Impact of Radiation Therapy After High Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Lymphomas: A Single Center Experience

IntroductionAfter high dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (auto-SCT), in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), involved field radiation therapy (RT) for consolidation and residual/progressive disease (PD) eradication is a common practice.Materials and methodsRetrospective single-institution cohort analysis to evaluate the impact of early RT after HDC auto-SCT.ResultsBetween 1996 and October 2019, 153 patients (43 DLBCL, 110 HL) underwent RT after HDC auto-SCT. Males 95 (62%), females 58 (38%), median age 24 years. Indications for RT was consolidation 65%: residual disease eradication 16%: and PD eradication 19%. For DLBCL, the median overall survival (OS) for the above indications was not reached (NR):NR:2 months and the KM 5-year OS was 72.6%:64.3%:12.5% respectively (P ≤ .000). Pair-wise analysis showed that consolidation versus residual disease eradication had no difference (P = .88) but both were superior to PD disease eradication (P ≤ 000 and P = .005 respectively). For HL, indication for RT was, 54%:23%:24% respectively. The median OS was NR:NR:28.8 months and KM 5-year OS was 82.3%:78%:30% respectively (P ≤ .000). Pair-wise analysis showed that consolidation versus residual disease eradication had no difference (P = .98) but both were superior to the PD eradication group (P ≤ 000). RT was well tolerated with no significant long-term toxicity.ConclusionPost HDC auto-SCT RT was well tolerated. DLBCL and HL patients with residual disease treated with the RT had similar long-term survival as those who received RT for consolidation. RT failed to improve the poor survival in patients with post-HDC auto-SCT PD.     

High-dose Therapy and Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation as Consolidation Treatment for Primary Effusion Lymphoma

BackgroundPrimary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare type of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The limited disease-free survival after chemotherapy has resulted in a poor prognosis. The outcomes data for high-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT) for PEL are limited owing to the rarity of the disease.Patients and MethodsThe present study included 9 patients with PEL from 2 major academic centers. Of these patients, 4 had received auto-HCT after high-dose therapy. Of the 9 patients, 8 (89%) had immunodeficiency (7 with human immunodeficiency virus seropositivity; 1, a solid organ transplant recipient) at the diagnosis. Human herpesvirus-8 by immunohistochemistry was positive in 8 patients. Anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy was used as first-line treatment in 7 patients; 4 underwent auto-HCT after attaining first complete remission.ResultsThe median follow-up of the surviving patients was 25 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8%-29%). The 2-year progression-free and overall survival for the 8 patients who had received treatment was 58% (95% CI, 22%-95%) and 73% (95% CI, 41%-100%), respectively. The 2-year progression-free and overall survival for the patients who had received auto-HCT was 50% (95% CI, 1%-99%) and 75% (95% CI, 33%-100%), respectively. Of the 4 auto-HCT recipients, all had been in first complete remission at the time of autografting. The cumulative incidence of relapse was 50% (95% CI, 19%-100%). No deaths were attributable to auto-HCT at 2 years after autografting.ConclusionDespite the small sample size, our data have shown that consolidative auto-HCT is safe and effective and should be considered for eligible patients with PEL after demonstration of an objective response to induction chemotherapy. However, the high relapse rate remains a concern and warrants the development of new strategies to mitigate post-transplantation relapse.     

Consolidative Radiotherapy After Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma

Introduction

We evaluated the role of consolidative radiotherapy (RT) for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

Salvage High-dose Melphalan With Autologous Stem cell Transplantation as Bridge to Consolidation Therapy for Chemoresistant Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma

