Local anesthesia for functional endoscopic sinus surgery employing small volumes of epinephrine-containing solutions of lidocaine produces profound hypotension

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic containing epinephrine is commonly used in many operations for the main purpose of hemostasis. A randomized, controlled, prospective clinical trial was designed to find out hemodynamic changes after local infiltration of different concentrations and/or different dosages of epinephrine during functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) under general anesthesia. METHODS: One hundred and eight adult patients undergoing elective FESS under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into four groups. Group I received 2% lidocaine 2 ml with epinephrine (5 microg/ml); group II received 1% lidocaine 4 ml with epinephrine (2.5 microg/ml); group III received 1% lidocaine 4 ml with epinephrine (5 microg/ml); and group IV received 1% lidocaine 4 ml for local infiltration. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were monitored continuously in the radial artery and recorded in 6 min: before infiltration (baseline), 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 3.5, 4, 5, and 6 min after local infiltration. The lowest blood pressure (BP) in this period was also recorded. RESULTS: Significant hemodynamic changes, particularly a decrease in BP (P < 0.001) with a slight increase in HR (P < 0.001) at approximately 1.5 min and an increase in SBP at approximately 3 min (P < 0.01) after local infiltration, were observed in group I, group II and group III compared with the baseline, but not in group IV. No significant hemodynamic differences were observed between group I, group II and group III at the same time points (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Local infiltration of low-dose epinephrine causes temporary significant hemodynamic changes particularly a marked decrease in BP during FESS under general anesthesia.     

Evaluating hemodynamic and T wave criteria of simulated intravascular test doses using bupivacaine or isoproterenol in anesthetized children

An increase in T wave amplitude > or =25% is a reliable indicator for detecting intravascular injection of lidocaine-epinephrine test dose in anesthetized children. We examined whether a simulated IV test dose containing bupivacaine instead of lidocaine, and isoproterenol instead of epinephrine, produces reliable changes in heart rate (HR) and T wave morphology. One hundred healthy infants and children (6-72 mo) were randomized to one of five groups (n = 20 each) during 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration sevoflurane and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen: atropine pretreatment (0.01 mg/kg IV) followed by 0.25% bupivacaine containing epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg IV, atropine followed by normal saline, atropine followed by 1% lidocaine containing isoproterenol 0.1 microg/kg, saline pretreatment followed by the lidocaine-isoproterenol test dose, and saline followed by saline. HR was recorded every 20 s and T wave amplitude of lead II was continuously recorded. All patients receiving the bupivacaine-epinephrine test dose and none receiving saline met the HR (positive if > or =10 bpm increase) and T wave criteria (positive if > or =25% increase in amplitude). The isoproterenol-containing test dose produced positive responses based only on the HR criterion with or without atropine pretreatment. Our results indicate that HR and T wave changes are useful if a bupivacaine-epinephrine test dose is used and that HR is the only useful indicator if an isoproterenol-containing test dose is used in sevoflurane-anesthetized children. IMPLICATIONS: To determine if an epidurally administered local anesthetic has been unintentionally injected into a blood vessel, a small dose of epinephrine or isoproterenol may be added to a local anesthetic. We found that an increase in heart rate > or =10 bpm and an increase in T wave amplitude of lead II >or =25% are useful indicators for detecting accidental intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized children, whereas only a heart rate change is a reliable diagnostic tool if an isoproterenol-containing test dose is used.     

Efficacy of an epidural test dose in children anesthetized with halothane

The effect of an intravenous (iv) injection of lidocaine with epinephrine was studied to determine if such a test dose would cause a reliably detectable increase in heart rate and systemic blood pressure in children anesthetized with halothane and nitrous oxide. The effect of the injection of atropine before the test dose on these parameters was also determined. Sixty-five children 1 month to 11 yr of age and weighing 3.9-35 kg were studied. The children were assigned to one of four groups, each of which was anesthetized with 1% halothane and 50% nitrous oxide. Group 1 (n = 20) received 10 micrograms/kg atropine followed 5 min later by an iv dose of 0.1 ml/kg 1% lidocaine with 1/200,000 epinephrine (0.5 micrograms/kg) to simulate an intravascularly administered epidural test dose. Group 2 (n = 21) was identical to group 1 but did not receive atropine prior to the simulated intravascular test dose. Groups 3 (n = 12) and 4 (n = 11) were identical to groups 1 and 2, but the simulated intravascular test dose did not contain epinephrine: group 3 received atropine prior to the test dose and group 4 did not. The simulated intravascular test dose increased heart rate in group 1 (with atropine) at each time period from 15 to 120 s, but only at 45 and 60 s in group 2 (without atropine). Following the iv test dose, 6 of 21 children in group 2 had an increase in heart rate of less than 10 beats/min, while only one child in group 1 had an increase in heart rate of less than 10 beats/min. Intravenous test doses that did not contain epinephrine (groups 3 and 4) had no effect on heart rate or blood pressure. Atropine, 10 micrograms/kg, improves the reliability of an epidural test dose in children anesthetized with halothane and nitrous oxide but does not ensure total reliability in detecting an intravascular injection.     

