A comparative study of oral tegafur and intravenous 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

A randomized study was conducted in patients who had measurable metastatic colorectal cancer to compare the relative efficacy and toxicities of oral tegafur (1 gm/m2/days 1-21) with those of 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu, 500 mg/m2/days 1-4, then 250 mg/m2 on days 6, 8, 10, 12). The treatment courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients not responding to 5-Fu treatment were switched to tegafur. Randomization was stratified for presence or absence of liver metastasis and performance status. Partial responses were observed with 5-Fu, 6/32 (19%), tegafur, 7/35 (20%), and in patients who had been switched to tegafur after failing on 5-Fu, 1/20 (5%) with patients evaluable for response. Neutropenia was more common with 5-Fu (32% vs. 1% of treatment courses). Nausea occurred in about half the treatment courses; vomiting occurred in only 22%. Mucositis and diarrhea were more common with 5-Fu and severe in patients with liver function impairment. Neurologic toxicities due to tegafur were mild and occurred in less than 10% of the treatment courses. Oral tegafur and I.V. 5-Fu were equally effective against colorectal cancer, but tegafur was associated with minimal myelosuppression, which makes it suitable for use in combination with myelosuppressive antitumor agents.     

Biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil: A randomized comparison of sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin versus sequential 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced symptomatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: The optimal chemotherapy for advanced colorectal carcinoma isnot known. Two regimens, both based upon biochemical modulationof 5-FU, were compared in a randomized multicenter trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 202 symptomatic patients were randomly allocatedto receive either sequential methotrexate, 250 mg/m², duringthe first 2 hours and 5-FU, 500 mg/m², at hours 3 and 23 followedby leucovorin rescue initiated at hour 24 (15 mg x 8) (MFL)or sequential 5-FU 500 mg/m² followed by leucovorin 60 mg/m²30–40 minutes later, on days 1 and 2 (FLv). Treatmentswere repeated every 14 days for eight courses and then every3 to 4 weeks. Four patients were unevaluable. RESULTS: The two treatments were equally effective with respect to objectiveresponse rates (complete (CR) + partial (PR), MFL 17%, FLv 21%),subjective response rates (symptom relief in the absence ofsevere adverse effects, 45% vs. 37%), and survival (median 7.5vs. 9 months). All responses lasted at least 4 months. Overall,toxicity was low and comparable between the groups, but serioustoxicity was more common in the MFL group. CONCLUSIONS: Since FLv is easier to administer and carries less risk forserious toxicity, it should be recommended as a first-line treatmentbefore MFL. On either regimen, about 40% of symptomatic patientscan expect palliation, i.e., symptomatic relief without severeadverse effects, for at least 4 months. biochemical modulation, chemotherapy, colorectal cancer, 5-fluorouracil, subjective response     

Phase II study of oral eniluracil, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

BACKGROUND: The oral administration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is hindered by erratic bioavailability due to catabolism of 5-FU by the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in the gastrointestinal tract. Eniluracil is a potent inactivator of DPD which results in 100% oral bioavailability of 5-FU. Leucovorin (LV) is another biochemical modulator of 5-FU that potentiates inhibition of thymidylate synthase, the primary target of 5-FU. The goal of this study was to determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of an oral regimen containing eniluracil, 5-FU, and LV in patients with colorectal carcinoma. METHODS: Sixty eligible patients who had previously untreated, measurable, metastatic colorectal carcinoma were treated with oral eniluracil 50 mg on Days 1-7, 5-FU 20 mg/m(2) on Days 2-6, and LV 50 mg on Days 2-6. Cycles were repeated at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 13% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 6, 25%), with 1 complete response and 7 partial responses. Three additional patients had partial responses that were not confirmed at subsequent evaluations. The median time to progression of disease was 4.4 months (95% CI = 3.45, 7.69) and the median survival time was 12.6 months (95% CI = 9.1, 14.75). Grade 3-5 toxicity (1 toxic death) occurred in 51 patients (85%). Grade 4 neutropenia occurred in 25 patients (42%), and 18 patients (30%) had Grade 3-4 diarrhea. Twenty-one patients (35%) were hospitalized for toxicity, and 12 (20%) had febrile neutropenia. Baseline creatinine clearance was associated inversely with severe toxicity (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Although antitumor activity was observed, the frequent occurrence of severe toxicity with this regimen limited its clinical utility. Alternate schedules with a more favorable therapeutic index are undergoing clinical testing and should be pursued. The high level of toxicity observed with orally administered low dose 5-FU underscored the potency of eniluracil as a biochemical modulator.     

