Anterior vs. Posterior Mediastinal Routes in Colon Interposition after Esophagectomy

Background/Aims: Colon interposition is the most commonly used method of esophageal reconstruction when the stomach cannot be used; however, this method may cause surgical complications such as anastomotic leakage and sepsis due to colon necrosis. Therefore, many surgeons use a retrosternal or subcutaneous route because it is easier to manage the subcutaneous drainage when anastomotic leakage occurs. However, some researchers have reported that the posterior mediastinal route provides better long-term functional outcomes after surgery than the anterior mediastinal route. Thus, in this study, we compared these reconstruction routes used for colon interposition, with or without the supercharge technique, in patients with a history of distal gastrectomy, who have undergone colon interposition after esophagectomy. Methodology: We retrospectively studied 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with colon interposition. These patients were divided into 2 groups based on the reconstruction route: the anterior mediastinal or subcutaneous route (A group), or the posterior mediastinal route (R group). Results: Anastomotic leakages were observed in 4 patients (26.7%) in the A group and in 1 patient (6.7%) in the R group. Conclusions: Ischemia is not always the result of arterial failure, but may also originate from venous blood flow impairment due to injury or distortion of veins.     

Perioperative outcomes of esophagectomy preceded by the laparoscopic transhiatal approach for esophageal cancer

This study was designed to determine the efficacy of esophagectomy preceded by the laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTHA) with regard to the perioperative outcomes of esophageal cancer. The esophageal hiatus was opened by hand‐assisted laparoscopic surgery, and carbon dioxide was introduced into the mediastinum. Dissection of the distal esophagus was performed up to the level of the tracheal bifurcation. En bloc dissection of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes was performed using LTHA. Next, cervical lymphadenectomy, reconstruction via a retrosternal route with a gastric tube and anastomosis from a cervical approach were performed. Finally, a small thoracotomy (around 10 cm in size) was made to extract the thoracic esophagus and allow upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy to be performed. The treatment outcomes of 27 esophageal cancer patients who underwent LTHA‐preceding esophagectomy were compared with those of 33 patients who underwent the transthoracic approach preceding esophagectomy without LTHA (thoracotomy; around 20 cm in size). The intrathoracic operative time and operative bleeding were significantly decreased by LTHA. The total operative time did not differ between the two groups, suggesting that the abdominal procedure was longer in the LTHA group. The number of resected lymph nodes did not differ between the two groups. Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 18.5% of patients treated with LTHA and 30.3% of those treated without it. The increase in the number of peripheral white blood cells and the duration of thoracic drainage were significantly decreased by this method. Our surgical procedure provides a good surgical view of the posterior mediastinum, markedly shortens the intrathoracic operative time, and decreases the operative bleeding without increasing major postoperative complications.     

Esophageal cancer after distal gastrectomy

The effect of gastrectomy on the subsequent development of esophageal cancer was investigated. Duodenogastroesophageal reflux is thought to be common in patients after distal gastrectomy, but whether this contributes to the development of esophageal cancer in such patients is controversial. We retrospectively evaluated 153 patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer between January 2002 and July 2005. They were divided into two groups, according to whether or not they had previously undergone a gastrectomy: group 1, comprising 14 patients who had undergone gastrectomy and group 2, comprising 139 patients who had not. Clinical profiles of the patients were obtained from the medical records and the whole resected esophagus was histopathologically examined. The interval between gastrectomy and esophagectomy in group 1 was significantly shorter in the patients who had undergone gastrectomy for gastric cancer (10.5 +/- 4.2 years) than in those who had undergone gastrectomy for a peptic ulcer (28.9 +/- 3.0 years). The interval was also somehow shorter in the patients for whom anastomosis had been performed by Billroth I (21.3 +/- 5.6 years) compared with Billroth II (29.7 +/- 3.2 years), although the difference did not reach its statistical significance (P = 0.11). Moreover, the proportion of lower third tumors in patients after gastrectomy was significantly higher compared with that of the patients with intact stomach. These findings suggest that a history of gastrectomy is associated with more lower-third squamous cell esophageal carcinoma.     

Combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomsis

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 112 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma and gastro-esophageal anastomosis in right thoracic cavity from October 2011 to June 2013. First, the gastric tube was created with the aid of linear stapling device by removing the stomach and dissecting lymph nodes under laparoscopy and making a 3-4 cm incision through the subxiphoid area in the upper abdomen. Second, the thoracic esophagus and lymph nodes were dissected during thoracoscopic procedure. Gastric tube was inserted into the chest cavity and placed in the posterior mediastinum. The thoracic gastro-esophageal anastomosis was stapled with a circular stapler. Combined laparoscopic-thoracoscopic esophagectomy and intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis is technically feasible and safe, with minimized trauma, less operative blood loss and quick recovery.KEYWORDS : Laparoscopic, thoracoscopic, esophagectomy, esophagogastric anastomosis, esophageal carcinoma     

Laparoscopic transhiatal approach for resection of an adenocarcinoma in long-segment Barrett's esophagus

Barrett's esophagus(BE) is a precursor of esophageal adenocarcinoma and is associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, which is often preceded by a hiatal hernia. We describe a case of esophageal adenocarcinoma arising in long-segment BE(LSBE) associated with a hiatal hernia that was successfully treated with a laparoscopic transhiatal approach(LTHA) without thoracotomy. The patient was a 42-year-old male who had previously undergone laryngectomy and tracheal separation to avoid repeated aspiration pneumonitis. An ulcerative lesion was found in a hiatal hernia by endoscopy and superficial esophageal cancer was also detected in the lower thoracic esophagus. The histopathological diagnosis of biopsy samples from both lesions was adenocarcinoma. There were difficulties with the thoracic approach because the patient had severe kyphosis and muscular contractures from cerebral palsy. Therefore, we performed subtotal esophagectomy by LTHA without thoracotomy. Using hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the esophageal hiatus was divided and carbon dioxide was introduced into the mediastinum. A hernial sac was identified on the cranial side of the right crus of the diaphragm and carefully separated from the surrounding tissues. Abruption of the thoracic esophagus was performed up to the level of thearch of the azygos vein via LTHA. A cervical incision was made in the left side of the permanent tracheal stoma, the cervical esophagus was divided, and gastric tube reconstruction was performed via a posterior mediastinal route. The operative time was 175 min, and there was 61 m L of intra-operative bleeding. A histopathological examination revealed superficial adenocarcinoma in LSBE. Our surgical procedure provided a good surgical view and can be safely applied to patients with a hiatal hernia and kyphosis.     

Evaluation of the quality of life after surgical treatment for thoracic esophageal cancer

Background Surgical treatment for thoracic esophageal cancer is highly invasive. The importance of evaluating the postoperative quality of life (QOL) is beginning to be recognized. Methods We reviewed the QOL of 46 patients who had undergone thoracolaparotomy for thoracic esophageal cancer using questionnaires (a questionnaire prepared at our department and the scale of health-related QOL [sf36v-2]) and respiratory function tests. Results (1) Results of the sf36v-2: there was no significant difference other than score of bodily pain (BP) and score of role, physical (RP). (2) Results of our questionnaire: (2-1) activity: the activity level recovered nearly to the preoperative level in 70% of the patients after a mean of 10.4 months post-esophagectomy. (2-2) Wounds: none of the patients complained of chronic pain or inconvenience in daily living. (2-3) Eating: the mean quantity of food per meal was about 2/3 of the quantity before surgery. Seventeen patients felt some problems concerning the passage of food through the site of anastomosis. A mean weight loss of about 7 kg was observed after surgery compared with the preoperative level. (3) Results of respiratory function tests: significant differences were observed in % vital capacity and % maximum ventilation volume but not in forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with the preoperative levels (P < 0.01). Conclusions The postoperative QOL of patients who underwent esophagectomy was maintained at a satisfactory level. Their respiratory function was slightly reduced compared with the preoperative level, but their daily activities were similar to those of healthy people, and their eating problems were tolerable.     

