Cross-over comparison of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release with blind 24 h ambulatory blood pressure assessments

1. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of nifedipine Oros and felodipine extended release (ER) in controlling 24 h ambulatory blood pressures (ABP) in hypertensive patients. 2. The study was a randomized cross-over design with a 2 week open placebo run-in phase and two observer-blind treatment periods. 3. Subjects were males and females, aged between 18 and 65 years, suffering from mild to moderate essential hypertension with a sitting mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) within the range of 95-114 mmHg. Twenty-three subjects were randomized to treatment; 15 patients completed the study. 4. Treatment intervention was 2 weeks of placebo followed by either 30 mg nifedipine OROS once daily or 5 mg felodipine ER once daily for 6 weeks, which was titrated up to 60 mg nifedipine OROS daily or 10 mg felodipine ER daily after 2 weeks of treatment on the lower doses if the DBP was > 90 mmHg. The main outcome measure was 24 h ABP after 6 weeks of active treatment, evaluated by an independent observer blinded as to treatment allocation. 5. Compared with placebo, mean (+/- SD) 24 h DBP was reduced by 6.2 +/- 6.8 and 5.2 +/- 5.1 mmHg after nifedipine and felodipine, respectively. The 24 h mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) fell by 11.8 +/- 10.9 and 10.1 +/- 8.2 mmHg for nifedipine and felodipine, respectively, compared with placebo. There were no significant differences between the two active treatments in the reduction of DBP or SBP during the 24 h period, daytime or night-time. 6. Similar antihypertensive effects are achieved with nifedipine Oros and felodipine ER when doses are individually titrated, with no significant differences between the two treatments.     

Control of hypertension in elderly patients with felodipine and metoprolol: a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

1. Forty-nine patients aged 65-80 years, whose Phase V diastolic blood pressure (dBP) was above 95 mmHg after 4 weeks open treatment with metoprolol 50 mg twice daily were randomized to receive, double-blind, the calcium antagonist felodipine (n = 32) 2.5 mg twice daily or placebo (n = 17) in addition to metoprolol for 2 weeks. If the dBP remained greater than 95 mmHg, the dose of felodipine or placebo was doubled for a further 2 weeks; if the dBP was still greater than 95 mmHg, the dose of felodipine was doubled again to 10 mg twice daily or the corresponding placebo dose given. The duration of the double-blind period was 6 weeks, all patients receiving metoprolol 50 mg twice daily throughout. 2. At the end of the double-blind period, the seated dBP was reduced from 103 +/- 5 (mean +/- s.d.) to 88 +/- 7 mmHg (P less than 0.001) by felodipine and from 105 +/- 100 +/- 11 mmHg (NS) by placebo. The differences between these reductions (P less than 0.01) and between the final dBPs (P less than 0.001) were significant. Eighty-nine per cent of patients receiving felodipine and 33% of those receiving placebo (P less than 0.001) had controlled (dBP less than or equal to 95 mmHg) BPs. Half (14/27 completing) of the patients receiving felodipine required 2.5 mg throughout; 9/27 needed 5 mg and 4/27 10 mg twice daily. Adverse events occurred with equal frequency in the two groups, but the profile was different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Felodipine extended release in mild to moderate hypertension

A multi-centre study was carried out to examine the antihypertensive effect and adverse event profile of felodipine in an extended-release (ER) formulation given once daily as monotherapy. Doses of 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg felodipine ER were compared with placebo in 183 patients with mild or moderate hypertension. All antihypertensive medication was discontinued on entering a 4-week placebo run-in period. If, at the end of the run-in period, supine diastolic blood pressure was in the range greater than 95 less than 120 mmHg, patients were randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with felodipine, 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg, or placebo, to be taken once daily for 4 weeks. Supine and standing blood pressure, heart rate and body weight were measured every 2 weeks during the trial. Assessments were made 24 hours after intake of the study drug. Adverse events were recorded at each review. Over the 4-week treatment period, a dose-related decrease in supine diastolic blood pressure was observed, this reduction occurring already during the first 2 weeks of active treatment. In the placebo group and the felodipine 5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg groups, supine blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) decreased by 7/6 mmHg, 9/8 mmHg, 12/10 mmHg and 14/11 mmHg, respectively. Supine diastolic blood pressure reduction in the felodipine 10 mg group and both systolic and diastolic blood pressure reductions in the 20 mg group were significantly greater than with placebo. Standing diastolic blood pressure reduction was significantly greater in all three dose groups on felodipine compared with placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER in mild to moderate essential hypertension

