腹腔灌注顺铂射频热疗联合EF方案治疗晚期胃癌临床观察

目的：观察腹腔灌注顺铂(DDP)射频热疗联合静脉注射表阿霉素(EPI)、5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及安全性。方法：共入组晚期胃癌56例，其中管状腺癌5例，低分化腺癌26例，黏液腺癌16例，印戒细胞癌9例，治疗方案为DDP40mg／m^2加入44℃生理盐水1500～2000mL中，行腹腔灌注。然后腹腔射频热疗1．5h，温度42℃～43℃，d1、d8；EPI50mg／m^2，静脉冲入，d1；5-FU500mg／m^2，静脉滴入6～8h，d1～d5。21d为1个周期，至少应用4～6个周期。结果：可评价疗效51例中，CR4例，PR25例，SD16例，PD6例，总有效率为56．9％(29／51)，中位肿瘤进展时间5．3个月，中位生存期12．4个月，主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、恶心、呕吐。结论：腹腔灌注DDP射频热疗联合静脉注射EPI、5-FU治疗晚期胃癌疗效较好，毒性可耐受。     

静脉化疗联合腹腔灌注化疗治疗晚期胃癌29例

 【摘要】　目的　观察多西紫杉醇联合5-氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）静脉化疗及顺铂（DDP）腹腔灌注化疗配合射频热疗治疗晚期胃癌的疗效及患者不良反应。方法　多西紫杉醇75 mg／m2,第1天;亚叶酸钙200 mg／m2,第1天至第5天;5-Fu 500 mg／m2,持续静脉滴注,第1天至第5天;DDP 75 mg／m2腹腔灌注化疗,第2天;21 d为1个周期,化疗期间所有患者均用射频肿瘤热疗机行腹部热疗,每周2次,每次1 h,腹腔灌注化疗后1 h开始热疗。所有患者均完成2～6个周期治疗,化疗2个周期后评价疗效。结果　29例患者中部分缓解17例,稳定9例,进展3例,总有效率为58.6 %（17／29）。剂量限制性毒性主要表现为骨髓抑制。结论　多西紫杉醇联合5-Fu静脉化疗及DDP腹腔灌注化疗配合射频热疗组成的双途径化疗方案治疗晚期胃癌近期疗效较好,不良反应可耐受。     

双路化疗治疗胃癌术后复发转移36例

对 72例胃癌术后复发转移患者进行随机分组对照研究。治疗组 36例行常规腹腔穿刺 ,有腹水者尽量放尽腹水 ,给生理盐水 10 0 0mL加 5 FU 15 0 0mg/m2 ,DDP 5 0～ 10 0mg/m2 腹腔灌注 ,HCPT 10mg/m2 ,静脉滴入 ,d1～d5;对照组36例给DDP 40mg/m2 ,d1～d3 ,5 FU 5 0 0mg/m2 ,HCPT 10mg/m2 ,d1～d5,静脉滴入。研究结果提示 ,腹腔静脉双路化疗是治疗胃癌术后复发转移的一种有效方法。     

局部射频透热联合化疗治疗晚期消化道恶性肿瘤

目的 :观察局部射频透热联合化疗治疗晚期消化道恶性肿瘤的临床疗效及其副反应。方法 :82例晚期消化道恶性肿瘤被随机分为单纯化疗组及射频透热化疗组各 4 1例。单纯化疗组全身采用以 5 Fu 35 0mg/m2 /d ,持续 8～ 2 4小时 ,连用 2 8天 ,DDP 3 5～ 7 5mg/m2 /d ,每周用 4天 ,连用 4周 ,原发性 (或转移性 )肝癌、胰腺癌、腹腔较大肿块的行区域性动脉置管 ,用动脉泵给予 5 FU。射频热化疗组采用 :西咪替丁 2 0 0mg ,地塞米松 10mg ,利多卡因 10mg ,顺铂 2 0mg加入 5 0℃生理盐水 2 0 0 0～ 2 5 0 0ml行腹腔灌注 ,于灌注后 30分钟内进行射频热疗 6 0～ 90分钟 ,每周 1次 ,热疗次数为 8～ 10次。射频透热化疗组全身化疗方法同单纯化疗组 (5 Fu 35 0mg/m2 /d ,持续 8～ 2 4小时 ,连用 2 8天 ,DDP 3 5～ 7 5mg/m2 /d ,每周用 4天 ,连用4周 ,原发性或转移性肝癌、胰腺癌、腹腔较大肿块的行区域性动脉置管 ,用动脉泵给予 5 Fu)。结果 :治疗组总有效率 (CR PR) 75 6 % ,而对照组总有效率 5 3 6 6 %。两组有显著性差异 (P <0 0 5 )。两组化疗副反应发生率无显著性差异。结论 :射频透热化疗联合全身化疗对晚期消化系统肿瘤可取得较好的近期疗效 ,毒副反应无明显增加     

