Evaluation of Four Commercial Immunoglobulin G (IgG)- and IgM-Specific Enzyme Immunoassays for Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae Infections

The four following commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) were assessed and compared for their performance in detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG)- and IgM-specific antibodies Platelia EIA, ImmunoWELL M. pneumoniae ELISA IgG and IgM, ETI-MP-IgG and IgM EIAs and Biotest anti-M. pneumoniae IgG and IgM ELISA (referred to herein as EIA-Platelia, EIA-BMD, EIA-Sorin, and EIA-Biotest). Three groups of patients were investigated: 39 patients (27 children and 12 adults) with respiratory infections who tested positive by PCR for M. pneumoniae in respiratory specimens (group I; 52 serum samples), 61 healthy children and adults (group II; 61 serum samples), and 20 patients with rheumatoid factor or antinuclear antibodies, or who tested positive for antiviral IgM (group III; 20 serum samples). In group III, the IgM specificity for EIA-Platelia, EIA-BMD, EIA-Biotest, and EIA-Sorin was 100, 90, 65, and 25%, respectively. In the children from group I, the four EIAs had similar IgM sensitivities (89 to 92%); the sensitivity for IgG was greater with EIA-BMD and EIA-Biotest than with EIA-Platelia and EIA-Sorin (66 and 78% versus 55 and 52%, respectively). In adult patients from group I, 9 to 10 serum samples were positive for IgG with a concordant sensitivity of 75 to 83% between the four EIAs but a striking difference in IgM sensitivity: 16% by EIA-Platelia and EIA-BMD, 50% by EIA-Biotest, and 58% by EIA-Sorin. Discrepant and unexpected results were observed in IgM detection from control healthy patients using EIA-Sorin and EIA-Biotest, confirming the lack of specificity of these two EIAs and making them inaccurate for routine diagnosis. A good concordance of IgG seroprevalence in healthy adults was found between the four EIAs (66 to 70%), though this concordance was lower with EIA-Platelia (43%). In healthy children, EIA-BMD and EIA-Biotest gave a higher IgG seroprevalence than EIA-Sorin and EIA-Platelia (45% each for the former compared to 17 and 20%, respectively, for the latter). These results confirm that the IgM EIA serology test is a valuable tool for the early diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infections in children, as long as the EIA used is specific. In adults, the difficult interpretation of EIAs suggests that paired sera, combined with PCR detection on respiratory tract specimens collected on admission of patient, should be required for accurate diagnosis.     

Analysis of eight commercial enzyme immunoassay tests for detection of antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in human serum

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an important etiologic agent of primary atypical pneumonia in children and adults. The diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection is commonly confirmed through serologic testing. In this study, we used paired sera from 51 patients (all with confirmed M. pneumoniae infection and positive complement fixation [CF] titers) to compare the results of eight enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) available commercially in the United States. We compared two single-use EIAs and six plate-type EIAs. Results from acute-phase sera ranged from only 7 (14%) positive by ImmunoWELL (GenBio) immunoglobulin M (IgM) EIA to 23 (45%) positive by Zeus IgG EIA. When both the acute-phase and convalescent-phase serum samples were examined, positive results ranged from 20 (39%) by the ImmunoWELL (GenBio) IgM assay to 45 (88%) positive by the Remel IgG-IgM EIA. In this study, the single-use EIAs by Remel and Meridian were more reliable than were the plate-type EIAs. Among the plate-type EIAs, the Zeus and DiaSorin assays (which detect antibodies to protein antigens) were more sensitive than the ImmunoWELL assay (which detects antibodies to glycolipid antigens). In general, IgG EIAs on convalescent-phase sera were more concordant with one another than were IgM EIAs with one another. Scatter plot analysis of convalescent-phase sera showed that, as the CF titer dropped, the IgM assays identified fewer positive convalescent-phase sera. In contrast, the IgG assays provided fairly consistent positive results for convalescent-phase sera with CF titers of 64 and above. Results of individual tests and overall limitations of serodiagnostics for M. pneumoniae infections are discussed.     

Enzyme immunoassay for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae.