A case of surgical treatment for extensive corrosive stricture of esophagus and stomach after ingestion of strong hydroxide

A 29-year-old woman who swallowed oil cleaner (strong hydroxide: NaOH) by mistake received conservative therapy because of having neither mediastinitis nor peritonitis. She complained of dysphagia 1?month after ingestion. Upper gastrointestinal series showed severe stricture in the middle and lower thoracic esophagus and in the antrum of the stomach. Gastrostomy and jejunostomy were performed on the 87th day after ingestion. Transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy and total gastrectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction using the colon with microvascular anastomosis through a retrosternal route was performed on the 148th day after the ingestion. On open thoracotomy, although dense mediastinal adhesions were found around the esophagus, esophagectomy could be achieved successfully. She was discharged 22?days after the second surgery without postoperative complication.     

Minimally invasive esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy,a symptom assessment study

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is used with hope to decrease the morbidity associated with an open esophagectomy. Reflux and dumping syndromes are the most important functional complaints in patients after esophagectomy. This study compares the functional benefits of MIE with open esophagectomy. The study enrolled patients who underwent either minimally invasive or open esophagectomy for cancer between 2004 and 2009. No patients in the MIE group had a pyloroplasty or myotomy. Each patient in the MIE group was paired to a patient in the open esophagectomy group via propensity matching. Matching variables included age, race, gender, preoperative treatment, history of prior cancer, American Society of Anesthesiologists Risk Scale, performance status, clinical stage, body mass index, histology, level of anastomosis, and time elapsed since surgery. The patients were asked to answer 26 questions about their reflux and dumping using validated questionnaires. A total of 181 patients were included in the study. From this group, 44 pairs of patients were created and used for the analysis. The median follow‐up was 12.1 months for the MIE group and 18.3 months for the open group. The reflux score was slightly worse in the MIE group (5.5 versus 3.5, P= 0.021). There was no difference in the dumping symptoms between the two groups. The most common complaints seen in the dumping questionnaire in almost one‐third of all patients were early satiety, abdominal discomfort, nausea, and diarrhea. Of the patients, 77% were satisfied or very satisfied with their condition in the MIE group compared with 93% in the open group (P= 0.287). Reflux, dumping, and overall satisfaction after MIE without pyloroplasty are comparable with those obtained after open esophagectomy with a pyloric drainage procedure.     

Transthoracal partial resection or local excision of small esophageal carcinoma with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy--proposal of limited operation for postoperative quality of life

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Controversy remains regarding which treatment should be employed for superficial esophageal cancer. The treatment modalities for such superficial cancers vary from a local excision, including an endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to an extended radical esophagectomy (three-field lymphadenectomy). In the current report, we proposed the use of either a transthoracal partial resection or local excision of the esophagus with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy for the patients with small superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, in order to perform effective radical cancer surgery and maintain the quality of life (QOL) of the patients. METHODOLOGY: Surgical procedures: After thoracotomy and detaching of the esophagus from the surrounding tissues, the proximal and distal resection lines were determined by careful palpation of the clips within the esophagus which had been placed during the preoperative endoscopic examination. Thereafter, a mediastinal lymph node dissection, including the bilateral recurrent nerve nodes and paratracheal nodes, was performed. After this procedure, intrathoracic esophageal end-to-end anastomosis was performed in the ordinary manner. We performed this procedure on three patients with small localized esophageal cancer. RESULTS: Operations were safely performed on these three patients and postoperative quality of life was almost satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Transthoracal partial resection or local excision with a radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy was useful for the patients with small localized esophageal carcinoma.     

