All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed knee operations. An “all-inside” technique creates bone sockets for ACL graft passage, as opposed to more traditional full bone tunnels, and typically incorporates suspensory fixation instead of screw fixation to secure the graft. This technique may be indicated for any ACL reconstruction surgery, where adequate bone stock exists to drill sockets and to use cortical fixation. The technique may be used with all soft tissue, as well as bone plug ACL grafts and autograft hamstring or quadriceps tendon; most allograft tendon options may be performed with an all-inside technique. Advantages include anatomic tunnel/socket placement, decreased postoperative pain and swelling, minimal hardware, appropriate graft tensioning and retensioning, and circumferential graft to bone healing. Tips for successful all-inside surgery include matching graft diameter to socket diameter, drilling appropriate length sockets based on individual graft length, so as not to “bottom out” the graft and confirming cortical button fixation intraoperatively. Potential complications include graft-socket mismatch, full-tunnel reaming, and loss of cortical fixation. Multiple studies have shown the all-inside technique to have similar or superior biomechanical properties and clinical outcomes compared to the more traditional full-tunnel ACL reconstruction techniques.     

Editorial Commentary: Goldilocks and the Three Grafts: Managing Tendon Harvest and Graft Length Problems in Autograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Autograft hamstring tendon harvest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction can occasionally result in a graft length that is inadequate for creation of a robust ACL graft. Patients at risk for an abnormally short hamstring may also be high risk for ACL reinjury. Graft augmentation with allograft may be a suboptimal solution to this problem. Therefore, a reliable means for preoperative estimation of hamstring tendon length by magnetic resonance imaging measurement could avoid this pitfall. However, even with a reliable correlation between magnetic resonance imaging measurement and actual harvested tendon length, establishing a simple, clinically relevant threshold below which hamstring grafts should be avoided remains elusive. By contrast, all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft avoids the potential length problems inherent to both bone tendon bone (graft–tunnel mismatch) and hamstring tendon grafts, but intermediate- and long-term outcome studies are still needed to validate all-soft-tissue quadriceps autograft in ACL reconstruction.     

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft

BACKGROUND: Surgical reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is indicated in the ACL-deficient knee with symptomatic instability and multiple ligaments injuries. Bone patellar tendon-bone and the hamstring tendon generally have been used. In the present study, we describe an alternative graft, the quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft, by using arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. METHODS: From March of 1996 through March of 1997, a quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft was used in 12 patients with ACL injuries. RESULTS: After 15 to 24 months of follow-up, the clinical outcome for those patients with this graft have been encouraging. Ten patients could return to the same or a higher level of preinjury sports activity. According to the International Knee Documentation Committee rating system, 10 of the 12 patients had normal or nearly normal ratings. Recovery of quadriceps muscle strength to 80% of the normal knee was achieved in 11 patients in 1 year. CONCLUSION: The advantages of the quadriceps tendon graft include the following: the graft is larger and stronger than the patellar tendon; morbidity of harvest technique and donor site is less than that of patellar tendon graft; there is little quadriceps inhibition after quadriceps harvest; there is quicker return to sports activities with aggressive rehabilitation. A quadriceps tendon-patellar autograft is a reasonable alternative to ACL reconstruction in patients who are not suitable for either a bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft.     

腘绳肌腱结合双固定技术重建前交叉韧带

目的探讨采用腘绳肌腱股骨端胫骨端双固定技术重建前交叉韧带(ACL)的可行性及近期疗效。方法对25例ACL损伤行关节镜下ACL重建术,采用笔者自行设计双监视法解剖等长重建技术建立股骨胫骨隧道。移植物股骨端用Endobutton钢板和Rigidfix固定,胫骨端用Bio-Intrafix和Stample门形加压钉固定。结果本组获随访12～18(13.76±1.61)个月,未发现滑膜炎、韧带断裂、活动度明显障碍等并发症。根据Lysholm膝关节功能评分,术前评分:20～48(31.32±8.71)分;术后1年评分:90～98(94.96±2.56)分(t=37.69,P<0.01)。结论在腘绳肌腱重建ACL中应用股骨端胫骨端双固定技术具有手术操作简便,固定牢固,效果可靠的优点,值得推广。     

