A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of controlled trials comparing the merits of different heart valve prostheses. In this prospective randomized trial we compared Starr Edwards and St. Jude prostheses in the aortic and mitral positions. METHODS: Two hundred sixty-seven patients and 122 patients undergoing aortic and mitral valve replacement, respectively, were allocated by minimization to receive either St. Jude or Starr Edwards prostheses. Patients (2 patients were lost to follow-up) were followed up in a special clinic. Event definition, recording, and reporting were in accordance with published guidelines. RESULTS: There were no demographic differences between patients receiving the two different valve models. With the exception of infective endocarditis, we found no differences in the rates of death or complication between patients receiving a Starr Edwards prosthesis or a St. Jude prosthesis in either position. Neither were there any differences between the two valve models in either position, in terms of symptomatic relief 5 years after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: We found no differences in rates of complication or of symptomatic improvement between the Starr Edwards and St. Jude valve prostheses in either aortic or mitral position. Left ventricular function had such a marked effect on long-term survival that it overwhelmed any differences that might exist between different prosthetic designs. This confirms that historical comparisons are of limited value in deciding the respective merits of heart valve prostheses. The most reliable method of assessing surgical procedures is through prospective controlled trials.     

Simultaneous implantation of St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses

Since January 1980, 92 consecutive patients received St. Jude Medical aortic and mitral prostheses simultaneously. Mean age was 57.6 years (standard deviation 12.4); 14 were 70 years or older. Twenty-three had a previous cardiac operation and 22 had additional procedures performed at the time of double valve replacement. Before the operation 62% of the patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III and 29% were in class IV or required emergency operation. There were six (6.5%) deaths within 30 days. None of the hospital deaths were valve related; all occurred in patients who had additional risk concerns. Follow-up is 100% complete and ranges from 2 to 80 months, totaling 242 patient-years (mean 33.8 months). All except four hospital survivors reached class I or II and 40 patients (47%) remain asymptomatic. The actuarial survival rates are 82% at 1 year, 70% at 3 years, and 60% at 5 years. Causes of late death include heart failure (10), sudden, unexplained death (five), reoperation for coronary artery disease (one), noncardiac (four), and valve related (five). The linearized rate of fatal valve-related events is 2.1% pt-yr. A total of 22 valve-related complications (including five fatal) occurred is 18 patients, for a linearized rate or incidence of 9.1%/pt-yr. Eleven thromboembolic episodes (rate 4.6%/pt-yr) occurred in nine patients; three of these (1.2%/pt-yr) were fatal. Thromboembolic and bleeding complications represented 64% of all valve-related complications. Four patients had six episodes of prosthetic valve endocarditis (incidence 2.5%/pt-yr), of which one (incidence 0.4%/pt-yr) was fatal. Paravalvular leak contributed to the fifth valve-related death. At 5 years, 83% of patients were free of thromboembolic complications; 94% were free of anticoagulant-related hemorrhage; and 71% were free of all valve-related complications. There are few comparable data for patients who have had simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves with other mechanical prostheses. The total incidence of valve-related complications for patients with bioprostheses ranges between 3.9%/pt-yr and 10.4%/pt-yr and is similar to the 9.1%/pt-yr observed in the present series. The type of valve-related complication (thromboemboli and bleeding versus valve deterioration) is the principal difference between St. Jude Medical and bioprosthetic valves in patients who require simultaneous replacement of aortic and mitral valves.     

St. Jude prosthetic valve obstruction in the mitral position

We report a surgical case of prosthetic valve obstruction after mitral valve replacement by a St. Jude Medical valve. A 66-year-old woman was admitted because of congestive heart failure. Prosthetic valve obstruction was diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography and cine-fluoroscopy. Re-do cardiac surgery was indicated after a week of heparinization. Circumferential pannus formation into the orifice beyond the pivot guard of the prosthesis on the atrial side and one piece of the leaflet was covered with a fibrous overgrowth on the atrial side. We concluded that once the diagnosis of valve thrombosis is established, urgent operation is preferred in patients with hemodynamic instability before the development of cardiogenic shock or multiple organ failure.     

