MRI directed bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE: Bilateral chronic high frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has emerged as an appropriate therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson's disease refractory to medical therapy. Advances in neuroimaging and neurophysiology have led to the development of varied targeting methods for the delivery of this treatment. Intraoperative neurophysiological and clinical monitoring is regarded by many to be mandatory for accurate STN localisation. We have examined efficacy of bilateral STN stimulation using a predominantly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-directed technique. METHODS: DBS leads were stereotactically implanted into the STN using an MRI directed method, with intraoperative macrostimulation used purely for adjustment. The effects of DBS were evaluated in 16 patients followed up to 12 months, and compared with baseline assessments. Assessments were performed in both off and on medication states, and were based on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and timed motor tests. Functional status outcomes were examined using the PDQ-39 quality of life questionnaire. A battery of psychometric tests was used to assess cognition. RESULTS: After 12 months, stimulation in the off medication state resulted in significant improvements in Activities of Daily Living and Motor scores (UPDRS parts II and III) by 62% and 61% respectively. Timed motor tests were significantly improved in the off medication state. Motor scores (UPDRS part III) were significantly improved by 40% in the on medication state. Dyskinesias and off duration were significantly reduced and the mean dose of L-dopa equivalents was reduced by half. Psychometric test scores were mostly unchanged or improved. Adverse events were few. CONCLUSIONS: An MRI directed targeting method for implantation of DBS leads into the STN can be used safely and effectively, and results are comparable with studies using intraoperative microelectrode neurophysiological targeting. In addition, our method was associated with an efficient use of operating time, and without the necessary costs of microelectrode recording.     

Quantitative assessments of the effect of bilateral subthalamic stimulation on multiple aspects of sensorimotor function for patients with Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is effective for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Most studies have evaluated the effectiveness of DBS of the STN using clinical motor scores or simple timed tests of motor function. There have been few studies that quantitatively assessed the outcome of STN DBS using multiple testing paradigms. In the current study, 11 patients who had bilateral STN DBS were quantitatively evaluated under four conditions using gait, postural control, and gait initiation. The four conditions included the medication on/stimulation on (M_on/S_on), medication on/stimulation off (M_on/S_off), medication off/stimulation on (M_off/S_on), and medication off/stimulation off (M_off/S_off) conditions. DBS of the STN significantly increased walking speed with and without levodopa, but had no influence on the cadence. The addition of levodopa had a minimal additional effect on walking speed. The effect of STN DBS on gait initiation approached the significant level. The mean values of lateral body sway during quiet standing increased moderately with medication and/or DBS, but the changes were not statistically significant. Future studies need to determine whether or not there is a potential negative effect of STN DBS on the postural control.     

Deep-brain stimulation in the subthalamic nuclei improves balance performance in patients with Parkinson's disease, when tested without anti-parkinsonian medication

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of bilateral deep-brain stimulation (DBS) in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) on balance performance in patients with severe Parkinson's disease (PD), when tested without anti-parkinsonian medication. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients (median age 65 years, range 50-77) were included. Assessments were made after 10-12 h withdrawal of medication, before and 6 and 12 months after surgery. Postoperative evaluations were performed with DBS on and off. Balance performance was evaluated with the Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Motor symptoms and postural stability (item 30) were assessed with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS III). RESULTS: DBS in STN improved balance performance as well as postural stability and motor symptoms significantly (P 相似文献   

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus: effectiveness in advanced Parkinson's disease patients previously reliant on apomorphine

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease previously reliant on apomorphine as their main antiparkinsonian medication. METHODS: Seven patients with motor fluctuations despite optimal medical treatment given as predominantly apomorphine infusion (n=6), or intermittent apomorphine injections (n=1) underwent bilateral STN DBS using frameless stereotactic surgery. Standard assessments of parkinsonism and motor fluctuations, using Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) were performed before and six months after surgery. Assessments were performed both on and off medication, and postoperative with the stimulators switched on and off. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved motor scores (UPDRS III) by 61% when off medication (p<0.05). Clinical fluctuations (UPDRS IV items 36-39) were reduced by 46.2% (p<0.05). Total daily apomorphine dose was reduced by 68.9% (p<0.05) and apomorphine infusion via a pump was no longer required in four patients. There were no operative complications. Two patients required treatment for hallucinations postoperatively but there was no significant change in mini-mental state examination. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced Parkinson's disease, previously reliant on apomorphine, bilateral STN DBS is an effective treatment to reduce motor fluctuations and enable a reduction in apomorphine use.     

