Comparison of FDG PET and positron coincidence detection imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with 5/8-inch NaI(Tl) crystals in patients with suspected body malignancies

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) images obtained with (a) a dual-head coincidence gamma camera (DHC) equipped with 5/8-inch-thick NaI(Tl) crystals and parallel slit collimators and (b) a dedicated positron emission tomograph (PET) in a series of 28 patients with known or suspected malignancies. Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected malignancies underwent whole-body FDG PET imaging (Siemens, ECAT 933) after injection of approximately 10 mCi of 18F-FDG. FDG DHC images were then acquired for 30 min over the regions of interest using a dual-head gamma camera (VariCam, Elscint). The images were reconstructed in the normal mode, using photopeak/photopeak, photopeak/Compton, and Compton/photopeak coincidence events. FDG PET imaging found 45 lesions ranging in size from 1 cm to 7 cm in 28 patients. FDG DHC imaging detected 35/45 (78%) of these lesions. Among the ten lesions not seen with FDG DHC imaging, eight were less than 1.5 cm in size, and two were located centrally within the abdomen suffering from marked attenuation effects. The lesions were classified into three categories: thorax (n=24), liver (n=12), and extrahepatic abdominal (n=9). FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the thorax group and 78% of those below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 83%. FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm, in the liver and 43% of lesions below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 67%. FDG DHC imaging identified 78% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the extrahepatic abdominal group. There were no lesions below 1.5 cm in this group. FDG coincidence imaging using a dual-head gamma camera detected 90% of lesions greater than 1.5 cm. These data suggest that DHC imaging can be used clinically in well-defined diagnostic situations to differentiate benign from malignant lesions.     

Comparison of FDG PET and positron coincidence detection imaging using a dual-head gamma camera with 5/8-inch NaI(Tl) crystals in patients with suspected body malignancies

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) images obtained with (a) a dual-head coincidence gamma camera (DHC) equipped with 5/8-inch-thick NaI(Tl) crystals and parallel slit collimators and (b) a dedicated positron emission tomograph (PET) in a series of 28 patients with known or suspected malignancies. Twenty-eight patients with known or suspected malignancies underwent whole-body FDG PET imaging (Siemens, ECAT 933) after injection of approximately 10 mCi of ¹⁸F-FDG. FDG DHC images were then acquired for 30 min over the regions of interest using a dual-head gamma camera (VariCam, Elscint). The images were reconstructed in the normal mode, using photopeak/photopeak, photopeak/Compton, and Compton/photopeak coincidence events. FDG PET imaging found 45 lesions ranging in size from 1 cm to 7 cm in 28 patients. FDG DHC imaging detected 35/45 (78%) of these lesions. Among the ten lesions not seen with FDG DHC imaging, eight were less than 1.5 cm in size, and two were located centrally within the abdomen suffering from marked attenuation effects. The lesions were classified into three categories: thorax (n=24), liver (n=12), and extrahepatic abdominal (n=9). FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the thorax group and 78% of those below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 83%. FDG DHC imaging identified 100% of lesions above 1.5 cm, in the liver and 43% of lesions below 1.5 cm, for an overall total of 67%. FDG DHC imaging identified 78% of lesions above 1.5 cm in the extrahepatic abdominal group. There were no lesions below 1.5 cm in this group. FDG coincidence imaging using a dual-head gamma camera detected 90% of lesions greater than 1.5 cm. These data suggest that DHC imaging can be used clinically in well-defined diagnostic situations to differentiate benign from malignant lesions. Received 6 August and in revised form 27 November 1998     

Value of iterative reconstruction, attenuation correction, and image fusion in the interpretation of FDG PET images with an integrated dual-head coincidence camera and X-ray-based attenuation maps

