U.S. Multicenter Pilot Study of Daily Consensus Interferon (CIFN) Plus Ribavirin for ��Difficult-to-Treat�� HCV Genotype 1 Patients

Background

Patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 (HCV-1) and difficult-to-treat characteristics respond poorly to pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV), and could benefit from an interferon with increased activity (consensus interferon or CIFN), favorable viral kinetics from daily dosing, and a longer duration of therapy. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the efficacy and safety of daily CIFN + RBV for initial treatment of patients with HCV-1 infection.

Methods

Patients with difficult-to-treat characteristics (92% male, 33% African American, 78% Veterans Affairs [VA]; 67% high viral load, 59% stage 3?C4 fibrosis, and mean weight of 204 lbs) were enrolled at seven VA and two community medical centers. They were randomized to daily CIFN (15 mcg/day SQ) and RBV (1?C1.2 g/d PO) given for either 52 weeks (group A, n = 33) or 52?C72 weeks (from time of viral response +48 weeks) (group B, n = 31).

Results

Intention to treat analysis for treatment groups A and B demonstrated 33% (11/33) and 32% (10/31) sustained virologic response (SVR), respectively. Only 2/31 patients in group B received more than 52 weeks of treatment. The overall group demonstrated a 31% (20/64) rapid virologic response rate (RVR), 54% (34/64) end of treatment virologic response and a 33% (21/64) SVR. Patients with RVR at 4 weeks, early virologic response from 8?C12 weeks, and late virologic response from 16?C24 weeks demonstrated SVR of 75% (15/20), 31% (4/13), and 22% (2/9), respectively. Overall early non-protocol discontinuation occurred in 26/64 (40%) patients.

Conclusion

Daily CIFN and ribavirin for initial treatment of HCV-1 patients has potential for achieving a relatively high RVR rate, but discontinuations are frequent and successful use of this regimen is highly dependent on adequate patient support to maintain adherence.     

The efficacy of extended treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1 and slow virologic response in Japan

Background

Which patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 can benefit from extended treatment with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin is unknown, although the overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate has been shown to improve in patients with a late virologic response (LVR), defined as detectable serum HCV RNA at week 12 and undetectable at week 24.

Methods

Among 1163 chronic hepatitis C patients with genotype 1 treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy, 213 patients with an LVR were examined in this study. In addition, we selected 81 patients of matched sex and age from each of the 48- and 72-week treatment groups, using the propensity score, to compare the efficacy of the two treatment durations.

Results

With 72-week treatment, the timing of HCV RNA disappearance and the hemoglobin level at baseline showed a strong correlation with the SVR on multivariate analysis. Earlier HCV RNA disappearance was associated with a better SVR rate, regardless of the ribavirin dose (HCV RNA disappearance at week 16, 74%; at week 20, 52%; and at week 24, 31%, p?=?0.01). The SVR rate with 72-week treatment was higher than that with 48-week treatment, irrespective of age, sex, or the platelet value, and, especially in aged patients (??65?years old), the SVR rate increased markedly with 72-week treatment (48?weeks, 25% vs. 72?weeks, 56%; p?Conclusions An earlier response predicts a higher SVR rate in patients with an LVR given 72-week treatment. Extended treatment with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin for patients with an LVR improved the treatment efficacy, even for aged patients.     

Extended treatment with pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin in patients with genotype 2/3 chronic hepatitis C who do not achieve a rapid virological response: final analysis of the randomised N-CORE trial

Background and aims

The combination of pegylated interferon alfa/ribavirin will likely remain the treatment of choice for HCV genotype 2/3 patients in financially constrained countries for the foreseeable future. Patients with poor on-treatment response may benefit from treatment extension. This study examined the effect of 48 versus 24 weeks of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin on the sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 2/3 who did not achieve rapid virological response (RVR).

Methods

N-CORE was a multicentre, randomised, phase III study. HCV genotype 2/3 patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin without a rapid but with an early virological response were randomised at week 24 to stop treatment (Arm A) or continue to 48 weeks (Arm B). The primary efficacy endpoint was SVR.

