Graft and patient outcomes of zero‐human leucocyte‐antigen‐mismatched deceased and live donor kidney transplant recipients

Greater compatibility of human leucocyte antigen (HLA) alleles between kidney donors and recipients may lead to improved graft outcomes. This study aimed to compare the incidence of acute rejection and graft failure in zero‐HLA‐mismatched recipients of living‐related (LD) and deceased donor (DD) kidney transplants. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, we compared the risk of any acute rejection and biopsy‐proven acute rejection (BPAR) and graft failure in recipients of zero‐HLA‐mismatched kidneys between LD and DD using logistic and Cox regression models. Of the 931 zero‐HLA‐mismatched recipients transplanted between 1990 and 2012, 19 (2.0%) received kidneys from monozygotic/dizygotic twins (twin), 500 (53.7%) from nontwin LD and 412 (44.3%) from DD. Twin kidney transplant recipients did not experience rejection. Compared to DD transplant recipients, the risk of any acute rejection (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95%CI 0.34–0.79, P = 0.002) and overall graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 0.55, 95%CI 0.41–0.73, P < 0.001) was significantly lower in LD recipients independent of initial immunosuppression, but not for BPAR (adjusted odds ratio 0.52, 95%CI 0.16–1.64, P = 0.263). Zero‐HLA‐mismatched DD kidney transplant recipients have a significantly higher risk of any acute rejection episodes and graft loss compared to zero‐HLA‐mismatched LD kidney transplant recipients. A cautious and careful approach in reducing immunosuppression appears to be warranted in this group of transplant recipients.     

Long‐term outcome of belatacept therapy in de novo kidney transplant recipients – a case‐match analysis

While belatacept has shown favorable short‐ and midterm results in kidney transplant recipients, only projections exist regarding its potential impact on long‐term outcome. Therefore, we performed a retrospective case‐match analysis of the 14 belatacept patients originally enrolled in the phase II multicenter trial at our center. Fifty six cyclosporine (CyA)‐treated patients were matched according to age at transplantation, first/retransplant, and donor type. Ten years after kidney transplantation, kidney function remained superior in belatacept‐treated patients compared with the CyA control group. Moreover, none of the belatacept‐treated patients had donor‐specific antibodies ≥10 years post‐transplantation compared with 38.5% of tested CyA‐treated subject (0/10 vs. 5/13; P = 0.045). Notably, however, patient and graft survival was virtually identical in both groups (71.4% vs. 71.3%; P = 0.976). In the present single‐center study population, patients treated with belatacept demonstrated a patient and graft survival at 10 years post‐transplant which was comparable to that of similarly selected CNI‐treated patients. Larger studies with sufficient statistical power are necessary to definitively determine long‐term graft survival with belatacept.     

Long‐term outcome of renal transplantation from octogenarian donors: A multicenter controlled study

To assess whether biopsy‐guided selection of kidneys from very old brain‐dead donors enables more successful transplantations, the authors of this multicenter, observational study compared graft survival between 37 recipients of 1 or 2 histologically evaluated kidneys from donors older than 80 years and 198 reference‐recipients of non–histologically evaluated single grafts from donors aged 60 years and younger (transplantation period: 2006‐2013 at 3 Italian centers). During a median (interquartile range) of 25 (13‐42) months, 2 recipients (5.4%) and 10 reference‐recipients (5.1%) required dialysis (crude and donor age‐ and sex‐adjusted hazard ratio [95% confidence interval] 1.55 [0.34‐7.12], P = .576 and 1.41 [0.10‐19.54], P = .798, respectively). Shared frailty analyses confirmed similar outcomes in a 1:2 propensity score study comparing recipients with 74 reference‐recipients matched by center, year, donor, and recipient sex and age. Serum creatinine was similar across groups during 84‐month follow‐up. Recipients had remarkably shorter waiting times than did reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (7.5 [4.0‐19.5] vs 36 [19‐56] and 40 [24‐56] months, respectively, P < .0001 for both comparisons). Mean (± SD) kidney donor risk index was 2.57 ± 0.32 in recipients vs 1.09 ± 0.24 and 1.14 ± 0.24 in reference‐recipients and matched reference‐recipients (P < .0001 for both comparisons). Adverse events were similar across groups. Biopsy‐guided allocation of kidneys from octogenarian donors permits further expansion of the donor organ pool and faster access to a kidney transplant, without increasing the risk of premature graft failure.     