经胃左动脉灌注化疗联合FOLFOX方案治疗晚期贲门癌临床观察

为了观察经胃左动脉灌注表柔比星(EPI)化疗联合FOLFOX方案治疗晚期贲门癌的疗效及不良反应,对21例晚期贲门癌患者应用经胃左动脉灌注EPI60mg/m2联合FOLFOX方案化疗〔(奥沙利铂(L-OHP)135mg/m2静脉滴入,d1;亚叶酸钙LV150mg/m2静脉推注,d1～d5;5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)500mg/m2静脉滴入,持续16h,d1～d5,21d为1个周期〕。至少2个周期后评价疗效及不良反应。21例患者均可评价疗效,共化疗78个周期,平均3.71个周期。其中CR1例,PR8例,NC9例,PD3例,CR+PR为42.9%,中位TTP为5.4个月,中位生存期8.2个月,1年生存率23.8%(5/21)。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制、脱发及神经性毒性。初步研究结果提示,经胃左动脉灌注EPI化疗联合FOLFOX方案治疗晚期贲门癌近期疗效肯定,不良反应轻微,患者耐受性良好。     

多西他赛联合顺铂和氟尿嘧啶治疗进展期胃癌48例临床分析

目的:观察多西他赛(docetaxel)联合顺铂(DDP)和氟尿嘧啶(5FU)方案(简称DCF方案)对进展期胃癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法:对经病理学或细胞学确诊的48例进展期胃癌患者,采用DCF方案化疗:多西他赛40mg/m2,静脉滴入1h,d1、d8、d15;DDP20mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1～d5;5FU750mg/m2用便携式微量输液泵持续静脉输注,d1～d5;28d为1个周期,至少2个周期评价疗效。结果:48例完全缓解(CR)3例,部分缓解(PR)22例,无变化(NC)16例,进展(PD)7例,总有效率(RR)为52.08%。其中初治组有效率为68.18%(15/22),有2例CR;复治组有效率为38.46%(10/26),有1例CR,两组差异有统计学意义,P=0.04。毒副反应主要为骨髓抑制、消化系统反应和脱发。大部分患者为Ⅰ、Ⅱ度反应,耐受良好。骨髓抑制为剂量限制性毒性,其中白细胞减少占64.58%,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度占16.67%。结论:多西他赛联合DDP和5FU治疗进展期胃癌具有近期疗效好,毒副反应轻,耐受好的特点,且初治者疗效优于复治者,值得进一步研究推广。     

