Reliability and validity of a tool to measure the severity of tongue thrust in children: the Tongue Thrust Rating Scale

This study aimed to develop a scale called Tongue Thrust Rating Scale (TTRS), which categorised tongue thrust in children in terms of its severity during swallowing, and to investigate its validity and reliability. The study describes the developmental phase of the TTRS and presented its content and criterion‐based validity and interobserver and intra‐observer reliability. For content validation, seven experts assessed the steps in the scale over two Delphi rounds. Two physical therapists evaluated videos of 50 children with cerebral palsy (mean age, 57·9 ± 16·8 months), using the TTRS to test criterion‐based validity, interobserver and intra‐observer reliability. The Karaduman Chewing Performance Scale (KCPS) and Drooling Severity and Frequency Scale (DSFS) were used for criterion‐based validity. All the TTRS steps were deemed necessary. The content validity index was 0·857. A very strong positive correlation was found between two examinations by one physical therapist, which indicated intra‐observer reliability (r = 0·938, P < 0·001). A very strong positive correlation was also found between the TTRS scores of two physical therapists, indicating interobserver reliability (r = 0·892, P < 0·001). There was also a strong positive correlation between the TTRS and KCPS (r = 0·724, P < 0·001) and a very strong positive correlation between the TTRS scores and DSFS (r = 0·822 and r = 0·755; P < 0·001). These results demonstrated the criterion‐based validity of the TTRS. The TTRS is a valid, reliable and clinically easy‐to‐use functional instrument to document the severity of tongue thrust in children.     

The effect of implant placement in patients with either Kennedy class II and III on oral health‐related quality of life: a prospective clinical trial

There is little evidence of the effect of implants restored with fixed partial dentures on oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) in partially edentulous Kennedy class II and III patients. The aim of this study was to determine the change in OHRQoL in Kennedy classification II and III patients treated with a two‐implant‐supported fixed dental prosthesis (FDP). Kennedy class II and III patients received dental implants and an FDP. Oral health‐related quality of life was measured by administration of the Oral Health Impact Profile‐14 (OHIP‐14NL) questionnaire at intake (T1), 2 weeks after surgery (T2) and after 1 year of loading (T3). The mean OHIP score at T1 was 6·5 ± 1·2, 2·4 ± 1·0 at T2, and 0·9 ± 0·3 at T3. There was a statistically significant difference between T1 and T2 (P = 0·002) and T1 and T3 (P < 0·001) but not between T2 and T3 (P = 0·407). The OHIP score in Kennedy II patients decreased from 4·8 ± 3·2 at T1 to 1·5 ± 2·0 at T2 and 1·1 ± 1·8 at T3, and that in Kennedy III patients decreased from 8·9 ± 9·6 at T1 to 3·6 ± 8·9 at T2 and 0·8 ± 2·2 at T3. There were no statistically significant differences in the reductions in Kennedy II and III patients. Oral health‐related quality of life changed positively in patients treated with implants and an FDP in both groups. There was no change in OHRQoL between the times of implant placement and FDP placement.     

Oral health‐related quality of life in patients with tooth wear

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of tooth wear (TW) on patients' oral health‐related quality of life. A total of 198 participants were included in the study. They belonged to the following four different diagnostic categories: 51 patients with TW, 46 patients with painful temporomandibular disorders (TMD), 43 complete denture wearers and 58 healthy controls. The Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐NL) was used to assess the patients' oral health‐related quality of life. The results of the study show that patients with TW have an impaired oral health‐related quality of life compared with healthy controls (P < 0·001). Furthermore, the impact of TW and of edentulousness do not differ significantly, while both of these oral conditions seem to have a lower impact on quality of life compared with painful TMD (P < 0·05). It was concluded that TW has a negative impact on patients' quality of life. This impact is comparable with that of edentulousness.     

Evaluating the masticatory function after mandibulectomy with colour‐changing chewing gum

The aim of this study was to clarify the usefulness of colour‐changing gum in evaluating masticatory performance after mandibulectomy. Thirty‐nine patients who underwent mandibulectomy between 1982 and 2010 at Kobe University Hospital were recruited in this study. There were 21 male and 18 female subjects with a mean age of 64·7 years (range: 12–89 years) at the time of surgery. The participants included six patients who underwent marginal mandibulectomy, 21 patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and 12 patients who underwent hemimandibulectomy. The masticatory function was evaluated using colour‐changing chewing gum, gummy jelly and a modified Sato's questionnaire. In all cases, the data were obtained more than 3 months after completing the patient's final prosthesis. The colour‐changing gum scores correlated with both the gummy jelly scores (r = 0·634, P < 0·001) and the total scores of the modified Sato's questionnaire (r = 0·537, P < 0·001). In conclusion, colour‐changing gum is a useful item for evaluating masticatory performance after mandibulectomy.     

