Survivorship Care Planning in Colorectal Cancer: Feedback from Survivors & Providers

The Institute of Medicine recommended that all patients receive survivorship care plans (SCPs) post-treatment to improve quality of follow-up care. However, little is known regarding how survivors utilize SCPs and the congruency between providers’ and survivors’ perspectives. Feedback from colorectal cancer survivors (in receipt of a personalized/individualized SCP) and oncology providers was obtained via interviews. Survivors noted SCPs benefits of reduced duplicative procedures and cancer worry with the synthesized treatment information. Providers noted billing/reimbursement and time investiture (for form completion) as potential barriers. Further investigation of SCPs is warranted regarding utility prior to widespread adoption in follow-up care.     

The Association between Survivorship Care Plans and Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Confidence with Follow-Up Cancer Care Provided by Primary Care Providers

Survivorship care plans aim to facilitate a smooth transition from tertiary to primary care settings after primary cancer treatment is completed. This study sought to identify the sociodemographic factors associated with receiving a survivorship care plan and examine the relationship between receiving a plan and confidence in follow-up care delivered by primary care providers. A cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer’s Experiences of Cancer Patients in Transition Study was conducted (n = 9970). Separate adjusted multinomial logistic regression models assessed the relationship between survivorship care plans and follow-up care outcomes. Proportion of survivors more likely to receive a survivorship care plan varied by numerous sociodemographic and medical factors, such as cancer type (colorectal and prostate), gender (male), and education (high school or less). In unadjusted and adjusted models, individuals who received a Survivorship Care Plan had significantly higher odds of: having felt their primary care providers were involved; agreeing that their primary care providers understood their needs, knew where to find supports and services, and were able to refer them directly to services; and were confident that their primary care provider could meet their follow-up care needs.     

American Cancer Society Colorectal Cancer Survivorship Care Guidelines

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death in both men and women and second leading cause of cancer death when men and women are combined in the United States (US). Almost two‐thirds of CRC survivors are living 5 years after diagnosis. Considering the recent decline in both incidence and mortality, the prevalence of CRC survivors is likely to increase dramatically over the coming decades with the increase in rates of CRC screening, further advances in early detection and treatment and the aging and growth of the US population. Survivors are at risk for a CRC recurrence, a new primary CRC, other cancers, as well as both short‐term and long‐term adverse effects of the CRC and the modalities used to treat it. CRC survivors may also have psychological, reproductive, genetic, social, and employment concerns after treatment. Communication and coordination of care between the treating oncologist and the primary care clinician is critical to effectively and efficiently manage the long‐term care of CRC survivors. The guidelines in this article are intended to assist primary care clinicians in delivering risk‐based health care for CRC survivors who have completed active therapy. CA Cancer J Clin 2015;65:427–455 . © 2015 American Cancer Society.     

American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The American Cancer Society Head and Neck Cancer Survivorship Care Guideline was developed to assist primary care clinicians and other health practitioners with the care of head and neck cancer survivors, including monitoring for recurrence, screening for second primary cancers, assessment and management of long‐term and late effects, health promotion, and care coordination. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PubMed through April 2015, and a multidisciplinary expert workgroup with expertise in primary care, dentistry, surgical oncology, medical oncology, radiation oncology, clinical psychology, speech‐language pathology, physical medicine and rehabilitation, the patient perspective, and nursing was assembled. While the guideline is based on a systematic review of the current literature, most evidence is not sufficient to warrant a strong recommendation. Therefore, recommendations should be viewed as consensus‐based management strategies for assisting patients with physical and psychosocial effects of head and neck cancer and its treatment. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:203‐239. © 2016 American Cancer Society .     

Development of Phase-Specific Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Plans

IntroductionPhase-specific survivorship care plans (SCPs) have the potential to be powerful tools in providing individualized, comprehensive survivorship care, particularly in terms of care coordination and transition, if used as dynamic documents.Materials and MethodsWe designed an initial follow-up care plan (FCP) to be used at the conclusion of curative therapy, as well as distinct, phase-specific FCPs for periodic use at 5-year and 10-year time points in the survivorship course. These FCPs incorporate the 4 essential components of survivorship care outlined by the Institute of Medicine: prevention, surveillance, intervention for consequences of cancer treatment, and coordination among health care providers.ResultsPhase-specific SCPs were designed by a multidisciplinary team with expertise in breast health, survivorship, and cancer care delivery across diverse practice settings. The FCPs were formulated to align with national guidelines and emergent, peer-reviewed literature, and reflect evolving recommendations regarding the duration of adjuvant hormone therapy. The SCPs were pilot-tested and successfully integrated into the existing work flow of the electronic medical records at each practice site.ConclusionPhase-specific SCPs were developed to incorporate new knowledge about evolving treatment recommendations, screening guidelines, and updated genetic information to encourage timely discussions relevant to the specific stage of survivorship.     