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: comparison of pre- and postoperative neuropsychological evaluation.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for the motor symptoms of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The aim of this study was to assess the effect of the bilateral surgical procedure and STN DBS on the neuropsychological functions. Twenty Parkinson's disease patients underwent a neuropsychological assessment before and 6 months after surgery in four different conditions: medication on (with levodopa) and medication off (without levodopa) during the preoperative period, medication on/stimulation on (levodopa plus stimulators switched on) and medication off/stimulation on (stimulators switched on without levodopa) during the postoperative period. We did not find any significant difference in the four conditions for all the neuropsychological tests, confirming the lack of an overall cognitive decline after surgery. From a neuropsychological point of view, these results seem to indicate that bilateral STN DBS is a safe treatment for advanced PD.     

Effect of high‐frequency subthalamic neurostimulation on gait and freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

The aim of this meta‐analysis was to summarize the short‐ and long‐term effects of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN‐DBS) on gait and freezing of gait (FOG) in Parkinson's disease and to detect predictors of post‐stimulation outcome. A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted up to October 2015 using Medline Ovid databases for studies analyzing the effect of bilateral STN‐DBS on FOG and/or gait. Sixteen studies with available data for the gait item (no. 29) of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and six studies with the FOG item (no. 14) were included. Data were summarized for the following follow‐up periods: 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months. For the medication (Med)‐Off/stimulation(Stim)‐On condition compared with baseline Med‐Off, STN‐DBS significantly improved gait on average from 2.43 to 0.96, 2.53 to 1.31 and 2.56 to 1.40 points at 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months, respectively (P < 0.05). Pre‐operative levodopa responsiveness of UPDRS‐III and Med‐Off severity of gait were the predictors of this beneficial effect. STN‐DBS significantly improved FOG for the Med‐Off/Stim‐On condition compared with baseline on average from 2.26 to 0.82, 2.43 to 1.13 and 2.48 to 1.38 points at 6–15, 24–48 and >48 months, respectively (P < 0.05). There was no significant effect in the Med‐On/Stim‐On condition. This meta‐analysis showed a robust improvement of gait and FOG by STN‐DBS for more than 4 years in the Med‐Off/Stim‐On condition. No beneficial effect was found for the On state of medication. Pre‐operative levodopa responsiveness of global motor performance (UPDRS‐III) is the strongest predictor of the effect of deep brain stimulation on gait.     

刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的比较

目的比较脑深部刺激术和毁损术在双侧立体定向手术治疗帕金森病中的优缺点。方法69例帕金森病病人进行了双侧手术治疗,其中同期双侧丘脑底核(STN)脑深部刺激术(DBS)11例,同期一侧苍白球腹后部毁损术(PVP),另一侧STNDBS3例,分期一侧PVP或腹中间核(Vim)毁损术、另一侧STN或VimDBS9例;分期双侧PVP或Vim毁损术41例,同期双侧PVP5例。平均随访9.3个月。结果UPDRS评分显示刺激术和毁损术均能显著改善对侧肢体震颤、僵硬和运动迟缓症状,双侧刺激术还能改善步态和姿势症状,但双侧毁损术可加重语言、吞咽及流涎等症状,并发症较高。结论双侧DBS是具有双侧症状的帕金森病病人手术治疗的最佳术式,双侧毁损术并发症较高,应严格慎重采用。     

Which target for DBS in Parkinson's disease? Subthalamic nucleus versus globus pallidus internus

We selected 14 patients with advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) and examined the clinical effects of STN DBS versus GPi DBS. Nine patients underwent bilateral STN DBS and five underwent bilateral GPi patients. All patients were followed for at least 12 months. The evaluation was performed on and off drug before surgery; on-drug/on-DBS and off-drug/on-DBS at 1, 2, 6 and 12 months after stereotactic surgery. At 1 and 3 months after surgery in off-drug/on-DBS condition, both groups showed an improvement in motor score (UPDRS II). Nevertheless, the results changed after long-term stimulation in the two groups. Chronic STN DBS is superior to GPi DBS in the amelioration of the clinical features and in the decrease of time spent in the off state. The efficacy in reduction of LID was comparable at 1 and 3 months after surgery, but the results were better in STN DBS after chronic stimulation. The L-dopa dose was reduced only in the STN group.     

