抗癫痫药体外诱导鼠星形胶质细胞多药耐受基因P-糖蛋白的表达

目的：了解常用抗癫痫药（AED）对大鼠大脑上 星形胶质细胞多药耐受基因（MDR1）的诱导作用,探讨难治性癫痫的耐药机制。方法：给予不同浓度的苯巴比妥钠（PB）、苯妥英钠（PHT）、卡马西平（CBZ）和丙戊酸钠（VPA）持续作用于培养的新生鼠大脑皮质星形胶质细胞,分别在给药后10、20和30d,用免疫细胞化学法检测MDR1的标志物P－糖蛋白（Pgp)的表达率。结果,无药物作用的正常星形胶质细胞Pgp的表达率在各时点均小于5％,低浓度组各药在各时点Pgp的表达率与对照组比较差异无显著意义,有效血药浓度组仅PB20mg/L,PB40mg/L和PHT20mg/L在30d时Pgp表达增强;给药后10d,高浓度组各药Pgp表达率无明显增高;20d时PB、PHT和VPA组Pgp表达增强;30d时4种AED均有Pgp表达增强。结论AED可以诱导MDR1表达增强,且与剂量和时间相关。AED诱导的MDR1表达增强可能参与了难治性癫痫的形成。     

Comparison of antiepileptic drug levels in sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy with deaths from other causes

PURPOSE: (a) To compare postmortem antiepileptic drug (AED) levels in patients with sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) with those in a control group of subjects with epilepsy. If SUDEP patients more frequently had undetectable or subtherapeutic AED levels, this would suggest that compliance with AED treatment is poorer in this group and that poor compliance is a risk factor for SUDEP. (b) To determine whether a particular AED was detected more commonly in the SUDEP group, suggesting that this AED is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP. METHODS: A retrospective study of coronial cases was performed. Postmortem AED levels in 44 SUDEP cases and 44 control cases were compared. The control group consisted of epileptics who died of causes other than epilepsy, including natural disease (e.g., ischemic heart disease, accidents, and suicide). The AEDs measured included carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, (PHT), valproate (VPA), phenobarbitone (PB), lamotrigine (LTG), clonazepam (CZP), and clobazam (CLB). The number of SUDEP and control cases in which CBZ only was detected were compared, as were the number in which PHT only was detected. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, the SUDEP group showed no difference in the number with no detectable AEDs (13 vs. 11), the number with subtherapeutic AEDs (10 vs. 13), and the number with therapeutic levels (21 in both groups). CBZ only was detected in 11 SUDEPs and 11 controls, and PHT only in five SUDEPs and 10 controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the SUDEP group were no less compliant with AED treatment than the control group. This study does not support the hypothesis that poor compliance with AED treatment is a risk factor for SUDEP. There was no evidence that PHT or CBZ is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP.     

Clinical Side Effects of Phenobarbital, Primidone, Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate During Monotherapy in Children

The rate of onset of side effects was examined in 392 pediatric outpatients who received long-term monotherapy with phenobarbital (PB), primidone (PRM), phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), or valproate (VPA) for epilepsy or febrile convulsions. The severity of side effects (based on need to alter treatment), the nature of each drug's most common side effects, and the doses and plasma levels of occurrence were recorded. Our results show that usually accepted therapeutic ranges are well tolerated. Indeed, although some form of side effect occurred in 50% of patients, treatment had to be changed in only 18% and the drug had to be stopped in only 7%. In decreasing order, the rates for side effects were PHT (71%) greater than PB (64%) greater than CBZ (43%) greater than VPA (43%) greater than PRM (29%). Serious side effects requiring withdrawal of treatment occurred at the following rates: PHT (10%) greater than VPA (8%) greater than PRM (8%) greater than PB (4%) greater than CBZ (3%). Among our patients, the best tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) was CBZ, and the least tolerated was PHT. Behavioral disorders were most common with PB, neurologic disorders with PHT, digestive tract disorders with VPA, and gingival hyperplasia and hirsutism with PHT. Behavioral disorders involving excitement seen with PB and PRM occurred most commonly at low plasma levels. Behavioral disorders involving depression seen with PB and VPA, those involving excitement seen with PHT and VPA, and digestive disorders seen with VPA occurred particularly when plasma levels were high.     

Protein binding of four antiepileptic drugs in maternal and umbilical cord serum.

