Neuropsychological testing in the screening for cochlear implant candidacy

OBJECTIVE :To demonstrate the utility of neuropsychological assessment in the screening process for pediatric cochlear implant candidacy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective and ongoing evaluation of children with profound bilateral hearing loss using age-specific neuropsychological test batteries. METHODS: Eighteen children who met audiological criteria for cochlear implantation were evaluated by two age-specific neuropsychological tests. The Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales survey assesses several domains of behavioral functions (communication, daily living skills, socialization, and gross motor skills). The Mullen Scales of Early Learning assess the child's visual perception, speech and language, and motor abilities. The Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised assesses intellectual ability. RESULTS: All patients underwent the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales survey. Overall scores were lower than normative means with a mean composite score in the 7th percentile. In addition, there was a strong inverse correlation between score and age of testing. Ten children were assessed using the Mullen Scales of Early Learning, and, again, there was a strong inverse correlation between score and age of testing. Intellectual ability was assessed in seven children using the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised and was found to be lower than normative means with a mean score in the 13th percentile. CONCLUSIONS: Neuropsychological testing of profoundly deaf children provides a detailed and accurate assessment of the child's cognitive, behavioral, and motor functions. The profoundly deaf child does not develop at the same rate as normal children in cognitive and behavioral domains. Neuropsychological testing is a useful tool for screening for cochlear implant candidacy and has the potential to track changes before and after implantation.     

Divergence of fine and gross motor skills in prelingually deaf children: implications for cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess relations between fine and gross motor development and spoken language processing skills in pediatric cochlear implant users. STUDY DESIGN: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of longitudinal data. METHODS: Prelingually deaf children who received a cochlear implant before age 5 and had no known developmental delay or cognitive impairment were included in the study. Fine and gross motor development were assessed before implantation using the Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales, a standardized parental report of adaptive behavior. Fine and gross motor scores reflected a given child's motor functioning with respect to a normative sample of typically developing, normal-hearing children. Relations between these preimplant scores and postimplant spoken language outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: In general, gross motor scores were found to be positively related to chronologic age, whereas the opposite trend was observed for fine motor scores. Fine motor scores were more strongly correlated with postimplant expressive and receptive language scores than gross motor scores. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest a disassociation between fine and gross motor development in prelingually deaf children: fine motor skills, in contrast to gross motor skills, tend to be delayed as the prelingually deaf children get older. These findings provide new knowledge about the links between motor and spoken language development and suggest that auditory deprivation may lead to atypical development of certain motor and language skills that share common cortical processing resources.     

Prelinguistic communication and subsequent language acquisition in children with cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between prelinguistic communication behaviors and subsequent language development after cochlear implantation in deaf children. Evaluative tools with predictive validity for language potential in very young deaf children remain elusive. SETTING: A tertiary care cochlear implant center and a preschool setting of spoken language immersion in which oral language development is emphasized through auditory and oral motor subskill practice. SUBJECTS: Eighteen prelingually deaf children who underwent unilateral implantation at an average age of 15 months also underwent testing with the Communication and Symbolic Behavior Scales (CSBS) before device activation and with the Reynell Developmental Language Scales (RDLS) at an average of 20 months after cochlear implantation. METHODS: A prospective study correlated preoperative communication behavior assessments of 18 children who were candidates for cochlear implantation. We examined the value of prelinguistic behavioral testing with the CSBS in predicting later language level after cochlear implantation as reflected in RDLS scores. RESULTS: We found positive, though weak, correlations between prelinguistic communication skills (CSBS scores) and language learning after cochlear implantation (RDLS scores). Linear correlation between test results failed to reach statistical significance (receptive comparisons, P =.17; expressive comparisons, P =.13). CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating the quality of prelinguistic communication behaviors potentially adds important predictive information to profiles of children who are candidates for cochlear implantation. Correlative analysis suggests that early CSBS testing may provide useful clinical information. Poor CSBS scores may serve as a precaution: if children lack an appropriate prelinguistic behavioral repertoire, the emergence of age-appropriate formal language may be at risk. Observations suggest that symbolic prelinguistic behaviors are necessary, but not sufficient, for the development of strong linguistic skills. The variability of behavioral measures in very young deaf children poses challenges in designing objective measures with predictive value for later language level.     