Results

Two hundred thirty-five patients were enrolled. End of treatment response was similar in both treatment arms. SVR24 rates were not significantly greater in the extended treatment arm compared with the standard 24-week treatment in either the intention-to-treat or the per-protocol populations (61 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1934 and 63 vs. 52 %, p = 0.1461, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred more frequently in patients receiving extended treatment duration (12 %) versus 24-week therapy (4 %).

Conclusions

It is unclear whether the extension of peginterferon alfa-2a/ribavirin treatment may benefit HCV genotype 2/3 patients who do not achieve RVR. The study was stopped early because recruitment was slower than anticipated, and this may have limited the statistical impact of these findings.     

Efficacy of re-treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Background

It is still not known which patients with chronic hepatitis C who failed to respond to previous pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin therapy can benefit from re-treatment.

Methods

Seventy-four patients (HCV genotype 1, n?=?56, genotype 2, n?=?18) were re-treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin.

Results

On re-treatment, the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 41% for genotype 1 and 56% for genotype 2. With genotype 1, the factors associated with an SVR were previous treatment response and the serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level at the start of re-treatment. Patients with a ???2-log decrease in HCV RNA at week 12 (partial early virologic response, p-EVR) in previous treatment had significantly higher SVR rates than those without these decreases (p?10 IU/ml of HCV RNA at the start of re-treatment attained an SVR (6/6), while only 33% (15/45) of those patients with ??5 log₁₀ IU/ml of HCV RNA attained an SVR (p?p?=?0.01).

Conclusions

Re-treatment of genotype 1 patients should be limited to patients with a p-EVR in the previous treatment and a low HCV RNA level at the start of re-treatment. In re-treatment with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin, longer treatment duration can contribute to increasing the anti-viral effect.     

Using early viral kinetics to predict antiviral outcome in response-guided pegylated interferon plus ribavirin therapy among patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1

Background

HCV kinetics during treatment demonstrated strong association with the antiviral outcome of patients treated with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin. However, the relationship between HCV kinetics and pre-treatment factors remains unclear.

Methods

Of 547 patients with HCV genotype 1 treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin, 401 completed the response-guided therapy and were assessed for per protocol analysis.

Results

The sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 53 % for all patients, 60 % for those with genotype TT, and 19 % for those with genotype TG/GG according to IL28B (rs8099917) single nucleotide polymorphisms. The SVR rates increased with HCV decrease at week 4; 4 % (2/56) with <1 log₁₀ decrease, 13 % (7/56) with 1–2 log₁₀ decrease, 51 % (44/87) with 2–3 log₁₀ decrease, 64 % (56/87) with 3–4 log₁₀ decrease, 88 % (72/82) with more than 4 log₁₀ decrease but with detectable HCV RNA and 100 % (33/33) with undetectable HCV RNA (p < 0.001). Similarly, SVR rates increased step-by-step in proportion to HCV decrease in both IL28B TT and TG/GG groups, showing almost the same SVR rates for the same conditions. In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.005) and the magnitude of HCV decrease at week 4 (p < 0.001) but not IL28B were associated with SVR. Advanced liver fibrosis (p = 0.004) and the magnitude of HCV decrease at week 4 (p < 0.001) but not IL28B were associated with non-response.

Conclusions

The magnitude of the HCV decrease at week 4 seems to be the most reliable marker for predicting antiviral outcome after starting Peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy.     

Treatment of chronic genotype-3 hepatitis C virus infection using direct-acting antiviral agents: An Indian experience

Background

Direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) are favored for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, the experience with the DAAs currently available in India in the treatment of genotype-3 HCV is limited. We therefore reviewed our experience with these drugs in treating patients with chronic genotype-3 HCV infection, including those with cirrhosis.