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae was developed. The EIA was evaluated on the basis of results in the M. pneumoniae complement fixation (MPCF) test and the cold agglutinin test. Serum samples from 430 patients with respiratory infections of known or unknown etiology, from 91 healthy children and adults and from 20 patients with rheumatoid factor, were investigated. By the criteria chosen for positive diagnostic EIA values, we found that the combined measurement of specific IgM and IgG gave a specificity of 99.7% and a sensitivity of 97.8%. If only IgM antibodies were measured, the specificity was 100% and the sensitivity was 88%. For IgG alone the specificity was 99.7%, but the sensitivity was only 46% because of the high EIA cutoff value chosen for IgG. We found no false positives among serum samples from patients with non-M. pneumoniae respiratory infection of known etiology, and there were no false IgM positives due to rheumatoid factor. In some cases the IgM EIA results became positive earlier in the course of illness than the MPCF titer. While children and teenagers responded predominantly with IgM antibodies, patients older than 40 years often had an IgG response only (56% of cases), probably because of reinfection. We conclude that this EIA is a good alternative to the combined MPCF and cold agglutinin tests in the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection.     

Importance of methodology in determination of Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositivity in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary atherosclerosis

Enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae antibodies were compared to the microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test, the reference method. Furthermore, we assessed the hypothesis that a possible relationship between Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies and coronary artery disease is dependent on the type of EIA. Sera from 112 healthy men (mean age, 50.1 years) were tested for antibodies against Chlamydia pneumoniae by five commercial test kits: Focus Chlamydia MIF IgG test, Labsystems Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG EIA (LS EIA), R-Biopharm Elegance Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG EIA (RB EIA), Medac Chlamydia pneumoniae IgG sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA (MCp sELISA) and Medac Chlamydia IgG recombinant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ELISA (MC rELISA). Sera from 106 consecutive male patients (mean age, 63.6 years) undergoing diagnostic coronary angiography were also examined using the Focus MIF, LS EIA, MCp sELISA, and MC rELISA techniques. The agreement between LS EIA (65 to 83% [controls-patients]) or MC rELISA (49 to 61%) and Focus MIF (78 to 83%) was average to fair (kappa = 0.597 and 0.234, respectively). MCp sELISA and RB EIA showed good agreement with MIF (kappa = 0.686 and 0.665, respectively), with 80 to 89 and 79% of individuals reacting positively. A significant difference in seroprevalence between patients and healthy subjects was observed with the LS EIA, while seropositivities in the two study groups appeared equal when the Focus MIF assay was applied. The MC rELISA and MCp sELISA gave statistically significant differences in antibody seroprevalence in patients with two-vessel disease or when the patient group combined individuals with a two- or a three-vessel disease, respectively. The concordance between MIF and other commonly used serological assays for C. pneumoniae IgG antibody detection is good to fair. The choice of serological assay has important implications for C. pneumoniae antibody seroprevalence, as well as for the relationship between C. pneumoniae seropositivity and coronary artery disease.     

Analysis of Eight Commercial Enzyme Immunoassay Tests for Detection of Antibodies to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Human Serum

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an important etiologic agent of primary atypical pneumonia in children and adults. The diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infection is commonly confirmed through serologic testing. In this study, we used paired sera from 51 patients (all with confirmed M. pneumoniae infection and positive complement fixation [CF] titers) to compare the results of eight enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) available commercially in the United States. We compared two single-use EIAs and six plate-type EIAs. Results from acute-phase sera ranged from only 7 (14%) positive by ImmunoWELL (GenBio) immunoglobulin M (IgM) EIA to 23 (45%) positive by Zeus IgG EIA. When both the acute-phase and convalescent-phase serum samples were examined, positive results ranged from 20 (39%) by the ImmunoWELL (GenBio) IgM assay to 45 (88%) positive by the Remel IgG-IgM EIA. In this study, the single-use EIAs by Remel and Meridian were more reliable than were the plate-type EIAs. Among the plate-type EIAs, the Zeus and DiaSorin assays (which detect antibodies to protein antigens) were more sensitive than the ImmunoWELL assay (which detects antibodies to glycolipid antigens). In general, IgG EIAs on convalescent-phase sera were more concordant with one another than were IgM EIAs with one another. Scatter plot analysis of convalescent-phase sera showed that, as the CF titer dropped, the IgM assays identified fewer positive convalescent-phase sera. In contrast, the IgG assays provided fairly consistent positive results for convalescent-phase sera with CF titers of 64 and above. Results of individual tests and overall limitations of serodiagnostics for M. pneumoniae infections are discussed.     