1. The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a low dose combination of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor ramipril (2.5 mg) and the extended release formulation of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist felodipine (5 mg) were assessed in a double-blind, double dummy placebo controlled, randomised, crossover study in 20 patients (mean age 55.4 years; range 46-69) with uncomplicated mild to moderate hypertension (supine diastolic > 90 mmHg < 115 mmHg after 4 weeks of single-blind wash-out on placebo). The four randomised, double-blind, crossover study phases evaluated the response to 4 weeks of once daily treatment with placebo, monotherapy with each drug and the combination. Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (Spacelabs 90207) was performed for 24 h at the end of each phase. 2. The mean 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (mmHg) was 147.9/92.0 following placebo, 141.3/87.8 following monotherapy with ramipril 2.5 mg, 136.8/85.8 following monotherapy with felodipine ER 5 mg and 131.1/82.6 following the combination of ramipril 2.5 mg and felodipine ER 5 mg. All active treatment phases significantly reduced mean 24 h ambulatory diastolic pressure by comparison with placebo. The antihypertensive efficacy of the combination was additive. 3. The coadministration of ramipril did not attenuate the incidence of headache attributable to felodipine ER.     

Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of metoprolol and felodipine in comparison with the individual substances in monotherapy. The Swedish/United Kingdom Study Group.

In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, the aim was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new fixed combination of felodipine and metoprolol with the individual components in monotherapy. After a placebo period of 4 weeks, 159 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized to extended-release formulations of either felodipine plus metoprolol 10 + 100 mg (FM), felodipine 10 mg (F), or metoprolol 100 mg (M) once daily if supine diastolic blood pressure greater than 95 mm Hg. After 12 weeks of active treatment, the reductions in supine blood pressure (24 h after dosing) were 20/14, 13/10, and 11/8 mm Hg for FM, F, and M, respectively. The difference in change was 7/4 mm Hg (p = 0.004/p = 0.006) and 8/5 mm Hg (p = 0.0002/p less than 0.0001) for the fixed combination and F or M, respectively. Blood pressure control (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg after 12 weeks) was significantly better for the combination than for F and M, i.e., 71%, 49% (p = 0.008), and 34% (p = 0.004), respectively. Adverse experiences were those to be expected from previous studies with felodipine and metoprolol and did not differ in frequency between groups. It can be concluded that a fixed combination of metoprolol and felodipine has a clinically relevant and significantly better blood pressure reduction 24 h postdose than the individual substances in monotherapy, without decreased tolerability.     

Nitric oxide, erectile dysfunction and beta-blocker treatment (MR NOED study): benefit of nebivolol versus metoprolol in hypertensive men

1. Hypertensive men treated with beta-blockers frequently complain of erectile dysfunction. The present study investigated the effects of two beta(1)-adrenoceptor-selective antagonists, namely nebivolol and metoprolol, on erectile function in hypertensive men. 2. Male out-patients (age range 40-55 years) with newly diagnosed or existing stage 1 essential hypertension (mean seated systolic blood pressure 140-159 mmHg; diastolic blood pressure 90-99 mmHg) were enrolled in the study. All patients lived in a stable, heterosexual partnership and had no history of sexual dysfunction. After a 2-week placebo run-in period, patients were randomized double-blind to either Treatment group A (comprising nebivolol 5 mg once daily for 12 weeks, followed by placebo for 2 weeks and then metoprolol succinate 95 mg once daily for 12 weeks) or Treatment group B (comprising metoprolol succinate 95 mg for 12 weeks, placebo for 2 weeks and then nebivolol 5 mg for 12 weeks). An international index of erectile function (IIEF) questionnaire and a diary documented patients' sexual function and activity. 3. Nebivolol and metoprolol lowered blood pressure to a similar extent. Metoprolol, but not nebivolol, significantly decreased the IIEF erectile function subscore by 0.92 in the first 8 weeks after onset of beta-blocker treatment. In contrast with metoprolol, nebivolol improved secondary sexual activity scores and other IIEF subscores. 4. Despite similar antihypertensive efficacy of the cardioselective beta(1)-adrenoceptor antagonists nebivolol and metoprolol, nebivolol may offer additional benefits by avoiding erectile dysfunction in male hypertensive patients on long-term beta-adrenoceptor antagonist therapy.     

