An evaluation of the Periotest system. Part II: Reliability and repeatability of instruments. Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (Planning Committee).

Investigators involved in a clinical study on dental implants being conducted by the Dental Implant Clinical Research Group participated in a two-part in vitro evaluation of the Periotest system. The first part involved each of 35 investigators taking three readings for each of 16 models designed to simulate an implant in place in the oral cavity and to cover most of the effective measuring range of the instrument. The second part, with which this article is concerned, was conducted by three study investigators to determine the level of agreement in readings for six different Periotest instruments. Readings were taken according to the manufacturer's instructions until two coincident readings were obtained. The readings were compared to evaluate inter- and intrainstrument reliability. Instrument repeatability was evaluated by examining the number of attempts required to obtain the two coincident readings. The Periotest system generally demonstrated a high degree of repeatability and reliability, with higher variability associated with specific model samples.     

Evaluation of the interprobe electronic periodontal probe.

The Interprobe is designed to provide measurements of pocket depths and attachment loss. Investigators involved in a clinical study on dental implants being conducted by the Dental Implant Clinical Research Group participated in an in vitro evaluation of the variability of repeated measurements made with the Interprobe. Measurements were made on holes drilled to predetermined depths in metal blocks. Three readings by investigators for each of nine test holes were in agreement 75.2 percent of the time. At least two of three readings were in agreement in 98.1 percent of the attempts. Either two of three or three of three readings were within 0.5 mm of the actual depth of the holes over 99 percent of the time. No correlation was noted for accuracy of measurements with hole depth or present clinical duties of the investigators. Although slight initial improvement in measurement accuracy was observed, it was not statistically significant in time over the three measurement sequence.     

The influence of preoperative antibiotics on success of endosseous implants at 36 months

The benefits of prophylactic antibiotics are well recognized in dentistry. However, their routine use in the placement of endosseous dental implants remains controversial. As part of the comprehensive Dental Implant Clinical Research Group (DICRG) clinical implant study, the preoperative or postoperative use of antibiotics, the type used, and the duration of coverage were left to the discretion of the surgeon. These data for 2,973 implants were recorded and correlated with failure of osseointegration during healing (Stage 1), at surgical uncovering (Stage 2), before loading the prosthesis (Stage 3), and from prosthesis loading to 36 months (Stage 4). The results showed a significantly higher survival rate at each stage of treatment in patients who had received preoperative antibiotics.     

Stability of implants and natural teeth as determined by the Periotest over 60 months of function

Various methods for evaluating tooth mobility have been developed throughout the years, but their acceptance has been limited because of the subjectivity associated with their use. In recent years, the Periotest has been studied and used to evaluate the mobility of natural teeth and is claimed to b e potentially reliable in assessing the stability of the implant-bone interface. Few clinical implant studies have used natural teeth as controls to monitor changes in mobility associated with dental implants. The Dental Implant Clinical Research Group initiated a long-term clinical study in 1991 to assess the influence of design, application, and site of placement on clinical success and crestal bone height. As part of the study, Periotest values (PTVs) were recorded for 2,623 of the 2,998 implants placed and uncovered. For the statistical analysis, 2,623 implants were tested at second-stage surgery, with the number of implants tested varying at each follow-up visit. Data were collected from investigators at 32 study centers for periods ranging up to 60 months. A total of 975 natural teeth from 409 partially edentulous study subjects served as controls. FPVs on natural teeth and implants were combined, and the overall average Periotest values (OA-PTVs) were compared with values for individual subjects. The effect of implant and natural tooth locations on mobility were evaluated and compared with each other. The combined OA-PTV for all natural teeth was +1.8 and the OA-PTV for all implants was -3.4 PTVs. Compared with those in the maxillae, mandibular teeth and implants were found to be more stable Implants were found to be significantly more stable as compared with natural teeth. The recorded variations in PTVs for natural teeth and implants over the entire evaluation period were not found to be significantly different. This study developed the following conclusions: (1) implants were found to be significantly less mobile as compared with natural teeth for individual subjects; (2) the PTVs for natural teeth and implants did not exhibit significant variation over the evaluation period; (3) the Periotest can provide reproducible assessment of stability in a long-term clinical study; and (4) changes in PTVs may be helpful in evaluating improvement or degradation of the implant-bone complex.     