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: randomized trial comparing oral uracil and tegafur and oral leucovorin vs. intravenous 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin

PURPOSE: To compare, in a randomized trial, 5-fluorouracil (FU) plus leucovorin (LV) (FU+LV) vs. oral uracil and tegafur (UFT) plus LV (UFT+LV) given concomitantly with preoperative irradiation in patients with cT3-4 or N+ rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 155 patients were entered onto the trial. Patients received pelvic radiotherapy (4500-5,040 cGy in 5 to 6 weeks) and chemotherapy consisting of two 5-day courses of 20 mg/m(2)/d LV and 350 mg/m(2)/d FU in the first and fifth weeks of radiotherapy (77 patients) or one course of 25 mg/d oral LV and 300 mg/m(2)/d UFT for 4 weeks beginning in the second week of radiotherapy (78 patients). The primary endpoints were pathologic complete response (pCR) and resectability rate. Secondary endpoints included downstaging rate, toxicity, and survival. RESULTS: Grade 3-5 acute hematologic toxicity occurred only with FU+LV (leukopenia 9%; p = 0.02). There were no differences in resectability rates (92.1% vs. 93.4%; p = 0.82). The pCR rate was 13.2% in both arms. Tumor downstaging was more frequent with UFT+LV (59.2% vs. 43.3%; p = 0.04). Three-year overall survival was 87% with FU+LV and 74% with UFT+LV (p = 0.37). The 3-year cumulative incidences of local recurrence were 7.5% and 8.9%, respectively (p = 0.619; relative risk, 1.46; 95% confidence interval 0.32-6.55). CONCLUSION: Although this study lacked statistical power to exclude clinically significant differences between both groups, the outcome of patients treated with UFT+LV did not differ significantly from that of patients treated with FU+LV, and hematologic toxicity was significantly lower in the experimental arm.     

国产奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和5-氟脲嘧啶治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察

目的：评价奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙、5—氟脲嘧啶(OXA—CF—5—Fu)方案治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性。方法：奥沙利铂(OXA)130mg／m^2，静脉滴注4h，d1；亚叶酸钙(CF)200mg静脉滴注2小时，5—氟脲嘧啶(5—Fu)0．25g于CF滴完后静脉推注，5-Fu0．5g持续静脉滴注6-8小时，d1-5，每3周重复。结果：全组26例患者，有效率(CR PR)为42．31％，不良反应为恶心、呕吐和骨髓抑制，但多为Ⅰ～Ⅱ度，一过性感觉异常。结论：奥沙利铂联合亚叶酸钙和5—氟脲嘧啶治疗晚期结直肠癌疗效较高，不良反应轻而且安全。     

草酸铂联合氟尿嘧啶、醛氢叶酸治疗晚期结直肠癌的临床观察

Objective:To observe the efficacy and tolerability of continuously infusing 5-fluorouracii(5-FU)/folic acid combined with oxaliplatin(L-OHP/5-FU/Lv regimen)as first line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer.Methods:23 patients of advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-Fu 500mg/d,civ,d1-d5,d8-d12,leucovorin 100mg/d,iv gtt,d1,d8,folic acid tablet 60 mg/d,po,d2-d5,d9-d12,and oxaliplatin 65mg/(m2-d),iv gtt,d1,d8,repeated every 21 days(one cycle).The effect was evaluated after two cycles.Results:Complete response in 2 cases and partial response in 10 cases were observed with an overall response rate of 47.18%.Adverse effects were mainly grade 1-2,including nausea,vomiting,diarrhea,dental ulcer,peripheral neuritis and myelosuppression.Conclusion:L-OHP/5-FU/LV regimen is an effective and better tolerated alterna tive treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and yields promising clinical application.     

