Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Two Immunosuppressive Regimens, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil Versus Everolimus and Low-Dose Cyclosporine, in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: Results at 6 Months Follow-up

Objective

The aim of this study in renal transplant recipients was to compare a tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) immunosuppressive regimen with a combination of low dose of cyclosporine and everolimus.

Patients and Methods

Sixty consecutive patients were prospectively assigned to receive tacrolimus and MMF (TAC; n = 30) or everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine (EVL; n = 30). Tacrolimus was dosed seeking a trough blood level of 8 to 10 ng/mL by month 3 and 5 to 8 ng/mL thereafter. Everolimus was dosed seeking a trough blood level of 3 to 8 ng/mL by day 7. Cyclosporine was dosed aiming at a C2 blood level of 350 to 700 ng/mL in the first week and 150 to 400 ng/mL thereafter. All patients received induction with basiliximab and maintenance treatment with corticosteroids.

Results

At 6-months follow-up, patient survival rates (TAC 100% vs EVL 100%) and graft survival rates (TAC 96.7% vs EVL 93.3%) were not significantly different between the groups. Patients in the EVL group showed more acute rejection episodes, but serum creatinine concentrations and creatinine clearances were not significantly different from the TAC group. Among the observed side effects, hypercholesterolemia was significantly higher in the EVL group (total cholesterol: TAC 206 ± 38 vs EVL 250 ± 55 mg/dL; P < .003).

Conclusions

This study showed that the immunosuppressive association of tacrolimus and MMF produced similar acute rejection episodes, graft survivals, and renal function at 6 months after renal transplantation compared with an immunosuppressive combination of everolimus and low-dose cyclosporine. Dyslipidemia was significantly greater among patients who received everolimus.     

Ten‐year observational follow‐up of a randomized trial comparing cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy combined with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation

Although various strategies for steroid withdrawal after transplantation have been attempted, there are few reports of the long‐term results of steroid withdrawal regimens in kidney transplantation. Earlier, we reported on a 5‐year prospective, randomized, single‐center trial comparing the safety and efficacy of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with that of tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF, when steroids were withdrawn 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. We now report the 10‐year observational data on the study population. We collected data from the database of the Organ Transplantation Center, Samsung Medical Center for 5 years after completion of the original study (TAC group n = 62; CsA group n = 55). The 10‐year patient survival, death‐censored graft survival, and acute rejection‐free survival did not differ between groups (98% vs 96%; P = 0.49, 78% vs 85%; P = 0.75 and 84% vs 76%; P = 0.14 in the TAC group vs CsA group, respectively). In low‐risk patients, there was no difference in long‐term patient and graft survival between TAC‐ and CsA‐based late steroid withdrawal regimens that included MMF treatment. More long‐term randomized clinical trials are needed to clarify the benefits of late steroid withdrawal in kidney transplantation.     

Longitudinal growth on an everolimus‐ versus an MMF‐based steroid‐free immunosuppressive regimen in paediatric renal transplant recipients

Concerns have been raised that mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors in pediatric transplant recipients might interfere with longitudinal bone growth by inhibition of growth factor signaling and growth plate chondrocyte proliferation. We therefore undertook a prospective nested, case‐control study on longitudinal growth over 2 years in steroid‐free pediatric renal transplant recipients. Fourteen patients on a steroid‐free maintenance immunosuppressive regimen consisting of low‐dose everolimus (EVR) in conjunction with low‐dose cyclosporine (CsA) were compared to a matched cohort of 14 steroid‐free patients on a standard dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) regimen in conjunction with a standard dose calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). The mean change in height standard deviation (SD) score in the first study year was 0.31 ± 0.71 SD score in the EVR group compared to 0.31 ± 0.64 SD score in the MMF group (P = 0.20). For the entire study period of 2 years, the change in height SD score in the EVR group was 0.43 ± 0.81 SDS compared to 0.75 ± 0.85 SDS in the MMF group (P = 0.32). The percentage of prepubertal patients experiencing catch‐up growth, defined as an increase in height SD score ≥0.5 in 2 years, was similar in the EVR group (5/8, 65%) and the MMF group (6/8, 75%; P = 1.00). Longitudinal growth over 2 years in steroid‐free pediatric patients on low‐dose EVR and CsA is not different to that of a matched steroid‐free control group on an immunosuppressive regimen with standard‐dose CNI and MMF. Hence, low‐dose EVR does not appear to negatively impact short‐term growth in pediatric renal transplant recipients.     

Randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of everolimus and low‐exposure tacrolimus on graft outcomes in kidney transplant recipients

This was a single‐center, randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of a 3‐month (10‐16 weeks) conversion to everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus, as compared to remaining on full exposure tacrolimus with mycophenolate (NCT 02096107). Adult kidney transplant recipients with a functioning graft were eligible for participation. Goal troughs in the intervention arm were 2‐5 ng/mL for tacrolimus and 3‐8 ng/mL for everolimus, with tacrolimus maintained at 5‐12 ng/mL in the control arm; 60 were randomized (30 in each arm) and were well matched at baseline; mean age was 51 years and 57% were African‐American. At 12‐months, fibrosis scores (27.8% tacrolimus/mycophenolate vs 22.9% tacrolimus/everolimus, P = .391), acute rejection rates (7% tacrolimus/mycophenolate vs 3% tacrolimus/everolimus, P = .554), and graft function (mean eGFR tacrolimus/mycophenolate 56 ± 15 vs tacrolimus/everolimus 59 ± 14 mL/min/1.73 m², P = .465) were similar between arms. The everolimus arm had significantly lower rates of CMV infection, severe BK infection, and improved BK viral clearance kinetics, as compared to the MPA arm. In this population, including a significant number of African‐Americans, an immunosuppression regimen of everolimus with low‐exposure tacrolimus provided similar efficacy to tacrolimus and mycophenolate, with significantly lower rates of BK and CMV.     

Randomized trial of cyclosporine and tacrolimus therapy with steroid withdrawal in living‐donor renal transplantation: 5‐year follow‐up

The aim of this study was to compare the long‐term safety and efficacy of immunosuppressive regimens consisting of cyclosporine (CsA) plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or tacrolimus (TAC) plus MMF after steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation in low‐risk patients. One hundred and thirty‐one patients were randomized to receive either CsA (n = 63) or TAC (n = 68). Of these, 117 patients satisfied the criteria for steroid withdrawal (no biopsy‐proven rejection episode and serum creatinine level <2.0 mg/dl 6 months after transplantation). Fifty‐five recipients were of the CsA group, and 62 were of the TAC group. The 5‐year graft survival rate did not differ between groups (90.5% vs. 93.3% respectively; P = 0.55). The cumulative incidence of acute rejection 5 years after transplantation was 16.4% and 8.1% for the CsA and TAC groups respectively (P = 0.15). Post‐transplantation diabetes mellitus was more frequent in the TAC group than in the CsA group (P = 0.05), but the incidence of other side‐effects did not differ between groups. In conclusion, CsA‐ and TAC‐based regimens in conjunction with MMF have similar patient‐ and graft survival rates in low‐risk patients who underwent steroid withdrawal 6 months after kidney transplantation.     

Long‐term dosing patterns of enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil with tacrolimus after renal transplantation

MORE was a four‐yr, prospective, observational study at 40 transplant centers in the US. Data were analyzed to evaluate changes in mycophenolic acid (MPA) dosing over time in 904 de novo kidney transplant recipients receiving enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS, n = 616) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, n = 288) with tacrolimus. Induction therapy and steroid treatment were similar in the two subpopulations. The proportion of patients receiving the maximal recommended MPA dose was 80.5%, 43.9%, 39.2%, 34.6%, and 30.1% at baseline and years 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. More patients received the maximal recommended MPA dose with EC‐MPS vs. MMF at month 1 (79.2% vs. 71.7%, p = 0.016), month 3 (68.5% vs. 56.9%, p = 0.001), and month 6 (52.9% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.028). Multivariate analysis showed the risk of biopsy‐proven acute rejection, graft loss or death to be similar for EC‐MPS vs. MMF. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was similar with EC‐MPS vs. MMF at all time points. There were no significant differences in any category of adverse event between the EC‐MPS and MMF cohorts during follow‐up, including gastrointestinal events. In conclusion, MPA dose was maintained more effectively in the first six months after kidney transplantation using EC‐MPS vs. MMF, without an increase in adverse events.     

