Stability of skeletal class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: rigid internal fixation versus wire osteosynthesis of the mandible.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate skeletal stability after double-jaw surgery for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion to assess whether there were any differences between wire and rigid fixation of the mandible. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven Class III patients had Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plate and screws for maxillary advancement. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback was stabilized with wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation for 6 weeks in 20 patients (group 1) and with rigid internal fixation in 17 patients (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately after surgery, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year after surgery. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. One year after surgery, maxillary sagittal stability was excellent in both groups, and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse observed. In group 1, significant correlations were found between maxillary advancement and relapse at the posterior maxilla and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. In group 2, significant correlations were found between mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the ramus and between mandibular setback and postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the ramus and mandibular relapse. No significant differences in postoperative skeletal and dental stability between groups were observed except for maxillary posterior vertical position. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical correction of Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures appears to be a fairly stable procedure independent of the type of fixation used to stabilize the mandible.     

Stability of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability and time course of postoperative changes after surgical correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures were performed in 40 consecutive patients. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy stabilized with wire osteosynthesis for mandibular setback and low-level Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with plates and screws for maxillary advancement were performed. Maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) was in place for 6 weeks. Lateral cephalograms were taken before surgery, immediately postoperatively, 8 weeks after surgery, and 1 year postoperatively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to vertical maxillary movement at surgery: a maxilla-up group with upward movement of the posterior nasal spine of 2 mm or more (group 1, n = 22), and a minimal vertical change group with less than 2 mm of vertical repositioning (group 2, n = 18). The results indicate that surgical correction of Class III malocclusion with combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies appears to be fairly stable. One year postsurgery, maxillary stability was excellent, with a mean horizontal relapse at point A that represented 10.7% of maxillary advancement in group 1 and 13.4% in group 2. In the vertical plane, maxillary stability was also excellent, with a mean of 0.18 mm of superior repositioning at point A for group 1 and 1.19 mm for group 2. The mandible relapsed a mean of 2.97 mm horizontally at pogonion in group 1 (62% of mandibular setback) and 3.41 mm (49.7% of setback) in group 2. Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with wire osteosynthesis and MMF was not as stable as maxillary advancement and accounted for most of the total horizontal relapse (almost 85%) observed. A trend to relapse was observed for maxillary advancement greater than 6 mm, while the single variable accounting for mandibular relapse in group 1 was the amount of surgical setback. Clockwise rotation of the ascending ramus at surgery was not correlated with mandibular relapse in relation to the type of fixation performed and therefore does not seem to be responsible for relapse.     

Stability of maxillary advancement for correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion after combined maxillary and mandibular procedures: preliminary results of an active control equivalence trial for semirigid and rigid fixation of the maxilla

In this paper preliminary results are presented of a prospective study designed to examine the effect of maxillary fixation methods on postoperative stability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability of Le Fort I osteotomy stabilized with semirigid fixation of the maxilla (SRMF) or rigid fixation of the maxilla (RMF). All patients had skeletal Class III malocclusion and underwent bimaxillary surgery (Le Fort I maxillary advancement with or without superior repositioning and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies of the mandible). Standardized cephalometric analysis was performed on serial radiographs of 42 patients immediately before surgery, 1 week after surgery, after release of fixation, and 1 year postoperatively. The patients were randomized into 2 treatment groups: 23 patients received RMF (group A), and 19 patients received SRMF (group B). Within the groups, patients showed good stability with regard to their baseline characteristics. To show the therapeutic equivalence of the 2 treatments, analysis of the recorded data followed the approach for an equivalence trial. The mean surgical advancement was 5.34 +/- 1.50 mm for group A and 4.51 +/- 1.37 mm for group B. The mean amount of postsurgical relapse was 0.98 +/- 1.27 mm for group A and 0.30 +/- 1.04 mm for group B. Group A patients experienced 93% of their relapse (0.92 mm) during fixation, while group B patients experienced 96% of their relapse (0.29 mm) after release of fixation. RMF provided better stability than SRMF for all maxillary landmarks in the vertical plane. All considered points both in horizontal and vertical plane exhibited full equivalence for 95% confidence intervals, which seems to indicate equivalent stability between the surgical procedures.     