Behavioral assessment of prelingually deaf children before cochlear implantation

Objectives/Hypothesis: To determine whether scores from a behavioral assessment of prelingually deafened children who present for cochlear implant surgery are predictive of audiological outcomes Study Design: Retrospective review of longitudinal data collected from 42 children with prelingual hearing loss who presented for a cochlear implant before age 5 years. Methods: The Vineland Adaptive Behavioral Scales (VABS) was administered during the preimplant workup. Standardized scores reflect daily living skills, socialization, and motor development compared with a normative sample. Regression analyses were conducted to determine whether any subject variables were related to VABS scores. Mixed‐model analyses were computed to determine whether preimplant VABS scores were predictive of longitudinal spoken‐language data obtained after cochlear implant surgery. Results: Motor scores tended to be higher than nonmotor scores. Nonmotor scores were significantly lower than the normative mean and decreased with testing age. Children with acquired deafness demonstrated lower motor scores than children with congenital causes. Children with higher motor scores demonstrated significantly higher performance on language, vocabulary, and word recognition tests than children with lower motor scores. Nonmotor domains were not as robustly related to spoken‐language measures, although similar trends were observed Conclusion: Profound deafness and language delay may confound the assessment of daily living skills and socialization in the population studied. Motor development appears to proceed normally in prelingually deafened children and is a preimplant predictor of spoken‐language outcome in young infants and children with cochlear implants, a finding consistent with the large body of work establishing links between perceptual‐motor and language development.     

Bilingual oral language proficiency in children with cochlear implants

OBJECTIVE: To document oral language proficiency in a group of prelingually deaf bilingual children with a cochlear implant. DESIGN: Using a repeated-measures paradigm, oral language skills in the first and second language were evaluated at 2 yearly intervals after implantation. Language data were compared with normative data from children with normal hearing. SUBJECTS: Twelve deaf children between the ages of 20 months and 15 years who had received a cochlear implant before the age of 3 years. OUTCOME MEASURE: First-language skills were assessed using 1 of 2 standardized tests, either the Oral and Written Language Scales or the Reynell Developmental Language Scales, depending on the child's age. Second-language proficiency was assessed using the Student Oral Language Observation Matrix. RESULTS: Average standard scores in the first language fell solidly within the average range of normal-hearing peers. Second-language skills showed steady improvement from year 1 to year 2, along a continuum that reflected the amount and intensity of exposure of the child to the second language and the length of experience with the implant. CONCLUSION: A cochlear implant can make oral proficiency in more than 1 language possible for prelingually deaf children.     

Parental decision-making in considering cochlear implant technology for a deaf child

OBJECTIVES: Advances in cochlear implant (CI) technology have increased the complexity of treating childhood deafness. We compare parental decision-making, values, beliefs, and preferences between parents of eligible and ineligible children in considering cochlear implants. METHODS: Surveys were obtained from 83 hearing parents of deaf children. A subset of 50 parents also underwent semi-structured interviews. Nine hypothetical outcomes, ranging from mainstream success to poor mainstream outcome were created to measure parents' overall preferences and preference for specific outcomes for their child who is deaf. RESULTS: Among parents of eligible children (n = 50), approximately 2/3 considered implantation (n = 33). The other 1/3 did not consider implantation. Parents who were eligible but did not consider implantation placed significantly lower priority on mainstream success over bilingual success (P < 0.03), and on the child's ability to speak versus sign (P < 0.02). They also showed significantly higher concerns on the cost of services in general and on the availability of resources offered at the local school district (both P > 0.05). Parents of ineligible children (n = 30) rarely considered implantation, even if they showed similar aspirations in mainstream outcomes (P = 0.003). Semi-structured interview data supported these findings. CONCLUSIONS: The decision to consider cochlear implantation is strongly influenced by the eligibility and by professionals' recommendations. However, for some parents, the decision goes beyond eligibility and is determined by parental preferences, goals, values, and beliefs. This highlights the importance of careful audiologic evaluation and professionals' awareness of and sensitivity to parental goals, values, and beliefs in evaluating the child's candidacy.     

Predicting academic performance in children with language impairment: the role of parent report

This study examines the ability of preschool speech-language measures and parent report in predicting later academic performance. Preschool measures of speech, language and communication for 35 children with language impairment were analyzed for their ability to predict reading, writing, spelling, and mathematics in these same children at age nine. Regression analyses revealed that scores from the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales Communication Domain (a parent report instrument) were the best predictors of scores on measures of reading, writing, and math, while the scores from the Photo Articulation Test best predicted spelling outcomes. The results are discussed relative to the value of parent report in assessing and managing language impairment, and predicting scholastic performance in preschool children.     

