Socioeconomic Trends in Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) Surgery

Objective: We evaluated trends in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the 14‐year period from 1993 to 2006. Materials and Methods: We utilized the Nationwide Inpatient Sample data base from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Results: A total of 34,792 patients underwent DBS surgery from 1993 to 2006. There were 756 DBS cases performed in 1993 compared with 4200 DBS procedures performed in 2006. Significant increases in nationwide DBS volume coincided with regulatory approval for new indications—Parkinson's disease and dystonia, respectively. Cost of DBS surgery increased from $38,840 in 1993 to $69,329 in 2006. The majority of cases were done in metropolitan areas (97%) at large academic centers (91%) at a national bill of $291 MM. Conclusions: Future studies will need to include the socioeconomic impact of the technology on disease status, patient access, and costs as it expands to novel indications.     

Motor Evoked Potentials Improve Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery

ObjectivesOne of the main challenges posed by the surgical deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedure is the successful targeting of the structures of interest and avoidance of side effects, especially in asleep surgery. Here, intraoperative motor evoked potentials (MEPs) might serve as tool to identify the pyramidal tract. We hypothesized that intraoperative MEPs are useful to define the distance to the pyramidal tract and reduce the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects.Materials and MethodsMotor potentials were evoked through both microelectrode and DBS-electrode stimulation during stereotactic DBS surgery on 25 subthalamic nuclei and 3 ventral intermediate thalamic nuclei. Internal capsule proximity was calculated for contacts on microelectrode trajectories, as well as for DBS-electrodes, and correlated with the corresponding MEP thresholds. Moreover, the predictivity of intraoperative MEP thresholds on the probability of postoperative capsular side effects was calculated.ResultsIntraoperative MEPs thresholds correlated significantly with internal capsule proximity, regardless of the stimulation source. Furthermore, MEPs thresholds were highly accurate to exclude the occurrence of postoperative capsular side effects.ConclusionsIntraoperative MEPs provide additional targeting guidance, especially in asleep DBS surgery, where clinical value of microelectrode recordings and test stimulation may be limited. As this technique can exclude future capsular side effects, it can directly be translated into clinical practice.     

Deep Brain Stimulation for Neuropathic Pain

Objectives. To determine whether deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for neuropathic pain of varied etiology. Material and Methods. Thirty‐four patients with intractable neuropathic pain were prospectively studied using visual analog scores, McGill Pain Questionnaire, and Quality of Life Questionnaires (EUROQOL EQ‐5D VAS, and SF‐36 v‐2). Patients had either deep brain stimulation of either the periventricular gray or ventroposterolateral nucleus of the thalamus, or both. Results. Seventy‐six percent of patients underwent permanent implantation. Overall reduction of pain intensity was 54%. The burning component of pain improved by 77%. Health‐related quality of life improved by 38%. Conclusions. Deep brain stimulation is an effective treatment for neuropathic pain. The factors that influence outcome, including etiology and site of stimulation, are discussed.     

Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Isolated Dystonia: Stereotactic Accuracy,Efficacy, and Safety

ObjectivesLead placement for deep brain stimulation (DBS) is routinely performed using neuroimaging or microelectrode recording (MER). Recent studies have demonstrated that DBS under general anesthesia using an imaging-guided target technique (“asleep” DBS) can be performed accurately and effectively with lower surgery complication rates than the MER-guided target method under local anesthesia (“awake” DBS). This suggests that asleep DBS may be a more acceptable method. However, there is limited direct evidence focused on isolated dystonia using this method. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes and targeting accuracy in patients with dystonia who underwent asleep DBS.Materials and MethodsWe examined 56 patients (112 leads) with isolated dystonia who underwent asleep DBS targeting in the globus pallidus internus (GPi) and subthalamic nucleus (STN). The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (BFMDRS) scores were assessed preoperatively and at 12-month follow-up (12 m-FU). The lead accuracy was evaluated by comparing the coordinates of the preoperative plan with those of the final electrode implantation location. Other measures analyzed included stimulation parameters and adverse events (AEs).ResultsFor both GPi and STN cohorts, mean BFMDRS motor scores were significantly lower at 12 m-FU (8.9 ± 10.9 and 4.6 ± 5.7 points) than at baseline (22.6 ± 16.4 and 16.1 ± 14.1 points, p < 0.001). The mean difference between the planned target and the distal contact of the leads was 1.33 ± 0.54 mm for the right brain electrodes and 1.50 ± 0.57 mm for the left, determined by Euclidian distance. No perioperative complications or AEs related to the device were observed during the complete follow-up. However, AEs associated with stimulation occurred in 12 and 6 patients in the GPi and STN groups, respectively.ConclusionsAsleep DBS may be an accurate, effective, and safe method for treating patients with isolated dystonia regardless of the stimulation target.     