Comparison of Implant Stability Before Prosthetic Loading of Two Dental Implant Systems

Dental implantology is the state of the art technique to replace missing teeth. Implant stability of implant jeopardizes its longevity and success of treatment. This study evaluates the implant stability of implant before and after 4 months of the implant placement, but before prosthetically loading it. Ten two-stage implants of Life care and Nobel Biocare dental implants were placed in 20 patients. Digital OPG was taken on the day of implant placement. After 4 months, at the time of second stage surgery, the implant stability was evaluated by the Periotest instrument. Four months after the implant placement, Periotest evaluation showed a mean of 1.9, which indicated that implants were well osseointegrated and stable. Even before prosthetically loading the two-stage implant, crestal bone loss of 0.6–0.9 mm occurred around the implant. The smooth polished collar design of the implant may have contributed to crestal bone loss.     

Implant surface coating and bone quality-related survival outcomes through 36 months post-placement of root-form endosseous dental implants

Survival rates from placement to 36 months were reported for the ongoing Dental Implant Clinical Research Group studies of root-form endosseous dental implants. Failure rates for all implants were similar in bone qualities 1 and 2 (6.2% and 6.7%, respectively) and slightly higher in bone qualities 3 and 4 (8.5% and 8.7%, respectively). Hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants had an overall failure rate of 3.9% over 36 months in all bone qualities combined, while non-coated implants had a 13.4% failure rate for the same parameters. For each bone quality, there was a significant difference in implant survival for the non-coated implants (P < 0.01). The highest failure rates for non-coated implants were in bone qualities 3 and 4 (19.1% and 25.5%, respectively). No major difference in survival was found for HA-coated implants placed in each bone quality. Possible reasons for the differences in survival are discussed.     

Dental implants in reconstructed jaws: implant longevity and peri-implant tissue outcomes.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to evaluate the clinical status and survival of dental implants inserted in reconstructed jaws, with particular reference to the peri-implant tissues. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a clinical follow-up study based on 29 rehabilitated patients after oral tumor surgery, who received autogenous bone grafts from the ilium and endosseous implants (14 maxillary and 15 mandibular cases; 140 implants) for functional jaw reconstruction between 1988 and 1999. Clinical records of the patients were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical parameters of plaque index, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing were assessed around the implants and control teeth at 4 locations (mesiobuccal, distobuccal, mesiolingual, and distolingual). Implant mobility was assessed clinically and objectively using a Periotest (Gulden; Siemens, Bensheim, Germany) equipment for those implants supporting removable prostheses. Radiographically, the proportion of implant length remained osseointegrated was measured. RESULTS: With a mean follow-up time of 50 months, 90.7% of the 140 implants placed were functional in supporting dental prostheses; 4.3% of implants failed in osseointegration and the remaining 5.0% implants were osseointegrated but nonfunctional. A total of 493 sites of 127 functional implants and 392 sites of 98 control teeth were assessed. No significant difference was found between the implants and control teeth parameters, except on the probing pocket depth. The mean peri-implant probing depth was 3.5 mm, and 52.7% of the measured sites were 3 mm or less. More than one third of the implants (35.9%) presented with increased probing depth (> or =4 mm), and this was significantly higher than in the control teeth (P <.001, chi(2) test). Bleeding on probing was found in 19.3% of the measured peri-implant sites, corresponding to 42.2% of the dental implants. Of the implants, 28.9% were completely free from plaque and 9.4% show visible plaque accumulation. Mobility assessment was feasible on 32 implants and no mobility was detected. Radiographically, the mean implant length remained in bone was 81.1%, with 82.6% in the maxilla and 79.4% in the mandible. Implant survival rate calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method was 86.9% for 5 years. Based on the defined criteria, the success rate of implants placed in reconstructed jaws in this study was 90.7%. CONCLUSION: Endosseous implants can be successfully placed in reconstructed jaws for oral rehabilitation with maintenance of reasonable health status of the peri-implant tissues in the long-term.     

Bone density: its influence on implant stability after uncovering

Primary implant stability and bone density are variables that have long been considered to be essential to achieving predictable osseointegration and long-term clinical survival. Although the dentist can control most factors associated with implant survival, bone density is the one factor that cannot be controlled. Measuring implant stability would assist in determining if an implant has integrated and is ready for the fabrication of the final prosthesis. Changes in implant stability in each type of Bone Quality (BQ-1, -2, -3, and -4), which may occur with time, have not been studied. Such information could help identify well-integrated implants and identify changes associated with impending implant failure. Several studies have used the Periotest instrument to study implant stability. Use of the Periotest implant stability will be studied during each phase of implant treatment for each bone density, and a range for clinically satisfactory integration will be suggested. Implant stability changes over time, and the changes are different for each bone density as the bone surrounding the nonhydroxyapatite implant becomes denser. This is clearly demonstrated in a postmortem histological specimen. The changes in implant stability (Periotest Values [PTVs]) are more apparent in BQ-1 and BQ-2 bone and less apparent in BQ-3 and BQ-4 bone. The Periotest is capable of providing valuable information concerning favorable or unfavorable changes in the bone-implant interface after uncovering. In addition, it can help identify when an implant is ready to be loaded. A new range of PTVs (-5 to -2) is suggested for monitoring the status of implants. Implants with PTVs more positive than -2 would indicate a bone-implant complex that may be marginal.     