The efficacy of hemodynamic and T-wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of epinephrine test dose in propofol-anesthetized adults

A recent study demonstrated 100% effectiveness of hemodynamic criteria during propofol anesthesia, when a full dose of an epinephrine (15 microg)-containing test dose was injected intravascularly. We designed this dose-response study to determine minimal effective epinephrine doses and efficacies of hemodynamic and T-wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of the epinephrine test dose in propofol-anesthetized adults. Eighty healthy adult patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups according to a simulated IV test dose using propofol (133 microg center dot kg(-1) center dot min(-1)) and nitrous oxide (FIO(2) = 0.33) anesthesia after endotracheal intubation (n = 20 each). The Saline group received 3 mL of normal saline IV; the Epinephrine-15 group received 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing 15 microg epinephrine; and the Epinephrine-10 and -5 groups received 2 and 1 mL of the test dose of the identical components, respectively. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and lead II of the electrocardiogram were recorded continuously for 5 min after the IV injection of the study drug via a peripheral vein. Sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained based on the modified HR (positive if greater-than-or-equal to 10 bpm increase) and the T-wave (positive if greater-than-or-equal 25% in amplitude) criteria if greater-than-or-equal 5 microg of epinephrine was injected IV. Based on the SBP criterion (positive if greater-than-or-equal 15 mm Hg increase), however, 100% sensitivity and specificity were associated only with greater-than-or-equal 10 microg of epinephrine doses. These results suggest that the minimal effective epinephrine doses for detecting unintentional intravascular injection are 5 microg based on the HR and T-wave criteria, and 10 microg based on the SBP criterion in adult patients anesthetized with propofol and nitrous oxide. IMPLICATIONS: Accidental migration of an epidural catheter into a blood vessel is often detected by hemodynamic changes after injecting an epidural test dose containing epinephrine. Our results suggest that 5 microg of epinephrine is not adequate to reliably produce hemodynamic and T-wave alterations in adult patients during propofol anesthesia.     

Efficacy of simulated intravenous test dose in the elderly during general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Reliability of detecting unintentional intravascular injection of the epinephrine-containing test dose is improved by decreasing the heart rate (HR) threshold to 10 beats/min during combined epidural and general anesthesia. We have tested whether this modified HR criterion is still applicable in the anesthetized elderly patients. METHODS: Forty healthy elderly patients, >65 years old, undergoing upper abdominal surgeries received epidural block to T4 or higher and were anesthetized with 67% nitrous oxide and 0.5-1.1% end-tidal sevoflurane in oxygen. They were randomly assigned to either test dose group (n = 20) receiving 3 mL 1.5% lidocaine plus epinephrine 15 microg (1/200,000), or saline group (n = 20) receiving 3 mL normal saline intravenously to simulate intravascularly administered test dose during surgery. RESULTS: Intravenous test dose caused significant increases in both HR and systolic blood pressure (SBP), while no hemodynamic changes were seen in the saline group. In the test dose group, only 5 of 20 patients developed HR increases > or = 20 beats/min (conventional HR criterion), 14 developed HR increases > or = 10 beats/min (modified HR criterion), and all patients developed SBP increases > or = 15 mm Hg (conventional SBP criterion), while none of the saline group patients met these hemodynamic criteria. Therefore, sensitivity/negative predictive value based on the conventional and modified HR criteria, and the conventional SBP criterion were 25/57%, 70/77%, and 100/100%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the efficacy of the modified HR criterion using epinephrine-containing test dose is clinically applicable in most elderly patients, and the combination of the SBP and the modified HR criteria is reliable in detecting intravascular injection during combined epidural and general anesthesia.     

