Family Medicine Spokane Rural Training Track: 24 years of rural-based graduate medical education

Twenty percent of the US population lives in rural communities, but only about 9% of the nation's physicians practice in those communities. There is little doubt that the more highly specialized physicians are, the less likely they are to practice or settle in rural areas. There is clearly a population threshold below which it is not feasible for specialist (in contrast to generalist) physicians to pursue the specialty in which they have trained. Much of rural America falls below that threshold. This leaves large geographic areas of America to the primary care physician. The proportional supply of family physicians to specialists increases as urbanization decreases. Family physicians are the largest single source of physicians in rural areas. Family medicine residency programs based in rural locations provide a critical mechanism for addressing rural primary care needs. Graduates from rural residency programs are three times more likely to practice in rural areas than urban residency program graduates. There are two primary goals of training residents in rural areas: producing more physicians who will practice in rural areas and producing physicians who are better prepared for the personal and professional demands of rural practice. Rural Training Tracks, where the first year of residency is completed in an urban setting and the second and third years at a rural site (1-2 model), initially proposed by Family Medicine Spokane in 1985, have been highly successful in placing and maintaining more than 70% of their graduates in rural communities. Similar and modifications of the "Spokane RTT model" have been established around the country. Now, more than 24 years of educational experience has been accumulated and can be applied to further development of these successful family medicine residency programs.     

Use of and Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine Among Family Practice Patients in Small Rural Illinois Communities

CONTEXT: Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use continues to increase in the United States. Data on rural patients' use and extent of integration of CAM with conventional medicine are lacking, although this is a population often associated with use of "folk remedies" and self-care strategies. PURPOSE: To examine rural primary care patients' attitudes toward and use of CAM. METHODS: A total of 176 surveys (70% response rate) were returned by patients at 5 geographically dispersed, rural Illinois family practice clinics to examine rural patients' use of, attitudes toward, and experiences with alternative medicine and providers. FINDINGS: Nearly two thirds of patients reported use of alternative medicine. Therapies most often used were vitamins/megavitamins, chiropractic, relaxation, and prayer/faith healing. Rural patients with more medical problems and a higher level of education were more likely to use alternative techniques. Three fifths of the patients felt that their doctor should discuss alternative medicine and therapies with them. CONCLUSIONS: Physician understanding and communication regarding CAM may be especially important in rural areas, where access to care is more limited and where there is greater reliance on the primary care physician as a "gatekeeper" for patient health.     

Use of cooperative health statistics system physician data in small area manpower needs assessment: the case of rural Colorado.

Maldistribution with respect of medical practice location and specialty continues to present barriers to quality care for many Americans. Residents of rural communities in Colorado often lack access to health care services appropriate in number and nature to their needs. A valid determination of the severity of inaccessibility of medical care is a prerequisite to effective programming for alleviating the problem. Any such needs assessment must be predicated on the use of a reliable, detailed physician manpower data base. Physician data used in evaluating the adequacy of health care delivery systems serving small or sparsely populated rural areas have traditionally proved inadequate, causing loss of credibility in the findings derived from those efforts. A concerted attempt was made in rural Colorado to establish a physician inventory for identifying health manpower shortage areas and assessing the degree of medical underservice. This undertaking was organized and directed by staff members of the Statewide Educational Activities for Rural Colorado''s Health (SEARCH) program, the area health education center program of the University of Colorado Health Sciences Center. Cooperative Health Statistics Systems (CHSS) physician data, collected in an annual survey conducted by the Colorado Department of Health, were determined to be exceptionally accurate in describing the physician manpower practicing in the State''s federally designated medically underserved counties. CHSS proved to be an outstanding source of physician data upon which small area manpower needs assessment can be based for the purpose of designating medically underserved or health manpower shortage areas.     

Extending rural and remote medicine with a new type of health worker: physician assistants

The purpose of this paper was to demonstrate that the medical workforce shortage is an international phenomenon and to review one of the strategies developed in the USA in the late 1960s: the physician assistant model of health service provision. The authors consider whether this model could provide one strategy to help address the medical workforce shortage in Australia. A systematic review of the literature about medical workforce shortages, strategies used to address the medical workforce shortage, and the physician assistant role was undertaken. Literature used for the review covered the period 1967-2006. Physician assistants provide safe, high-quality and cost-effective primary care services under the direction of a doctor and respond to workforce shortages in rural and remote areas, family practice medicine and hospital settings. This model of health care provision has been adopted in several other developed countries, including England, Scotland, the Netherlands and Canada. The physician assistant concept might provide Australia with a novel strategy for addressing its medical workforce shortage, particularly in rural and remote settings.     