PURPOSE: To compare lesion detectability on 2-[fluorine-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomographic (PET) images obtained with a dual-head coincidence (DHC) gamma camera equipped with an integrated x-ray tube-based transmission system (a) with images reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and those reconstructed with an iterative reconstruction algorithm based on coincidence-ordered subsets expectation maximization (COSEM), (b) with images reconstructed without and with attenuation correction (AC), and (c) with images reconstructed without and with image fusion for anatomic mapping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients known or suspected to have malignancy underwent initial imaging with a dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) unit after injection of 10 mCi (370 MBq) of FDG. Transmission computed tomographic (CT) scans and FDG emission images were then obtained with the DHC camera. The proportion of lesions detected on the various sets of FDG DHC images was determined by using FDG PET as the standard of reference. Imaging findings were correlated with those from histologic examination and clinical follow-up, in consultation with the respective referring physicians. RESULTS: FDG PET depicted 78 lesions, 29 of which were equal to or less than 1.5 cm in diameter. FDG DHC depicted 52 of the 78 (67%), 59 of 78 (76%), and 61 of the 78 (78%) lesions, respectively, when image reconstruction was performed with FBP without AC, COSEM without AC, and both COSEM and AC. The detection rate of lesions 1.5 cm or smaller was better with COSEM and AC than with FBP (55% vs 34%, respectively). In addition, COSEM and AC allowed more confidence in the interpretation. None of these differences, however, were significant. Fusion of CT scans and FDG DHC images obtained with COSEM and AC allowed localization of lesions to the skeleton in three patients and to the liver versus adjacent bowel in three patients. Image fusion was especially helpful for localizing lesions in the neck in five patients. Anatomic mapping on fusion images was clinically relevant in 11 patients (31%). CONCLUSION: The COSEM reconstruction algorithm should replace FBP when available. Functional anatomic mapping improved lesion localization in one-third of the patients studied.     

Comparative impact of standard approach, FDG PET and FDG dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging in preoperative staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer

We prospectively compared the impact of the standard approach, of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) and of FDG dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging (DHC) in preoperative staging of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In addition to traditional staging, 42 patients were studied with a PET system and a DHC system. The number of lesions detected on DHC and on PET were compared independently of the proof of a tumoural invasion. Then, for the sub-group of lesions with the proof of a tumoural invasion, the sensitivity of the different imaging modalities was compared. Finally, stagings were compared with final staging established by histopathological findings (n=28), additional imaging modalities (n=4), clinical and traditional imaging follow-up over at least 4 months. DHC detected 105 of the 145 lesions considered as pathological on PET (73%, P=0.01), with a concurrence of 89% (NS) in lesions larger than 1.5 cm, and only 17% (P=0.03) in those smaller or equal to 1 cm. Traditional staging detected 87 of the 114 verified tumoural lesions (76%), PET 110/114 (96%, P=0.01 vs traditional staging), DHC 88/114 (77%, NS vs traditional staging, P=0.01 vs PET). PET correctly predicted the N stage in 39/42 (93%) patients, DHC in 38/42 (90%), and computed tomography in 32/42 (76%). PET correctly predicted the M stage in 42/42 (100%) patients, DHC in 41/42 (98%), and traditional staging in 38/42 (90%). Identical NM staging was obtained with DHC and PET in 38/42 (90%) patients. Compared to traditional NM staging, PET correctly up-staged 9/42 (21%) patients and down-staged 3/42 (7%), with one additional false N up-staging. DHC correctly up-staged 7/42 (17%) patients and down-staged 3/42 (7%), with one additional false N down-staging. PET correctly reclassified 4/42 (9.5%) patients from resectable to unresectable and incorrectly reclassified one. DHC correctly reclassified 3/42 (7%) patients without false therapeutic reclassification. Although DHC detected fewer lesions than PET, DHC is a possible alternative to PET since the impact on staging was high as compared with traditional staging and was very similar to that of PET.     