Outcomes and risk stratification for late antibody‐mediated rejection in recipients of ABO‐incompatible kidney transplants: a retrospective study

The required intensity of monitoring for antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) after of ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation is not clearly formulized. We retrospectively evaluated a single‐center cohort of 115 ABO‐incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplant recipients, of which 32% were also HLA incompatible (ABOi/HLAi) with their donors. We used an adjusted negative binomial model to evaluate risk factors for late AMR. Using this model, we risk‐stratified patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups for the development of late AMR; 26% of patients had at least one AMR episode; 49% of AMR episodes occurred within 30‐days after transplant and were considered early AMR. Patients with an early AMR episode had a 5.5‐fold greater incidence of developing late AMR [IRR = 5.5, (95% CI: 1.5–19.3), P = 0.01]. ABOi/HLAi recipients trended toward increased late AMR risk [IRR = 1.9, (95% CI: 0.5–6.6), P = 0.3]. High‐risk recipients (those with an early AMR or those who were ABOi/HLAi) had a sixfold increased incidence of late AMR [IRR = 6.3, (95% CI: 1.6–24.6), P = 0.008] versus low‐risk recipients. The overall incidence of late AMR was 20.8% vs. 1.5% in low‐risk recipients. Changes in anti‐A/B titer did not correlate with late AMR (IRR = 0.9 per log titer increase, P = 0.7). This risk‐stratification scheme uses information available within 30 days of ABOi transplantation to determine risk for late AMR and can help direct longitudinal follow‐up for individual patients.     

Ciprofloxacin for BK viremia prophylaxis in kidney transplant recipients: Results of a prospective,double‐blind,randomized, placebo‐controlled trial

In kidney transplantation, BK virus infection has historically resulted in high rates of graft dysfunction and graft loss. Unlike other opportunistic infections, no therapies have been shown to prevent BK. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ciprofloxacin for the prevention of BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients. Two hundred kidney transplant recipients were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial comparing a 3‐month course of ciprofloxacin (n = 133) vs placebo (n = 67) for the prevention of BK viremia. The primary endpoint of BK viremia at month 6 posttransplant occurred in 25 (18.8%) patients in the ciprofloxacin group and 5 (7.5%) in the placebo group (P = .03). Higher rates of BK viremia (23.3% vs 11.9%; P = .06) and BK nephropathy (5.8% vs 1.5%; P = .26) remained at 12 months in the ciprofloxacin group. Ciprofloxacin use was associated with a significantly higher rate of fluoroquinolone‐resistant gram‐negative infections (83.3% vs 50%; P = .04). A 3‐month course of ciprofloxacin was ineffective at preventing BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients and was associated with an increased risk of fluoroquinolone‐resistant infections. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01789203.     

Impact of donor age on long‐term outcomes after delayed graft function: 10‐year follow‐up

Delayed graft function (DGF) has a negative impact on graft survival in donation after brain death (DBD) but not for donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys. However, older donor age is associated with graft loss in DCD transplants. We sought to examine the interaction between donor age and DGF in DBD kidneys. This is a single‐center, retrospective review of 657 consecutive DBD recipients transplanted between 1990 and 2005. We stratified the cohort by decades of donor age and studied the association between DGF and graft failure using Cox models. The risk of graft loss associated with DGF was not significantly increased for donor age below 60 years (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12, 1.51, and 0.90, respectively, for age <40, 41–50 and 51–60 years) but significantly increased after 60 years (aHR 2.67; P = 0.019). Analysis of death‐censored graft failure yielded similar results for donor age below 60 years and showed a substantially increased risk with donors above 60 years (aHR 6.98, P = 0.002). This analysis reveals an unexpectedly high impact of older donor age on the association between DGF and renal transplant outcomes. Further research is needed to determine the best use of kidneys from donors above 60 years old, where DGF is expected.     