BackgroundPatients suffering from refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma not responding to salvage chemotherapy have a dismal prognosis. CAR T-cells or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) are potentially curative approaches. However, obtaining a remission, and lowering tumor burden before consolidation seems crucial for long-term efficacy of both treatment modalities.Materials and MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, we reviewed patients with chemoresistant aggressive B-cell lymphoma, defined as being refractory or progressive to at least second line salvage chemotherapy including the regimen immediately preceding autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), treated at 2 tertiary centers, who were eligible for intensive treatment using single agent high-dose (HD) melphalan to obtain a remission before consolidating therapy.ResultsWe identified 36 patients that received single agent HD melphalan and ASCT as remission induction followed by CAR T-cells or allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). Thirteen of the evaluable patients (39.4%) achieved a partial remission and 9 patients (27.73%) a complete remission, resulting in an overall response rate (ORR) of 66.7%. High remission rates were seen across all subgroups including patients with primary refractory lymphoma (ORR 58.3%), uncontrolled disease and high tumor burden as indicated by increased LDH levels (ORR 66.7% for patients with elevated LDH above 2 times upper limit of norm). 22 patients proceeded to allogeneic SCT and 5 to CAR T-cell therapy. Treatment related mortality of ASCT was 5.5% (2 patients, both due to infections). Two-year overall survival of all patients was 15.8%, primarily due to a high non–relapse mortality (45.5%) of allogeneic SCT patients treated with myeloablative conditioning chemotherapy.ConclusionSingle agent HD melphalan produces high remission rates in patients with chemoresistant, uncontrolled aggressive B-cell lymphoma and provides a window of opportunity for consolidation therapy.MicroabstractPatient with refractory/relapsed aggressive B-cell lymphoma after salvage therapy are an unmet medical need because of their very poor prognosis. In our retrospective analysis of 36 patients we showed that single agent high-dose melphalan can achieve high response rates (ORR 66.7%) even in uncontrolled disease enabling consolidation therapy e.g. with allogeneic stem cell transplantation or CAR T-cell therapy.     

高剂量化放疗合并自体骨髓移植治疗晚期难治性恶性淋巴瘤

我们采用高剂量化放疗合并自体骨髓移植治疗５例晚期难治性恶性淋巴瘤，其中何杰金病３例，非何杰金淋巴瘤２例。获得４例完全缓解、１例部分缓解。治疗期间５例病人均来发生与移植有关的致命毒性反应。本研究结果显示高剂量化疗合并自体骨髓移植治疗晚期难治性恶性淋巴瘤，作为诱导治疗后一线方案确能提高临床近期疗效，可使部分病人得以较长期无病生存或治愈。     

Cost Analysis of Autologous Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation Versus Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation for Patients with Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma and Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia

We evaluated the costs of unpurged autologous stem cell transplantation in a non-randomised study of 54 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies who have been transplanted at the Nijmegen University Hospital between July 1992 and March 1998. Thirty-five patients were transplanted with autologous peripheral stem cells (APSCT): 30 had non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 5 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Nineteen patients were transplanted with autologous bone marrow stem cells (ABMT): 17 had NHL and 2 ALL. The number of progenitor cells (CFU-GM, BFU-E) and nucleated cells was significantly higher in peripheral blood transplants. The duration of cytopenia was shorter after APSCT. The leucocyte recovery to 0.5 × 10⁹ /L was 13 days for recipients of peripheral stem cells compared to 20 days for bone marrow recipients (P 4.001). The platelet recoveries to 20 × 10⁹L were 13 and 29 days, respectively (P = 0.001). This resulted in significantly shorter admission duration 24 days after APSCT versus 30 days (P = 0.003) after ABMT.

Furthermore, a statistically significant difference between both groups was observed for antimicrobial costs (mean: fl 2,939 vs fl 4,888; P = 0.008), platelet transfusions (median: 3 vs 7 units; P = 0.01) and erythrocyte transfusions (median: 6 vs 10 units; P = 0.03). The mean overall costs were lower in patients transplanted with stem cells from' peripheral blood: fl 34, 178 versus fl 43, 469 (P = 0.007). This study suggests that the APSCT results in significant cost savings due to shorter hospital stay and less costs of supportive care, despite higher mobilisation costs. The costs of blood transfusions and antimicrobials for patients with ALL were significantly higher when compared to patients with NHL.     

