The management of the infected aortic prosthesis: A current decade of experience

Purpose: Newer approaches to the patient with an infected aortic graft are available. We reviewed a recent 10-year experience with a more traditional approach to evaluate its outcome in the 1990s.Methods: From January 1983 to January 1993, 27 patients with an aortic graft infection were treated at our institution. There were 18 paraprosthetic infections, eight graft enteric erosions, and one aortoduodenal fistula. The involved bypasses included 20 aortofemoral (74%), five aortoiliac (18%), and two aortic tube grafts (8%). Nineteen aortic replacements were done originally for aneurysmal disease (70%). We reviewed the outcome of each patient treated as it related to the method of management. The therapy for graft infection consisted of aortic graft removal and axillofemoral bypass in 20 patients (74%), treatment by an in situ method in four patients (15%), excision of an aortofemoral limb and extraanatomic bypass in two patients (7%), and extraanatomic bypass alone in one patient (4%). In the group treated by graft removal and extraanatomic bypass, four patients (20%) had staged operations (extraanatomic bypass followed by interval aortic graft removal), nine (45%) had single operations with extraanatomic bypass preceding graft removal, and seven (35%) had single operations with graft removal preceding extraanatomic bypass.Results: The 30-day operative mortality rate was 3.7%. There were no instances of aortic stump blowout. The 3-year primary patency rate for axillofemoral bypass limbs was 80.2%, and the secondary patency rate was 87.4%. No limbs were lost as a result of ischemic complications. There was one late amputation for an unrelated problem.Conclusions: The results of alternate approaches to the management of patients with infected aortic grafts were equivalent both in terms of perioperative mortality and morbidity rates in this group of patients. Complete excision of the aortic graft with axillofemoral bypass provided a satisfactory long-term outcome and remains the standard with which other approaches must be compared. (J VASC SURG 1994;19:844-50.)     

Delayed aortic prosthetic reconstruction after removal of an infected graft

The amputation morbidity associated with the treatment of vascular graft infection continues to be a major clinical problem. Late amputation associated with failure of extraanatomic bypass initially required to avoid infected tissue beds might be reduced if delayed anatomic aortic prosthetic reconstruction could be safely employed. Two major concerns about this treatment option are the safety of the redo aortic reconstruction and the risk of recurrent infection in the reimplanted graft. Seven patients in whom recurrent limb ischemia or extraanatomic bypass infection developed underwent delayed aortic reconstruction using either an in-line aortic graft or supraceliac aortofemoral bypass at a mean interval of 14.5 months after removal of the infected graft. There were no perioperative deaths, and six of seven patients were well at a mean follow-up of 57 months postoperatively. All grafts remained patent throughout the follow-up period and no further amputations were required. No reimplanted graft became infected, which suggests that a reimplantation interval of 6 to 12 months may be safe. These data indicate that delayed aortic prosthetic reconstruction may be considered a safe and effective treatment option for those patients in whom limb-threatening recurrent ischemia or recurrent extraanatomic graft infection develops after treatment of aortic vascular graft infection.     

Long-term outcome after treatment of aortic graft infection with staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine long-term outcome in patients with infected prosthetic aortic grafts who were treated with extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. METHODS: Between January 1989 and July 1999, 36 patients were treated for aortic graft infection with extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal. Extra-anatomic bypass graft types were axillofemoral femoral (5), axillofemoral (26; bilateral in 20), axillopopliteal (3; bilateral in 1) and axillofemoral/axillopopliteal (2). The mean follow-up was 32.3 +/- 4. 8 months. RESULTS: Four patients (11%) died in the postoperative period, and two patients died during follow-up as a direct consequence of extra-anatomic bypass grafting and aortic graft removal (one died 7 months after extra-anatomic bypass graft failure, one died 36 months after aortic stump disruption). One additional patient died 72 months after failure of a subsequent aortic reconstruction, so that the overall treatment-related mortality was 19%, whereas overall survival by means of life table analysis was 56% at 5 years. No amputations were required in the postoperative period, but four patients (11%) required amputation during follow-up. Twelve patients (35%) had extra-anatomic bypass graft failure during follow-up, and six patients underwent secondary aortic reconstruction (thoracobifemoral [2], iliofemoral [2], femorofemoral [2]). However, with the exclusion of patients undergoing axillopopliteal grafts (primary patency 0% at 7 months), only seven patients (25%) had extra-anatomic bypass graft failure, and only two patients required amputation (one after extra-anatomic bypass graft removal for infection, one after failure of a secondary aortic reconstruction). Furthermore, primary and secondary patency rates by means of life table analysis were 75% and 100% at 41 months for axillofemoral femoral grafts and 64% and 100% at 60 months for axillofemoral grafts. Only one patient required extra-anatomic bypass graft removal for recurrent infection, and only one late aortic stump disruption occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Staged extra-anatomic bypass grafting (with axillofemoral bypass graft) and aortic graft removal for treatment of aortic graft infection are associated with acceptable early and long-term outcomes and should remain a primary approach in selected patients with this grave problem.     

