolated caudate lobectomies, 2 right hepatectomies, and 2 right hepatic trisectionectomies with caudate lobectomy. Combined resections included partial resection of the hepatic vein in 2 patients, wedge resection of the IVC in 3, and segmental resection of the IVC in 1. Six of the 7 patients with S1r metastasis had recurrent disease in liver and/or lung. A second hepatectomy was carried out in 4 patients and a partial lung resection in 2 patients. Four of the 7 patients survived more than 5 years, but 2 of them died of recurrent disease at 61 and 95 months after initial hepatectomy. The remaining 2 patients are alive 72 and 118 months without any sign of recurrence. The median survival time of the 7 patients was 60 months. CONCLUSION: Liver metastases involving the S1r could be resected radically with en bloc resection of the major hepatic veins and/or the inferior vena cava. An aggressive surgical approach with combined resection of the adjacent major vessels may offer a better chance of long-term survival in selected patients with caudate lobe metastasis from colorectal cancer.     

Ex vivo and in situ resection of inferior vena cava with hepatectomy for colorectal metastases

OBJECTIVE: To describe the surgical techniques and early results of inferior vena cava (IVC) resection in patients with advanced liver tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the IVC by hepatic tumors, although rare, is considered inoperable by standard resection techniques. Concomitant hepatic and IVC resection is required to achieve adequate tumor clearance. METHODS: Between February 1995 and February 1999, 158 patients underwent hepatic resection for colorectal metastases in the authors' unit. Eight patients, aged 42 to 80 years (mean 62 years), with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer underwent concomitant resection of the IVC and four to six hepatic segments. Resections were carried out under total hepatic vascular exclusion in four patients and ex vivo in four patients. Between 30 degrees and 360 degrees of the retrohepatic IVC was resected and replaced with an autogenous vein patch (n = 1), a ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (n = 2), a Dacron tube graft (n = 1), or a patch (n = 3) or was repaired by primary suturing (n = 1). RESULTS: There were two early deaths from multiple organ failure. One patient survived 30 months after ex vivo resection but died of renal cell carcinoma, and another died with recurrent disease at 9 months. The remaining four patients remained alive 5 to 12 months after surgery, with no hepatic failure or venous obstruction; tumor recurrence was present in two. Nonthrombotic occlusion of the neocava occurred in one patient and was stented successfully. CONCLUSIONS: Although concomitant hepatic and IVC resection is associated with a considerable surgical risk, this aggressive surgical approach offers hope for patients with hepatic tumors involving the IVC, who would otherwise have a dismal prognosis. This procedure can be performed under total hepatic vascular exclusion, with or without venovenous bypass, and by ex vivo bench resection.     

Survival after resection of multiple bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To define the long-term outcome and treatment complications for patients undergoing liver resection for multiple, bilobar hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 165 consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer was performed. Patients were divided into a simple hepatic metastasis group, consisting of patients with three or fewer metastases in a unilobar distribution, and a complex hepatic metastases group, consisting of patients with four or more unilobar metastases or at least two bilobar metastases. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate was 36% for the simple group and 37% for the complex group. Multivariate analysis revealed that the number of hepatic segments involved by tumor and the maximum diameter of the largest metastasis correlated significantly with the 5-year survival rate. The surgical death rate was 4.9% for the simple group and 9.1% for the complex group; this difference was not significant. Multivariate analysis revealed that extended lobar resection and concomitant colon and hepatic resection were significant and independent predictors of surgical death. The combination of extended lobar resection and concomitant colon resection was used significantly more frequently in the complex group than in the simple group. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of complex hepatic metastases, as defined in this study, results in a 5-year survival rate of 37% and confers the same survival benefit as does resection of limited hepatic metastases. The surgical death rate for this aggressive approach is significantly higher if extended lobar resections are necessary and if concomitant colorectal resection is performed. Patients who have complex hepatic metastases at the time of diagnosis of the primary colorectal cancer and who would require extended hepatic lobectomy should have hepatic resection delayed for at least 3 months after colon resection.     

