Ganirelix acetate causes a rapid reduction in estradiol levels without adversely affecting oocyte maturation in women pretreated with leuprolide acetate who are at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: Elevated estradiol (E(2)) levels predispose to development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since GnRH antagonist is associated with a reduction in E(2) levels, we hypothesized that GnRH-antagonist treatment of women down-regulated with GnRH agonist who are at risk of OHSS might reduce E(2) levels and avoid cycle cancellation. METHODS: Retrospective study in a university-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) programme in 87 patients treated with long luteal (LL) or microdose flare (MDF) with ovarian hyperresponse and 87 control patients without ovarian hyperresponse. GnRH-antagonist (ganirelix acetate) treatment was started and leuprolide acetate discontinued in women who failed to respond to a reduction in gonadotrophin dosage. RESULTS: In the treatment group, there was a significant, reproducible reduction in serum E(2) levels. Mean E(2) at the start of ganirelix treatment was 4219.8 pg/ml and decreased in 24 h to 2613.7 pg/ml (36.7%; P < 0.001). An average of 24.9 +/- 8.8 oocytes were obtained at retrieval and an average of 19.1 +/- 8.0 were metaphase II (79.2%). Fertilization occurred in 13.9 +/- 8.1 embryos (72.8%). In this high risk group, two cases of severe OHSS (2.3%) occurred. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 51.8%. Compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, 2PN rate, fertilization, cancellation, OHSS or pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: GnRH-antagonist treatment of women pretreated with GnRH agonist rapidly reduced circulating serum E(2) without adversely affecting oocyte maturation, fertilization rates or embryo quality and resulted in a high pregnancy rate in this subgroup of patients at risk of OHSS.     

A lower ongoing pregnancy rate can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing IVF with GnRH antagonists

BACKGROUND: Eliciting an endogenous LH surge by GnRH-agonist for the induction of final oocyte maturation may be more physiological compared with the administration of HCG. However, the efficacy of this intervention in patients treated for IVF with GnRH antagonists remains to be assessed. METHODS: 106 patients were randomized to receive either 10 000 IU urinary HCG or 0.2 mg Triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Ovarian stimulation for IVF was performed with a fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonist was started on stimulation day 6. Luteal phase was supported with micronized vaginal progesterone and oral estradiol. The study was monitored continuously for safety and stopping rules were established. RESULTS: No significant differences were present in the number of cumulus-oocyte complexes retrieved, in the proportion of metaphase II oocytes, in fertilization rates or in the number and quality of the embryos transferred between the two groups. However, a significantly lower probability of ongoing pregnancy in the GnRH agonist arm prompted discontinuation of the trial, according to the stopping rules established (odds ratio 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.02-0.52). CONCLUSIONS: Lower probability of ongoing pregnancy can be expected when GnRH agonist is used for triggering final oocyte maturation instead of HCG in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF with GnRH antagonists.     

Use of a single bolus of GnRH agonist triptorelin to trigger ovulation after GnRH antagonist ganirelix treatment in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction, with special reference to the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: preliminary report: short communication

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.     

GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation in the GnRH antagonist ovarian hyperstimulation protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Triggering final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist during ovarian stimulation is feasible when inhibition of premature LH surge is performed with GnRH antagonists, and we aimed to systematically collate evidence on the clinical efficacy of GnRH agonist triggering in patients undergoing assisted reproduction in GnRH antagonist protocols. Twenty-three publications were identified by a comprehensive literature search that included PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Three publications out of 23 fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis, which were (i) prospective, randomized controlled study design; (ii) stimulation with gonadotropins for induction of multifollicular development; (iii) suppression of endogenous LH by a GnRH antagonist; (iv) triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist; (v) control group randomized to receive HCG for final oocyte maturation and (vi) any means of luteal phase support other than HCG. The participants were normoovulatory women undergoing IVF. The outcomes assessed were clinical pregnancy per randomized patient; number of oocytes retrieved; proportion of metaphase II oocytes; fertilization rate; embryo quality score; first trimester abortion rate; ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) incidence. Results are presented as combined standardized differences of the mean and combined odds ratios, as appropriate, with 95% confidence intervals. No significant difference was found for the number of oocytes retrieved (-0.94, -0.33-0.14), proportion of metaphase II oocytes (-0.03, -0.58-0.52), fertilization rate (0.15, -0.09-0.38) or embryo quality score (0.05, -0.18-0.29). No OHSS occurred in two of the studies, whereas in one study OHSS incidence was not reported. Thus from the available data, no conclusion can be drawn as regards OHSS incidence after GnRH agonist triggering. In comparison to HCG, GnRH agonist administration is associated with a significantly reduced likelihood of achieving a clinical pregnancy (0.21, 0.05-0.84; P = 0.03). The odds of first trimester pregnancy loss is increased after GnRH agonist triggering; however, the confidence interval crosses unity (11.51, 0.95-138.98; P = 0.05). In conclusion, the use of GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in IVF, where inhibition of premature LH surge is achieved with GnRH antagonists, yields a number of oocytes capable to undergo fertilization and subsequent embryonic cleavage, which is comparable to that achieved with HCG. However, the likelihood of an ongoing clinical pregnancy after GnRH agonist triggering is significantly lower as compared to standard HCG treatment.     

Comparison between a GnRH antagonist and a GnRH agonist flare-up protocol in oocyte donors: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Little information is available on the outcome of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) using GnRH antagonist in oocyte donation cycles especially in comparison with the short GnRH agonist protocol. This study was aimed at comparing the two stimulation protocols in oocyte donation (OD) cycles. METHODS: A total of 113 donors randomly received COH using either GnRH antagonist or GnRH agonist. The primary endpoint was the mean number of mature oocytes retrieved per started donor cycle. Secondary endpoints were the mean number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes (COCs) retrieved, the mean proportion of mature oocytes, pregnancy and implantation rates in recipients. RESULTS: Oocytes were distributed to 166 recipients. The mean number (+/- SD) of COC (11.6 +/- 5.8 versus 12.1 +/- 6.7), mature oocytes (8.4 +/- 4.4 versus 8.9 +/- 5.3) and the proportion of mature oocytes (70.8 versus 75.7%) retrieved per started donor cycle were similar in the antagonist and agonist groups, respectively. The implantation rate (26.1 versus 30.1%), clinical (40.2 versus 45.6%) and ongoing pregnancy rate per recipient cycle (32.2 versus 37.9%) were comparable in antagonist and agonist protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Similar mean number of mature oocytes and comparable pregnancy rates are achieved after OD in which donors received COH using GnRH antagonist or short GnRH agonist protocols.     

Serum inhibin A, VEGF and TNFalpha levels after triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in women with polycystic ovaries undergoing IVF treatment: a prospective randomized trial

BACKGROUND: We aimed to examine the serum levels of inhibin A, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), estradiol (E2) and progesterone levels after triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist compared with HCG in patients with polycystic ovaries (PCO) and to investigate the relationship between these markers and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with PCO, undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with FSH and GnRH antagonist for IVF-embryo transfer treatment, were randomized for triggering of final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRH agonist group, n = 15) or HCG (HCG group, n = 13). Blood samples were obtained on the day of randomization and thereafter every 2-7 days. Serum levels of inhibin A, VEGF, TNFalpha, E2 and progesterone, the incidence of OHSS, ovarian size and pelvic fluid accumulation were evaluated. RESULTS: Serum inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels were significantly lower in the GnRH agonist group compared with the HCG group, particularly on the day of embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). Serum VEGF and TNFalpha levels were similar between the two groups. Four patients in the HCG group developed severe OHSS, whereas no patient had any symptoms or signs of OHSS in the GnRH-agonist group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with PCO treated with FSH/GnRH antagonist, final oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist instead of HCG reduces significantly inhibin A, E2 and progesterone levels during the luteal phase. This phenomenon reflects the inhibition of the corpus luteum function and may explain, at least in part, the mechanism of OHSS prevention in high-risk patients. Our results do not support a crucial role for VEGF or TNFalpha in OHSS.     