FOLFOX4方案联合顺铂腹腔双路热化疗并全身化疗治疗晚期胃癌38例

 目的　探讨FOLFOX4方案联合顺铂（DDP）腹腔双路热化疗并全身化疗治疗晚期胃癌的临床疗效和安全性。方法　选择38例经病理确诊并分期的晚期胃癌患者行FOLFOX4方案联合DDP腹腔双路热化疗并全身化疗，即行腹腔单点穿刺灌注40～42 ℃的0.9 %NaCl注射液2000～2500 ml + DDP 80～100 mg／m2＋地塞米松10 mg＋呋塞米40 mg的混合液，第1天腹腔注药后给予高频热疗机加热42～43 ℃维持1 h，隔日1次，共4次，在腹腔化疗前0.5 h起给予复方NaCl注射液1000 ml+硫代硫酸钠（STS）20～40 g静脉滴注（12 h），DDP与STS的比例为1∶200，次日STS的剂量减半，静脉滴注12 h，14 d为1周期；奥沙利铂（OXA）85 mg／m2静脉滴注（3 h）第1天；亚叶酸钙（CF）200 mg／m2静脉滴注（2 h）第1、2天；5-氟尿嘧啶（5-Fu）400 mg／m2静脉推注，5-Fu 600 mg／m2，持续静脉滴注22 h，14 d为1个周期，治疗4～6个周期后按WHO评定标准评价疗效和毒副作用。所有患者在应用OXA前1天起均给予硫酸镁、葡萄糖酸钙预防OXA的神经毒性。结果　全组38例患者均可评价疗效，总有效率52.6 %（20／38）。其中，初治18例，CR 3例，PR 9例，总有效率66.7 %；复治20例， 无CR，PR 8例，有效率40.0 %，患者不良反应主要为胃肠道反应、骨髓抑制和末梢神经毒性等。结论　FOLFOX4方案联合DDP腹腔双路热化疗并全身化疗治疗晚期胃癌，近期疗效确切，患者不良反应可耐受，值得进一步探讨。     

全身化疗联合局部热疗治疗晚期胃癌的疗效观察

目的:研究FOLFOX4方案联合射频热疗治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和不良反应.方法:33例患者接受FOLFOX4方案化疗的同时给以热疗.L-OHP(85-100)mg/m2,静脉滴入2h, d1;CF 200mg/m2静脉滴入2h, d1、d2;氟尿嘧啶(5-FU) 400 mg/m2,静脉推注d1、d2,600 mg/m2持续静滴22h,d1、d2;每2周重复, 28天为1周期.热疗每周2次,每次60分钟.3个周期化疗后评价疗效.结果:33例患者 CR 4例(12.1 %) 、PR 13例( 39.4 %) , 有效率(CR+PR)51.5%.不良反应主要为胃肠反应、骨髓抑制和感觉神经毒性.结论: FOLFOX4方案化疗联合热疗应用于晚期胃癌疗效肯定,不良反应能耐受.     

两种化疗方案治疗晚期大肠癌的临床研究

目的 :研究DDP +CF +5 FU及HCPT +CF +5 FU两种方案分别治疗晚期大肠癌的临床疗效、毒副反应和生存质量。方法 :DDP组 2 7例患者 ,DDP 4 0mg ,静脉滴入 ,d1～d3 ;CF 30 0mg ,静脉滴入 ,d1～d5;5 FU 0 5 ,静脉滴入 ,d1～d5。HCPT组 30例患者 ,HCPT 10mg ,静脉推注 ,d1～d10 ;CF及 5 FU方法同DDP组。两种方案均 2 1d为 1个周期 ,连续用 2个周期后评价疗效。结果 :DDP组有效率 37% ,HCPT组有效率 4 0 %。毒副反应为DDP组恶心、呕吐及肾功能损害较HCPT组的严重 ,其余毒副反应两组相近。DDP组与HCPT组临床疗效经统计学处理差异无显著意义。结论 :DDP组与HCPT组临床疗效相当 ,但HCPT组患者的生存质量较好 ,更适用于一些体质较差、术后恢复及年老的患者。     

晚期胃癌非根治性术后腹腔联合静脉化疗与单纯静脉化疗的临床观察

目的：探讨晚期胃癌非根治性术后腹腔热灌注化疗联合FOLFOX4方案静脉化疗的临床疗效及毒副反应。方法：选取青岛市肿瘤医院2002年1月至2005年2月65例晚期胃癌姑息性切除术后患者随机分为两组，治疗组采用术后腹腔热灌注化疗顺铂（DDP）60～80mg/m^2、丝裂霉素（MMC）4～6mg/m^2、5-氟脲嘧啶（5-FU）75mg/m^2，2周为1个周期并联合FOLFOX4（L-OHP85mg/m^2静脉滴注2h，d1；LV200mg/m2静脉滴注2h，d1～2；5-FU400mg/m^2，LV滴完10～20min静脉推注d1～2；5-FU600mg/m2推注后22h，civ，d1～2，2周为1个周期）方案静脉化疗，对照组术后采用单一DF（5-FU500mg/m^2d1～3、LV200mg/m^2d1～3、DDP30～40mg/m^2d1～3，或将5-FU2.4mg/m2经携式微量输注泵在48h内连续注入，每3～4周为1个周期）方案静脉化疗，对65例患者的临床资料作回顾性分析。结果：治疗组1、2、3年生存率分别为83.3%（28/34）、58.8%（20/34）、44.2%（14/34），对照组为83.9%（26/31）、29.0%（9/31）、16.1%（5/31），两组1年生存率比较无显著性差异（P〉0.05），2、3年生存率比较有显著性差异（P〈0.05）；两组化疗毒副反应比较除外周神经损害外无显著性差异。治疗组腹腔化疗并发症主要为腹痛、腹胀、腹泻、便秘。结论：晚期胃癌姑息性切除术后腹腔热灌注化疗联合FOLFOX4静脉化疗在晚期胃癌的综合治疗中是一种有效的治疗措施。     

