Aneurysmal rupture during embolization with Guglielmi detachable coils

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to determinate the frequency, causes, management and outcome of aneurysmal rupture occurring during embolization. We present our experience with this severe and feared complication. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 314 acute cerebral aneurysms that were treated with endovascular coiling. These patients were identified and the management and outcomes were recorded. The literature was reviewed. RESULTS: Six patients had an intraprocedural aneurysmal rupture. This complication occurred sporadically. Prevalence was 1.9%. Of these six, four were women and two were men. The mean age was 68 years (range: 43-74 years). Four aneurysms were located in the anterior circulation and two in the posterior circulation. Perforation occurred during microcatheterization of the aneurysm in one case and during coil deposition in five cases. In these five patients, aneurysmal rupture resulted from detachment of the first coil in three patients and detachment of the third and last coil in two patients. Hemodynamic changes were noted for one patient. The Glasgow Outcome Scale score at last follow-up examination was 1 in three patients and 3 in one patient (fair recovery). Mortality was 33% and morbidity was 16.7%. CONCLUSION: Aneurysmal perforation during embolization is a rare event (1.8 to 4.4%). When perforation is recognized, embolization can be completed immediately with further coil deposition and reversal of anticoagulation therapy.     

Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms by using Guglielmi detachable coils in awake patients: safety and feasibility.

OBJECT: Embolization of intracranial aneurysms performed using Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) is performed with the patient in a state of general anesthesia at most centers. Such an approach does not allow intraprocedural evaluation of the patient's neurological status and carries additional risks associated with general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation. At the authors' institution, GDC embolization of intracranial aneurysms is performed in awake patients after administration of sedative and analgesic agents (midazolam, fentanyl, morphine, and/or hydromorphone). To determine the feasibility and safety of this approach, the authors have retrospectively reviewed their clinical experience. METHODS: The authors reviewed the medical records of all patients in whom GDC embolization for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms was undertaken between February 1, 1990 and October 31, 1999. Clinical presentation, medical comorbidities, anesthetic agents used, intraprocedural complications, and final procedural outcome were recorded for each patient. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization was attempted in the awake patient in 150 procedures. Among 92 procedures for unruptured aneurysms, 75 (82%) were completed without complications. Four procedures were completed with complications. Of the 92 procedures, 13 were aborted due to patient uncooperativeness (one patient), complications (three patients), morphological characteristics of the aneurysm or surrounding vessels that made embolization technically difficult (eight patients), or vasospasm (one patient). Among 58 procedures for ruptured aneurysms, the procedure was completed without complication in 48 cases (83%). The procedure was completed with complications in five cases and two patients required induction of general anesthesia during the procedure. Five procedures were aborted because morphological characteristics of the aneurysm or surrounding vessels made embolization technically difficult (two patients) or because of aneurysm rupture (two patients) or the appearance of a transient neurological deficit (one patient). CONCLUSIONS: Embolization of intracranial aneurysms performed using GDCs in the awake patient appears to be safe and feasible and allows intraprocedural evaluation of the patient. Potential advantages, including decreased cardiopulmonary morbidity rates, shorter hospital stay, and lower hospital costs, still require confirmation by a direct comparison with other anesthetic procedures.     

Clinical and angiographic outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with Matrix detachable coils in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm recurrence is an innate problem in endovascular treatment of aneurysms with coils. A coated coil system named Matrix (Boston Scientific Neurovascular, Fremont, CA), covered with a bioabsorbable polymeric material (polyglycolide/lactide copolymer [PGLA]), was developed to accelerate intraaneurysmal clot organization and fibrosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Matrix detachable coils in patients with intracranial aneurysms and aneurysmal recurrence rate. METHODS: In a regional neurosurgical center in Hong Kong, data of patients undergoing endovascular embolization of intracranial aneurysm was collected. In a 20-month period, 42 patients with 44 aneurysms were treated by endovascular embolization using matrix coils alone or mixed with bare platinum coils. Thirty-four patients presented with ruptured aneurysms, and 8 patients presented with unruptured aneurysms. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients (60%) had 6-month follow-up DSA, and 10 patients (24%) had 18-month follow-up DSA. Seven aneurysm recurrences were identified, amounting to 16% for all aneurysms and 14% for ruptured aneurysms. Four patients were treated by repeated embolization, and 2 patients were treated by microsurgical clipping. Two adverse events due to thromboembolism were noted. One 78-year-old lady with poor-grade subarachnoid hemorrhage treated by partial embolization died from rebleed at day 4. Another patient with partial embolization and spontaneous thrombosis of dorsal wall ICA aneurysm died at 2 months with aneurysm recanalization with rerupture. Twenty-six patients achieved favorable outcome (GOS score 4 or 5) at last follow-up. The aneurysm recurrence rate using bare platinum coils of the same center was 11% and 7% for all aneurysms and ruptured aneurysms, respectively. CONCLUSION: Matrix coil embolization was safe, but there was no reduction in aneurysm recurrence using matrix coils alone or mixed with GDCs, compared with GDCs alone.     