The ankylos endosseous dental implant: assessment of stability up to 18 months with the Periotest

Osseointegration is an ongoing histometric process that may vary during clinical function. The implant must be stable at uncovering, which reflects the status of bone-implant interface. The physiology of bone healing associated with endosseous implants suggests that this process occurs between 8 and 12 months, and Periotest values (PTVs) tend to reflect changes in the stability of the bone-implant interface. Stability generally increases gradually from the time of uncovering to an optimal PTV that occurs at a point close to 12 months. This stable interface must remain intact for long-term clinical survival. Rapid development of this optimal PTV is highly desirable in order to prevent premature overloading of the bone-implant interface. The Ankylos implant is a new screw-type implant design in which the thread pitch and length vary to maximize trabecular bone contact. The purpose of this report is to evaluate to 18 months the stability (PTVs) of this implant design. More than 457 implants were placed and followed for a period of 18 months by the multicentered, multidisciplinary Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG). Implant stability (PTVs) was assessed using the Periotest at abutment connection and at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months after uncovering. The Periotest values for all implants rapidly reached an optimal status between uncovering (-3.1 PTVs) and 3 months (-3.4 PTVs). This rapid increase in stability has not previously been reported for other implant designs. The mandibular arch was more negative (-3.8 PTVs) at uncovering as compared with the PTVs for the maxillary arch (-1.7 PTVs). Negative PTVs were recorded (1) as length and diameter increased, (2) as bone density increased, (3) in certain jaw regions, (4) as the number of implants/case increased, and (5) for implants stabile at placement. The Ankylos screw implant design produced rapid stabilization 3 months after uncovering.     

Electronic monitoring of dental implant osseointegration

BACKGROUND: The methods for evaluating dental implant osseointegration can be limited in their effectiveness. The authors developed a new noninvasive electronic instrument to test implant stability and improve the assessment process. METHODS: Using the new instrument, which was based on impulse testing and fast Fourier transform, or FFT, technology, the authors tested implant stability under real-time clinical conditions. The clinical procedure involved a weekly test of two placed implants, from the first-stage insertion point to the completion of the integration. This longitudinal monitoring spanned eight months. RESULTS: The authors verified clinical implant integration electronically and that it closely matched mathematical predictions. They also observed changes in implant stability during the integration process. CONCLUSIONS: Implant stability can be monitored electronically using FFT testing. A theoretical integration prediction also can be formulated. Like a "dental electrocardiogram," integration is assessed by waveform shape analysis. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Electronic measurement of implant stability may help clinicians noninvasively diagnose the suitability of implants for restoration and aid in postrestorative monitoring.     

AICRG, Part V: Factors influencing implant stability at placement and their influence on survival of Ankylos implants

PROBLEM: Several factors influence primary stabilization of dental implants at placement surgery. These include implant design, bone quality, implant jaw location, and the use of a bone tap. PURPOSE: This report evaluates clinical data gathered by the Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG) to assess (1) the influence of several variables on primary stability and (2) the potential for an Ankylos implant (Friadent GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) that is mobile at placement to integrate and survive for at least 3 years of clinical function. METHODS: The Ankylos implant is a roughened grade-2 titanium screw. A total of 1554 implants were placed in 478 patients. At both the time of placement and abutment connection, the implants were tested for evidence of clinical mobility by attempting to rotate or move the implant with an application of force. Survival was recorded from placement and up to 36 months following placement. RESULTS: At placement, 2.8% were found to be mobile. In the maxillary posterior quadrant, 6.3% were clinically mobile. Implant mobility was frequent (12.2%) in jaw regions with poor-quality bone (BQ-4) or with short implants (8 mm = 8.3% mobile). Of the implants mobile at placement, 97.7% were stable at uncovering. The 3-year postplacement survival of initially mobile implants was 84.1% compared with 96.8% for implants not mobile at placement (chi2 test, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The Ankylos implant predictably promoted primary stability during surgical placement. Poor bone quality, short implants, and maxillary posterior jaw locations were all associated with a slightly higher rate of mobility at placement. Primary implant stability, while highly desirable, is not absolutely necessary for achieving osseointegration of Ankylos     