18F-FDG for the staging of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer: Comparison of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with dedicated PET

Coincidence imaging with a dual-head gamma camera may offer a cost-effective alternative to dedicated PET. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of coincidence imaging and PET in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. Thirty-one patients were studied after thyroidectomy and radioiodine ablation. They were injected with a single dose of 300 MBq 18F-FDG. Scanning was performed on a dedicated PET system after 1 hr, and on a coincidence gamma camera after 4 hrs. Based on a lesion-by-lesion comparison, coincidence imaging and PET concurred in 69% of 118 lesions. Based on lesion size, concurrence was 96% in lesions larger than 1.5 cm, and 62% in those between 1 and 1.5 cm. Lesions smaller than 1 cm could not be identified with coincidence imaging. Identical staging was obtained with coincidence imaging and PET in 26/31 patients (84%). In four patients FDG accumulating lesions were shown by both the coincidence camera and the dedicated scanner, but not detectable with any other imaging means and were confirmed histologically on surgery. Although a coincidence camera is technically inferior to a dedicated PET scanner, it may provide clinically useful results in situations were a lesion of sufficient size and FDG uptake is to be expected, e.g. when evaluating a known lesion for malignancy.     

Usefulness of dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick nal crystals for nuclear oncology: Comparison with dedicated PET camera and conventional gamma camera with thin NaI crystals

AIM: A comparative study of the images obtained with a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals (19 mm), a dedicated PET camera with BGO crystals and a conventional gamma camera with thin NaI crystals (9.5 mm) was conducted to clarify the clinical feasibility of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals. METHODS: FDG images of 27 patients with malignant tumors were obtained by means of a dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystal and a dedicated PET camera with BGO crystals. The images of bone scintigraphy in 10 cancer patients obtained with the dual-head coincidence gamma camera were compared with those taken by a conventional dual-head gamma camera with thin NaI crystals. RESULTS: Patient-basis sensitivity in 27 patients with neoplasms and lesion-basis sensitivity of the dual-head coincidence gamma camera and the dedicated PET camera were 74.1% and 85.2% (n.s.), 66.7% and 72.2% (n.s.), respectively. The tumor to background FDG uptake ratio derived from the coincidence gamma camera was significantly lower than that derived from the dedicated PET camera (mean +/- s.d.; 3.48 +/- 3.77 vs. 8.12 +/- 8.92, p < 0.0001), but the tumor to background FDG uptake ratio obtained with both methods correlated well (r = 0.84, p < 0.001). Similar whole body bone scans were obtained with the dual-head coincidence gamma camera and the conventional dual-head gamma camera in all 10 patients. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the dual-head coincidence gamma camera with thick NaI crystals has potentially high clinical applicability for community hospitals.     

Oncological diagnosis using positron coincidence gamma camera with fluorodeoxyglucose in comparison with dedicated PET

The purpose of this study was to compare the utility of a dual-head positron coincidence detection gamma camera (PCD) with that of dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) in the imaging of various malignancies using (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG). 25 patients with known or suspected malignancies at various sites underwent imaging with both methods, and diagnostic performance on a lesion basis was compared. Tumour lesions were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively using the ratio of tumour-to-background counts (T/B ratio). FDG PCD and FDG PET visually detected 34 (72.3%) lesions and 37 (78.7%) lesions, respectively. The mean T/B ratio and standard deviation (SD) of FDG PCD was 3.5+/-3.3, significantly lower than that of FDG PET (8.4+/-7.1, p<0.001). When tumour lesions were less than 2.0 cm in diameter, the sensitivity of FDG PCD was 37.5%, significantly inferior to that of FDG PET (50.0%, p<0.01). Sensitivity between FDG PCD and FDG PET in lesions of more than 2.0 cm diameter showed no statistically significant difference. This study indicates that FDG imaging with a dual-head coincidence detection gamma camera can provide suitable diagnostic performance for lesions greater than 2.0 cm diameter, but performed significantly worse than dedicated PET for lesions smaller than this.     