Rural health around the world: challenges and solutions

Despite the huge differences between developing and developed countries, access is the major issue in rural health around the world. Even in the countries where the majority of the population lives in rural areas, the resources are concentrated in the cities. All countries have difficulties with transport and communication, and they all face the challenge of shortages of doctors and other health professionals in rural and remote areas. Many rural people are caught in the poverty- ill health-low productivity downward spiral, particularly in developing countries. Since 1992, WONCA, the World Organization of Family Doctors, has developed a specific focus on rural health through the WONCA Working Party on Rural Practice. This Working Party has drawn national and international attention to major rural health issues through World Rural Health Conferences and WONCA Rural Policies. The World Health Organization (WHO) has broadened its focus beyond public health to partnership with family practice, initially through a landmark WHO-WONCA Invitational Conference in Canada. From this has developed the Memorandum of Agreement between WONCA and WHO which emphasizes the important role of family practitioners in primary health care and also includes the Rural Health Initiative. In April 2002, WHO and WONCA held a major WHO-WONCA Invitational Conference on Rural Health. This conference addressed the immense challenges for improving the health of people of rural and remote areas of the world and initiated a specific action plan: The Global Initiative on Rural Health. The "Health for All" vision for rural people is more likely to be achieved through joint concerted efforts of international and national bodies working together with doctors, nurses and other health workers in rural areas around the world.     

Differential Effects of Economic Factors on Specialist and Family Physician Distribution in Illinois: A County-Level Analysis

CONTEXT: Uneven distribution of physicians across geographic areas of the United States remains a significant problem that may have implications for health. PURPOSE: To develop a statistical model of physician distribution in Illinois counties that predicts where specialists and family physicians practice, and to suggest policy strategies for alleviating shortages. METHODS: Three-stage least squares, an estimation technique, was utilized to create a model where 19 variables suggested by the literature predicted specialist and family physician distribution within geographic areas, specifically counties in Illinois. FINDINGS: Non-economic quality of life factors seemed to be related to specialist physician practice location (eg, percent graduates and professionals located in the area, public school expenditures, nonpublic teachers per capita, and sufficient hospital beds). In contrast, economic factors were related to family physician practice location (eg, per capita income, total population [an indicator of demand for medical care]). CONCLUSION: Indicators suggest quality of life factors appear important in specialist location and retention, whereas indicators suggest economic factors appear important to family physician location and retention. Subsidies are suggested to encourage more family physicians to locate and remain in rural areas.     

Childhood immunization practices of primary care physicians.

OBJECTIVE: To assess if immunization utilization practices differ between rural and urban primary care physicians in Kentucky. DESIGN: Survey of 200 primary care physicians. PARTICIPANTS: Pediatricians, family physicians, and general practitioners in Kentucky. SELECTION PROCEDURES: Participants completed a 20-item questionnaire that surveyed selected demographics with regard to the physician and practice, immunizations offered to children, and reasons why the responding physicians did not offer immunizations and where they referred patients for this service. RESULTS: Physicians practicing in rural counties offered immunizations to their patients less frequently than did urban physicians (54% vs 77%). Rural and urban physicians cited immunization costs to patients as the chief reason that immunizations were not used more often and referred patients primarily to county health departments. CONCLUSIONS: Rising costs have limited physician use of immunizations in rural areas to a greater extent than that seen in urban areas. This may make access to immunizations more difficult for children living in rural areas.     

The Rural Physician Workforce in Florida: A Survey of US- and Foreign-Born Primary Care Physicians

CONTEXT: To meet the challenge of primary care needs in rural areas, continuing assessment of the demographics, training, and future work plans of practicing primary care physicians is needed. PURPOSE: This study's goal was to assess key characteristics of primary care physicians practicing in rural, suburban, and urban communities in Florida. METHODS: Surveys were mailed to all of Florida's rural primary care physicians (n = 399) and a 10% sampling (n = 1236) of urban and suburban primary care physicians. FINDINGS: Responses from 1000 physicians (272 rural, 385 urban, 343 suburban) showed that rural physicians were more likely to have been raised in a rural area, foreign-born and trained, a National Health Service Corps member, or a J-1 visa waiver program participant. Rural physicians were more likely to have been exposed to rural medical practice or living in a rural environment during their medical school and residency training. Factors such as rural upbringing and medical school training did not predict future rural practice with foreign-born physicians. Overall, future plans for practice did not seem to differ between rural, urban, and suburban physicians. CONCLUSIONS: Recruiting and retaining doctors in rural areas can be best supported through a mission-driven selection of medical students with subsequent training in medical school and residency in rural health issues. National programs such as the National Health Service Corps and the J-1 visa waiver program also play important roles in rural physician selection and should be taken into account when planning for future rural health care needs.     