The total and protein free levels of 4 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in serum from 35 maternity patients who had been treated with AED monotherapy throughout pregnancy were studied. Results were compared with those in the umbilical cord serum at the time of delivery, and the placental transfer of AEDs was evaluated from the viewpoint of the protein binding capacity of the drug. The materials consisted of 35 samples of maternal and umbilical cord serum in total and included 13 patients on phenobarbital (PB), 7 on phenytoin (PHT), 7 on carbamazepine (CBZ) and 8 on valproic acid (VPA). The mean fetal/maternal total concentration ratios were 0.86, 0.91, 0.73 and 1.59 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being above 1. On the other hand, the mean fetal/maternal free fraction ratios were 1.13, 1.10, 1.42 and 0.50 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being less than 1. Correlation of the 2 ratios showed a reciprocal proportion with a correlation coefficient of -0.90 (P < 0.005). It was considered that the fetal/maternal total concentration ratio of 4 AEDs was regulated by the fetal/maternal free fraction ratio of the corresponding AEDs and that the difference in fetal/maternal free fraction ratio depended on the type of drug being administered.     

A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The Italian TDM Study Group in Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical impact of monitoring serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: One-hundred eighty patients with partial or idiopathic generalized nonabsence epilepsy, aged 6 to 65 years, requiring initiation of treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), or primidone (PRM) were randomly allocated to two groups according to an open, prospective parallel-group design. In one group, dosage was adjusted to achieve serum AED concentration within a target range (10-20 microg/ml for PHT, 15-40 microg/ml for PB, 4-11 microg/ml for CBZ, and 40-100 microg/ml for VPA), whereas in the other group, dosage was adjusted on clinical grounds. Patients were followed up for 24 months or until a change in therapeutic strategy was clinically indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients with partial epilepsy were treated with CBZ, whereas generalized epilepsies were most commonly managed with PB or VPA. PHT was used only in a small minority of patients. A total of 116 patients completed 2-year follow-up, and there were no differences in exit rate from any cause between the monitored group and the control group. The proportion of assessable patients with mean serum drug levels outside the target range (mostly below range) during the first 6 months of the study was 8% in the monitored group compared with 25% in the control group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the monitored group and the control group with respect to patients achieving 12-month remission (60% vs. 61%), patients remaining seizure free since initiation of treatment (38% vs. 41%), and time to first seizure or 12-month remission. Frequency of adverse effects was almost identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of patients were treated with PHT, the drug for which serum concentration measurements are most likely to be useful. With the AEDs most commonly used in this study, early implementation of serum AED level monitoring did not improve overall therapeutic outcome. and the majority of patients could be satisfactorily treated by adjusting dose on clinical grounds. Monitoring the serum levels of these drugs in selected patients and in special situations is likely to be more rewarding than routine measurements in a large clinic population.     

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on delivery and early childhood--comparison among mono-therapies of valproic acid, phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital

The effects of antiepileptic drugs (AED) on infants during pregnancy and delivery were studied in a total of 82 epileptic mothers on various monotherapies; 29 cases receiving valproic acid (VPA), 20 receiving phenytoin (PHT), 18 on carbamazepine (CBZ) and 15 on phenobarbital (PB). While AED serum concentrations were low in most cases of VPA, PHT and PB except for one case of VPA which exceeded therapeutic limits, concentrations were within therapeutic levels in many cases of CBZ. Conclusion: When compared with normal controls, abnormal deliveries such as caesarian section were seen more frequently in epileptic mothers under AED treatment. In addition, infants in PB cases were shown to have significantly lower mean birth length, weight and head circumference, suggesting that PB may retard fetal growth. The incidence of malformation in cases of VPA, PHT, CBZ and PB, was 10.3%, 5.0%, 0% and 6.7%, respectively. There were five types of malformation: in VPA cases, spina bifida, Siamese twins and ventricular septal defect tended to be severe, while in PHT and PB cases, cor biloculare and hypospadias respectively were observed. In cases of VPA, serum levels in the umbilical cord were found to be 150% higher than those in the mother.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Pharmacokinetic behaviour of carbamazepine and its main metabolite-10, 11 epoxide of carbamazepine in monotherapy or in combination with other anti-epileptic drugs

A combination of anti-epileptic drugs is used for the necessary control of seizures. This results in a modulation of the metabolism in the epileptic patient and a concentration of the drugs and their metabolites in serum and in the brain, the target organ. Carbamazepine-10,11 epoxide (CBZE) is the main active metabolite of carbamazepine (CBZ). We have studied their interrelationship in concentrations in the plasma of 68 patients receiving CBZ, either as monotherapy or in combination with phenytoin (PHT) and phenobarbital (PB). The rate of CBZ metabolism was modulated in drug co-administration, which, depending on the grade of the induction of cytochrome p-450, decreases or increases the concentration of CBZE. A graph plotting the relationship between CBZ and CBZE concentrations in patients stabilized on a regime of CBZ alone is linear. The ratio of concentrations of CBZE/CBZ in serum is 0.12 when CBZ is administered as monotherapy, rising to 0.14 (CBZ + PB), 0.18 (CBZ + PHT) and 0.25 (CBZ + PHT + PB) when administered with the other drugs mentioned. From this it can be hypothesized that the additive of induction activities of PHT and PB operates on the mixed function oxidase system.     

