Comparison of the dexamethasone-suppressed corticotropin-releasing hormone test and low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

CONTEXT: The low-dose dexamethasone suppression test (LDDST) is widely used in confirming a diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. CRH administration at the end of an LDDST has been reported to improve the diagnostic accuracy of this test. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to assess whether CRH administration after a standard LDDST (LDDST-CRH test) improves diagnostic accuracy in Cushing's syndrome. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-six individuals with a clinical suspicion of Cushing's syndrome each completed a standard LDDST and an LDDST-CRH test at Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London. The LDDST involved administration of 0.5 mg oral dexamethasone given 6-hourly for 48 h. Serum cortisol was measured 6 h after the last dose of dexamethasone, with a value of 50 nmol/liter or below excluding Cushing's syndrome. Immediately after this, the LDDST-CRH test commenced with administration of a ninth dose of 0.5 mg dexamethasone. Exactly 2 h later, 100 mug human-sequence CRH was administered. Serum cortisol was measured 15 min after the CRH injection, with a value of less than 38 nmol/liter also excluding Cushing's syndrome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Diagnosis or exclusion of Cushing's syndrome was the main outcome measure. RESULTS: Twelve subjects were diagnosed with Cushing's syndrome (eight Cushing's disease and four primary adrenal). The sensitivity of the LDDST in diagnosing Cushing's syndrome was 100%, with a specificity of 88%. In contrast, although the sensitivity of the LDDST-CRH test was also 100%, specificity was reduced at 67%. These results give a positive predictive value of 80% for the LDDST and 60% for the LDDST-CRH test. CONCLUSION: This small study suggests that the addition of CRH to the LDDST does not improve the diagnostic accuracy of the standard LDDST in Cushing's syndrome.     

An overnight high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for rapid differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

We have developed a high-dose dexamethasone suppression test that can be administered overnight with a single 8-mg dose and used the new procedure in the differential diagnosis of 83 patients with Cushing's syndrome. In 76 patients with surgically or pathologically proven cause--60 with Cushing's disease, 7 with the ectopic adrenocorticotrophic hormone syndrome, and 9 with adrenal tumors--suppression of plasma cortisol levels to less than 50% of baseline indicated a diagnosis of Cushing's disease. The test had a sensitivity of 92%, a specificity of 100%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 93%. These values equal or exceed those of the standard 2-day test whether based on suppression of urinary 17-hydroxycorticosteroids or plasma cortisol. We conclude that this overnight, high-dose dexamethasone suppression test is practical and reliable in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.     

The ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation test and the dexamethasone suppression test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

We gave a standard dexamethasone suppression test and an ovine corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation test to 41 patients with adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH)-dependent hypercortisolism to determine the efficacy of each test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome. Twenty-nine of thirty-three patients with Cushing's disease and 0 of 8 patients with ectopic secretion of ACTH responded to the ovine CRH test with increased levels of cortisol. When a cortisol response was judged as positive for Cushing's disease, the CRH test had a diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 88%, 100%, and 90%, respectively. Twenty-nine patients with Cushing's disease and 1 patient with ectopic secretion of ACTH responded to the dexamethasone suppression test. A combined-test strategy requiring negative results from both tests to exclude a diagnosis of Cushing's disease yielded superior sensitivity (100%) and diagnostic accuracy (98%). Thus, the ovine CRH test works as well as the standard dexamethasone suppression test in discriminating between Cushing's disease and ectopic ACTH secretion. The diagnostic power of each test is enhanced when the two tests are combined.     

The value of the low-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the differential diagnosis of hyperandrogenism in women