Surgical Thrombectomy and Transluminal Balloon Angioplasty for Failed Above-knee Femoropopliteal Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass Grafts

Endovascular therapy offers an alternative to redo bypass or surgical graft revision for failed above-knee femoropopliteal PTFE bypass grafts. We evaluated the outcome of surgical thrombectomy and balloon angioplasty for the treatment of thrombosed bypass grafts. Thirty selected patients with thrombosed above-knee femoropopliteal PTFE bypass grafts were treated. Under local anesthesia, a surgical thrombectomy followed by bypass graft angiography and balloon angioplasty of perianastomotic stenoses was performed. Stents were used selectively for suboptimal angioplasty results. Patients underwent duplex scanning of the bypass graft postoperatively and at 6-month intervals. Life-table analysis and log-rank (Mantel-Cox) comparisons were performed. Patients were categorized into two groups on the basis of time elapsed from initial bypass graft construction to graft failure. Group 1 included 21 patients with a mean time to graft failure of 10 months (range, 0-20). Surgical thrombectomy was successful in 20 grafts (95%) and 17 patients had a stent placed after angioplasty. Rethrombosis occurred within 30 days in seven grafts (33%) in group 1 and major amputations were performed in six patients (28%). Group 2 included nine patients with a mean time to initial bypass graft failure of 48 months (range, 29-96). All patients in group 2 had a successful surgical thrombectomy and all received a stent. None of the grafts treated in group 2 reoccluded within 30 days of intervention and one patient (11%) went on to require a major amputation. By life-table analysis, the 6- and 12-month patency for group 1 was 15.3% and 5.1%, compared to 58.3% and 38.9% for group 2 (p = 0.027). Surgical thrombectomy along with balloon angioplasty has an unacceptably high rate of failure and limb loss in patients treated for early (<2 years) femoropopliteal PTFE bypass graft thrombosis. Surgical graft revision or redo bypass is recommended to achieve successful revascularization in these patients. Treatment with surgical thrombectomy and balloon angioplasty achieves significantly greater short-term patency results in patients with late (>2 years) bypass graft failure and may be a reasonable alternative for patients who cannot tolerate reoperation or lack autogenous conduit.Presented at the Twenty-eighth Annual Meeting of the Peripheral Vascular Surgery Society, Chicago, IL, June 7, 2003.     

Influence of Patient Characteristics and Treatment Options on Outcome of Patients with Prosthetic Aortic Graft Infection

This study was undertaken to determine the influence of patient characteristics and treatment options on survival and limb loss after treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infection. Fifty-three patients treated for prosthetic aortic graft infection were reviewed. Twenty-three presented with groin infection, 12 with sepsis, 10 with aortoenteric fistula, 4 with limb ischemia, and 4 with pseudoaneurysm. Treatment included staged extraanatomic bypass (EAB) plus graft excision in 23 patients, simultaneous EAB and graft excision in 18, in situ graft replacement in 5, and local therapy only in 7. Axillofemoral bypass was done for revascularization in 53 limbs and axillopopliteal bypass in 16 limbs. The results of this study showed that morbidity and mortality of prosthetic aortic graft infection is influenced by the presentation and type of treatment of the infected graft. Staged axillofemoral bypass (when possible) plus graft excision appears to be associated with acceptable outcome (survival with limb salvage in 74%).     

Surgical treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection following infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.

A 64-year-old man was referred to our hospital with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection following infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. As repeated MRSA sepsis occurred, we decided to remove the infected graft with distal revascularization via circuitous graft tunneling to avoid serious infections and allow limb salvage. An iliofemoro bypass was performed via an extra-anatomical bypass, from just below the iliac crest into the musculus quadriceps femoris using an 8 mm-ringed polyester gelatin polypropylene tube graft, with complete debridement of a groin infection. Postoperative 3-dimentional CT angiography revealed that the prostheses was patent and the patient had an uneventful postoperative course. We concluded that this extra-anatomical bypass was a safe procedure and an excellent option for patients with an infected vascular prosthetic graft in the groin after previous revascularization, like in our case with no available autogeneous vein grafts.     