Graduates' Reflections on Their Rural Medical Education: The Upper Peninsula Campus Experience

A comprehensive graduate evaluation study was conducted by the Upper Peninsula campus of Michigan State University's College of Human Medicine in 1990. The purpose of this qualitative study was to describe the effects of the program's philosophy, curriculum, and general operational features on the 56 physician graduates from the program during 1978-1989. All practicing graduates were interviewed in their practice locations and residents were interviewed by telephone. Forty-six percent of the upper peninsula graduates are practicing in primary care specialities (family practice, general pediatrics, general internal medicine) and 41 percent are living in cities of less than 50,000 population. The overall findings identify several factors that were significant to the graduates, such as excellent role models, problem-focused curriculum, and early applied clinical work in an ambulatory, primary care, rural setting. Based on the data, the program attracts students who are satisfied with its innovative medical education.     

The Attitudes of Rural Minnesota Family Physicians Toward Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants

Increased use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants has been promoted as a possible solution to the shortage of primary care providers in rural locations. If the use of nonphysician providers is to be optimized in these areas, awareness and acceptance of their capabilities by rural family physicians is essential. This study surveyed the attitudes of rural Minnesota family physicians toward the use of physician assistants and nurse practitioners. Forty-six percent of the 600 rural family physicians surveyed responded to the questionnaire. Approximately 90 percent of responding physicians indicated a high degree of confidence in the abilities of nonphysician providers in the areas of preventive and routine care; some concern was expressed about the proficiency of nonphysician providers taking call, covering the emergency room, and doing hospital rounds--activities that involve a broader base of clinical knowledge and diagnostic skills. Other concerns were an increased workload for physicians due to their assumed supervisory roles, an increase in complexity of cases seen by physicians, increased physician liability, job competition between nonphysician providers and physicians, and the lack of educational opportunities and supervisory guidelines for physicians regarding collaborative relationships. Appropriate roles for family physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants are not well-defined in the minds of respondents, and it appears future acceptance and practice patterns will depend on how these roles are established and accepted.     

Education of Physician Assistants, Nurse Midwives, and Nurse Practitioners for Rural Practice

Physician assistants, nurse midwives, and nurse practitioners have been described as a vital and unique solution to the problem of providing adequate access to high quality health care for many Americans. Each of these classifications of health care providers has been accepted as separate professions with their own standards and identities. Their curricula and educational pathways have developed into clearly distinguishable educational tracks that complement the larger disciplines of nursing and medicine. Physician assistants, nurse midwives, and nurse practitioners have been singled out in federal legislation for their potential contribution to underserved rural communities (e.g., the Rural Health Clinics Services Act of 1977 and its subsequent amendments). This designation is partly due to the fact that certified nurse midwives, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants traditionally chose to practice in rural, underserved areas, and because their skills and practice structures were well matched to the needs and resources of rural areas. That pattern of practice, however, appears to have changed and the distribution of these practitioners has begun to resemble the distribution of physicians and other clinicians with heavy concentrations in urban areas and a growing shortage in rural and underserved areas.     

Ambulatory care trends in Germany: a road toward more integration of care?

Traditionally, Germany has a weak primary care system. In addition, the number of general practitioners (GPs) has declined in the past years. Main challenges are an aging population, disintegration of care, variations in care, an increase in chronic conditions, and a shortage of GPs especially in rural areas. Policy reacted by implementing financial incentives for GPs in rural areas and special GP training programs. Improvements in chronic care aim to better integrate care through Disease Management Programs, the electronic health card, and voluntary primary care schemes. The largest challenge to be addressed is the delegation of physician tasks to physician assistants.     