Comparison of GnRH agonists and antagonists in assisted reproduction cycles of patients at high risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome

BACKGROUND: During IVF or ICSI cycles, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a major problem. The aim of this prospective, multicentre, comparative study (using historical controls) was to assess the efficacy of a GnRH antagonist protocol in preventing OHSS in selected patients who had experienced OHSS or had been at risk of OHSS in their previous IVF/ICSI attempt. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent a new cycle where the same gonadotrophin protocol was used [same dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH)] but a different protocol was used for pituitary desensitization: cetrorelix 0.25 mg multiple-dose antagonist instead of GnRH agonist long protocol. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg was administered daily, starting when the leading follicle reached a diameter of 14 mm. In other words, rFSH was administered in the new cycle according to the dosage and the step-up or step-down modalities used during the previous cycle, independently of ultrasound findings and serum estradiol (E(2)) levels. Eighty-seven patients entered the study. Out of the 87 cycles involving GnRH agonists, 49 (56.3%) were cancelled and out of the 87 involving GnRH antagonists 28 (32.2%) were cancelled [McNemar's test; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.8% to -11.2%; P < 0.001]. After GnRH agonist cycles, we recorded 24 cases of OHSS (18 moderate and six severe; 27.6%), whereas after the GnRH antagonist cycles there were 10 cases of OHSS (nine moderate and one severe; 11.5%) (95% CI-26.4% to -5.7%; P = 0.006). There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of follicles with a diameter >10 mm (Wilcoxon's test; Z = 6.1; P < 0.001) and of E(2) levels on the day of HCG administration (2538 versus 4322.4 pg/ml; P < 0.001) in the GnRH antagonist cycles versus GnRH agonist cycles. Twenty-nine patients had an embryo transfer in the first cycle (76.3% of oocyte retrievals) and 57 in the cycle using GnRH antagonist (96.6%). This 20.3% difference was also significant (Z-test; 95% CI 6.8-36.0%; P = 0.003). After the antagonist cycles, 18 pregnancies (20.7 per initiated cycle; 31.6% per embryo transfer) were obtained. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study presents some limitations owing to the use of historical controls, our data show a favourable effect of GnRH antagonists in reducing the incidence of OHSS and the number of assisted fertilization cycles cancelled because of the risk of OHSS in high responder patients. As a consequence, GnRH antagonist plus gonadotrophin administration could also increase the percentage of oocyte retrievals and embryo transfers in this high risk group of patients.     

Will GnRH antagonists provide new hope for patients considered 'difficult responders' to GnRH agonist protocols?

We have assessed the use of cetrorelix, a gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist, in conjunction with clomiphene citrate and gonadotrophin in 31 in-vitro fertilization (IVF)/gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) cycles for 25 difficult responders. Group I included 18 poor responders (24 cycles) with no live birth in 23 previous IVF cycles with GnRH agonists. Group II included seven patients (seven cycles) with polycystic ovaries. Thirteen previous IVF/GIFT cycles with GnRH agonists had resulted in one live birth and three of these patients had developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The treatment protocol involved a daily dose of clomiphene citrate 100 mg for 5 days and gonadotrophin injections from cycle day 2. Cetrorelix 0.25 mg/day was started when the leading follicle reached 14 mm. The outcome in both groups was favourable compared to previous treatment with GnRH agonists. In group I the abandoned cycle rate was 29 versus 57% (P = 0.06). More oocytes were produced (6.4 versus 4.7 oocytes/cycle) at a lower dose of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) (709 versus 1163 IU/oocyte; P = 0.08) and two live births resulted (11.8%). In group II fewer oocytes were produced (10.2 versus 14.5 oocytes/cycle), using a lower dose of gonadotrophin (170 versus 189 IU/oocyte) and resulted in one ongoing pregnancy. No patients experienced OHSS. This report is preliminary and a further controlled randomized study is required.     