Hemodynamic and hemolytic features of the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses

We performed valvular replacement in 86 cases (108 valves, 43 males, 43 females) from July 1978 to July 1981 with St. Jude Medical valves which utilize two discs made of pyrolytic carbon and employ a bileaflet central opening system. Ages ranged from 13 to 68 years (average 42.3). For all cases in this study, we performed anti-coagulant therapy. The incidence of thromboembolic complication was zero. With regard to postoperative clinical evaluation on valve function and chronic hemolysis, we compared the cases of St. Jude Medical valves with those of Starr-Edwards (S.E.) valves (aortic: Model 2320, mitral: Model 6400), Carpentier-Edwards (C.E.) valves and cases of open mitral commissurotomy. As for valve function such as left atrioventricular diastolic pressure gradient, mitral effective orifice area both at rest and on exercise, the St. Jude Medical valve yielded best results. Next was the C.E. and third was the S.E. The results of the St. Jude Medical valve group and those of the open mitral commissurotomy group were equivalent. In comparison with ball type cardiac valve prostheses and bioprostheses, the St. Jude Medical valve has excellent hemodynamic characteristic. Concerning hemolysis, the St. Jude Medical was below only the C.E., however the degree of hemolysis was so low that the St. Jude Medical valve holds great promise as central flow mechanical valve prostheses.     

Spontaneous embolization of a St. Jude prosthetic mitral valve leaflet

A patient with left ventricular failure as a result of leaflet embolization from a St. Jude valve implanted 20 months earlier is described.     

Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the St. Jude Medical prosthesis

From April 1, 1979 to August 31, 1983, 228 patients underwent isolated aortic (AVR) (118) or mitral (MVR) (90) valve replacements with a new tilting disc valve prosthesis, the St. Jude prosthesis, at the Medical University of South Carolina. Age ranged from 6 to 84 years (mean 49.1 +/- 19.2 AVR, 44.5 +/- 16.5 MVR). Male sex predominated in the AVR group (68%) and female sex in the MVR group (68%). Thirty-five patients (16.8%) had associated coronary bypass surgery (AVR 23.7%, MVR 7.8%). There were seven deaths (3.4%) occurring during the same hospitalization (AVR: 3/118, 2.5%; MVR: 4/90, 4.4%). Follow-up is 97.6% complete and ranges from 1 to 54 months (mean 19.6 +/- 12.4). In the AVR group, nine late deaths have occurred and actuarial survival at 42 months is 86.7 +/- 3.8%. Three patients have sustained thromboembolic episodes for a linearized rate of 1.6% patient-year, and the probability of remaining free of thromboembolism at 42 months is 96.9 +/- 1.8%. The mean improvement in functional class from preoperative to postoperative is 3.1 +/- 0.7 to 1.2 +/- 0.4 (p less than 0.001). In the MVR group, there have been four late deaths, and the actuarial survival at 42 months is 89.3 +/- 3.8%. Two patients have sustained thromboembolic complications for a linearized rate of 1.2%/patient-year, and the probability of remaining free of thromboembolism at 42 months is 97.2 +/- 2%. The mean improvement in functional class from before to after surgery is 3.2 +/- 0.7 to 1.3 +/- 0.5 (p less than 0.001). There have been no thromboses of the St. Jude valve in the mitral or aortic position, no mechanical failures, and no patient has had significant valve-related hemolysis. Because of this experience, the St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis is our prosthesis of choice for any patient undergoing valve replacement with a mechanical prosthesis.     

Mitral valve replacement: randomized trial of St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses.

To better define the merits of the bileaflet and tilting-disc valves, we prospectively randomized 102 patients (mean age, 57 years; range, 11 to 85 years) to receive either the St. Jude (n = 55) or the Medtronic-Hall (n = 47) mitral valve prosthesis between September 1986 and May 1991. The two groups were not different with respect to preoperative New York Heart Association class, incidence of mitral stenosis and insufficiency, angina score, extent of coronary artery disease, ventricular function, completeness of revascularization, or cross-clamp or bypass time. The hospital mortality (14.5% versus 10.6%, St. Jude versus Medtronic-Hall) and late mortality (7.3% versus 2.1%) were not significantly different. Follow-up was complete in 84 of 89 hospital survivors (94%) with a mean of 26 months (range, 1 to 60 months). The linearized rates of valve-related events and the 3-year actuarial survival demonstrated no significant differences between both cohorts. Comparison of the clinical outcome and echocardiographic parameters obtained at the time of follow-up demonstrated no significant differences between the two prostheses. These data indicate that the Medtronic-Hall and St. Jude mitral prostheses are similar with respect to their rates of valve-related complications and hemodynamic profiles. This study suggests that there is no difference between the St. Jude and Medtronic-Hall prostheses with regard to early clinical performance or hemodynamic results and therefore does not support the preferential selection of either prosthesis.     