The clinical usefulness of F-18 FDG coincidence PET without attenuation correction and without whole-body scanning mode in pulmonary lesions comparison with CT, MRI, and clinical findings

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to assess the clinical usefulness of fluorine-18 flurodeoxyglucose (F-18 FDG) coincidence detection (CoDe) positron emission tomography (PET) of various lung lesions by comparing it with CT, MRI, and clinical findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-two patients with pulmonary lesions underwent CoDe PET using a dual-head gamma camera equipped with a 5/8 inch thick NaI (Tl) crystals. The patients were prepared for the study by overnight fasting. Data was acquired at approximately 1 hour after the intravenous injection of 111 to 370 MBq (3 to 10 mCi) of F-18 FDG. A spinal scan of the thorax was performed using a slip ring gantry for 30 minutes. After rebinning, routine tomographic slices were reconstructed without attenuation correction and the images were analyzed visually. RESULTS: Pathologic diagnoses and staging were obtained at surgery in nine patients; in the remaining 33 patients, aspiration cytology was available. CoDe PET detected all 35 pathologically proved malignant lesions. In nine patients who underwent surgery, seven CoDe PET studies corresponded with pathologic staging, whereas in six of the nine patients, CT and MRI corresponded with the pathologic findings. Seven patients also had benign lesions that showed FDG uptake. CONCLUSIONS: F-18 FDG CoDe PET was sensitive in the evaluation of lung lesions but was not specific for malignancy. F-18 FDG CoDe PET was more sensitive than CT and MRI in nodal staging in the limited number of patients studied thus far.     

Detection of lung cancer with positron coincidence gamma camera using fluorodeoxyglucose in comparison with dedicated PET

OBJECTIVE: Dual-head gamma cameras with sodium iodide (NaI) detectors operated in coincidence mode provide a new approach for imaging with positron-labeled tracers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of FDG imaging with positron coincidence detection gamma camera (PCD) in detecting lung tumor in comparison with FDG imaging with the dedicated positron emission tomography (PET). METHODS AND MATERIAL: Twenty-six lesions of 13 patients with suspected lung cancer were studied with both FDG PET and FDG PCD on the same day. Pulmonary lesions were analyzed visually and semi-quantitatively using the ratio of target-to-background counts (T/B ratio). RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: FDG PCD and FDG PET could detect visually 21 lesions (80.8%) and 23 lesions (88.0%), respectively. The mean T/B ratio and standard deviation (S.D.) of FDG PCD was 4.6 +/- 3.9, significantly lower than that of FDG PET (11.4 +/- 6.6, P<0.001). When pulmonary lesions were no more than 2.0 cm in diameter, the sensitivity of FDG PCD was 37.5%, significantly inferior to that of FDG PET (62.5%, P<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference of the sensitivity between the FDG PCD and FDG PET in lesions of more than 2.0 cm in diameter. FDG PCD with uniform attenuation correction was clinically available in detecting lung cancer. However, the sensitivity for small lesions less than 2.0 cm was limited. The application of measured attenuation correction and scatter correction may to be needed to improve the detectability of FDG PCD, especially for detecting small lung cancer.     

Image fusion using an integrated, dual-head coincidence camera with X-ray tube-based attenuation maps.

The purpose of this study was to characterize a dual-head gamma camera capable of FDG imaging using coincidence detection and equipped with an integrated x-ray transmission system for attenuation correction, anatomic mapping, and image fusion. METHODS: Radiation dose (425 mrads skin dose) and tissue contrast (0.7% deviation from expected values) were assessed for the x-ray system. Registration of transmission and emission scans was validated using a hot sphere phantom and was verified in selected patient studies. RESULTS: Fusion of anatomic maps and FDG images allowed precise anatomic localization of lesions identified using dual-head coincidence imaging. CONCLUSION: The combined approach of x-ray attenuation, anatomic mapping, and image fusion with scintigraphic studies provides a new diagnostic tool for nuclear medicine and fertile ground for future research.     