Chronic inhibition of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has become a popular treatment option for patients suffering from severe Parkinson's disease (PD). Yet the long-term outcome of subthalamic DBS is unknown. A total of 27 patients suffering from severe PD underwent bilateral stereotactic implantation of high-frequency stimulators in the STN. Before surgery and at least annually after surgery they were examined with the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). This study presents the results of a mean 30 months (range 23 to 55) follow-up of these patients. We found stable and significant off medication improvement of motor function by DBS (between 40% and 44% in the UPDRS part III). While on medication there was no significant change in the motor function by DBS. UPDRS part III worsened gradually during the follow-up period, suggesting disease progression. Thirty months postsurgery the UPDRS part II (ADL) was still improved by 17%. There was a lasting decrease in fluctuations by more than 50%, and dyskinesias were reduced by about 70%. Freezing was reduced significantly from 2.2 in the UPDRS part II to 1.2 at the endpoint. The daily levodopa-equivalent dose was reduced by 39% at 12 months and by 30% at 30 months after STN stimulator implantation. Subthalamic DBS improves sustainable motor function in patients with severe Parkinson's disease and leads to a lasting reduction of medication. Limitations of this procedure were found for disturbances of speech and swallowing.     

OFF-off rebound dyskinesia in subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation of Parkinson's disease.

A 61-year-old man with Parkinson's disease (PD), motor fluctuations, and dyskinesias underwent bilateral implantation of deep brain stimulation (DBS) electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN). One month after surgery, DBS was optimized to bilateral monopolar settings at the most proximal electrode just superior to the STN, which improved motor fluctuations and dyskinesias. At several postoperative evaluations off medications overnight, both stimulators were turned off and within 60 seconds he developed severe dyskinesias. When the stimulators were turned back on, the dyskinesias soon resolved. This article is a first report of a unique pattern of rebound-type dyskinesia that occurred in the off medication state produced by stopping STN DBS.     

Different patterns of medication change after subthalamic or pallidal stimulation for Parkinson's disease: target related effect or selection bias?

BACKGROUND: Bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) is favoured over bilateral globus pallidus internus (Gpi) DBS for symptomatic treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) due to the possibility of reducing medication, despite lack of definitive comparative evidence. OBJECTIVE: To analyse outcomes after one year of bilateral Gpi or STN DBS, with consideration of influence of selection bias on the pattern of postsurgical medication change. METHODS: The first patients to undergo bilateral Gpi (n = 10) or STN (n = 10) DBS at our centre were studied. They were assessed presurgically and one year after surgery (CAPIT protocol). RESULTS: Before surgery the Gpi DBS group had more dyskinesias and received lower doses of medication. At one year, mean reduction in UPDRS off medication score was 35% and 39% in the Gpi and STN groups, respectively (non-significant difference). Dyskinesias reduced in proportion to presurgical severity. The levodopa equivalent dose was significantly reduced only in the STN group (24%). This study high-lights the absence of significant differences between the groups in clinical scales and medication dose at one year. In the multivariate analysis of predictive factors for off-state motor improvement, the presurgical levodopa equivalent dose showed a direct relation in the STN and an inverse relation in the Gpi group. CONCLUSION: Differences in the patterns of medication change after Gpi and STN DBS may be partly due to a patient selection bias. Both procedures may be equally useful for different subgroups of patients with advanced PD, Gpi DBS especially for patients with lower threshold for dyskinesia.     

Two‐year follow‐up on the effect of unilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation in highly asymmetric Parkinson's disease

Although bilateral subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) provides greater relief from the symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) than unilateral STN DBS, it has been suggested that unilateral STN DBS may be a reasonable treatment option in selected patients, especially those with highly asymmetric PD. In previous studies on the effect of unilateral STN DBS, the asymmetry of PD symptoms was not prominent and the mean follow‐up durations were only 3 to 12 months. In this study, we report our findings in a series of 8 patients with highly asymmetric PD who were treated with unilateral STN DBS and were followed for 24 months. Serial changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score and subscores in the ipsilateral, contralateral, and axial body parts were analyzed. Unilateral STN DBS improved the UPDRS motor score and the contralateral subscore in the on‐medication state for 5 nonfluctuating patients and in the off‐medication state for 3 fluctuating patients. However, the ipsilateral subscore progressively worsened and reversed asymmetry became difficult to manage, which led to compromised medication and stimulator adjustment. At 24 months, all the patients were considering the second‐side surgery. Our results suggest that bilateral STN DBS should be considered even in highly asymmetric PD. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

