Esomeprazole-based therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

AIM: To perform a systematic review on the efficacy of esomeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of esomeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Studies evaluating esomeprazole plus antibiotics were considered. Only randomised trials comparing esomeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors with antibiotics, and differing only in the proton pump inhibitor, were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographical searches were conducted. The percentage (weighted mean) of eradication success was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed combining the odd ratios of the individual studies. RESULTS: Mean cure rates with dual regimens (esomeprazole plus clarithromycin) were 51 and 54%, respectively, by intention-to-treat and by per-protocol. Corresponding figures with triple regimens (esomeprazole plus clarithromycin and either amoxicillin or metronidazole) were 82% (intention-to-treat) and 86% (per-protocol). Four studies were included in the meta-analysis: mean H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat) with esomeprazole plus antibiotics was 85 and 82% when omeprazole was used (odds ratio = 1.19; 95% confidence interval = 0.81-1.74), results being statistically homogeneous. When subanalysis included only high quality studies, the odds ratio for this comparison was closer to one (1.08; 95% confidence interval = 0.4-1.47) and results were more homogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: Esomeprazole-based triple therapy is highly effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection and offers comparable efficacy to omeprazole-based therapy.     

Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin for Helicobacter pylori eradication: A randomised, multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapies is decreasing. Recently, lactoferrin administration has been shown to significantly increase the cure rate of 7-day rabeprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole triple therapy. We assessed whether lactoferrin also increases the eradication rate of 7-day esomeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin triple therapy as first-line treatment. METHODS: Overall, 133 consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomised to receive either a standard 7-day triple therapy with esomeprazole 20mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d. and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (68 patients) or a quadruple therapy comprising of the same regimen plus lactoferrin 200mg b.i.d. (65 patients). H. pylori at entry was assessed by endoscopy, while bacterial eradication was checked by (13)C urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication following standard triple therapy was achieved in 53/68 (77.9%; 95% CI = 68-88) and in 53/66 (80.3%; 95% CI = 71-89) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 50/65 (76.9%; 95% CI = 67-87) and 50/64 (78.1%; 95% CI = 68-88) patients at ITT and PP analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapeutic regimens, both at ITT (p = 0.9) and PP analyses (p = 0.9). Side effects were complained by seven (10.3%) patients and six (9.2%) patients following the triple and quadruple regimens, respectively (p = 0.9), with only one patient in the quadruple group interrupting the treatment due to side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Quadruple therapy with lactoferrin did not significantly increase the H. pylori cure rate of standard 7-day clarithromycin-amoxycillin based triple therapy in non-ulcer dyspepsia patients.     

Two new treatment regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a randomised study

BACKGROUND: Several studies have found a fairly low Helicobacter pylori eradication rate using a standard 7-day triple therapy in Italy. Recently, two new therapeutic schedules have been proposed with an eradication rate higher than 90%. This study compared the efficacy of these two treatment regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 131 patients with Helicobacter pylori infection and either non-ulcer dyspepsia (73 patients] or peptic ulcer (58 patients) were enrolled. Helicobacter pylori infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology on gastric biopsies. Patients were randomised to receive either a 5-day course of ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 bid, and tinidazole 500 bid, or a 10-day course of omeprazole 20 mg bid plus amoxycillin 1 g bid for the first 5 days, and omeprazole 20 mg bid, clarithromycin 500 mg bid and tinidazole 500 mg bid for the remaining 5 days. Eradication was assessed by endoscopy 4-6 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: Overall, 4 patients (2 for each treatment group) were lost to follow-up. Helicobacter pylori eradication rates were 67.2% (95% confidence interval: 55.7-78.7) and 65.2% (95% confidence interval: 53.7-76.6) at per protocol and intention-to-treat analyses, respectively, after the 5-day regimen, and 96.8% (95% confidence interval: 92.5-100) and 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 88-99.7) after the 10-day regimen (p<0.05). Both treatments were well tolerated, and no major side-effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-day regimen gave disappointing results, while the eradication rate after the 10-day regimen was very high.     