Evaluation of 12 commercial tests and the complement fixation test for Mycoplasma pneumoniae-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies, with PCR used as the "gold standard"

Serology and nucleic acid amplification are the main diagnostic tools for the diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. Since no reference standard is generally accepted, serologic assays for M. pneumoniae have not been evaluated on a broad scale. In this study, 12 commercially available serologic assays (for immunoglobulin G [IgG] and IgM) and the complement fixation test (CFT) were evaluated by using M. pneumoniae DNA detection by real-time PCR as the "gold standard." The assays tested were Platelia EIA (Bio-Rad), SeroMP EIA (Savyon), Serion classic EIA (Virion/Serion), Biotest EIA (Biotest), Ridascreen EIA (r-Biopharm), AniLabsystems EIA (Labsystems), Novum EIA (Novum Diagnostica), Diagnosys EIA (MP products), Genzyme/Virotech EIA, ImmunoWell EIA (Genbio), ImmunoCard EIA (Meridian), and SerodiaMycoII microparticle agglutination (Fujirebio). Serum samples (n = 46) from 27 PCR-positive patients with a known first day of disease and sera (n = 33) from PCR-negative controls were obtained from prospective studies of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Additionally, control sera (n = 63) from patients with acute viral or bacterial respiratory infections other than those caused by M. pneumoniae were tested. The results showed low specificities for both the Novum and the ImmunoCard IgM assays. The IgM assays with the best performances in terms of sensitivity and specificity were AniLabsystems (77% and 92%, respectively), SeroMP (71% and 88%, respectively), and CFT (65% and 97%, respectively). Good receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve were found for CFT (0.94), the Platelia assay (0.87), and the AniLabsystems assay (0.85). We conclude that there are few commercial serologic assays for the detection of M. pneumoniae infections with appropriate performances in terms of sensitivity and specificity and that PCR has become increasingly important for the diagnosis of M. pneumoniae infections in defined groups of patients.     

Comparison of three serological methods for diagnosing Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection.

AIMS--To compare the novel Serofast latex agglutination test (International Mycoplasma, Toulon-Cedex, France) with the complement fixation test and enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for diagnosing acute Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection. METHODS--Paired sera from 60 patients with respiratory infection who had tested positive for M pneumoniae by complement fixation test were analysed with Serofast and indirect EIA for specific IgG and IgM antibodies. RESULTS--Serofast was less sensitive than the two other tests. Only 30 (50%) out of 60 paired sera which showed a diagnostic seroconversion or had high positive, unchanged antibody titres by complement fixation test or EIA, or both, tested positive with Serofast. Positive test results with Serofast were associated with the presence of a complement fixation test titre of > or = 512 and high positive IgM antibody titres measurable by EIA; virtually all patients with a complement fixation test titre of < 256 or those responding primarily in the IgG class tested negative with Serofast. Based on analysis of sera taken at the acute phase of infection, 10 (17%) of the 60 patients tested positive by complement fixation test, 10 (17%) by EIA, and only four (7%) by Serofast. CONCLUSIONS--Serofast was less sensitive than complement fixation test and EIA and it cannot be recommended as a replacement for either test in routine diagnostic use. It might prove useful in laboratories where non-specific tests, such as the determination of cold agglutinins, are still used for the diagnosis of M pneumoniae infection. Testing paired sera is, however, a prerequisite for obtaining acceptable sensitivity by Serofast as well as other serological methods currently available.     

Prevalence of Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G and A antibodies in a healthy Finnish population as analyzed by quantitative enzyme immunoassays

Chlamydia pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgA antibody seroprevalence rates and antibody levels related to age and gender were studied. The samples (n = 742) were collected during a nonepidemic period and analyzed by quantitative enzyme immunoassays (EIAs). Seroprevalence to C. pneumoniae was found to increase sharply in young children, and in the 15- to 19-year-old group it reached levels as high as 70 and 60% for IgG and IgA, respectively. After adolescence, seroprevalence showed a transient decrease and then continued to increase, although less dramatically than in early childhood. In the elderly the seroprevalence of IgG antibodies reached 75 and 100% in women and men, respectively. The corresponding rates of IgA antibodies were 73 and 100%. When a randomly selected subgroup of samples (n = 66) was analyzed in parallel by a microimmunofluorescence test and an EIA for C. pneumoniae IgA antibodies, similar seroprevalence rates were obtained (36 versus 35%). Seroprevalence to M. pneumoniae was already found to increase very sharply in 2- to 4-year-old children, reaching 16% for IgG and 8% for IgA. Seroprevalence to M. pneumoniae also continued to increase in adolescence, but in contrast to that to C. pneumoniae, the increase leveled off at about 40 to 50% in adulthood. In subjects aged over 65 years, prevalence did not exceed 60% for IgG or 35% for IgA. The seroprevalence patterns as well as the medians and variations of levels of C. pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae IgG antibodies were similar to those of corresponding IgA antibodies. Compared to IgG antibodies, IgA antibodies do not seem to be of additional value in the diagnosis of infections caused by these pathogens when single serum specimens are studied.     