Synchronous double primary cancer of the esophagus and ampulla of Vater successfully treated by a two-stage operation: report of a case

A 68-year-old man was diagnosed with local recurrent cancer of the ampulla of Vater by follow-up endoscopy 3 years after an endoscopic papillectomy. A screening endoscopy found superficial middle thoracic esophageal cancer. The patient required an esophagectomy and pancreatoduodenectomy. We chose a two-stage operation for the esophageal cancer and the local recurrent cancer of the ampulla of Vater, both to reduce surgical invasiveness and to circumvent the lower curability. The first-stage operation consisted of a right transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy with mediastinal and cervical lymph node dissection, external esophagostomy of the neck, and gastrostomy. Forty days after the first surgery, a gastroduodenal artery- and right gastroepiploic vessel-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy with Child’s reconstruction was performed as the second-stage surgery. Esophageal reconstruction was achieved using a gastric tube via the percutaneous route with vascular anastomosis.     

The pattern of lymphatic metastases in superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lymphatic spread patterns in relation to the location of primary tumors of the superficial thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma have not been well established. We therefore analyzed patterns of lymph node metastasis in these patients. METHODOLOGY: We reviewed medical records of 65 patients who underwent systematic three-field dissection for superficial squamous carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus from 1993 through 2000. RESULTS: Lymph node involvement was found in 0% (0/13) and 44% (23/52) of patients whose tumor invaded the muscularis mucosa and submucosal layer, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 77% in the node-negative group and 59% in the node-positive group (P<0.05). None of the patients with upper thoracic esophageal cancer had metastasis to the mediastinal and abdominal nodes. Patients with lower thoracic esophageal tumors (Lt) had no metastasis to the cervical nodes. Patients with middle thoracic esophageal tumors (Mt) and Lt patients rarely had metastasis (2-5%) in the lower mediasinal nodes (Nos. 108-112). No patient with superficial thoracic esophageal cancer had metastasis to the subcarinal nodes in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In our series, no patient with intramucosal carcinoma had lymphatic metastases. Some patients with submucosal cancers metastasized beyond regional lymph nodes. However, this study suggests that subcarinal nodes might not need to be sampled or dissected in patients with superficial carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus. In Mt and Lt patients, metastases to the mediastinal nodes were infrequent (2-7%). Mediastinal nodes other than #107 can easily be sampled through cervical and abdominal incisions. Therefore, combined with lymph node sampling in cervical, mediasinal and abdominal stations through cervical and abdominal incisions, esophagectomy without thoracotomy might be acceptable in Mt and Lt patients with superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.     

Reflux esophagitis and columnar‐lined esophagus after cervical esophagogastrostomy (following esophagectomy)

Reflux esophagitis (RE) and columnar‐lined esophagus (CLE) are frequently observed after esophagectomy. The incidence of these conditions according to time and to the route of esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to clarify any changes and differences of the incidence of RE and CLE in patients who underwent gastric tube reconstruction after esophagectomy. A hundred patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy after resection of the thoracic esophagus were included in this study. We reviewed their endoscopic findings at 1 month, at 1 year and at 2 years after surgery, and compared the incidence rates of RE and CLE with the passage of time and among the three reconstruction routes; a subcutaneous route, a retrosternal route, and a posterior mediastinal route. The incidence rate of RE was 42%, 37% and 38%, at 1 month, 1 year and at 2 years after surgery, respectively. There was no significant difference in the incidence of RE according to the time after surgery. The incidence rate of severe RE (Grade C and D in the Los Angeles Classification) was 9% percent at 1 month after surgery, 18% at 1 year after surgery and 22% at 2 years after surgery, significantly increasing with passage of time. The incidence rate of CLE was 0% at 1 month after surgery, 14% at 1 year after surgery and 40% at 2 years after surgery, significantly increasing with passage of time. No difference was observed in the incidence of RE and that of CLE among the three routes of esophageal reconstruction. Severe RE and CLE increase with passage of time after cervical esophagogastrostomy. Therefore, careful endoscopic follow‐up is necessary for such patients irrespective of the route of esophageal reconstruction.     