Association of endovascular therapy of very small ruptured aneurysms with higher rates of procedure-related rupture

OBJECT: Procedure-related rupture during endovascular therapy of intracranial aneurysms is associated with a mortality rate of more than one third. Previously ruptured aneurysms are a known risk factor for procedure-related rupture. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether very small, ruptured aneurysms are associated with more frequent intraprocedural ruptures. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study in which the investigators examined consecutive ruptured aneurysms treated with coil embolization at a single institution. The study was approved by the institutional review board. Very small aneurysms were defined as < or = 3 mm. Procedure-related rupture was defined as contrast extravasation during treatment. Univariate analysis with the Fisher exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test was performed. RESULTS: Between August 1992 and January 2007, 682 aneurysms were selectively treated with coils in 668 patients. Procedure-related rupture occurred in 7 (11.7%) of 60 aneurysms < or = 3 mm, compared with 14 (2.3%) of 622 aneurysms > 3 mm (relative risk 5.2, 95% confidence interval 2.2-12.8; p < 0.001). Among cases with procedure-related rupture, inflation of a compliant balloon was associated with better outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale Score > or = 4) compared with patients treated without balloon assistance (5 of 5 compared with 7 of 16; p = 0.05). Death resulting from procedure-related rupture occurred in 8 (38%) of 21 patients, and a vegetative state occurred in 1 patient. Clinical outcome was good in the other 12 patients (57%). CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular coil embolization of very small (< or = 3 mm) ruptured cerebral aneurysms is 5 times more likely to result in procedure-related rupture compared with larger aneurysms. Balloon inflation for hemostasis may be associated with better outcome in the event of intraprocedural rupture and merits further study.     

Stereotactic aspiration of enlarged intracerebral hematoma caused by intraprocedural perforation of aneurysm during coil embolization

BACKGROUND: Instead of surgical intervention, endovascular treatment with GDC has become an important tool to treat intracranial aneurysm in recent years. However, intraoperative aneurysm rupture remains a devastating complication for physicians. Rapid and precise packing with coils and external ventricular drainage are advised. Stereotactic aspiration of an enlarged intracerebral hematoma caused by intraprocedural perforation of aneurysm has been rarely discussed as a method of dealing with this consequence. CASE DESCRIPTION: The authors describe a case of a 45-year-old man who presented with sudden onset of headache. A ruptured aneurysm of approximately 5.5 mm, arising from the proximal segment of superior sylvian M2 branch on the right middle cerebral artery, was diagnosed via intracranial angiography. During transarterial embolization, perforation of the aneurysm dome by coil and microcatheter was noted. Although the aneurysm was secured by rapid coiling, progressive weakness of left extremities related to enlarged intracranial hematoma was noted. The neurologic deficits improved successfully after stereotactic aspiration of hematoma. CONCLUSION: The role of stereotactic aspiration in the management of an enlarged hematoma due to intraprocedural perforation of aneurysm during coil embolization may have further implications, and it may be considered as an alternative treatment to open clot evacuation for intracranial hemorrhages with aneurysms.     