Experience with cryopreserved arterial allografts in the treatment of prosthetic graft infections

The authors present a retrospective study on 30 patients with prosthetic graft infection. Included are 25 patients with aortic graft infection, three with infection of a femorodistal bypass and two with infected axillofemoral grafts. There were 23 isolated primary prosthetic graft infections and seven aorto-enteric fistulas. Treatment consisted of graft excision and replacement with cryopreserved arterial homografts, harvested from brain-death multi-organ donors. The in situ technique was used in 27 cases. Eight patients died postoperatively and two deaths were from allograft related complications. The operative mortality rate was 11% for isolated aortic graft sepsis and the early limb salvage rate was 100%. Persistent or recurrent infection was noted in two cases. The mean follow-up of the series was 24.5 months and occlusive complications occurred in five patients (23%), which resulted in two major amputations. Serial CT scans showed abnormalities in six of the 22 survivors, all of them related to the aortic segment of the allograft. It is concluded that in situ reconstruction with cryopreserved arterial allografts represents an acceptable alternative, especially in the treatment of isolated aortic graft sepsis. Continued follow-up towards late deterioration and/or occlusive complications remains mandatory.     

Treatment of late occlusions and stenoses after an aortofemoral bypass operation

Thirty-three patients with one or several late occlusions in 43 limbs of aortofemoral dacron grafts underwent 56 reconstructions because of impending limb loss. Thrombectomy alone with patch closure was less successful. Excision of the femoral anastomosis, resection of the distal part of the occluded prosthetic limb and replacement by a new velours graft tube together with profundaplasty and further downstream reconstruction revealed the best results. The early reocclusion rate was 10%, the late reocclusion rate was 10%. There was no operative mortality and no amputation. Two late deaths occurred, in one case due to grade III infection with sepsis. Another late graft infection was successfully managed by an extraanatomic bypass and excision of the infected limb. The reasons for late occlusions of aortofemoral grafts were found to be incomplete reconstruction of the outflow tract, technical failure at the time of primary reconstruction and progressive atherosclerosis. Hypertonus was common in all cases with progression of the disease. Technical details of the operative management for late occlusion are presented.     

In situ repair of mycotic abdominal aortic aneurysms with rifampin-bonded gelatin-impregnated Dacron grafts: A preliminary case report

Treatment of mycotic aortic aneurysm by excision and extraanatomic bypass is difficult to apply when the infectious process involves the visceral arteries. On the basis of experimental studies in our laboratory that demonstrated prolonged antistaphylococcal activity of rifampin-bonded, gelatin-impregnated Dacron grafts after implantation in the arterial circulation, this conduit was successfully used for in situ replacement of a native aortic infection in two patients. Both patients had fever, leukocytosis, abdominal or back pain, and a computed tomographic scan that demonstrated contained rupture of a mycotic aneurysm. Preoperative computed tomography guided aspiration and culture of periaortic fluid from one patient grew Staphylococcus aureus. Treatment consisted of prolonged (6 weeks) culture-specific parenteral antibiotic therapy, excision of involved aorta, oxychlorosene irrigation of the aortic bed, and restoration of aortic continuity by in situ prosthetic replacement. A preliminary right axillobifemoral bypass was performed in the patient who had an infection involving the suprarenal and infrarenal aorta. In both patients intraoperative culture of aorta wall recovered S. aureus. Patients were discharged at 20 and 21 days. Clinical follow-up and computed tomographic imaging of the replacement graft beyond 10 months after surgery demonstrated no signs of residual aortic infection. In the absence of gross pus and frank sepsis, the use of an antibiotic-bonded prosthetic graft with antistaphylococcal activity should be considered in patients who have arterial infections caused by S. aureus when excision and ex situ bypass are not feasible. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:472-6.)     

Conservative management of a methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA)-infected aortobifemoral graft: Report of a case

A 63-year-old man was referred to our department for treatment of intermittent claudication in the right lower limb. The preoperative angiogram showed severe stenosis extending from the terminal aorta to the bilateral common femoral arteries, with occlusion of the right superficial femoral artery and the left popliteal artery. He underwent aortobifemoral bypass with thromboendarterectomy of the left common femoral artery, and right graft-popliteal artery bypass. The patient had an uneventful postoperative course; however, 14 days after the operation, a pulsatile mass suddenly appeared in the left groin. Emergency surgery revealed disruption of the left distal anastomosis of the aortobifemoral bypass and therefore, revision, in the form of graft-profunda femoris artery interposition with graft-superficial femoral artery bypass, was performed. Microscopic examination showed colonies of bacteria in the host artery adventitia adjacent to the anastomosis. Culture of the discharge from the right groin operative scar revealed methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The discharge resolved following the intravenous administration of vancomycin and the local application of vancomycin ointment. There were no operative complications other than the MRSA infection, and the patient was discharged 20 days after revision surgery. In the 14 months since the revision, all grafts have remained patent and there have been no further symptoms of graft infection.     