脑深部电刺激治疗帕金森病的长期随访研究

目的长期随访一组采用双侧脑深部电刺激(DBS)丘脑底核(STN)的帕金森(PD)病人,为临床研究提供参考。方法 195例PD病人在我院接受了双侧STN-DBS手术。术中采用微电极记录STN的外放电信号,刺激电极测试病人症状改善情况及副反应阈值。分别在术前术后1年、3年和5年采用UPDRS评分评估PD病人"开/关"两种状态下的症状改善程度。结果术前对照,PD病人术后5年"关"状态运动评分改善率为60.3%;日常生活评分的改善率为54.2%。语言是运动评分中唯一没有改善的症状。异动症除外,术后1年"开"状态下运动评分没有显著改善。第1年和第5年"开"状态下运动迟缓、姿势障碍和步僵症状较术前均有加重。术后第5年异动症较术前明显改善。结论 PD病人双侧STN-DBS术后长期随访结果表明,"关"状态下运动评分和"开"状态下异动症均明显改善。术后第1年和第5年比较,行动迟缓、语言、姿势异常、步僵和认知功能的障碍均有加重。     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in a parkinsonian patient with preoperative deficits in speech and cognition: persistent improvement in mobility but increased dependency: a case study.

We report a patient with advanced Parkinson's disease, including severe and frequent off periods with freezing of gait, moderate dysphonia, and some cognitive impairment, who underwent bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation. The patient was followed for 1 year after surgery, showing persistent good mobility without off periods and without freezing, which reverted completely when stopping the stimulation. There was deterioration of cognition as well as increased aphonia and drooling, all of which remained when the stimulation was turned off. The striking improvement in motor symptoms following STN stimulation was not paralleled by improvement in disability, probably as a result of a cognitive decline, suggesting a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease with dementia. We conclude that chronic STN stimulation is efficient in alleviating akinetic motor symptoms including gait freezing; this surgery should be offered before patients start to exhibit speech or cognitive disturbances.     

Comparative effects of unilateral and bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of unilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with bilateral STN DBS in advanced PD. METHODS: Our initial 10 consecutive patients with medication-refractory motor fluctuations and levodopa-induced dyskinesias undergoing chronic bilateral STN DBS underwent a standardized evaluation of unilateral and bilateral STN DBS in the medication-off state 6 to 18 months after electrode implantation. RESULTS: Bilateral STN DBS improved the mean total Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor score by 54%, whereas unilateral stimulation improved motor scores only 23%. Unilateral STN DBS improved postural stability and gait 14%, other axial motor features 19%, and overall parkinsonism in limbs contralateral to stimulation by 46%, including an 86% improvement in contralateral tremor. However, bilateral STN DBS resulted in greater improvement in each of these domains, including limb function, i.e., the reduction in scores from the limbs on one side was greater with bilateral than with unilateral stimulation of the contralateral STN. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral STN DBS improves parkinsonism considerably more than unilateral STN DBS; bilateral simultaneous electrode implantation may be the most appropriate surgical option for patients with significant bilateral disability. Unilateral STN DBS results in moderate improvement in all aspects of off-period parkinsonism and improves tremor as much as is typically reported with DBS of the ventral intermedius nucleus of the thalamus (Vim). For this reason, STN DBS may be a more appropriate choice than Vim DBS or thalamotomy for parkinsonian tremor. Some patients with highly asymmetric tremor-dominant PD might be appropriately treated with unilateral instead of bilateral STN DBS.     

Effects of bilateral stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in patients with severe Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations.

We present the efficacy and side effects of bilateral deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nuclei (STN) performed with a more simplified surgical procedure than described by the Grenoble group. A consecutive series of 26 patients with advanced and levodopa-responsive Parkinson's disease and motor complications was evaluated using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part I-VI, timed tests, and a patient diary for 2 days concerning on-off phenomenon and dyskinesias. At 3 months, evaluation of stimulation by the UPDRS motor score was performed in a double-blind manner and a significant improvement of 57% was found. The results 12 months after surgery off medication showed significant improvement in both UPDRS motor score and activities of daily living of 64% and, on medication, a significant reduction of 86% in duration of dyskinesias and 83% in duration of off-periods. Reduction in medication was less than for other groups, probably because we used smaller doses of levodopa before the operation. No serious side effects were encountered. When the patients are carefully selected and followed up, bilateral DBS of STN is a significant progress in treatment of advanced idiopathic Parkinson's disease with levodopa-induced motor complications.     