Late Relapses After High-dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma in the Rituximab Era

BackgroundThe standard of care for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapsing after front-line therapy is high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Evidence has suggested that early relapses (ie, within 1 year) after this approach portends exceptionally poor outcomes. However, data examining relapses > 1 year after ASCT for patients with refractory or relapsed DLBCL are limited, in particular, in the rituximab era. We sought to examine the effect of early (≤ 1 year) and late (> 1 year) relapse after ASCT in a single-institution cohort of patients with relapsed and refractory DLBCL treated with chemoimmunotherapy.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis was performed on the data from 85 consecutive patients who had undergone ASCT for biopsy-confirmed relapsed or refractory DLBCL from 2001 to 2010 at the University of Rochester Medical Center. All patients had received rituximab as a part of treatment. Of the 85 patients, 35 developed relapse after ASCT. These 35 patients were divided into 2 groups according to the timing of the relapse (≤ 1 year and > 1 year after ASCT).ResultsThe median follow-up period was 6.4 years. For all patients, the overall survival (OS) from post-ASCT relapse was 5.2 years. For the 27 patients developing relapse at ≤ 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 0.6 year and progression-free survival was 0.4 year. For the 8 patients developing relapse at > 1 year after ASCT, the median OS was 5.9 years and progression-free survival was 2.9 years.ConclusionPatients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL experiencing relapse > 1 year after ASCT had good outcomes. Despite the relative rarity in incidence, a significant risk of relapse of DLBCL after ASCT remains, suggesting the need for continued monitoring because of the possibility of later progression.     

自体干细胞移植治疗T细胞淋巴瘤31例临床分析

目的 探讨自体干细胞移植治疗T细胞淋巴瘤的疗效和其预后因素.方法 回顾性分析31例给予自体干细胞移植治疗的T细胞淋巴瘤的临床资料,观察3年总生存率和无进展生存率,分析一般状况(PS)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、移植前状况、分期、外周T细胞淋巴瘤预后指数(PIT)评分对生存的影响.结果 全组中位随访时间为28(5～68)个月...     

Potential Benefit of Involved-Field Radiotherapy for Patients With Relapsed-Refractory Hodgkin's Lymphoma With Incomplete Response Before Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

IntroductionWe investigated for a possible role for peritransplantation involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) by comparing patients who received IFRT before after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and patients who received salvage chemotherapy (CT) alone.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated 73 consecutive patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with ASCT between 2003 and 2014. Twenty-one patients (28.8%) received peritransplantation radiotherapy. A Cox regression analysis (multivariate analysis; MVA) was performed to evaluate the prognostic role of any risk factor. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated from the date of ASCT. Response to CT and ASCT were evaluated with positron emission tomography (PET) scan.ResultsMedian follow-up was 41 months (range, 1-136 months). Overall, no significant difference appeared between patients who received IFRT and patients treated with CT alone; however, patients who were treated with IFRT had worse prognostic factors. In the MVA, advanced stage at relapse and persistent disease before ASCT (evident on PET scan [PET+]) were related to worse PFS and OS. In patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+, peritransplantation radiotherapy showed higher 3-year OS rates (91.7% vs. 62.3%) and PFS rates (67.5% vs. 50%) compared with patients treated with CT alone, although this difference was not significant (P = .14 and P = .22, respectively).ConclusionIFRT used before or after ASCT might partially compensate for worse prognostic factors among the overall population; subgroup analysis showed a trend for survival benefit at 3 years in patients with limited stage disease at relapse and PET+ before ASCT.     