Imaging of malignant lymphomas with F-18 FDG coincidence detection positron emission tomography

PURPOSE: The authors evaluated the utility of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) coincidence detection (CoDe) positron emission tomography (PET) for staging, post-treatment evaluation, and follow-up assessment of patients with malignant lymphomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with histologically proved malignant lymphomas (4 Hodgkin's disease, 54 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma) underwent CoDe PET using F-18 FDG. CoDe PET was performed using a dual-head gamma camera equipped with coincidence detection circuitry. Of the 87 CoDe PET studies, 26 were performed for staging, 38 for post-treatment evaluation, and 23 for follow-up evaluation of recurrence. The entire trunk, from the cervical to the inguinal regions, or selected regions were scanned with the patient in the supine position. No attenuation correction was made and reconstruction was performed using filtered back-projection rather than iterative reconstruction. CoDe PET findings were compared with corresponding results of computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), tissue biopsy, or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: For staging, 52 sites were positive on CoDe PET or CT-MRI. CoDe PET detected 49 sites (94%), and CT-MRI showed 47 sites (90%). CoDe PET detected five more lymphomatous lesions and missed three lesions. For post-treatment evaluation, CoDe PET showed a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 83%, but the validated cases numbered only 11. For follow-up for recurrence, CoDe PET had a negative predictive value of 90%, but frequent false-positive findings were noted in the head and neck region as a result of underlying inflammatory changes. CONCLUSIONS: For staging, FDG CoDe PET alone without attenuation correction is not sensitive enough to be used as an independent imaging method, especially for small abdominal lesions. However, it appears to be an accurate method for assessing residual disease and for patient follow-up.     

Gamma camera coincidence imaging with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose in the pretreatment evaluation of patients with oesophageal cancer

This study investigated the role of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) dual-head gamma camera coincidence imaging (GCI) in the pretreatment evaluation of patients with oesophageal cancer. Twenty-two patients (20 men; mean age, 64 years) with untreated, biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus underwent positron emission tomography (PET) and GCI 1 and 3 h after a single injection of FDG, respectively. Computed tomography (CT) was performed within 2 weeks of the FDG imaging. The sensitivity of lesion detection was compared between GCI and PET. Regional (N) and distant (M) metastases detected by GCI were evaluated with reference to PET and CT. The staging obtained by each modality was also compared with pathological staging in nine patients who underwent surgery. FDG PET detected 22 primary tumours, 34 metastatic lymph nodes and four organ metastases. Of them, GCI detected all primary tumours, 24 (71%) metastatic lymph nodes, and none of the organ metastases. Lymph nodes missed by GCI were smaller in size and the majority of them were located in the thoracic region. GCI provided N and M staging identical to CT and PET in eight patients and improved staging over CT in four patients. On the other hand, GCI missed metastases detected by both PET and CT in five patients. The addition of GCI to CT could improve detection of patients with metastasis to 82% (18/22) compared with 64% (14/22) detected by CT alone. In patients with pathological staging (n = 9), GCI could influence management changes in two patients (22%). In conclusion, FDG GCI has a role that is complementary to CT in the initial staging of patients with oesophageal cancer, and due to the additional detection of nodal metastasis, GCI can provide staging information, which may influence changes in management.     

Attenuation correction for cardiac dual-head gamma camera coincidence imaging using segmented myocardial perfusion SPECT.