The efficacy of hemodynamic and T wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of epinephrine test doses in anesthetized adults: a dose-response study

Recent studies have shown that an epidural test dose containing 15 microg of epinephrine has a sensitivity and specificity of 100% for detecting intravascular injection based on the systolic blood pressure (SBP) (positive if > or =15-mm Hg increase) and the T wave criteria (positive if > or =0.1 mV and 25% decrease in amplitude), whereas the modified heart rate (HR) criterion (positive if > or =10-bpm increase) produced uncertain results in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. Because a fractional dose of the test dose may be injected intravascularly in actual clinical situations, we designed this study to determine, in a dose-related manner, the efficacy and minimum effective dose of epinephrine based on those hemodynamic and the T wave criteria. Eighty healthy adult patients were randomly assigned to one of four groups according to a simulated IV test dose under 2% end-tidal sevoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia after endotracheal intubation (n = 20 each). The saline group received 3 mL of normal saline IV; the epinephrine-15 group received 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing 15 microg of epinephrine (1); and the epinephrine-10 and -5 groups received 2 and 1 mL of the test dose of the identical components, respectively. HR, SBP, and lead II of the electrocardiograph were recorded continuously for 5 min after the IV injection of the study drug. Sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained based on the HR and the SBP criteria only if 15 microg of epinephrine was injected IV, whereas sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained based on both T wave criteria after 15 and 10 microg of epinephrine was injected IV. Two blinded observers were able to detect all T wave changes in patients who received 15, 10, and 5 microg of epinephrine IV, resulting in 100% efficacy (P: < 0.05 versus HR and SBP criteria). We conclude that minimum effective epinephrine doses for detecting accidental intravascular injection are 15 microg on the HR and the SBP criteria, and 10 microg on both T wave criteria, and that observing T wave changes may detect even smaller (5 microg) doses of epinephrine injected IV in adult patients anesthetized with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Implications: To determine whether an epidural catheter is in a blood vessel, an epidural test dose containing 15 microg of epinephrine is used. We found that a decrease in T wave amplitude appears to be more sensitive than heart rate and systolic blood pressure change for detecting accidental intravascular injection of a small dose of epinephrine-containing test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized patients.     

Isoflurane depresses baroreflex control of heart rate in decerebrate rats

BACKGROUND: Isoflurane inhibits baroreflex control of heart rate (HR) by poorly understood mechanisms. The authors examined whether suprapontine central nervous system cardiovascular regulatory sites are required for anesthetic depression. METHODS: The effects of isoflurane (1 and 2 rat minimum alveolar concentration [MAC]) on the baroreflex control of HR were determined in sham intact and midcollicular-transected decerebrate rats. Intravenous phenylephrine (0.2-12 microg/kg) and nitroprusside (1-60 microg/kg) were used to measure HR responses to peak changes in mean arterial pressure (MAP). Sigmoidal logistic curve fits to HR-MAP data assessed baroreflex sensitivity (HR/MAP), HR range, lower and upper HR plateau, and MAP at half the HR range (BP50). Four groups (two brain intact and two decerebrate) were studied before, during, and after isoflurane. To assess sympathetic and vagal contributions to HR baroreflex, beta-adrenoceptor (1 mg/kg atenolol) or muscarinic (0.5 mg/kg methyl atropine) antagonists were administered systemically. RESULTS: Decerebration did not alter resting MAP and HR or baroreflex parameters. Isoflurane depressed baroreflex slope and HR range in brain-intact and decerebrate rats. In both groups, 1 MAC reduced HR range by depressing peak reflex tachycardia. Maximal reflex bradycardia during increases in blood pressure was relatively preserved. Atenolol during 1 MAC did not alter maximum reflex tachycardia. In contrast, atropine during 1 MAC fully blocked reflex bradycardia. Therefore, 1 MAC predominantly depresses sympathetic components of HR baroreflex. Isoflurane at 2 MAC depressed both HR plateaus and decreased BP50 in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Isoflurane depresses HR baroreflex control by actions that do not require suprapontine central nervous system sites. Isoflurane actions seem to inhibit HR baroreflex primarily by the sympathetic nervous system.     

Epidural clonidine suppresses the baroreceptor-sympathetic response depending on isoflurane concentrations in cats

