Carotid endarterectomy in the octogenarian

During a 10-year period from January 1983 to December 1992, 79 carotid endarterectomies were performed in patients aged 80 years or older. This represented 7.4% of the total patient population undergoing carotid endarterectomy at Emory University Hospital. The indications for surgery in this elderly population were transient ischemic attacks in 24 (30.3%), cerebrovascular accident in 12 (15.2%), amaurosis fugax in seven (8.9%), vascular tinnitus in one (1.3%), and asymptomatic stenosis in 35 (44.3%). The average degree of ipsilateral stenosis was 76.8%. Concomitant risk factors included coronary artery disease in 43%, systemic arterial hypertension in 51.9%, diabetes mellitus in 10.1%, and significant smoking history in 53.2%. Seventy-six percent of the procedures were performed under local anesthesia, and in all but two intraluminal shunts were used. Combined 30-day mortality and postoperative stroke morbidity in this population was 1.3% (one patient). Long-term follow-up ranging from 1 to 10 years (average 35 months) revealed no ipsilateral strokes. This experience suggests that carotid endarterectomy can be performed in an elderly population with morbidity and mortality rates similar to those in a younger cohort.Presented at the Fourth Annual Winter Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgical Society, Breckenridge, Colo., January 21– 24, 1994.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the octogenarian: is it appropriate?

To evaluate the role of carotid endarterectomy (CE) in patients 80 years and older an 8-year study of 172 nonrandomized cases of octogenarians with cerebrovascular disease was done. Ninety octogenarians underwent CE whereas 82 octogenarians, with arteriographically established carotid artery disease, were not operated on and served as a control series. The stroke rate after CE was 6%. In follow-up extending to 8 years the late stroke rate was only 2%, whereas the cumulative long-term stroke rate in the nonoperated group was 16%. These late strokes were appropriate to the side of the arteriographically demonstrated disease. In 1008 nonoctogenarians who underwent CE during this same time interval, the stroke rate after CE was 2% and the mortality rate was 0.6%. In the octogenarian population, however, the mortality rate after stroke was an alarming 40% in the operated group and 62% in the nonoperated control group. Arteriographic flow-limiting (greater than 75% stenosis) intracranial occlusive disease was identified in 53% of the octogenarians undergoing operation and in all patients who suffered a postoperative neurologic deficit. This incidence of severe intracranial disease was nearly five times that of the nonoctogenarian patients undergoing CE. Although the stroke rate after CE in the octogenarian patient was 6%, the late stroke rate was only 2% compared with the cumulative stroke rate of 16% in the nonoperated octogenarian patients. Severe intracranial occlusive disease and, therefore, flow deprivation may play a more significant role as a cause of postoperative deficits than in younger patients, but CE is appropriate for selected octogenarians on the basis of physiologic rather than chronologic age.     

Carotid surgery in the octogenarian

The records of 52 patients aged 80 years or older who underwent 56 carotid artery reconstructions were analyzed retrospectively. Four patients had amaurosis fugax, 27 patients had experienced one or more transient ischemic attacks, eight had a completely or partially reversible stroke, and 10 had vertebrobasilar insufficiency. Three patients were asymptomatic. Arteriograms documented stenosis >80% on the operated side in 48 cases, whereas the contralateral carotid artery was occluded or had >80% stenosis in 10 cases each. Two or more cerebral arteries were involved in 37 patients. CT scans were normal in only 21 (40%) patients. General anesthesia was used in 54 of 56 operations. Thirty-six endarterectomies, 18 bypasses, and two resection-anastomoses (for tortuosity) were performed. A shunt was employed in eight (14.3%) cases. One lethal stroke (1.9%) occurred during the first postoperative month. Three patients experienced nonfatal strokes, two of which gave rise to residual deficits. Two patients were lost to follow-up. For the remaining 49 patients the mean follow-up was 24 months. Two-year actuarial survival was 76.3% for the entire series and 67% for those surviving without neurologic events. This study shows that when properly selected the elderly population can safely undergo carotid surgery.Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Société de Chirurgie Vasculaire de Langue Française, Marseille, France, June 21–22, 1991.     