颅内动脉瘤弹簧圈栓塞治疗术中动脉瘤再破裂的防治

目的颅内动脉瘤在弹簧圈栓塞过程中发生破裂是最可怕的术中并发症之一，本文探讨处理、预防这一并发症的初步经验。方法2002年4月-2006年12月，共有153例患有颅内动脉瘤的患者在我院接受了可脱卸弹簧圈栓塞治疗，其中141例患者曾有过动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血史。5例有动脉瘤破裂出血史的患者术中再次发生动脉瘤破裂。术中动脉瘤再破裂时，常规使用鱼精蛋白中和肝素，并设法用弹簧圈尽快填塞动脉瘤腔。微导丝引起动脉瘤破裂时，尽量保持微导丝不动，微导管尽快送到瘤腔中进行填塞治疗。若微导管引起破裂而微导管头端位于瘤壁外蛛网膜下腔时，微导管且勿退入瘤腔内，应将弹簧圈经微导管送入蛛网膜下腔一部分后，再将微导管头撤入瘤腔内，继续弹簧圈填塞。若弹簧圈引起破裂，要将弹簧圈完全或部分送出去，将破裂口堵住后，调整微导管头端位置继续弹簧圈填塞。结果在接受动脉瘤栓塞治疗的153例患者中，141例曾有过动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血，治疗中5例发生了术中再破裂，占动脉瘤破裂引起蛛网膜下腔出血的3．5％，总发生率为3．3％。1例破裂由导丝引起，1例由微导管引起，1例由弹簧圈过度填塞引起，弹簧圈穿孔1例，其余1例由微导管和弹簧圈共同引起。2例死亡，死亡率占术中破裂的40％，占总例数的1．3％；1例患者出院时遗留有右下肢瘫痪，其余2例患者无残留神经系统并发症。结论动脉瘤栓塞术中动脉瘤的再破裂是一少见、威胁生命但又不可避免的事件。应该立即采取妥善措施以挽救患者生命、改善预后、降低可怕并发症的发生。如处理恰当，多数术中动脉瘤破裂的患者能够存活，无后遗症。     

Rupture during the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and technical aspects

Object

The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and outcomes of intraprocedural rupture (IPR) during endovascular coil embolization of intracranial aneurysm at a single center and to explore the technical reasons and put forward corresponding preventive measures for the feared event to serve as references for other endovascular specialists.

Methods

The aneurysm database in our series was retrospectively reviewed. From April 2005 to March 2009, 176 aneurysms were consecutively treated with coils in 161 patients and IPR occurred in 12 patients. The medical records for the 12 patients were seriously examined.

Results

Of the 12 patients (6.8 %), four were men and eight were women with a median age of 56 years. An emergency “rescue clipping” of the lesion was carried out in two patients, parent artery occlusion was performed in two cases, endovascular treatment was terminated in one case and aneurysm coiling was rapidly completed in the remaining seven cases. Complete occlusion was achieved in nine aneurysms and incomplete occlusion in one. One patient died, yielding a mortality rate of 8.3 %. The follow-up duration was 6–30 months (median 14 months) and the mean Glasgow Outcome Scale score at the last follow-up examination was 4.3.

Conclusions

The rate of IPR during endovascular coiling of intracranial aneurysms is quite low and the clinical outcome from this complication need not be catastrophic if managed appropriately. Improved operation skill and practical experience exchange among neuroradiologists are essential to lower the incidence or better patient prognoses.     

Intracranial hemorrhage associated with stent-assisted coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: a cautionary report

OBJECT: The introduction of the Neuroform microstent has facilitated the embolization of complex cerebral aneurysms, which were previously not amenable to endovascular therapy. Typically, the use of this stent necessitates the administration of dual antiplatelet therapy to minimize thromboembolic complications. Such therapy may increase the risk of hemorrhage in patients who require concurrent external ventricular drainage and/or subsequent permanent cerebrospinal fluid diversion. METHODS: The authors' neurosurgical database was queried for all patients who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms and who required an external ventricular drain (EVD) or ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt placement for management of hydrocephalus. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients underwent stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms at the authors' institution over a recent 2-year period. Seven of these patients required placement of an EVD and/or a VP shunt. Three of the 7 patients suffered an immediate intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) associated with placement or manipulation of an EVD; 1 experienced a delayed intraparenchymal hemorrhage and an IVH; 1 suffered an aneurysmal rehemorrhage; and the last patient had a subdural hematoma (SDH) that resulted from placement of a VP shunt. This patient required drainage of the SDH and exchange of the valve. CONCLUSIONS: The necessity of dual antiplatelet therapy in the use of stent-assisted coil embolization increases the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and possibly rebleeding from a ruptured aneurysm. This heightened risk must be recognized when contemplating the appropriate therapy for a cerebral aneurysm and when considering the placement or manipulation of a ventricular catheter in a patient receiving dual antiplatelet therapy. Further study of intracranial procedures in patients receiving dual antiplatelet therapy is indicated.     