Comparative evaluation of commercial Premier EIA and microimmunodiffusion and complement fixation tests for Coccidioides immitis antibodies.

A total of 409 serum and cerebrospinal fluid specimens from human subjects with proven coccidioidomycosis, with other infections, or with no apparent illness were tested for antibodies to Coccidioides immitis by the Premier EIA (Meridian Diagnostics, Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio), which tests for immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM responses to coccidioidal antigens, and by the conventional complement fixation (CF) or immunodiffusion (ID) assays for antibodies corresponding to those detected by the tube precipitin (TP) or CF tests. Of the 409 specimens, 47 were from persons with confirmed coccidioidomycosis and all were positive for C. immitis antibodies in IDCF tests and enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for both IgG and IgM. The EIA for detecting both IgG and IgM antibodies proved to be sensitive for detecting coccidioidomycosis case sera positive by the IDCF, IDTP, and CF tests. Maximal sensitivity for diagnosing coccidioidomycosis is dependent upon detection of both IgG and IgM antibodies in the EIA. The EIA, however, was not absolutely specific, since some sera from patients with confirmed blastomycosis and some from patients with noncoccidioidal disease produced false-positive reactions.     

Evaluation of four commercial IgG- and IgM-specific enzyme immunoassays for detecting Mycoplasma pneumoniae antibody: comparison with particle agglutination assay

Diagnosis of Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection is important due to its variable clinical manifestations and absence of response to beta-lactams. Introduction of enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for serologic diagnosis of M. pneumoniae has made it possible to separate the analyses of specific IgG and IgM antibodies. We compared four different commercial EIAs, ImmunoWELL IgG, IgM (GenBio), Medac IgG, IgA, IgM (Medac), Platelia IgG, IgM (Sanofi Pasteur), and Ridascreen IgG, IgA, IgM (r-Biopharm) with indirect particle agglutination assay (PA), Serodia-MycoII (Fujirebio). We tested 91 specimens from 73 pediatric patients (2-17 yr) hospitalized at a tertiary-care hospital between December 2005 and January 2006. The measurements of IgM EIAs were correlated with PA titers (Spearman's correlation coefficient, from 0.89 to 0.92) with high concordance rates, ranging from 82.4% to 92.3%. However, some negative IgM-EIA results in PA-positive specimens indicated that serial samplings with convalescent sera would be necessary to confirm M. pneumoniae infection.     

Performance of three microimmunofluorescence assays for detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae immunoglobulin M,G, and A antibodies

The microimmunofluorescence (MIF) test is considered the "gold standard" for laboratory diagnosis of acute and chronic Chlamydia pneumoniae infection. The performance of a MIF test based on C. pneumoniae antigen from Washington Research Foundation (WRF) was compared with those of assays from Labsystems (LAB) and MRL Diagnostics (MRL) by investigation of sera from three groups of patients: group I, 83 sera from 28 patients with atypical pneumonia; group II, 37 sera from 16 patients with acute C. pneumoniae or Chlamydia psittaci respiratory tract infection confirmed by PCR or culture; group III, 100 sera from 100 persons enrolled in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. The accordance among the results of the WRF assay and the two commercial assays was excellent for the immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibody detection rate (98%). The accordance in detection rates for IgG and IgA antibodies in sera from patients with acute infections was acceptable (87 and 88%), and in sera from group III, it was excellent (95 and 97%). The determinations of endpoint titers were reproducible with <1 dilution step difference for all three methods, except that the mean IgM antibody titer found by the LAB assay was almost 2 dilution steps higher than that found by the other two methods. Although the three assays use different C. pneumoniae strains as antigens, the detection rates and IgG and IgA endpoint titers were similar. The difference in endpoint titers of IgM antibodies is of no major concern, as the diagnosis of acute C. pneumoniae infection rests on the presence of IgM antibodies, not on their level.     