Carotid body tumor excisions: adverse outcomes of adding carotid endarterectomy

BACKGROUND: Carotid body tumors (CBT) are rare, infrequently malignant vascular neoplasms that are near the carotid bifurcation. Surgical excision is the treatment of choice, but individual surgeons or an institution cannot accumulate sufficient expertise to evaluate their outcomes with confidence. Our purpose was to report outcomes of surgical procedures for CBT from a nationwide dataset. STUDY DESIGN: Data were retrieved from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from nonfederal hospital discharge abstracts. Data were queried for ICD-9-CM code 39.8, operations on the carotid body and vascular bodies, and code 38.2, carotid endarterectomy. Outcomes analyzed were length of stay, charges, and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: An estmated 4,601 operations were identified, 3,746 for CBT surgical procedures only, and in 855 a carotid endarterectomy was also performed. Overall morbidity was 3.3%. Mortality with CBT alone was 2.0% but was 8.8% if carotid endarterectomy was also performed. CBT surgical procedures are most commonly performed in western states where higher elevations are found. Women constituted 59% of the population; mortality for women was higher than for men (12.4% versus 7.9%). Mortality in urban teaching hospitals was 2.1% and in nonteaching hospitals 4.9%. CONCLUSIONS: CBT surgical procedures are rare but are performed across a broad age spectrum. Mortality rate is low for patients having CBT alone but rises when CE is added. Women are more commonly affected and fare less well. Addition of CE to CBT surgical procedures and the resulting poor outcomes have not been previously described. Consideration should be given to referral of CBT patients to hospitals where mortality rates are low.     

Carotid endarterectomy and intracranial thrombolysis: simultaneous and staged procedures in ischemic stroke

PURPOSE: The feasibility and safety of combining carotid surgery and thrombolysis for occlusions of the internal carotid artery (ICA) and the middle cerebral artery (MCA), either as a simultaneous or as a staged procedure in acute ischemic strokes, was studied. METHODS: A nonrandomized clinical pilot study, which included patients who had severe hemispheric carotid-related ischemic strokes and acute occlusions of the MCA, was performed between January 1994 and January 1998. Exclusion criteria were cerebral coma and major infarction established by means of cerebral computed tomography scan. Clinical outcome was assessed with the modified Rankin scale. RESULTS: Carotid reconstruction and thrombolysis was performed in 14 of 845 patients (1.7%). The ICA was occluded in 11 patients; occlusions of the MCA (mainstem/major branches/distal branch) or the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) were found in 14 patients. In three of the 14 patients, thrombolysis was performed first, followed by carotid enarterectomy (CEA) after clinical improvement (6 to 21 days). In 11 of 14 patients, 0.15 to 1 mIU urokinase was administered intraoperatively, ie, emergency CEA for acute ischemic stroke (n = 5) or surgical reexploration after elective CEA complicated by perioperative intracerebral embolism (n = 6). Thirteen of 14 intracranial embolic occlusions and 10 of 11 ICA occlusions were recanalized successfully (confirmed with angiography or transcranial Doppler studies). Four patients recovered completely (Rankin 0), six patients sustained a minor stroke (Rankin 2/3), two patients had a major stroke (Rankin 4/5), and two patients died. In one patient, hemorrhagic transformation of an ischemic infarction was detectable postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Combining carotid surgery with thrombolysis (simultaneous or staged procedure) offers a new therapeutic approach in the emergency management of an acute carotid-related stroke. Its efficacy should be evaluated in interdisciplinary studies.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly

The records of 146 patients 80 years of age or older who underwent 183 carotid endarterectomy operations from 1964 through 1990 were reviewed to determine surgical risk. The indications for operation were asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis (n=36); ipsilateral transient ischemic attacks (n=46); ipsilateral stroke (n=28); ipsilateral retinal embolus (n=15); nonlateralizing symptoms (n=40); and asymptomatic side in patients with contralateral symptoms (n=18). Postoperatively, three patients (1.6% of operations) had a stroke with a residual deficit and three (1.6%) died. All deaths were from myocardial infarction. For comparison, during the same time period, the combined stroke with residual deficit and death rate for patients less than 80 operated upon for similar indications was 3.5%. Since 80-year-old patients have a life expectancy of at least five years, the authors conclude that elderly patients should be evaluated for carotid endarterectomy using criteria similar to that used for younger patients.Presented at the Tenth Annual Meeting of the Southern California Vascular Surgical Society, September 27–29, 1991, Marina Del Rey, California.     