Improvement in patients with a TMD‐pain report. A 6‐month follow‐up study

Even though chronic TMD pain tends to persist in most patients, some chronic patients show improvement. It is largely unknown which factors contribute to the improvement of chronic pain. The aim of this study is to investigate which factors, from a biopsychosocial perspective, help to predict improvement in patients with a report of TMD pain. Methods: Subjects with a report of TMD pain were recruited in seven TMD clinics. They received a baseline questionnaire which included a wide range of possible predictors for improvement. After 6 months they received a follow‐up questionnaire which included a measure to determine which participants were ‘improved’ or ‘not improved’. To study which predictive variables were associated with improvement, multiple regression models were built. Results: From the 129 patients who responded to the baseline questionnaire, 100 patients also filled in the follow‐up questionnaire (85% women, mean age (years) ± s.d. = 46·0 ± 13·8). Fifty percentage of these subjects had improved at the 6‐month follow‐up. Pain duration was the strongest (negative) predictor for 6‐month improvement (P = 0·009). Also the number of care providers (P = 0·017) and the degree of hindrance on function (P = 0·045) helped to predict improvement. Conclusions: The duration of the TMD‐pain complaint, the number of care practitioners attended and the degree of hindrance on function (negatively) helped to predict 6‐month improvement. No evidence is found to support the role of psychological or social factors on the improvement in patients with a report of TMD pain.     

Assessment of masticatory function in patients with non‐sagittal occlusal discrepancies

Non‐sagittal occlusal discrepancies such as posterior cross‐bite and anterior openbite are common types of malocclusion, but studies on masticatory function related to those malocclusions have been scarce. The aim of this study was to quantify the masticatory performance in patients with non‐sagittal discrepancies compared to those with normal occlusion, using both objective and subjective measures. Maximum bite force and contact area using Dental Prescale^® system as a static objective assessment, Mixing Ability Index (MAI) as a dynamic objective evaluation and food intake ability (FIA) as a subjective assessment were analysed from 21 people in normal occlusion (Group N) and 64 patients with posterior cross‐bite (Group C), anterior openbite (Group O) or both (Group B). The differences of the maximum bite force, the contact area, the MAI and the FIA were compared, and their correlations were figured out. The non‐sagittal malocclusion groups showed lower values in the maximum bite force, the contact area, the MAI and the FIA compared to those in the normal group (P < 0·0001). Compared to Group N, Groups C, O and B showed 61·5%, 42·1% and 40·1% of the maximum bite force, and 84%, 84% and 76% of hard food FIA, respectively. However, there were no significant differences among Groups C, O and B. The MAI showed higher correlation with the FIA (r = 0·38, P < 0·01), than with the maximum bite force and the contact area (both r = 0·24, P < 0·5). These results revealed that masticatory function in patients with non‐sagittal discrepancies is significantly reduced both objectively and subjectively.     

Normative values for the oro‐facial Esthetic Scale in Sweden

This study reports the findings and challenges of the assessment of oro‐facial aesthetics in the Swedish general population and the development of normative values for the self‐reporting Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES). In a Swedish national sample of 1406 adult subjects (response rate: 47%), OES decile norms were established. The influence of sociodemographics (gender, age, and education), oral health status and general health status on OES scores was analysed. Mean ± standard deviation of OES scores was 50·3 ± 15·6 units (0, worst score; 70, best score); <1% of the subjects had the minimum score of 0, and 11% had the maximum score of 70 OES units. Orofacial Esthetic Scale score differences were (i) substantial (>5 OES units) for subjects with excellent/very good versus good to poor oral or general health status; ii) small (2 units), but statistically significant for gender (P = 0·01) and two age groups (P = 0·02), and (iii) absent for subjects with college versus no college education (P = 0·31) or with and without dentures (P = 0·90). To estimate normative values for a self‐reporting health status, instrument is considered an important step in standardisation, and the developed norms provide a frame of reference in the general population to interpret the Orofacial Esthetic Scale scores.     

DEEP Study: does EQ‐5D‐5L measure the impacts of persistent oro‐facial pain?