Carbamazepine and phenytoin induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome is associated with HLA-B*1502 allele in Thai population

Purpose: Previous studies found a strong association between HLA‐B*1502 and carbamazepine (CBZ)‐induced Stevens‐Johnson syndrome (SJS) in Han Chinese, but not in Caucasian populations. Even in Han Chinese, the HLA‐B*1502 was not associated with CBZ‐induced maculopapular eruptions (MPE). This study seeks to identify whether HLA‐B*1502 is associated with CBZ‐ or phenytoin (PHT)‐induced SJS or MPE in a Thai population. Methods: Eighty‐one Thai epileptic patients between 1994 and 2007 from the Chulalongkorn Comprehensive Epilepsy Program were recruited. Thirty‐one subjects had antiepileptic drug (AED)‐induced SJS or MPE (6 CBZ‐SJS, 4 PHT‐SJS, 9 CBZ‐MPE, 12 PHT‐MPE), and 50 were AED‐tolerant controls. Results: For the first time, a strong association between HLA‐B*1502 and PHT‐induced SJS was found (p = 0.005). A strong association was also found between the HLA‐B*1502 and CBZ‐induced SJS (p = 0.0005), making Thai the first non‐Chinese population demonstrating such an association. Some patients, who were HLA‐B*1502 and suffered from CBZ‐induced SJS, could be tolerant to PHT and vice versa. This suggests that HLA‐B*1502 may be a common attribute required for a Thai patient to develop SJS from these two AEDs; other different elements, however, are also needed for each AED. In addition, no association between HLA‐B alleles and CBZ‐ or PHT‐induced MPE was found. Conclusions: CBZ‐ and PHT‐induced SJS, but not MPE, is associated with HLA‐B*1502 allele in Thai population.     

Effects of Discontinuation of Phenytoin, Carbamazepine, and Valproate on Concomitant Antiepileptic Medication

We report a prospective, controlled study of the effects of the reduction and discontinuation of phenytoin (PHT) (22 patients), carbamazepine (CBZ) (23 patients), and valproate (VPA) (25 patients) with concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The principal changes in the serum concentrations of concomitant AEDs were (a) phenobarbital (PB) concentrations decreased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT; (b) total CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 48% and free CBZ concentrations increased by a mean of 30% on discontinuation of PHT, with no change in CBZ-10, 11-epoxide (CBZ-E) concentrations; (c) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 19% on discontinuation of PHT; (d) VPA concentrations increased by a mean of 42% on discontinuation of CBZ; (e) ethosuximide (ESM) concentrations increased by a mean of 48% on discontinuation of CBZ; (f) PHT concentrations decreased by a mean of 26% on discontinuation of CBZ; (g) PHT free fraction decreased from a mean of 0.11 to 0.07 on discontinuation of VPA; and (h) the mean concentrations of total and free CBZ increased by a mean of 10 and 16%, respectively, on VPA discontinuation, with a concomitant mean 24% decrease in total CBZ-E and a 22% decrease in free CBZ-E. Apart from the decrease in PB concentrations on PHT discontinuation, all significant changes had occurred by 1 week after the end of AED discontinuation. The implication for clinical practice is that a serum AED concentration at this time reflects the new steady state. Free concentrations did not add any clinically useful information to that gained from analysis of total serum concentrations.     

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including antiepileptic drug (AED) teratogenicity and adverse perinatal outcomes. It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly compared to phenytoin (PHT) or lamotrigine (LTG). It is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. AED polytherapy probably contributes to the development of MCMs and reduced cognitive outcomes compared to monotherapy. Intrauterine exposure to VPA monotherapy probably reduces cognitive outcomes and monotherapy exposure to PHT or phenobarbital (PB) possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of MCMs. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered and avoidance of PHT and PB throughout pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes.     