A Qualitative Investigation of Cancer Survivorship Experiences Among Rural Hispanics

Cancer survivorship experiences were explored among Hispanic men and women with cancer and family members of cancer survivors, recruited from two rural Washington communities in the Lower Yakima Valley. Five focus groups were conducted from February 2006 to October 2007 with 31 women and 10 men. Disbelief, fear, sadness, strength, courage, faith, and hope were common reactions to diagnosis. Concerns about family/children, losing medical coupons, and feelings of depression/isolation were identified as challenges faced after diagnosis. Participants identified smoking and environmental exposures as causes of cancer, but many believed operating on tumors caused cancer to spread. Participants used conventional treatments but identified herbal/natural remedies as cures. Most participants reported negative experiences with physicians and believed their community would benefit from language-appropriate information regarding prevention and treatment. The importance of linking survivors through support groups was emphasized and information elicited from sessions has been used to organize survivor support groups in these two communities.     

Breast Cancer Survivorship Care Variations Between Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens

Background

Treatment-related toxicity can vary substantially between chemotherapy regimens. In this study we evaluated the frequency of outpatient office visits among a cohort of early stage breast cancer survivors after completion of 4 different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens to better understand how differences in toxicities between regimens might affect health care use.

Educating Health Care Professionals to Provide Institutional Changes in Cancer Survivorship Care

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2006 report, From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition (In M. Hewitt, S. Greenfield and E. Stovall (Eds.), (pp. 9-186). Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006) identifies the key components of care that contribute to quality of life for the cancer survivor. As cancer survivorship care becomes an important part of quality cancer care oncology professionals need education to prepare themselves to provide this care. Survivorship care requires a varied approach depending on the survivor population, treatment regimens and care settings. The goal of this program was to encourage institutional changes that would integrate survivorship care into participating centers. An NCI-funded educational program: Survivorship Education for Quality Cancer Care provided multidiscipline two-person teams an opportunity to gain this important knowledge using a goal-directed, team approach. Educational programs were funded for yearly courses from 2006 to 2009. Survivorship care curriculum was developed using the Quality of Life Model as the core around the IOM recommendations. Baseline data was collected for all participants. Teams were followed-up at 6, 12 and 18 months postcourse for goal achievement and institutional evaluations. Comparison data from baseline to 18 months provided information on the 204 multidiscipline teams that participated over 4 years. Teams attended including administrators, social workers, nurse practitioners, registered nurses, physicians and others. Participating centers included primarily community cancer centers and academic centers followed by pediatric centers, ambulatory/physician offices and free standing cancer centers. Statistically significant changes at p?=?<0.05 levels were seen by 12 months postcourse related to the effectiveness, receptiveness and comfort of survivorship care in participant settings. Institutional assessments found improvement in seven domains of care that related to institutional change. This course provided education to participants that led to significant changes in survivorship care in their settings.     

Utilization of Internet-Based Survivorship Care Plans by Lung Cancer Survivors

BackgroundPersons living after lung cancer remain an important subset of the cancer survivor population who may be at risk for serious health consequences of lung cancer and its treatments. The Institute of Medicine recommends survivorship care plans for all cancer survivors.Materials and MethodsA program for the creation of survivorship care plans, OncoLife, was made publicly accessible. Users responded to queries regarding demographics, diagnosis, and treatment and received comprehensive, individualized guidelines for future care addressing issues such as late toxicity, second malignancy, fertility, and tumor recurrence. Data were maintained anonymously with approval from the Institutional Review Board.ResultsFrom May 2007 to November 2008, 3343 individuals completed OncoLife surveys. Lung cancer survivors comprised 4% (n = 142), with a median age at diagnosis of 57 years and median current age of 59 years. Lung cancer survivors were 50% male and 83% Caucasian. Chemotherapy was used in the treatment of 78% of patients with lung cancer, radiation was used in 58%, and surgery was used in 38%. Most lung cancer survivors (62%) reported receiving follow-up care from only an oncologist, while 27% reported being monitored by a primary care provider (PCP) and an oncologist, and 6% saw only a PCP. Only 11% reported receiving survivorship information at the conclusion of therapy.ConclusionOncoLife represents the first Web-based program for the creation of survivorship care plans, and lung cancer survivors appear willing to use this type of tool. Most have received multimodality care, placing them at risk for treatment-related late effects. Most survivors do not report receiving routine care from a PCP, so attention to survivor healthcare needs by the oncology community is particularly important.     