Carotid endarterectomy outcomes research: reduced resource utilization using a clinical protocol

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the necessity of intensive care unit (ICU) utilization following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and to identify patients who can be managed postoperatively on a vascular unit using a clinical protocol. METHODS: Medical records of 50 patients admitted to the ICU following elective CEA were reviewed retrospectively for patient characteristics, morbidity, mortality, length of stay (LOS), and ICU intervention. Prospectively, the next 200 patients were routed to either a vascular unit or ICU, based on a clinical protocol. Endpoints were mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, total hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and ICU intervention. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in morbidity or mortality between patients admitted to the vascular unit and those admitted to the ICU. Of patients evaluated prospectively, 129 (63%) were admitted directly to the vascular unit. Of the 73 patients admitted to the ICU, 63% required direct intervention compared with only 54% of patients in the retrospective series (P=0.001). In addition, after institution of the protocol, ICU LOS decreased significantly from 1.4 to 0.6 days (P<0.001). The hospital cost savings using this protocol averaged $1043 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: A clinical protocol can select patients for admission to the ICU or the vascular unit following CEA without increase in morbidity or mortality. Selective use of the ICU conserved resources, decreased ICU LOS, and provided substantial cost savings.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly

The elderly population has the highest risk for developing stroke and the annual death rate is some 394/100,000 population. Moreover, the elderly are the fastest growing segment in our society. In carefully selected patients carotid endarterectomy may provide to prophylaxis against stroke. With a careful selection, acceptable low operative motality and morbidity rates may be achieved, comparable to the 4.3% and the 2.3% of the Veterans Affair and ACAS studies, in which the patients' mean ages were 64.1 and 67 years respectively.     

Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: comparison with patient characteristics and outcomes in younger patients

OBJECTIVES: Carotid endarterectomy has been shown to be of clear benefit to selected patients. However, recent trials of carotid endarterectomy versus best medical therapy have excluded octogenarians, and some authors have suggested that carotid endarterectomy would have an unfavorable cost-benefit relationship in octogenarians. We compared patients and results for carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians and younger patients. METHODS: We reviewed the results for 582 primary carotid endarterectomies (90 in octogenarians and 492 in younger patients) performed in 528 patients between February 1, 1985, and January 31, 1998 (all data were collected prospectively for the most recent 301 carotid endarterectomies). Conventional surgical technique was used with general anesthesia, selective shunting, and selective patching. Main outcome measures were perioperative and late ipsilateral stroke and death. RESULTS: The two groups were similar with respect to indications for carotid endarterectomy and patient characteristics, except that octogenarians were more likely to have histories of congestive heart failure or hypertension and less likely to have histories of smoking or chronic lung disease. Carotid endarterectomy was performed for asymptomatic disease in 27% of the octogenarians and 33% of the younger patients (P =.31). Stenosis was >/=80% in 90% of the octogenarians and 78% of the younger patients (P =.014). Perioperative strokes, all of which were ipsilateral, occurred in one octogenarian (1.1%) and eight younger patients (1.6%, P = 1.00). No octogenarians and two younger patients died within 30 days of surgery (P = 1.00). Length of stay and direct costs associated with carotid endarterectomy were similar for octogenarians and younger patients. Late strokes occurred in two octogenarians (one ipsilateral) and four younger patients (two ipsilateral). Life table estimates of freedom from ipsilateral stroke at 2 years were 98% and 97% for octogenarians and younger patients, respectively (log-rank P =.69), and life table estimates of patient survival at 4 years were 81% and 89% for octogenarians and younger patients, respectively (P =.11). Octogenarians represented an increasing fraction of the carotid endarterectomies performed during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians selected for carotid endarterectomy were similar to younger patients with respect to indications for carotid endarterectomy and comorbidities. Early mortality, early and late neurologic outcome, complications, and resource utilization were similar for the two groups, and more than 75% of octogenarians survived 4 years after undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Cost-benefit analyses for carotid endarterectomy, which are highly sensitive to expected patient survival, might not be pertinent to individual patient situations. Intellectually intact octogenarians without unusually severe comorbidities are good candidates for and should be offered the benefits of carotid endarterectomy.     