An innovation in Australian dental education: rural, remote and Indigenous pre-graduation placements

Anticipating the looming crisis in access to dental services in rural and remote areas, the Western Australian Centre for Rural and Remote Oral Health developed an undergraduate rural placement program to provide dental students of The University of Western Australia opportunities for direct experience of rural and remote practice during the final year of the undergraduate curriculum. The Rural, Remote and Indigenous Placement program started in 2002 and, to the end of 2005, had placed 78 final year dental students in supervised clinical practice in rural, remote or Indigenous practice. In this study, the evolution of the program (2002-2005) is described and student evaluation of the program is reported. While involved in the rural placement program, students were assessed by experienced dental practitioners and provided program evaluation. This structured feedback allowed continuous improvement of the program. Data from each year's graduates was also analysed to examine the question of influence of placements on practice location during the first 6 months after graduation. Although it will be many years before the effects of outplacement programs can be specifically attained, the evidence to date indicates that the program may be a valuable tool among the plethora of strategies being investigated to augment Australia's rural oral health workforce.     

Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005: Case Study of a Second-Generation Rural Medical Education Program

ABSTRACT

A pipeline model has been suggested to increase the rural physician supply. This study is an institutional case report used to describe the context, development, and in-house evaluation of the University of Alabama Rural Health Leaders Pipeline, 1990–2005. This program was developed at a University of Alabama School of Medicine branch campus to target rural students at multiple levels, elementary schools through residency, and includes a minority focus. Requirements to enter the medical program include living 8 years in rural Alabama, meeting admission requirements, and affinity for rural lifestyles. Twenty-six percent of 316 high school participants, all 40 students in the minority-focused college program, and 3% of 90 medical program students were African American. The program includes (1) puppet shows in elementary schools depicting different health professions, (2) Rural Health Scholars Program for 11th-grade students, (3) Minority Rural Health Pipeline Program for college students, (4) Rural Medical Scholars Program, a 5-year track of study in rural community health and medicine, and (5) assured admission to family medicine residency. Outcomes studied in this case report included medical school performance, graduation rate, selection of family medicine specialty, and rural practice location. Medical scholars were anticipated to experience academic difficulty, select family medicine specialty, and locate in rural practice more often than peers. Compared to peers, medical scholars showed lower scores on preclinical courses and USMLE steps 1 and 2, reflective of their lower MCAT and GPA scores, but had (1) similar graduation rates (95% vs peers 84%), (2) higher family medicine selection rate (47% vs Huntsville 27% vs Tuscaloosa 12% vs Birmingham 4% [OR compared to Birmingham 22.7, 95% CI 10.5–49.4]), and (3) higher rural practice rate (67% vs peers 14% vs national group 9%) in the first RMSP classes. Based on these important outcomes being better than or equal to the traditional student cohorts, the institution concluded that the Rural Health Leaders Pipeline demonstrates successful use of the rural pipeline model.     

National Health Service Corps Staffing and the Growth of the Local Rural Non-NHSC Primary Care Physician Workforce

CONTEXT: Beyond providing temporary staffing, National Health Service Corps (NHSC) clinicians are believed by some observers to contribute to the long-term growth of the non-NHSC physician workforce of the communities where they serve; others worry that NHSC clinicians compete with and impede the supply of other local physicians. PURPOSE: To assess long-term changes in the non-NHSC primary care physician workforce of rural underserved counties that have received NHSC staffing support relative to workforce changes in underserved counties without NHSC support. METHODS: Using data from the American Medical Association and NHSC, we compared changes from 1981 to 2001 in non-NHSC primary care physician to population ratios in 2 subsets of rural whole-county health professional shortage areas: (1) 141 counties staffed by NHSC physicians, nurse practitioners, and/or physician assistants during the early 1980s and for many of the years since and (2) all 142 rural health professional shortage area counties that had no NHSC clinicians from 1979 through 2001. FINDINGS: From 1981 to 2001, counties staffed by NHSC clinicians experienced a mean increase of 1.4 non-NHSC primary care physicians per 10,000 population, compared to a smaller, 0.57 mean increase in counties without NHSC clinicians. The finding of greater non-NHSC primary care physician to population mean ratio increase in NHSC-supported counties remained significant after adjusting for baseline county demographics and health care resources (P < .001). The estimated number of "extra" non-NHSC physicians in NHSC-supported counties in 2001 attributable to the NHSC was 294 additional physicians for the 141 supported counties, or 2 extra physicians, on average, for each NHSC-supported county. Over the 20 years, more NHSC-supported counties saw their non-NHSC primary care workforces grow to more than 1 physician per 3,500 persons, but no more NHSC-supported than nonsupported counties lost their health professional shortage area designations. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the NHSC contributed positively to the non-NHSC primary care physician workforce in the rural underserved counties where its clinicians worked during the 1980s and 1990s.     