Psychosocial and Functional Predictors of Mental Disorder among Prostate Cancer Survivors: Informing Survivorship Care Programs with Evidence-Based Knowledge

Recent research has revealed that prostate cancer (PCa) survivors are facing a silent epidemic of mental disorder. These findings are not surprising when the side effects of highly effective current treatment modalities are considered. Here, we assess the association between urinary function and quality of life indicators to mental disorder among survivors of PCa. This is a cross sectional examination of an analytical sample of 362 men with a history of PCa residing in the Maritimes who took a survey assessing social, physical and health-related quality of life indicators between 2017 and 2021. Mental disorder was assessed using Kessler’s Psychological Distress Scale (K-10). Predictor variables included emotional, functional, social/family and spiritual well-being, measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), and urinary function was measured by International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). Multivariate logistic regression analysis evaluated the contribution of predictors while controlling for age, income, survivorship time (months) since diagnosis, relationship status and treatment modality. Mental disorder was identified among 15.8% of PCa survivors in this sample. High emotional (aOR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69–0.96) and spiritual well-being (aOR = 0.88, 95% CI: 0.81–0.96) were protective factors against mental disorder. Men who screened positive for moderate to severe urinary tract symptoms had three times higher odds (aOR = 3.02, 95% CI: 1.10, 8.32) of screening positive for mental disorder. Men who were on active surveillance or radical prostatectomy with or without added treatment had higher (aOR = 5.87, 95% CI: 1.32–26.13 or aOR = 4.21, 95% CI: 1.07–16.51, respectively) odds of screening positive for mental disorder compared to men who received radiation treatment with or without hormonal therapy for their PCa diagnosis. Unmet emotional and spiritual needs, increased urinary problems and some forms of treatment (e.g., active surveillance or surgery) were associated with mental disorder among PCa survivors. The development of survivorship care programs and support systems that focus on the long-term effects of PCa treatments and the consequences of unmet psychosocial needs of patients during the survivorship journey are critically needed.     

Knowledge About Cancer and Use of Health Care Services Among Hispanic- and Asian-American Older Adults

The study described in this article assessed the perceptions of older members of three ethnic groups (Hispanic, Chinese, and Vietnamese) concerning the accessibility of diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation services, especially in relation to cancer. The specific purposes of the study were to (1) develop a sociocultural instrument for assessing the characteristics of the populations at risk for cancer, patterns of use of health care services, and the degree to which individuals were satisfied with those services, (2) test the validity of the instrument, (3) identify and describe the respondents' perceptions about cancer and their knowledge of the disease, (4) evaluate their current access to diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilitation services, and (5) identify barriers-both actual and perceived-against seeking cancer treatment and rehabilitation. On the basis of their preliminary findings, the authors offer a series of recommendations for removing the barriers to health care revealed by the study.     

Adult Cancer Survivorship: Evolution,Research, and Planning Care

Increases in the number of adult cancer survivors and other issues have forced the oncology community to examine, evaluate, and alter the cancer care paradigm. Pediatric oncologists are grappling with the task of transitioning a growing population of adult survivors of childhood cancer to adult medicine, while oncologists caring for adult cancer survivors are seeking models of follow‐up care that are acceptable to patients and providers. Workforce and access‐to‐care issues suggest that primary care providers will see more cancer survivors in their practices across time, although it is unclear how prepared they are for this task. Translational research is needed to develop evidence‐based clinical care and survivorship care plans. A broad picture of the evolving field of adult cancer survivorship is presented. The recent focus on young adult survivors of childhood cancer, an overview of translational research needed to inform the physical and psychosocial care of cancer survivors, and the roles of primary and specialty care providers managing this population is examined. Finally, an overview of evolving treatment summary and care plan initiatives is presented. CA Cancer J Clin 2009;59:391–410. © 2009 American Cancer Society, Inc.     

Evaluating Survivorship Experiences and Needs Among Rural African American Breast Cancer Survivors

Disparities in cancer survivorship exist among specific populations of breast cancer survivors, specifically rural African American breast cancer survivors (AA-BCS). While effective survivorship interventions are available to address and improve quality of life, interventions must be culturally tailored for relevance to survivors. Here, we report the results of our formative research using focus groups and in-depth interview to better understand unique rural AA-BCS survivorship experiences and needs in the Alabama Black Belt. Surveys were used to gather sociodemographic and cancer treatment data. Fifteen rural AA-BCS shared their experiences and concerns about keeping their cancer a secret, lack of knowledge about survivorship, lingering symptoms, religion and spirituality, cancer surveillance, and general lack of survivorship education and support. Rural AA-BCS were unwilling to share their cancer diagnosis, preferring to keep it a secret to protect family and friends. Quality-of-life issues like lymphedema body image and sexuality were not well understood. They viewed spirituality and religion as essential in coping and accepting cancer. Participants also discussed the importance of and barriers to maintaining health through regular check-ups. They needed social support from family and friends and health care providers. Overall, rural AA-BCS expressed their need for knowledge about survivorship self-management by providing a vivid picture of the realities of cancer survival based on shared concerns for survivorship support and education within the context of culture.