膝关节镜下采用挤压螺钉固定骨-髌腱-骨自体移植重建前交叉韧带

目的　探讨采用关节镜下微创手术的方法重建膝关节前交叉韧带。　方法　在膝关节镜下采用挤压螺钉固定骨 髌腱 (中 1/ 3) 骨复合体自体移植重建前交叉韧带 ,术后 1年以上者 2 0例 ,平均随访时间 1年 5个月。　结果　按关节功能评定标准 ,本组 2 0例中 ,优 13例 ,良 5例 ,可 2例 ,优良率 90 % ;9例术后关节镜观察重建前交叉韧带的形态结构 ,7例塑形改建良好。　结论　关节镜下重建前交叉韧带手术创伤小 ,骨道定位准确、固定牢固 ,可做到等长重建 ,有利于早期康复 ;由于利用了自体骨 髌腱 骨组织 ,重建的韧带经塑形改建后可获得牢固的生物学固定     

Graft failure versus graft fixation in ACL reconstruction: histological and immunohistochemical studies in rabbits

The causes of graft failure after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction are multifactorial including the methods of graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to examine the ACL graft failure in three different methods of graft fixations including interference screw fixation, suture-post fixation and combined interference screw and suture-post fixation. We hypothesized that the fixation method after ACL reconstruction can affect the graft healing in tibial tunnel. Eighteen New Zealand white rabbits were categorized into three groups according to the method of fixation in unilateral ACL reconstruction with long digital extensor autograft. Histological examination demonstrated that the combined fixation and suture-post fixation groups showed significantly better integration between tendon and bone (P = 0.04). In immunohistochemical analysis, the combined fixation and suture-post fixation groups showed significantly higher BMP-2 and VEGF expressions than interference screw (P < 0.01). The tendon–bone healing after ACL reconstruction was affected by the method of graft fixation. Combined fixation with interference screw and suture-post reduced graft-tunnel micromotion and improved the graft healing in tibial tunnel.     

Editorial Commentary: With Appropriate Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Selection,All-Inside Reconstruction Results in Excellent Outcomes: Stay “Inside” and Be Cognizant of Hamstring Graft Diameter Expectations in Shorter Patients

All-inside anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a minimally invasive and anatomic technique with predictably excellent results. The array of graft choices that exists for skilled arthroscopists include semitendinosis autograft with or without gracilis, quadriceps tendon autograft, and patellar tendon autograft and allograft. The advantages of all-inside ACL reconstruction include independent femoral socket creation and less pain compared with a full tibial tunnel in the early postoperative period. This is a technique that should not trump appropriate graft selection. It is expected that autografts will fare better in younger patients who participate in activities at greater risk for ACL injuries. Selection of a semitendinosis autograft results in predictably excellent results when graft diameters are 8 mm or greater. Quadrupling the semitendinosis and adding the gracilis when needed can provide sufficient graft diameter in many patients. However, caution should be taken when harvesting hamstring grafts from shorter patients. Semitendinosis tendons in such patients are sometimes not long enough to quadruple and can result in a diameters less than 8 mm even when the gracilis is added. With appropriate graft selection, staying “inside” for ACL reconstruction is expected to result in great objective and subjective outcomes for our patients.     

Implant-free ACL reconstruction: a review

Implant-free anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is the fixation of ACL grafts without the need for artificial implants. Our aim was to study the evolution of this technique, review the biomechanical evidence and summarise the results. Implant-free graft fixation for bone patella tendon ACL reconstruction was first described in 1987. This concept of implant-free graft fixation was adapted for hamstring and quadriceps tendons as alternative graft sources. Various biomechanical studies have reported that by adhering to certain technical details, this technique provides comparable fixation strength as conventional ACL fixation. The outcome studies of implant-free ACL reconstruction also report clinical results similar to ACL reconstruction with conventional implants.     

Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps and semitendinosus tendon grafts

This study presents a novel arthroscopic technique for double-bundle reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. A quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft is used to reconstruct the major anterolateral bundle. An additional double-stranded semitendinosus tendon is used to reconstruct the posteromedial bundle. In 70° of flexion and full extension with anterior drawer force, the quadriceps tendon graft and semitendinosus tendon graft are fixed inside the anterior aspect of the single tibial tunnel, respectively. An anatomic reconstruction can be achieved by using these 2 autografts.     