We studied 211 hyperandrogenic women with respect to clinical presentation, basal androgen levels, and the degree of cortisol and androgen suppression during a 48-h low-dose (2 mg) dexamethasone-suppression test (LDDST) to exclude ovarian and adrenal tumors. In 42 women with elevated testosterone levels, 21 of whom failed to suppress testosterone during the LDDST, the response of serum androgen levels during a 4-wk administration of 7.5 mg prednisolone in a reverse circadian regimen was also assessed. These results were compared with an additional 17 patients with histologically proven androgen-secreting tumors. Clinical presentation alone was suggestive of a virilizing tumor in 70% of patients with tumors. Serum testosterone, although occasionally only marginally elevated, was the sole androgen that was elevated in every patient with a tumor. After the LDDST, none of the patients with tumors obtained either a greater than 40% reduction or normalization of the previously elevated testosterone levels, whereas 88% of patients with nontumorous hyperandrogenism showed either normalization or suppression of more than 40%. With one exception, all of the patients with nontumorous hyperandrogenism who showed inadequate suppression of testosterone during the LDDST, and were treated with prednisolone, normalized the previously elevated androgens after 1 month of administration. In summary, in women presenting with hyperandrogenism, lack of testosterone suppression during the LDDST is associated with 100% sensitivity and 88% specificity in distinguishing patients with ovarian and adrenal androgen-secreting tumors from patients with nontumorous hyperandrogenism in this small series. The LDDST is an easy to perform screening test that can also identify causes of hyperandrogenism due to altered glucocorticoid secretion.     

The continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test in the differential diagnosis of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: A recent report showing disappointingly low sensitivity and specificity for the oral high dose dexamethasone test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome prompted us to re-evaluate the results obtained in our centre using the continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test for this purpose. PATIENTS: 105 patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome were included in this study; 78 with Cushing's disease, 8 with ectopic ACTH-secreting tumours and 19 were classified as 'of unknown aetiology'. RESULTS: In 74/78 (94.9%) of patients with Cushing's disease and in 3/8 (37.5%) patients with the ectopic ACTH syndrome, a plasma cortisol decrease > 190 nmol/l at 7 h as compared to baseline values was achieved in the continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test. Using a plasma cortisol decrease > 190 nmol/l at 7 h as compared to baseline values as the cut-off value, the sensitivity and specificity of the continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test for the diagnosis of Cushing's disease in patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome were 94.9% and 62.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome with a plasma cortisol decrease > 190 nmol/l at 7 h in the continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test, additional localizing investigations such as bilateral simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling and/or pentetreotide scintigraphy should be performed when no clearly discernible pituitary adenoma is observed on MRI studies. Patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome with a plasma cortisol decrease < 190 nmol/l at 7 h in the continuous 7-hour intravenous dexamethasone suppression test should also undergo bilateral simultaneous inferior petrosal sinus sampling and/or pentetreotide scintigraphy to demonstrate the presence of a nonpituitary source of ACTH overproduction.     

Nocturnal high-dose dexamethasone suppression test in the aetiological diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

Seventeen patients with well-proven Cushing's syndrome (13 with Cushing's disease, 3 with adrenal tumour and 1 presenting ectopic ACTH syndrome caused by bronchial carcinoid) were investigated by using a single-dose 8 mg dexamethasone nocturnal test. The results obtained were compared with those of the classical 8 mg Liddle's test, metyrapone stimulation, plasma ACTH concentration and with the final diagnosis reached through surgery, pathologic anatomy, and/or clinical and biochemical follow-up of the patients after treatment. The diagnostic efficacy or the predictive power of the test (defined as the ratio between the number of cases in which the diagnosis was correctly predicted and the total number of cases), was at least 82.4% vs 84.6% for the classical 8 mg Liddle's test. This percentage increased to 94.1% when the results of repeated tests on three patients with conflicting data were included. It is concluded that the nocturnal high-dose dexamethasone suppression test is a valuable tool in the aetiological diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.     

The low-dose dexamethasone suppression test: a reevaluation in patients with Cushing's syndrome

Low-dose dexamethasone suppression testing has been recommended for biochemical screening when Cushing's syndrome is suspected. The criterion for normal suppression of cortisol after dexamethasone is controversial. To assess diagnostic utility (sensitivity), we report the results of low-dose dexamethasone suppression testing in 103 patients with spontaneous Cushing's syndrome. There were 80 patients with Cushing's disease (78%), 13 with the ectopic ACTH syndrome (13%), and 10 with cortisol-producing adrenocortical adenomas (10%). Fourteen (18%) of 80 patients with Cushing's disease suppressed serum cortisol to less than 5 micro g/dl (<135 nmol/liter) after the overnight 1-mg test, whereas six patients (8%) actually showed suppression of serum cortisol to less than 2 micro g/dl (<54 nmol/liter). In addition, the 2-d, low-dose dexamethasone suppression test yielded false-negative results in 38% of patients when urine cortisol was used and 28% when urinary 17-hydroxycorticosteroids were used. Serum cortisol after the 1-mg test correlated with baseline urinary free cortisol (r = 0.705, P < 0.001), plasma ACTH level (r = 0.322, P = 0.001), and urinary free cortisol after the 2-d test (r = 0.709, P = 0.001). This study provides evidence that low-dose dexamethasone may suppress either plasma cortisol or urinary steroids to levels previously thought to exclude Cushing's syndrome and that these tests should not be used as the sole criterion to exclude the diagnosis of endogenous hypercortisolism.     