Development of a highly specific and sensitive rubella immunoglobulin M antibody capture enzyme immunoassay that uses enzyme-labeled antigen.

An enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for serum immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies to rubella virus based on enzyme labeling of viral antigen was developed. The sensitivity of the EIA for the detection of recent rubella virus infection was evaluated by using 115 rubella-IgM-antibody-positive serum specimens, which were confirmed as positive by Rubazyme M (Abbott Diagnostics). In addition, 12 individuals, 2 of whom were exposed to rubella through vaccination and 10 of whom were exposed through natural infection, were studied, and the results were compared with those obtained by indirect EIA (Rubelisa M; Electro-Nucleonics, Inc.) and immunoblotting. The sensitivity of the newly developed EIA with sera from these individuals was 100%. Serum specimens from two patients indicated that the IgM antibodies were detected by the newly developed EIA at the same time as IgM antibodies were detected by immunoblotting and before positive reactions were detected by an indirect EIA. The reference population consisted of 564 healthy blood donors and hospitalized patients (150 serum specimens). In addition, 145 serum specimens commonly giving false-positive reactions in conventional rubella IgM EIAs were studied. With these specimens, no false-positive reactions were observed. Positive IgM responses, which could not be confirmed by immunoblotting, were observed in two samples from the reference population. However, these two samples were rubella IgG positive. The overall specificity of the EIA was 99.8%.     

Comparison of a baculovirus-based VP2 enzyme immunoassay (EIA) to an Escherichia coli-based VP1 EIA for detection of human parvovirus B19 immunoglobulin M and immunoglobulin G in sera of pregnant women

A split-sample study was conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of an enzyme immunoassay that detects the human parvovirus B19 virus (B19V) immunoglobulin M (IgM) or IgG in the sera of pregnant women. The initial study compared a baculovirus-expressed VP2 enzyme immunoassay (BVP2 EIA) (Biotrin International Inc., Dublin, Ireland) with the currently available and commonly used Escherichia coli-expressed VP1 enzyme immunoassay (EVP1 EIA) (MRL Diagnostics, Cypress, Calif.). There was a high degree of agreement between the two assays in the detection of IgM antibodies (283 of 307 [92.2%]) or IgG antibodies (279 of 311 [89. 7%]), with the majority of discrepancies (IgM, 17 of 24 [71%]; IgG, 16 of 31 [50%]) being due to equivocal data obtained with the EVP1 EIA. Specimens with discordant BVP2 EIA and EVP1 EIA results (23 of 24 IgM and 32 of 32 IgG results) were analyzed further by baculovirus-based VP1 immunofluorescence assays (BVP1 IFAs) (Biotrin International). The BVP2 EIA and BVP1 IFA results for 20 of 23 and 28 of 32 specimens for IgM and IgG, respectively, were concordant. In contrast, the EVP1 EIA and BVP1 IFA data for only 3 of 23 and 4 of 32 specimens for IgM and IgG, respectively, were in agreement, despite the fact that the same capsid antigen was used. Both the BVP2 EIAs and BVP1 IFAs utilize a conformational viral capsid antigen, while the EVP1 EIA uses a denatured viral capsid antigen. In conclusion, the BVP2 EIAs produced far fewer equivocal results for IgM and IgG, correlating more closely to the confirmatory BVP IFAs, than did the EVP1 EIAs and proved to be more accurate for detecting B19V antibodies in the sera of pregnant women.     

Human cytomegalovirus infection: diagnostic potential of recombinant antigens for cytomegalovirus antibody detection.

Recombinant antigen-based enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for the detection of human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) specific antibody are believed to yield a higher sensitivity and specificity than virus lysate EIAs. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the accuracy of newly established HCMV assays (Copalis CMV Multiplex, Sorin; Cobas Core CMV IgG and IgM EIAs, Roche Diagnostics; Anti-HCMV recombinant IgG, gB-IgG, IgM and IgA, Biotest; and ETI-CYTOK-G PLUS and M reverse PLUS, Sorin) based on recombinant antigens and/or virus lysate for laboratory diagnosis of HCMV infection. For the assessment of sensitivity, follow-up samples from patients suffering from active HCMV infection were tested. Testing a large number of potentially interfering samples challenged the specificity of the assays. There was no statistically significant difference in the performance of HCMV IgG assays. The results were more heterogeneous for the detection of serological markers of active infection (HCMV IgM, HCMV IgA and anti-CM2). The sensitivities of the different assays ranged between 40.5 and 71.4%. A variable number (17.8-1.7%) of false-positive results were obtained among potentially interfering serum samples. Two of the recombinant antigen based assays showed a high degree of interference with EBV VCA-IgM-positive sera. The best performance was achieved with ETI-CYTOK-M reverse PLUS since it combined the highest sensitivity with specificity. Commercially available assays based on recombinant antigens showed, overall, a poorer performance than the virus lysate EIA.     