One-incision endoscopic technique for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon–patellar bone autograft

Quadriceps tendon–patellar bone autograft is an alternative graft choice for posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction. A 2-incision technique with outside-in fixation at the femoral condyle is generally used. In this article, we describe a 1-incision endoscopic technique for PCL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon–patellar bone autograft. The graft consists of a proximal patellar bone plug and central quadriceps tendon. The bone plug is trapezoidal, 20 mm long, 10 mm wide, and 8 mm thick. The tendon portion is 80 mm long, 10 mm wide, and 6 mm thick, including the full-thickness of the rectus femoris and partial thickness of the vastus intermedius. Three arthroscopic portals, including anteromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial, are used. All procedures are performed in an endoscopic manner with only 1 incision at the proximal tibia. At the femoral side, the bone plug is fixed by an interference screw. At the tibial side, the tendon portion is fixed by a suture to a screw on the anterior cortex and an interference bioscrew in the posterior tibial tunnel opening. Quadriceps tendon autograft has the advantages of being self-available, allowing for easier arthroscopic technique, and providing comparable graft size. The 1-incision technique provides a simple reconstruction method for PCL insufficiency without a second incision at the medial femoral condyle.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 3 (March), 2001: pp 329–332     

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with quadriceps tendon autograft and press-fit fixation using an anteromedial portal technique

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: This article describes an arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction technique with a quadriceps tendon autograft using an anteromedial portal technique. METHODS: A 5 cm quadriceps tendon graft is harvested with an adjacent 2 cm bone block. The femoral tunnel is created through a low anteromedial portal in its anatomical position. The tibial tunnel is created with a hollow burr, thus acquiring a free cylindrical bone block. The graft is then passed through the tibial tunnel and the bone block, customized at its tip, is tapped into the femoral tunnel through the anteromedial portal to provide press-fit fixation. The graft is tensioned distally and sutures are tied over a bone bridge at the distal end of the tibial tunnel. From the cylindrical bone block harvested from the tibia the proximal end is customized and gently tapped next to the graft tissue into the tibial tunnel to assure press fitting of the graft in the tibial tunnel. The distal part of the tibial tunnel is filled up with the remaining bone.All patients were observed in a prospective fashion with subjective and objective evaluation after 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty patients have been evaluated at a 12 months follow-up. The technique achieved in 96.7% normal or nearly normal results for the objective IKDC. The mean subjective IKDC score was 86.1 [PLUS-MINUS SIGN] 15.8. In 96.7% the Tegner score was the same as before injury or decreased one category. A negative or 1+ Lachman test was achieved in all cases. Pivot-shift test was negative or (+) glide in 86.7%. The mean side-to-side difference elevated by instrumental laxity measurement was 1.6 [PLUS-MINUS SIGN] 1.1 mm. Full ROM has been achieved in 92.3%. The mean single one-leg-hop index was 91.9 [PLUS-MINUS SIGN] 8.0 at the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Potential advantages include minimum bone loss specifically on the femoral side and graft fixation without implants.     

膝关节镜下微创重建前交叉韧带

为使膝关节前交叉韧带重建手术定位准确,固定更加牢固和早期功能康复,同时减少手术创伤。1997年10月至1999年4月应用膝关节镜下挤压螺钉固定骨-髌腱(中1/3)-骨自体移植重建前交叉韧带的新技术,重建前交叉韧带74例,并取得良好效果。结果 表明该方法手术创伤小,骨道定位准确,能做到等长重建。由于充分利用了髌腱这一较为理想的自体材料,两端带有骨块,重建的韧带最终可达到牢固的生物学固定。作根据临床实践,结合全部病例,重点总结介绍了关节镜下重建前交叉韧带的临床技术和经验。     

Endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patella tendon autograft

The patella tendon is the most commonly used graft source for ACL reconstruction because of its biomechanical strength and stiffness, the availability of bone-to-bone healing on either end, and the ability to firmly secure the graft within the tunnels. Consistently good results have been reported in the literature, with expectations to return to all activities at pre-injury levels of performance. We outline our technique for endoscopic ACL reconstruction using a patella tendon autograft. The technique is divided into the critical stages of pre-operative assessment, graft harvest, notch preparation, tunnel placement, graft passage, graft fixation, and rehabilitation. Methods for avoiding pitfalls and overcoming mishaps are described.     

Rekonstruktion des vorderen Kreuzbandes

The treatment of ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays an essential role for both clinicians and resident physicians. To date many questions regarding the outcome as well as ACL reconstruction techniques have not yet been conclusively clarified. Whether reconstruction of the ACL protects the knee from osteoarthritis is still unproven; however, it is well known that an unstable knee joint is more vulnerable to secondary injuries, such as meniscal tears. Thus, early ACL reconstruction is recommended to minimize the risk of these secondary injuries. Three alternative sources of material for autologous ACL reconstruction are commonly utilized. An accessory hamstring (i.e. semitendinosus tendon with or without the gracilis tendon), a central strip of the patellar tendon with bone blocks and a central strip of the quadriceps tendon with or without bone block are the most common donor tissues used in autografts. Besides selection of the type of graft, the tendon diameter also plays a crucial role. Some progress has recently been made with respect to tunnel placement. The aim is to find an anatomical tunnel position. Reconstruction of both the anteromedial and the posterolateral ACL bundles helps to rebuild the anatomy of the original ACL; however, scientifically this approach did not lead to any improvement in the results. For fixation techniques a differentiation is made between aperture, extracortical and implant-free fixation. Generally, re-ruptures are less common than revisions as a result of graft ruptures due to technical mistakes during surgery. The most common mistakes concern tunnel placement and graft fixation. Also overlooked instability can have a negative influence on the outcome of ACL reconstruction.     