Comparative analysis of Hancock and St. Jude Medical valve after mitral valve replacement]

Long term results were compared in 81 operative survivors with MVR using Hancock valve (Hancock group) and 83 using St. Jude Medical valve (SJM group). The cumulative follow-up was 709.0 patients-year (p-y) and 175.2 p-y in the Hancock and SJM groups. Twenty-four percent of the patients in the Hancock group was permanently anticoagulated, while 100% of patients in the SJM group anticoagulated. The 7-year actuarial survival rate including early mortality was 79.3 +/- 4.6% for the Hancock and 93.9 +/- 3.0% for the SJM group (p less than 0.01). The survival rate was significantly higher in the SJM group than that in the Hancock group. The 7-year actuarial event free rate of the valve-related complications in the Hancock and SJM groups were as follows; thromboembolism 88.6 +/- 3.8% vs 95.0 +/- 2.8% (NS), hemorrhage, 94.0 +/- 3.0% vs 98.7 +/- 1.8% (NS), paravalvular leak 92.6 +/- 3.2% vs 97.4 +/- 1.8% (NS), infection 93.9 +/- 3.0% vs 100% (p less than 0.05), valve malfunction 78.0 +/- 5.2% vs 100% (p less than 0.001), overall valve related complications 58.9 +/- 5.9% vs 91.1 +/- 3.5% (p less than 0.001), reoperation for valve-related complication 83.1 +/- 4.6% vs 100% (p less than 0.01). The event free rate of reoperation for valve related complication in the Hancock group was significantly lower than that in the SJM group. The Hancock valve had the acceptable antithrombogenicity, but had the limited long-term durability.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Prospective randomized comparison of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical bileaflet mechanical heart valve prostheses: an interim report.

OBJECTIVE: This is a midterm report of a study comparing the clinical performance of CarboMedics and St Jude Medical heart valve prostheses through a projected 10-year period. METHODS: Between 1992 and 1996, a total of 485 patients undergoing mechanical valve replacement were prospectively randomly assigned to receive either CarboMedics (n = 234) or St Jude Medical (n = 251) prostheses for aortic (n = 288), mitral (n = 160), or double (n = 37) valve replacements and were followed up annually. RESULTS: Baseline and operative characteristics were similar between the two groups with respect to major demographic characteristics, preoperative clinical status, and operative data. Mean follow-up was 50 +/- 22 months for the CarboMedics group (97% complete) and 47 +/- 20 months for the St Jude Medical group (96% complete), yielding a total of 1959 patient-years. The 30-day mortality, and 5-year actuarial survival, and linearized survival were 6.0%, 82.4% +/- 2.6%, and 4.3% per patient-year in the CarboMedics group and 4.4%, 79.9% +/- 2.8%, and 4.7% per patient-year in the St Jude Medical group (log-rank P =.7). Freedom at 5 years from valve-related mortality, major thromboembolism, hemorrhage, and other nonstructural valve dysfunction was, respectively, 96.7% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year), 90.9% +/- 2.1% (2.2% per patient-year), 87.3% +/- 2.5% (3.6% per patient-year), and 96.1% +/- 1.4% (0.7% per patient-year) in the CarboMedics group and 95.9% +/- 1.5% (1.0% per patient-year), 92.5% +/- 1.8% (2.0% per patient-year), 82.6% +/- 2.8% (4.3% per patient-year), and 96.0% +/- 1.3% (0.6% per patient-year) in the St Jude Medical group, with no overall intergroup differences. No statistically significant intergroup differences in international normalized ratio values were detected during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows no significant differences in the early and midterm clinical outcomes between patients who received CarboMedics valve prostheses and those who received St Jude Medical mechanical prostheses. Choices with respect to valve type can be based on considerations other than patient outcome.     