Comparable Helicobacter pylori eradication rates obtained with 4- and 7-day rabeprazole-based triple therapy: a preliminary study

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor, which has been reported to induce a faster acid suppression than other drugs of the same category. This might be useful to reduce the duration of anti-Helicobacter therapies. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess whether there is the possibility of shortening a rabeprazole-based triple therapy from 7 to 4 days without compromising its efficacy in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. PATIENTS: A total of 128 consecutive dyspeptic patients with H. pylori infection were recruited for this controlled, randomized, open and parallel-group trial comparing the efficacy of two durations of the same rabeprazole-based triple therapy. METHODS: All patients were subdivided to receive a combination of rabeprazole 20 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (RCM) for 4 days (n = 63) and for 7 days (n = 65). At baseline, they underwent breath 13C-urea test and endoscopy with biopsies for rapid urease testing and histology to confirm infection with H. pylori. Eradication was determined by a negative 13C-urea breath test within 28-32 days after the end of therapy. RESULTS: Overall eradication rates were similar for patients treated with the 4- and the 7-day periods (intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses showed a success rate of 81% versus 78% and 88% versus 85%, respectively; P = NS). Tolerance was similar in both groups. Most adverse events were mild to moderate, and only two patients were withdrawn because of them. CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate of the 4-day regimen was equivalent to that of the same 7-day regimen based on rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and metronidazole. Therefore, the 4-day regimen of RCM seems to give us the possibility of adopting a shorter-than-usual duration of therapy against H. pylori.     

Dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori infection: a prospective multicentre observational study

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia still represents an unsolved clinical enigma. AIM: The aims of this study were to determine whether symptoms and Helicobacter pylori infection are predictors of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia, and if H. pylori eradication improves symptoms in functional dyspepsia. METHODS: An observational study was performed on outpatients with uninvestigated dyspepsia. Symptoms were scored and H. pylori status determined. Patients with functional dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomly given either a standard eradicating treatment or a 1-month course of empirical treatment. The latter was also given to functional dyspeptic patients without infection. Symptoms were re-assessed in functional dyspeptic patients at 2- and 6-month follow-up visits. Patients receiving eradicating treatment were re-tested for H. pylori at the 2 month visit. RESULTS: A total of 860 patients were studied and 605 (70.3%) were affected by functional dyspepsia. H. pylori infection was diagnosed in 71.8% of patients with organic dyspepsia and in 65.0% with functional dyspepsia (p=0.053). Male sex, anaemia, smoking habit, age over 45 years, and severe epigastric pain, but not H. pylori infection, were independent predictors of organic disease. Symptoms significantly improved in most functional dyspeptic patients regardless of their H. pylori status and type of treatment. CONCLUSION: H. pylori infection is not a strong predictor of organic disease in uninvestigated dyspepsia. H. pylori eradication is not essential to improve symptoms in functional dyspepsia.     

Levofloxacin based triple therapy as a second-line treatment after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication with standard triple therapy

BACKGROUND: Successful eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapy is difficult. The efficacy and safety of levofloxacin based triple therapy as a first-line therapy has-been studied. AIMS: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levofloxacin based therapy after a failed standard triple therapy. PATIENTS: We conducted a prospective, uncontrolled study of a consecutive series of 33 patients who failed eradication with 1 week of lansoprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin triple therapy. METHODS: The subjects were retreated with 1 week of LA-LVFX triple therapy (lansoprazole, 30 mg twice daily; amoxicillin, 1000 mg twice daily: levofloxacin, 200 mg twice daily). Cure of infection was defined as negative results from culture, histology and a urea breath test 4 to 8 weeks after the second-line therapy. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 69.7% (23/33) by both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses (95% confidence interval=61-79%). Seven (21.2%) patients experienced mild side-effects, such as soft stools and taste disturbance. No patient stopped the medication on account of adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Levofloxacin based triple therapy is an effective second-line treatment after a failed standard triple therapy.     