Hamstring autograft utilization in reconstructing anterior cruciate ligament: Review of harvesting techniques,graft preparation,and different fixation methods

Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a common orthopedic injury. Various graft options are available for the reconstruction of ruptured ACL. Using the hamstring muscle as an autograft was first described in 1934, and it remains a commonly harvested graft for ACL reconstruction. Hamstring autografts can be harvested using the traditional anteromedial approach or the newer posteromedial technique. An isolated semitendinosus tendon can be used or combined with the gracilis tendon. There are numerous methods for graft fixation, such as intra-tunnel or extra-tunnel fixation. This comprehensive review discusses the different hamstring muscle harvesting techniques and graft preparation options and fixation methods. It provides a comprehensive overview for choosing the optimal surgical technique when treating patients.     

An alternative cruciate reconstruction graft: The central quadriceps tendon

The central quadriceps tendon, above the patella, is thicker and wider than the patella tendon. Using precise technique, one can obtain a tendon graft for cruciate reconstruction with 50% greater mass than a patellar tendon bone-tendonbone graft of similar width. The central quadriceps tendon graft may be harvested by a second surgeon while the first surgeon is simultaneously accomplishing notchplasty and tunnel placement for cruciate ligament reconstruction. Consequently, this cruciate ligament reconstruction graft offers time savings as well as greater tendon volume. The central quadriceps tendon graft is difficult to harvest, with significant risk of entering the suprapatellar pouch and losing knee distension during ACL reconstruction. By careful adherence to the technique described in this article, the surgeon can obtain this reconstruction graft safely. It is important to recognize the anatomic subtleties of the proximal patella, which include a curved proximal surface, dense cortical bone, and closely adherent suprapatellar pouch. Proper technique is of utmost importance in obtaining this tendon graft safely and efficiently.     

Quadriceps Tendon Graft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: THE GRAFT OF THE FUTURE!

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic surgeries performed on active people in the world. One of the most important surgical decisions is graft type for use in the reconstruction. Despite extensive research on optimal graft choice for ACL reconstruction, discrepancy exists among practicing surgeons' graft preference. Recently, the quadriceps tendon has gained popularity for use as a graft source for ACL reconstruction.The all soft tissue quadriceps graft offers many advantages over other autograft choices. Histologically it has 20% more collagen fibrils per cross-sectional area than the patellar tendon (PT). Biomechanically, its ultimate load is 70% > than that of a similar width PT graft, while its modulus is more similar to the native ACL than either the PT or hamstring graft. Anatomically the quadriceps tendon has significantly more volume than the PT. Thus, even after harvest of the quadriceps graft, the remaining quadriceps tendon is still 80% stronger than the intact PT!The length and cross-sectional area of the quadriceps tendon graft can be tailored to the needs of the patient. On any patient over 5 feet tall, a graft length of 7 cm can be obtained. Because the thickness of the tendon is almost twice the thickness of the same patient's PT, a graft diameter from 7 to 11 mm can easily be achieved. Thus, this graft can be customized for both primary and revision surgeries.Harvest site morbidity is minimal. An incision less than 2 cm in an area with no significant cutaneous nerves without harvest of any patella bone leads to no significant harvest site pain, numbness, or palpable defect.Clinical outcomes using this graft are excellent. Our prospective data on nearly 1,000 grafts, with a mean patient age of 20 years old, show a 4.2% failure rate. Thus, the all soft tissue quadriceps graft will be the surgical choice for ACL reconstruction for future athletes.     