Long‐term outcomes in African American kidney transplant recipients under contemporary immunosuppression: a four‐yr analysis of the Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant (MORE) study

Mycophenolic acid Observational REnal transplant (MORE) was a prospective, observational study of de novo kidney transplant patients receiving mycophenolic acid (MPA). Four‐yr data on 904 patients receiving tacrolimus and enteric‐coated mycophenolate sodium (EC‐MPS) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) were analyzed to evaluate immunosuppression and graft outcomes in African American (AA, n = 218) vs. non‐AA (n = 686) patients. Mean tacrolimus dose was higher in AA vs. non‐AA patients but mean tacrolimus trough concentration was similar. Use of the recommended MPA dose in AA patients decreased from 78.9% at baseline to 33.1% at year 3. More AA patients received the recommended MPA dose with EC‐MPS than MMF at month 6 (56.2% vs. 35.7%, p = 0.016) and month 36 (46.6% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.029), with no safety penalty. Significantly, more AA patients received corticosteroids than non‐AA patients. Biopsy‐proven acute rejection was higher in AA vs. non‐AA patients (18.9% vs. 10.7%, p = 0.003), as was graft loss (10.9% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.003); differences were confirmed by Cox regression analysis. Patient survival was similar. Estimated GFR was comparable in AA vs. non‐AA patients. Kidney allograft survival remains lower for AA vs. non‐AA recipients even under the current standard of care.     

Everolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil in Heart Transplantation: A Randomized,Multicenter Trial

In an open‐label, 24‐month trial, 721 de novo heart transplant recipients were randomized to everolimus 1.5 mg or 3.0 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 3 g/day with standard‐dose cyclosporine (plus corticosteroids ± induction). Primary efficacy endpoint was the 12‐month composite incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection, acute rejection associated with hemodynamic compromise, graft loss/retransplant, death or loss to follow‐up. Everolimus 1.5 mg was noninferior to MMF for this endpoint at month 12 (35.1% vs. 33.6%; difference 1.5% [97.5% CI: –7.5%, 10.6%]) and month 24. Mortality to month 3 was higher with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF in patients receiving rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG) induction, mainly due to infection, but 24‐month mortality was similar (everolimus 1.5 mg 10.6% [30/282], MMF 9.2% [25/271]). Everolimus 3.0 mg was terminated prematurely due to higher mortality. The mean (SD) 12‐month increase in maximal intimal thickness was 0.03 (0.05) mm with everolimus 1.5 mg versus 0.07 (0.11) mm with MMF (p < 0.001). Everolimus 1.5 mg was inferior to MMF for renal function but comparable in patients achieving predefined reduced cyclosporine trough concentrations. Nonfatal serious adverse events were more frequent with everolimus 1.5 mg versus MMF. Everolimus 1.5 mg with reduced‐dose cyclosporine offers similar efficacy to MMF with standard‐dose cyclosporine and reduces intimal proliferation at 12 months in de novo heart transplant recipients.     

Long‐term outcomes after cyclosporine or mycophenolate withdrawal in kidney transplantation – results from an aborted trial

Long‐term triple immunosuppressive therapy with cyclosporine (CsA), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and prednisolone may be excessively powerful for many transplant recipients. We compared withdrawal of either MMF or CsA in stable kidney transplants on triple immunosuppression. The study was a prospective, randomized, controlled 12‐months trial in stable kidney transplants. The patients who withdrew CsA were given MMF 2 g/d, and CsA troughs were between 75 and 125 ng/mL in MMF withdrawal. Planned inclusion was 298 patients. The study was prematurely aborted after inclusion of 39 patients. Acute rejection rates were 6/20 (30%) in the MMF group compared with 0/19 (0%) in the CsA group (p = 0.02). Time to acute rejections was 4.0–28.7 months after withdrawal. Trough concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and CsA showed therapeutic levels. The subjects have been observed for eight yr, and of the 28 patients remaining on randomized therapy, the MMF patients preserved graft function better than CsA patients. Death‐censored graft survival was 75% and 95% (p = 0.18) and patient survival was 70% and 68% (p = 0.99) in the MMF and CsA groups, respectively, at the end of long‐term follow‐up. CsA withdrawal was associated with a high rate of acute rejections. Initially, the treatment of acute rejections was successful. However, five of six lost their grafts in the long term.     