Factors influencing the development of Barrett's epithelium in the esophageal remnant postesophagectomy

BACKGROUND: Barrett's esophagus results from chronic reflux of both acid and bile. Reflux of gastric and duodenal contents is facilitated through the denervated stomach following esophagectomy, but the development of Barrett's changes in this model and the relationship to gastric and esophageal physiology is poorly understood. AIMS: To document the development of new Barrett's changes, i.e., columnar metaplasia or specialized intestinal metaplasia (SIM) above the anastomosis, and relate this to the recovery of gastric acid production, acid and bile reflux, manometry, and symptoms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients at a median follow-up of 26 months (range = 12-67) postesophagectomy underwent endoscopy with biopsies taken 1-2 cm above the anastomosis. The indication for esophagectomy had been adenocarcinoma (n = 27), high-grade dysplasia (n = 2), and squamous cell cancer (n = 19). Physiology studies were performed in 27 patients and included manometry (n = 25), intraluminal gastric pH (n = 24), as well as simultaneous 24-hour esophageal pH (n = 27) and bile monitoring (n = 20). RESULTS: Duodenogastric reflux increased over time, with differences between patients greater than and less than 3 years postesophagectomy for acid (p = 0.04) and bile (p = 0.02). Twenty-four patients (50%) developed columnar metaplasia and of these 13 had SIM. The prevalence of columnar metaplasia did not relate to the magnitude of acid or bile reflux, to preoperative neoadjuvant therapies, or to the original tumor histology. The duration of reflux was most significant, with increasing prevalence over time, with SIM in 13 patients at a median of 61 months postesophagectomy compared with 20 months in the 35 patients who were SIM-negative (p < 0.006). Supine reflux correlated with symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: The development of Barrett's epithelium is frequent after esophagectomy, is time-related, reflecting chronic acid and bile exposure, and is not specific for adenocarcinoma or the presence of previous Barrett's epithelium. This model may represent a useful in vivo model of the pathogenesis of Barrett's metaplasia and tumorigenesis.     

Comparison between different reconstruction routes in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

AIM:To compare postoperative complications and prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients treated with different routes of reconstruction. METHODS:After obtaining approval from the Medical Ethics Committee of the Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, we retrospectively reviewed data from 306 consecutive patients with histologically diagnosed esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated between 2001 and 2011. All patients underwent radical McKeown-type esophagectomy with at least two-field lymphadenectomy. Regular follow-up was performed in our outpatient department. Postoperative complica-tions and long-term survival were analyzed by treatment modality, baseline patient characteristics, and operative procedure. Data from patients treated via the retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes were compared. RESULTS:The posterior mediastinal and retrosternal reconstruction routes were employed in 120 and 186 patients, respectively. Pulmonary complications were the most common complications experienced during the postoperative period (46.1% of all patients; 141/306). Compared to the retrosternal route, the posterior mediastinal reconstruction route was associated with a lower incidence of anastomotic stricture (15.8% vs 27.4%, P = 0.018) and less surgical bleeding (242.8 ± 114.2 mL vs 308.2 ± 168.4 mL, P 0.001). The median survival time was 26.8 mo (range:1.6-116.1 mo). Upon uni/multivariate analysis, a lower preoperative albumin level (P = 0.009) and a more advanced pathological stage (pT; P = 0.006; pN; P 0.001) were identified as independent factors predicting poor prognosis. The reconstruction route did not influence prognosis (P = 0.477). CONCLUSION:The posterior mediastinal route of reconstruction reduces incidence of postoperative complications but does not affect survival. This route is recommended for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.     

Functional Outcome of Gastrointestinal Tract and Quality of Life After Esophageal Reconstruction of Esophagus Cancer

Background/Aim:

Information about functional outcome and quality of life after esophagectomy and esophageal reconstruction (ER) for the treatment of esophageal cancer, as evaluated by the patients themselves is limited. We aimed to study the post-surgical outcome of such patients to detect for the development of any complications that may arise from the surgery as well as to evaluate their quality of life following the surgery.