GP 方案双路腹腔温热灌注化疗并全身化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌临床观察

 目的 探讨晚期胰腺癌腹腔双路温热灌注化疗并全身化疗的效果。方法 选择经病理确诊的晚期胰腺癌患者26例,行腹腔单点穿刺灌注40℃的0.9%的生理盐水2500ml～3500ml＋顺铂80～100mg/m²＋地塞米松10mg＋速尿40mg的混合液d1。腹腔给药的同时,静脉滴注林格氏液1500ml＋硫代硫酸钠（STS）20～40g,12h滴完,顺铂与STS的用量比例为1∶200。次日STS的剂量减半静脉滴注12h;吉西他滨1.0～1.25g/m²ivdripd1,8。3～4周为1周期,共4周期。并观察其疗效及毒副反应。结果 按WHO实体瘤近期疗效评价标准评价,26例患者均可评价,其中位生存期8个月,总有效率为38.5%,主要毒副反应为骨髓抑制。其他毒副反应较轻,一般可以耐受。结论 GP方案行双路腹腔温热灌注化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的临床疗效较好,值得进一步探讨。     

低剂量持续静脉滴注吉西他滨一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究

背景与目的:目前已将吉西他滨联合顺铂作为晚期非小细胞肺癌的一线化疗方案,吉西他滨的常规使用剂量和方法是1000mg/m2半小时静脉滴注,第1、8天,每3周为一个疗程。本研究旨在评价低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的有效性和安全性。方法:48例经病理和/或细胞学检查确诊、未经化疗的晚期非小细胞肺癌患者,采用吉西他滨250mg/m2持续静脉滴注6h,第1、8天,顺铂75mg/m2,每3周为一疗程,连续使用2疗程以上。结果:48例患者中46例可评价疗效,所有患者可评价不良反应。完全缓解率2.2%,部分缓解率30.3%,总有效率为32.5%,中位治疗至进展时间为5.1个月,中位生存时间为10.2个月,1年生存率36.6%。白细胞减少发生率为60.4%,血小板减少发生率为39.5%,Ⅲ～Ⅳ度的白细胞和血小板减少发生率分别为20.8%和12.5%。结论:低剂量吉西他滨持续6h静脉滴注联合顺铂一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效确切、不良反应轻。     

Phase II trial of epirubicin, cisplatin, oral uracil and tegafur, and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The results of chemotherapy for patients with gastric carcinoma generally have been modest, although regimens developed more recently have produced higher response rates. One such regimen is epirubicin, cisplatin, and protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (ECF). The advantage of a long-term oral administration of uracil and tegafur (UFT) is that this treatment may be used to mimic the protracted infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In addition, UFT treatment combined with leucovorin had a favorable activity and tolerable toxicity in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. Instead of the inconvenience of an infusion pump and intravenous catheter for the protracted infusion of 5-FU, the authors administered UFT plus leucovorin in an ECF regimen for the treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with advanced gastric carcinoma received epirubicin, cisplatin, and oral UFT plus leucovorin. Epirubicin 50 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2) were administered on Day 1 by intravenous injection. Tegafur and uracil 360 mg/m(2)/day orally was administered in conjunction with leucovorin administered at a fixed dose of 45 mg/day orally in divided daily doses for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period. These courses were repeated every 4 weeks. The median age of the patients was 59 years with a median World Health Organization performance status of 1. Patients received a median of five courses of treatment (range, 1-10). RESULTS: Among the 47 patients evaluated, three patients achieved complete response, and 24 patients had partial responses, for an overall response rate of 57.5% (95% confidence interval, 71.5-43.3%). Stable disease was reported in 11 patients (23.4%), and another 9 patients (19.1%) showed disease progression. The median duration of survival was 15 months (range, 2-33+). The main toxicity was nausea/vomiting and neutropenia. Significant toxicity (modified National Cancer Institute common toxicity Grade 3 or 4) included neutropenia in 22 patients (42%), nausea in 14(27%), vomiting in 9 (18%), oral mucositis in 3 (6%), and diarrhea in 3 (6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: The authors conclude that epirubicin, cisplatin, and oral UFT plus leucovorin, a convenient regimen, has a significant activity and tolerable toxicities in patients with gastric carcinoma.     

FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌的临床研究

目的研究FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌的疗效和毒副反应。方法5-Fu500mg/m2,静滴6小时以上,第1~5天;EPI60mg/m2,第1天;DDP25~30mg/m2,第1~3天,21天为一周期,完成两周期及以上者作疗效评定。结果34例患者其中CR2例(5.9%),PR12例(35.3%),SD13例(38.2%),PD7例(20.6%),总有效率41.2%,中位缓解期7.9个月,中位生存期10.8个月,1年生存率40.3%。毒副反应以骨髓抑制、胃肠道反应及脱发为主。结论FEP方案治疗晚期和转移性胃癌有效,毒副反应可耐受。     

Extensive cytoreductive surgery combined with intra-operative intraperitoneal perfusion with cisplatin under hyperthermic conditions (OVHIPEC) in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer: a feasibility pilot.

AIMS: The feasibility, morbidity and toxicity of an intensified surgical treatment strategy consisting of aggressive cytoreductive surgery, intra-operative intraperitoneal perfusion of cisplatin and hyperthermia were evaluated in women with recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS: Five heavily pre-treated patients with extensive abdominal tumour bulk entered this pilot study. In all cases aggressive cytoreduction leaving tumour remnants <5 mm in diameter could be performed. This was followed intra-operatively by perfusion of the abdominal cavity with hyperthermic cisplatin 50-70 mg/m(2)for 90 min. During perfusion the intra-abdominal temperature was maintained at 40 degrees C. The median duration of surgery was 10 hours (range 9-11 hours). RESULTS: No major intra- or post-operative complications emerged. Median post-operative ileus (resuming of soft diet) was 11 days (9-13 days). The mean period of hospitalization was 25 days (range 17-42). Toxicity due to i.p. cisplatin was mainly metabolic and of grade 1-2, while no nephrotoxicity was observed. The pharmacokinetics of cisplatin indicated that the maximum concentration of cisplatin measured in the perfusate was 15 times higher than in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that aggressive cytoreduction combined with hyperthermic intra-operative intraperitoneal cisplatin was feasible in a small group of heavily pre-treated ovarian cancer patients with extensive tumour bulk with acceptable morbidity and toxicity. Further studies are required in larger groups of patients to further establish the feasibility of this intensified treatment strategy. We stress that OVHIPEC is not a treatment modality on its own for advanced ovarian cancer. The effectiveness of OVHIPEC is likely to be dependent on the effectiveness of post-operative adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens.     

Three-arm randomized study of two cisplatin-based regimens and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group--EORTC 08975.

PURPOSE: To compare the therapeutic efficacy of paclitaxel plus cisplatin (arm A) versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin (arm B) and arm A versus paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (arm C) in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) or gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) both combined with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 (day 1) or paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 (3-hour infusion, day 1) combined with gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8). Primary end point was comparison of overall survival for B versus A and C versus A. Secondary end points included response rate and duration, progression-free survival, toxicities, quality of life [QoL], and cost of treatment. RESULTS: Four hundred eighty patients (arm A, 159; arm B, 160; arm C, 161 patients) were enrolled; all baseline characteristics were balanced. Median survival times were as follows: arm A, 8.1 months; arm B, 8.9 months; arm C, 6.7 months. Response rates were 31.8% for arm A, 36.6% for arm B, and 27.7% for arm C. Other than myelosuppression (B v A, P <.005), no statistically or clinically significant differences were observed for secondary end points. The average treatment costs were 25% higher in arm C as compared with arms A and B. CONCLUSION: Gemcitabine plus cisplatin and paclitaxel plus gemcitabine do not increase overall survival in patients with advanced NSCLC as compared with paclitaxel plus cisplatin. Treatment was well tolerated, and most QoL parameters were similar, but costs associated with the nonplatinum arm were highest.     