The diagnostic accuracy of cardiac FDG imaging obtained with the dual-head coincidence gamma camera (DHC) is impaired by artifacts induced by nonuniform attenuation. This study proposed a new method (registration and segmentation method for attenuation correction [AC-RS]) to correct these attenuations in the chest region without the need for additional hardware or expensive transmission scanning equipment. METHODS: Before DHC imaging, 99mTc-tetrofosmin SPECT was performed using dual-energy acquisition from both the photopeak and Compton scatter windows. The scatter window images of the 99mTc-tetrofosmin were then registered 3-dimensionally with the cardiac DHC images and segmented into anatomic regions to obtain body and lung contours by applying the optimal threshold method on localized histograms. Theoretic attenuation coefficient values were assigned to the corresponding anatomic regions, and the DHC emission images were reconstructed using these attenuation correction factors. The results were quantitatively evaluated by imaging a cardiac phantom filled with a uniform solution and placed in a chest phantom. Eight nondiabetic subjects were also examined using this technique, and the results were compared with those of measured attenuation-corrected PET images. RESULTS: Use of this technique in phantom and clinical studies decreased the degree of artifacts seen in the inferior wall activity and corrected the emission images. When the results were compared with those of PET scans, the regional relative counts of the uncorrected DHC scan did not correlate with the results of the PET scan. However, the regional relative counts of the AC-RS-corrected DHC scan exhibited a linear correlation with the results of the PET scan (r = 0.73; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Reasonably accurate attenuation-corrected cardiac DHC images can be obtained using AC-RS without the need for transmission scanning.     

Assessment of malignancy in pulmonary lesions: FDG dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging in association with serum tumor marker measurement.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the performance of dual-head coincidence gamma camera imaging using FDG in association with serum marker assays in identifying lung carcinoma in patients with abnormal findings on chest radiography. METHODS: A prospective evaluation of FDG imaging with coincidence detection emission tomography (CDET) using a dual-head gamma camera combined with the assessment of 3 sensitive serum markers of lung cancer (carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron specific enolase, and CYFRA 21-1) was performed on the same day on 58 consecutive patients with known or suspected lung malignancy. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were proven to have lung cancer, and 5 patients had benign lung disease. Coincidence imaging showed significantly increased FDG uptake in 49 of 53 patients with proven malignancy (sensitivity, 92.5%) and in 3 patients with benign disease. FDG imaging had negative findings in 4 patients with proven malignancy and 2 patients with benign disease. Serum tumor marker levels were elevated in 42 of 53 cancer patients (sensitivity, 79.2%) and normal in 11 patients with proven malignancy. Nine patients with proven malignancy had positive findings on FDG images and negative marker assays. Two patients with proven malignancy had negative findings on FDG images and positive marker assays. The positive predictive value for lung cancer was 94.2% for FDG alone and 97.6% for FDG in association with serum markers. CONCLUSION: In this study, FDG CDET imaging was a powerful tool for evaluating patients with lung lesions suggestive of malignancy. Although the determination of serum marker levels was less accurate than FDG imaging, positive FDG results found in association with positive markers significantly increased the likelihood of lung malignancy.     

The role of hybrid cameras in oncology

The rapid advances in imaging technologies are a challenge for nuclear medicine physicians, radiologists, and clinicians who must integrate these technologies for optimal patient care and outcome at minimal cost. Multiple indications for functional imaging using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) are now well accepted in the field of oncology, including differentiation of benign from malignant lesions, staging malignant lesions, detection of malignant recurrence, and monitoring therapy. The use of FDG imaging was first shown using dedicated positron emission tomography (PET) with multiple full rings of bismuth germanate detectors. Most manufacturers now have available hybrid gamma cameras capable of imaging conventional single-photon emitters, as well as positron emitters such as FDG. This new technology was developed to make FDG imaging more widely accessible, first using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with high-energy collimators, and then using dualhead coincidence (DHC) detection with multihead gamma cameras that improved spatial resolution. Most hybrid gamma cameras are now equipped with thicker NaI(TI) crystals to improve sensitivity. Technical developments are still evolving with correction for attenuation and new iterative reconstruction algorithms to improve the quality of the images. Users need to be familiar with the rapid developments of the technology as well as its limitations. Currently, one model of hybrid gamma camera is equipped with an integrated x-ray transmission system for attenuation correction, anatomic mapping, and image fusion. This powerful tool has promising clinical applications including intensity-modulated radiation therapy.     