Outcomes in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia Treated With or Without Autologous or Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

BackgroundOutcomes in patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) have improved; however, a significant number of patients still relapse despite receiving all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic-based therapies.Patients and MethodsOutcomes of patients with relapsed APL who were treated at our institution (1980-2010) and who received HCT were compared with those who received chemotherapy (CT) only.ResultsAmong 40 patients, 24 received HCT (autologous [auto] HCT, 7; allogeneic [allo] HCT, 14; both, 3); 16 received CT only. The median age at diagnosis was 36 years (range, 13-50 years), 31 years (range, 16-58 years), and 44 years (range, 24-79 years) for the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups, respectively. Ten (100%) patients who received auto-HCT and 12 (71%) who received allo-HCT were in complete remission at the time of the HCT. The median follow-ups in the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups were 74 months (range, 26-135 months), 118 months (range, 28-284 months), and 122 months (range, 32-216 months), respectively. Transplantation-related mortality (1 year) after auto-HCT and allo-HCT were 10% and 29%, respectively. The 7-year event-free survival after auto-HCT and allo-HCT was 68.6% and 40.6%, respectively (P = .45). The 7-year overall survival was 85.7%, 49.4%, and 40% in the auto-HCT, allo-HCT, and CT groups, respectively (P = .48).ConclusionBoth auto-HCT and allo-HCT are associated with durable remission and prolonged survival. All 3 strategies (auto-HCT, allo-HCT, CT) were found to be feasible in the relapsed APL setting and result in long-term disease control in selected patients. In this retrospective analysis, overall survival for patients who received HCT was not significantly better than patients who received CT only, but a trend toward better outcomes was seen in patients who underwent auto-HCT, although not statistically significant.     

Favorable Outcome After Adjuvant Involved-Field Radiotherapy After Autologous Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation in Patients With High-Risk Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundPatients with refractory or relapsed lymphoma diagnosed with bulky disease at relapse or with residual disease after salvage treatment are considered to have a dismal outcome, even after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation, as a result of disease recurrence. To minimize the risk of relapse after receipt of a transplant, involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) to sites of either bulky or localized residual disease has been utilized; however, the ideal timing for irradiation remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of IFRT in the early period after transplantation.Patients and MethodsWe retrospectively evaluated the outcome of 24 autografted patients with relapsed/refractory lymphoma who presented with bulky disease at relapse or who had a persistent localized residual mass after salvage treatment and consolidated with IFRT within 4 months after autografting.ResultsNo significant toxicity was noticed during the early postradiotherapy period, while graft function was not impaired. After a median follow-up of 3 years for survivors, 21 patients were alive, 19 of whom were event free, while 2 patients died of disease recurrence and 1 died of treatment-related myelodysplastic syndrome. The 3-year overall, lymphoma relapse-free, and event-free survival rates were 86%, 86%, and 82%, respectively.ConclusionTaking into consideration the poor-risk features of the study cohort, IFRT provided early after autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation showed a safe and well-tolerated toxicity profile and demonstrated long-term effective tumor control, as reflected in the promising survival rates.     

Pegfilgrastim Appears Equivalent to Daily Dosing of Filgrastim to Treat Neutropenia After Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

BackgroundFilgrastim decreases the time to neutrophil recovery after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT). We hypothesized that single-dose pegfilgrastim would mimic multiple daily doses of filgrastim, resulting in an equivalent shortening of post-PBSCT neutropenia.Patients and MethodsPatients who were eligible for PBSCT and aged ≥ 18 years were identified before high-dose chemotherapy, after the harvesting and cryopreservation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (ie, > 2.5 × 10⁶ CD34-positive cells/kg). Eligible patients received either standard carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM) or carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/cyclophosphamide (BEAC) high-dose chemotherapy. Before high-dose chemotherapy, patients were randomly assigned to receive pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 1 (arm A) or weight-based, dose-adjusted filgrastim beginning on day 1 (arm B) after transplantation until neutrophil engraftment.ResultsOne-hundred and one patients were enrolled between April 2003 and April 2007. Three patients were not treated. Demographics were well-balanced in terms of stage at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, histology, and lines of previous therapy. Results (arm A/arm B) pertained to mean doses received (1.0/12.6), mean absolute neutrophil count recovery days (9.3/9.8), red blood cell transfusions (1.7/1.9), red blood cell transfusion units (3.1/3.8), platelet transfusions (3.1/2.8), positive blood culture rate (18%/29.2%), febrile neutropenia (FN; 18%/16.7%), and duration of FN (days; 7.1/6.9). Transplantation-related mortality and grade 3 or 4 adverse events were comparable between arms.ConclusionPegfilgrastim after PBSCT appears equivalent to multiple daily doses of filgrastim. This approach might be considered in lieu of filgrastim, thus obviating the need for multiple daily injections.     