Clinical and anatomic outcomes after endovascular coiling of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: report on 30 treated aneurysms and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms has not been extensively studied. We report our experience on a select group of patients that underwent coil embolization of an MCA bifurcation aneurysm. METHODS: From August 1999 to January 2005, 29 patients harboring 30 MCA aneurysms were treated with coil embolization. These patients were felt to have favorable characteristics for endovascular therapy including absence of thrombus in the aneurysm, absence of an efferent artery off of the aneurysm, and ability to reconstruct the wide neck with stent reconstruction. We retrospectively reviewed their records and angiographic images to evaluate for technical result and complications. RESULTS: The mean age of our cohort was 59 +/- 13 years with 19 patients presenting with a ruptured aneurysm. Complete obliteration was achieved in 24 (80%) of 30 of aneurysms on postprocedural angiography and no patient showed aneurysm regrowth at 6-month follow-up. Twenty-seven (93%) of 29 patients had no change in baseline neurological function post-embolization. There were two procedural-related complications: one intraprocedural rupture of an aneurysm and one thromboembolic stroke in the ipsilateral MCA territory. CONCLUSIONS: Coil embolization of MCA bifurcation aneurysms has a high rate of complete obliteration with acceptable morbidity in our selected group of patients.     

Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms: incidence, complications, and angiography results

OBJECT: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, indications, complications, and angiography results associated with balloon-assisted coil embolization (BACE) of intracranial aneurysms and to compare these factors with those for conventional coil embolization (CE). METHODS: Between 1995 and 2005, 827 intracranial aneurysms in 757 consecutive patients were packed with coils. Balloon-assisted coil embolization was used in 8.6% (71 of 827) of the coil insertion procedures and was more frequently used in large aneurysms, unruptured lesions, and those located on the vertebrobasilar system and carotid artery. Procedure-related complications leading to death or dependency were significantly higher in BACEs (14.1%) compared with those in CEs (3%). Packing densities and the results of 6-month follow-up angiography studies did not differ significantly between the two types of treatments. There was a strong trend for a higher retreatment rate in the aneurysms treated with BACE. CONCLUSIONS: Balloon-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms is associated with a high complication rate and should only be used if conventional CE of these lesions is impossible or has failed and if anticipated surgical risks are too high. The BACE procedure does not improve the occlusion rates of the aneurysms on follow-up evaluation.     

WingSpan Stent System in the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: clinical experience with midterm follow-up results

OBJECT: The WingSpan stent is a new self-expandable neurovascular stent designed for endovascular treatment of intracranial atheromatous lesions. The authors report their experience with the use of this stent for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with 40 wide-necked intracranial aneurysms were treated using the WingSpan stent. Twenty-two aneurysms (55%) were small and 18 (45%) were large or giant. In all but 4 aneurysms, embolization was completed by packing the aneurysm sac with platinum coils. In 4 dissecting aneurysms that were fusiform or too small and wide necked to be catheterized, the stent was used alone. In these cases, the stent bridged the aneurysm neck to allow for flow redirection and the potential stent-induced endothelization effect. RESULTS: Follow-up angiograms obtained in 3 of 4 aneurysms, treated with only stent placement, demonstrated aneurysmal thrombosis and parent artery remodeling in 2 patients and moderate decrease in size in 1. Follow-up angiography obtained at 6 months to 1 year in 31 aneurysms after stent-supported coil embolization demonstrated complete occlusion in 23 aneurysms (74.2%) with a progressive thrombosis rate of 66.7% (10 of 15 aneurysms), and a recanalization rate of 16.1%. CONCLUSIONS: In treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, the WingSpan Stent System is very flexible, secure, and effective. Its delivery system is very easy and exact in that it exerts higher outward radial force, thus providing an excellent conformability and a strong scaffold to hold the coils in place. It may offer an effective treatment when used alone in some fusiform or very wide-necked, small dissecting aneurysms in which other surgical or endovascular treatment strategies are not deemed feasible.     