Methods:

From 1993 to 2003, 240 patients with stage I, II, or III esophageal carcinoma underwent esophagectomy at Razi Teaching Hospital located in the north of Iran. Of these, 192 patients filled out a questionnaire during a 2-year period (ranging from 12 to 48 months after surgical reconstruction). Among them, there were 134 men (69%) and 58 women (31%), and the mean age at the time of ER was 48 years (ranging from 22 to 75 years). Transhiatal esophagectomy, extended esophagectomy (three field operation), and Ivor-Lewis resection were done in 142 (73.95%), 30 (15.62%), and 20 patients (10.42%), respectively. Intestinal continuity after esophageal resection was established with stomach in 154 patients (80%), colon in 28 patients (14%), and small bowel in 10 patients (5.2%). Cervical anastomosis was established in 172 patients (89.6%), while intrathoracic anastomosis was performed in 20 patients (10.4%).

Results:

After ER, 66 patients (34.4%) suffered from dysphagia to solids and 50 patients (26%) required at least one or three postoperative dilatations for alleviation of symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux was seen in 32 patients (16.66%) and was more common in thoracic anastomosis patients than in cervical anastomosis patients. Heartburn was present in 33 cases (17%), 30 of whom required medication (37%). The number of meals per day was three to four in 116 patients (60%), more than four in 51 patients (29%), and less than three in 19 patients (9.82%). The number of bowel movement per day increased in 52 patients (27%), decreased in 60 cases (31%), and unchanged in 80 patients (41%). Weight gain was reported by 38 patients (19.8%), and weight loss was reported by 50 patients (26%). No change in weight occurred in 100 patients (52%). Overall satisfaction was excellent in 29 patients (15%). Overall quality of life (work, pain-relief, vitality, and emotional status) was lower than in general population. Age, sex, and stage of cancer did not affect the functional outcome but affected the quality of life. Also patients who received cervical anastomosis and ER with colon had significantly fewer reflux symptoms. Most of the patients with colon reconstruction gained weight.

Conclusions:

Self-assessment of postoperative ER by the patients after esophagectomy for malignant disease demonstrates that undesirable symptoms are frequently present at short- and long-term follow-ups. Short- and long-term functional outcome is affected by the type of reconstruction after esophagectomy. Results of this study suggest that colon graft in ER is significantly advantageous compared with other methods because of the ability of patients to gain weight and avoid developing postoperative reflux.     

A comparative study of the lengths of different reconstruction routes used after thoracic esophagectomy

Background

A challenge in esophageal reconstruction after esophagectomy is that the distance from the neck to the abdomen must be replaced with a long segment obtained from the gastrointestinal tract. The success or failure of the reconstruction depends on the blood flow to the reconstructed organ and the tension on the anastomotic site, both of which depend on the reconstruction distance. There are three possible esophageal reconstruction routes: posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, and subcutaneous. However, there is still no consensus as to which route is the shortest.

Methods

The length of each reconstruction route was retrospectively compared using measurements obtained during surgery, where the strategy was to pull up the gastric conduit through the shortest route. The proximal reference point was defined as the left inferior border of the cricoid cartilage and the distal reference point was defined as the superior border of the duodenum arising from the head of the pancreas.

Results

This study involved 112 Japanese patients with esophageal cancer (102 men, 10 women). The mean distances of the posterior mediastinal, retrosternal, and subcutaneous routes were 34.7?±?2.37 cm, 32.4?±?2.24 cm, and 36.3?±?2.27 cm, respectively. The retrosternal route was significantly shorter than the other two routes (both p?<?0.0001) and shorter by 2.31 cm on average than the posterior mediastinal route. The retrosternal route was longer than the posterior mediastinal route in only 5 patients, with a difference of less than 1 cm.