Prospective randomized study of conversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine A to improve glucose metabolism in patients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation

Tacrolimus (TAC) increases the risk of posttransplant diabetes (PTDM) compared with cyclosporine A (CYC). The present 12‐month, multicenter, investigator‐driven, prospective, randomized study was designed to assess whether conversion from tacrolimus to CYC can reverse PTDM after renal transplantation. Predominantly white patients with PTDM according to the 2005 American Diabetes Association criteria were randomized to either replacement of TAC with CYC or continuation of their TAC‐based regimen after stratification for type of glucose‐lowering therapy, steroid therapy, and hepatitis C status. At 12 months, 14 of 41 patients with complete data in the CYC arm (34%; 95%CI 19%‐49%) were free of diabetes, whereas this was the case in only 4 of 39 patients (10%; 95%CI 3%‐20%) in the TAC arm (P = .01). At 12 months, 39% of patients in the CYC arm were off glucose‐lowering medication vs 13% of patients in the TAC arm (P = .01). The CYC group decreased glycated hemoglobin level during the 12‐month follow‐up, resulting in significantly lower levels compared with the TAC group (6.0 ± 0.9% vs 7.1 ± 1.7% at 12 months; P = .002). In conclusion, replacement of TAC with CYC significantly improves glucose metabolism and has the potential to reverse diabetes during the first year after conversion. (EU Clinical Trials Register No. 2006‐001765‐42)     

A Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Early Steroid Withdrawal on Growth in Pediatric Renal Transplantation: The TWIST Study

Minimizing steroid exposure in pediatric renal transplant recipients can improve linear growth and reduce metabolic disorders. This randomized multicenter study investigated the impact of early steroid withdrawal on mean change in height standard deviation score (SDS) and the safety and efficacy of two immunosuppressive regimens during the first 6 months after transplantation. Children received tacrolimus, MMF, two doses of daclizumab and steroids until day 4 (TAC/MMF/DAC, n = 98) or tacrolimus, MMF and standard‐dose steroids (TAC/MMF/STR, n = 98). Mean change in height SDS was 0.16 ± 0.32 with TAC/MMF/DAC and 0.03 ± 0.32 with TAC/MMF/STR. The mean treatment group difference was 0.13 (p < 0.005 [95% CI 0.04–0.22]), 0.21 in prepubertal (p = 0.009 [95% CI 0.05–0.36]) and 0.05 in pubertal children (p = ns). Frequency of biopsy‐proven acute rejection was 10.2%, TAC/MMF/DAC, and 7.1%, TAC/MMF/STR. Patient and graft survival and renal function were similar. Significantly greater reductions in total cholesterol and triglycerides but significantly higher incidences of infection and anemia were found with TAC/MMF/DAC (p < 0.05 all comparisons). Early steroid withdrawal significantly aided growth at 6 months more so in prepubertal than pubertal children. This was accompanied by significantly better lipid and glucose metabolism profiles without increases in graft rejection or loss.     

Efficacy and safety of bleselumab in kidney transplant recipients: A phase 2, randomized,open‐label,noninferiority study

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the anti‐CD40 monoclonal antibody bleselumab (ASKP1240) in de novo kidney transplant recipients over 36 months posttransplant. Transplant recipients were randomized (1:1:1) to standard of care (SoC: 0.1 mg/kg per day immediate‐release tacrolimus [IR‐TAC]; target minimum blood concentration [C_trough] 4‐11 ng/mL plus 1 g mycophenolate mofetil [MMF] twice daily) or bleselumab (200 mg on days 0/7/14/28/42/56/70/90, and monthly thereafter) plus either MMF or IR‐TAC (0.1 mg/kg per day; target C_trough 4‐11 ng/mL days 0‐30, then 2‐5 ng/mL). All received basiliximab induction (20 mg pretransplant and on days 3‐5 posttransplant) and corticosteroids. One hundred thirty‐eight transplant recipients received ≥1 dose of study drug (SoC [n = 48]; bleselumab + MMF [n = 46]; bleselumab + IR‐TAC [n = 44]). For the primary endpoint (incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection [BPAR] at 6 months), bleselumab + IR‐TAC was noninferior to SoC (difference 2.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI] ?8.1% to 13.8%), and bleselumab + MMF did not demonstrate noninferiority to SoC (difference 30.7%; 95% CI 15.2%‐46.2%). BPAR incidence slightly increased through month 36 in all groups, with bleselumab + IR‐TAC continuing to demonstrate noninferiority to SoC. Bleselumab had a favorable benefit–risk ratio. Most treatment‐emergent adverse events were as expected for kidney transplant recipients (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01780844).     