Laparoscopic-Assisted Combined Colon and Liver Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer with Synchronous Liver Metastases: Initial Experience

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic approaches have become increasingly used in selected patients with either colorectal or liver cancer. However, the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection in primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine the feasibility of laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection for primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases. METHODS: Laparoscopic surgery involving intestinal anastomosis was performed for primary colorectal cancer. The liver was then mobilized with the assistance of a hand inserted through the upper midline incision. For minor resections, the parenchymal transection was performed laparoscopically. For major resection involving a hilar dissection, transection was performed according to the standard open techniques under direct vision through the incision. Resected specimens were retrieved directly through the midline incision. RESULTS: Ten patients with primary colorectal cancer and synchronous liver metastases underwent the above procedure between September 2006 and April 2007. Surgical procedures for colorectal cancer included 5 low anterior resections, 3 anterior resections, 1 right hemicolectomy, and 1 subtotal colectomy. Combined hepatic surgery included 6 major hepatectomies, 3 segmentectomies, and 1 tumorectomy. All procedures were successful, with no conversions to open surgery required. The median operation time was 439 min (range: 210-690 min), and the median estimated blood loss was 350 ml (range: 300-1,200 ml). There was no surgical mortality or major morbidity, except in one patient in whom postoperative bleeding at the site of para-aortic node dissection was promptly controlled. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic-assisted combined colon and liver resection is a feasible and safe procedure for the treatment of primary colorectal cancer with synchronous liver metastases.     

Excisional surgery of hepatic metastases of colorectal adenocarcinoma

Between 1981 and 1985, 39 patients had hepatic resection for colorectal cancer liver metastases 44 operations (5 iteratives resections) were performed with 33 major hepatectomy. There was no mortality. Long term results showed: a one year 53% survival, a two years 23% survival, a three years 11% survival. 28 patients had recurrences; 15 of these 28 had hepatic recurrences. According to recent literature the high level of hepatic recurrence suggest that surgical resection should be accompanied with regional chemotherapy.     

Sequence of colorectal and liver resection in patients with surgically-treatable stage IV colorectal cancer

Approximately 25-30% of patients with colorectal cancer develop hepatic metastases. For patients diagnosed with resectable colorectal hepatic metastases, variation exists regarding the timing of resection of the colorectal primary and the hepatic metastases including three approaches: (1) the “classical” colorectal-first staged approach, (2) the “combined” or simultaneous/synchronous approach, and (3) the “reverse” or liver-first staged approach. The purpose of this chapter is to review the current literature regarding the timing of colorectal and hepatic resection in patients with surgically treatable colorectal adenocarcinoma hepatic metastases. There are inadequate data at the current time to provide definitive recommendations as to the optimal timing and sequence of surgery. Our recommendations based on existing data favor delivery of neoadjuvant therapy followed by either: (1) the combined approach for low-risk resections, (2) the liver-first staged strategy for high-risk hepatic resections or mid- to distal rectal tumors that may benefit from total neoadjuvant therapy, or (3) the colorectal-first approach for symptomatic primary colon tumors.     

Surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer

We analyze our experience over a 10-year period in the surgical treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Between 01.01.1995 and 08.31.2005 189 liver resections were performed in 171 patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (16 re-resections - 2 in the same patient and a "two-stage" liver resection in 2 patients). In our series there were 83 patients with synchronous liver metastases (69 simultaneous resections, 12 delayed resections and 2 "two-stage" liver resection were performed) and 88 metachronous liver metastases. Almost all types of liver resections have been performed. The morbidity and mortality rates were 17.4% and 4.7%, respectively. Median survival was 28.5 months and actuarial survival at 1-, 3- and 5-year was 78.7%, 40.4% and 32.7%, respectively. Between January 2002 and August 2005 hyperthermic ablation of colorectal cancer liver metastases has been performed in 6 patients; in other 5 patients with multiple bilobar liver metastases liver resection was associated with radiofrequency ablation and one patient underwent only radiofrequency ablation for recurrent liver metastasis. In conclusion, although the treatment of colorectal cancer liver metastases is multimodal (resection, ablation, chemotherapy and radiation therapy), liver resection is the only potential curative treatment. The quality and volume of remnant liver parenchyma is the only limitation of liver resection. The morbidity, mortality and survival rates after simultaneous liver and colorectal resection are similar with those achieved by delayed resection. Postoperative outcome of patients with major hepatic resection is correlated with the surgical team experience. The long-term survival was increased using the new multimodal treatment schemes.     

Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Tumors From Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical results and clinicopathologic features of hepatic metastases from gastric adenocarcinoma to identify patients with a better probability of survival. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Many studies have reported the benefit of hepatic resection for metastatic tumors from colorectal cancer. However, indications for a surgical approach for gastric adenocarcinoma involving the liver have not been clearly defined. METHODS: Ninety (11%) of 807 patients with primary gastric cancer were diagnosed with synchronous (n = 78) or metachronous (n = 12) hepatic metastases. Of these, 19 underwent 20 resections intended to cure the metastatic lesion in the liver. The clinicopathologic features of the hepatic metastases in, and the surgical results for, the 19 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: The actuarial 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates after hepatic resection were, respectively, 77%, 34%, and 34%, and three patients survived for more than 5 years after surgery. Solitary and metachronous metastases were significant determinants for a favorable prognosis after hepatic resection. Pathologically, a fibrous pseudocapsule between the tumor and surrounding hepatic parenchyma was found in 13 of the 19 patients (68%). The presence of a peritumoral fibrous pseudocapsule and a well-differentiated histologic type of metastatic nodule were significant prognostic factors. Factors associated with the primary lesion were not significant prognostic determinants in patients who underwent curative resection of the primary cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Solitary and metachronous metastases from gastric cancer should be treated by a surgical approach and confer a better prognosis. A new prognostic factor, the presence of a pseudocapsule, may be helpful in defining indications for postoperative adjuvant treatment.     

结直肠癌肝转移的外科治疗

目的　探讨结、直肠癌肝转移的外科治疗。方法　对１９９３ 年１ 月至１９９９ 年１ 月的１９ 例结、直肠癌肝转移患者行外科治疗。其中６ 例同期切除,１０ 例分期切除,１ 例肝动脉结扎加无水乙醇注射,２ 例通过肝动脉结扎加化学药物治疗（化疗） 泵灌注化疗而获得二期手术切除机会。手术方式行肝不规则楔形切除１６ 例,左半肝切除２ 例。结果　术后１、３、５ 年生存率分别为８９％ 、５８％ 、２１％ 。６ 例同期肝切除者平均生存期２３ 个月,１０ 例分期肝切除者的平均生存期为３２ 个月。结论　掌握手术时机和适应证,积极进行肝动脉灌注化疗,提高手术切除成功率是提高存活率的关键。     

Hepatic resection with reconstruction of the inferior vena cava or hepatic venous confluence for metastatic liver tumor from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Resection of colorectal liver metastases infiltrating the inferior vena cava (IVC) or hepatic venous confluence (HVC) is technically feasible, but the procedure frequently involves invasive techniques, and its long-term outcome has not yet been fully described. STUDY DESIGN: From October 1994 through June 2001, 87 patients underwent first curative hepatic resections for colorectal metastases. Nine patients (the IVC/HVC group) received hepatectomy combined with IVC or HVC reconstruction. Clinicopathologic characteristics, surgical results, and patient survival were investigated and compared with those of the remaining 78 patients (the comparison group). RESULTS: Three IVCs and eight hepatic veins were successfully resected and reconstructed by primary closure (n = 3), direct anastomosis (n = 1), or by the use of autologous vein grafts (n = 7). A comparison between the two groups revealed that the primary colorectal tumor stage was similar, but the IVC/HVC group had more (median 4 versus 2, p < 0.05) and larger (median 5.0 versus 3.2 cm, p < 0.05) lesions. The IVC/HVC group required longer operating times (median 600 versus 320 minutes, p < 0.001) and suffered greater blood loss (median 1,034 versus 434 g, p < 0.01) and more extensive liver parenchyma resection (median 585 versus 155 g, p < 0.001). Patients in the IVC/HVC group had a shorter survival time (median survival time 25.8 versus 44.0 months, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection combined with the IVC or HVC reconstruction for colorectal liver metastases can be performed with acceptable morbidity, and possibly with no mortality. Although no definite conclusion on long-term survival can be drawn from our study, given the limited number of patients, their overall survival was unsatisfactory. Further studies are needed to clarify the contribution of combined resection and reconstruction of IVC/HVC to long-term survival, because surgical resection currently provides the only hope of cure.     

Resection of the inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy.