The skeletal stability of one-piece Le Fort 1 osteotomy to advance the maxilla; Part 1. Stability resulting from non-bone grafted rigid fixation

During the past decade, we have increasingly preferred to do a one-piece Le Fort 1 osteotomy to advance the maxilla, sometimes in isolation to treat patients with maxillary retrusive skeletal Class III patients or combined with mandibular advancement to treat bimaxillary retrusive skeletal Class II. Clinical impressions of rigid fixation techniques have indicated that there is improved stability when compared with wire fixation. There are few studies in the literature that have addressed relapse following one-piece Le Fort 1 osteotomy to advance the maxilla. Such surgery involves one single spatial movement and thereby eliminates other possible surgical variables, which may impact on the degree of stability achievable postoperatively. We studied 45 patients who had undergone a uniform one-piece maxillary advancement with elimination of controllable variables, apart from 15 patients who had simultaneous mandibular advancement. Rigid fixation was adopted throughout the study. The mean surgical change documented was 7.42 mm. The mean stability calculated at 12 months revealed a relapse of 0.72 mm (10%). This was not significant (P = 0.3). We conclude that the Le Fort 1 advancement osteotomy is a stable and surgically predictable procedure that gives only slight relapse at 12 months.     

Skeletal stability following maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the stability of combined Le Fort I maxillary impaction and mandibular advancement performed for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusion. Twenty-nine patients, mean age 22.6 years, underwent bimaxillary surgery with rigid internal fixation. Standardised cephalometric analyses were performed using serial lateral cephalometric radiographs. The post-surgical follow-up was a minimum of 12 months, with a mean of 25.2 months. The maxilla was impacted by a mean of 4.3 +/- 3.3 mm, and horizontally advanced by a mean of 2.6 +/- 2.3 mm. The results demonstrated that the maxilla tended to move anteriorly and inferiorly but this was not significant in either horizontal or vertical planes (P > 0.05). The mean advancement of the mandible, at menton, was 10.7 +/- 5.6 mm, and in 14 cases (48.2%) menton was advanced greater than 10 mm. In 34.7% of the patients the mandible underwent posterior movement between 2 and 4 mm. In the vertical plane, gonion moved superiorly by a mean of 2.7 +/- 3.6 mm which was significant. Significant mandibular relapse was found to have occurred in five female patients, with high mandibular plane angles who had undergone large advancements of greater than 10 mm. In conclusion, the majority of patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions maintained a stable result. However, a small number of patients, exhibiting similar characteristics, suffered significant skeletal relapse in the mandible secondary to condylar remodelling and/or resorption.     

Le FortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形

目的：探讨Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开（Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy）上颌骨整体后退术在矫治骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形中的价值。方法：对16例骨性Ⅱ类上颌前突患者（上颌骨前突伴下颌骨后缩14例,其中同时伴颏后缩6例;单纯上颌骨前突2例）进行外科-正畸联合治疗。患者治疗前头影测量∠ANB为7.0°～13.1°,平均9.3°。行Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术,其中14例同期行双侧下颌支矢状骨劈开术（bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy,BSSRO）前移下颌骨,6例行颏成形术（genioplasty）前移颏部。结果：本组行LeFortⅠ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退4～8mm,14例BSSRO下颌骨前移4～7mm,6例颏成形术颏前移6～8mm。1例一侧腭降动脉术中损伤断裂,经结扎处理,无感染及骨块坏死。16例患者伤口均一期愈合。术后及正畸结束后∠ANB为1.6°～3.5°,平均2.9°。结束治疗后随访6～24个月,牙弓形态及[牙合]曲线正常,牙排列整齐,咬合关系良好,外形明显改善,疗效满意。结论：对于骨性Ⅱ类上颌骨前突畸形患者,Le Fort Ⅰ型骨切开上颌骨整体后退术是一种安全、合理、有效的正颌外科术式。     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic correction of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 2. Maxillary advancement.