Enalapril and nifedipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: a 6 month comparison.

1. In a double-blind, randomised, parallel group study, 128 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 125 mm Hg (Phase V) after 2-4 weeks run-in on placebo, received enalapril 10-40 mg once daily (65 patients) or nifedipine retard 10-40 mg twice daily (63 patients), utilising a double dummy technique. Dual target blood pressures were less than 150 mm Hg systolic and less than 90 mm Hg sitting diastolic. Inadequate responders had hydrochlorothiazide 12.5-50 mg once daily added. 2. The 3 h post-dose sitting blood pressures were lowered by 18/14 mm Hg (enalapril) and 20/14 mm Hg (nifedipine), but nifedipine gave greater standing reductions (16/13 mm Hg enalapril, 22/17 mm Hg nifedipine). The dual target blood pressures were achieved by 45% of those taking enalapril monotherapy and 43% of those taking nifedipine monotherapy. At the end of the hydrochlorothiazide phase the dual target pressures were achieved by 63% of the enalapril group and 56% of the nifedipine group. 3. Overall, 17 patients reported adverse events during the placebo run-in. During the active treatment-periods, 42 patients in the enalapril group experienced adverse events, as did 49 of those on nifedipine. Orthostatic effects were confined to those taking enalapril, whereas flushing/erythema, oedema and palpitations were more common in the nifedipine group. 4. Five patients in the enalapril and 14 in the nifedipine groups were withdrawn because of adverse events. One of those withdrawn on enalapril had angioneurotic oedema.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Felodipine ER formulation in the treatment of mild hypertension: efficacy and tolerability vs placebo.

1. Felodipine is a new calcium-antagonist dihydropyridine derivative with a high degree of selectivity for smooth muscle of arteriolar resistance vessels, as opposed to cardiac cells. 2. In this double-blind, cross-over study the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of the new extended release (ER) formulation of felodipine 10 mg, once daily, in patients with mild essential hypertension was evaluated. After a 4-week single-blind placebo period 28 patients (15 males; mean age 48 +/- 12 years) were randomized to receive felodipine 10 mg ER once daily or placebo for 4 weeks and the alternative treatment for a further 4 weeks. Supine blood pressure and heart rate were measured in the out-patients department every 2 weeks, 22-24 h after the last drug administration. 3. Felodipine 10 mg ER induced a significant reduction in blood pressure in comparison with placebo (from 149 +/- 16/97 +/- 6 to 140 +/- 12/89 +/- 6 mm Hg). Heart rate remained unchanged. Seven patients dropped-out; five during felodipine ER administration and two during placebo. 4. A once daily dose of felodipine ER significantly reduces blood pressure in mild hypertensive patients 22-24 h after administration. It is well tolerated and the adverse events are related to its pharmacodynamic effects.     

Effects of hydrochlorothiazide combined with amiloride in atenolol-resistant hypertensive patients

Twenty hypertensive outpatients WHO stage I or II, with supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mmHg at the end of a 4-week treatment period with atenolol (Tenormin) 100 mg daily, continued atenolol in free association with half a tablet of Moduretic (i.e., hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg + amiloride 2.5 mg) for a further 4 weeks. Atenolol monotherapy induced a drop of systolic blood pressure from 175.0 +/- 11 (mean +/- s.d.) mmHg to 158.7 +/- 6 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and of diastolic blood pressure from 113.5 +/- 8 mmHg to 102.7 +/- 5 mmHg (p less than 0.01). After 4 weeks with atenolol in association with half a tablet of Moduretic, systolic blood pressure further decreased to 145.7 +/- 8 mmHg (p less than 0.01), and diastolic blood pressure to 90.2 +/- 10 mmHg (p less than 0.01). Seven out of 20 patients remained with diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 95 mmHg despite the above combination therapy. In these patients, the doubling of diuretic dose (hydrochlorothiazide 50 mg + amiloride 5 mg) in combination with atenolol resulted in a further drop in systolic pressure (to 142.1 +/- 9 mmHg) and diastolic (to 92.1 +/- 6 mmHg) (both p less than 0.01). Plasma potassium concentration showed a slight and non-significant increase during atenolol monotherapy (from 4.4 +/- 0.5 mEq/l to 4.6 +/- 0.7 mEq/l; n.s.).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension with calcium channel blockers: a multicentre comparison of once-daily nifedipine GITS with once-daily amlodipine