Tacrolimus and mycophenolate regimen and subclinical tubulo‐interstitial inflammation in low immunological risk renal transplants

The aim was to evaluate the relationship between maintenance immunosuppression, subclinical tubulo‐interstitial inflammation and interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IF/TA) in surveillance biopsies performed in low immunological risk renal transplants at two transplant centers. The Barcelona cohort consisted of 109 early and 66 late biopsies in patients receiving high tacrolimus (TAC‐C₀ target at 1‐year 6–10 ng/ml) and reduced MMF dose (500 mg bid at 1‐year). The Oslo cohort consisted of 262 early and 237 late biopsies performed in patients treated with low TAC‐C₀ (target 3–7 ng/ml) and standard MMF dose (750 mg bid). Subclinical inflammation, adjusted for confounders, was associated with low TAC‐C₀ in the early (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.61–0.92; P = 0.006) and late biopsies (OR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.50–0.95; P = 0.023) from Barcelona. In the Oslo cohort, it was associated with low MMF in early biopsies (OR: 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.98; P = 0.0101) and with low TAC‐C₀ in late biopsies (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.61–0.97; P = 0.0286). MMF dose was significantly reduced in Oslo between early and late biopsies. IF/TA was not associated with TAC‐C₀ or MMF dose in the multivariate analysis. Our data suggest that in TAC‐ and MMF‐based regimens, TAC‐C₀ levels are associated with subclinical inflammation in patients receiving reduced MMF dose.     

Tacrolimus with Mycophenolate Mofetil (MMF) or Sirolimus vs. Cyclosporine with MMF in Cardiac Transplant Patients: 1-Year Report

The most advantageous combination of immunosuppressive agents for cardiac transplant recipients has not yet been established. Between November 2001 and June 2003, 343 de novo cardiac transplant recipients were randomized to receive steroids and either tacrolimus (TAC) + sirolimus (SRL), TAC + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclosporine (CYA) + MMF. Antilymphocyte induction therapy was allowed for up to 5 days. The primary endpoint of >/=3A rejection or hemodynamic compromise rejection requiring treatment showed no significant difference at 6 months (TAC/MMF 22.4%, TAC/SRL 24.3%, CYA/MMF 31.6%, p = 0.271) and 1 year (p = 0.056), but it was significantly lower in the TAC/MMF group when compared only to the CYA/MMF group at 1 year (23.4% vs. 36.8%; p = 0.029). Differences in the incidence of any treated rejection were significant (TAC/SRL = 35%, TAC/MMF = 42%, CYA/MMF = 59%; p < 0.001), as were median levels of serum creatinine (TAC/SRL = 1.5 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 1.3 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 1.5 mg/dL; p = 0.032) and triglycerides (TAC/SRL = 162 mg/dL, TAC/MMF = 126 mg/dL, CYA/MMF = 154 mg/dL; p = 0.028). The TAC/SRL group encountered fewer viral infections but more fungal infections and impaired wound healing. These secondary endpoints suggest that the TAC/MMF combination appears to offer more advantages than TAC/SRL or CYA/MMF in cardiac transplant patients, including fewer >/=3A rejections or hemodynamic compromise rejections and an improved side-effect profile.     

Systemic influence of immunosuppressive drugs on small and large bowel transport and barrier function

Immunosuppressive drug (ISD)‐associated gastrointestinal disorders are a relevant risk factor for graft loss or patient death. The pathomechanisms and the incidence of post‐transplantation diarrhea remain to be fully understood. The aim of this study was to characterize the impact of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), enteric coated mycophenolic acid (EC‐MPA), sirolimus, everolimus (EVE) and fingolimod (FTY 720) on small and large bowel transport and barrier function. Functions of the small bowel and distal colon of Wistar rats treated for 14 days with one of the drug were analyzed using Ussing chamber method. In detail, the glucose and sodium absorption, chloride secretion, and barrier function were compared. Bowel functions were investigated by inhibition or activation of the electrogenic epithelial transport, as well as by measuring transepithelial H³‐lactulose flux. TAC altered glucose absorption; EVE glucose absorption, small bowel barrier function and chloride secretion; MMF small bowel barrier function; and EC‐MPA glucose absorption and the small bowel barrier function. Drug effects were partially dose‐dependent. In conclusion, different ISD, such as TAC, EVE, MMF, or EC‐MPA lead to different and specific patterns of pathophysiologic changes of small and large bowel barrier and transport function.     