Nearly half the patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion have maxillary deficiency as the major component of their problem, and modern surgical techniques allow maxillary osteotomy to correct the deformity. Changes at surgery and postsurgically were studied in 49 patients who underwent isolated surgical maxillary advancement. Thirty-one had wire osteosynthesis and maxillomandibular fixation, and 18 had rigid fixation with bone plates. In nearly half the patients, the maxilla was moved down as well as forward, indicating that the patient had both vertical and anteroposterior deficiency. In the anteroposterior plane, 80% of the patients had excellent stability at 1 year, while 20% had 2 to 4 mm of posterior movement of anterior maxillary landmarks. There was no difference in anteroposterior stability between wire/maxillomandibular fixation and rigid internal fixation groups. When the maxilla was moved down as well as forward, there was a strong tendency for relapse upward in both fixation groups. As a result, the chin frequently became more prominent from immediate postsurgery to 1-year followup, as upward movement of the maxilla allowed the mandible to rotate upward and forward.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary and mandibular osteotomy for treatment of class III malocclusion: an analysis of three-dimensional cephalograms.

PURPOSE: The current investigation was undertaken to study the three-dimensional (3-D) stability of simultaneous maxillary advancement and mandibular setback using rigid fixation. The study also aimed to analyse the factors involved in postsurgical relapse by evaluation of changes in various parameters. PATIENTS: Twenty-five cases were evaluated of simultaneous Le Fort I maxillary advancement and mandibular setback using rigid fixation. METHODS: Preoperative, immediate and 6-month postoperative skeletal and dental changes were analysed using 3-D cephalograms obtained from biplanar stereoradiography. Maxillary fixation screws were used as landmarks to evaluate postoperative stability. RESULTS: The mean maxillary advancement was 3.7 mm. Relapse in the sagittal, vertical, and transverse planes was not detectable in the maxilla (p > 0.05). However, for an average mandibular setback of 5.7 mm, mean mandibular relapse was 1.1 mm or 19.3% anteriorly (p < 0.05). Surgical or postsurgical skeletal changes in the maxilla had no detectable influence on mandibular relapse (p > 0.05). Vertical alterations of the facial skeleton achieved surgically predicted the mandibular relapse (R2 = 0.27, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Maxillary advancement and vertical changes of +/- 2 mm did not influence the postoperative stability of the mandible. Relapse of the mandible seems to be influenced mainly by the amount and direction of the surgical alteration of mandibular position.     

Semirigid fixation of the mandible in bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: stability after 18 months.

The stability of osteosynthesis with the use of semirigid mandibular fixation was evaluated in 15 patients who underwent bimaxillary procedures for correction of Class III malocclusion. All patients received rigid fixation (4 miniplates and screws) in the maxilla. Cephalometric evaluation was performed before the operation, immediately after the operation, and at least 18 months after the operation. At the 18-month follow-up, a mean mandibular relapse of 2.2 mm, associated with an additional advancement of the maxilla of 0.27 mm, was observed. The dental relationship was substantially correct. Stability of mandibular fragments in this sample of patients depended on the stability of the maxilla. In addition, neither clinical damage to the temporomandibular joint nor lesions to the neurovascular bundle were detected.     

Long-term skeletal stability after surgical correction in Class III open-bite patients: a retrospective study on 40 patients treated with mono- or bimaxillary surgery

Many reports have paid attention to skeletal stability after orthognathic surgery, but only few focalize attention on patients with III class III malocclusion and open bite. In this article, long-term stability (2 yr) of the maxilla and the mandible after orthognathic surgery in 40 patients with class III malocclusion and anterior open bite is evaluated. The sample has been obtained from those 420 patients with class III malocclusion treated with Le Fort I osteotomy isolated (group A, 20 patients) or in association with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (group B, 20 patients) from 1985 to 2003. On the basis of cephalometric analysis obtained in the immediate postoperative period and 2 years after surgery, in class III patients with anterior open bite treated with mono- or bimaxillary surgery and stabilization with rigid internal fixation, the maxilla was demonstrated to remain in the postsurgical position, whereas a moderate rate of mandibular relapse dependent on the amount of surgical alteration of the mandibular position was present.     