Educational performance of pediatric cochlear implant recipients in mainstream classes

OBJECTIVES: The present study documents the school performance of 20 pediatric cochlear implant recipients who attended mainstream classes and compares their educational performance with their normally hearing peers. METHODOLOGY: All 20 school-aged children who underwent cochlear implantation at the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia cochlear implant programme participated in this study. Three measures were employed to assess the school performance. First, using the SIFTER teacher-rating scale, the second measure was the child's examination results, and the third was the child's standing compared to his/her peers in language subject, mathematics, and the overall academic performance during the end of semester examinations. RESULTS: The SIFTER rating scale indicated that only 11.8% of the children were identified as not educationally at risk, 17.6% passed four of the SIFTER subtests, whereas the other 71.6% failed in at least two of the subtests on SIFTER. The highest pass rate was obtained in behavior subtest (76.5%), followed by classroom participation (70.6%), attention (58.8%), academic (47.1%), and communication (11.8%). On the educational performance, the cochlear implant recipients performed significantly better in mathematics (mean scores 62.67%; S.D. 22.24) than in language (mean scores 49.96%, S.D. 25.88) (p<0.01). In the overall examination performance, 25.00% had above average performance (>75th percentile), 18.75% had average performance (25-75th percentile), and another 56.25% performed at below average (<25th percentile). CONCLUSION: Children with cochlear implant were rated poorly in the SIFTER communication subtest. It is possible that language deficit presents an educational challenge in these children. The educational performance of children with cochlear implants in mainstream classes varies. Although 43.75% of them thrive well in a full-time mainstream setting, a significant percentage of them (56.25%) performed at below the average level. These findings reemphasize that although a cochlear implant has successfully provided deaf children with a good hearing potential, the majority of its recipients still require additional educational supports in order to function well in the mainstream educational setting.     

Children with cochlear implants: changing parent and deaf community perspectives

OBJECTIVE: To examine changing parent and deaf community perspectives related to pediatric cochlear implantation. DESIGN: This research is based primarily on 2 nonrandom study designs. In the first study, conducted by the Gallaudet University Research Institute, Washington, DC, in the spring of 1999, a 12-page questionnaire was distributed to 1841 parents of children with cochlear implants; 439 questionnaires were returned. In the second study, we conducted 56 interviews with parents of 62 children with implants (and 1 without). SUBJECTS: Parents of children with cochlear implants; Gallaudet University faculty, staff, students, and alumni. RESULTS: While parents frequently receive conflicting information about educational and communication options for their child, they generally support signing before and after implantation. The parents of a child with an implant have a great interest in their child's spoken language development, and most would like to have had their child receive an implant earlier. Children with implants are educated in a variety of educational settings. Mainstreamed children with implants often continue to require classroom support services, and children with implants are frequently not isolated from both deaf and hearing peers. Parents have mixed experiences when getting information from persons in the deaf community. COMMENT: Opposition to pediatric cochlear implantation within the deaf community is giving way to the perception that it is one of a continuum of possibilities for parents to consider. To ensure optimal use of the cochlear implant, parents need to remain involved in their child's social and educational development.     

Development of spoken language grammar following cochlear implantation in prelingually deaf children

OBJECTIVES: To assess the development of grammar comprehension in spoken language in prelingually deaf children following cochlear implantation and compare their grammatical abilities with those of their hearing peers. DESIGN: A prospective study of 82 consecutive prelingually deaf children up to 5 years following implantation. The children were less than 7 years old at the time of implantation (mean age +/- SD, 4.2 +/- 1.3 years). All received the same multichannel cochlear implant system. No child was lost to follow-up and there were no exclusions from the study. SETTING: Tertiary referral cochlear implant center. METHODS: The children were assessed using the Test for Reception of Grammar. This individually administered, multiple-choice test designed to assess the understanding of grammatical contrasts in the English language also allows direct comparison of grammar comprehension between test subjects and their normal-hearing peers. RESULTS: Before implantation, only a small proportion (2%) of prelingually deaf children were above the first percentile of their normal-hearing peers. This percentage increased to 40% and 67%, respectively, 3 and 5 years after implantation; and 5 years after implantation, 20% of the children performed between the 25th and the 75th percentile or better. In the subgroup of children who received their cochlear device before the age of 4 years, this percentage reached 36%. CONCLUSIONS: Spoken language grammar acquisition in prelingually deaf children with a cochlear implant was found to be considerably delayed. However, there was a clear trend toward the development of grammar skills following cochlear implantation, and the greatest advance was made by children who received their implant at a younger age. These findings support the present trend toward early implantation.     