Methods

We prospectively followed adult patients with genotype-3 HCV infection who had received treatment regimens containing sofosbuvir with/without daclatasvir. Patients were categorized as chronic hepatitis C (CHC), compensated cirrhosis (CC), and decompensated cirrhosis (DC). They received either (i) sofosbuvir and ribavirin, with or without pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) for 12 or 24 weeks, or (ii) sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, with or without ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks. Response was assessed using HCV RNA testing after 2 or 4 weeks of treatment (rapid virological response [RVR]), at treatment completion (end-of-treatment response [ETR]) or 12 weeks after treatment completion (sustained virological response [SVR12]).

Results

Of the 160 patients (90% treatment-naïve; CHC 49%, CC 32%, and DC 19%), 39 (24%) received Peg-IFN, sofosbuvir and ribavirin, 21 (13%) received sofosbuvir and ribavirin, and 100 (63%) received sofosbuvir and daclatasvir, with or without ribavirin. On intention-to-treat basis, RVR, ETR, and SVR12 in the entire cohort were 146/160 (91.3%), 151/160 (94.4%), and 147/160 (91.9%), respectively. Seven patients died (CC 2, DC 5) during treatment; four (2 CHC, 2 DC) patients discontinued treatment; and two patients with CC relapsed.

Conclusions

Dual-DAA-based regimens were safe and highly effective in treating genotype-3 HCV infection in CHC and CC patients.

     

The safety and efficacy of peginterferon plus ribavirin in hepatitis C patients concomitant with malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study

Purpose

Cancer patients were generally excluded from the therapeutic guidelines of antiviral therapy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiviral therapy in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection concomitant with malignancy other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Twenty-five HCV patients with curative malignancy other than HCC (group A) and 75 sex- and age-matched controls (group B) were recruited into a prospective and case–control analysis. All patients received peginterferon-alpha-2a (PegIFN-alpha-2a) and weight-based ribavirin according to the current treatment recommendations. The primary outcome measurement was sustained virological response (SVR). The safety issue between groups was also compared.

Results

There were 22 (88.0 %) patients of group A and 59 (78.7 %) patients of group B who achieved an SVR (p = 0.39). The SVR rate was comparable between groups both in genotype-1 (HCV-1) (81.8 vs. 72.7 %, p = 0.70) and in genotype-2 (HCV-2) (92.9 vs. 83.3 %, p = 0.66) patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the achievement of a RVR (viral clearance during first 4 weeks of treatment) was the strongest predictor of an SVR (odds ratio/95 % confidence intervals [OR/CI]: 6.357/1.50 ? 26.99, p = 0.01), followed by lower baseline viral loads (OR/CI: 0.403/0.174 ? 0.936, p = 0.034) and higher dose of ribavirin exposure (OR/CI: 1.287/1.092 ? 1.517, p = 0.003), whilst previous occurrence of cancer was not associated with SVR. Treatment adherence (76.0 vs. 72.0 %, p = 0.70) and the incidences of grade 3 or more adverse events (28.0 vs. 20.0 %, p = 0.40) were comparable between two groups.

Conclusions

Chronic hepatitis C patients with non-HCC malignancies receiving peginterferon/ribavirin combination therapy carried favorable efficacy and safety outcomes.     

Early discontinuation of ribavirin in HCV-2 and HCV-3 patients responding to Peg-interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin

Guidelines for the treatment of patients infected with hepatitis C virus of genotypes 2 and 3 (HCV-2 and HCV-3, respectively) recommend a 24-week course of Peg-interferon (Peg-IFN) alpha-2a combined with ribavirin, despite 50% of patients in registration trials attaining a sustained virologic response (SVR) following Peg-IFN alpha-2a monotherapy. The aim of this study was to delineate patient characteristics that might help to identify individuals likely to benefit from ribavirin discontinuation. One hundred and forty-four HCV-2- and HCV-3-infected patients initiated Peg-IFN alpha-2a (180 microg/week) and ribavirin (1000 or 1200 mg/day); those with viral clearance at week 4 were randomized to either Peg-IFN alpha-2a monotherapy (n = 59) or continuing combination therapy (n = 61) until week 12. Overall, all but one patient with a rapid virologic response (RVR) responded by the end of therapy and the overall SVR rates were lower after discontinuation of ribavirin (54%vs 82%; P < 0.001). In RVR patients who discontinued ribavirin, low baseline viraemia helped predict SVR (odds ratio 11.2, 95% CI 2.7-47.1). SVR rates were similar in patients receiving mono- or combination therapy with low (< or =300,000 IU/mL) and intermediate viraemia (86%vs 81% and 70%vs 71%, 86% refers to low viraemic patients receiving monotherapy and 81% to those receiving combination therapy. Similarly, 70% refers to patients with intermediate viraemic levels receiving monotherapy and 71% to those receiving combination therapy), but different in those with high (>700,000 IU/mL) viraemia (37%vs 88%; P = 0.004). Thus in HCV-2- and HCV-3-infected patients, withdrawal of ribavirin and continuation of Peg-IFN alpha-2a monotherapy may be appropriate to attain an SVR, providing viraemia is cleared early during therapy and associated with low baseline viral load. These results warrant future investigations, as discontinuing ribavirin could lead to considerable savings in cost and quality of life related to over-treatment.     

European vs. Egyptian HCV-4 patients with elevated baseline HCV RNA, treated with PEG-IFN-α2a and ribavirin: the role of rapid and early virologic response

Background and Aims

Despite the recent spread of hepatitis C virus genotype 4 (HCV-4) into European countries, very little is known about the influence of ethnicity on treatment outcomes in patients with HCV-4. The aim of this study was to compare the virologic response (VR) rates of: rapid virologic response (RVR), early virologic response (EVR), VR at 24 weeks of treatment, at end of treatment (EoT), and sustained virologic response (SVR) of European and Egyptian HCV-4 patients.

Methods

Sixty (30 Europeans – Group A; and 30 Egyptians – Group B) chronic HCV-4 subtype A adult patients with elevated baseline viral load (>800 000 IU/m L) were treated for a fixed period of 48 weeks with pegylated interferon α2a (PEG-IFN- α2a) and ribavirin. During the study, HCV-RNA levels were measured at weeks 4,12,24,48 and 72.

Results

Baseline characteristics, including liver histology, were similar in the two groups. RVR, EVR and HCV-RNA at week 24 in Groups A and B were (RVR 26.7% vs. 30.0%) (EVR 23.3% vs. 16.7%) (in week 24 13.3% vs. 16.7%). Overall SVR rates were 36.7% (11/30) for Group A and 26.7% (8/30) for Group B (P = 0.59). For group B, RVR was the weakest indicator for SVR as compared with RVR of group A, where RVR was the best SVR indicator

Conclusions

The overall response to treatment was similar, but ethnic origin or previous history and treatment of schistosomiasis may influence intermediate response rates of chronic HCV-4a infected patients with elevated baseline HCV-RNA.     

Meta-analysis: mortality and serious adverse events of peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Background

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is the current standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Determining precisely the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality from a single study is rather difficult because of the infrequency of such events. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the rates of SAEs and the mortality of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy in a pooled large sample, and to assess the relationship between SAEs and mortality rates and therapeutic characteristics.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. We calculated the crude mortality and SAE rates with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Eighty studies with 153 treatment arms that included 27569 patients were enrolled (14401 patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a/RBV and 13168 with Peg-IFN alpha-2b/RBV). All-cause and treatment-related deaths were observed in 50 (0.18 %; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.24 %) and sixteen (0.058 %; 95 % CI 0.033–0.094 %) patients, respectively. The crude SAE rate was 7.08 % (95 % CI 6.75–7.41 %). Subgroup analysis revealed higher SAE rates in patients receiving PEG-IFN alpha-2a than in those with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (7.45 vs. 6.74 %), and higher SAE rates with higher doses than with the lower doses in PEG-IFN-2a and 2b (11.94 vs. 6.99 %, 7.10 vs. 5.05 %, respectively), and with extended duration (>48 weeks) than with standard duration (48 weeks) (15.5 vs. 6.67 %) in PEG-IFN alpha-2a.