The EQ‐5D‐5L is a generic quality of life (QOL) measure widely used throughout the world, which has the advantage that it allows health‐state preferences to be elicited. The aim of this study was to examine whether: a) variation in the standardised reference period for EQ‐5D‐5L from ‘today’ to ‘the last month’ had a minimal clinically meaningful difference; (b) EQ‐5D‐5L had convergent validity with a multidimensional pain measure in quantifying the impacts of pain. As part of a larger study into the effectiveness and efficiency of care pathways for persistent orofacial pain (POFP) ( http://research.ncl.ac.uk/deepstudy ), participants with POFP (n = 100) completed two versions of the EQ‐5D‐5L at the same time with different reference periods (‘today’ vs. ‘last month’). Participants also completed the first section of the West Haven–Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (v3) to assess convergent validity. Two‐tailed nonparametric inferential statistics, intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICC), and within‐subject change scores were used to compare the two EQ‐5D‐5L versions. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman's rho correlation coefficients. Health‐state valuations were significantly different (P < 0·01), and there was good similarity between the two versions' ICC 0·86 (95% CI 0·79–0·91). The within‐subject mean change was 0·03 (95% CI 0·01–0·06). For convergent validity, all relationships were significant (P < 0·05) and in the expected directions. EQ‐5D‐5L demonstrates sufficient convergent validity to be used with POFP, and a change in the standard reference period may be unnecessary if a multidimensional pain measure is also used.     

Effect of prosthetic restoration on oral health‐related quality of life in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study

The aim of this multicentre prospective study was to investigate the effect of prosthetic restoration for missing posterior teeth in patients with shortened dental arches (SDAs). SDA patients with 2–12 missing occlusal units (a pair of occluding premolars corresponds to one unit, and a pair of occluding molars corresponds to two units) were consecutively recruited from seven university‐based dental hospitals in Japan. Patients chose no replacement of missing teeth or prosthetic treatment with removable partial dentures (RPDs) or implant‐supported fixed partial dentures (IFPDs). Oral health‐related quality of life (OHRQoL) was measured using the oral health impact profile (Japanese version – OHIP‐J) at baseline and follow‐up/post‐treatment evaluation. Of the 169 subjects who completed baseline evaluation, 125 subjects (mean age; 63·0 years) received follow‐up/post‐treatment evaluation. No‐treatment was chosen by 42% (53/125) of the subjects, and 58% (72/125) chose treatment with a RPD (n = 53) or an IFPD (n = 19). In the no‐treatment (NT) group, the mean OHIP summary score at baseline was similar to that at follow‐up evaluation (P = 0·69). In the treatment (TRT) group, the mean OHIP summary score decreased significantly after the RPD treatment (P = 0·002), and it tended to decrease, though not statistically significant (P = 0·18), after the IFPD treatment. The restoration of one occlusal unit was associated with a 1·2‐point decrease in OHIP summary score (P = 0·034). These results suggest that the replacement of missing posterior teeth with RPDs or IFPDs improved OHRQoL. Prosthetic restoration for SDAs may benefit OHRQoL in patients needing replacement of missing posterior teeth.     

Tongue‐to‐palate resistance training improves tongue strength and oropharyngeal swallowing function in subacute stroke survivors with dysphagia

Tongue function can affect both the oral and pharyngeal stages of the swallowing process, and proper tongue strength is vital for safe oropharyngeal swallowing. This trial investigated the effect of tongue‐to‐palate resistance training (TPRT) on tongue strength and oropharyngeal swallowing function in stroke with dysphagia patients. This trial was performed using a 4‐week, two‐group, pre–post‐design. Participants were allocated to the experimental group (n = 18) or the control group (n = 17). The experimental group performed TPRT for 4 weeks (5 days per week) and traditional dysphagia therapy, whereas the control group performed traditional dysphagia therapy on the same schedule. Tongue strength was measured using the Iowa Oral Performance Instrument. Swallowing function was measured using the videofluoroscopic dysphagia scale (VDS) and penetration–aspiration scale (PAS) based on a videofluoroscopic swallowing study. Experimental group showed more improved in the tongue strength (both anterior and posterior regions, P = 0·009, 0·015). In addition, the experimental group showed more improved scores on the oral and pharyngeal phase of VDS (P = 0·029, 0·007), but not on the PAS (P = 0·471), compared with the control group. This study demonstrated the effectiveness of TPRT in increasing tongue muscle strength and improving swallowing function in patients with post‐stroke dysphagia. Therefore, we recommend TPRT as an easy and simple rehabilitation strategy for improving swallowing in patients with dysphagia.     