Bilateral subthalamic nucleus stimulation in the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease. Five years' personal experience

Background and purposeThe objective of the study was to assess bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) for patients with advanced Parkinson disease (PD).Material and methodsThe study population included 5 patients with bilateral STN DBS who completed a 5-year postoperative follow-up period. In all patients electrodes (Model 3387 or 3389) were stereotactically bilaterally inserted into the STN using a Leksell stereotactic G frame. The clinical rating tests included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and two motor-timed tests derived from CAPIT (rapid movements between two points and stand-walk-sit test). All patients were assessed in off and on condition before implantation and 1, 3 and 5 years in medication on and off condition and stimulation on condition and stimulation off condition. To compare preoperative to postoperative UPDRS scores, only mean values and standard deviations are presented because of the small study population.ResultsThe stimulation effect was noted in the off state, resulting in a 59% improvement in motor scores of UPDRS at 5-year follow-up, when compared to preoperative scores. In the on state the stimulation improved motor scores by 17%. At 5-year follow-up, reduction of daily levodopa dose was 50%.ConclusionsBilateral STN DBS is an effective and safe treatment for patients with advanced PD. Bilateral STN DBS contributes to improvement of parkinsonian symptoms in the off state and levodopa-induced dyskinesia. This can be correlated with a 50% reduction of daily levodopa dose 5 years postoperatively.     

Different cerebral cortical areas influence the effect of subthalamic nucleus stimulation on parkinsonian motor deficits and freezing of gait.

Inconsistent response in freezing of gait (FOG) with levodopa treatment or STN DBS makes the pathogenesis difficult to understand. We studied brain areas associated with the expression of STN DBS effect on parkinsonian motor deficits and FOG. Ten Parkinson's disease patients with typical FOG were included. One month before STN DBS, we performed [(18)F]-deoxyglucose PET scans and measured the UPDRS motor and modified FOG (mFOG) scores during levodopa off and on periods. At two months after STN DBS, same rating scores were measured. The percentage improvement of mFOG and UPDRS motor scores by STN DBS during levodopa off period was calculated. We searched for brain areas in which glucose metabolism correlated with the improvement of mFOG and UPDRS motor scores by DBS. During levodopa off period, STN DBS improved the UPDRS motor scores by 32.3% and the mFOG scores by 56.6%. There was no correlation between the improvements of both scores. The improvement of UPDRS motor score by DBS correlated with the metabolic activities of rostral supplementary motor area (Brodmann's area 8; BA8), anterior cingulate cortex (BA32), and prefrontal cortex (BA9). On the other hand, there was a positive correlation between the improvement of mFOG score by DBS and the metabolic activity of the parietal, occipital, and temporal sensory association cortices. In conclusion, dysfunction of different cerebral cortical areas limits the beneficial effects of DBS on parkinsonian motor deficits and FOG.     

Effects of unilateral subthalamic and pallidal deep brain stimulation on fine motor functions in Parkinson's disease.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective treatment for selected patients with disabling Parkinson's disease (PD). The two main targets are the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the globus pallidus internus (GPi), although it has not been established whether stimulation at one target is superior to the other. This prospective randomized study assessed the effects of unilateral DBS of the STN versus GPi on fine motor skills in 33 patients with advanced PD. Stimulation of either the STN (18 subjects) or GPi (15 subjects) in the off medication state significantly improved movement time and dexterity, but had little or no effect on reaction time. Overall, the extent of improvement did not differ between the two targets. The degree of improvement in movement time, but not dexterity, was correlated with the extent of preoperative medication responsiveness. Our findings suggest that DBS of the STN or GPi results in a similar improvement in hand movements at short-term follow-up. Preoperative medication responsiveness predicts improvement in some but not other motor tasks.     

Apraxia of eyelid opening after subthalamic deep brain stimulation may be caused by reduction of levodopa

Apraxia of eyelid opening (ALO) is an infrequent side effect of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the pathogenesis of ALO after STN DBS is not well understood. We report on two patients who suffered from disabling ALO after bilateral STN DBS. Their ALO improved by resuming the levodopa medication that had been discontinued after the surgery. Although ALO after STN DBS is considered as an adverse effect of STN stimulation, postoperative modification of dopaminergic medication may be a cause of ALO after STN DBS.