Conclusion

The mortality rate during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was acceptably low, but the rate of SAEs was not negligible in a treatment for a benign disease, and the rate was affected by treatment regimens.     

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in treatment-naïve ‘real-life’ patients in India

Purpose/Aim

Results of treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (PEG-RBV) are mainly available from well-designed clinical trials, and only few ‘real-life’ studies which give a true picture of success of therapy are available. Such data in Indian patients is scarce. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and factors associated with sustained virological response (SVR) in Indian CHC patients treated with PEG-RBV in ‘real-life’ setting.

Material and Methods

All treatment-naïve patients with CHC/compensated cirrhosis treated with PEG-RBV between January 2004 and December 2010 were included.

Results

Of 592 patients started on treatment, 524 (88.5 %) completed therapy (mean?±?SD age—42.0?±?12.1 years; 74.3 % males). Genotype 3 (73.6 %) was the commonest, followed by genotype 1 (19.3 %). In intention to treat analysis, SVR rates for ‘all’ patients, genotype 1 and genotype 3 patients were 72.3 % (428/592), 57 % (65/114), and 78.2 % (341/436), respectively (in per-protocol analysis—81.7 %, 69.1 %, and 85.3 %, respectively). Noncirrhotics had better SVR rates compared to cirrhotics treated for the same duration. About 20 % patients had both low viral load and achieved rapid virological response (RVR). Factors significantly associated with SVR were age <40 years, absence of cirrhosis, RVR, and no reduction in interferon dose.

Conclusion

SVR rates in CHC patients treated in ‘real-life’ setting in India were better than those reported in western population. Therapy should be prolonged for patients with cirrhosis, while one-fifth of patients may qualify for abbreviated therapy. Factors significantly associated with SVR were age <40 years, absence of cirrhosis, RVR, and no reduction in interferon dose.     

Meta-analysis of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 6: 48 weeks with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is superior to 24 weeks

Background

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 (HCV-6) is common in patients from Southeast Asia and the surrounding regions. Optimal treatment duration for HCV-6 is unknown given the inconclusive evidence from studies with varying methodologies and small sample sizes.

Methods

A literature search for ‘genotype 6’ in MEDLINE and EMBASE in October 2013 produced 161 and 251 articles, respectively. Additional abstracts were identified from four major international GI/liver conferences in 2012/2013. Inclusion criteria were original studies with ≥10 HCV-6 treatment-naïve patients treated with pegylated interferon + ribavirin (PEG IFN+RBV). Exclusion criteria were coinfections with HBV, HIV, other HCV genotypes, and/or other liver diseases. Primary outcome was pooled sustained virologic response (SVR). Heterogeneity was defined by Cochrane Q test (p value of 0.10) and I ² statistic (≥50 %).

Results

A total of 13 studies with 641 patients were included. The pooled SVR estimate was 77 % (CI 70–83 %) (Q value = 38.4, p value <0.001, I ² = 68.7 %) overall, 79 % (CI 73–84 %) for the 48-week group and 59 % (CI 46–70 %) for 24-week group, respectively. In studies with direct comparison of the two groups, SVR was superior in patients treated for 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.9 (CI 1.08–3.2, p = 0.026). In studies with direct comparison of patients with rapid virologic response (RVR), there was no difference in SVR between 48 versus 24 weeks, OR 1.74 (CI 0.65–4.64, p = 0.27).

Conclusion

Hepatitis C virus genotype 6 patients should be treated for 48 weeks, and those who achieve RVR may receive the shorter 24-week treatment duration. The high SVR (~80 %) with 48 weeks of PEG IFN+RBV therapy may be a cost-effective option for HCV-6 patients from resource-poor regions.     

Reducing Peg-IFN doses causes later virologic response or no response in HCV genotype 1 patients treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin

Background

The timing to the first undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA level is strongly associated with sustained virologic response in pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) with genotype 1. This study was conducted to clarify the impact of drug exposure to Peg-IFN on the timing of HCV RNA negativity in Peg-IFN plus ribavirin combination therapy for CH-C patients with genotype 1.