The results of in situ prosthetic replacement for infected aortic grafts.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of aortic graft infection with graft excision and axillofemoral bypass may carry an increased risk of limb loss, aortic stump blowout, and pelvic ischemia. A review of patients with aortic graft infection treated with in situ prosthetic graft replacement was undertaken to determine if mortality, limb loss, and reinfection rates were improved with this technique. METHODS: The clinical data of 25 patients, 19 males and 6 females, with a mean age of 68 years (range 35 to 83), with aortic graft infection, treated between January 1, 1989, and December 31, 1998, by in situ prosthetic graft replacement were reviewed. Follow-up was complete in the 23 surviving patients and averaged 36 months (range 4 to 103). RESULTS: Twenty aortofemoral, 3 aortoiliac, and 2 straight aortic graft infections were treated with excision and in situ replacement with standard polyester grafts in 16 patients (64%), or with rifampin-soaked collagen or gelatin-impregnated polyester grafts in 9 patients (36%). Fifteen patients (60%) had aortic graft enteric fistulas, 8 patients (32%) had abscesses or draining sinuses, and 2 patients (8%) had bacterial biofilm infections. Thirty-day mortality was 8% (2 of 25). There were no early graft occlusions or amputations. There was one late graft occlusion. There were no late amputations. The reinfection rate was 22% (5 grafts). All reinfections occurred in patients operated upon for occlusive disease. Only one reinfection occurred in the rifampin-soaked graft group (11% versus 29%, P = NS). Reinfection tended to be lower in patients with aortoenteric fistulas and without abscess. Autogenous tissue coverage provided statistically significant protection against reinfection. There were no late deaths related to in situ graft infection. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with in situ graft replacement had an 8% mortality and 100% limb salvage rate. Reinfection rates were similar to those of extra-anatomic bypass, but a trend of lower reinfection rates with rifampin-impregnated grafts was apparent. Patients with aortoenteric fistula and without abscess appear to be well treated by the technique of in situ prosthetic grafting and autogenous tissue coverage.     

Redo aortic grafting after treatment of aortic graft infection

Purpose: This study was performed to determine the indications, operative strategy, and hemodynamic benefit of redo aortic grafting procedures after earlier excision of an infected aortic graft.Methods: Among 164 patients treated for aortic graft infection, 15 later underwent redo aortic grafting procedures an average of 18 months (range, 1 to 59 months) after removal of an infected aortic graft. Redo grafting procedures were performed for leg ischemia (n = 11) or infection (proven, n = 3; suspected, n = 1). The new aortic graft originated either from the distal thoracic aorta (n = 5) or from the juxtarenal aortic stump (n = 10). Follow-up averaged 56 months (range, 7 to 110 months).Results: All patients survived the redo grafting procedure. In the eleven patients who had ischemic symptoms, redo grafting procedures uniformly resulted in symptomatic improvement with an increase in ankle-brachial indexes (0.78 ± 0.34 vs 0.50 ± 0.29; p = 0.02). A graft limb occlusion developed in two of these patients (3 and 6 months), but no limbs were amputated. In the four patients who had proven or suspected extraanatomic bypass graft infection, there was one graft limb occlusion (29 months) and one amputation (17 months). Overall, recurrent graft infection occurred in three of 15 patients and may be more frequent in patients who have a proven extraanatomic bypass graft infection (2 of 3 vs 1 of 12; p = 0.08). Infection accounted for two of the three graft limb occlusions and two of the three late deaths. Recurrent infection was not associated with early (<1 year) regrafting procedures, and culture results did not correlate with the microbiologic features of the primary infection.Conclusions: Redo aortic grafting procedures can be performed safely and at relatively early intervals (6 to 12 months) after removal of the infected aortic graft. The procedure reliably relieves ischemic symptoms of the hemodynamically inadequate extraanatomic bypass graft. Reinfection remains a risk after redo aortic grafting procedures, particularly when treating established extraanatomic bypass graft infection. (J Vasc Surg 1996;24:328-37.)     