Comparison of a Noninstrumented Immunoassay for Carbamazepine to High Performance Liquid Chromatography and Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay

The accuracy, precision, and potential clinical utility of a new whole blood, noninstrumented immunochromatographic assay (AccuLevel) for carbamazepine (CBZ) was evaluated in a multicenter trial including 100 pediatric and 205 adult patients. The AccuLevel assay, a fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA), and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) were used to determine CBZ concentration in samples from 111 female and 194 male patients aged 2-72 years (median 25 years). Mean +/- SD plasma CBZ concentrations in all patients were 7.4 +/- 3.0 micrograms/ml with the AccuLevel assay and 7.5 +/- 2.9 micrograms/ml with FPIA. In 204 patients, the mean concentration determined by the HPLC assay was 7.7 +/- 3.0 micrograms/ml, whereas concentrations determined by the AccuLevel and FPIA assays were 8.0 +/- 3.1 and 8.1 +/- 3.1 micrograms/ml, respectively. Concentrations determined by the AccuLevel and FPIA assays were significantly higher than those quantified by HPLC (p less than 0.05), but not different from each other. In addition, the AccuLevel assay was highly correlated with FPIA (r = 0.97) and HPLC (r = 0.98). Coefficients of variation for the AccuLevel assay at 8 micrograms/ml ranged from 6.8 to 7.5% for the three institutions. We conclude that the AccuLevel assay is a simple, reliable method for determining CBZ concentration in a small volume of whole blood and is an acceptable alternative for assessment of CBZ therapy and individualization of CBZ dosage in the physician's office or emergency room.     

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.     

Reduction in Internal Carotid Arterial Blood Flow Velocity in Children During Antiepileptic Drug Therapy with Clinical Dosages

Summary: We studied the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on internal carotid artery (ICA) blood flow velocity, as an index of total cerebral blood flow (CBF). The subjects were 45 newly diagnosed children with febrile convulsion or epilepsy who were seizure-free for a period long enough not to affect the results. They had no neurologic deficit, received fixed monotherapy, and were examined by a noninvasive Doppler ultrasound method, in comparisonwith 13 age-matched normal volunteers with no AED. In 30 patients, the measurements were performed before and after AED administration [10 with phenobarbital (PB), 10 with carbamazepine (CBZ), and 10 with valproate (VPA)], and performed before and after AED discontinuation in the remaining 15 patients (all with PB). Normal volunteers underwent the two consecutive examinations with a mean interval equal to that of the entire patient group, and there was no difference in velocity values between the measurements. In patients receiving CBZ or VPA, a significant reduction was noted in blood flow velocity after drug administration. Although velocity values in the patients receiving PB did not change after drug administration, they were significantly increased after complete discontinuation. In the present study, a slight but significant reduction in CBF caused by AED administration at therapeutic doses in children was suggested.     

Interactions of Phenobarbital and Phenytoin with Carbamazepine and Its Metabolites' Concentrations, Concentration Ratios, and Level/Dose Ratios in Epileptic Children

Summary: The effects of phenytoin (PHT) or phenobarbital (PB) comedication on the concentrations, concentration ratios, and level/dose ratios of carbamazepine (CBZ) and its metabolites were investigated. The hetero-induction effects of CBZ metabolism by PHT or PB were clearly demonstrated. Serum CBZ level/dose ratios in patients with CBZ polytherapy were decreased while CBZ- l0,11-epoxide (CBZ-E) and trans -l0,11-dihydroxy-10, 1-dihydro-CBZ (CBZ-H) concentrations were increased as compared with those of patients receiving CBZ alone. The concentration ratios of CBZ-H/CBZ and CBZ-E/ CBZ were also greater in patients receiving CBZ +PHT or CBZ+PB than in patients receiving CBZ alone. In addition, positive correlations between serum PHT concentration and CBZ-H/CBZ or CBZ-E/CBZ concentration ratios were observed. There were no significant differences in CBZ-H/CBZ-E concentration ratios, the free fractions of CBZ and its metabolites, and CBZ-E or CBZ-H 1eveYdose ratios among the three groups of patients. Because this approach investigates the in vivo relation between the substrates and products of the enzymes involved in CBZ biotransformation, more detailed information about the drug interactions was obtained. The results suggest that the PHT has a potent induction effect on CBZ epoxidase, whereas PB is a moderate inducer.     

Therapeutic antiepileptic drug monitoring: thirteen years of experience in the Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology in the Chair and Department of Developmental neurology

Determining antiepileptic drug (AED) concentration in biological fluids and calculating its dosage on this basis is a long-term method in the treatment of epilepsy. This facilitates the treatment and increases the safety of patients in the aspect of suitable seizure control and reduced risk of side effects. This report presented the range and the number of antiepileptic drug concentration determined during thirteen years activity of Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology in the Department of Developmental Neurology. There was also a number of drug concentrations particularly often determined presented, compared and discussed. Moreover, there were also analyses of subtherapeutic, therapeutic and potentially toxic concentration decomposition presented for subsequent AEDs. The frequency of conventional drug and of slow released forms for VPA and CBZ was compared. VPA appeared to be the most frequently monitored drug and CBZ occurred to be the next one. The concentrations of PHT, PB, PRM and ETH were more rarely determined. In the observed period of time the number of LPP concentration determined in the therapeutic range amounted to 69%, the least frequently the potentially toxic levels were determined--11%. Normal concentrations i.e. therapeutic ones were most often determined for CBZ (77%) and subtherapeutic levels were determined mostly for PHT.     