Recognition of patient‐reported impairment in oral aesthetics

The objectives of this study were to investigate the degree of effective recognition by professionals of patient‐estimated oral aesthetic impairment and the most reliable aspects in such recognition. Participants consisted of 95 patients with partial dentition in need of prosthodontic replacements. The oral aesthetics was professionally evaluated using the Prosthetic Esthetic Index (PEI), compiling 13 aesthetic aspects and an overall evaluation. The patient‐reported impairment was evaluated using the Oral Health Impact Profile Aesthetic (OHIP‐Aes) and the Oral Esthetic Scale (OES). Background variables were as follows: gender, age, work situation, education level, marital status, number and location of teeth, wearing a removable dental prosthesis (RDP) and smile line. A significant correlation was found between the overall professional evaluation and the OHIP‐Aes score (R = 0·43, P < 0·05), the OES score (R = 0·46, P < 0·05) and the overall patient evaluation (0·35, P < 0·05). Correlations of the 13 specific aspects of the PEI with the patient‐reported evaluations were generally small to moderate: the aspect ‘discoloration of the teeth’ showed the highest correlation. The multivariate analyses showed that up to 57% of the patient‐reported impairment could be explained by the professionally evaluated oral aesthetic in combination with background variables. Discoloration of the teeth was the greatest explanatory variable, but also dental arch symmetry, and position and colour of the teeth were significant aspects. A high percentage of the patient‐reported aesthetic impairment can be recognised by the professionals. The most reliable aspect is discoloration of the teeth, but also dental arch symmetry, and the position and colour of the teeth are important for recognising the aesthetic impairment.     

Continuous measurement of intra‐oral pH and temperature: development,validation of an appliance and a pilot study

To describe a novel approach for continuous measurement of intra‐oral pH and temperature in individuals carrying out normal daily activities over 24 h. We designed, validated and constructed a custom‐made appliance fitted with a pH probe and a thermocouple. Six subjects wore the appliance over a 24‐h period for two non‐consecutive days, while the intra‐oral pH and temperature were measured continuously and recorded. Intra‐oral pH and temperature were very similar across different recording days, the difference being not statistically significant (P ≥ 0·14). There was a noticeable difference in the pattern of variation of pH between day and night. During the day, the mean pH was 7·3 (±0·4) and dropped markedly only after consumption of acidic food and drinks. The intra‐oral pH decreased slowly during sleep with an average pH of 6·6 (±0·4) being recorded. The difference between day and night was statistically significant (P = 0·002). The mean intra‐oral temperature was 33·9 °C (±0·9) during daytime and 35·9 °C (±0·5) during sleep (P = 0·013) with minor fluctuations occurring over 24 h. The continuous and simultaneous intra‐oral pH and temperature measurement system described in this report is reliable, easy to construct, able to measure variables over a sustained period and may serve as a future diagnostic tool in a number of applications.     

Chlorhexidine gel and less difficult surgeries might reduce post‐operative pain,controlling for dry socket,infection and analgesic consumption: a split‐mouth controlled randomised clinical trial

Reports on post‐surgical pain are a few, controversial and flawed (by statistics and analgesic consumption). Besides, it is not known if chlorhexidine can reduce post‐extraction pain adjusting for its effect on prevention of infection and dry socket (DS). We assessed these. A total of 90 impacted mandibular third molars of 45 patients were extracted. Intra‐alveolar 0·2% chlorhexidine gel was applied in a split‐mouth randomised design to one‐half of the sockets. None of the included patients took antibiotics or analgesics afterwards. In the first and third post‐operative days, DS formation and pain levels were recorded. Predictive roles of the risk factors were analysed using fixed‐effects (classic) and multilevel (mixed‐model) multiple linear regressions (α = 0·05, β≤0·1). In the first day, pain levels were 5·56 ± 1·53 and 4·78 ± 1·43 (out of 10), respectively. These reduced to 3·22 ± 1·41 and 2·16 ± 1·40. Pain was more intense on the control sides [both P values = 0·000 (paired t‐test)]. Chlorhexidine had a significant pain‐alleviating effect (P = 0·0001), excluding its effect on DS and infection. More difficult surgeries (P = 0·0201) and dry sockets were more painful (P = 0·0000). Age had a marginally significant negative role (P = 0·0994). Gender and smoking had no significant impact [P ≥ 0·7 (regression)]. The pattern of pain reduction differed between dry sockets and healthy sockets [P = 0·0102 (anova )]. Chlorhexidine can reduce pain, regardless of its infection‐/DS‐preventive effects. Simpler surgeries and sockets not affected by alveolar osteitis are less painful. Smoking and gender less likely affect pain. The role of age was not conclusive and needs future studies.     