Repeated Spontaneous Pregnancies and Successful Deliveries After Repeated Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and GnRH‐Agonist Treatment

This article presents a case of repeated spontaneous pregnancies and successful deliveries in a young woman treated with repeated stem cell transplantation and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist therapy.Two years ago we published an exceptional case [1] of a young patient who successfully delivered a healthy neonate after spontaneous conception despite two (repeated) stem cell transplantations and aggressive conditioning chemotherapy in parallel with monthly gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) cotreatment (Decapeptyl CR, 3.75 mg; Ferring, Saint-Prex, Switzerland) and irradiation for lymphoma [1]. Against all the odds, this patient conceived again and again delivered a second normal neonate, most probably attributable to the GnRH-a cotreatment during chemotherapy.In brief, this young woman received chemotherapy and, in parallel, monthly depot GnRH-a injections in 1995 when she was 15 years old for stage IV anaplastic lymphoma [1]. Less than 1 year afterward she underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and cyclophosphamide (the BEAC protocol) for persistent disease [1], again with GnRH-a pre- and cotreatment during chemotherapy [1–3]. Her first spontaneous pregnancy occurred at the age of 24 years, but that pregnancy ended in miscarriage. One month later, she conceived again, and that pregnancy developed normally until 25 weeks of gestation, when recurrence of the lymphoma was diagnosed with subsequent intrauterine growth retardation and demise, after dexamethasone, etoposide, ifosfamide, and cisplatin (DVIP) chemotherapy during pregnancy [1]. After pregnancy termination, she again received a GnRH-a in parallel with DVIP and BEAC conditioning, followed by a second autologous SCT. An attempt at in vitro fertilization was discontinued because of a poor response, but 3 months later she spontaneously conceived, and after a normal gestation she delivered, in August 2006, a normal, term, 3,450 gram, female neonate [1]. About 1 year later she spontaneously conceived, for the fourth time, and on August 9, 2008 she again successfully delivered a normal, 3,450 gram, female neonate, with an Apgar score of 10 at 5 minutes.SCT almost invariably induces ovarian failure, irrespective of patient age or treatment protocol [1, 4–6]. Only 0.6% of patients conceive after one autologous or allogeneic SCT, according to a large survey on fertility after SCT, involving 37,362 women [5]. The estimated odds for spontaneous conception after two SCTs are negligible (0.006 × 0.006 = 0.000036) [1, 3–5]. Carter et al. [6] conducted a retrospective study on reproductive function and pregnancy outcomes in 619 women and partners of men treated with autologous or allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. They found that only 3% of their female survivors succeeded in conceiving after one SCT [6]. Thus, theoretically, according to their findings, the estimated odds for spontaneous conception after two SCTs are 0.03 × 0.03 = 0.0009, which is <1:1,000. Although several reports on spontaneous conceptions and deliveries after SCT have been published [7], we are not aware of any publication of repeated successful deliveries after repeated SCT in the same patient. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case.The administration of a GnRH-a before and in parallel with chemotherapy simulates a prepubertal hormonal milieu, and through this mechanism, and/or possibly others [1–3], might have minimized the gonadotoxic effect of chemotherapy and increased the chance of spontaneous ovulations and successful conceptions and deliveries [1–3]. Indeed, similarly, Remérand et al. [8] recently reported on four successful pregnancies in a patient who had been treated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation when she was 4 years old. GnRH-a treatment simulates the prepubertal hormonal milieu, in keeping with our patient''s recent repeated spontaneous gestation, despite SCT [8]. Because most of the methods involving ovarian or egg cryopreservation are not yet clinically established and unequivocally successful, physicians should inform these young women of the possible beneficial effect of a GnRH-a in minimizing gonadal damage and preservation of ovarian function and fertility, in addition to the options of cryopreservation of embryos and ova [1–3].     