Stability of simultaneous maxillary intrusion and mandibular advancement: A comparison of rigid and nonrigid fixation techniques

This study examines the short-term stability of bimaxillary surgery following Le Fort I impaction with simultaneous bilateral sagittal split osteotomies and mandibular advancement using two standard techniques of postsurgical fixation. Fifteen adults had skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation, and fifteen adults had rigid internal fixation using bone plates in the maxilla and bicortical bone screws between the proximal and distal segments in the mandible. The group with rigid internal fixation did not undergo maxillomandibular fixation. Radiographic cephalograms were analyzed during the postsurgical period to evaluate skeletal and dental stability. There was no statistical difference in postsurgical stability with rigid internal fixation or skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation other than the vertical position of the maxillary molar; the skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation group had a significant amount of postsurgical intrusion of the maxillary molar when compared with the rigid internal fixation group. Although the other measures showed no statistically significant difference between the experimental groups, the amount of variability in postsurgical stability in the group with skeletal plus dental maxillomandibular fixation was greater than that found in the group with rigid internal fixation.     

常见正颌手术后咬合关系的维护和调整

目的 探讨临床常见的正颌手术后,如何很好的维护和调整上下牙列的咬合关系,为临床提供有益的参考.方法 选择骨性Ⅰ类双颌前突行根尖下截骨后徙术、Ⅱ类下颌后缩行下颌升支矢状劈开前徙术、Ⅲ类骨性反骀行下颌升支骨切开后退及合并上颌前徙术各6例患者,共18例患者.正颌手术后依据分类分别行3种不同的牵引模式进行咬合调整.结果 18例...     

Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism

IntroductionResorbable screw fixation for orthognathic surgery is widely used in oral and maxillofacial surgery and has several advantages. However, surgeons are concerned about using resorbable screws in orthognathic surgery because of possible postoperative complications such as relapse, screw fracture, and infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the skeletal stability of bicortical resorbable screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomies for mandibular prognathism.Materials and methodsThis study included 25 patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery fixed with resorbable screws after sagittal split osteotomy at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Five resorbable screws (Inion CPS^®, Inion Ltd., Finland) were applied bicortically at each osteotomy site via a transbuccal approach. No rigid intermaxillary fixation was applied on the first postoperative day. Passive mouth opening exercises were allowed, using two light, rubber elastics for guidance. The control group was 25 patients fixed with four titanium screws. The follow-up period was 12–22 months (mean 17.8 months). Postoperative skeletal changes on lateral cephalometric radiographs were analyzed and compared between the two groups preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and 6 months postoperatively.ResultsThe average setback was 6.9 mm and no major intraoperative complications occurred. One patient experienced infection immediately after surgery that was controlled uneventfully. The data did not demonstrate any significant difference in postoperative skeletal stability between the two groups. Differences between the immediate postoperative state and 6 months after surgery were not significant. In earlier cases, especially for patients with severe mandibular prognathism, immediate postoperative elastic traction was needed for stable occlusal guidance.ConclusionsThe results of this study indicate that bicortical resorbable screws offer a clinically stable outcome for the fixation of mandibular sagittal split osteotomies in mandibular prognathism. However the resorbable screws showed less stable results vertically than the titanium screws.     

Skeletal Class III and open bite treated with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and molar intrusion using titanium screws

Two-jaw surgery has been performed for the treatment of severe skeletal open bite cases to obtain stability of occlusion after treatment. If molar intrusion with titanium screws could be performed instead of surgical superior repositioning of the maxilla, the incidence of surgical invasion would be reduced. However, there have been few reports of such a therapy. This case report describes treatment for skeletal Class III and open bite with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and intrusion of the molars using titanium screws. The patient had a concave profile, a long lower facial height, Class III malocclusion, and excessive anterior open bite following mandibular protrusion and a high mandibular plane angle. The mandible autorotated closed 3.5° following intrusion of the upper and lower molars using titanium screws during the presurgical orthodontic treatment phase. After the autorotation of the mandible, a mandibular setback with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy was performed. The posttreatment records showed a good facial profile and occlusion. The mandible was stable 1 year after surgery. These results demonstrate that surgical orthodontic treatment combined with bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and intrusion of the molars using titanium screws can reduce the need for surgical invasion by avoidance of maxillary surgery and was effective for correcting the facial profile and occlusion in a skeletal Class III and open bite patient.     