Cochlear implant outcomes in children with motor developmental delay

Introduction

Multiple handicapped children and children with syndromes and conditions resulting additional disabilities such as cerebral palsy, global developmental delay and autistic spectrum disorder, are now not routinely precluded from receiving a cochlear implant. The primary focus of this study was to determine the effect of cochlear implants on the speech perception and intelligibility of deaf children with and without motor development delay.

Method

In a cohort study, we compared cochlear implant outcomes in two groups of deaf children with or without motor developmental delay (MDD). Among 262 children with pre-lingual profound hearing loss, 28 (10%) had a motor delay based on Gross Motor Function Classification (GMFC). Children with severe motor delays (classification scale levels 4 and 5) and cognitive delays were excluded. All children completed the Categories of Auditory Perception Scales (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) prior to surgery and 24 months after the device was activated.

Result

The mean age for the study population was 4.09 ± 1.86 years. In all 262 patients the mean CAP score after surgery (5.38 ± 0.043) had a marked difference in comparison with the mean score before surgery (0.482 ± 0.018) (P = 0.001). The mean CAP score after surgery for MDD children was 5.03, and was 5.77 for normal motor development children (NMD). The mean SIR score after surgery for MDD children was 2.53, and was 2.66 for NMD children. The final results of CAP and SIR did not have significant difference between NMD children versus MDD children (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Regarding to the result, we concluded that children with hearing loss and concomitant MDD as an additional disabilities can benefit from cochlear implantation similar to those of NMD.     

The cognition and behaviour of children with cochlear implants, children with hearing aids and their hearing peers: a comparison

Hearing impairment has been associated with cognitive deficits. It is not yet clear whether cochlear implants enable children to reduce or overcome these deficits. This study examined whether hearing impaired children with cochlear implants differed from hearing impaired children without cochlear implants or from hearing children. The three age-matched groups were compared on a non-verbal measure of cognition, the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised (LIPS-R), and a measure of behaviour, the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL). Apart from their scores on the Attention Sustained Subtest of the LIPS-R, the performance of the implanted group and the hearing group closely corresponded, while the hearing impaired children without cochlear implants performed below the level achieved by both these groups. There were no differences between any groups on the CBCL. It was concluded that hearing impaired children with cochlear implants were able to perform at the same non-verbal cognitive level as hearing children.     

Cognition in children with sensorineural hearing loss: etiologic considerations

OBJECTIVES: A considerable amount of literature has documented the impact of hearing impairment on spoken language skills in deaf children referred for cochlear implantation. Critical areas of neurocognitive development in the acquisition of visual (manual) language also appear to be impacted, although the evidence is less robust. The present study focused on the development of visual and fine motor skills in a sample of preschool-age children diagnosed with sensorineural hearing loss with no known neurologic conditions (n=36). STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of data collected as part of a standardized screening process for cochlear implantation at an academic medical center. METHOD: Children underwent a standardized neuropsychological assessment battery. Children were classified into three groups based on the etiology of their deafness (Connexin=15, Structural Malformation=11, and Unknown=10). RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Correlational analyses replicated previous research on the reduction in visual reception and fine motor skills as deaf children age. Children with genetic (Connexin) etiology exhibited a significant reduction in fine motor skills with age, whereas those with an etiology of Structural Abnormality exhibited a significant reduction in visual reception skills with age. Results of planned comparisons conducted as part of a multivariate analysis of variance (Skill x Group) indicated that the Connexin group was significantly better than the Unknown group with regard to fine motor skills. Implications for these findings and future studies are discussed.     

Social skills and developmental delay: importance in predicting the auditory and speech outcomes after cochlear implantation in children