Antiepileptic Drug Monitoring at the Epilepsy Clinic: A Prospective Evaluation

To assess the value of on site therapeutic drug monitoring at the epilepsy clinic, management decisions were recorded before and immediately after antiepileptic drug (AED) concentrations became available. In the first year of this prospective study, 632 [277 carbamazepine (CBZ), 170 phenytoin (PHT), 113 valproate (VPA), and 72 phenobarbital (PB)] assays were performed during 488 clinic attendances in 182 actively managed epileptic patients. The results of drug analysis led to alterations in management at 114 patients visits, i.e., 23% of those monitored. Dosage was increased in response to the circulating AED concentration in 12% of consultations and decreased in another 7.5%. Unsuspected poor compliance was uncovered in eight patients, and in three others an AED was added or discontinued on the basis of the assay result. The time of the next appointment was rearranged in 58 attendances. Only 50% of results were in the "therapeutic" ranges for the four major AEDs. Dosage was adjusted (50 up, 16 down) after 54% of low results. "Therapeutic" levels were followed by a change in AED dose (52 up, 31 down) in 26%. Only 29% of concentrations above the "therapeutic" range persuaded the doctor to alter the dosage regimen, and in 20% of these an increase in dose was recommended. On-site AED monitoring had an immediate impact on clinical decision-making in greater than 23% of consultations but in a form more subtle than the simple quest for a therapeutic result.     

Rapid Switchover to Carbamazepine Using Pharmacokinetic Parameters

Summary: Purpose: The standard practice of switching patients to carbamazepine (CBZ) involves initiating a low dose and raising it by small increments until the desired dose is reached, to avoid intolerable adverse effects (AE). In a pilot study, a protocol using single-dose kinetic studies was developed to switch patients to CBZ through rapid-dose increments and to manage concurrent rapid taper of the previous antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) without causing AE. The purpose of this prospective study was (a) to reassess whether a rapid switchover to CBZ could be done with minimal or no AE and without causing an increase in seizures; (b) to determine whether the maintenance dose of CBZ predicted at the time of the singledose kinetic study can yield the desired concentration at steady state (C_ss); and (c) to determine the degree to which the calculated maintenance dose of CBZ will need to be adjusted after the previous AED has been discontinued for a four-week period. Methods: Twenty-five patients taking phenytoin (PHT) and/ or phenobarbital (PB) andor primidone (PRM) underwent a rapid switchover to CBZ following a 10 mg/kg single-dose kinetic study (day 1) which allowed calculation of a maintenance dose necessary to yield a mean C_ss of 10.2 (±2.2) mgA. On day 2, patients received a CBZ dose equivalent to 10 mgkg + 200 mg; thereafter, they underwent daily dose increments of 200 mg until the calculated maintenance dose was reached. Dose increments were modified in the case of AE. Concurrent tapering of the previous AED was started as of day 1: PHT by 100 mg/day, while PB and PRM were stopped on day 1: PB was restarted before patients were to be discharged from the hospital if a PB serum concentration above 10 mgA was identified at that time. Pharmacokinetic data and occurrence of AE were compared between the two groups at the time of the single-dose kinetic study, at the completion of the switchover to CBZ, and 4 weeks after discontinuation of the previous AED. Results: All patients completed the switchover to CBZ within a mean time period of 6 days (±2), reaching a mean maintenance dose of 1, 639 mg/day (±370) which yielded a mean C_SS of 11.3 (±3.2) mg/l. The maintenance dose had to be lowered by 20.4% (±8.3) in 59% of patients within the four-week period following discontinuation of at least one of the previous AEDs. None of the patients experienced an increase in seizure frequency relative to baseline. Fifteen (60%) patients had no AE; five (20%) experienced AE of mild severity. AE rated as moderately severe (n = 4) or severe (n = 1) occurred in patients with a static encephalopathy (p = 0.02, Fisher's exact test) and among patients 2–55 years (p = 0.017, Fisher's exact test). Conclusions: A rapid switch-over to CBZ from PHT, PB, or PRM can be carried out safely with no, or minimal, AE in young adults, unless they suffer from static encephalopathy.