Methods

A total of 1409 patients treated with Peg-IFN alfa-2b plus ribavirin were enrolled and classified into four categories according to the Peg-IFN dosage. Furthermore, 100 patients were extracted from each Peg-IFN dosage category to adjust for characteristic factors, using the propensity score method.

Results

Peg-IFN exposure was dose-dependently associated with the timing of HCV RNA negativity (p????0.001). The HCV RNA negative rate at week 4 decreased from 12% with a Peg-IFN dose of >1.5???g/kg/week to 1?C3% with a dose of <1.5???g/kg/week (p????0.001), and at week 12 the rate had decreased from 44% with a dose of ??1.2???g/kg/week to 18% with a dose of <1.2???g/kg/week (p?=?0.001). Treatment failure (patients without a 1-log decrease of HCV RNA at week 4 or a 2-log decrease of HCV RNA at week 12, or positive at week 24) was found in 54?C66% of patients given <1.2???g/kg/week (p????0.001), and these patients accounted for 64% of the non-responders.

Conclusions

The timing of HCV RNA negativity depends significantly on the Peg-IFN dose. Reducing the Peg-IFN dose can induce a later virologic response or non-response in HCV genotype 1 patients treated with Peg-IFN plus ribavirin.     

Kinetics of hepatitis C virus RNA load during pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin treatment in naïve genotype 1 patients

Background

Pegylated interferon given for 24 or 48 weeks constitutes the most effective initial therapy for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. It has been shown that viral load at week 2 appears the best time for predicting response to treatment. The objectives of this study were to assess whether the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral decline is predictive of sustained virological response (SVR) and to determine the best time for predicting complete response in our cohort of naïve patients treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a (Peg-IFN alpha-2a) and ribavirin.

Results

Twenty patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks were studied. Six months after the end of treatment, a SVR (negative HCV RNA measured by PCR six months after the end of therapy) was obtained in 9 patients. Samples were obtained before and at week 2, 4, 8, and 12. At the end of week 2, viral load decreased more than 1.39 log in 8 out of the 9 patients with SVR and in 1 out of the 11 other patients. When we considered the viral load reduction from baseline to each week of treatment, week 2 appeared to be the best point time for predicting SVR, with a sensitivity of 91% (95%CI: 59;99), a specificity of 89% (52;98), a positive predictive value of 91% (59;99) and a negative predictive value of 89% (57;98).

Conclusion

During treatment with Peg-IFN alpha-2a plus ribavirin in genotype 1 patients, when the main objective of the treatment is viral eradication, viral kinetics showed that week 2 appeared to be the best time point for predicting SVR. Our results must be further confirmed on a larger cohort.

     

Predictive value of FIB-4 and APRI versus METAVIR on sustained virologic response in genotype 1 hepatitis C patients

Purpose

Advanced liver fibrosis is a negative predictor of virologic response in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. Biopsy, however, is invasive, costly, and carries some risk of complications.

Methods

Using data from the prospective, international cohort study PROPHESYS, we assessed two alternative noninvasive measures of fibrosis, the FIB-4 and AST-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), to predict virologic response in CHC patients.

Results

CHC genotype 1, monoinfected, treatment-naive patients prescribed peginterferon alfa-2a (40 KD)/ribavirin in accordance with country-specific legal and regulatory requirements and who had baseline METAVIR, FIB-4, and APRI scores (N = 1,592) were included in this analysis. Patients were stratified according to the baseline METAVIR, FIB-4, or APRI score to assess virologic response [hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA <50 IU/mL] by week 4 of treatment (rapid virologic response) and 24 weeks after untreated follow-up ]sustained virologic response (SVR)]. Baseline predictors of SVR were explored by multiple logistic regression, and the strength of the association between each fibrosis measure and SVR was evaluated. Both FIB-4 and APRI scores increased with increasing levels of biopsy-assessed fibrosis. The association between FIB-4 and SVR (p < 0.1 × 10^?30) was stronger than that between METAVIR (p = 3.86 × 10^?13) or APRI (p = 5.48 × 10^?6) and SVR. Baseline factors significantly associated with SVR included male gender, lower HCV RNA, lower FIB-4 score, no steatosis, and higher alanine aminotransferase ratio.