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is one of the most important causes of cardiovascular disease, and treatment of hypertension leads to a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. Although calcium channel blockers are regarded as an important part of the therapeutic armamentarium against cardiovascular diseases, and are among the most frequently prescribed antihypertensive medications, concern has been aroused about these drugs, particularly the short-acting dihydropyrldine derivatives. However, the value of nifedipine GITS(Adalat-Crono), the long-acting dihydropyrldine, is in need of being re-established. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of once-daily nifedipine and amlodipine treatment in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. DESIGN: Randomised multicentre trial with an open comparison of treatments for 12 weeks, with a preceding placebo run-in period of 2 weeks (patients on beta-blockers at the time of enrollment entered a mandatory 2-week wash-out period before being allowed In the placebo run-in period;this wash-out period was one week for patients using any antihypertensive medication other than beta-blockers). SETTING: Nine centres (all university hospitals) in Turkey. PATIENTS: 155 patients with essential hypertension(diastolic blood pressure 95-109 mmHg). INTERVENTIONS: Initial treatment (step 1) consisted of 30 mg nifedipine GlTS (n = 76; (Adalat-Crono tablets), or 5 mg amlodipine (n = 79; Norvasct5-mg tablets), either administered once daily, as a morning dose, or f the blood pressure was not below 140/90 mmHg, or the reduction In diastolic blood pressure was lower than 10 mmHg after a treatment period of 6 weeks, the dose was increased (Step 2) to 60 mg once daily in the nifedipine group, or 10 mg once daily in the amlodipine group. MAIN EFFICACY PARAMETER: Diastolic blood pressure at trough after 12 weeks of active compound therapy adjusted to baseline. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean diastolic blood pressure was 83.1 and 81.9 mmHg,in the nifedipine and amlodipine groups, respectively (p = 0.436). The mean decrease in systolic blood pressure (28.5 +/- 11.9 and 28.2 +/- 11.2 mmHg in the nifadipine and amlodipine groups, respectively) and the mean decrease in diastolic blood pressure (16.4A +/- 7.0 and 17.5 +/- 6.9 mmHg in the nifedipine and amlodipine groups, respectively), as well as the responder rates (88.1%and 92.1%, in the nifediplne and amlodipine groups, respectively) were comparable at the end of the study. No significant differences between groups were detected In the efficacy parameters assessed in this study. Both drugs were well tolerated. The overall incidence of adverse events was 7.9% in the nifadipine group and 10.1% In the amlodipine group. However, more patients discontinued treatment prematurely in the amlodipine group (13 patients; 19.7%), than in the nifedipine group (four patients; 5.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that once-daily nifedipine in GITS formation and amlodipine are comparably safe and effective treatment options in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.     

A double-blind comparison of felodipine and hydrochlorothiazide added to metoprolol to control hypertension

Summary Seventy-six uncomplicated hypertensive patients treated in General Practice, whose seated diastolic blood pressure (Phase V) (dBP) remained 95 mmHg after a minimum of 4 weeks treatment with metoprolol 50 mg b.i.d. as antihypertensive monotherapy, were randomized to receive the selective calcium antagonist felodipine 5 mg b.i.d. or hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg b.i.d. in addition to metroprolol 50 mg b.i.d. The trial duration was 8 weeks, the dose of the felodipine or hydrochlorothiazide being doubled after 4 weeks if control of BP (dBP <90 mmHg) was not achieved on the initial doses.Over the trial period of 8 weeks, felodipine reduced dBP from 102 to 85 mmHg and hydrochlorothiazide from 101 to 91 mmHg; the dBP reduction in the felodipine group was greater than that in the hydrochlorothiazide group (17 vs 9 mmHg) and the attained dBP lower in the felodipine group. About half of the patients in each group required the higher dose.Both regimes were effective and well tolerated. In the dosages used, felodipine was a slightly more effective antihypertensive drug than hydrochlorothiazide when added to metoprolol. There was no apparent difference in the tolerability of the two regimes.     

Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in cardiovascular disorders.

Felodipine is a vascular-selective, dihydropyridine calcium antagonist previously investigated as a conventional tablet formulation administered twice daily. More recently considerable experience has been gained with an extended release (ER) formulation which has the convenience of once daily administration. Felodipine ER has been well studied in patients with essential hypertension. As monotherapy in mild to moderate essential hypertension, felodipine ER is at least as effective in reducing blood pressure as other calcium antagonists, beta-blockers, diuretics and ACE inhibitors, with some results favouring felodipine ER at a statistically significant level at the dosages used. It is also effective combined with controlled release metoprolol or enalapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In patients with more severe forms of essential hypertension uncontrolled by beta-blocker and/or diuretic therapy, felodipine ER was effective as an 'add-on' therapy in placebo-controlled trials, and, at the dosages used, more effective than either sustained release nifedipine or nitrendipine. Felodipine produces effective control of blood pressure without negative effects on cardiac performance. In addition to its antihypertensive action, results suggest that felodipine therapy is associated with significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Furthermore, it appears suitable for use in patients with concomitant diabetes, renal dysfunction or asthma, and is also being investigated for use in patients with congestive heart failure or angina pectoris. Felodipine ER is an effective drug for the treatment of all grades of essential hypertension, and can be used both as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive agents. Further clinical experience should fully establish the long term tolerability of felodipine ER and consequently its place in therapy relative to other accepted antihypertensive drugs. However, with the convenience of once daily administration, felodipine ER is a worthwhile innovation in the treatment of hypertension.     

Smooth blood pressure control obtained with extended-release felodipine in elderly patients with hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring

OBJECTIVE: To assess, by smoothness index (SI), distribution of the antihypertensive effect of extended-release (ER) felodipine over 24 hours in elderly patients with hypertension. METHODS: After a 4-week washout phase, 35 elderly patients (mean age 69 +/- 4 years) with mild-to-moderate hypertension received 2 weeks' treatment with ER felodipine 5mg once daily. The dosage of ER felodipine was doubled to 10 mg/day and given for a further 2 weeks in non-responders (sitting clinic blood pressure > 140/90mm Hg). The study had an open-label design with no placebo control. After each period, clinic and ambulatory blood pressures were measured. Trough-to-peak (T/P) ratio was computed by dividing the blood pressure (BP) change at trough (22 to 24 hours after drug intake) by the change at peak (2 adjacent hours with a maximal BP reduction between the second and eighth hour after drug intake). SI was calculated as the ratio between the average of the 24, hourly, treatment-induced BP changes and its standard deviation. RESULTS: After the initial 2-week treatment period, clinic and 24-hour ambulatory BP values were higher in non-responders (145 +/- 11/87 +/- 8 and 135 +/- 17/80 +/- 6mm Hg, respectively) than in responders (133 +/- 6/81 +/- 3 and 130 +/- 9/77 +/- 7mm Hg). In non-responders, clinic and 24-hour BP values were lowered after a further 2 weeks of treatment with ER felodipine 10 mg/day (128 +/- 11/78 +/- 6 and 128 +/- 12/75 +/- 5mm Hg). SI was high in responders (0.8 +/- 0.8/0.7 +/- 0.7 for systolic/diastolic BP) and low in non-responders (0.5 +/- 0.6/0.3 +/- 0.6) during the first 2-week treatment period. It increased in non-responders after an additional 2 weeks of treatment with ER felodipine 10 mg/day (1.0 +/- 0.8/0.7 +/- 0.6). Median T/P ratios were 0.73 and 0.61 (systolic BP and diastolic BP) in responders and 0.41 and 0.61 in non-responders after 2 weeks of treatment. At variance with SI, T/P ratios did not increase in non-responders after doubling the dosage of ER felodipine (0.34 and 0.18). ER felodipine did not increase 24-hour heart rate. A total of nine adverse events were recorded in six patients (17%), but no patients withdrew from the study. CONCLUSION: ER felodipine 5 to 10 mg/day smoothly and safely reduces 24-hour ambulatory BP in elderly patients with hypertension.     