Epidural administration of clonidine induces hypotension and bradycardia secondary to decreased sympathetic nerve activity. In this study, we sought to elucidate the change in baroreflex response caused by epidural clonidine. Thirty-six cats were allocated to six groups (n = 6 each) and were given either thoracic epidural clonidine 4 micro g/kg or lidocaine 2 mg/kg during 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) isoflurane anesthesia. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), and cardiac sympathetic nerve activity (CSNA) were measured. Depressor and pressor responses were induced by IV nitroprusside 10 micro g/kg and phenylephrine 10 micro g/kg, respectively. Baroreflex was evaluated by the change in both CSNA and HR relative to the peak change in MAP (deltaCSNA/deltaMAP and deltaHR/deltaMAP, respectively). These measurements were performed before and 30 min after epidural drug administration. Epidural clonidine and lidocaine decreased HR, MAP, and CSNA by similar extents. deltaCSNA/deltaMAP and deltaHR/deltaMAP for depressor response were suppressed with epidural lidocaine and clonidine in all groups but the clonidine 0.5 MAC isoflurane group (0.197 +/- 0.053 to 0.063 +/- 0.014 and 0.717 +/- 0.156 to 0.177 +/- 0.038, respectively, by epidural lidocaine [P < 0.05] but 0.221 +/- 0.028 to 0.164 +/- 0.041 and 0.721 +/- 0.177 to 0.945 +/- 0.239, respectively, by epidural clonidine during 0.5 MAC isoflurane). Those for pressor response were suppressed in all groups. We conclude that thoracic epidural clonidine suppresses baroreflex gain during isoflurane anesthesia >1.0 MAC but may offer certain advantages compared with epidural lidocaine during 0.5 MAC isoflurane by virtue of preserving baroreflex sensitivity when inadvertent hypotension occurs.     

Hemodynamic Responses to Intravascular Injection of Epinephrine-containing Epidural Test Doses in Adults during General Anesthesia

Background: Epidural anesthesia is sometimes initiated during general anesthesia, yet few data exist concerning efficacy of epinephrine-containing test doses.

Methods: Thirty-six patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 MAC isoflurane, 1 MAC isoflurane, or 0.5 MAC each (1 MAC total) of isoflurane and nitrous oxide. Each subject received intravenous saline followed by three test doses containing 45 mg lidocaine with 7.5, 15, and 30 micro gram epinephrine in a randomized, double-blind fashion. Heart rate and systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressures were measured for 5 min after injection. Positive hemodynamic criteria identifying intravascular injection were determined from peak increases in hemodynamics during administration of saline. Dose-effect relationships between epinephrine and peak increases in hemodynamics were assessed with linear regression. Minimum required doses of epinephrine to produce peak positive hemodynamic increases on average were determined from linear regression.

Results: Positive hemodynamic criteria were identified as increases in heart rate greater or equal to 8 beats/min, systolic blood pressure greater or equal to 13 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure greater or equal to 7 mmHg, and mean blood pressure greater or equal to 9 mmHg. Significant dose-effect relationships were observed for epinephrine and peak increases in hemodynamics (correlation coefficients ranged from 0.61-0.91). Minimum required doses of epinephrine ranged from 6 to 19 micro gram depending on hemodynamic measurement and anesthetic group.     

The efficacy of a simulated intravascular test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized children: a dose-response study.

A recent study demonstrated that changes in both heart rate (HR; positive if > or = 10bpm increase) and T-wave amplitude (positive if > or = 25% increase) reliably detect accidental intravascular injection when a full test dose containing epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg is injected intravascularly. We designed this study to prospectively determine whether a smaller dose of epinephrine would produce reliable HR and T-wave changes in sevoflurane-anesthetized children. We studied 80 ASA physical status I infants and children (6-72 mo) undergoing elective surgeries during 1.0 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration sevoflurane and 67% nitrous oxide in oxygen. After the administration of i.v. atropine 0.01 mg/kg, the patients were randomly assigned to receive either i.v. saline (n = 20), an i.v. test dose (0.1 mL/kg) consisting of 1% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg group, n = 20), an i.v. test dose (0.05 mL/kg) (epinephrine 0.25 microg/kg group, n = 20), or an i.v. test dose (0.025 mL/kg) (epinephrine 0.125 microg/kg group, n = 20) via a peripheral vein to simulate the intravascular injection of the test dose. HR and systolic blood pressure were recorded every 20 and 30 s, respectively, and T-wave amplitude of lead II was continuously recorded for subsequent analysis. After the i.v. injection of the test dose, all children in the epinephrine 0.5 and 0.25 microg/kg groups developed positive responses based on the peak T-wave amplitude, whereas all children in the epinephrine 0.5 microg/kg group and 17 children (85%) in the epinephrine 0.25 microg/kg group elicited a positive response according to the peak HR criterion. No false-positive responses were observed with saline injections. Children in the epinephrine 0.125 microg/kg group showed clinically unacceptable efficacy based on either criterion. We conclude that the efficacies of detecting an intravascular injection of the test dose based on the hemodynamic and T-wave criteria are reduced with smaller doses of epinephrine and that HR and T-wave changes are still useful indicators in most patients if epinephrine 0.25 microg/kg is accidentally injected intravascularly. IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidurally administered local anesthetic has been unintentionally injected into a blood vessel, a small dose of epinephrine is often added to a local anesthetic. We found that an increase in T-wave amplitude > or = 25% in lead II and a heart rate increase > or = 10 bpm are useful indicators for detecting the accidental intravascular injection of a small dose of epinephrine in sevoflurane-anesthetized children.     