Evaluation of nine serological tests for diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis

Two hundred serum specimens including 13 sera from patients with early Lyme borreliosis, 21 patients with late Lyme borreliosis, 15 rheumatoid factor positive sera, 31 sera from patients with syphilis and 84 sera from healthy controls were used to evaluate the following assays for the detection of antibodies toBorrelia burgdorferi: two in-house enzyme immunoassays (EIAs), two in-house immunofluorescent antibody assays (IFAs), a commercial haemagglutination assay (HA) (Diagast) and four commercial EIAs (Diagast, Dako, Diamedix, Whittaker Bioproducts). In early and late Lyme borreliosis sera sensitivity ranged from 8 % to 62 % and from 62 % to 86 % respectively. With the exception of the Dako EIA, which was significantly more sensitive in early Lyme borreliosis (62 %) than the Diagast HA (8 %) (p=0.05), differences in sensitivity were not significant. In healthy controls the specificity was 95 % for all tests. Taking into account sensitivity, specificity, intra-test and inter-test precision, ease of performance and cost, the Dako EIA and Diamedix EIA were shown to be good alternatives to the in-house EIA and in-house IFA. Because of its low sensitivity in diagnosis of both early and late Lyme borreliosis, use of the Diagast HA should be discouraged.     

Identification of Past and Recent Parvovirus B19 Infection in Immunocompetent Individuals by Quantitative PCR and Enzyme Immunoassays: a Dual-Laboratory Study

Parvovirus B19 (B19V) is a member of the family Parvoviridae, genus Erythrovirus. B19V-specific IgG and IgM react differently against conformational and linear epitopes of VP1 and VP2 antigens, leading to the development of IgG avidity and epitope type specificity (ETS) enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) for distinguishing past from recent infection. Additionally, B19V viral load determination (by quantitative PCR [qPCR]) is increasingly used in the staging of B19V infection. In this study, the utility of these methods is compared. A panel of 78 sera was jointly tested by the Virus Reference Department (VRD), London, United Kingdom, and the Haartman Institute (HI), Helsinki, Finland, using a number of EIAs, e.g., B19V-specific IgG and IgM, IgG avidity, and ETS EIAs. At VRD, the sera were also tested by a B19V viral load PCR (qPCR). By consensus analysis, 43 (55.1%) sera represented past infection, 28 (35.9%) sera represented recent infection, and 7 (9.0%) sera were indeterminate. Both VRD B19V qPCR and HI B19V VP2 IgM EIA gave the highest agreement with consensus interpretation for past or recent infection, with an overall agreement of 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92 to 100) and positive predictive value (PPV) of 100% (95% CI, 87 to 100). Nine sera designated as representing past infection by consensus analysis were B19V IgM positive by a commercial VRD B19V IgM EIA and B19V IgM negative by a new HI in-house B19V VP2 IgM EIA. A new VRD B19V IgG avidity EIA showed good (>95%) agreement (excluding equivocal results) with consensus interpretations for past or recent infection. Correct discrimination of past from recent B19V infection was achieved through application of qPCR or by appropriate selection of EIAs.     

Age-related interference with Chlamydia pneumoniae microimmunofluorescence serology due to circulating rheumatoid factor.