Minimization of maintenance immunosuppressive therapy after renal transplantation comparing cyclosporine A/azathioprine or cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil bitherapy to cyclosporine A monotherapy: a 10‐year postrandomization follow‐up study

Long‐term outcomes in renal transplant recipients withdrawn from steroid and submitted to further minimization of immunosuppressive regimen after 1 year are lacking. In this multicenter study, 204 low immunological risk kidney transplant recipients were randomized 14.2 ± 3.7 months post‐transplantation to receive either cyclosporine A (CsA) + azathioprine (AZA; n = 53), CsA + mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; n = 53), or CsA monotherapy (n = 98). At 3 years postrandomization, the occurrence of biopsy for graft dysfunction was similar in bitherapy and monotherapy groups (21/106 vs. 26/98; P = 0.25). At 10 years postrandomization, patients’ survival was 100%, 94.2%, and 95.8% (P = 0.25), and death‐censored graft survival was 94.9%, 94.7%, and 95.2% (P = 0.34) in AZA, MMF, and CsA groups, respectively. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate was 70.4 ± 31.1, 60.1 ± 22.2, and 60.1 ± 19.0 ml/min/1.73 m², respectively (P = 0.16). The incidence of biopsy‐proven acute rejection was 1.4%/year in the whole cohort. None of the patients developed polyomavirus‐associated nephropathy. The main cause of graft loss (n = 12) was chronic antibody‐mediated rejection (n = 6). De novo donor‐specific antibodies were detected in 13% of AZA‐, 21% of MMF‐, and 14% of CsA‐treated patients (P = 0.29). CsA monotherapy after 1 year is safe and associated with prolonged graft survival in well‐selected renal transplant recipient ( ClinicalTrials.gov number: 980654).     

Pediatric deceased donor kidney transplant outcomes under the Kidney Allocation System

The Kidney Allocation System (KAS) has resulted in fewer pediatric kidneys being allocated to pediatric deceased donor kidney transplant (pDDKT) recipients. This had prompted concerns that post‐pDDKT outcomes may worsen. To study this, we used SRTR data to compare the outcomes of 953 pre‐KAS pDDKT (age <18 years) recipients (December 4, 2012–December 3, 2014) with the outcomes of 934 post‐KAS pDDKT recipients (December 4, 2014–December 3, 2016). We analyzed mortality and graft loss by using Cox regression, delayed graft function (DGF) by using logistic regression, and length of stay (LOS) by using negative binomial regression. Post‐KAS recipients had longer pretransplant dialysis times (median 1.26 vs 1.07 years, P = .02) and were more often cPRA 100% (2.0% vs 0.1%, P = .001). Post‐KAS recipients had less graft loss than pre‐KAS recipients (hazard ratio [HR]: _0.350.54_0.83, P = .005) but no statistically significant differences in mortality (HR: _0.290.72_1.83, P = .5), DGF (odds ratio: _0.931.32_1.93, P = .2), and LOS (LOS ratio: _0.961.06_1.19, P = .4). After adjusting for donor–recipient characteristics, there were no statistically significant post‐KAS differences in mortality (adjusted HR: _0.371.04_2.92, P = .9), DGF (adjusted odds ratio: _0.941.41_2.13, P = .1), or LOS (adjusted LOS ratio: _0.931.04_1.16, P = .5). However, post‐KAS pDDKT recipients still had less graft loss (adjusted HR: _0.380.59_0.91, P = .02). KAS has had a mixed effect on short‐term posttransplant outcomes for pDDKT recipients, although our results are limited by only 2 years of posttransplant follow‐up.     