Involvement of the inferior vena cava (IVC) by hepatic tumors, although uncommon, is considered to be unresectable by standard surgical techniques. Recent advances in hepatic surgery have made combined hepatic and vena caval resection possible. The purpose of this study is to describe the surgical techniques and early results of combined resection of the liver and IVC. From 1997 to 2000, 11 patients underwent resection of the IVC along with four to seven liver segments. Resections were carried out for hepatocellular carcinoma (four); colorectal metastases (four); and hepatoblastoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor metastases, and squamous cell carcinoma in one patient each. Ex vivo procedures were performed twice, and total vascular isolation was used in the nine other cases. The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (five), primarily (five), or with Gore-Tex patches (one). There were two early deaths: one from liver failure at 3 weeks and one from sepsis secondary to a perforated segment of small bowel 4 months postresection. One patient with a gastrointestinal stromal tumor died at 32 months of recurrent tumor and one patient with hepatocellular carcinoma is alive with recurrent tumor at 16 months. The remaining patients are alive and disease free with follow-up ranging from 3 to 40 months without evidence of IVC occlusion. Combined resection of the liver and IVC is a formidable undertaking with substantial surgical risk. However, this aggressive surgical approach offers a chance for cure in patients with tumors involving the IVC that would otherwise have a dismal prognosis.     

Increased use of parenchymal-sparing surgery for bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer is associated with improved mortality without change in oncologic outcome: trends in treatment over time in 440 patients

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the results of liver resection for patients with bilateral hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the evolution of the technical approach over time and correlations with morbidity, mortality, and oncologic outcome. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although hepatic resection for isolated colorectal metastases to the liver is thought to be beneficial when feasible, resection of bilateral liver metastases carries unique technical issues and is often associated with more aggressive tumor biology. Little has been written specifically about the results achieved in this subset of patients. METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing hepatic resection at a single institution over an 11-year time period were reviewed. RESULTS: Resection of bilateral liver metastases from colorectal cancer was accomplished in 443 cases (440 patients) with a 29% incidence of major complications and a 5.4% 90-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year disease-specific survival was 30% and 5-year recurrence-free survival was 18%. Operative technique changed over time toward a parenchymal-sparing approach as evidenced by the greater use of multiple simultaneous liver resections, wedge resections, and ablations. Similarly, there was a decrease in the use of major hepatectomies. This correlated with decreased mortality without change in disease-specific survival or liver recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Resection of bilateral colorectal liver metastases can be accomplished with acceptable morbidity, mortality, and oncologic results. Increased use of a parenchymal-sparing approach is associated with decreased mortality without compromise in cancer-related outcome.     

Staged pulmonary and hepatic metastasectomy in colorectal cancer--is it worth it?

OBJECTIVES: Resection of isolated pulmonary and hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer can offer potential cure. However, little data is available to determine the results of staged hepatic and pulmonary resections in the same patient. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent staged hepatic and pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer in our institute from September 1998 to May 2002. Probability of survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-three metastasectomies (seven redo) were carried out in 26 patients. There were 19 male and 7 female patients with a mean age of 61 years (range 34-76 years). The mean disease-free interval for hepatic and pulmonary resection was 21.8 and 23.9 months, respectively. Sternotomy, thoracotomy and video assisted thoracoscopic approach were used in 3.03, 72.7 and 24.2% of patients, respectively. Wedge excision, lobectomy and pneumonectomy were carried out in 87.87, 9.09 and 3.03% of cases, respectively. There was one hospital death following acute respiratory failure after pneumonectomy. Mean follow-up was 23.3 months (range 2-71 months). The mean survival after last pulmonary resection was 34.7 months (SE 3.03 and 95% CI of 28.8-40.6). CONCLUSIONS: Our results support aggressive surgical management of pulmonary and hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer.     

Validity of observation interval for synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer: changes in hepatic and extrahepatic metastatic foci

Background In cases of synchronous colorectal hepatic metastases, the primary colorectal cancer maintains a strong influence on the metastases, so the possibility of occult hepatic and extrahepatic metastases must be kept in mind. Our treatment policy has been to reevaluate the metastases at an interval of 3 months after colorectal resection and determine treatment strategy. We examined the validity of observation interval for synchronous hepatic metastases. Materials and methods The treatment course was investigated for 36 patients with no extrahepatic lesion remnants at colorectal surgery and a simultaneously resectable liver (H1 group). Results In the H1 group, eight patients underwent simultaneous colorectal and hepatic resections, while the treatment course for 28 patients was decided after an interval. Hepatic resection was not indicated in nine of the 28 patients during the interval. New lesions appeared during the interval in seven of 19 interval hepatic resection patients. In 16 (57%) of 28 interval patients, there was a change in the hepatic resection procedure or surgical indications. Conclusion Reevaluation after an observation interval allows accurate understanding of the number and location of hepatic metastases and is beneficial in determining candidates for surgery and in selecting treatment plan.     