过夜小剂量地塞米松抑制试验对库欣综合征诊断价值的再探讨

目的重新探讨过夜小剂量地塞米松抑制试验对库欣综合征的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析我院1990年1月到2005年7月收治的52例库欣综合征患者和153例经住院检查排除库欣综合征的肥胖症和高血压病患者，比较过夜小剂量（1mg）地塞米松抑制试验的不同血清皮质醇切点对库欣综合征诊断的敏感性和特异性。结果在过夜1mg地塞米松抑制试验中，以试验当日晨8：00血清皮质醇为基础值，次日8：00血清皮质醇为基础值的50％以及次日晨8：00血清皮质醇275、200、138和50nmol／L为切点，诊断库欣综合征的敏感性分别为92．3％、92．3％、92．3％、92．3％和100．0％，特异性分别为90．8％、98．7％、96．1％、91．5％和78．4％。结论在过夜1mg地塞米松抑制试验中，以次日晨8：00血清皮质醇50nmol／L为切点具有较高的敏感性，可作为库欣综合征的第一线筛选试验。     

A dose-response study of salivary cortisol after dexamethasone suppression test in Cushing's disease and its potential use in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

OBJECTIVE: A dose-response study with different doses of dexamethasone (dex) to assess the corticotrophic resistance in Cushing's disease (CD) using salivary cortisol as an end point has not yet been evaluated. We also reported our experience with salivary cortisol compared to plasma cortisol determination during dex suppression test (DST) and after ovine corticotrophin release hormone (oCRH) test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome (CS). DESIGN: We studied 46 patients with CS, including 28 patients with CD, 16 with adrenal disease and two with occult ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) tumours. Salivary cortisol was compared to plasma cortisol and ACTH during a DST 2 mg for 2 days, 8 mg for 2 days and 24 mg for 1 day, and after oCRH test. RESULTS: We observed a dose-dependent suppression of salivary cortisol, plasma cortisol and ACTH in CD patients. Salivary cortisol presented a higher percentage of suppression than plasma cortisol: 42% vs. 15% (P < 0.002), 82% vs. 67% (P < 0.002) and 90% vs. 83% (P < 0.03) after 2, 8 and 24 mg/day dex, respectively. The lowest percentage of suppression was observed for plasma ACTH. The parallelism of these lines identified that the criterion of 65% suppression of salivary cortisol corresponding to 50% suppression of plasma cortisol after 8 mg/day for 2 days is consistent with CD. The sensitivity and specificity using 50% suppression for plasma cortisol were 81% and 83%, respectively, for 8 mg DST. Using the criterion of 65% suppression of salivary cortisol, the sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 100%, respectively, for 8 mg DST. After oCRH test the sensitivity and specificity were 86% and 91%, respectively, for ACTH, 100% and 64%, respectively, for plasma cortisol and 93% and 91%, respectively, (20% of increment) or 86% and 100%, respectively, (35% increment) for salivary cortisol. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, salivary cortisol presents more profound suppression than plasma cortisol or ACTH in a dose-response pattern after different doses of dex in patients with CD. In addition, our data suggest that measurement of salivary cortisol might improve the DST as compared to plasma cortisol in the differential diagnosis of CS.     