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A New Technique for Achilles Tendon Allograft Preparation

We describe a new technique in Achilles tendon allograft preparation for use in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction that allows for secure bony interference fixation on each side of the joint and aperture fixation for all patients. In addition, preparation of the graft in this manner avoids some problems that are frequently encountered with patellar tendon allografts, including graft tunnel mismatch and limited availability. Previous studies have reported successful results with Achilles tendon allograft use in ACL reconstruction with soft tissue fixation in the tibial tunnel. Bony interference fixation on the tibial side can be achieved by suturing a free bone plug to the tendon end of an Achilles allograft. We use a 9-mm circular oscillating saw to harvest a free 30-mm length bone plug from the remaining calcaneal bone block. This is then sutured directly to the tendon end of a bone-Achilles tendon allograft with the use of No. 1 nonabsorbable suture placed through 3 equally spaced drill holes in the free bone plug. Tendon length between the bone plugs can be individually set for each patient at a distance equivalent to the length of the native ACL (intra-articular distance between the femoral and tibial tunnels). After graft passage, the construct is tensioned and secured with interference screws, similar to a traditional bone–patellar tendon–bone graft. The senior author (S.G.) has performed 40 procedures with excellent results and reports no cases of tibial fixation failure. Biomechanical and long-term follow-up studies are in progress.     

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using semitendinosus and gracilis tendons,bone patellar tendon,or quadriceps tendon-graft with press-fit fixation without hardware. A new and innovative procedure

BONE--PATELLAR TENDON: The "no hardware" technique for ACL reconstruction is a new method that offers many advantages and is straightforward to perform. Its main innovative feature is that it does not require bone-block harvesting from the patella. This reduces donor site morbidity and prevents patellar fractures. The bone tunnels are made using tube harvesters and compaction drilling. This minimizes trauma and obviates the risk of bone necrosis. The articular entrance of the tibial tunnel is completely occupied by the grafts. This prevents a windshield-wiper effect and synovial fluid ingress into the tunnel, and enhances graft incorporation. The fact that no hardware is used with both patellar tendon or hamstring grafts significantly reduces the overall cost of the operation and facilitates revision surgery. The quadriceps tendon is also a very good graft. It is thick and has good biomechanical properties and low donor site morbidity. Its disadvantages are: weakness of quadriceps after the operation, an unsightly scar, and some difficulty in graft harvesting [58]. Also, postoperative MRI is not fraught with the problem of metal artifacts. It is difficult to decide which of the methods currently available for ACL reconstruction is the best because most of them give satisfactory results. In the future, assessments of knee ligament reconstruction techniques should look at long-term stability combined with low complication rates. Ease of revision surgery and low cost should also be taken into consideration, given the large annual volume of knee ligament reconstructions (50,000 in the United States alone) [59]. We believe that our technique addresses most of these issues, and that it constitutes a useful alternative method for ACL reconstruction. SEMITENDINOSUS--GRACILIS: This technique, which was used with 915 patients from June 1998 to February 2002, shows a particularly low rate of postoperative morbidity. The reason is probably to be found in the "waterproofing" of the bone tunnels, which lead to less postoperative bleeding and swelling. No drains were used. Rehabilitation follows the same protocol as used for the reconstruction using patellar tendon grafts (accelerated/functional). As expected, there was no widening of the femoral tunnels and little widening of the tibial tunnels. Interestingly, tibial tunnel enlargement was significantly less in a nonaccelarated rehabilitation group than in the accelerated group [60] without affecting stability. The measured internal torque of the hamstrings, as well as their flexion force, already had returned to normal 12 months postoperatively. In a prospective randomized (unpublished) study comparing this technique with ACL reconstruction with BPT grafts with medial or lateral third with only one bone plug (from the tibial tuberosity, see technique described above), we found no significant difference between both groups in subjective scores, stability, KT-1000 values, Tegner activity score, and IKDC at 1-year follow-up. Only the results of kneeling and knee walking testing were significantly better in the hamstring group [61]. In summary, the advantages of this presented technique are: (1) the knot of the graft is close proximally to the anatomic site of the insertion of the ACL, thus avoiding the Bungee effect.; (2) the press-fit tunnel fixation prevents synovial fluid entering the bone tunnels, windshield-wiper effect, and longitudinal motion within the tunnel; the intensive contact between the bony wall of the tunnel and graft collagen over a long distance without any suture material results in quick and complete graft incorporation; and (3) no fixation material means no hardware problems, facilitates revision surgery, and lowers overall costs.     

生物骨传导性骨水泥促进前交叉韧带重建术腱骨愈合的研究进展(英文)

近10年来,应用软组织移植物行前交叉韧带重建术越来越普遍。手术的远期疗效主要取决于肌腱移植物能否在骨隧道内达到坚强的腱-骨愈合。但是,目前面临的问题是肌腱移植物在骨隧道内获得腱-骨愈合所需要的时间相当长。研究发现,在腱-骨界面局部应用生物骨传导性的骨水泥能有效地促进肌腱移植物的骨愈合。这类骨水泥主要是磷酸钙。本文就生物骨传导性骨水泥促进前交叉韧带重建术腱-骨愈合的研究进展作一综述。