Management of failed cycles in an IVF/GIFT programme with the combination of GnRH analogue and HMG

The addition of the gonadotrophin rrleasing hormone (GnRH) agonistBuserelin to human menopausal gonadotrophin/human chorioaicgonadotrophin (HMG/MCG) during ovarian stimulation was evaluatedin 23 cycles of 21 women who previously had unsuccessful IVFtreatments when stimulated with clomiphene-HMG/HCG. No adverseeffects of GnRH-agonist on folliculogenesis were seen. A meannumber of 7.2 oocytes per retrieval was collected in 20 treatmentcycles. Oocytes quality, fertilization and cleavage parameterswere normal. Replacements by gamete intra-Fallopian transfer(GIFT) or IVF took place for 16 patients. Four patients becamepregnant in their treatment cycle, one aborted. For 8 patients18 embryos were cryopreserved, one transfer of a frozen-thawedembryo in a subsequent natural cycle led to a pregnancy. Inadequateluteal phases were constantly observed when supplementationwas omitted. Further study is required to confirm that systematicluteal support improves the pregnancy rate.     

Timing luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/embryo transfer cycles

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the effect of three different times of onset of luteal phase support on ongoing pregnancy rate in infertile patients undergoing treatment with GnRH down-regulated IVF and embryo transfer (IVF/ET). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All consecutive eligible patients planned to undergo their first IVF treatment cycle were randomly allocated to receive vaginal progesterone as luteal support at three different time points, that is, after HCG administration for final oocyte maturation (HCG group), at the day of oocyte retrieval (OR group) or at the day of ET (ET group). The primary endpoint of this study was ongoing pregnancy rate. RESULTS: A total of 385 women were randomized, 130 were allocated to the HCG group, 128 to the OR group and 127 to the ET group. An ongoing pregnancy rate of 20.8% was found in the HCG group versus 22.7 and 23.6% in the OR group and ET group, respectively. The mean number and quality of the retrieved oocytes and the transferred embryos did not differ. CONCLUSION: Based on this data, an 18% difference in ongoing pregnancy rate between the three different times of onset of luteal phase support in GnRH agonist down-regulated IVF/ET cycles can be refuted. Smaller clinically meaningful differences may be present.     

GnRH antagonists followed by a decline in serum estradiol results in adverse outcomes in donor oocyte cycles

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess clinical outcomes using GnRH antagonists in oocyte donation cycles. METHODS: Between July 2000 and June 2001, 40 recipient cycles generated from donor oocytes were evaluated. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) was started on cycle day 2 using recombinant gonadotrophins (225 IU daily). GnRH antagonist was started on cycle day 6 of COH. All recipients were synchronized to donors using GnRH agonist followed by estrogen and progesterone supplementation. Main outcome measures were days of stimulation (DOS), number of ampoules used, peak serum estradiol, number of oocytes, fertilization rate, embryo score, clinical on-going pregnancy rate and implantation rate. RESULTS: Thirty-seven donor cycles (93%) underwent oocyte retrieval, resulting in 36 embryo transfers. Fourteen cycles (35%) had decreased serum estradiol after initiation of GnRH antagonist. No differences were seen in numbers of FSH ampoules, DOS, peak serum estradiol, number of retrieved oocytes, fertilization rate and embryo quality. However, clinical pregnancy rate per initiated cycle [14% (2/14) versus 54% (14/26)], ongoing pregnancy rate per initiated cycle [7% (1/14) versus 46% (12/26)] and implantation rate (4 versus 24%) were all significantly less (P <0.05) following a decrease in serum estradiol after initiation of GnRH antagonist. No clinical predictor, including donor age, basal day 2 FSH or estradiol, ovarian morphology or serum estradiol prior to GnRH antagonist, was predictive of a decline in serum estradiol following GnRH antagonist. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate an adverse effect on clinical outcome in cycles, resulting in a decline in serum estradiol after GnRH antagonist administration. This effect was unpredictable and provided a simplified protocol for oocyte donation cycles; nonetheless, further study is needed to clarify the adverse effects of GnRH antagonists in oocyte donation cycles.     