Aggressive surgical approach to recurrent tumors after hepatectomy for metastatic spread of colorectal cancer to the liver

BACKGROUND: Liver resection is currently accepted as the only potential cure for patients with metastases of colorectal tumors in the liver. However, cancer will recur in more than 70% of patients. METHODS: In the 7 years to December 1997, 60 patients underwent liver resections for colorectal metastases at our institute. Of these, 20 patients had repeated surgical resections for recurrent disease of the liver and other organs. Another 2 patients had undergone previous hepatectomy elsewhere. The clinical data for these patients were reviewed. RESULTS: The median interval between the 2 resections was 16 months. Eighteen hepatectomies, 6 lung resections, and 1 pancreatoduodenectomy were performed in 22 patients. Operative mortality and complication rates were 0% and 18%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 25 months after repeated resection, the survival rate in these patients was 73% at 2 years (12 of 16 evaluable patients are surviving) and 22% at 5 years (2 of 10 evaluable patients are surviving); the median survival time was 44 months. CONCLUSIONS: Repeated resections for recurrent colorectal metastases yield comparable results to first liver resections in operative mortality and morbidity rates, survival time, and pattern of recurrence. Although the number of patients surviving more than 5 years is still limited, the absence of other proven treatments supports the concept of an aggressive resectional approach for these patients.     

Pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer: 25 years of experience.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the experience of pulmonary resections for colorectal metastases at the McGill University Health Centre. DESIGN: A chart review. PATIENTS: Forty-nine patients treated surgically between 1975 and 1998 for pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancer. INTERVENTION: Thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival of patients with various preoperative and post operative clinical variables. RESULTS: The perioperative death rate was 4%. Overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 55% and 40% respectively. The mean interval between the initial colonic resection and resection of pulmonary metastases (discase-free interval) was 36 months. The 7 patients who also under went resection of extrapulmonary metastases had a 5-year survival rate of 52%. Significant preoperative variables that carried a poor prognosis included the following: more than one pulmonary lesion, a disease-free interval of less than 2 years, and moderately or poorly differentiated colorectal cancer. The 16 patients who received chemotherapy after their thoracotomy had a 5-year survival rate of 51% compared with 54% for the 33 patients who did not receive chemotherapy. Recurrent resections of pulmonary lesions did not reduce survival. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary resection for metastatic colorectal cancer is both effective and safe. Resectable extrapulmonary metastases and pulmonary recurrence should not preclude lung resection. Postoperative chemotherapy has no survival benefit. Preoperative variables should guide the clinician when considering surgical intervention.     

combined hepatic and inferior vena cava resection for colorectal metastases

Surgical resection continues to offer the only hope for cure of colorectal cancer metastatic to the liver. Tumor involvement of the vena cava is often viewed as a contraindication to surgical resection. Whereas proven technically feasible, the survival advantages of en bloc liver and vena cava resection remain unclear. We reviewed all patients at a tertiary care center who had resection of colorectal liver metastases, including those with vena cava resections. Eleven patients had en bloc liver and vena cava resection between 1988 and 2002; during the same time period, 97 patients underwent isolated liver resection. There were no perioperative deaths in the 11 patients. All resections had negative histological margins. Mean follow-up was 33 months from the date of surgery. Median disease-free survival of the group having caval resections was 9 months, whereas median survival was 34 months. When compared to the cohort of isolated hepatic resections, the group undergoing caval resections experienced a significantly reduced diseasefree survival of 18.6 vs. 9.1 months, respectively (P = 0.03); however, there was no difference in overall survival between the two groups at 55.2 vs. 34.3 months, respectively (P = 0.20). Colorectal liver metastases involving the vena cava should be considered for surgical resection. Presented at the 2005 American Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association Congress, Hollywood, Florida, April 14–17, 2005.     

Liver resection for colorectal metastases

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the second commonest malignancy in the UK. Metastases to the liver occur in greater than 50% of patients and remain the biggest determinant of outcome in these patients. Liver resection is a safe procedure that achieves good long-term survival, but surgery has traditionally been limited to select groups of patients. The improved outcome suggests that more patients could benefit from resection if more was known of what criteria are predictive of a good outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients undergoing surgical resection of the liver for colorectal metastases between March 1989 and March 2001 in the Birmingham Liver Unit. RESULTS: During this period, 212 liver resections for colorectal cancer metastases were performed in 82 females and 130 males. The median follow-up was 16 months with an overall actuarial survival of 86% at 1 year, 54% at 3 years, and 28% at 5 years. The peri-operative mortality was 2.8%. The number and timing (metachronous or synchronous) of metastatic lesions, the gender of the patient, pathological staging of the primary lesion or surgical resection margins had no significant influence on survival. Patients with lesions less than 5 cm in size had a significantly prolonged survival compared with patients with lesions greater than 5 cm in size (P < 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Liver resection is the only curative treatment for patients with colorectal metastases. The long-term survival reported in patients with resected colorectal metastases confined to the liver is comparable to primary surgery for solid gastrointestinal tumours. Every attempt must be made to increase the availability of liver resection to patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.     