Pilot clinical and histologic evaluations of a two-piece zirconia implant

An investigation was conducted to evaluate the clinical and histologic results of bone and soft tissue healing around a two-piece zirconia dental implant in a human model. A healthy female patient requiring tooth replacement with dental implants received a two-piece zirconia implant together with conventional titanium implants to be implemented in a prosthesis. Clinical and radiographic evaluations at 6 months revealed stable osseointegrated zirconia and titanium dental implants. Light microscopy and backscatter scanning electron microscopic analyses confirmed the biocompatibility and achievement of osseointegration, in addition to maintenance of the crestal bone level. The findings suggest that the bone-to-implant contact with a zirconia implant surface is sufficient to provide clinical and histologic evidence of osseointegration. The biopsied two-piece zirconia dental implant with platform switching demonstrated osseointegration occlusal to the implant-abutment junction, eliminating the significance of the microgap.     

Possibilities of clinical testing of osseointegration in oral implants

The osseointegration of oral implants is of utmost importance as far as the success of implant prosthetics is concerned. In clinical practice osseointegration can only be tested indirectly. The loading of implants is usually linked to osseointegration as a condition. Under some circumstances implants can be loaded before osseointegration is completed. The present study reviews the various methods of testing osseointegration and the conditions of immediate loading. In the present study the changes in the stability of 59 implants restored with screw-retained superstructures and partly immediately loaded, were observed over a period of several years, with the help of the Periotest method. Based on the statistical evaluation of the results, a significant correlation was found between implant insertion torque and primary stability. A difference was found between the stability of implants in the upper and lower jaws. A typical curve in the temporal changes of implant stability was described.     

Surface Roughness of Dental Implant and Osseointegration

IntroductionDental implants are a usual treatment for the loss of teeth. The success of this therapy is due to the predictability, safety and longevity of the bone–implant interface. Dental implant surface characteristics like roughness, chemical constitution, and mechanical factors can contribute to the early osseointegration. The aim of the present article is to perform a review of the literature on surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration.MethodologyThis work is a narrative review of some aspects of surface roughness of dental implant and osseointegration.ConclusionDespite technological advancement in the biomaterials field, the ideal surface roughness for osseointegration still remains unclear. In this study about surface nanoroughness of dental implant and osseointegration, the clinical relevance is yet unknown. Innovative findings on nanoroughness are valuable in the fields of dental implantology, maxillofacial or orthopedic implant surfaces and also on cardiovascular implants in permanent contact with patient’s blood.     

Evaluation of stability of titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated osseointegrated dental implants: a pilot study

An endosseous implant is described as osseointegrated when it is immobile in function. Objective measures of stability testing have been described. The Periotest is a commercially available device that is used for this purpose. This study was designed to measure stability of endosseous implants placed in the mandible. Implants were placed in the mandibular canine or first premolar area to support an overdenture prosthesis. Stability was evaluated through the use of a Periotest device at the time of implant placement and following one year of functional loading. Implant designs were either a screw-shaped titanium alloy or a hydroxyapatite-coated cylinder. A total of 54 implants were placed, 37 were titanium screw-shaped implants, while the remaining 17 were hydroxyapatite cylinders. Initial measurements of stability showed no difference due to implant type. Following one year of functional loading, titanium screw-shaped implants were more stable than hydroxyapatite implants (P < 0.05). The difference in implant rigidity following a period of functional loading may be an indication of a difference in osseointegration between the two implants used in this study.     

Effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 on the osseointegration of dental implants: a biomechanics study

Background Bone augmentation procedures in combination with dental implants enhance osseointegration in areas that demonstrate localized bone deficit. Clinical confirmation of a biomechanically stable interface is essential for functional implant loading.Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate biomechanically the effect of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP)-2 on implant osseointegration and correlate it with periotest and radiographic measurements.Materials and methods Hollow cylinder implants were filled with absorbable collagen sponge soaked with rhBMP-2 or left empty and implanted in dog mandibles. The animals were followed for 4, 8, and 12 weeks, periotest assessment was performed at the end of each time interval, and specimens were collected for pullout biomechanical testing and radiographic evaluation of bone-implant contact levels.Results Periotest assessment did not provide evidence of statistically significant differences between the two groups and correlated well with the radiographic bone-implant contact levels. The pullout test revealed a higher correlation between force/displacement and displacement/energy for the experimental group, suggesting that the addition of rhBMP-2 did influence the rate of osseointegration.Conclusion The results from the pullout test support the potential role of rhBMP-2 in clinical applications by promoting a biomechanically mature interface at 12 weeks. However, radiographic and periotest assessment of the bone-implant interface did not provide evidence of the differences observed with biomechanical testing.This project is part of a dissertation prepared in partial fulfillment of Dr. Sykaras requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.     