The effects of intravenous lidocaine administration on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane in cats

Lidocaine decreases the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of inhaled anesthetics and has been used clinically to reduce the requirements for other anesthetic drugs. In this study we examined the effects of lidocaine on isoflurane MAC in cats. Six cats were studied. In Experiment 1, the MAC of isoflurane was determined. An IV bolus of lidocaine 2 mg/kg was then administrated and venous plasma lidocaine concentrations were measured to determine pharmacokinetic values. In Experiment 2, lidocaine was administered to achieve target plasma concentrations between 1 and 11 microg/mL and the MAC of isoflurane was determined at each lidocaine plasma concentration. Actual lidocaine plasma concentrations were 1.06 +/- 0.12, 2.83 +/- 0.39, 4.93 +/- 0.64, 6.86 +/- 0.97, 8.86 +/- 2.10, and 9.84 +/- 1.34 microg/mL for the target concentrations of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 microg/mL, respectively. The MAC of isoflurane in this study was 2.21% +/- 0.17%, 2.14% +/- 0.14%, 1.88% +/- 0.18%, 1.66% +/- 0.16%, 1.47% +/- 0.13%, 1.33% +/- 0.23%, and 1.06% +/- 0.19% at lidocaine target plasma concentrations of 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 microg/mL, respectively. Lidocaine, at target plasma concentrations of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11 microg/mL, linearly decreased isoflurane MAC by -6% to 6%, 7% to 28%, 19% to 35%, 28% to 45%, 29% to 53%, and 44% to 59%, respectively. We conclude that lidocaine decreases the MAC of isoflurane.     

A comparative study of hemodynamic and T-wave criteria for detecting intravascular injection of the test dose (epinephrine) in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults.

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and changes in T-wave morphology in detecting intravascular injection of 15 microg of epinephrine (test dose) in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. In addition, the testing threshold using the T-wave amplitude was derived. Ninety-six healthy patients were randomized to receive end-tidal sevoflurane 0.5%, 1%, or 2% and nitrous oxide 67% in oxygen (n = 32 for each sevoflurane concentration). Each group of patients was further randomized to receive 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine plus 15 microg of epinephrine IV or 3 mL of saline IV (n = 16 each). HR, SBP, and T-wave amplitude were continuously monitored for 5 min after the IV injection of the study drug. None receiving IV saline and 15,15, and 14 patients receiving the IV test dose developed HR increases > or =10 bpm during 0.5%, 1%, and 2% sevoflurane, respectively. No patient receiving saline and all patients receiving the test dose developed SBP increases > or =15 mm Hg. T-wave amplitude decreased by >0.1 mV and by >25% in all patients receiving the IV test dose, and its magnitude was similar regardless of the sevoflurane concentrations. When 0.1-mV and 25% decreases in T-wave amplitude were considered as testing thresholds, 100% sensitivities and specificities were obtained. We conclude that a peak SBP increase > or =15 mm Hg and a decrease in T-wave amplitude > or =0.1 mV and > or =25% are more reliable than a HR increase > or =10 bpm for detecting intravascular injection of epinephrine-containing test dose during sevoflurane anesthesia. IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidural catheter resides in a blood vessel, a standard test dose containing a local anesthetic and 15 microg of epinephrine is used. We found that, in sevoflurane-anesthetized adult patients, a systolic blood pressure increase > or =15 mm Hg and a decrease in T-wave amplitude > or =0.1 mV and > or =25% in lead II, but not a heart rate increase > or =10 bpm, are reliable indicators for detecting intravascular injection.     