Comparison of once-daily captopril or enalapril in mild essential hypertension

The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a daily low dose of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, captopril or enalapril, in mild essential hypertension. Nine men with seated diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 104 mm Hg on placebo participated in the study. After one month of placebo, captopril 25 mg was administered; blood pressure, heart rate, ACE activity and plasma renin activity were measured hourly for 4 hours. Each patient then received captopril 50 mg once daily for 8 weeks and similar measurements were made 24 hours post-dose every 2 weeks. After another month of placebo, the identical protocol was repeated after enalapril 5 mg. Although blood pressure and ACE activity decreased significantly (P less than 0.05) within 2-4 hours of the acute doses of each inhibitor, neither captopril or enalapril produced significant reductions 24 hours after the small daily dose. Thus, neither ACE inhibitor alone was adequate to control blood pressure in mild hypertension when given once daily during 8 weeks of treatment.     

Felodipine vs hydralazine: a controlled trial as third line therapy in hypertension. Cooperative Study Group.

In a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized, parallel group study one hundred and one patients with supine diastolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 100 mm Hg phase V, despite treatment with atenolol 100 mg plus chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily also received either felodipine 5-20 mg twice daily or hydralazine 25-100 mg twice daily for 6 weeks. Felodipine achieved a lower supine blood pressure (mean +/- s.d. 177/108 +/- 29/8-138/82 +/- 19/8 mm Hg) than hydralazine (174/109 +/- 25/8-149/92 +/- 26/11 mm Hg), (P less than 0.05/P less than 0.001). Felodipine also lowered supine diastolic blood pressure to less than 90 mm Hg more often than hydralazine (42 vs 22 patients, P less than 0.001). The incidence of unwanted effects was similar in both groups. The felodipine treated patients experienced more ankle swelling and flushing than those in the hydralazine group who experienced more headache and minor gastro-intestinal upset.     

A dose-finding, placebo-controlled study on extended-release felodipine once daily in treatment of hypertension

Hypertensive patients received a beta-blocker plus placebo once daily for 4 weeks. If their diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was then 95-115 mm Hg, they were randomized to receive, in addition to the beta-blocker, placebo (n = 36), felodipine-extended release (ER) 10 mg (n = 36), or felodipine-ER 20 mg (n = 37) in a 4-week double-blind parallel-group trial. All medication was administered once daily and, when BP was measured 24 h after the last dose, felodipine-ER 10 mg reduced DBP by 14 +/- 9 mm Hg (mean +/- SD) from a mean of 103 mm Hg and felodipine-ER 20 mg reduced DBP by 18 +/- 9 mm Gg from 101 mm Hg. The reductions in DBP with both doses of felodipine were greater than reductions with placebo (5 +/- 8 mm Hg, from 102 mm Hg--both p less than 0.001). At the end of the study, 21% of patients receiving placebo had a DBP less than or equal to 90 mm Hg. In contrast, 69% of patients receiving felodipine-ER 10 mg and 82% receiving 20 mg attained this level. More than 90% of patients receiving 10 mg felodipine-ER once daily had a reduction in DBP greater than 5 mm Hg 24 h postdose. Felodipine-ER was well tolerated. Felodipine-ER once daily is an effective antihypertensive drug for patients who require therapy in addition to a beta-blocker; the tolerability in this study was good, and a starting dose greater than 10 mg once daily is not indicated.     

Atenolol-nifedipine combinations compared to atenolol alone in hypertension: efficacy and tolerability.

1. In a double-blind, randomised, three-way-crossover study, 25 patients with sitting diastolic blood pressure between 95 and 120 mm Hg (Phase V) after 4 weeks' run-in on atenolol 50 mg twice daily, received atenolol 50 mg twice daily alone, atenolol 50 mg plus nifedipine 20 mg each twice daily and atenolol 50 mg plus nifedipine 40 mg each twice daily in three treatment periods each lasting 4 weeks. 'Washout' periods were not included. 2. The two combination treatment regimes lowered the 12 h post-dose blood pressure more effectively than did atenolol alone, but the high dose nifedipine combination was no more effective than the low dose nifedipine combination. Sitting systolic BP (+/- s.e. mean) at the end of each period was 174 +/- 5 mm Hg after the atenolol run-in, 170 +/- 5 mm Hg with atenolol alone, 156 +/- 5 mm Hg with the low dose combination and 158 +/- 4 mm Hg with the high dose combination. Corresponding diastolic BP readings were 106 +/- 2 mm Hg, 106 +/- 2 mm Hg, 97 +/- 2 mm Hg and 99 +/- 2 mm Hg respectively. 3. Side-effects tended to occur less commonly with the low dose of the fixed combination than with atenolol alone. An increased number of side-effects occurred with the 40 mg twice daily doses of nifedipine, particularly flushing/erythema, oedema of the ankles/feet, and a hot feeling in the legs. These differences did not reach significance. 4. Overall compliance was good (98 +/- 0.7 s.e. mean %) and was similar within the different treatment regimes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The antihypertensive efficacy of nifedipine alone and in combination in general practice