The superiority of the metyrapone test versus the high-dose dexamethasone test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

Differentiating the cause of Cushing's syndrome traditionally has depended upon measuring the response of 24-hour urine samples of cortisol or glucocorticoid metabolites to the high-dose (8 mg per day) dexamethasone test. The metyrapone test, however, is more convenient because it is a shorter test and requires the obtainment of serum samples, which can be collected more simply and more reliably than 24-hour urine samples. The usefulness of these two tests has not been adequately evaluated in a large series of patients with Cushing's syndrome. This study prospectively evaluated the accuracy of the dexamethasone and metyrapone tests in determining the cause of Cushing's syndrome in a series of 25 unselected patients. The diagnostic accuracy of these tests was calculated as follows: diagnostic accuracy = true positives and true negatives/study population X 100. Results of this study demonstrated that the metyrapone test was more accurate than the dexamethasone test in differentiating Cushing's disease from adrenocortical neoplasm (diagnostic accuracy, 100 percent versus 81 percent). All patients with Cushing's disease had a normal postmetyrapone 11-deoxycortisol concentration (greater than 10 micrograms/dl), while all patients with adrenocortical neoplasm had a suppressed 11-deoxycortisol concentration (less than 10 micrograms/dl). Thus, this study demonstrates that the metyrapone test is superior to the high-dose dexamethasone test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.     

The desmopressin stimulation test in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome

objective We assessed the ability of desmopressin to stimulate the pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with Cushing's syndrome. DESIGN AND SUBJECTS The Cortisol response to 5 or 10 fig of intravenous desmopressin was evaluated in 31 patients with Cushing's syndrome of several aetiologies and in 15 normal subjects. RESULTS Cortisol responses were observed in 15 out of 16 patients with pituitary dependence and in two patients with adrenal nodular hyperplasia, the increase above baseline ranging from 61 to 379% in the responders. Eight patients with adrenal tumours and one with the ectopic ACTH syndrome did not respond to desmopressin, having shown changes In their Cortisol levels from -5 to 42% above baseline. Responses occurred in two out of the 15 normal Individuals, whose Cortisol increased 58 and 69% above baseline, respectively. Stimulation tests with standard agents as lysine vasopressin or ovine corticotrophin-releasing hormone were performed in the same patients and there was a high degree of concordance. No serious adverse reactions were observed in the tests with desmopressin. CONCLUSIONS Desmopressin was able to stimulate the pituitary-adrenal axis in patients with Cushing's disease and, like corticotrophin releasing hormone, it may prove useful in the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.     

Urine free cortisol in the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test for the differential diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To develop criteria for interpreting the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test using urine free cortisol as an end point for the differential diagnosis of the Cushing syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: Inpatient research ward. PATIENTS: Patients (118) with surgically confirmed causes of the Cushing syndrome: 94 with pituitary disease, 14 with primary adrenal disease, and 10 with ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) secretion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were determined for the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test using urine free cortisol and using 17-hydroxysteroid excretion. For each analysis, patients with pituitary disease were considered to be "diseased" and patients with nonpituitary disease were considered to be "non-diseased". The level of suppression that gave 100% specificity was determined for each steroid. RESULTS: The accuracy of urine free cortisol when used as an end point in the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test was equivalent to that of 17-hydroxysteroid excretion. At all levels of sensitivity and specificity, however, the degree of suppression of urine free cortisol used for the diagnosis of pituitary disease was greater than that of 17-hydroxysteroid excretion. The likelihood ratios for pituitary disease based on urine free cortisol suppression of greater than 50%, of greater than 80%, and of greater than 90% were 4.2, 10.1, and "infinite," respectively. Suppression of urine free cortisol greater than 90% or suppression of 17-hydroxysteroid excretion greater than 64% was associated with 100% specificity. When these criteria were combined, the percentage of correct predictions (102 of 118 [86%; 95% CI, 78% to 92%]) was higher than that obtained using either steroid alone (89 of 118 [75%; CI, 65% to 83%]) (P = 0.009) and higher than that obtained using the traditional criterion of 50% suppression for 17-hydroxysteroid excretion (95 of 118 [80%; CI, 71% to 87%]) (P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: In the high-dose dexamethasone suppression test, the degree of suppression of urine free cortisol used for the diagnosis of pituitary disease is greater than that traditionally used for 17-hydroxysteroid excretion. The diagnostic performance of the test is improved by measuring both urine free cortisol and 17-hydroxysteroid excretion and by requiring greater suppression of both steroids.