Conclusion

The FIB-4 index provides a valuable, noninvasive measure of fibrosis and can be used to predict virologic response in patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a (40  KD)/ribavirin.     

Efficacy of pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for hepatitis C patients with normal ALT levels: a matched case�Ccontrol study

Background

The antiviral effect of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with normal alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels (N-ALT) has been reported to be equivalent to that for patients with elevated ALT levels (E-ALT). However, the actual antiviral effect in N-ALT patients remains obscure because efficacy can be overestimated in patients with an advantageous background.

Methods

In this study, 386 patients were extracted, for a matched case?Ccontrol study, from 1320 CHC patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2b plus ribavirin combination therapy; 193 N-ALT patients [116 with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1), 77 with HCV genotype 2 (HCV-2)] were matched with 193 E-ALT patients by a propensity score method using the variables of age, sex, IFN treatment history, body mass index, and platelet counts.

Results

On multivariate analysis for sustained virological response (SVR) in N-ALT patients, younger age, low HCV RNA level at baseline, and HCV-2 were significant factors. The matched case?Ccontrol study showed that the SVR rates of N-ALT patients were equivalent to those of E-ALT patients; at 49 and 40% in the HCV-1 group (P?=?0.146), and 78 and 81% in the HCV-2 group (P?=?0.691). However, in N-ALT patients with non-SVR, approximately 40% showed ALT elevation at 24?weeks post-treatment.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that the antiviral effect of Peg-IFN plus ribavirin therapy in N-ALT patients is comparable to that for E-ALT patients irrespective of their advantageous background; however, the application of this therapy for N-ALT patients, especially for those with HCV-1, should be considered carefully.     

Response to peginterferon-alpha 2b and ribavirin in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1

Purpose

Patient age and gender may be associated with response to peginterferon alpha plus ribavirin, the current standard of care (SOC) for chronic hepatitis C genotype 1. We queried whether there was an association between age, gender, and treatment response to SOC in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1.

Methods

Between 2006 and 2009, HCV-infected Japanese patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin for 48 weeks were enrolled. Patients were allocated into four groups according to age and gender, and epidemiological data and treatment outcomes were retrospectively analyzed. HCV RNA was measured with COBAS AMPLICOR HCV Monitor Test v. 2.0.

Results

The overall sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 49.8%: patients aged ≤65 and >65 years, 50.9 and 44.0%, respectively; male and female, 56.5 and 39.0%. SVR rates of SOC against HCV genotype-1 females aged >65 years (19.0%) were inferior to those in males aged >65 years (57.8%) in Japan. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that SVR was attained independently of adherence 80/80/80 in all groups.

Conclusions

Adherence to medication is also a key factor for the eradication of HCV in patients aged >65 years. As the SVR rate of patients aged ≤65 years was similar to that of patients aged >65 years, SOC could be useful for treating some of the elderly patients.     

Rapid Virological Response Represents the Highest Prediction Factor of Response to Antiviral Treatment in HCV-Related Chronic Hepatitis: a Multicenter Retrospective Study

Background:

Standard [i.e. pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) + ribavirin] treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related chronic hepatitis is associated with a sustained virological response (SVR) in 50 - 90% of patients. A rapid virological response (RVR) (i.e. negative HCV-RNA after 4 weeks of treatment) predicts SVR in almost 90% of patients.

Objectives:

The main aim of this study was to assess the strength of RVR, as a predictive factor of antiviral treatment response.

Patients and Methods:

Using univariate and multivariate analysis, we retrospectively evaluated biochemical, metabolic, genetic and viral variables that might affect both RVR and SVR to Peg-IFN plus ribavirin, in 315 consecutive outpatients affected by HCV-related chronic hepatitis.