Coincidence camera FDG imaging for the diagnosis of chronic orthopedic infections: a feasibility study

PURPOSE: Results of dedicated [(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) PET imaging in patients with suspected orthopedic infections are promising. This study evaluates the feasibility of dual-head gamma-camera coincidence (DHC) imaging in this population. METHOD: Twenty-four patients, referred for the confirmation or exclusion of orthopedic infection, were prospectively studied with consecutive FDG-dedicated PET and FDG DHC imaging. Images were read by two blinded readers experienced with FDG PET and compared with the final diagnosis, obtained by microbiologic proof in 11 patients and clinical follow-up of at least 9 months in 13 patients. RESULTS: Nine patients had osseous infection on final diagnosis. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy in this limited series were (Reader 1/Reader 2), respectively, 100/100, 86/86, and 92/92% for FDG-dedicated PET and 89/89, 100/93, and 96/92% for FDG DHC imaging. CONCLUSION: Despite lower image quality for FDG DHC imaging, results in this limited series were comparable with the results of FDG-dedicated PET. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of FDG DHC imaging in suspected chronic orthopedic infections in larger patient groups.     

The clinical value of 18F-FDG detection with a dual-head coincidence camera: a review

Positron emission tomography (PET) has evolved into a technique that can accurately determine the distribution of positron-emitting radionuclides. The addition of a coincidence detection mode to a standard dual-head detector system has resulted in the option of single-photon and annihilation coincidence detection. This new device for imaging fluorine-18 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG) accumulation in neoplasms became commercially available in 1994. Besides conventional low-energy imaging in the collimated single-photon mode, it offers a relatively inexpensive opportunity to perform uncollimated PET by switching to the coincidence acquisition mode. This review summarises the clinical value of ¹⁸F-FDG detection with a dual-head coincidence camera in oncology. The results are compared with the overall results obtained using dedicated PET scanners. With respect to head and neck tumours, ¹⁸F-FDG coincidence mode gamma camera imaging (CGI) yields results that are in agreement with those obtained with dedicated PET scanners. With regard to other malignancies, such as lung cancer, lymphoma and brain tumours, data in the literature are too scarce to draw any definite conclusions. In general, the results of ¹⁸F-FDG CGI in tumours >15 mm seem to be comparable to those obtained with dedicated PET scanners, whereas in tumours <15 mm, the relative sensitivity of ¹⁸F-FDG CGI is approximately 80%. Using attenuation correction, the diagnostic yield of ¹⁸F-FDG CGI may increase. However, further clinical investigation is required to definitely establish its value in staging primary disease, therapy monitoring and assessment of tumour recurrence in clinical oncology.     

Whole-body hybrid PET with 18F-FDG in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

PET with a double-head gamma camera (hybrid PET) is a new approach to tumor imaging with 18F-FDG. This study was conducted to clarify the feasibility of whole-body FDG hybrid PET in the staging of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) in comparison with PET with a dedicated camera (dedicated PET) and to compare the results of both FDG studies with those of CT and 67Ga scanning as conventional imaging studies (CIS). METHODS: Thirty patients with NHL were prospectively evaluated. The results of the imaging studies regarding detection of the sites involved and staging were compared with each other and with those of the reference standard based on the final overall clinical evaluation. RESULTS: Of the total of 206 sites, whole-body FDG hybrid PET and dedicated PET detected 159 sites (77.2%) and 179 sites (86.9%), respectively. Eighteen of the 20 sites missed by hybrid PET alone consisted of lesions < 1.5 cm. Both FDG studies provided concordant staging results in all but 2 patients. CIS, on the other hand, detected 164 (79.6%) of the 206 sites, 137 of which were also detected by hybrid PET. Hybrid PET detected an additional 22 sites not found by CIS, whereas CIS detected 27 additional sites. Hybrid PET and CIS provided concordant staging results in 19 patients. Hybrid PET correctly staged NHL in 5 additional patients, whereas CIS correctly staged NHL in only 1 additional patient. CONCLUSION: Whole-body FDG hybrid PET appeared to be an accurate method of staging NHL. Despite its poorer image quality compared with dedicated PET, hybrid PET provided NHL staging results comparable with those of dedicated PET. Hybrid PET also yielded results comparable with those of CIS. However, whole-body FDG hybrid PET is currently inadequate as a single modality for staging NHL and is complementary to CT.     