High-dose Thiotepa,Busulfan, Cyclophosphamide,and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Upfront Consolidation for Systemic Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma With Synchronous Central Nervous System Involvement

IntroductionSynchronous involvement of the central nervous system (CNS) at the diagnosis of systemic non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is associated with an increased risk for relapse despite complete remission to initial therapy. High-dose chemotherapy with a CNS-directed conditioning regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) holds promise as a consolidative approach.Patients and MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with systemic B-cell NHL and synchronous CNS involvement who received upfront consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy with thiotepa, busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and ASCT while in first complete remission between July 2008 and June 2016 at 2 partner academic institutions.ResultsTwenty patients were identified through the transplant database. The median age at diagnosis was 53 years (range, 37-65 years). The majority had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma histology (n = 17; 85%). The sites of CNS involvement were parenchymal (n = 12; 60%) and leptomeningeal disease (n = 9; 45%). All patients received systemic and CNS-directed therapy prior to transplant, with the most common approaches being R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisolone) (n = 13; 65%) and high-dose intravenous methotrexate (n = 16; 80%), respectively. With a median follow up of 4.4 years after ASCT (range, 2 months-8.5 years), the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free and overall survival were 77% (95% confidence interval, 48%-91%) and 82% (95% confidence interval, 54%-94%), respectively.ConclusionCNS-directed high-dose chemotherapy and ASCT provides durable remission for patients with synchronous aggressive lymphoma and should be strongly considered as consolidative therapy for eligible patients with systemic NHL with CNS involvement in first complete remission.     

Effect of Routine Surveillance Imaging on the Outcomes of Patients With Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma After Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

BackgroundPatients with relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are often treated with autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). After auto-HCT, most transplant centers implement routine surveillance imaging to monitor for disease relapse; however, there is limited evidence to support this practice.Patients and MethodsIn this multicenter, retrospective study, we identified cHL patients (n = 128) who received auto-HCT, achieved complete remission (CR) after transplantation, and then were followed with routine surveillance imaging. Of these, 29 (23%) relapsed after day 100 after auto-HCT. Relapse was detected clinically in 14 patients and with routine surveillance imaging in 15 patients.ResultsWhen clinically detected relapse was compared with to radiographically detected relapse respectively, the median overall survival (2084 days [range, 225-4161] vs. 2737 days [range, 172-2750]; P = .51), the median time to relapse (247 days [range, 141-3974] vs. 814 days [range, 96-1682]; P = .30) and the median postrelapse survival (674 days [range, 13-1883] vs. 1146 days [range, 4-2548]; P = .52) were not statistically different. In patients who never relapsed after auto-HCT, a median of 4 (range, 1-25) surveillance imaging studies were performed over a median follow-up period of 3.5 years.ConclusionA minority of patients with cHL who achieve CR after auto-HCT will ultimately relapse. Surveillance imaging detected approximately half of relapses; however, outcomes were similar for those whose relapse was detected using routine surveillance imaging versus detected clinically in between surveillance imaging studies. There appears to be limited utility for routine surveillance imaging in cHL patients who achieve CR after auto-HCT.     

The Impact of Prior Salvage Treatment With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors on Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Single-Center Experience

IntroductionThe objective of the study was to assess the impact of the previous use of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on the clinical course of Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT).MethodsA single-center, retrospective chart review of adult HL patients who received ASCT from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2019, was conducted. Primary endpoints included the length of stay (LOS) and the composite outcome of late-onset noninfectious fever (LONIF) or late-onset hypotension (LOH) requiring intravenous fluid (IVF) resuscitation. Secondary endpoints included number of days until neutrophil engraftment, documented infections, and corticosteroid use.ResultsA total of 52 HL patients were included. Nine (17%) received ICI before ASCT, and 43 (83%) patients underwent standard salvage chemotherapy. The composite outcome of LONIF or LOH requiring IVF resuscitation was significantly higher in patients previously treated with ICIs compared with those who received standard non-ICI salvage chemotherapy (78% vs. 33%; P = .022). The differences between the median LOS and time to neutrophil engraftment were not statistically significant (P = .94 and P = .083, respectively). All LONIF patients received systemic corticosteroids with symptom resolution.ConclusionThe composite outcome of LONIF or LOH requiring IVF resuscitation was significantly higher in patients who received prior ICI salvage therapy. LOS and time to neutrophil engraftment were not affected by prior ICI therapy. Early institution of steroids may prevent the evolution of additional sequelae associated with engraftment or engraftment-like syndrome that can complicate ASCT.     