Hormonal and haemodynamic responses to upper abdominal surgery during isoflurane and balanced anaesthesia

The purpose of the study was to compare the protective role of different anaesthetic techniques against surgical stress. Sixty patients undergoing elective laparotomy were randomly divided into six groups of ten patients each: Group I was given 0.65 MAC nitrous oxide (66 per cent inspired) and 0.65 MAC isoflurane (0.75 per cent end-expired); Group II was given 0.65 MAC nitrous oxide and 1-1.2 MAC isoflurane (1.2-1.4 per cent end-expired); Group III was given the same anaesthetic management as patients in Group I but with the addition of fentanyl (2 micrograms X kg-1) before the skin incision and 1/8 of the initial dose every 15 minutes during surgery; Group IV was treated as patients in Group I with an additional infusion of lidocaine (30 micrograms X kg-1 X min-1); Groups V and VI were given 0.65 MAC of nitrous oxide and fentanyl, 7.5 and 15 micrograms X kg-1, respectively, before skin incision with 1/8 of the initial dose every 15 minutes during the operation; diazepam, 5 mg IV each hour of surgery, was given to prevent intraoperative awareness. Cortisol concentration was determined by radioimmunoassay method and catecholamines were measured by high performance liquid gas chromatography in blood samples taken at different stages perioperatively. All patients had satisfactory haemodynamic courses of anaesthesia. Statistically significant increases in both epinephrine and norepinephrine concentrations were observed during the immediate postoperative period in Group I patients only. Haemodynamic stability was maintained despite a two- to three-fold increase in cortisol which occurred during the operation and immediate postoperative period.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of oral clonidine premedication on the heart rate response to intravenous atropine during propofol anesthesia

BACKGROUND: Propofol induces suppression of the sympathetic nervous activity, and attenuates the heart rate responses to intravenous atropine. Similarly, clonidine suppresses the heart rate response to intravenous atropine under awake and enflurane-anesthetized patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate effects of clonidine on the heart rate response to atropine under propofol anesthesia. METHODS: Thirty-two adults patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Clonidine group (n=16) patients received oral clonidine 5 microg x kg(-1) and famotidine 20 mg, and the control group (n=16) patients received oral famotidine alone 90 minutes before anesthesia. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with propofol at the effect site concentration of 3 microg x ml(-1) in air and oxygen using the TCI system. All patients received incremental doses of IV atropine 5 microg x kg(-1) over 5 s at 2-min intervals until heart rate increased > 20 beats x min(-1) from baseline values or until atropine 40 microg x kg(-1) was given. RESULTS: Although heart rate response to atropine 5-25 microg kg(-1) was similar between the two groups, heart rate response to atropine 30 microg x kg(-1) in the clonidine group was smaller than that in the control group (P<0.05). When the atropine 40 microg x kg(-1) was administered, heart rate increased > 20 beats x min(-1) in all patients of the control group, but 62.5% of patients in the clonidine group (P< 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Oral clonidine premedication attenuates the heart rate responses to IV atropine under propofol anesthesia.     

The efficacy of simulated intravascular test dose in sedated patients.

Sedation usually decreases the reliability of subjectively detecting an intravascular test dose, but the efficacies of objective hemodynamic and T-wave criteria remain undetermined. Sixty healthy patients were randomly assigned to receive IV midazolam in 1-mg increments until they were lightly sedated, fentanyl 2 microg/kg followed by incremental midazolam until they were similarly sedated, or no sedative (n = 20 each). Then, normal saline 3 mL was administered IV, followed 4 min later by 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL plus epinephrine 15 microg (1:200,000) in all subjects. Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP) measured by a radial arterial catheter, and lead II of the electrocardiogram were continuously recorded for 4 min after the saline and test dose injections. An IV test dose produced significant increases in HR and SBP and decreases in T-wave amplitude in all subjects. However, the mean maximum increase in HR in patients sedated with midazolam plus fentanyl (31 +/- 14 bpm [mean +/- SD]) was significantly less than in those administered midazolam alone or no sedative (42 +/- 12 and 44 +/- 10 bpm, respectively; P < 0.05). A sensitivity of 100% was obtained on the basis of the traditional HR criterion (positive if > or =20 bpm increase) in patients sedated with midazolam or no sedative, but it was 70% in those with midazolam plus fentanyl (P < 0.05 versus the other two groups). Irrespective of the treatment, sensitivities and specificities of 100% were obtained according to the SBP (positive if > or =15 mm Hg increase) and T-wave (positive if > or =25% decrease in amplitude) criteria. An increase in SBP and a decrease in T-wave amplitude are more reliable than an HR response for detecting accidental intravascular injection of the epinephrine-containing test dose in subjects sedated with midazolam and fentanyl. IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidural catheter is in a blood vessel, an epidural test dose containing 15 microg epinephrine is used. We found that an increase in systolic blood pressure and a decrease in T-wave amplitude seem to be more reliable than a heart rate change for detecting inadvertent intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing test dose in patients sedated with midazolam and fentanyl.     