A multi-centre study in general practice involving 3242 hypertensive patients, aged up to 70 years, was carried out to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nifedipine used alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents in step-care treatment. Patients were treated for up to 8 weeks with one of four regimens: nifedipine monotherapy; diuretic and nifedipine; beta-blocker plus nifedipine; and nifedipine added to a combination of diuretic and beta-blocker. All patients received 20 mg nifedipine, in slow-release tablet form, twice daily; at Week 4, dosage was increased to 40 mg twice daily in 8.5% patients because their supine diastolic blood pressure still exceeded 95 mmHg. Changes in mean blood pressure of the total study group for systolic and diastolic, supine and standing, were highly significant both from baseline (Week 0) to Week 4 (p less than 0.0001) and from baseline to Week 8 (p less than 0.0001). Mean blood pressure reduction was 29/18 mmHg supine and 27/18 mmHg standing. Statistical differences in blood pressure response between age, sex and treatment groups were not of clinical significance. Statistically significant reductions in heart rate (mean 1.9 beats/min, p less than 0.001) and body weight (mean 0.48 kg, p less than 0.001) were noted, but were not of clinical relevance. Nifedipine produced a net increase of 12% in side-effects at Week 4 compared to the profile at entry.     

A placebo-controlled dose-response study of felodipine extended release in hypertensive patients

This placebo-controlled study assessed antihypertensive effect and tolerability of two dose levels of an extended release (ER) formulation of felodipine (Plendil), given once daily to patients in primary health care. The patients had mild to moderate hypertension and were randomized to receive felodipine ER (FER) 20 mg (n = 50), FER 10 mg (n = 50), or placebo (n = 51) in a 4-week, double-blind, parallel-group multicenter study. After 4 weeks, the 24-h reduction in supine diastolic BP (DBP) was greater (p less than 0.01) in both FER groups (7 +/- 6 and 8 +/- 5 mm Hg) than in the placebo group (4 +/- 6 mm Hg). The 24-h reduction in supine systolic BP (SBP) was greater (p less than 0.01) in the FER 20-mg group (14 +/- 11 mm Hg), but not in the FER 10-mg group, than in the placebo group (8 +/- 11 mm Hg). No significant difference in blood pressure (BP) was found between FER 10 and 20 mg. Heart rate (HR) did not differ between any of the groups, nor did body weight or routine laboratory parameters. During felodipine treatment, 17 patients (12 receiving FER 20 mg) were withdrawn mostly because of vasodilatory side effects such as headache and ankle edema. We conclude that FER 10 mg and 20 mg once daily had an antihypertensive 24-h effect and that FER 10 mg may be more suitable as initial dose.     

The pharmacokinetics of irbesartan in hypertensive children and adolescents.

An open-label study was conducted to characterize the pharmacokinetics and antihypertensive response to irbesartan in children (1-12 years) and adolescents (13-16 years) with hypertension. Patients received single once-daily oral doses of irbesartan 2 mg/kg (maximum of 150 mg once daily) for 2 to 4 weeks (+/- nifedipine or hydrochlorothiazide). Plasma irbesartan concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography/fluorescence method from blood samples taken predose, up to 24 hours after dosing on Day 1, and up to 48 hours after the final dose. The plasma concentration-time profiles were similar between the 6- to 12-year and the 13- to 16-year age groups and to that previously determined from a study of adult subjects receiving approximately 2 mg/kg (i.e., 150 mg) oral irbesartan once daily. Mean reductions in systolic/diastolic blood pressure were 16/10 mmHg at Day 28 with irbesartan monotherapy (n = 8). Irbesartan was well tolerated and may be a treatment option for pediatric hypertensive patients.