Conclusion

The retrosternal route was the shortest for esophageal reconstruction in living Japanese patients.

     

What influences the acidity in the gastric conduit in patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy for cancer?

The aim of this study was to determine the factors influencing acidity in the gastric conduit after esophagectomy for cancer. Acidity and bile reflux in the stomach and in the gastric conduit were examined by 24‐h pH monitoring and bilimetry in 40 patients who underwent transthoracic subtotal esophagectomy followed by esophageal reconstruction using a gastric conduit, which was pulled up to the neck through a posterior mediastinal route in 17 patients, through a retrosternal route in 10 patients, and through a subcutaneous route in 13 patients. They were examined at 1 week before surgery, at 1 month after surgery, and at 1 year after surgery. Helicobacter pylori infection was examined pathologically and using the ¹³C‐urea breath test. The factors influencing acidity of the gastric conduit were analyzed using the stepwise regression model. Gastric acidity assessed by percentage (%) time of pH < 4 was reduced after surgery and was significantly less in patients with H. pylori infection compared with those without H. pylori infection throughout the period from 1 week before surgery to 1 year after surgery. Duodenogastric reflux (DGR) assessed by % time absorbance > 0.14 into the lower portion of the gastric conduit was significantly increased after surgery throughout the period from 1 month after surgery to 1 year after surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that the acidity in the gastric conduit was influenced by H. pylori infection and DGR at 1 month after surgery, and by H. pylori infection and the route for esophageal reconstruction at 1 year after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit was significantly decreased after surgery. Acidity in the gastric conduit for esophageal substitutes is influenced by H. pylori infection and surgery. DGR influences the gastric acidity in the short‐term after surgery, but not in the long‐term after surgery.     

Prospective endoscopic follow-up results of reconstructed gastric tube

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Recent advances in the treatment of esophageal cancer have afforded better prognosis for patients. Despite the increased need to monitor the progress of patients with reconstructed digestive tracts over the long-term, no reliable prospective studies have yet been conducted. This prospective study determined secondary disease of the reconstructed gastric tube after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and fourteen patients who underwent esophagectomy and reconstructed gastric tube via the posterior mediastinal route between April 1992 and March 1999 at Akita University Hospital, were followed up. Follow-up endoscopy was carried out once a year to determine the incidence and characteristics of secondary disease of the reconstructed gastric tube. RESULTS: Fifty-four (47%) patients were found to have secondary gastric abnormalities. Of these, 4 patients (3.5%) had carcinoma of the gastric tube, 12 patients (10.5%) had benign gastric tumor, 7 patients (6.1%) had gastric ulcers, and 40 patients (35.1%) had erosive or hemorrhagic gastritis. Three patients found to have early gastric cancer upon periodic follow-up endoscopy underwent successful complete resections. CONCLUSIONS: Annual follow-up endoscopy is vital to the detection of early, curative secondary gastric cancer and ulceration in patients following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.     

Successful management of esophageal necrosis after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for ruptured traumatic aortic aneurysm

A 65-year-old man reported nausea and anorexia after falling down a flight of stairs. Computed tomography (CT) showed a ruptured descending thoracic aortic aneurysm, and emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) was performed. However, after resuming food intake, the patient developed a fever. CT scan showed severe pneumomediastinum and a mediastinal abscess, and the patient was diagnosed with esophageal perforation. Emergency esophagectomy was performed, with an esophageal fistula made at the cervix. Jejunostomy was then performed to enable enteral nutrition. Histological examination showed substantial necrosis at the middle intrathoracic esophagus, and the patient was diagnosed with esophageal necrosis leading to perforation. Five months after the esophagectomy, gastric conduit reconstruction through the retrosternal route was performed. The patient was able to resume food intake, and survived more than 1 year after this surgery. Here, we describe the successful management of this rare case of esophageal necrosis after TEVAR for ruptured traumatic aortic aneurysm.