Mid-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with HydroSoft coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience

Background

HydroSoft (MicroVention, Aliso Viejo, CA), a hydrogel-platinum coil hybrid device, is one of various efforts to overcome recanalization of coiled intracranial aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the HydroSoft coils in patients with intracranial aneurysms, and to compare the 12-month outcomes with that of bare platinum coils.

Methods

Four-hundred one patients harboring 430 intracranial aneurysms underwent endovascular embolization with the HydroSoft coils. In the control group, 221 patients harboring 253 aneurysms underwent coil embolization with bare platinum coils. The authors compared the degree of occlusion of the aneurysms, packing attenuations, procedural-related complications, and 12-month follow-up results between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences of initial angiographic outcomes and procedure-related complications between the HydroSoft-coil group and the bare-coil group. Mean volumetric packing density of the HydroSoft-coil group was significantly higher than that of the bare platinum coil group (36.0?±?8.50 % versus 32.1?±?8.22 %, p?p?=?0.001, Fischer’s exact test). Multivariate Poisson regression revealed that coil embolization using the HydroSoft coil significantly reduces the retreatment rate of coiled aneurysms at 12-month follow-up (adjusted RR, 0.21; 95 % CI, 0.07-0.64; p?=?0.004).

Conclusion

Coil embolization using HydroSoft coils achieves higher volumetric packing density. Twelve-month follow-up data favors HydroSoft coils, with lower retreatment rates.     

Nonoperative management of unruptured visceral artery aneurysms: treatment by transcatheter coil embolization

PURPOSE: To describe our experiences with the treatment of visceral artery aneurysms (VAA) by transcatheter coil embolization and to propose indications for treating VAA by this method. METHODS: We treated 22 patients with VAA by coil embolization; 9 had splenic-, 7 renal-, 4 pancreaticoduodenal arcade-, and 2 proper hepatic artery aneurysms. All nine splenic artery aneurysms patients presented with chronic hepatitis-C; four had hepatocellular carcinoma. Of the seven renal artery aneurysms patients, four were hypertensive and three had rheumatoid arthritis. Both pancreaticoduodenal arcade artery aneurysms patients manifested severe stenosis of the celiac axis. Our transcatheter coil embolization procedure includes coil embolization and coil-packing of the aneurysmal sac, preserving the native arterial circulation. RESULTS: Transcatheter coil embolization with aneurysm packing was technically successful in 16 (72.7%) of the 22 patients and the native arterial circulation was preserved. Postprocedure angiograms confirmed complete disappearance of the VAA. In four of the nine splenic artery aneurysm patients, the native arterial circulation was not preserved. In one renal artery aneurysm patient, stenosis at the aneurysmal neck necessitated placement of a stent before transcatheter coil embolization. Magnetic resonance angiographs obtained during the follow-up period (mean 27 months) demonstrated complete thrombosis of the VAA in all 22 patients. Infarction occurred in one splenic- and two renal artery aneurysms patients; the latter developed flank pain and fever after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter coil embolization is an effective alternative treatment for patients with saccular and proximal VAA. In particular, the isolation technique using coil embolization is advantageous in splenic artery aneurysm patients.     

Transluminal stent-assisted coil embolization of a vertebral confluence aneurysm: technique report

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in stent technology have allowed for negotiation of often tortuous posterior circulation intracranial vasculature. Stent-assisted coil embolization is a novel treatment for complex wide-necked aneurysms, as stents provide a buttress that allows for coil deposition while preventing coil herniation into the parent vessel lumen. We describe a case of stent-assisted coil embolization of a complex wide-necked vertebral confluence aneurysm. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 61-year-old woman presented with a Hunt-Hess III, Fisher Grade III subarachnoid hemorrhage secondary to a ruptured vertebral confluence aneurysm demonstrated on angiography. The patient underwent emergent angiography and attempted coiling of a vertebral confluence aneurysm. Because of the aneurysm's complex wide neck and the presence of subclavian steal syndrome, the coils repeatedly herniated into the left vertebral and basilar artery lumina. A flexible coronary stent was deployed across the aneurysm neck, preventing coil herniation and allowing for greater coil deposition. The patient tolerated the procedure and underwent repeat coiling 2 months postoperatively because of mild coil compaction. This resulted in 100% occlusion and the patient is neurologically normal except for a sixth nerve palsy which had been present after the hemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Recent advances in stent technology allow negotiation of the tortuous posterior circulation vasculature. Stent-assisted coil embolization of complex, wide-necked vertebral confluence aneurysms may be an alternative intervention for these surgically challenging lesions.     