Ten years experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis for mitral valve replacement

During the 10-year period between 1980 and December 1989, isolated mitral valve replacement (MVR) with the St. Jude Medical (SJM) valve prosthesis was performed on 404 patients at our hospital, and a long-term postoperative follow-up was conducted. There were 161 males and 243 females ranged in age from 1 year to 73 years. Early operative mortality was 5.2%. Follow-up period for 383 patients who discharged from the hospital was 1970.7 patient-years. Twenty of these patients died during the follow-up period, and a late mortality rate was 5.2%. During 10 years, thromboembolic event occurred in 8 patients. Four patients had anticoagulant-related bleeding, 4 had paravalvular leak, and 5 underwent re-operations. There was neither structural valve failure nor prosthetic valve endocarditis. Therefore, the actuarial survival rate and the valve-related death-free rate at 10 years were 83.2%, and 96.8%. Of the patients who survived, New York Heart Association class improved significantly (93% in classes II and III preoperatively and 71% in class I postoperatively). Linearized rates for thromboembolism, anticoagulant-related bleeding, and hemolysis were 0.41%, 0.20% and 0.36%/100 patient-years, respectively. The actuarial estimate of incidence free from all complications was 92.0% at 10 years. On the basis of this 10 years' experience, we believe that the SJM valve prosthesis is an excellent mechanical prosthesis for mitral valve replacement, in terms of hemodynamic performance and low thrombogenicity in patients receiving anticoagulants.     

Long-term results of aortic valve replacement with the St. Jude Toronto stentless porcine valve

Background

Long-term survival and freedom from valve-related events of the St. Jude Toronto stentless porcine valve (SPV) are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate late clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV.

Methods

Between 1992 and 2000, 200 patients (131 males, 69 females) underwent aortic valve replacement with the Toronto SPV. Mean patient age at implantation was 64.6 ± 10.9 years (range 33 to 82 years). At the time of operation, 32%, 51%, and 17% of patients were in New York Heart Association class I/II, III, and IV, respectively. Aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, and combined lesions were present in 64%, 13.5%, and 22.5% of patients preoperatively. Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 34.5% of patients.

Results

Perioperative mortality occurred in 2.5% (5/200) of patients. There were 31 late deaths. Actuarial survival at 5 and 10 years was 89.2% and 68.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in overall actuarial survival between isolated valve patients and valve plus coronary artery bypass grafting patients, 71% versus 62% respectively, p = 0.85. Actuarial freedom from valve reoperation at 5 and 10 years was 97.6% and 79.9%, respectively. Actuarial freedom from structural valve deterioration was 98.8% at 5 years and declined to 77.9% at 10 years. Freedom from structural valve deterioration was poorer in patients with preoperative aortic insufficiency or bicuspid disease. Actuarial freedom from embolic events and endocarditis at 10 years were 94.6% and 95.9%, respectively.

Conclusions

Although early clinical results were excellent, a significant increase in hazard for structural valve deterioration occurred in late follow-up.     

Comparison of noninvasive techniques in evaluation of the Bj?rk-Shiley and the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses in mitral position

Pressure gradients and left ventricular function were assessed by Doppler echocardiography in 50 patients with Bj?rk-Shiley mitral valve and 50 patients with St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. There was correlation between pressure gradient and valve size, and between effective valve orifice area and valve size for St. Jude Medical valve. These correlations were not found in Bj?rk-Shiley valve. Clinical improvement and cardiac function were quite satisfactory in 20 patients with Bj?rk-Shiley valve and in 32 patients with St. Jude Medical valve whose pressure gradients were less than 10 mmHg. Twenty eight of 50 patients with Bj?rk-Shiley valve and 42 of 50 patients with St. Jude Medical valve showed good response to the exercise test. Eight patients underwent reoperation because of unacceptably high gradient caused by thrombus and pannus formation. The patients who show high pressure gradient across the valve prosthesis should be followed up cautiously.     

The choice of anticoagulation in pediatric patients with the St. Jude Medical valve prostheses

Between February 1982 and January 1984 27 St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prostheses were implanted in 24 children ranging in age from 5 to 20 years (mean 12.38 years). There were 10 isolated aortic valve replacements, 14 isolated mitral valve replacements and one triple valve replacement (aortic, mitral and tricuspid). There was one operative and four late deaths. All patients were maintained on Aspirin and Dipyridamole from the early postoperative period. There were six documented thromboembolic events occurring in five patients. There were 0.68 thromboembolic events per patient year in the aortic valve group and 0.19 events in the mitral valve group. Because of the significant incidence of thromboembolic events in our patients, we now recommend universal anticoagulation with Coumadin in all pediatric age patients in whom the St. Jude Medical prosthesis is implanted.