Effects of expanded allocation programmes and organ and recipient quality metrics on transplant‐related costs in kidney transplantation – an institutional analysis

Expansions of donor pools have a controversial impact on healthcare expenditures. The aim of this study was to investigate the emerging costs of expanded criteria donor (ECD) kidney transplantations (KT) and to identify independent risk factors for increased transplant‐related costs. We present a retrospective explorative analysis of hospital costs and reimbursements of KTs performed between 2012 and 2016 in a German university hospital. A total of 174 KTs were examined, including 92 (52.9%) ECD organ transplantations. The ECD group comprised 43 (24.7%) ‘old‐for‐old’ transplantations. Median healthcare costs were 19 570€ (IQR 18 735–27 405€) in the standard criteria donor (SCD) group versus 25 478€ (IQR 19 957–29 634€) in the ECD group (+30%; P = 0.076). ‘Old‐for‐old’ transplantations showed the highest healthcare expenditures [26 702€ (19 570–33 940€)]. Irrespective of the allocation group, transplant‐related costs increased significantly in obese (+6221€; P = 0.009) and elderly recipients (+6717€; P = 0.019), in warm ischaemia time exceeding 30 min (+3212€; P = 0.009) and in kidneys with DGF or surgical complications (+8976€ and +10 624€; both P < 0.001). Transplantation of ECD organs is associated with incremental costs, especially in elderly and obese recipients. A critical patient selection, treatment of obesity before KT and keeping warm ischaemia times short seem to be crucial, in order to achieve a cost‐effective KT regardless of the allocation group.     

Colonisation with methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus prior to renal transplantation is associated with long‐term renal allograft failure

Renal transplant recipients are at an increased risk of developing Methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus due to their immunosuppressed status. Herein, we investigate the incidence of MRSA infection in patients undergoing renal transplantation and determine the effect of MRSA colonisation on renal allograft function and overall mortality. Between January 1st 2007 and December 31st 2012, 1499 consecutive kidney transplants performed in our transplant unit and a retrospective 1:2 matched case‐control study was performed on this patient cohort. The 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year overall graft survival rates were 100%, 86% and 78%, respectively, in MRSA positive recipients compared with 100%, 100% and 93%, respectively, in the control group (P < 0.05). The 1‐, 3‐ and 5‐year overall patient survival rates were 100%, 97% and 79%, respectively, in MRSA positive recipients compared with 100%, 100% and 95%, respectively, in the control group (P = 0.1). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, colonisation with MRSA pre‐operatively was an independent predictor for renal allograft failure at 5 years (hazard ratio: 4.6, 95% confidence interval: 1–30.7, P = 0.048). These findings demonstrate that the incidence of long‐term renal allograft failure is significantly greater in this patient cohort compared with a matched control population.     

Dynamics of early post‐operative plasma ddcfDNA levels in kidney transplantation: a single‐center pilot study

Donor‐derived cell‐free DNA (ddcfDNA) is reported to be a promising noninvasive biomarker for acute rejection in organ transplant. However, studies on monitoring ddcfDNA dynamics during the early periods after organ transplantation are scarce. Our study assessed the dynamic variation in ddcfDNA in early period with various types and status of kidney transplantation. Target region capture sequencing used identifies ddcfDNA level in 21 kidney transplant recipients. Median ddcfDNA level was 20.69% at the initial time post‐transplant, and decreased to 5.22% on the first day and stayed at the stable level after the second day. The ddcfDNA level in DCD (deceased donors) group (44.99%) was significantly higher than that in LDRT (living donor) group (10.24%) at initial time, P < 0.01. DdcfDNA level in DGF (delayed graft function) recipients was lower (23.96%) than that in non‐DGF (47.74%) at the initial time, P = 0.89 (19.34% in DGF and 4.46% in non‐DGF on the first day, P = 0.17). DdcfDNA level at initial time significantly correlated with serum creatinine (r² = 0.219, P = 0.032) and warm ischemia time (r² = 0.204, P = 0.040). Plasma ddcfDNA level decreased rapidly follow an L‐shaped curve post‐transplant, and level in DGF declined slower than non‐DGF. The rebound of ddcfDNA level may indicate the occurrence of acute rejection.     