A third-line levofloxacin-based rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection persists in a considerable proportion of patients after both first- and second-line current treatments. A standard therapy for re-treatment in such refractory patients is still lacking. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin combination in patients who previously failed two or more therapeutic attempts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with persistent Helicobacter pylori infection were enrolled. Bacterial infection was assessed by rapid urease test and histology on gastric biopsies at endoscopy. Patients were assigned to receive a 10-day triple therapy, comprising rabeprazole 20 mg b.d., levofloxacin 250 mg b.d., and amoxycillin 1 g b.d. Four to 6 weeks after therapy, Helicobacter pylori eradication was assessed by a further endoscopy or 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: Overall, 36 patients were enrolled, but two patients were lost to follow-up. Helicobacter pylori was successfully cured in 30 patients, giving an 83.3% (95% CI=71.2-95.5) and 88.2% (95% CI=77.4-99) eradication rate at intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. Compliance was good in all but two patients, who discontinued the treatment at 8 and 6 days, respectively, on account of glossitis. No major side-effects were reported, whilst 7 (20.1%) patients complained of mild side-effects. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that a 10-day levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy is a safe and successful third-line therapeutic approach for Helicobacter pylori eradication.     

Thrombocytopenic purpura: an unusual complication of eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori

A case of severe thrombocytopenic purpura is described in a 56-year-old female following Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy consisting of omeprazole, clarithromycin and amoxycillin. The pathogenesis of this patient's thrombocytopenia appears to be quite complex. Whilst it was clearly triggered by antibiotic treatment, a direct toxic mechanism does not provide an adequate explanation for the severity and lack of responsiveness to drug treatment. It is tempting to suggest that an immunological mechanism and splenomegaly were also involved.     

Helicobacter pylori is not a risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy

Background. Helicobacter pylori infection has been described as a risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy in patients with chronic liver disease although the topic remains controversial.Aims. To determine whether Helicobacter pylori infection is an independent predictive factor for encephalopathy in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods. Clinical, epidemiological, analytical and nutritional parameters of 205 patients were collected. Helicobacter pylori infection was determined by serology. Encephalopathy (grade 11 or higher) was clinically assessed during follow-up. The relationship between each parameter and encephalopathy was analysed by Kaplan-Meier curves and the Log rank test. The most significant parameters underwent multivariate analysis by Cox regression.Results. Twenty-five variables were related to encephalopathy in the bivariate analysis. Multivariate analysis selected five independent factors: previous bouts of encephalopathy (Odds ratio 3.79; 95% confidence interval 1.94–7.38), albumin (Odds ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.80–0.92), tricipital skin fold (Odds ratio 0.79; 95% confidence interval 0.66–0.95] chronic pulmonary disease (Odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval; 1.31–5.92), and on-going alcoholism (Odds ratio 2.62; 95% confidence interval 1.16-5.88].Conclusions. Helicobacter pylori is not an independent risk factor for hepatic encephalopathy.     

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori re-treatment: Role of bacterial resistance

BACKGROUND: First-line Helicobacter pylori therapy fails in more than 20% of patients. Quadruple therapy is the suggested second-line therapy, but bismuth salts are not anymore available worldwide. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a levofloxacin-amoxycillin triple therapy as a second-line treatment, and the role of primary levofloxacin resistance. METHODS: Forty patients, in whom first treatment with either standard 10-day triple or sequential therapy had failed, received 10-day triple therapy with rabeprazole (20mg b.d.), levofloxacin (250mg b.d.), and amoxycillin (1g b.d.). Cure rates were evaluated by the (13)C-urea breath test. Primary levofloxacin resistance was detected by culture. RESULTS: Bacterial culture was available in 33 (82.5%) out 40 patients, and primary levofloxacin resistance was detected in 10 (30.3%) patients. Overall, 33 of 40 patients accepted to participate in this study, and all returned for follow-up after therapy. Compliance to the therapy was safe except 1 patient only who stopped earlier the treatment due to side effects (oral candidiasis). H. pylori infection was eradicated in 24 patients, accounting for a 72.7% (95% CI: 57-88) eradication rate at both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. The eradication rate was higher in patients harbouring levofloxacin-susceptible than resistant strains (75% versus 33.3%; P=0.074). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rate achieved by a levofloxacin-based re-treatment seems to be decreasing, and its efficacy is reduced in presence of levofloxacin resistance.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication with either quadruple regimen with lactoferrin or levofloxacin-based triple therapy: A multicentre study