Evaluation of masticatory function after maxillectomy using a colour‐changing chewing gum

The purpose of this study was to identify the risk factors associated with the masticatory dysfunction after maxillectomy using a colour‐changing chewing gum. Thirty‐nine patients who underwent maxillectomy between January 2002 and May 2010 in the Department of Kobe University Hospital were recruited for this study. There were 20 male and 19 female subjects, with a median age of 73·3 years (range of 44–90) at the time of surgery. The intra‐oral conditions after maxillectomy were classified by HS classification, and the masticatory function was evaluated by a colour‐changing chewing gum and the results of a modified Sato's questionnaire. The scores of the colour‐changing gum were closely correlated with the scores of the modified Sato's questionnaire (r = 0·661, P < 0·01). A logistic regression analysis with the outcome variable of the gum test <4 demonstrated that significant predictors for the masticatory dysfunction were the number of anchor teeth ≤2 and a soft palate defect. A colour‐changing gum was found to be useful for evaluating the post‐operative masticatory function, and it was important to conserve the anchor teeth and the soft palate to avoid masticatory dysfunction.     

Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES‐NL) in dental patients with and without self‐reported tooth wear

The aim of this study was to test the psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) in dental patients with and without self‐reported tooth wear. The English version of the OES was translated into Dutch, following established guidelines for cross‐cultural adaptation of health‐related quality of life measures. The reliability of the resulting OES‐NL was tested in a test–retest study on 343 subjects; its validity was tested with the use of convergent validity on 582 subjects. The test–retest reliability of the OES‐NL showed intra‐class correlation coefficients (ICC) that ranged from 0·76 to 0·82, which can be qualified as excellent. The Cronbach's alpha revealed that the overall internal consistency of the scale was good (α = 0·89). Convergent validity was confirmed by the association between the OES‐NL summary scores and three questions of the Dutch version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP‐NL). The calculated Spearman's rank correlation coefficients ranged from −0·43 to −0·54 and were all significant (P < 0·001). The Dutch version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES‐NL) showed good psychometric properties, making it suitable for the assessment of self‐perceived aesthetics in Dutch dental patients with and without self‐reported tooth wear.     

Comparison of utility weighted DMFT with patient‐reported oral well‐being

This study investigated a method of measuring oral health, as opposed to measuring disease. The objective was to compare DMF score and whole mouth utility scores to a patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM). Disutility values for lost and restored teeth were used to weight the decayed, missing and filled teeths(DMFTs) of 10 adult patients. This gave two whole mouth utility scores (WMU). These scores were then compared with a patient‐reported oral health outcome measure recorded by the use of a visual analogue scale (VAS). The anchors for the VAS were ‘my mouth could not be worse’ and ‘my mouth could not be better’. There was a positive correlation (r = 0·6457) between WMU1 and the patient‐reported outcome measure (P < 0·05) and a negative correlation (r = ?0·8383) between WMU1 and DMFT which was significant at the P < 0·01 level. There was a statistically significant positive correlation of r = 0·7926 between WMU2 and the patient‐reported outcome measure (P < 0·01) and a negative correlation (r = ?0·9393) between WMU2 and DMFT (P < 0·01). The Pearson's correlation between DMFT and the patient‐reported outcome measure was ?0·8757, which was significant at the 0·01 level. Patient reports of their perceived level of health correlate well with DMFT scores. Weighting DMFT scores according to the differential values assigned to missing, or missing and filled, teeth does not increase the degree of correlation between the measure and the patients’ personal quantification of their oral health. Decayed, missing and filled teeth therefore seems to adequately capture the patient's sense of well‐being.     