Kidney transplant outcomes associated with the use of increased risk donors in children

Increased risk donors (IRDs) may inadvertently transmit blood‐borne viruses to organ recipients through transplant. Rates of IRD kidney transplants in children and the associated outcomes are unknown. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify pediatric deceased donor kidney transplants that were performed in the United States between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. We used the Cox regression analysis to compare patient and graft survival between IRD and non‐IRD recipients, and a sequential Cox approach to evaluate survival benefit after IRD transplants compared with remaining on the waitlist and never accepting an IRD kidney. We studied 328 recipients with and 4850 without IRD transplants. The annual IRD transplant rates ranged from 3.4% to 13.2%. IRDs were more likely to be male (P = .04), black (P < .001), and die from head trauma (P = .006). IRD recipients had higher mean cPRA (0.085 vs 0.065, P = .02). After multivariate adjustment, patient survival after IRD transplants was significantly higher compared with remaining on the waitlist (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26‐0.88, P = .018); however, patient (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.54‐1.59, P = .79) and graft survival (aHR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70‐1.13, P = .32) were similar between IRD and non‐IRD recipients. We recommend that IRDs be considered for transplant in children.     

Kidney transplant from uncontrolled donation after circulatory death donors maintained by nECMO has long‐term outcomes comparable to standard criteria donation after brain death

Uncontrolled donation after circulatory death (uDCD) increases organ availability for kidney transplant (KT) with short‐term outcomes similar to those obtained from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. However, heterogeneous results in the long term have been reported. We compared 10‐year outcomes between 237 KT recipients from uDCD donors maintained by normothermic extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (nECMO) and 237 patients undergoing KT from standard criteria DBD donors during the same period at our institution. We further analyzed risk factors for death‐censored graft survival in the uDCD group. Delayed graft function (DGF) was more common in the uDCD group (73.4% vs 46.4%; P < .01), although glomerular filtration rates at the end of follow‐up were similar in the 2 groups. uDCD and DBD groups had similar rates for 10‐year death‐censored graft (82.1% vs 80.4%; P = .623) and recipient survival (86.2% vs 87.6%; P = .454). Donor age >50 years was associated with graft loss in the uDCD group (hazard ratio: 1.91; P = .058), whereas the occurrence of DGF showed no significant effect. uDCD KT under nECMO support resulted in similar graft function and long‐term outcomes compared with KT from standard criteria DBD donors. Increased donor age could negatively affect graft survival after uDCD donation.     

History of psychosis and mania,and outcomes after kidney transplantation ‐ a retrospective study

History of psychosis or mania, if uncontrolled, both represent relative contraindications for kidney transplantation. We examined 3680 US veterans who underwent kidney transplantation. The diagnosis of history of psychosis/mania was based on a validated algorithm. Measured confounders were used to create a propensity score‐matched cohort (n = 442). Associations between pretransplantation psychosis/mania and death with functioning graft, all‐cause death, graft loss, and rejection were examined in survival models and logistic regression models. Post‐transplant medication nonadherence was assessed using proportion of days covered (PDC) for tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid in both groups. The mean ± SD age of the cohort at baseline was 61 ± 11 years, 92% were male, and 66% and 27% of patients were white and African‐American, respectively. Compared to patients without history of psychosis/mania, patients with a history of psychosis/mania had similar risk of death with functioning graft [subhazard ratio (SHR) (95% confidence interval (CI)): 0.94(0.42–2.09)], all‐cause death [hazard ratio (95% CI): 1.04 (0.51–2.14)], graft loss [SHR (95% CI): 1.07 (0.45–2.57)], and rejection [odds ratio(95% CI): 1.23(0.60–2.53)]. Moreover, there was no difference in immunosuppressive drug PDC in patients with and without history of psychosis/mania (PDC: 76 ± 21% vs. 78 ± 19%, P = 0.529 for tacrolimus; PDC: 78 ± 17% vs. 79 ± 18%, P = 0.666 for mycophenolic acid). After careful selection, pretransplantation psychosis/mania is not associated with adverse outcomes in kidney transplant recipients.     