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rate following standard triple therapy is decreasing worldwide. A quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a levofloxacin-based triple therapy has been found to achieve a very high (>90%) cure rate. This study aimed to confirm these encouraging results. METHODS: This was a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre, Italian study enrolling consecutive H. pylori infected patients. The infection at entry was assessed by endoscopy and biopsies (histology plus rapid urease test) in all patients, whilst bacterial eradication was assessed by 13C-urea breath test 4-6 weeks after therapy ended. Patients were randomised to receive either a 7-day, triple therapy with rabeprazole 20mg o.d., levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., and amoxycillin 1g b.i.d. (4 tablets/day) or a 7-day quadruple therapy comprising of rabeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, tinidazole 500 mg plus bovine lactoferrin 200mg, all given twice daily (10 tablets/day). RESULTS: Overall, 144 consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. Following the triple therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 49 out of 72 (68.1%; 95% CI=57-79) patients and in 49 out of 71 (69.1%; 95% CI=58-80) at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. Following the quadruple regimen, the infection was cured in 52 out of 72 (72.2%; 95% CI=62-83) and in 52 out of 68 (76.5; 95% CI=66-87) patients at intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses, respectively. No statistically significant difference emerged between the two therapy regimens. CONCLUSIONS: H. pylori eradication rate following both quadruple therapy with lactoferrin and a low-dose PPI, triple therapy with levofloxacin is disappointingly low.     

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. indications and regimens: an update

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection is still surrounded by controversy and uncertainties. Indications and correct application of current regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection are still considered a matter of debate. Regarding indications, only peptic ulcer and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma are considered clear indications for treatment. In other conditions, such as atrophic gastritis, post gastric cancer resection, first-degree relatives of gastric cancer patients, dyspeptic patients, patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users, the value of Helicobacter pylori eradication is still controversial. The regimens for first-line and second-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection have been recommended by the Maastricht 2 Consensus Report. Although all the treatments are considered to be effective, physicians still do not agree on what first-line regimen should be used. Furthermore, a consensus on the duration of the antibiotic treatment is still lacking, although Maastricht guidelines for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection recommend a one-week therapy. Also regimens, as a third-line treatment, and methods to improve compliance and clinical outcome are still a matter of debate. All these points will be considered in the present review.     

Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection: for-year follow-up study

Background. About 10% of duodenal ulcer patients are characterized by gastric acid hypersecretion with normal gastrin values. Relapsing duodenal ulcer after Helicobacter pylori cure has been related to high acid output and maintenance antisecretory therapy has been suggested in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients. The role of Helicobacter pylori infection and the effects of Helicobacter pylori cure in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients still remain to be fully studied.Aim. To study: a) whether gastric acid hypersecretion “per se” is a risk factor for duodenal ulcer recurrence; b) whether maintenance antisecretory therapy is necessary after eradication in hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients.Patients. The study population comprised 8 hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients, selected from a population of 79 Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcer patients.Methods. Hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients were followed-up for at least 4 years after eradication. Gastric acid secretion was measured again 12 months after Helicobacter pylori eradication. Gastroscopy with histology was performed 3, 6, 12 and 36 months after treatment, ¹³C-urea breath test after 42 months; clinical questionnaires were completed every 6 months.Results. After eradication, despite a not significantly reduced high acid output (median value of basal acid output and pentagastrin-stimulated acid output, respectively, 23.1 mEg/h and 64. 1 mEg/h before treatment vs 16 mEg/h and 49.7 mEq/h 12 months after treatment), all patients were free from symptoms, none of them had duodenal ulcer relapse or complications (7/8 before treatment), or needed antisecretory maintenance therapy, except for one patient taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.Conclusions. These findings, obtained in a selected population of hypersecretory duodenal ulcer patients with long-term follow-up, suggest that after successful Helicobacter pylori eradication gastric acid hypersecretion “per se” is not able to determine the recurrence of duodenal ulcer.     