Carotid endarterectomy in women: challenging the results from ACAS and NASCET

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the short- and long-term outcomes in female and male patients after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Randomized carotid trials have clearly shown the benefits of CEA in specific symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. However, the short- and long-term benefits in women appear to be less clear, and the role of CEA among women with carotid disease remains uncertain. METHODS: During a 21-year period, 1,204 CEAs were performed, 464 (39%) in women and 739 (61%) in men. Complete follow-up was available in 70% of patients. RESULTS: Women were less likely to have evidence of coronary artery disease, were more likely to be hypertensive, and had a significantly greater incidence of diabetes. The mean age at CEA was 68.5 +/- 9.5 years for women and 68.0 +/- 8.5 years for men. There were no significant differences in the use of shunts, patching, tacking sutures, or severity of carotid stenoses between men and women. Surgical death rates were nearly identical for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Perioperative stroke rates were similar for asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Life-table stroke-free rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were similar for asymptomatic women and men and symptomatic women and men. Long-term survival rates at 1, 5, and 8 years were higher for asymptomatic women compared with men and for symptomatic women compared with men. As a result, stroke-free survival rates at these follow-up intervals were greater for asymptomatic women compared with men, and for symptomatic women compared to men. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study challenge the conclusions from the Asymptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Study and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial regarding the benefits of CEA in women. Female gender did not adversely affect early or late survival, stroke-free, or stroke-free death rates after CEA. The authors conclude that CEA can be performed safely in women with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid artery disease, and physicians should expect comparable benefits and outcomes in women and men undergoing CEA.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the awake patient

The advantages of performing carotid endarterectomy in the awake patient have been presented based on a 13 year experience. Anesthesia consisted of either local infiltration of local lidocaine or regional neck block supplemented by intravenous sedation. The principal advantages of the technique are that it is the only exact method of assessing the need for an intraluminal shunt by neurologic assessment of the awake patient during trial carotid cross-clamping, and the elimination of general anesthesia allows carotid endarterectomy to be safely performed on patients with advanced inoperable coronary artery disease and in those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. One hundred consecutive carotid endarterectomies have been reported with one late death and one mild, permanent neurologic deficit. These results support the belief that carotid endarterectomy can be performed with very low morbidity and mortality rates by operating on the awake patient.     

Carotid endarterectomy: the financial impact of practice changes

PURPOSE: New techniques in the management of extracranial carotid occlusive disease have focused attention on the outcome and economics of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Changing practice patterns for CEA must be assessed to allow accurate comparisons. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of practice modifications related to CEA on patient outcome and cost data. METHODS: Data on patients undergoing CEAs at a single institution from fiscal year 1992 to 1998 were prospectively collected and entered into a computerized database. Records were reviewed for patient demographics and outcome with regard to stroke and death. Selected years that corresponded to transitions in perioperative management were audited for complete hospital financial information from. RESULTS: We performed 960 CEAs during the study period, with a combined stroke and death rate of 1.1%. Inflation-adjusted hospital costs per patient in 1998 dollars for the years 1992, 1996, and 1998 were $5494, $4476, and $3350, respectively. In 1998, costs for patients who required arteriography were $1825 greater than those operated on during duplex scan examination alone in 1998. Statistically significant differences occurred in the year-to-year comparisons in the use of arteriography, intensive care unit monitoring, same day admissions, and length of stay. There were no statistically significant differences in the stroke and death rate between years. CONCLUSION: Practice changes related to CEA have resulted in significant savings without detriment in patient outcome. Comparisons between CEA and endovascular techniques will need to be evaluated within this context. Given these advances in perioperative management, it will be difficult to justify carotid stenting on the basis of current economic considerations.     

Carotid endarterectomy in a metropolitan community: comparison of results from three institutions

The hospitalizations of 300 patients who had carotid endarterectomies (CEA) in three different kinds of hospital were analyzed. 100 patients had CEA performed by experienced vascular surgeons in a university hospital (UH), 100 patients had CEA performed by experienced vascular surgeons in private community hospitals (PCH), and 100 patients had CEA performed by senior general surgery residents (GSR) assisted by experienced vascular surgeons in a university-affiliated Veterans Administration hospital (VA). Analysis of patient characteristics revealed that, compared with the other groups, VA patients were (1) younger (62 +/- 7 years; p less than 0.001); (2) had a higher frequency of peripheral vascular operations (51%; p less than 0.01; (3) were more often cigarette smokers (84%; p less than 0.001); and (4) had more contralateral carotid occlusions (19%) and ulcerated lesions (73%) (p less than 0.01). GSR had longer operating room times and cerebral ischemia times during shunt insertion and removal (6 +/- 2.8 minutes) and during the CEA (30 +/- 27 minutes) (p less than 0.001). Postoperative hypertension and neck hematomas were less common in PCH patients (p less than 0.001) than in the other groups. Although their duration of hospitalization (17 +/- 12 days) was longer, the VA patients experienced no increased morbidity. There was a high rate of cranial nerve injury in all groups (27%, 15%, 17%) but symptoms were not often permanent (9%, 6%, 6%). Our data indicate that results of vascular operations performed by well-supervised residents are comparable in all important respects to those performed by fully trained surgeons.     