Pre‐existing donor‐specific antibodies are detrimental to kidney allograft only when persistent after transplantation

Donor‐specific antibodies (DSA) increase the risk of allograft rejection and graft failure. They may be present before transplant or develop de novo after transplantation. Here, we studied the evolution of preformed DSA and their impact on graft outcome in kidney transplant recipients. Using the Luminex Single Antigen assay, we analyzed the sera on the day of transplantation of 239 patients who received a kidney transplant. Thirty‐seven patients (15.5%) had pre‐existing DSA detected the day of transplantation. After 5 years, the pre‐existing DSA disappeared in 22 patients whereas they persisted in 12. Variables associated with DSA persistence were age <50 years (P = 0.009), a history of previous transplantation (P = 0.039), the presence of class II DSA (P = 0.009), an MFI of preformed DSA >3500 (P < 0.001), and the presence of two or more DSA (P < 0.001). DSA persistence was associated with a higher risk of graft loss and antibody‐mediated rejection. Previously undetected preformed DSA are deleterious to graft survival only when they persist after transplantation.     

Sirolimus vs mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in primary combined pancreas and kidney transplantation. Results of a long‐term prospective randomized study

The study was intended to compare pancreas graft survival rates in two groups of pancreas and kidney transplant recipients prospectively randomized to treatment either with sirolimus or MMF. From 2002 to 2013, 238 type 1 diabetic recipients with end‐stage kidney disease were randomized 1:1 to sirolimus or MMF treatment. Noncensored pancreas survival at 5 years was 76.4 and 71.6% for sirolimus and MMF groups, respectively (P > .05). Death‐censored pancreas survival was better in the sirolimus group (P = .037). After removal of early graft losses pancreas survival did not differ between groups (MMF 83.1% vs sirolimus 91.6%, P = .11). Nonsignificantly more grafts were lost due to rejection in the MMF group (10 vs 5; P = .19). Cumulative patient 5‐year survival was 96% in the MMF group and 91% in the sirolimus group (P > .05). Five‐year cumulative noncensored kidney graft survival rates did not statistically differ (85.6% in the sirolimus group and 88.8% in MMF group). Recipients treated with MMF had significantly more episodes of gastrointestinal bleeding (7 vs 0, P = .007). More recipients in the sirolimus group required corrective surgery due to incisional hernias (21 vs 12, P = .019). ClinicalTrials No.: NCT 03582878.     

The duration of asystolic ischemia determines the risk of graft failure after circulatory‐dead donor kidney transplantation: A Eurotransplant cohort study

Circulatory death donor (DCD) kidney transplantations are steadily increasing. Consensus reports recommend limiting donor warm ischemia time (DWIT) in DCD donation, although an independent effect on graft outcome has not been demonstrated. We investigated death‐censored graft survival in 18 065 recipients of deceased‐donor kidney transplants in the Eurotransplant region: 1059 DCD and 17 006 brain‐dead donor (DBD) kidney recipients. DWIT was defined as time from circulatory arrest until cold flush. DCD donation was an independent risk factor for graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.28, 95% CI 1.10‐1.46), due to an increased risk of primary nonfunction (62/1059 vs 560/17 006; P < .0001). With DWIT in the model, DCD donation was no longer a risk factor, demonstrating that DWIT explains the inferior graft survival of DCD kidneys. Indeed, DCD transplants with short DWIT have graft survival comparable to that of standard‐criteria DBD transplants (P = .59). DWIT also associated with graft failure in DCDs (adjusted HR 1.20 per 10‐minute increase, 95% CI 1.03‐1.42). At 5 years after transplantation, graft failure occurred in 14 of 133 recipients (10.5%) with DWIT <10 minutes, 139 of 555 recipients (25.0%) with DWIT between 10 and 19 minutes, and 117 of 371 recipients (31.5%) with DWIT ≥20 minutes. These findings support the expert opinion–based guidelines to limit DWIT.     