Perspectives on Rural Health Workforce Issues: Illinois-Arkansas Comparison

ABSTRACT:  Context: Past research has documented rural physician and health care professional shortages. Purpose: Rural hospital chief executive officers' (CEOs') reported shortages of health professionals and perceptions about recruiting and retention are compared in Illinois and Arkansas. Methods: A survey, previously developed and sent to 28 CEOs in Illinois, was mailed to 110 CEOs in Arkansas. Only responses from rural CEOs are presented (Arkansas n = 39 and Illinois n = 22). Findings: Physician shortages were reported by 51 CEOs (83.6%). Most reported physician shortages in Arkansas were for family medicine, internal medicine, cardiology, obstetrics-gynecology, general surgery, and psychiatry. Most reported physician shortages in Illinois were for family medicine, obstetrics-gynecology, orthopedic surgery, internal medicine, cardiology, and general surgery. Additionally, registered nurses and pharmacists were the top 2 allied health professions shortages. Multivariate analysis (factor and discriminant analyses) examined community attributes associated with ease of recruiting physicians. Six factors were identified and assessed as to their importance in influencing ease of recruitment, with the state included in the model. Three factors were identified as discriminating whether or not physician recruitment was easy: community supportive for family, community cooperates and perceives a good future, and community attractiveness. Conclusions: Similarities in shortages and attributes influencing recruitment in both states suggest that efforts and policies in health professions workforce development can be generalized between regions. This study further reinforces some important known issues concerning retention and recruitment, such as the importance of identifying providers whose preferences are matched to the characteristics and lifestyle of a given area.     

Development of a common national questionnaire to evaluate student perceptions about the Australian Rural Clinical Schools Program

The Australian Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing provided funds for the Australian medical schools to establish Rural Clinical Schools. This workforce initiative has enabled medical students to learn in a diverse range of rural and remote healthcare settings. A common questionnaire was developed and agreed on by all the directors of the Rural Clinical Schools. Use of this common questionnaire will facilitate reports on student attitudes and program outcomes, both within individual Rural Clinical Schools and at a national program level. The data analysis will inform the community and the Australian Government about the effectiveness of the national Rural Clinical School program in (1) meeting the primary aims of providing high quality rural medical education; and (2) addressing the medical workforce shortage in rural and remote areas.     

Relationship between US medical school admission policy and graduates entering family practice

Rural areas in the United States continue to lack an adequate supply of primary care doctors, particularly family physicians, despite the oversupply of physicians nationally. Previous studies have provided strong evidence that students from rural backgrounds, as well as those who expressed an interest at the time of medical school admission for a career in family medicine, are significantly more likely to eventually practise family medicine in rural areas than their peers. US medical schools were classified into three groups based on their written selection factors for preferentially admitting students into the graduating class of 1982. Of those schools with selection factors for students from both a rural background and an interest in a future career in family medicine, 23.7% of their graduates entered family medicine training programmes. This compares with 14.5% of graduates from schools with a preference for students from a rural background, and 12.4% from all other schools (P less than 0.001). Coupled with previous data which shows that family physicians from rural areas are more likely to eventually practise in rural areas than their peers, preferentially admitting students from rural backgrounds interested in a career in family medicine could help to solve the problem of the shortage of primary care physicians in rural areas in the US.     

Why Rural Residents Migrate for Family Physician Care

Several studies have examined why rural residents bypass local hospitals, but few have explored why they migrate for physician care. In this study, data from a random mail survey of households in rural Iowa counties were used to determine how consumers' attitudes about their local health system, health beliefs, health insurance coverage and other personal characteristics influenced their selection of local vs. nonlocal family physicians (family physician refers to the family practice, internal medicine or other medical specialist providing an individual's primary care). Migration for family physician care was positively associated with a perceived shortage of local family physicians and use of nonlocal specialty physician care. Migration was negatively associated with a highly positive rating of the overall local health care system, living in town, Lutheran religious affiliation and private health insurance coverage. By understanding why rural residents prefer to bypass local physicians, rural health system managers, physicians and policy-makers should be better prepared to design innovative health organizations and programs that meet the needs of rural consumers.