GnRH agonist protocol administration in the luteal phase in ICSI-ET cycles stimulated with the long GnRH agonist protocol: a randomized, controlled double blind study

BACKGROUND: GnRH agonist administration in the luteal phase was reported to beneficially affect the clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo transfer (ET) cycles. This double blind, randomized, placebo controlled trial evaluates whether a single dose GnRH agonist administered 6 days after ICSI increases ongoing pregnancy rates following ET in cycles stimulated with the long GnRH agonist protocol. METHODS: Five hundred and seventy women undergoing ET following controlled ovarian stimulation with a long GnRH agonist protocol were included. In addition to routine luteal phase support with progesterone, women were randomized to receive a single 0.1 mg dose of triptorelin or placebo 6 days after ICSI. Randomization was done on the day of ET according to a computer generated randomization table. Ongoing pregnancy rate beyond 20th week of gestation was the primary outcome measure. The trial was powered to detect a 12% absolute increase from an assumed 38% ongoing pregnancy rate in the placebo group, with an alpha error level of 0.05 and a beta error level of 0.2. RESULTS: There were 89 (31.2%) ongoing pregnancies in the GnRH agonist group, and 84 (29.5%) in the control group (absolute difference +1.7%, 95% confidence interval -5.8% to +9.2%). Implantation, clinical pregnancy and multiple pregnancy rates were likewise similar in the GnRH agonist and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Single 0.1 mg triptorelin administration 6 days after ICSI following ovarian stimulation with the long GnRH agonist protocol does not seem to result in an increase >or=12% in ongoing pregnancy rates.     

Continuation of GnRH agonist administration for 1 week,after hCG injection,prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos

BACKGROUND: An approach consisting of elective cryopreservation of all embryos has been proposed for patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Although elective cryopreservation can prevent pregnancy-induced late OHSS, it cannot prevent early OHSS. Early OHSS is reported to have been complicated with thromboembolism. The study was carried out to assess the efficacy with which the continued administration of GnRH agonist for 1 week after 5000 IU of hCG injection could prevent early OHSS. METHODS: This study employed an open controlled clinical trial at three centres for treatment of infertility in Sapporo. A total of 138 patients at risk of OHSS during IVF-embryo transfer from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 1999, were assigned in turn either to a group with elective cryopreservation of all pronucleate embryos (n = 68) or to one with continuation of GnRH agonist administration for 1 week after hCG injection following elective cryopreservation (n = 70). Subsequently, they were transferred in hormone replacement cycles. The development of severe OHSS (ascites, haemoconcentration) was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 10% of patients developed severe OHSS necessitating hospitalization because of a marked increase in ascites in the upper abdomen and the haemoconcentration in the elective cryopreservation alone group. On the other hand, none developed severe OHSS in the GnRH agonist continuation group. CONCLUSIONS: In our study, continuation of GnRH agonist for 1 week after hCG injection prevented severe early OHSS following elective cryopreservation of all embryos. This treatment is safe and cost-beneficial, and should be performed promptly for patients at risk of OHSS.     

Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists: GnRH antagonists do not activate the GnRH receptor

Recent suggestions that gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists activate the GnRH receptor are discussed. Most of the studies cited in support of this suggestion are in-vitro studies, testing supra-pharmacological doses of GnRH analogues in cancer cell lines, whereas GnRH antagonists, e.g. ganirelix or cetrorelix, do not affect the steroidogenesis of human granulosa cells in vitro. In patients treated with GnRH antagonists prior to IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), oocyte maturity and fertilization rates are equal to those achieved following a long protocol of GnRH agonists. Although there is a tendency towards a lower pregnancy rate (not statistically significant) in the initial trials using GnRH antagonist with either recombinant FSH or human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) for ovarian stimulation, this new treatment option of GnRH antagonists facilitates short and simple treatment and improves the convenience and safety for the patient. As with GnRH agonists in the past, the clinical outcome of GnRH antagonist treatment will improve with time as more clinical experience is gained (learning curve) and the treatment protocol is optimized. Moreover, a GnRH agonist instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) may be used for triggering ovulation and will decrease the cancellation rate and minimize the risk for developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).     