Discrepancy between Helicobacter pylori stool antigen assay and urea breath test in the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection

Background. The reference diagnostic methods available for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection are either invasive (histology) or expensive and highly sophisticated (Urea Breath Test). A new enzyme immunoassay, which can be easily performed in any laboratory, has been developed to detect Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens (HpSA - Meridian Diagnostics, Cincinnati, USA). Aim of the study was to compare HpSA to Urea Breath Test.Patients and methods. A total of 125 patients (52 never treated for Helicobacter pylori infection and 73 after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy) referring to our Department, underwent both tests within two weeks.Results. Contrasting results between the two tests were found in 30% of cases: in 19% of the untreated patients and in 37% of the treated patients (p<0.001). The main discrepancy consisted in positive HpSA associated with negative Urea Breath Test. Mean HpSA value in such conditions was 0.273 optical density, while in patients with both positive tests, it was 1.192 optical density. In untreated, but not in treated patients, raising the HpSA cut off value significantly decreased the percentage of conflicting results.Conclusions. Some disagreement was detected between HpSA and Urea Breath Test results, especially in treated patients. Possible explanations for our findings are a low HpSA cut off value together with the identification of Helicobacter pylori coccoid forms by the immunoassay but not by the urease based Urea Breath Test. The higher percentage of discrepancy detected in treated patients might support this hypothesis.     

One-week once-daily triple therapy with esomeprazole, levofloxacin and azithromycin compared to a standard therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Primary antibiotic-resistance and poor compliance are the main causes of Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of standard regimens. AIM: To investigate eradication rate, patient compliance and tolerability of a 1-week once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin triple therapy versus the standard twice-daily triple therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 164 H. pylori-positive patients were randomised to either esomeprazole 20mg, levofloxacin 500 mg and azithromycin 500 mg once-daily (ELAz) or esomeprazole 20mg, clarithromycin 500 mg and amoxycillin 1g twice-daily (ECA) for 1 week. H. pylori infection was defined at entry by histology and urea breath test; cure of infection was determined both by negative urea breath test and H. pylori stool antigens. RESULTS: H. pylori eradication rates of ELAz and ECA were similar at intention-to-treat (both 65%) and per-protocol analyses (70% versus 76%, respectively). Incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly, in patients randomised to ELAz than to ECA (4% versus 10%); tolerability was significantly higher for ELAz than for ECA (88% versus 70%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily levofloxacin plus azithromycin-based triple therapy achieves an H. pylori eradication rate comparable to that of standard twice-daily triple therapy, but is associated with higher patient compliance and might even be better tolerated.     

Cell kinetic balance in gastric mucosa with intestinal metaplasia after Helicobacter pylori eradication: 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND: Proliferation and apoptosis events are altered in Helicobacter pylori infection. However, whether H. pylori eradication has an effect on the disturbed kinetics in metaplastic mucosa has not been well elucidated. AIM: To investigate the effect of eradication on the gastric cell kinetics. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Initially, biopsies were obtained from 74 H. pylori-infected subjects and repeated 12 and 24 months after eradication. Biopsies were immunohistochemically stained for apoptosis by single-stranded DNA, for proliferation by Ki-67 antibodies and for intestinal metaplasia MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6 and CD10. RESULTS: While antral apoptosis in intestinal metaplasia was significantly lower than in non-intestinal metaplasia, proliferation was significantly higher (greater and lesser curvatures, P < 0.05, respectively). This resulted in a significantly lower apoptosis/proliferation ratio in intestinal metaplasia than in non-intestinal metaplasia (antrum greater and lesser curvatures and corpus greater curvature, P < 0.05). After successful eradication, apoptosis and proliferation decreased in both intestinal metaplasia and non-intestinal metaplasia. The pattern of reduction of apoptosis and proliferation differed in these two groups. However, in the corpus, the reduction resulted in a significant increase in the apoptosis/proliferation ratio in both. CONCLUSION: Proliferation and apoptosis are unevenly and disproportionately altered in H. pylori infection leading to an imbalance in cell kinetics. Eradication of the organism improves the balance and may possibly play a role in the prevention of malignancy transformation in the metaplastic mucosa.     