Management of intraprocedural arterial thrombus in cerebral aneurysm embolization with abciximab: technical case report

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE: Thromboembolic complications after cerebral aneurysm treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils (Boston Scientific/Target, Fremont, CA) are not infrequent; in a University of California, Los Angeles institutional review of 720 treated aneurysms, thromboembolic complications occurred in 2.5% of cases. The development of intraluminal thrombus during the embolization procedure, however, may be diagnosed promptly and treated effectively with appropriate therapy. This report describes the use of intravenously administered abciximab for the treatment of intraprocedural arterial thrombus encountered during the coil embolization of a recently ruptured anterior communicating artery aneurysm. CLINICAL PRESENTATION: A 45-year-old man presented with severe headache 12 days before transfer to our institution. He had no neurological deficits at admission. Previous computed tomography of the brain demonstrated subarachnoid hemorrhage, and magnetic resonance angiography from the other institution demonstrated a 4-mm anterior communicating artery aneurysm. INTERVENTION: The patient underwent Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of the aneurysm under systemic heparinization. During the embolization, however, a thrombus developed in the proximal left A2 segment. The patient was given an intravenous infusion (20 mg) of abciximab for 10 minutes, and within 15 minutes dissolution of the thrombus was observed with no angiographic evidence of distal emboli. After reversal of general anesthesia, the patient exhibited minimal right leg weakness, which resolved within 1 hour. CONCLUSION: Abciximab may be a useful adjunct for endovascular treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysms in whom intraprocedural arterial thrombus is encountered.     

Endovascular management of a ruptured cavernous carotid artery aneurysm associated with a carotid cavernous fistula with an intracranial self-expanding microstent and hydrogel-coated coil embolization: case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Ruptured CCAs are traditionally treated with endovascular management. Advances in microstent and coil technology have allowed improved intracranial navigation, increased coil packing density, and coil volume expansion to facilitate complete coil embolization of aneurysms/fistulae. We report a case of a ruptured CCA with an associated CCF treated with an intracranial, self-expanding microstent in combination with coil embolization using hydrogel-coated platinum coils. CASE DESCRIPTION: A 50-year-old woman presented with a 7-day history of severe headache and 2 days of progressive left-sided ptosis, ophthalmoplegia, and facial dysesthesias. A cerebral angiogram demonstrated a left ruptured wide-necked CCA with an associated CCF. An intracranial, self-expanding microstent (Neuroform(3), Boston Scientific, Natick, MA) was placed across the aneurysmal neck. The aneurysm was subsequently embolized with hydrogel-coated platinum coils (HydroCoil). A 3-month follow-up angiogram showed complete resolution of arteriovenous shunting with near-complete occlusion of the CCA. The patient's ocular pain and facial dysesthesias resolved completely, with near-complete resolution of ophthalmoplegia. CONCLUSIONS: This case demonstrates near-complete occlusion of a ruptured CCA and obliteration of an associated CCF using endovascular combinational therapy of an intracranial, self-expanding microstent with hydrogel-coated platinum coils. Use of this newer-generation stent-coil combination may allow more complete and durable lesion occlusion because of increased coil packing density and coil volume expansion without the need for parent artery sacrifice or balloon-remodeling techniques, thus avoiding the potential complications of such therapies.     

Pipeline flow diversion with adjunctive coil embolization for internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component: results in 46 consecutive aneurysms from a Japanese single-center experience