Speech outcome in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate – a comparison of three methods of the hard palate closure

The aim of this study was to compare the speech in subjects with cleft lip and palate, in whom three methods of the hard palate closure were used. One hundred and thirty‐seven children (96 boys, 41 girls; mean age = 12 years, SD = 1·2) with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (CUCLP) operated by a single surgeon with a one‐stage method were evaluated. The management of the cleft lip and soft palate was comparable in all subjects; for hard palate repair, three different methods were used: bilateral von Langenbeck closure (b‐vL group, n = 39), unilateral von Langenbeck closure (u‐vL group, n = 56) and vomerplasty (v‐p group, n = 42). Speech was assessed: (i) perceptually for the presence of a) hypernasality, b) compensatory articulations (CAs), c) audible nasal air emissions (ANE) and d) speech intelligibility; (ii) for the presence of compensatory facial grimacing, (iii) with clinical intra‐oral evaluation and (iv) with videonasendoscopy. A total rate of hypernasality requiring pharyngoplasty was 5·1%; total incidence post‐oral compensatory articulations (CAs) was 2·2%. The overall speech intelligibility was good in 84·7% of cases. Oronasal fistulas (ONFs) occurred in 15·7% b‐vL subjects, 7·1% u‐vL subjects and 50% v‐p subjects (P < 0·001). No statistically significant intergroup differences for hypernasality, CAs and intelligibility were found (P > 0·1). In conclusion, the speech after early one‐stage repair of CUCLP was satisfactory. The method of hard palate repair affected the incidence of ONFs, which, however, caused relatively mild and inconsistent speech errors.     

Oropharyngeal dysphagia in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis alters quality of life

Dysphagia is one of the most important complications encountered in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Our aim was to determine whether oropharyngeal dysphagia impacted the quality of life (QoL) of patients with ALS. Thirty consecutive patients were recruited (31–82 years, 18 men). Swallowing function was evaluated using a standardised videofluoroscopic barium swallow. All the patients completed a specific questionnaire on quality of life in dysphagia (SWAL‐QoL) immediately after the videofluoroscopy. The results of dysphagia outcome severity scale separated 14 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia and 16 with normal swallowing function. There was no difference in the average age, weight and body mass index of the two groups (dysphagic patients: 68 ± 11 kg versus non‐dysphagic patients: 69 ± 14 kg). Most of the dysphagic patients had a bulbar affection based on their Norris scores which determine the importance of cranial nerves illness (20 ± 8), significantly lower than those of the non‐dysphagic patients (35 ± 5) (P < 0·0001). There was no difference in the neurological peripheral symptoms evaluated by Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale scores (dysphagic patients: 26 ± 7 versus non‐dysphagic patients: 27 ± 8) (ns). The swallowing quality of life questionnaire revealed that the dysphagic patients had significant burden (P < 0·001). They were affected by the necessity to applied a food selection (P < 0·01), by the increase in eating duration (P < 0·05) and described a decrease in eating desire (P < 0·05). They complained of fear regarding the risk of dysphagia (P < 0·05). They also described difficulties with oral communication (P < 0·001). All of those complained about dysphagia which impacted directly mental health (P < 0·05) and social life (P < 0·05). In conclusion, oropharyngeal dysphagia is a common symptom accompanying ALS, which alters the patient's QoL, especially social health.     

Oral appliance therapy versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome: a randomised,placebo‐controlled trial on self‐reported symptoms of common sleep disorders and sleep‐related problems

Obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) is associated with several sleep disorders and sleep‐related problems. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effects of a mandibular advancement device (MAD) with those of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) on self‐reported symptoms of common sleep disorders and sleep‐related problems in mild and moderate OSAS patients. In this randomised placebo‐controlled trial, sixty‐four OSAS patients (52·0 ± 9·6 years) were randomly assigned to an MAD, nCPAP or an intra‐oral placebo appliance in a parallel design. All participants filled out the validated Dutch Sleep Disorders Questionnaire (SDQ) twice: one before treatment and one after six months of treatment. With 88 questions, thirteen scales were constructed, representing common sleep disorders and sleep‐related problems. Linear mixed model analyses were performed to study differences between the groups for the different SDQ scales over time. The MAD group showed significant improvements over time in symptoms corresponding with ‘insomnia’, ‘excessive daytime sleepiness’, ‘psychiatric sleep disorder’, ‘periodic limb movements’, ‘sleep apnoea’, ‘sleep paralysis’, ‘daytime dysfunction’, ‘hypnagogic hallucinations/dreaming’, ‘restless sleep’, ‘negative conditioning’ and ‘automatic behaviour’ (range of P values: 0·000–0·014). These improvements in symptoms were, however, not significantly different from the improvements in symptoms observed in the nCPAP and placebo groups (range of P values: 0·090–0·897). It can be concluded that there is no significant difference between MAD and nCPAP in their positive effects on self‐reported symptoms of common sleep disorders and sleep‐related problems in mild and moderate OSAS patients. These beneficial effects may be a result of placebo effects.