Randomized trial of 3 maintenance regimens (TAC/SRL vs. TAC/MMF vs. CSA/SRL) with low-dose corticosteroids in primary kidney transplantation: 18-year results

A randomized trial of 150 primary kidney transplant recipients, initiated in May 2000, compared tacrolimus (TAC)/sirolimus (SRL) vs. TAC/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) vs. cyclosporine microemulsion (CSA)/SRL (N = 50/group). All patients received daclizumab induction and maintenance corticosteroids. With current median follow-up of 18 years post-transplant, biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) occurred less often in TAC/MMF (26% (13/50)), vs. the TAC/SRL (36% (18/50)) and CSA/SRL (34% (17/50)) arms combined (p = .23), with statistical significance favoring TAC/MMF (p = .05) after controlling for the multivariable (Cox model) effects of recipient age, recipient race/ethnicity, and donor age. First BPAR rate was clearly more favorable for TAC/MMF after stratifying patients by having 0–1 (N = 72) vs. 2–3 (N = 78) unfavorable baseline characteristics (recipient age <50 years, African American or Hispanic recipient, and donor age ≥50 years) (p = .02). Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), using the CKD-EPI formula, was consistently higher for TAC/MMF, particularly after controlling for the multivariable effect of donor age, throughout the first 96 months post-transplant (p ≤ .008). These differences were translated into an observed more favorable graft failure due to immunologic cause (CAI/TG) rate for TAC/MMF (p = .06), although no significant differences in overall death-uncensored graft loss were observed. Previously reported significantly higher study drug discontinuation and requirement for antilipid therapy rates in the SRL-assigned arms were maintained over time. Overall, these results at 18 years post-transplant more definitively show that TAC/MMF should be the gold standard for achieving optimal, long-term maintenance immunosuppression in kidney transplantation.     

Improved outcomes using G‐CSF‐mobilized blood and bone marrow grafts as the source of stem cells compared with G‐PB after HLA‐identical sibling transplantation in patients with acute leukemia

This retrospective study compared the transplantation outcomes of 98 consecutive patients with acute leukemia. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was performed using G‐CSF‐mobilized bone marrow and blood (G‐BM&PB) or G‐CSF‐mobilized peripheral blood (G‐PB) from HLA‐identical sibling donors. The G‐BM&PB and G‐PB groups displayed significantly different neutrophil recovery rates (medians of 15 vs. 14 d, respectively; p = 0.009) but similar platelet recovery rates. The cumulative incidences of grades II–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease (aGVHD) in the G‐BM&PB and G‐PB cohorts were similar (16.2 ± 4.7% vs. 21.8 ± 7.4%, respectively; p = 0.676), but the incidences of grades III‐IV aGVHD were significantly different (5.5 ± 3.1% vs. 18.9 ± 7.1%, respectively; p = 0.042). The G‐BM&PB and G‐PB cohorts displayed similar cumulative incidences of chronic GVHD (cGVHD, 49.1 ± 5.7% vs. 42.7 ± 6.8%, respectively; p = 0.465), one‐yr cumulative incidences of treatment‐related mortality (16.5 ± 3.5% vs. 24.4 ± 4.1%, respectively; p = 0.220), and five‐yr cumulative incidences of relapse (13.9 ± 4.8% vs. 26.8 ± 7.2%, respectively; p = 0.113). The five‐yr probability of leukemia‐free survival (LFS) was significantly higher in the G‐BM&PB group than in the G‐PB group (77.8 ± 5.2% vs. 57.6 ± 8.6%, respectively; p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis identified G‐PB as an independent risk factor for grades III‐IV aGVHD and LFS. Our results suggest that HLA‐identical transplantation with G‐BM&PB results in superior clinical outcomes compared with G‐PB for patients with acute leukemia.     

Heart transplantation under cyclosporine or tacrolimus combined with mycophenolate mofetil or everolimus

Objective

In this study, we examined whether cyclosporine was effective when combined with everolimus in clinical heart transplantation (HT).