Results:

At univariate analysis, staging, body mass index, RVR, genotype and viral load were significantly related to SVR (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, RVR and genotype remained significant (P < 0.00001). The RVR had a predictive value of 83%. At univariate and multivariate analyses, diabetes (P = 0.003), genotype 2 (P = 0.000) and HCV-RNA values (P = 0.016) were independent predictors of RVR, even though at multivariate analyses, only genotype 2 was significantly related to RVR. When we stratified patients, according to genotype, no laboratory or clinical factors were predictive of RVR in genotype 1 patients at either univariate or multivariate analysis. In genotype 2 patients, staging (P = 0.029) and diabetes (P = 0.001) were the only significant predictors of RVR at univariate analyses, whereas no factor was independently related to RVR, at multivariate analysis.

Conclusions:

The RVR is the strongest factor of SVR and infection with HCV genotype 2 is significantly associated with RVR. Neither biochemical and/or metabolic factors seem to exert influence on RVR.     

Treatment of Genotype 4 Hepatitis C Recurring After Liver Transplantation Using a Combination of Pegylated Interferon Alfa-2a and Ribavirin

Background

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) is universal and tends to be more aggressive. Data on post-transplant HCV genotype 4 treatment is scarce. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of recurrent HCV genotype 4 after LT.

Methods

Twenty-five patients infected with HCV genotype 4 were treated with PEG-IFN alpha-2a at a dose of 180 ??g/week in addition to 800 mg/day of ribavirin (the dose was adjusted within the tolerated range of 400?C1,200 mg). Pretreatment liver biopsies were obtained from all patients. Biochemical and virological markers were assessed before, during, and after treatment.

Results

Twenty-two patients (88%) achieved an early virological response (EVR) (12 patients tested negative for HCV-RNA). Fifteen (60%) and 14 patients (56%) achieved an end of treatment virological response (ETVR) and a sustained virological response (SVR), respectively. Five patients had advanced pretreatment liver fibrosis. Pretreatment ALT was elevated in 24 patients (96%). The most common adverse effects were flu-like symptoms and cytopenia. Eighteen patients (72%) required erythropoietin alpha and/or granulocyte-colony stimulating factor as a supportive measure. One patient developed severe rejection complicated by sepsis, renal failure, and death. Other adverse effects included depression, mild rejection, impotence, itching, and vitiligo.

Conclusions

Post-transplant treatment with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin achieved SVR in 56% of liver transplant recipients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection. The combination was relatively safe and exhibited a low rate of treatment withdrawal.     

Very Low Viral Load (VLVL) Relapse Following Treatment of Naïve Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C

Background

Sustained virologic response (SVR) to treatment of naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is 50–60%. Patients who relapse have a poor response to re-treatment. We report a group of relapse patients with SVR to low-dose re-treatment after 6 months.

Aim

Characterization of HCV relapse patients with very low viral load (VLVL) (HCV RNA <5,000 IU/ml) 6 months after stopping full-dose initial treatment.

Methods

We identified 120 consecutive naïve patients over 4 years treated with pegylated interferon alpha-2a and ribavirin with full-dose therapy for 24 weeks (non-genotype 1) or 48 weeks (genotype 1) with baseline liver biopsy and at least 6 months of follow-up after treatment. HCV RNA by PCR and hepatic blood tests were obtained monthly during treatment and at least 1, 3, and 6 months post treatment.

Results

Of the initially treated patients, 54.2% had SVR, 25% non-response and 20.8% relapsed. Four of 25 who relapsed (16%) and one similar patient referred to our program had HCV RNA <5,000 IU/ml 6 months after stopping treatment (VLVL relapse). Significant differences (P < 0.05) compared with the 21 other relapse patients included all five patients who were genotype 1; 4/5 had cirrhosis, baseline HCV RNA was lower, and all had SVR to less intensive re-treatment for 6 months.

Conclusion

VLVL relapse patients should be sought, because SVR to re-treatment is common despite genotype 1 cirrhosis.