Carotid endarterectomy in the elderly population: a statewide experience

The practice of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was examined in all Medicare patients undergoing operation in the state of Kentucky during 1983 and during the first 6 months of 1984. CEA was performed 738 times on 705 patients in 1983 by 98 surgeons in 41 hospitals. The average age of patients was 71 years, and only 15% had no symptoms of carotid disease. The stroke rate was 3.7%, and the combined stroke and mortality rate was 5.7%. In a follow-up period in 1984, the combined stroke and mortality rate was 4.3%. Patients who showed no symptoms of carotid disease had a combined stroke and mortality rate of 2.8%. Surgeons performing fewer than three CEAs per year had a tendency toward a higher complication rate than had surgeons performing more than 12 CEAs a year. Most stroke complications appeared as isolated events and did not seem to represent a practice pattern based on our follow-up into 1984.     

Comparative outcomes analysis of procedures performed in physician offices and ambulatory surgery centers

HYPOTHESIS: This study compared outcomes to determine whether patient safety is similar in Florida ambulatory surgery centers and offices. DATA SOURCES: All adverse incident reports to the Florida Board of Medicine for procedure dates April 1, 2000, to April 1, 2002 were reviewed. The numbers of office procedures performed during a 4-month period were used to estimate the total number of procedures. Ambulatory surgery death summaries, adverse incident data, and volumes of procedures for 2000 were procured from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration. STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION: Adverse incident reports were reviewed by multiple parties; only reports that involved an office surgical procedure and resulted in injury or death were included in the outcomes calculation. Reports were extracted independently by multiple reviewers. DATA SYNTHESIS: Adverse incidents occurred at a rate of 66 and 5.3 per 100,00 procedures in offices and ambulatory surgery centers, respectively. The death rate per 100,000 procedures performed was 9.2 in offices and 0.78 in ambulatory surgery centers. The relative risks for injuries and deaths for office procedures vs ambulatory surgery centers were 12.4 (95% confidence interval, 9.5-16.2) and 11.8 (95% confidence interval, 5.8-24.1), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this review of surgical procedures performed in offices and ambulatory surgery centers in Florida during a recent 2-year period, there was an approximately 10-fold increased risk of adverse incidents and death in the office setting. If all office procedures had been performed in ambulatory surgery centers, approximately 43 injuries and 6 deaths per year could have been prevented.     

Carotid endarterectomy without a shunt: the control series

Nine hundred forty carotid endarterectomies were performed without the use of a temporary indwelling shunt. Six patients (0.6%) died, all from stroke; 17 other patients (1.8%) had another stroke, and 21 patients (2.2%) had temporary neurologic symptoms. Complete x-ray films detailing the opposite internal carotid artery and carotid artery back pressure were available for 783 operations. Correlation of stroke to back pressure, status of the contralateral internal carotid artery, preoperative neurologic deficit, and carotid clamp time was examined. Statistical analysis demonstrated significantly increased neurologic complications only if the systolic carotid back pressure was less than or equal to 50 mm Hg or the contralateral internal carotid artery was occluded. Analysis to determine if these factors were dependently related showed that when both a contralateral carotid occlusion and a carotid back pressure of less than or equal to 50 mm Hg coexisted (82 patients), the rate of permanent deficit was 11.0% compared with 2.8% when either factor was singly present and 0.9% when neither factor was present. No statistical difference exists between the group with only a single factor and those with neither factor. When a temporary shunt is not used during carotid endarterectomy, the risk of neurologic complication is increased if both a contralateral internal carotid artery occlusion and a carotid back pressure of less than or equal to 50 mm Hg coexist. The use of a shunt in this patient population may be beneficial.