A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Seventy-four previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma were prospectively randomized into one of three treatment regimens: (1) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 450 mg/m2 as an intravenous (IV) bolus daily for five days or toxicity, then 200 mg/m2 IV bolus every other day for six doses; (2) methotrexate (MTX) 50 mg/m2 in normal saline by IV infusion over four hours followed by an IV bolus of 5-FU 600 mg/m2. This was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then every 2 weeks. (3) Leucovorin 500 mg/m2 in a two-hour IV infusion of normal saline with 5-FU 600 mg/m2 as an IV bolus one hour after the Leucovorin began every week for 6 weeks. The combined complete and partial response rates in the three regimens were 11%, 5%, and 48%, respectively (P = .0009). The median duration of response in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was 10 months. There was no statistically significant difference between the treatment regimens with respect to survival time (P = .6). Toxicity in the 5-FU and Leucovorin regimen was predominantly diarrhea (13 of 30 patients, 40%). In this regimen, eight of 13 patients (52%) who developed diarrhea not only required a dose reduction of 5-FU, but also hospitalization for IV hydration. The predominant toxicity in the 5-FU alone regimen and the 5-FU and MTX regimen was leukopenia. One drug-related death occurred in each regimen.     

Treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin

Based on in vitro studies that have demonstrated synergy between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV), and cisplatin (CDDP) against human colon cancer cell lines, a clinical trial was initiated to determine the effects of this combination in patients with advanced unresectable colorectal carcinoma. Fifty-nine patients were enrolled in the study and 12 of them had received prior conventional 5-FU chemotherapy. Treatment consisted of 4 weekly courses of high-dose LV (200 mg/m2) administered by intravenous (IV) bolus, followed by 5-FU (550 mg/m2) and CDDP (20 mg/m2) each administered as a 2-hour infusion on 4 consecutive days. After a median of 5.5 treatment cycles, objective tumor response was seen in 20 of 59 patients (34%) (this included 3 complete remissions). The response rate in the 47 previously untreated patients was 38% (95% confidence limits, 26% to 53%). Stable disease occurred in 16 (27%) patients, whereas the tumor progressed in 23 (39%) patients. The median survival time was 11.5 months, with 15% of the patients alive at 2 years. The regimen was well tolerated and the primary side effects were mild and reversible gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. There was no episode of life-threatening toxicity. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Grade III adverse reactions that required 25% dose reductions occurred in only 14% of the patients. The results of this trial suggest that 5-FU, LV, and CDDP is an active, safe, and well-tolerated combination regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.     

Oxaliplatin combined with 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin regimen for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

Objective： To observe the efficacy and tolerability of continuously infusing 5-fluorouracil （5-FU） / folic acid combined with oxaliplatin （L-OHP/5-FU/LV regimen） as first line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. Methods： 23 patients of advanced colorectal cancer were treated with 5-FU 500 mg/d, civ, d 1-d5, d8-d12, leucovorin 100 mg/d, iv gtt, d1, d8, folic acid tablet 60 mg/d, po, d2-d5, d9-d12, and oxaliplatin 65 mg/（m^2·d）, iv gtt, dl, d8, repeated every 21 days （one cycle）. The effect was evaluated after two cycles. Results： Complete response in 2 cases and partial response in 10 cases were observed with an overall response rate of 47.18%. Adverse effects were mainly grade 1-2, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dental ulcer, peripheral neuritis and myelosuppression. Conclusion： L-OHP/5-FU/LV regimen is an effective and better tolerated alternative treatment in advanced colorectal cancer and yields promising clinical application.     

Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study was designed to demonstrate equivalence in survival of oral uracil/tegafur (UFT) and oral leucovorin (LV) to conventional intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Safety was also compared. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred sixteen patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (75 or 90 mg/d) for 28 days every 35 days or IV bolus 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 days every 28 days. RESULTS: UFT/LV produced survival comparable to the IV 5-FU/LV regimen. Median survival was 12.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.2 to 13.6 months) with UFT/LV and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.6 to 15.4 months) with 5-FU/LV (P =.630). The hazard ratio for survival was 0.964 (95.6% CI, 0.826 to 1.125), supporting equivalent survival. The overall response rate did not differ between treatment arms (UFT/LV, 11.7%; 5-FU/LV, 14.5%; P =.232). Median time to progression favored 5-FU/LV (UFT/LV, 3.5 months; 5-FU/LV, 3.8 months; P =.011), but tumor assessment schedules differed between arms. UFT/LV significantly improved safety compared with 5-FU/LV. Diarrhea, nausea and vomiting, and stomatitis and mucositis were significantly less frequent with UFT/LV, as was myelosuppression. Patients treated with UFT/LV had fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and documented infections (P <.05). Increased bilirubin, without other liver function abnormalities, was observed more often with UFT/LV (P <.001). Concomitant medications were more frequent with 5-FU/LV, including use of antibiotics, growth factors, and antiemetics. CONCLUSION: UFT/LV provided a safer, more convenient oral alternative to a standard bolus IV 5-FU/LV regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer while producing equivalent survival.     

Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase III study compared the time to progression (TTP) of an oral regimen of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine composed of a fixed combination of tegafur and uracil in a 1:4 molar ratio (UFT) and leucovorin (LV) to intravenous (IV) fluorouracil (5-FU) and LV in previously untreated metastatic colorectal carcinoma (CRC) patients. Secondary end points were survival, tumor response, safety, and quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 1996 and July 1997, 380 patients were randomized to receive either UFT (300 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (90 mg/d), administered for 28 days every 35 days, or 5-FU (425 mg/m(2)/d) and LV (20 mg/m(2)/d), given IV for 5 days every 35 days. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in TTP was observed between treatments. With 320 events assessed, the median TTP was 3.4 months (95% Confidence interval [CI], 2.6 to 3.8) on UFT/LV and 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.5 to 3.7) on 5-FU/LV (P =.591, stratified log-rank test). There were no statistically significant differences in survival, tumor response, duration of response, and time to response. Substantial safety benefits were observed in patients treated with UFT/LV. They experienced significantly less stomatitis/mucositis (P <.001) and myelosuppression, resulting in fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia (P <.001) and less documented infection (P =.04). Concomitant medication usage was significantly greater on 5-FU/LV (P =.010). With respect to quality of life, after correcting for baseline imbalances, there were no significant differences between treatments for any scale, except diarrhea. CONCLUSION: The oral UFT/LV regimen failed to achieve improved TTP; however, the study confirms significant safety improvements compared with bolus IV 5-FU/LV for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC.     

Lack of effectiveness of combined 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with 5-fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer

Favorable results have been reported for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with the combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV). In these investigations the highest response rates were obtained in non-pretreated patients. In the present study, 22 patients with primary or acquired resistance to single-agent 5-FU and documented progressive disease on 5-FU were given a bolus injection of LV at a dose of 200 mg/m², 1 h prior to a 2 h infusion of 5-FU at a dose of 370–770 mg/m² on 5 consecutive days, and this was repeated every 3 weeks. Whenever possible the dose of 5-FU was escalated to find the maximum tolerable dose. No objective response was observed. Five patients had short-lasting stable disease. Despite 5-FU dose escalation, toxicity was acceptable. One patient developed 5-FU-related angina pectoris with EKG changes. It is concluded that in the schedule used, combined LV/5-FU treatment is ineffective for patients with 5-FU-resistant advanced colorectal cancer.     

羟基喜树碱联合5-FU/CF治疗晚期大肠癌临床观察

目的　观察应用羟基喜树碱联合治疗晚期大肠癌的近期疗效及毒副反应。方法　 72例晚期大肠癌随机分为两组 ,一组为治疗组 :10 羟基喜树碱 (Hydroxycamptothecin ,HCPT)联合 5 FU/CF ;另一组为对照组 :5 FU/CF。 结果　治疗组有效率5 2 .8% ,对照组有效率 30 .6 % ,差异有显著性 (P <0 .0 5 )。毒副反应主要是恶心、呕吐及白细胞减少 ,但大多限于Ⅰ～Ⅱ度 ,两组无显著性差异 (P >0 .0 5 )。结论　HCPT联合 5 FU/CF治疗晚期大肠癌有效而安全     

A phase III study of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil plus interferon alpha 2b versus 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) study

We conducted a phase III study in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (ACC). The total number of patients randomized from October 1993 until July 1998 was 192, whereas therapy was started on 179 and 158 (82.3%) have been evaluable. The treatment schedules consisted of weekly bolus administration for 6 weeks of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 600 mg/m2 (arm I) versus 5-FU (500 mg/m2) intravenous bolus and interferon-alpha, 5 MU subcutaneously, three times a week (arm II) versus leucovorin 200 mg/m2 in 2-hour infusion and 5-FU 500 mg/m2 intravenous bolus at the midtime of leucovorin infusion (arm III) followed by a 2-week rest period. Treatment was continued for six cycles or until progression. This study failed to show any superiority of the modulated 5-FU versus single administration of 5-FU. There were no significant differences between the three arms in the overall response rate (10.3% versus 11.3% versus 12.9%, p = 0.95), the time to tumor progression (median, 3.9 versus 3.8 versus 6.0 months, p = 0.59), or survival duration (median, 14.7 versus 12.4 versus 16.3 months, p = 0.71). The incidence of severe (grades III and IV) toxicity was significantly higher in patients in arm II and III (24.5% and 18.6%) versus arm I (6.0%) (p = 0.01). Because modulated 5-FU failed to show superiority versus 5-FU, new agents and new strategies are needed for the treatment of advanced colorectal carcinoma.     