EPLF方案治疗胃癌远处转移临床疗效评价

目的评价EPLF方案治疗胃癌远处转移的疗效和毒副反应.方法表阿霉素(EPI)60mg/m2,静脉推注,第1天;顺铂(DDP)30 mg/m2,静脉滴入2 h,第1～5天;甲酰四氢叶酸钙(LV)150 mg/m2,静脉推注,第1～5天;氟尿嘧啶(5-Fu)500 mg/m2,静脉点滴,持续16 h,第1～5天.28 d为一周期.结果CR 3例(9.4%),PR 12例(37.5%),总有效率(CR PR)46.9%(15/32).主要毒副反应为剂量限制性骨髓抑制,75.0%的患者出现白细胞下降,其中Ⅲ～Ⅳ度占15.6%(5/32),需要配合G-CSF的应用.心电图改变为2例.中位生存期为7.8个月.结论EPLP方案治疗胃癌远处转移疗效较好,毒副反应可耐受,可作为一线用药.     

NP和GP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效分析

目的:评价NP和GP两组化疗方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(nonsmallcelllungcancer,NSCLC)的疗效和不良反应。方法:将有明确的病理学和(或)细胞学诊断的63例晚期NSCLC患者分为两组,NP组33例,国产长春瑞滨(盖诺,NVB)25mg/m2,静脉推注,d1、d8;顺铂(DDP)80～90mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1;GP组30例,吉西他滨(健择,GEM)1.25g/m2,静脉滴入,d1、d8;DDP80～90mg/m2,静脉滴入,d1。两组同时配合水化利尿,每21d为1个周期,化疗3个周期后评价疗效,化疗期间记录不良反应。结果:NP与GP方案的有效率分别为36.3%和40.0%,中位生存时间分别为12.2和12.0个月,1年生存率分别为47.2%和43.5%,2年生存率分别为21.1%和17.8%。不良反应主要为血液学毒性和恶心、呕吐。结论:NP和GP两组化疗方案在治疗晚期NSCLC的近期疗效、中位生存期、1年和2年生存率方面相近,化疗不良反应可耐受。     

健择联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察

目的 :探讨健择 (gemcitabine ,gemzar,GEM)联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC)的疗效。方法 :36例初治晚期NSCLC患者应用健择 1g m2 ,静脉滴入 ,d1、d8,顺铂 10 0mg m2 ,静脉滴入 ,d1,每 2 1d为 1个周期 ,2～ 3个周期后评价疗效和毒副作用。结果 :完全缓解 (CR) 1例 ,部分缓解 (PR) 14例 ,总缓解率 4 1 7% ,中位生存期 39周 ,1年生存率 4 4 4 %。主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和恶心、呕吐。结论 :健择联合顺铂是治疗晚期NSCLC疗效较好方案 ,毒性可耐受。     

Survival outcome of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional dose epirubicin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment

OBJECTIVE: High-dose epirubicin was shown to be effective in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel is synergistic to a conventional dose of anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced cancer. A phase II study was designed to test the effectiveness of combining paclitaxel with a conventional dose of epirubicin in inoperable NSCLC patients. METHODS: Eligibility criteria included inoperable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease and adequate organ function. Epirubicin 70 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 15 min was given on day 1. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 3 h was given on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles. Patients received treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or stable disease after cycle 6. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients received a total of 185 cycles (median 6 cycles). Seventeen patients responded to treatment (response rate 44.7%). Twenty-six (68%) patients received second-line chemotherapy. All patients were followed until their death. Median survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval 9.0-14.9 months). Median time-to-treatment-failure was 4.6 months. CONCLUSION: Conventional dose epirubicin plus paclitaxel is effective as a first-line treatment for inoperable NSCLC patients.