Severe acute gastritis associated with Helicobacter pylori infection

We describe the case of a young female referred to our unit because of acute upper abdominal symptoms. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy showed a gastric picture resembling lymphoma or acute non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug gastropathy (deep, large and irregular ulcers), but the clinical history and the histological examination of gastric biopsies were consistent only with acute gastritis Helicobacter pylori-correlated. The patient was treated with omeprazole and antibiotics with complete recovery. As the patient's cat had suffered from an acute gastrointestinal distress two weeks earlier, a case of zoonosis was hypothesized and an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed also on the cat. Unfortunately, we were not able to detect Helicobacter pylori in the cat gastric mucosa, but only urease-producing spiral microorganisms. Possible sources of infection and pathogenetic mechanisms of the severe gastritis are discussed.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in subjects with acute ischaemic stroke

AIMS: To determine whether infection with Helicobacter pylori is a significant risk factor for stroke. SUBJECTS: A total 467 in-patients with clinical evidence of acute ischaemic stroke and 388 healthy controls with no evidence of cerebrovascular disease. METHODS: This was a case control study. The prevalence of Helicobacter pylori was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in stroke patients and controls. A positive titre was defined as >15 U/ml and relationship with circulating plasma fibrinogen and social depravation was expressed using the Townsend Index. RESULTS: There were significantly more Helicobacter pylori positive individuals (274/398 (69%)) in the cases compared to the controls (206/352 (58.5%)). Fibrinogen levels were also significantly higher in Helicobacter pylori positive (mean 4.14, standard deviation 1.33) than negative individuals (mean 3.78, standard deviation 1.28). The association between Helicobacter pylori and stroke was lost in a logistic model controlling for socio-economic status. Furthermore, fibrinogen levels were not associated with Helicobacter pylori status in a linear regression model controlling for socio-economic status. CONCLUSIONS: Infection with Helicobacter pylori is associated with an increased risk of stroke and increased fibrinogen levels but these findings can be attributed to a confounding effect of socio-economic status.     

β-Lactamase inhibition with clavulanic acid supplementing standard amoxycillin-based triple therapy does not increase Helicobacter pylori eradication rate

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic resistance is the main reason of failure for H. pylori eradication and beta-lactamases produced by resistant H. pylori strains is a possible mechanism underlying ineffectiveness of an amoxycillin-based triple therapy. AIM: To investigate the benefit of using clavulanic acid associated with amoxycillin compared with amoxycillin alone in a standard triple therapy. METHODS: A total 172 H. pylori-positive dyspeptic patients were randomised to a daily treatment with esomeprazole (20 mg bid), clarithromycin (500 mg bid) and either amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid (1 g bid) or amoxycillin (1 g bid) alone for 1 week. H. pylori status was defined by histology and urea breath test at entry and following 8 weeks from the end of therapy by urea breath test and antigen faecal assessment. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis eradication rates achieved by amoxycillin plus clavulanic acid (72 and 78%) were higher, but not significantly, than those achieved by amoxycillin alone triple therapy (62 and 72%). Compliance was good, side-effects mild and with a similar incidence in both regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Clavulanic acid supplemented to amoxycillin-based standard triple therapy does not significantly increase the H. pylori eradication rate with standard triple therapy.