Phase II study of irinotecan, leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and tegafur/uracil for metastatic colorectal cancer

Irinotecan combined with continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil (5FU) has been shown to be an effective and tolerable regimen in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). Tegafur/uracil (UFT) during 5FU infusion enhances plasma 5FU concentration, mimics continuous 5FU infusion and delivers the drug to target tumor cells. We conducted a phase II trial of four-agent combined therapy for MCRC, giving patients (pts) intravenous irinotecan (30 mg/m2 on day 1), leucovorin (LV, 200 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2), 5FU (300 mg/m2 on day 1 and 2), and UFT (400 mg/day for 14 days). The main endpoint was the objective tumor response rate. Sixteen pts with a good performance status were enrolled from February 2001 to May 2002. The response rate was 19% (3 partial responses), and 13 pts had stable disease. The median time to progression was 5.2 months, and the median survival time was 20.2 months. Considering the low toxicity and reasonable cost, this regimen deserves further investigation.     

Efficacy of oral tegafur modulation by uracil and leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. A phase II study

A phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and toxicity of UFT (tegafur-uracil in the molar ratio 1: 4) modulated with leucovorin (LV) in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma (CRC). 79 patients with measurable advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) and no prior chemotherapy were included. 75 patients were evaluable for toxicity and response. The regimen consisted of LV 500 mg/m² administered intravenously on day 1, followed by oral UFT 390 mg/m² on days 1–14. Patients received oral LV 15 mg every 12 h on days 2–14. Treatment was repeated every 28 days for a minimum of four courses per patient. Three hundred and ninety-eight cycles of chemotherapy were delivered (median five per patient). 7 patients (9%) had a complete response, and 22 a partial response for an overall response rate of 39%. Mild gastrointestinal toxicity was dose limiting: grade 3–4 diarrhoea appeared in 9% of patients. Other grade 3–4 toxicities were nausea/vomiting and mucositis in 4% of patients, gastric pain and leucopenia in 3%. Oral UFT modulated by oral LV is active in advanced CRC and can be administered on an outpatient basis with no significant toxicity requiring hospitalisation. Given its excellent tolerance profile and low toxicity, the regimen should be thoroughly studied and compared with 5-fluorouracil modulated by LV.     

A Northern California Oncology Group randomized trial of leucovorin plus 5-fluorouracil versus sequential methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer who failed treatment with 5-fluorouracil or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine alone

The current study was initiated to confirm preliminary reports that 20% or more of patients with colorectal cancer who fail treatment with 5-fluorouracil (FUra) will respond to treatment with either leucovorin plus FUra or with sequential methotrexate, FUra, leucovorin. One hundred two patients with advanced, measureable colorectal cancer who failed treatment with FUra and/or 5-fluorodeoxyuridine (FUdR) were randomized to treatment with either high-dose leucovorin plus FUra (Arm B) or sequential methotrexate, FUra, leucovorin (Arm C). In this interim report, 92 patients were evaluable for toxicity and 89 patients were evaluable for response. Grade 3 or 4 nonhematologic toxicity which was primarily gastrointestinal was experienced by 25% of patients on both treatment arms during at least 1 treatment cycle. Hematologic toxicity was minimal. Among 43 evaluable patients on Arm B, there were 2 complete responses (5%) and 1 minor response (3%). Among 46 evaluable patients on Arm C, there was 1 complete response (2%), 1 partial response (2%), and 6 minor responses (14%). The median time to treatment failure was 2.2 months on Arm B and 3.5 months on Arm C. The median survival was 8.3 months on Arm B and 8.7 months on Arm C. Colorectal cancers that are resistant to FUra are cross-resistant to both experimental combinations.