Assessment of myocardial viability with a positron coincidence gamma camera using fluorodeoxyglucose in comparison with dedicated PET

The use of dual-head gamma camera modified positron coincidence detection (PCD) is a new, alternative method of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) imaging. This study investigated the potential ability of evaluating myocardial viability in patients with ischaemic heart disease by FDG imaging using PCD. A total of 21 patients (18 male, three female; mean age 59.7+/-8.5 years) with a history of previous myocardial infarction and confirmed coronary angiography underwent FDG PCD and FDG PET after oral glucose loading (75 g). Quantitative analysis was compared between images of FDG PCD and FDG PET. A significant linear correlation between the segmental percentage of FDG uptake obtained by PCD and PET was observed (r=0.63, P<0.001). By receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, using FDG PET as the 'gold standard', at the 50% threshold value in PET, FDG PCD showed a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 63% in detecting myocardial viability. Regional analysis showed lower agreement of FDG PCD and FDG PET in the inferior (79%) and septal (70%) walls compared with the other walls. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial viability using FDG PCD yielded comparable clinical results in apex, anterior and lateral walls to that of FDG PET. However, the agreement was lower in the inferior and septal walls. Therefore, results of FDG PCD should be carefully interpreted in evaluating myocardial viability in the inferior and septal walls. The application of a measured attenuation correction and scatter correction are needed to improve the detectability of myocardial viability in FDG imaging by coincidence gamma camera.     

Comparison of dual-head coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging with FDG PET in detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis.

Dual-head coincidence gamma camera 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) imaging was compared with FDG PET in the detection of breast cancer and axillary lymph node metastasis. METHODS: Both coincidence gamma camera FDG imaging and FDG PET were performed in a cylindrical phantom containing spheres of different sizes and activity ratios (5:1, 10:1 and 15:1) and in 30 women (age range 32-78 y) with suspected breast cancer. Biopsies or mastectomies were performed in all patients. Images were visually assessed, and the count ratio between tumor and normal tissue (T/N ratio) was calculated. RESULTS: In the phantom studies, coincidence gamma camera imaging visualized the smallest sphere (1.0 cm) at a ratio of 15:1 but not at ratios of 5:1 and 10:1. Coincidence gamma camera imaging visualized the other spheres (> or =1.3 cm) at all ratios. PET visualized all spheres at all ratios. In the clinical studies, 22 of 26 breast carcinomas detected by PET were also detected by coincidence gamma camera imaging.. Coincidence gamma camera imaging detected all of the carcinomas > or =2 cm in diameter (n = 10) and 12 of 16 carcinomas <2 cm. In breast carcinomas detected by both PET and coincidence gamma camera imaging, the T/N ratio in non-attenuation-corrected PET (7.12 +/- 7.13) was significantly higher than in coincidence gamma camera imaging (2.90 +/- 1.47, P < 0.005). Four of 8 axillary lymph node metastases detected by PET were detected by coincidence gamma camera imaging. Of 9 axillary lymph node metastases <1.0 cm in diameter, 7 and 3 were detected by PET and coincidence gamma camera imaging, respectively. CONCLUSION: Coincidence gamma camera imaging is useful in detecting breast carcinoma > or =2 cm in diameter but is not reliable for breast carcinoma <2 cm in diameter. Coincidence gamma camera imaging may be useless or even dangerous in the detection of axillary lymph node metastasis.