Intravenous lidocaine and ephedrine, but not propofol, suppress fentanyl-induced cough

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lidocaine, propofol and ephedrine in suppressing fentanyl-induced cough. METHODS: One hundred and eighteen patients were randomly assigned into four groups and the following medications were given intravenously: patients in Group I (n = 31) received normal saline 2 mL, Group II (n = 29) received lidocaine 2 mg.kg(-1), Group III (n = 30) received propofol 0.6 mg.kg(-1) and Group IV (n = 28) received ephedrine 5 mg. At one minute after the study medication, fentanyl 2.5 microg.kg(-1) was given intravenously within two seconds. The occurrence of cough and vital sign profiles were recorded within two minutes after fentanyl bolus by an anesthesiologist blinded to study design. RESULTS: Sixty-five percent of patients in the placebo group had cough, whereas the frequency was significantly decreased in Groups II (14%) and IV (21%). Although a numerically lower frequency of cough was noted in Group III (37%), it was not statistically different from that of the placebo group. SpO(2) decreased significantly in patients of Group III compared to placebo; one patient experienced hypoxemia necessitating mask ventilation. Patients in Group III showed a decrease in heart rate and systolic blood pressure (2 beats.min(-1) and 8 mmHg vs baseline). Patients in Group IV showed an increase in both measurements (5 beats.min(-1) and 8 mmHg vs baseline). No truncal rigidity was observed throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous lidocaine 2 mg.kg(-1) or ephedrine 5 mg, but not propofol 0.6 mg.kg(-1), was effective in preventing fentanyl-induced cough. The results provide a convenient method to decrease fentanyl-induced cough.     

Effects of Oral Clonidine on Heart Rate Changes after Neostigmine-Atropine Administration

Background: Clonidine reduces heart rate (HR) responses to atropine, whereas neostigmine causes bradycardia. This study was designed to determine whether clonidine premedication would reduce tachycardia after neostigmine-atropine administration.

Methods: Fifty adult patients without cardiovascular disorders who were schedule for elective surgeries were randomly assigned to receive approximately 5 [micro sign]g/kg (oral clonidine clonidine group, n = 25) or no clonidine (control group, n = 25) 90 min before induction of general anesthesia. After tracheal intubation, anesthesia was maintained with N2 O and 1-2% isoflurane in oxygen while patients were paralyzed with vecuronium and mechanically ventilated. When surgeries were completed, adequate spontaneous respiration, responses to verbal commands, and sustained tetanus by stimulating the ulnar nerve were confirmed, and patients' tracheas were extubated. Then a mixture of 0.05 mg/kg neostigmine and 0.02 mg/kg atropine was administered intravenously over 20 s under stable hemodynamic condition (systolic blood pressure and HR within +/- 5% of preceding values), and blood pressure and HR were measured noninvasively at 1-min intervals for 10 min.

Results: Increases in HR in the clonidine group were significantly less 1-4 min after neostigmine-atropine injections compared with HR values in the control group. A maximum increase in HR of the clonidine group was also significantly less than the control group (15 +/- 7 vs. 23 +/- 10 beats/min; means +/- SD), whereas absolute values of mean blood pressure were similar. Severe bradycardia (HR < 50 beats/min) developed in no patients in either group.     

Digital skin blood flow as an indicator for intravascular injection of epinephrine-containing simulated epidural test dose in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults

I designed this study to determine the efficacy of heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and digital skin blood flow (DSBF) in detecting intravascular injection after a simulated epidural test dose containing 15 mug of epinephrine in sevoflurane-anesthetized adults. In addition, the testing threshold using DSBF was derived. Eighty patients were randomized to receive either 0.5 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC) sevoflurane or 1.0 MAC sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in oxygen (n = 40 for each sevoflurane concentration). Each group of patients was further randomized to receive either 3 mL of 1.5% lidocaine containing 15 mug of epinephrine IV or 3 mL of saline IV (n = 20 each). HR, SBP, and DSBF were monitored for 5 min after injection. By using the HR (positive if >or=10 bpm increase) and SBP (positive if >or=15 mm Hg increase) criteria, a positive response rate to epinephrine was 95% for both variables during 0.5 MAC and 90% during 1.0 MAC sevoflurane anesthesia. Injection of the test dose resulted in peak DSBF decrease by 87% +/- 8% and 81% +/- 12% at 52 +/- 10 and 53 +/- 13 s in the sevoflurane 0.5 and 1.0 MAC groups, respectively. Positive DSBF criterion, as determined from peak increases during saline administration, was a decrease in DSBF >or=15%. Using this value, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 100% in both sevoflurane groups. In conclusion, DSBF was superior to conventional hemodynamic criteria for detection of an intravascular injection of epidural test dose. IMPLICATIONS: This study examined the efficacy of digital skin blood flow to detect an intravascular injection of an epinephrine-containing epidural test dose. This new variable when measured with a laser Doppler flowmeter was superior to conventional hemodynamic criteria during sevoflurane anesthesia.     