Conclusion: Preoperative evaluation of social interaction and global development levels using the Vineland Social Maturity Scale (VSMS) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development–2nd edition (BSID-II) may be beneficial in predicting the postoperative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. In particular, cautious preoperative counseling regarding the poor postoperative prognosis may be necessary in children with low social skills and developmental status. Objective: To determine the clinical benefit of preoperative evaluation of social interaction and global development levels using VSMS and BSID-II in predicting the postoperative outcome in pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Patients: A total of 65 deaf children who underwent cochlear implantation (CI) were included in this study. Age at the time of implantation ranged from 12 to 76 months. All of the children underwent a comprehensive preimplant psychological assessment by a clinical psychologist. The VSMS and BSID-II were used for evaluating social skills and a child’s development preoperatively. A social quotient (SQ) was calculated by using the VSMS for each subject using the following formula: (social age/chronological age) × 100. The auditory perception and speech production abilities were evaluated using the Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) scale and the Korean version of the Ling’s stage (K-Ling), respectively, at 1 year after CI. The associations between the preoperative SQ/developmental levels and the postoperative auditory/speech outcomes were evaluated. Results: The mean SQ was significantly decreased in the enrolled children (90.6 ± 26.1). The improvement in CAP score at 1 year after CI was correlated with preoperative SQ. The improvements in phonemic and phonologic levels of K-Ling were correlated with preoperative VSMS and BSID-II scores.     

Communication and socialization skills at ages 2 and 3 in "late-talking" young children

Twenty-one apparently normal children between 18 and 34 months of age with slow expressive language acquisition were compared to a group of normally speaking children matched for age, SES, and sex ratio, on the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Sparrow, Balla, & Cicchetti, 1984). The late talkers (LTs) scored significantly lower not only in expressive communication, but also in receptive communication and socialization. A follow-up study of the same subjects, seen at age 3, showed nearly half the 3-year-olds with a history of LT remained delayed in expressive communication and socialization, while one third remained behind in receptive language. The data suggest that social skills are particularly vulnerable to disruption in children with late expressive language development, even after communication skills have moved into the normal range. They suggest, further, that receptive deficits do not seem, in themselves, to increase the risk of continued language delay. Clinical implications of these findings are discussed.     

Parental values in the decision about cochlear implantation

Parents of children who are deaf are required to make decisions shortly after diagnosis that will affect the child's method of communication and educational placement. This study examines the role of parental values and preferences in this decision making process. Twenty families with a deaf child participated in this study. Parents from 19 of these families completed a multi-attribute preference study, which assesses their preference for different outcomes in four domains, i.e. academic achievement, social life, communication, and emotional well being. In ten of these families, the child had received a cochlear implant. Results indicate wide variability in parental preferences, which do not appear to correlate with the parents' decisions to choose cochlear implantation. Interview data from the study provides some insight into the parents' motivations. The small size of the study limits further analysis of factors that influence parents' choices and suggests further study with larger numbers of families.     

Prediction of verbal and numerical comprehension in patients with cochlear implants

BACKGROUND: Cognitive abilities determine the outcome of cochlear implantation. Neuropsychological tests of intellectual, memory, attentional and emotional functions were applied pre-operatively in 33 deaf patients receiving a cochlear implant. The outcome of verbal and numerical comprehension was measured in a subgroup of 14 patients post-operatively and correlated with pre-operative neuropsychological performance. METHODS: Neuropsychological performance was recorded using standardized tests for intellectual abilities (abbreviated Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale [WAIS], crystallized intelligence scale), memory performance (Benton Visual Retention Test), attentional functions (d2 letter-cancellation-test), reaction time (Vienna Reaction Test) and emotional state (personality inventories). Verbal and numerical comprehension was measured post-operatively following adaptation of the speech processor. Performance and comprehension data were correlated. RESULTS: Cognitive performance parameters did not differ significantly from those of a healthy group. There was a correlation of r = +0.65 between numerical comprehension and the "mosaic-test", a subtest of the WAIS and of r = +0.78 between numerical comprehension and the crystallized intelligence scale. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative cognitive parameters may predict the outcome of cochlear implants.     

皮层听觉诱发电位评估人工耳蜗植入语前聋儿童的中枢听觉系统发育

目的研究人工耳蜗植入语前聋儿童的皮层听觉诱发电位(cortical auditory evoked potential,CAEP)P1波潜伏期的发展规律,评估不同年龄段植入人工耳蜗语前聋儿童的中枢听觉系统的发育。方法以人工耳蜗植入语前聋儿童50例(植入年龄15~66月,平均38.7±15.2月,其中小于42月龄者27例,大于42月龄者23例)和年龄相匹配的正常听力儿童50例为研究对象,采用500、1000、2000、4000 Hz四种频率的短纯音(tone burst,TB)刺激声分别对受试者进行皮层听觉诱发电位测试,并对人工耳蜗植入语前聋儿童进行婴幼儿有意义听觉整合量表或有意义听觉整合量表(infant-toddler meaningful auditory integration scale/meamingful auditory integration scale,IT-MAIS/MAIS)评分,比较两组P1波潜伏期,对P1波潜伏期和IT-MAIS/MAIS评分进行相关性分析。结果正常听力儿童四种不同频率短纯音刺激记录的CAEP P1波潜伏期与年龄均呈负相关(P<0.01);42月龄前植入人工耳蜗的语前聋儿童P1波潜伏期与正常听力儿童无统计学差异(P>0.05);42月龄以后植入人工耳蜗的语前聋儿童的P1波潜伏期较正常儿童显著延长,差异有显著统计学意义(P<0.01)。人工耳蜗植入儿童的CAEP P1波潜伏期与IT-MAIS/MAIS量表评分均呈负相关(P<0.01),不同频率TB刺激声下的P1波潜伏期无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论大于42月龄植入人工耳蜗的语前聋儿童的中枢听觉系统发育较正常听力儿童延迟。     