Combined resection of the liver and inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to review the results of combined resection of the liver and inferior vena cava for hepatic malignancy. The morbidity and mortality along with preliminary survival data are assessed in order to determine the utility of this aggressive approach to otherwise unresectable tumors. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Involvement of the inferior vena cava has traditionally been considered a contraindication to resection for advanced tumors of the liver because the surgical risks are high and the long-term prognosis is poor. Progress in liver surgery allows resection in some cases. METHODS: Twenty-two patients undergoing hepatic resection from 1997 to 2003, that also required resection and reconstruction of the inferior vena cava (IVC), were reviewed. The median age was 49 years (range 2 to 68 years). Resections were carried out for: hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), colorectal metastases (n = 6), cholangiocarcinoma (n = 5), gastrointestinal stromal tumor (n = 2), hepatoblastoma (n = 2), and squamous cell carcinoma in 1 patient. Liver resections performed included 13 right trisegmentectomies, 6 right lobectomies extended to include the caudate lobe, and 3 left trisegmentectomies. Complex ex vivo procedures were performed in 2 cases using venovenous bypass while the other 20 cases were performed using varying degrees of vascular isolation. In situ cold perfusion of the liver was used in 1 case. The IVC was reconstructed with ringed Gore-Tex tube graft (n = 14), primarily (n = 6), or with Gore-Tex patches (n = 2). RESULTS: There were 2 perioperative deaths (9%). One cirrhotic patient died of liver failure 3 weeks post operatively and 1 patient with cholangiocarcinoma died of pulmonary hemorrhage secondary to a cavitating pulmonary infection after aspiration pneumonia 6 weeks after resection. Six patients had evidence of postoperative liver failure that resolved with supportive management and 2 patients required temporary dialysis. All vascular reconstructions were patent at last follow-up. With median follow-up of 26 months, 5 patients have died of recurrent malignancy at 44, 40, 32, 26, and 24 months, while an additional patient is alive with disease at 31 months. Actuarial 1-, 3-, and 5-year survivals were 85%, 60%, and 33%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: IVC involvement by hepatic malignancy does not necessarily preclude resection. Liver resection with reconstruction of the inferior vena cava can be performed in selected cases. The increased risk associated with the procedure appears to be balanced by the possible benefits, particularly when the lack of alternative curative approaches is considered.     

Surgical strategy in the treatment of synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancers. Analysis of a series of 59 operated on patients]

AIM OF THE STUDY: The surgical strategy for the treatment of resectable synchronous hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer remains controversial. The retrospective analysis of our series of resectable synchronous hepatic metastases is focused on the percentage of simultaneous resections, the circumstances, the indications, and the results of the one-step procedure compared to the two-step strategy. METHODS: From January 1st 1982 to December 31st 1996, 146 patients were operated on for resection of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer. Fifty-nine (40%) presented with synchronous metastases, 28 (47.5%) of whom underwent simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and of the hepatic metastases (simultaneous resection group: SR). For the other 31 patients (52.5%), the hepatic resection was delayed for a mean interval of 6 +/- 4 months (delayed resection group: DR). RESULTS: The mean age in the two groups was not significantly different (56 years vs. 60 years). The need for blood transfusion and the volume required were not significantly different between the two groups. The duration of each surgical operation was comparable between the two groups (320 +/- 76 min vs. 308 +/- 88 min). Postoperative complications were observed in 18% of patients in the SR group and in 16% of patients in the DR group (no significant difference). There was no postoperative mortality in either group. Survival was 86, 63 and 43% at 1, 2, 3 years respectively in the SR group, and 81, 51 and 36% in the DR group, with no significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous resection of the primary tumor and the hepatic metastases does not increase neither mortality nor morbidity in our series. The best candidate for a one-step procedure is a patient with a right colonic tumor, in a good status, with liver synchronous metastases resectable by mean of a minor hepatectomy.