Halothane,isoflurane, and fentanyl increase the minimally effective defibrillation threshold of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: first report in humans

Placing an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) involves the induction of ventricular fibrillation, whereupon the minimally effective defibrillation energy threshold (DFT) is determined. We evaluated the effects of 0.7% halothane, 1% isoflurane, or 1.5 micro g/kg of IV fentanyl during N(2)O/oxygen-based general anesthesia (GA) or those of subcutaneous 1.5% lidocaine plus IV 0.35 mg/kg of propofol on the DFT during ICD implantation in humans (n = 20 per group). Thirty minutes after the first set of DFT measurements under such conditions, the inhaled anesthetics were withdrawn, and all three GA groups received fentanyl 1 microg/kg IV (second set). A third set was taken 30 min later, before the GA patients awakened and when only N(2)O/oxygen was delivered for GA. The lidocaine plus propofol patients were given the same IV propofol bolus 1 min before each fibrillation/defibrillation trial and at the same time points as the three GA groups. The first DFTs were 16.1 +/- 2.2 J (halothane), 17.7 +/- 2.7 J (isoflurane), 16.4 +/- 2.9 J (fentanyl), and 12.9 +/- 3.8 J (lidocaine plus propofol) (P = 0.01). The second set of DFTs were significantly lower than the first sets for the halothane (P = 0.01) and isoflurane (P = 0.02), but not the fentanyl or lidocaine plus propofol, regimens. The third DFTs were significantly (P < 0.01) lower than the first ones for the three GA groups, but not for the lidocaine plus propofol patients. Thus, halothane, isoflurane, and fentanyl increased DFT values during ICD implantation in humans, whereas lidocaine plus intermittent small-dose IV propofol minimized these thresholds. IMPLICATIONS: Halothane, isoflurane, and IV fentanyl added to N(2)O/oxygen-based general anesthesia similarly increase minimal defibrillation threshold energy requirements (DFT) during cardioverter defibrillator implantation in humans. Subcutaneous lidocaine plus intermittent small-dose IV propofol minimizes DFT compared with these general anesthetics while providing equal patient satisfaction.     

Aging reduces the efficacy of the simulated epidural test dose in anesthetized adults

Aging is associated with reduced beta-adrenergic responsiveness. However, the age-related effects on hemodynamic changes and effectiveness of a simulated epidural IV test dose have not been defined during general anesthesia. We studied 20 (140 total) consecutive patients (ASA physical status I) assigned in each of the following age groups after endotracheal intubation and during stable end-tidal sevoflurane 2% and 67% nitrous oxide anesthesia (in yr): 10s, 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s. Each group first received normal saline 3 mL IV, followed 4 min later by 1.5% lidocaine 3 mL plus 15 microg epinephrine (1:200,000) IV for 5 s. Heart rate (HR) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) were continuously monitored for 4 min after saline administration and the test dose injections. None receiving IV saline and all patients receiving IV test dose in age groups 10s to 50s developed HR increases > or = 10 bpm, whereas 17 and 13 patients met this HR criterion in age groups 60s and 70s (85% and 65% sensitivities), respectively. There was a significant inverse correlation between the maximum HR increase and the age (P: < 0.001 by Spearman's rank correlation). However, none receiving saline and all patients receiving IV test dose in all age groups developed SBP increases of 15 mm Hg, resulting in 100% efficacy based on the SBP criterion. We conclude that during stable sevoflurane anesthesia administration (a) the efficacy based on the HR criterion for detecting accidental intravascular injection of the epidural test dose is age-dependent, (b) the HR criterion may be clinically applicable only in patients <60 yr of age, and (c) the SBP criterion is effective for all age groups studied. IMPLICATIONS: To determine whether an epidurally administered local anesthetic has been unintentionally injected into a blood vessel, a small dose of epinephrine is often added to a local anesthetic. We found that an increase in systolic blood pressure > or = 15 mm Hg is a more useful indicator than an increase in heart rate > or = 10 bpm in the patients > or = 60 yr old during stable sevoflurane anesthesia administration.