Effect of oral contraceptive pill pretreatment on ongoing pregnancy rates in patients stimulated with GnRH antagonists and recombinant FSH for IVF. A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess the effect of oral contraceptive pill (OCP) pretreatment on the probability of ongoing pregnancy in patients treated with a GnRH antagonist for IVF. METHODS: A fixed dose of 200 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) was started in 425 patients either on day 2 of the menstrual cycle (non-OCP group: n = 211) or 5 days after discontinuing the OCP (OCP group: n = 214). GnRH-antagonist was initiated on day 6 of stimulation, and triggering of final oocyte maturation was performed with 10,000 IU of HCG. RESULTS: Ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle in the non-OCP and OCP group were 27.5% and 22.9%, respectively [95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference: -3.7 to +12.8]. Pregnancy loss was significantly increased in the OCP (36.4%) compared with the non-OCP group (21.6%) (95% CI of the difference: -28.4 to -2.3). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with OCP, as compared with initiation of stimulation on day 2 of the cycle in patients treated with GnRH antagonist and recombinant FSH, appears to be associated with a not significant difference in ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle and results in a significantly higher early pregnancy loss.     

Severe OHSS: yes, there is a strategy to prevent it!

Effective measures to prevent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remain controversial. It became almost 'common knowledge' that there is no strategy that may completely prevent OHSS. Extensive clinical experience (albeit not derived from prospective randomized studies) clearly documents the ability of a single administration of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist to effectively trigger ovulation, while completely eliminating any threat of clinically significant OHSS. This strategy cannot be used if the pituitary is down-regulated (as is the case in most assisted reproductive cycles today), however, the newly-introduced GnRH antagonists open new opportunities for implementing this strategy, since the pituitary preserves its responsiveness to GnRH agonists. Combining GnRH antagonist-based ovarian stimulation (particularly in 'high responders'), with GnRH agonist-driven ovulation triggering will make severe OHSS a disease of the past in assisted reproduction.     

In-vitro fertilization in infertile women with the polycystic ovarian syndrome

Forty-four infertile patients with the polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) resistant to other treatment modalities were treated in 58 cycles of IVF after accomplishment of pituitary gonadotroph suppression with a GnRH-agonist. Four cycles were cancelled before oocyte retrieval while embryo transfer was deferred for 10 cycles due to imminent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Follicle aspiration yielded 18.8 +/- 9 oocytes per cycle. The cleavage rate was 68%. There was no cleavage in five cycles. The pregnancy rate was 33.3% per embryo transfer. In 32 cycles 9.0 +/- 5 suitable supernumerary embryos were cryopreserved. Transfer of cryopreserved embryos gave three additional pregnancies. The accumulated pregnancy rate per patient was 36%. In clomiphene citrate resistant patients, transfer of cryopreserved embryos was accomplished after secretory transformation of the endometrium by oestradiol/progesterone substitution. Although seven pregnancies ended in a miscarriage, the 'take-home' baby rate was 20%. OHSS ensued in 28 (46.7%) cycles. In PCOS, in-vitro fertilization following pituitary gonadotroph suppression seems a treatment alternative with pregnancy rates comparable to normo-ovulatory women with tubal factor infertility. However, the incidence of OHSS is high and constitutes the major problem of cycle control.     

Does laparoscopic ovarian diathermy affect the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome? A retrospective comparative study

Controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF and embryo transfer and outcome parameters were compared retrospectively in 31 women with clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS). Of these women, 15 had previously undergone laparoscopic ovarian diathermy before IVF (group A, total 22 cycles) and 16 had not had surgical treatment (group B, total 24 cycles). No statistically significant differences were observed in the number of oocytes retrieved, although the number of embryos available for transfer was significantly higher in group B (7.1 +/- 3.8 versus 4.6 +/- 2.7, P < 0.01). The clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer appeared to be higher in group B (63.2 versus 41.2%), as did the miscarriage rate (66.7 versus 28.6%), giving an apparent improved ongoing pregnancy rate per embryo transfer in group A (29.4 versus 10.5%), but this was not statistically significantly different. The incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was apparently higher in group B (4.2 versus 0%), but this difference was not statistically significant. No cases of severe OHSS were seen in group A. Ovarian diathermy does not appear to have a deleterious effect on controlled ovarian stimulation, and the outcome of IVF-embryo transfer may be beneficial in decreasing the risk of severe OHSS and improving the ongoing clinical pregnancy rate.     