Tolerability and Efficacy of Treatment With Azacytidine as Prophylactic or Preemptive Therapy for Myeloid Neoplasms After Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction/BackgroundAzacytidine (AZA) has been used as a promising treatment for relapse after allogeneic transplantation. A clear benefit has been demonstrated when treating patients with a reduced disease burden, thus a prophylactic and preemptive approach to these patients has emerged.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients with myeloid malignancies treated with azacytidine in the posttransplantation setting between September 2013 and April 2018 in a single tertiary care hospital. Of 32 patients analyzed, 21 were treated for prophylactic use and 11 preemptively, with a median follow-up of 20 months. Prophylactic treatment consisted of AZA at 32 mg/m² for 5 days every 28 days, and preemptive treatment of AZA 75 mg/m² for 5 or 7 days per cycle. In addition, 10 patients received one or more donor lymphocyte infusions (DLIs). Two patients presented with infectious complications demanding hospitalization, and 13 patients (10 in the prophylactic group and 3 in the preemptive group) presented graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). Of patients who had GvHD, 3 needed treatment discontinuation. Overall, 12 patients suspended treatment, 8 for disease progression and 1 due to patient request.ResultsIn the prophylactic group, all patients are alive at 1 year with an event-free survival (EFS) of 95%, as only 1 patient relapsed. In the preemptive group, 1-year EFS was 54% and 1-year overall survival was 82%.ConclusionLow-dose AZA in posttransplantation patients with myeloid neoplasms is a well-tolerated therapy with the potential to prevent relapse and maintain stable remissions. Randomized prospective trials are needed to determine patient selection and dosage, timing, and duration of treatment.     

Ofatumumab,Etoposide, and Cytarabine Intensive Mobilization Regimen in Patients with High-risk Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation

BackgroundMore than one-half of high-risk patients with relapsed/refractory (rr) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) relapse after autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). In this phase II study, we investigate the long-term outcomes of high-risk patients with rrDLBCL receiving intensive consolidation therapy (ICT) with OVA (ofatumumab, etoposide, and high-dose cytarabine) prior to auto-HCT.Patients and MethodsThe primary endpoints were the ability of OVA to mobilize peripheral stem cells and the 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate following OVA. Secondary endpoints included safety, 2-year overall survival (OS), impact of cell of origin (COO), and the prognostic utility of next-generation sequencing minimal residual disease (MRD) testing. We simultaneously retrospectively assessed the outcomes of DLBCL patients who underwent ICT with a similar regimen at our institution.ResultsTwenty-seven patients received salvage chemotherapy, with a response rate of 25% in patients with germinal center B-cell (GCB)-DLBCL versus 92% in patients with non-GCB-DLBCL (P = .003). Nineteen responding patients underwent ICT with OVA (100% successful stem cell mobilization). The 2-year PFS and OS rate was 47% and 59%, respectively, with no difference based on COO. Similar findings were observed when the study and retrospective cohorts were combined. Neutropenia was the most common toxicity (47%). MRD-negative patients at the completion of salvage had a median OS of not reached versus 3.5 months in MRD-positive patients (P = .02).ConclusionsOVA followed by auto-HCT is effective and safe for high-risk rrDLBCL. Patients with GCB-DLBCL had a lower response to salvage chemotherapy, but no difference in outcomes based on COO was seen after auto-HCT. MRD testing in the relapsed setting was predictive of long-term survival.