Neuromodulation in Dystonia: Current Aspects of Deep Brain Stimulation

Among the surgical treatment options for patients with medically refractory dystonia chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of different targets in the basal ganglia circuitry has become one of the most important tools. The globus pallidus internus nowadays is the target of choice, while there is only limited experience with other targets. At this time, patients with primary (genetic or sporadic) generalized and segmental dystonia, and patients with (complex) cervical dystonia are thought to be the best candidates for pallidal DBS. Advantages of DBS are its reversibility, its adjustability, and the continuous access to modify the target in the basal ganglia. The present review gives an account on the development of surgical neuromodulation therapy for dystonia, surgical approaches, hardware‐related problems, DBS programming and patient management, and clinical outcome. Studies conducted according to the practices of evidence‐based medicine confirm the results of early pilot studies. The wide majority of patients achieve beneficial lasting outcome at a relatively low rate of manageable side‐effects. Along with improvement of the movement disorder, studies report on amelioration of quality‐of‐life surrogates. We also provide an overview on DBS surgery in less common dystonic syndromes, such as craniofacial dystonia, status dystonicus, task‐specific dystonia, paroxysmal dystonia, camptocormia, and secondary dystonias, including choreoathetosis, hemidystonia, tardive dystonia, and pantothenate kinase‐associated neurodegeneration. Furthermore, we discuss the implications of intra‐operative microelectrode recordings and pallidal field potentials for the pathophysiology of dystonia and the particular possible mechanisms of DBS in dystonia. Finally, future perspectives are outlined.     

Deep Brain Stimulation in Movement Disorders: From Experimental Surgery to Evidence‐Based Therapy

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of 3 different targets is the most important therapeutic innovation of the past 30 years for patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease (PD), disabling dystonia, tremors, and refractory Gilles de la Tourette syndrome. When compared with medical treatment alone, controlled studies have shown better motor, nonmotor, and particularly quality‐of‐life outcomes with large effect sizes for advanced complicated PD that cannot be improved with medication, and also for PD patients with only early fluctuations. Class 1 studies have also shown superiority over medical treatment for generalized, segmental, and botulinum‐toxin refractory focal cervical dystonia. Long‐term efficacy is established for all indications with open studies. For tremors, open studies have shown that DBS is remarkably effective on PD and essential tremor, but efficacy on severe essential tremor and cerebellar tremors is limited by a tendency for tolerance/habituation, including concerns about long‐term efficacy. Open studies of disabling Gilles de la Tourette syndrome show an improvement in tics. New developments hold a promise for further improvement. New hardware with directional stimulation and new stimulation paradigms are further areas of research. The targets of DBS are refined with new imaging processing that will help to diversify the surgical targets. New indications are being explored. Closed‐loop DBS using brain or peripheral sensor signals have shown favorable clinical short‐term results. Long‐term data are lacking, and it is hoped that similar approaches for other movement or behavioral disorders may be developed. Exciting new developments carry the hope for a more pathophysiology‐based approach for DBS for various brain circuit disorders. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Surgical and Hardware-Related Adverse Events of Deep Brain Stimulation: A Ten-Year Single-Center Experience

IntroductionAlthough deep brain stimulation (DBS) is effective for treating a number of neurological and psychiatric indications, surgical and hardware-related adverse events (AEs) can occur that affect quality of life. This study aimed to give an overview of the nature and frequency of those AEs in our center and to describe the way they were managed. Furthermore, an attempt was made at identifying possible risk factors for AEs to inform possible future preventive measures.Materials and MethodsPatients undergoing DBS-related procedures between January 2011 and July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed to inventory AEs. The mean follow-up time was 43 ± 31 months. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the predictive value of selected demographic and clinical variables.ResultsFrom January 2011 to July 2020, 508 DBS-related procedures were performed including 201 implantations of brain electrodes in 200 patients and 307 implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacements in 142 patients. Surgical or hardware-related AEs following initial implantation affected 40 of 200 patients (20%) and resolved without permanent sequelae in all instances. The most frequent AEs were surgical site infections (SSIs) (9.95%, 20/201) and wire tethering (2.49%, 5/201), followed by hardware failure (1.99%, 4/201), skin erosion (1.0%, 2/201), pain (0.5%, 1/201), lead migration (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites), and hematoma (0.52%, 2/386 electrode sites). The overall rate of AEs for IPG replacement was 5.6% (17/305). No surgical, ie, staged or nonstaged, electrode fixation, or patient-related risk factors were identified for SSI or wire tethering.ConclusionsMajor AEs including intracranial surgery–related AEs or AEs requiring surgical removal or revision of hardware are rare. In particular, aggressive treatment is required in SSIs involving multiple sites or when Staphylococcus aureus is identified. For future benchmarking, the development of a uniform reporting system for surgical and hardware-related AEs in DBS surgery would be useful.     