Timed oocyte collection in an assisted conception programme using GnRH analogue

Three-hundred-and-twenty-five patients on an assisted conception programme underwent 378 cycles of oocyte retrieval (OPU) following ovarian stimulation using a GnRH analogue and human menopausal gonadotrophins (HMG), a regimen which allows programmed cycles and delayed oocyte retrieval. Eighteen cycles were excluded (failed OPU in three and failure of fertilization in 15). In 360 cycles, patients completed their treatment with either in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) (116) or gamete intra-Fallopian transfer (GIFT) (244), of which 241 took place at the normal time and 119 were delayed for 24 h or more to avoid weekend operating. The overall pregnancy rate per OPU was 29.5%, with the IVF group being 24.1% and the GIFT group being 32.8%. In the group of patients in whom OPU was delayed, the pregnancy rate was significantly higher in each sub-group than in the corresponding non-delayed sub-group (overall, 37.0 versus 25.7%; IVF/ET, 38.5 versus 16.9%; GIFT, 36.3 versus 31.1%). There was a significantly higher number of oocytes collected, gametes/embryos transferred in the group whose OPU had been delayed. In patients receiving GnRH analogue and HMG for ovarian stimulation, delaying oocyte retrieval is not harmful, may result in an improved outcome and allows OPU to be performed on routine operating lists. This facility, together with the improved pregnancy rates associated with this protocol of ovarian stimulation should improve the cost-effectiveness of assisted conception programmes.     

Early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: early pregnancy outcome and profile

BACKGROUND: Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in IVF/ICSI cycles may occur either as an early (early onset) or a late pattern (late onset). This observational study was designed to identify whether the onset pattern of OHSS is associated with the occurrence of pregnancy and the early pregnancy outcome. METHODS: Among 4376 consecutive IVF/ICSI cycles, 113 patients were hospitalized for OHSS after IVF/ICSI treatment and were included in the study. The setting was the Dutch-speaking Brussels Free University Hospital, between June 2000 and September 2002. RESULTS: Early OHSS occurred in 53 patients, and late OHSS complicated 60 patients. A total of 96.7% of the late OHSS cases occurred in a pregnancy cycle and were more likely to be severe than the early cases (P < 0.05). Although in the early group there initially was a 41.5% positive HCG rate per cycle, the clinical pregnancy rate fell to 28.3% as a result of a significantly (P < 0.05) increased preclinical pregnancy loss rate compared with the non-OHSS patients (31.8 versus 88.3%, respectively). The ongoing pregnancy rate per cycle was 14.4% in the early and 26.4% in the late group. Multiple pregnancy rates were high in both groups (40 and 45.5%, respectively), but only in the late group did the incidence reach significance compared with the non-OHSS population (45.5 versus 29.1%, P = 0.02). Estradiol levels and number of follicles on the day of HCG were significantly higher in the early OHSS group. However, there was no difference in estradiol values on the day of hospital admittance between the two groups. In addition, the number of follicles on the day of HCG administration appears to be a better prognostic indicator for the occurrence of severe OHSS than the estradiol values (87% of the severe cases had > or = 14 or follicles of a diameter > or = 11 mm, whereas only 50% of them had an estradiol value > or = 3000 ng/l). CONCLUSIONS: The early OHSS pattern is associated with exogenously administered HCG and a higher risk of preclinical miscarriage, whereas late OHSS may be closely associated with the conception cycles, especially multiple pregnancies, and is more likely to be severe. Further clarification of these two different clinical entities could have implications for research protocols as well as for preventive and management strategies for OHSS.