Stability after surgical-orthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures

Stability after combined Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies was reviewed in 51 patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion. Because vertical changes in the position of the maxilla affect both the vertical and anteroposterior positions of the mandible, the sample was subdivided by the direction of vertical movement of the maxilla at surgery. Excellent postsurgical stability was observed in the long-face Class III patients in whom upward and forward movement of the maxilla was combined with ramus osteotomy to prevent excessive forward rotation of the mandible. When the maxilla was moved forward and the mandible set back with minimal vertical change, moderate relapse tendencies were observed in both jaws, but most of the correction was maintained at 1 year. When the maxilla was moved down and forward while the mandible was set back, moderate vertical relapse of the maxilla and anteroposterior relapse of the mandible followed. Stability of the downward movement of the maxilla was, on average, better than that resulting from maxillary surgery alone.     

A comparison of the stability of single-piece and segmental Le Fort I maxillary advancements

This study retrospectively evaluated the stability of Le Fort I maxillary advancements and compared segmental and one-piece maxillary osteotomy procedures. A cephalometric analysis was performed on 26 cases of maxillary advancement. The sample comprised 11 cases of one-piece and 15 cases of segmental maxillary procedures. The tracings were superimposed and digitized by computer software, and the skeletal changes were analyzed before surgery, immediately after surgery, and at a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Different values were compared by the paired and nonpaired t tests and were correlated by the Pearson correlation test. The significant value was set at a 95% confidence interval. The maxilla was advanced by a mean of 5.0 +/- 1.6 mm (P < 0.001), and the anterior maxilla was repositioned inferiorly by a mean of 1.5 +/- 3.3 mm (P < 0.05). The maxilla relapsed posteriorly by a mean of 0.6 +/- 1.2 mm (P < 0.05) and superiorly at the anterior maxilla by a mean of 0.8 +/- 1.1 mm (P < 0.001). Overjet and overbite did not significantly change (P > 0.05). It was concluded that maxillary advancement using rigid fixation and interpositional bone grafting in both groups was a stable procedure, particularly in the horizontal plane. In the one-piece group, there was a significantly higher relapse in the vertical plane than in the segmental group (P < 0.05), however. Minor skeletal relapse was compensated for by postoperative tooth movement, and segmental procedures are recommended when required to enhance occlusal results.     

Short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery

This study analyzes short- and long-term skeletal relapse after mandibular advancement surgery and determines its contributing factors. Thirty-two consecutive patients were treated for skeletal Class II malocclusion during the period between 1986 and 1989. They all had combined orthodontic and surgical treatment with BSSO and rigid fixation excluding other surgery. Of these, 15 patients (47%) were available for a long-term cephalography in 2000. The measurement was performed based on the serial cephalograms taken preoperatively; 1 week, 6 months and 14 months postoperatively; and at the final evaluation after an average of 12 years. Mean mandibular advancement was 4.1 mm at B-point and 4.9 mm at pogonion. Representing surgical mandibular ramus displacement, gonion moved downwards 2 mm immediately after surgery. During the short-term postoperative period, mandibular corpus length decreased only 0.5 mm, indicating that there was no osteotomy slippage. After the first year of observation, skeletal relapse was 1.3 mm at B-point and pogonion. The relapse continued, reaching a total of 2.3 mm after 12 years, corresponding to 50% of the mandibular advancement. Mandibular ramus length continuously decreased 1 mm during the same observation period, indicating progressive condylar resorption. No significant relationship between the amount of initial surgical advancement and skeletal relapse was found. Preoperative high mandibulo-nasal plane (ML-NL) angle appears to be associated with long-term skeletal relapse.     