Parent interaction course in order to enhance communication skills between parents and children following pediatric cochlear implantation

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a parent interaction training course on the communication skills of parents of young implanted children. The training course was designed to help parents to be less controlling in their interactions with their deaf children and to facilitate the development of spoken language. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study comparing the communication skills of parents of deaf children fitted with cochlear implants before and after a parent interaction training course. SETTING: Pediatric tertiary referral center for cochlear implantation. METHODS: Video samples were taken of parents interacting with their children 1 month before the course (ranging from 15 days to 2 months) and after the course (ranging from 15 days to 1 month). Video samples were then transcribed orthographically and parents' turns in the interaction were assigned to one of two categories: (a) initiations--the parent initiates conversation or introduces a new topic and (b) responses--the parent responds to the child's previous turn. 12 months after completion of the course, the process was repeated in order to establish the relative permanence of changes in behavior. HYPOTHESIS: The parents' turns would shift from a predominance of initiations to a predominance of responses as a result of attendance on the course. This would demonstrate that the parents were less controlling of their children in communication and were exhibiting more contingent behavior--responding to their child's initiations rather than expecting the child to respond to theirs. PATIENTS: The study involved 17 parents of 11 implanted children. The mean age at implantation was 4 years (range: 2.2-6.3 years). The implant experience of the children ranged from 2 to 23 months at the time of the study. All children used total communication. RESULTS: The post-course initiations were half those of the pre-course ones (median from 14 decreased to 7) and the responses were almost double following the course (median from 8 increased to 14). Both differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). 12 months after the course, the responses score remained high with a median score of 16.5. However, a slight but significant increase in the initiation scores was also noted (median from 7 to 8.5). Parental satisfaction of the course was found to be high as no families failed to attend on any of the occasions despite the great distances some of them had to travel. CONCLUSION: The format of the parent interaction training course was found to be highly acceptable to the parents and the components covered proved to be effective in promoting positive changes in parental communication behavior. Clinicians need to provide a responsive environment for implanted deaf children and help others to do the same. The training course provided a very useful forum to share insights and skills and to evaluate ways of enhancing the communication between parents and children following cochlear implantation.     

Developmental delay and outcomes in paediatric cochlear implantation: implications for candidacy

OBJECTIVE: Criteria for paediatric cochlear implant candidacy continue to evolve, as research indicates an increasingly broad range of children for whom the procedure can produce benefit. Children with difficulties in addition to their deafness, or global developmental delay, are not routinely excluded. The aim of this study is to explore the association between developmental delay in young paediatric cochlear implant candidates and progress with the device. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study is a retrospective case series analysis of 32 children, aged between 1.2 and 2.8 years at pre-implant assessment. Children were assessed using the Schedule of Growing Skills II and IT-MAIS before implantation. Progress in speech perception and Speech Intelligibility was monitored using the E2L toy test and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), respectively, 1 and 2 years after switch-on. RESULTS: Data were subjected to regression analyses, with either the E2L or SIR as the outcome variables, and variables derived from the Schedule of Growing Skills II (general development and cognitive functioning), IT-MAIS, age at switch-on and average aided hearing loss pre-implant as the predictor variables. In each analysis the strongest (and statistically significant) predictors of speech perception and Speech Intelligibility were the measures of general development and cognitive functioning, accounting for around 40% of the variance in outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study indicates the value of routinely assessing the general development of young paediatric cochlear implant candidates, as part of the pre-implant decision-making process. Significant developmental delay is predictive of poor outcomes, but children with a mild delay do make appreciable progress. Developmental assessment of young deaf children is therefore important in terms of candidacy decisions and counselling parents regarding potential benefit from a cochlear implant.