In the treatment of an intracranial aneurysm with the flow diverter, the combined use of coil embolization can help promote subsequent progressive thrombosis within the aneurysm sac and reduce the risk of delayed aneurysm rupture. This study retrospectively reviewed outcomes of patients who had undergone the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) with adjunctive coil embolization (PED/coil) at a single center to determine its safety and efficiency. Patients with internal carotid artery aneurysms following an intradural component were selected for PED/coil between 2015 and 2020. All patients were premedicated with dual antiplatelet therapy of aspirin plus clopidogrel or prasugrel. A minimal number of PEDs were deployed, with coils inserted using a stent-jail technique, avoiding dense packing. A total of 46 aneurysms (43 patients; median dome size, 11.6 mm; median neck width, 6.3 mm) were treated with PED/coil. The median volume embolization ratio was 14.8%. The degree of angiographic filling at the 6-month and latest angiography showed complete occlusion in 60.5% (26/43) and 70.5% (31/44), respectively. Small (<?10 mm) aneurysms achieved a higher complete occlusion rate in the early period; a lower cumulative incidence of aneurysm occlusion was observed in large and giant (≥?10 mm) aneurysms (P?=?.024). The median clinical follow-up was 22 months, and no aneurysm ruptures occurred. Favorable clinical outcomes were achieved, with permanent neurological morbidity of 4.7% and no mortality. PED/coil demonstrated a high angiographic occlusion rate at an early stage. Loosely packed coils are sufficient to obliterate aneurysms effectively.

     

Immediate and midterm follow-up results of using an electrodetachable, fully retrievable SOLO stent system in the endovascular coil occlusion of wide-necked cerebral aneurysms

OBJECT: Stent-assisted embolization is an alternative endovascular treatment method for wide-necked intracranial aneurysms. Currently available stents have the limitations of poor radial force, difficult delivery systems, and lack of full retrievability. The authors report on their preliminary experience with the use of a new, fully retrievable, self-expanding neurovascular stent, which has a high radial force and easy delivery system, combined with coil or Onyx embolization for the treatment of wide-necked aneurysms, including 6-month follow-up data. METHODS: Fifteen patients with 18 wide-necked intracranial aneurysms were treated using the SOLO stent system and detachable platinum coils. Aneurysms were located at the posterior communicating artery (seven lesions), midbasilar artery (one lesion), internal carotid artery (ICA) bifurcation (one lesion), ICA-ophthalmic artery segment (eight lesions), and posterior cerebral artery (one lesion). Eleven aneurysms were small, six were large, and one was giant. Only one of these aneurysms was in the acute stage of subarachnoid hemorrhage; balloon remodeling alone failed to keep the coils in the aneurysm sac. RESULTS: Only one stent required retrieving and repositioning after it had been fully deployed, and retrieval was easy and successful. No thromboembolic complication, dissection/rupture, or vasospasm occured during stent placement. Follow-up angiograms obtained at 6 months posttreatment in the 18 aneurysms demonstrated that all stents were patent with no evidence of intimal hyperplasia or stenosis. In all cases but one, 100% lesion occlusion was observed at the 6-month control angiography examination. Only one aneurysm had recanalized. CONCLUSIONS: The fully retrievable self-expandible SOLO stent is a feasible, secure, and effective system with a high radial force and ease of delivery in treating wide-necked intracranial aneurysms in combination with coil embolization.     

Surgically treated aneurysms previously coiled: lessons learned

OBJECTIVE: Intravascular coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms has proved to be a safe and effective treatment in certain patient groups; however, this treatment is relatively new, and the long-term outcomes are unknown. One of the known complications is refilling of the aneurysm dome, which is seen in follow-up studies. This patient population poses unique technical difficulties for the neurosurgeon. We present a series of 18 patients who underwent surgery for residual aneurysms after coil remobilization. METHODS: During a 5-year period, we performed surgery in 18 patients who had previously undergone coil embolization for their aneurysms. Of these aneurysms, four were in the anterior communicating artery, five were in the posterior communicating artery, three were in the internal carotid artery, three were in the posteroinferior cerebellar artery, and three were in the middle cerebral artery. One patient presented with rupture, one presented with acute IIIrd cranial nerve palsy, and the rest of the aneurysms were found on routine follow-up angiograms. Fifteen aneurysms were clipped, and in three patients, they were wrapped because the clip could not be placed adequately. RESULTS: There were no major complications in any of the patients, and all had uneventful recoveries. The presence of coils in the aneurysm dome and/or neck made clipping and exposure of the aneurysm neck difficult, resulting in incomplete neck obliteration in three patients. CONCLUSION: Operative clipping after previous coil embolization in aneurysms poses a unique problem for neurosurgeons. With the increasing use of coil embolization, this patient population will undoubtedly increase. The neurosurgeon should be aware of the difficulties and pitfalls encountered in these patients.