Relationship of implant stability and bone density derived from computerized tomography images

Background and Purpose

Implant stability is one of the most important factors influencing osseointegration. Using stereolithographical guides for maximizing precision, this study aimed at investigating the relationship between implant stability and bone density derived from computerized tomography analysis.

Materials and Methods

One hundred ninety‐five implants were placed in 48 patients using digitally designed stereolithographical surgical guides. Ninety‐five implants were placed using a mucosa supported guide and 100 implants were placed using a bone supported guide. Implant stability was measured by means of resonance frequency analysis (RFA) and damping capacity assessment (Periotest, PTV). Bone density (Hounsfield units) was measured at different regions of interest (ROI) and cortex thickness was measured around each implant.

Results

Implant stability correlated significantly with the different ROI. The best correlation for RFA was obtained for the spongious bone ROI (r = .64) and PTV best correlated with the coronal cortex density (r = ?.41). Shorter implants (9 mm) had a significantly lower primary stability than longer implants (11, 13, 15 mm). Primary stability was also significantly higher in 4 mm diameter implants than in 3.5 mm diameter implants. A formula for the prediction of primary stability based on the different variables investigated was developed.

Conclusions

Bone density and cortex thickness have a significant influence on implant primary stability. Longer and wider implants reached higher primary stability than shorter and narrower implants. These correlations lose their significance after osseointegration has taken place. Implant stability can be predicted based on an preoperative analysis of bone characteristics.     

A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: survival to 18 months

PROBLEM: A roughened, commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) implant design has been developed that features a different length and pitch for each screw thread to direct functional stresses away from cortical bone and to the more resilient trabecular bone. Abutment-implant connection is made using a conical taper to provide a seal against invasion by microorganisms. PURPOSE: To assess short-term (18 months) clinical performance of this innovative implant design. METHODS: A total of 1,419 implants were placed in 313 patients to support 419 prostheses in a multidisciplinary, multicentered, prospective clinical study conducted by the Ankylos Implant Clinical Research Group (AICRG). More than 100 dentists at 32 centers in the United States, 1 in Korea, and 1 in Taiwan are involved in the study. Failure was defined as implant removal for any reason. The influence of mobility at placement, implant length and diameter, incision type, augmentation, crestal bone reduction, bone density, and the use of the operating room or dental clinic on survival were evaluated over 18 months. Crestal bone loss between placement and uncovering was also determined. RESULTS: Crestal bone loss ranged from 0.2 to 0.5 mm. The overall success rate from placement to 18 months was 96.6%. Implants mobile at placement failed more frequently (16.9%) compared with stable implants (3.1%). Wide-diameter implants and longer implants exhibited higher survival rates. Incision design and surgery location did not influence survival. Bone density was important to clinical survival.     

Experience with the Astra dental implant system.

The Astra Dental Implant System appears to be a relatively successful and economical method of osseointegration. This article lists its clinical components, explains how the system is fitted and discusses the preliminary results.     

Advances in surfaces and osseointegration in implantology. Biomimetic surfaces

The present work is a revision of the processes occurring in osseointegration of titanium dental implants according to different types of surfaces -namely, polished surfaces, rough surfaces obtained from subtraction methods, as well as the new hydroxyapatite biomimetic surfaces obtained from thermochemical processes. Hydroxyapatite’s high plasma-projection temperatures have proven to prevent the formation of crystalline apatite on the titanium dental implant, but lead to the formation of amorphous calcium phosphate (i.e., with no crystal structure) instead. This layer produce some osseointegration yet the calcium phosphate layer will eventually dissolve and leave a gap between the bone and the dental implant, thus leading to osseointegration failure due to bacterial colonization. A new surface -recently obtained by thermochemical processes- produces, by crystallization, a layer of apatite with the same mineral content as human bone that is chemically bonded to the titanium surface. Osseointegration speed was tested by means of minipigs, showing bone formation after 3 to 4 weeks, with the security that a dental implant can be loaded. This surface can be an excellent candidate for immediate or early loading procedures. Key words:Dental implants, implants surfaces, osseointegration, biomimetics surfaces.