Extraanatomic aortic bypass for repair of aortic arch coarctation via sternotomy: midterm clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results

BACKGROUND: We analyzed our 22 years of experience with extraanatomic bypass grafting for repair of aortic arch coarctation in adults. Results from early and midterm follow-up with clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance angiography are reported. METHODS: Between November 1979 and December 2001, 18 consecutive patients aged 18 to 61 years (mean, 31.8 +/- 13.3 years) underwent extraanatomic bypass grafting to repair coarctation of the aortic arch. Six patients (33.3%) had recoarctation after previous repair through a left thoracotomy, and 3 (16.7%) had associated cardiac diseases. The operative technique used in all patients was ascending aorta-to-descending thoracic aorta bypass with a polyethylene terephthalate fiber (Dacron) graft through a median sternotomy and posterior pericardial approach. RESULTS: Follow-up was completed in all patients, with a mean duration of 5.6 +/- 5.7 years (range, 12 months to 22 years). The follow-up interval exceeded 10 years in 5 patients. No neurologic complications, early or late mortality, late reoperations, or graft complications occurred. Six patients (33.3%) had mild hypertension. All patients were asymptomatic with patent Dacron grafts confirmed by echocardiography. Magnetic resonance angiography, performed in 15 (83.3%) patients, revealed that the Dacron grafts were still patent at a mean interval of 4.0 +/- 6.2 years (range, 5 days to 22 years) after repair. CONCLUSIONS: Extraanatomic ascending aorta-to-descending thoracic aorta bypass grafting for repair of aortic arch coarctation in adults is safe, with low morbidity and no mortality. The favorable midterm results indicate this technique is a safe and less invasive means of repairing aortic arch coarctation or recoarctation in adults.     

DEVELOPMENT OF A STAPHYLOCOCCUS EPIDERMIDIS VASCULAR GRAFT INFECTION MODEL IN SHEEP

Staphylococcus epidermidis is an increasingly recognized causative organism of vascular graft infections. To increase our understanding of this problem we have tried to establish Staph. epidermidis vascular graft infection in sheep by direct inoculation. A 2 cm long, 5 mm diameter polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) or a gelatin sealed Dacron vascular graft was inserted into the left carotid artery, At the completion of the operation 1 mL of normal saline containing either 10⁴, 10⁶, or 10⁸ colony forming units (cfu) of a slime producing Staph. epidermidis was inoculated directly onto the graft. After 3 weeks the grafts were harvested in a sterile fashion. Swabs were taken of the perigraft tissues and the external and internal aspects of the grafts; a 3–5 mm segment of the graft was incubated in broth medium and a second segment was ground for 5 min and then incubated in broth medium. Note was made of the presence of abscess formation, anastomotic failure or thrombosis. Thirteen sheep received a PTFE graft and 14 received a gelatin sealed Dacron graft. Three sheep died immediately postoperatively. The rate of infection was 40% at 10⁴. 67% at 10⁶ and 80% at 10⁸ cfu Staph. epidermidis. In only four cases were all five cultures positive. In nine cases two or less cultures were positive, the majority of these being the broth cultures. Nine other organisms were isolated from nine mixed infections. Nine out of 13 PTFE and seven out of 11 Dacron grafts were infected. The rate of graft infection grew with increasing concentration of inoculum. Retrieval of bacteria was greatest when the graft was cultured directly, especially with physical disruption. Infection with additional organisms was common. There was no difference in the infection rate between gelatin sealed Dacron and PTFE.     

A Simple Technique to Prevent Graft Kinking During Tunneling of a Reversed Vein Femoropopliteal Bypass Graft

Kinking of reversed vein grafts is a recognized cause of early graft failure following femoropopliteal bypass. The commonly employed technique of marking one side of the vein prior to tunneling does not prevent graft twisting and kinking with absolute certainty, as proven by postoperative sonographic evidence. The authors herein describe a technique of tunneling the graft while distended, which resulted in no occurrence of either graft kinking or twisting based on ultrasound examinations of 44 reversed vein grafts over the past 3 years.     