Skeletal stability after mandibular advancement with rigid versus wire fixation.

PURPOSE: This study examined the stability of skeletal changes after mandibular advancement surgery with rigid or wire fixation up to 2 years postoperatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Subjects for this multisite, prospective, clinical trial received rigid (n = 78) or wire (n = 49) fixation. The rigid cases were fixed with three 2-mm bicortical position screws and 1 to 2 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with elastics, and the wire fixation subjects were fixed with inferior border wires and had 6 weeks of skeletal maxillomandibular fixation with 24-gauge wires. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained before orthodontics, immediately before surgery, and at 1 week, 8 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Linear cephalometric changes were referenced to a cranial base coordinate system. RESULTS: Before surgery, both groups were balanced with respect to linear and angular measurements of craniofacial morphology. Mean anterior sagittal advancement of the mandibular symphysis was 4.92 +/3.01 mm in the rigid group and 5.11 +/- 3.09 mm in the wire group, and the inferior vertical displacement was 3.37 +/- 2.44 in the rigid group and 2.85 +/- 1.78 in the wire group. The vertical changes were similar in both groups. Two years postsurgery, the wire group had 30% sagittal relapse of the mandibular symphysis, whereas there was no change in the rigid group (P < .001). Both groups experienced changes in the orientation and configuration of the mandible. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid fixation is a more stable method than wire fixation for maintaining mandibular advancement after sagittal split ramus osteotomy.     

Fixation of bimaxillary osteotomies with resorbable plates and screws: experience in 20 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the potential effectiveness of resorbable plate and screw fixation for skeletal stabilization of simultaneously performed maxillary and mandibular osteotomies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients underwent simultaneous maxillary and mandibular osteotomies that were fixed using copolymeric poly L-lactic acid/polyglycolic acid (PLLA/PGA) plates and screws. Prefabricated acrylic intermediate and final splints were used as guides and then removed at completion of the surgery. Guidance elastics were applied at 2 weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: The LeFort I osteotomies included segmentalizations with and without bone grafts (7/20), impactions (4/20), advancements (8/20), and unilateral downgrafting with a bone graft (2/20)- one of which was segmental. The mandibular sagittal split osteotomies involved advancements (11/20), setbacks (5/20), and asymmetric rotation (4/20). Three patients had simultaneous genioplasties, which were also stabilized with resorbable fixation. All maxillae were fixed with four 2.0-mm L-shaped plates and screws. The mandibular rami were maintained with three 2.5-mm bicortical screws per side. The mandibular symphyseal segments were held in position with two or three 2.5 mm bicortical screws. All surgeries were accomplished uneventfully, and no problems in the immediate postoperative stability of the occlusion were encountered. Follow-up ranged from 12 to 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: The initial clinical findings suggest that this form of bone fixation is a viable alternative to standard metallic fixation techniques for certain maxillomandibular deformities in which excessive bony movements are not performed. Differences exist in both intraoperative application and postoperative management of masticatory function. This is partially a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.     

Long-term results in maxillary deficiency using intraoral devices

Cleft lip and palate patients often present maxillary retrusion and class III malocclusion after cleft repair. Maxillary distraction is a technique that can provide simultaneous skeletal advancement and expansion of soft tissue. Twelve patients with cleft maxillary deficiency due to cleft lip and palate were treated by Le Fort I osteotomy and two intraoral distraction devices that were activated after 4 days of latency period, 1mm per day on both sides. Long-term clinical and cephalometric evaluation of one and two years demonstrate stable results concerning the skeletal, dental and soft tissue relations. In this paper we discuss the advantages of distraction osteogenesis as a method for treatment of maxillary deficiency in cleft patients in terms of stability and relapse. The indications for maxillary distraction: (1) Moderate and severe retrusion that needs large advancement as in cleft lip and palate patients. (2) Forward and downward lengthening of the maxilla with no need for intermediate bone graft. (3) Growing patients. In conclusion, maxillary distraction in moderate or severe retrusion, as in cleft patients offers marked maxillary advancement with long-term stability.