Patients and Methods

From August 2004 to July 2007, 108 adult patients underwent primary HT. The main exclusion criteria were: donors >60 years; cold ischemia times >6 hours; recipients of multiorgan transplantation or a previous transplantation; and panel-reactive antibodies ≥25%. The cyclosporine plus everolimus regimen (group CE, n = 32) was suggested first; upon refusal or if the recipient or donor was positive for hepatitis B surface antigen or PCR + hepatitis C infection, then patient was randomly assigned to success cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; group CM, n = 24) or tacrolimus plus MMF (group TM, n = 25). All patients underwent similar operative procedures and postoperative care with protocol endomyocardial biopsies.

Results

No 30-day mortality was noted in any group. The efficacy failure rates were 3%, 25%, and 16% in groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively (P = .04 between groups CE and CM). The 1-year survivals were 96.7% ± 18.1%, 89.7% ± 29.8%, and 81.0% ± 35.5% for groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively (P = .04 between groups CE and TM). The 3-year survival rates were 91.9% ± 28.3%, 79.8% ± 46.0%, and 81.0% ± 35.5% in groups CE, CM, and TM, respectively.

Conclusions

The 3 immunosuppressive regimens offered good efficacy after HT. The cyclosporine plus everolimus regimen showed a significantly better result with less efficacy failure (compared with cyclosporine plus MMF: 3% vs 25%) and better 1-year survival compared with tacrolimus plus MMF: 96.7% vs 81.0%.     

Efficacy and Safety of Everolimus Plus Low‐Dose Tacrolimus Versus Mycophenolate Mofetil Plus Standard‐Dose Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant Recipients: 12‐Month Data

In this 12‐month, multicenter, randomized, open‐label, noninferiority study, de novo renal transplant recipients (RTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive everolimus plus low‐dose tacrolimus (EVR+LTac) or mycophenolate mofetil plus standard‐dose Tac (MMF+STac) with induction therapy (basiliximab or rabbit anti‐thymocyte globulin). Noninferiority of composite efficacy failure rate (treated biopsy‐proven acute rejection [tBPAR]/graft loss/death/loss to follow‐up) in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac was missed by 1.4%, considering the noninferiority margin of 10% (24.6% vs. 20.4%; 4.2% [?3.0, 11.4]). Incidence of tBPAR (19.1% vs. 11.2%; p < 0.05) was significantly higher, while graft loss (1.3% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.05) and composite of graft loss/death/lost to follow‐up (6.1% vs. 10.5%, p = 0.05) were significantly lower in EVR+LTac versus MMF+STac groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was similar between EVR+LTac and MMF+STac groups (63.1 [22.0] vs. 63.1 [19.5] mL/min/1.73 m²) and safety was comparable. In conclusion, EVR+LTac missed noninferiority versus MMF+STac based on the 10% noninferiority margin. Further studies evaluating optimal immunosuppression for improved efficacy will guide appropriate dosing and target levels of EVR and LTac in RTxRs.     

Long‐term follow‐up of immunosuppressive monotherapy in liver transplantation: tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin

Cholongitas E, Shusang V, Germani G, Tsochatzis E, Raimondo ML, Marelli L, Senzolo M, Davidson BR, Patch D, Rolles K, Burroughs AK. Long‐term follow‐up of immunosuppressive monotherapy in liver transplantation: tacrolimus and microemulsified cyclosporin.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 614–624. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: Early withdrawal of steroids after liver transplantation has benefits, but rarely is total avoidance of steroids used. We evaluated long‐term results of patients with ab initio monotherapy with cyclosporin (CYA) vs. tacrolimus (TAC), in randomized and cohort studies. Methods: We evaluated long‐term outcomes in 66 adults randomized to TAC or CYA and 94 subsequent patients who received TAC. Protocol liver biopsies were performed. Rejection was treated with three 1 g/d methylprednisolone. Further rejection after two courses of methylprednisolone was defined as monotherapy failure. Results: Actuarial five‐yr survival was 68% in TAC and 70% CYA. Monotherapy failed in 8% TAC and 13% CYA patients; no rejection in 24% TAC and 19% CYA patients; 42% TAC and 33% CYA patients were not exposed to any steroids. Rejection episodes were less with TAC, compared to CYA: mean 1.8 vs. 2.5, p = 0.042. Chronic rejection occurred in only 4 (11%) CYA patients. During follow‐up of median 97 months (range: 0.06–145), there were 16 (44%) deaths in CYA and 48 (39%) in TAC patients (p > 0.05). Conclusions: TAC monotherapy ab initio is a viable immunosuppressive strategy in liver transplantation and was associated with lower rejection rates and renal complications, compared to CYA.