Patency of superficial femoral vein employed as a crossover femoral artery bypass conduit

This study assesses the patency of superficial femoral vein used as a crossover femoral artery bypass conduit in patients presenting either with localized groin sepsis, generalized sepsis or in patients with occluded or heavily diseased superficial femoral artery outflow. Twenty patients were followed prospectively with femoral crossover grafts constructed of superficial femoral vein. Twelve patients presented with sepsis and 8 with chronic ischemia from iliac artery occlusion and severely diseased superficial femoral artery outflow. Graft patency was assessed with regular duplex ultrasound examination. There was one perioperative death. Six patients died during the follow-up period. Mean follow-up time was 24.3 months. No graft occluded or required revision. There was no limb loss, graft infection, or graft hemorrhage. Superficial femoral vein offers an effective femoral crossover bypass graft in patients with either localized/generalized sepsis or disadvantaged outflow tracts.     

Cardiopulmonary bypass established via a sutured vascular graft in the presence of extraanatomic bypass

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) was established via a sutured collagen sealed knitted Dacron graft in two patients who had undergone extraanatomic bypasses for lower limb ischemia, whose ascending aorta was not suitable for cannulation. One patient, with a history of femorofemoral bypass, underwent surgery for a ruptured aortic arch aneurysm (AAA) and the other patient, with a history of axillobifemoral bypass for chronic dissection involving the aortic arch and descending aorta, had unstable angina and underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. This technique of perfusion was found to be safe and effective for patients with an impaired ascending aorta who have undergone an extraanatomic bypass for the lower limb.     

Descending thoracic aorta-to-iliofemoral artery bypass as an alternative to aortoiliac reconstruction.

During the last 3 decades subcutaneous extraanatomic bypass, despite its limited durability, has been the favored alternative to infrarenal aortofemoral bypass. Meanwhile, the descending thoracic aorta has been scarcely used as an inflow source for aortoiliac reconstruction. Over the past 8 years we performed 16 bypasses from the descending thoracic aorta to the iliofemoral vessels for occlusive disease. Our experience combined with that found in the English-language literature totaled 141 patients. In 79 patients (56%) the indication for surgery was failure or infection of an abdominal aortofemoral graft. Previous abdominal operations, sepsis, radiation therapy, the presence of abdominal stomas, or an unsuitable infrarenal aorta were the indications in the remaining cases. The combined operative mortality rate was 6.4%. The life-table primary graft patency was 98% at 1 year, 88% at 2 years, and 70.4% at 5 years. Bypass from the descending thoracic aorta to the iliofemoral artery uses an inflow source superior to other extraanatomic reconstructions, does not require aortic cross-clamping, avoids the abdominal cavity, and places the graft remote to the skin and intestine. The operative mortality and patency rates compare favorably to those of other extraanatomic or remedial aortic reconstructions. Descending thoracic aorta to iliofemoral artery bypass is a superb alternative to abdominal aortofemoral bypass, carries a low mortality rate, has an excellent short-term patency, and features unique characteristics for long-term durability.     

Aortic and peripheral prosthetic graft infection: differential management and causes of mortality

This report of 25 patients with prosthetic graft infection has compared the diagnosis, management, and outcome in 14 patients with infected aortic grafts with 11 patients with infected peripheral grafts (two axillofemorofemoral, five femorofemoral, five femoropopliteal, and one femoral interposition). Peripheral graft infection had a significantly shorter interval to diagnosis compared with aortic graft infection. Total graft removal combined with either autogenous revascularization or extraanatomic bypass using prosthetic graft was performed in all 14 patients with infected aortic grafts. Management of peripheral graft infection consisted of total graft removal in eight patients (four with autogenous revascularization and two with amputation) and partial graft removal in three patients (two with amputation). Mortality and amputation rates for infected aortic grafts were 43 percent and 25 percent, respectively compared with 36 percent and 27 percent for infected peripheral grafts. Recommendations for management of the infected aortic prosthetic graft include total graft removal, but methods and timing of revascularization are dependent on the specific features of the individual case. However, preferred management for the infected peripheral prosthetic graft includes total graft removal and, if indicated, revascularization using autogenous tissue.     

Infected arterial grafts: clinical manifestations and surgical management

The clinical manifestations and results of management in twenty-five patients treated for infected vascular grafts are reviewed. The overall incidence of infection in this series of prosthetic grafts is 1.4%. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the single most common infecting organism and multiple organisms were found in nine patients. Therapy was divided into three methods of management: local therapy alone resulted in a mortality of 45% and an amputation rate of 36.3%; partial graft excision resulted in a mortality of 20% and an amputation rate of 60%; total graft excision resulted in a mortality of 22% and an amputation rate of 22% as well. All amputations were above-knee amputations and the most common cause of death was continuing sepsis. The overall mortality of 32% and a loss of limb rate of 44% are testimony to the serious nature of this problem.