Spectral Topography of the Subthalamic Nucleus to Inform Next-Generation Deep Brain Stimulation

Background

The landscape of neurophysiological symptoms and behavioral biomarkers in basal ganglia signals for movement disorders is expanding. The clinical translation of sensing-based deep brain stimulation (DBS) also requires a thorough understanding of the anatomical organization of spectral biomarkers within the subthalamic nucleus (STN).

Objectives

The aims were to systematically investigate the spectral topography, including a wide range of sub-bands in STN local field potentials (LFP) of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and to evaluate its predictive performance for clinical response to DBS.

Methods

STN-LFPs were recorded from 70 PD patients (130 hemispheres) awake and at rest using multicontact DBS electrodes. A comprehensive spatial characterization, including hot spot localization and focality estimation, was performed for multiple sub-bands (delta, theta, alpha, low-beta, high-beta, low-gamma, high-gamma, and fast-gamma (FG) as well as low- and fast high-frequency oscillations [HFO]) and compared to the clinical hot spot for rigidity response to DBS. A spectral biomarker map was established and used to predict the clinical response to DBS.

Results

The STN shows a heterogeneous topographic distribution of different spectral biomarkers, with the strongest segregation in the inferior-superior axis. Relative to the superiorly localized beta hot spot, HFOs (FG, slow HFO) were localized up to 2 mm more inferiorly. Beta oscillations are spatially more spread compared to other sub-bands. Both the spatial proximity of contacts to the beta hot spot and the distance to higher-frequency hot spots were predictive for the best rigidity response to DBS.

Conclusions

The spatial segregation and properties of spectral biomarkers within the DBS target structure can additionally be informative for the implementation of next-generation sensing-based DBS. © 2023 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.     

Chasing Tics in the Human Brain: Development of Open,Scheduled and Closed Loop Responsive Approaches to Deep Brain Stimulation for Tourette Syndrome

Tourette syndrome is a childhood-onset disorder characterized by a combination of motor and vocal tics, often associated with psychiatric comorbidities including attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder and obsessive-compulsive disorder. Despite an onset early in life, half of patients may present symptoms in adulthood, with variable degrees of severity. In select cases, the syndrome may lead to significant physical and social impairment, and a worrisome risk for self injury. Evolving research has provided evidence supporting the idea that the pathophysiology of Tourette syndrome is directly related to a disrupted circuit involving the cortex and subcortical structures, including the basal ganglia, nucleus accumbens, and the amygdala. There has also been a notion that a dysfunctional group of neurons in the putamen contributes to an abnormal facilitation of competing motor responses in basal ganglia structures ultimately underpinning the generation of tics. Surgical therapies for Tourette syndrome have been reserved for a small group of patients not responding to behavioral and pharmacological therapies, and these therapies have been directed at modulating the underlying pathophysiology. Lesion therapy as well as deep brain stimulation has been observed to suppress tics in at least some of these cases. In this article, we will review the clinical aspects of Tourette syndrome, as well as the evolution of surgical approaches and we will discuss the evidence and clinical responses to deep brain stimulation in various brain targets. We will also discuss ongoing research and future directions as well as approaches for open, scheduled and closed loop feedback-driven electrical stimulation for the treatment of Tourette syndrome.     

Deep Brain Stimulation Compared With Contingency Management for the Treatment of Cocaine Use Disorders: A Threshold and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

ObjectivesCocaine is the second most frequently used illicit drug worldwide (after cannabis), and cocaine use disorder (CUD)-related deaths increased globally by 80% from 1990 to 2013. There is yet to be a regulatory-approved treatment. Emerging preclinical evidence indicates that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus accumbens may be a therapeutic option. Prior to expanding the costly investigation of DBS for treatment of CUD, it is important to ensure societal cost-effectiveness.AimsWe conducted a threshold and cost-effectiveness analysis to determine the success rate at which DBS would be equivalent to contingency management (CM), recently identified as the most efficacious therapy for treatments of CUDs.Materials and MethodsQuality of life, efficacy, and safety parameters for CM were obtained from previous literature. Costs were calculated from a societal perspective. Our model predicted the utility benefit based on quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental-cost-effectiveness ratio resulting from two treatments on a one-, two-, and five-year timeline.ResultsOn a one-year timeline, DBS would need to impart a success rate (ie, cocaine free) of 70% for it to yield the same utility benefit (0.492 QALYs per year) as CM. At no success rate would DBS be more cost-effective (incremental-cost-effectiveness ratio <$50,000) than CM during the first year. Nevertheless, as DBS costs are front loaded, DBS would need to achieve success rates of 74% and 51% for its cost-effectiveness to exceed that of CM over a two- and five-year period, respectively.ConclusionsWe find DBS would not be cost-effective in the short term (one year) but may be cost-effective in longer timelines. Since DBS holds promise to potentially be a cost-effective treatment for CUDs, future randomized controlled trials should be performed to assess its efficacy.