The liver recipient with acute renal dysfunction: A single institution evaluation of the simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant candidate

The Organ Procurement Transplant Network (OPTN) listing criteria for simultaneous liver‐kidney transplant (SLK) are not well defined. Concerns remain about rising numbers of SLKs, which divert quality kidneys from candidates awaiting kidney transplants (KT). We performed a retrospective review of liver transplants (LTs) at our center from 2004 to 2014; 127 recipients (liver transplant alone; 102 LTA, 25 SLK) were identified with short‐term preoperative kidney dysfunction (creatinine >4 mg/dL or preoperative hemodialysis [HD] for <6 weeks). Both cohorts had comparable baseline demographic characteristics with the exception of higher model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score in the LTA group (41.4 vs 32.9, P < .0001) and higher incidence of pre‐LT diabetes in the SLK cohort (52% vs 26.5%, P = .0176). Duration of pre‐LT HD was higher in SLK recipients, but the difference was not statistically significant (P = .39). Renal nonrecovery (RNR) rate in LTA cohort was low (<5%). No significant difference was noted in 1‐year mortality, liver graft rejection/failure, or length of stay (LOS) between the cohorts. Thus, it appears that liver recipients with short‐term (<6 weeks) HD or AKI without HD have comparable outcomes between LTA and SLK. With provisions for a KT safety net, as proposed by OPTN, LTA may be the most adequate option for these patients.     

Outcomes of kidney transplant from deceased donors with acute kidney injury and prolonged cold ischemia time – a retrospective cohort study

While deceased donor renal transplants (DDRT) from donors with either acute kidney injury (AKI) or long cold ischemia time (CIT) are associated with increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), recipients of these kidneys have good patient and allograft survival. There are limited data on whether kidneys with both AKI and long CIT have outcomes similar to kidneys with only one of these insults. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed transplant outcomes in patients (2005–2015) receiving kidneys with AKI (terminal creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dl) and CIT 24–30 h (n = 1289), 30–36 h (n = 734), and >36 h (n = 614), using kidneys with AKI and CIT <24 h (n = 5434) as a reference. DGF was more common with increasing CIT up to 36 h, then decreased slightly (41.2% vs. 46.8% vs. 52.5% vs. 50.2%, P < 0.001). Death‐censored graft survival (DCGS) at 3 years was better with CIT <24 h compared with other groups (92.5% vs. 90.8% vs. 92% vs. 89.2%, P = 0.018). On multivariable analysis, donor creatinine was predictive of DCGS, whereas only CIT >36 h was predictive of DCGS (aHR 1.27, P = 0.03). Recipients transplanted with kidneys with both AKI and long CIT have excellent intermediate‐term outcomes.     

Impact of the kidney allocation system on young pediatric recipients

The kidney allocation system (KAS) altered pediatric candidate prioritization. We determined KAS's impact on pediatric kidney recipients by examining delayed graft function (DGF) rates from 2010 to 2016. A propensity score‐matched pediatric recipients pre‐ and post‐KAS. A semiparametric decomposition analysis estimated the contributions of KAS‐related changes in donor characteristics and dialysis time on DGF rate. The unadjusted odds of DGF were 69% higher post‐KAS for young (<10 years at listing) recipients (N = 1153, P = .02) but were not significantly increased for older pediatric (10‐17 years at listing) recipients (N = 2624, P = .48). Post‐KAS, young recipients received significantly fewer pediatric (<18 years) donor kidneys (21% vs 32%, P < .01) and had longer median pretransplant dialysis time (603 vs 435 days, P < .01). After propensity score matching, post‐KAS status increased the odds of DGF in young recipients 71% (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.01‐2.46). In decomposition analysis, 24% of the higher DGF rate post‐KAS was attributable to donor characteristics and 19% to increased recipient dialysis time. In a confirmatory survival analysis, DGF was associated with a 2.2 times higher risk of graft failure (aHR2.28, 95% CI 1.46‐3.54). In conclusion, KAS may lead to worse graft survival outcomes in children. Allocation changes should be considered.