Microimmunofluorescence (MIF) serology is commonly used in the diagnosis of chlamydial infections. In the MIF assay, Chlamydia pneumoniae elementary bodies were used to detect C. pneumoniae immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies in paired serum samples from 286 patients with respiratory illnesses. In 69 patients, MIF serology was compared with C. pneumoniae cultures. All C. pneumoniae cultures remained negative. However, 205 (71%) of 286 patients were C. pneumoniae antibody positive and 64 (22%) had MIF test results indicating recent infection; 11 showed a fourfold increase in IgG titer, 18 had IgG titers of greater than or equal to 1:512, and 41 had IgM titers of greater than or equal to 1:16. In 35 (55%) of 64 patients, a recent-infection diagnosis was based on C. pneumoniae IgM antibodies only. However, 78% of C. pneumoniae IgM-positive patients had circulating rheumatoid factor (RF) by rheumatoid arthritis latex assay. RF positivity increased with age. After absorption with anti-human IgG, all C. pneumoniae IgM-positive sera became C. pneumoniae IgM negative in the MIF assay. Twenty-five patients with active rheumatoid arthritis but without respiratory illness were also tested; 14 were C. pneumoniae IgG positive and C. pneumoniae IgM positive as well. Absorption of IgG from these RF-containing sera invariably resulted in disappearance of reactivity in the MIF IgM assay. We conclude that with age the serologic diagnosis of recent C. pneumoniae infection becomes increasingly prone to false-positive results unless sera are routinely absorbed prior to MIF IgM testing.     

Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays Using Recombinant Envelope Protein Expressed in COS-1 and Drosophila S2 Cells for Detection of West Nile Virus Immunoglobulin M in Serum or Cerebrospinal Fluid

Humans infected with West Nile virus (WNV) develop immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies soon after infection. The microtiter-based assays for WNV IgM antibody detection used by most state public health and reference laboratories utilize WNV antigen isolated from infected Vero cells or recombinant envelope protein produced in COS-1 cells. Recombinant antigen produced in COS-1 cells was used to develop a WNV IgM capture enzyme immunoassay (EIA). A supplementary EIA using WNV envelope protein expressed in Drosophila melanogaster S2 cells was also developed. Both assays detected WNV IgM in the sera of experimentally infected rhesus monkeys within approximately 10 days postinfection. Human sera previously tested for WNV IgM at a state public health laboratory (SPHL) were evaluated using both EIAs. Among the sera from 20 individuals with laboratory-confirmed WNV infection (i.e., IgM-positive cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) that were categorized as equivocal for WNV IgM at the SPHL, 19 were IgM positive and one was negative by the new EIAs. Of the 19 IgM-positive patients, 15 were diagnosed with meningitis or encephalitis; the IgM-negative patient was not diagnosed with neurological disease. There was 100% agreement between the EIAs for the detection of WNV IgM. CSF samples from 21 individuals tested equivocal for WNV IgM at the SPHL; all 21 were positive in both bead assays, and 16 of these patients were diagnosed with neurological disease. These findings demonstrate that the new EIAs accurately identify WNV infection in individuals with confirmed WNV encephalitis and that they exhibit enhanced sensitivity over that of the microtiter assay format.     

Evaluation of Fifteen Commercially Available Serological Tests for Diagnosis of Lyme Borreliosis

 The performance of 11 commercially available enzyme immunoassays (EIA) and four Western blot (WB) tests for the detection of IgM and IgG antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi were compared. A total of 229 serum specimens were used: 26 from patients with early Lyme borreliosis, 13 from patients with late Lyme borreliosis, 62 from healthy controls and 128 from patients with disorders clinically mimicking Lyme borreliosis and/or known to cause cross-reactivity in Lyme borreliosis serological tests (patient control group). In specimens from patients with early Lyme borreliosis, the sensitivity of the individual tests ranged from 35 to 81% for detection of IgM. In late Lyme borreliosis, sensitivity of the tests ranged from 46 to 92%. In healthy controls the specificity of the tests ranged from 89 to 100% and from 82 to 97% for IgM and IgG tests, respectively. In the patient control group, specificity of the tests ranged from 75 to 90% for IgM and from 84 to 100% for IgG tests. The Behring (Germany) and Genzyme Virotech (Germany) IgM EIA tests showed the best performance in detecting early Lyme borreliosis. For the detection of late Lyme borreliosis, the Dako (Denmark) IgG test was the best despite its low sensitivity. The maximum sensitivity of Western blotting for detecting IgM in patients with early Lyme borreliosis and IgG in patients with late Lyme borreliosis was 50 and 46%, respectively. The use of an EIA-WB two-test protocol improved the specificity and positive predictive values of the EIA results but caused a significant loss in sensitivity. Patients with Epstein-Barr virus or cytomegalovirus infection who had a positive reaction in the IgM EIA could not be discriminated from patients with early Lyme borreliosis with the help of Western blotting. Hence, positive and negative predictive values in combination with sensitivity and specificity values indicated that the exclusion of these infections was more relevant than the confirmation of a positive IgM EIA with Western blot.