Outcomes of kidney transplant from deceased donors with acute kidney injury and prolonged cold ischemia time – a retrospective cohort study

While deceased donor renal transplants (DDRT) from donors with either acute kidney injury (AKI) or long cold ischemia time (CIT) are associated with increased risk of delayed graft function (DGF), recipients of these kidneys have good patient and allograft survival. There are limited data on whether kidneys with both AKI and long CIT have outcomes similar to kidneys with only one of these insults. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we analyzed transplant outcomes in patients (2005–2015) receiving kidneys with AKI (terminal creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dl) and CIT 24–30 h (n = 1289), 30–36 h (n = 734), and >36 h (n = 614), using kidneys with AKI and CIT <24 h (n = 5434) as a reference. DGF was more common with increasing CIT up to 36 h, then decreased slightly (41.2% vs. 46.8% vs. 52.5% vs. 50.2%, P < 0.001). Death‐censored graft survival (DCGS) at 3 years was better with CIT <24 h compared with other groups (92.5% vs. 90.8% vs. 92% vs. 89.2%, P = 0.018). On multivariable analysis, donor creatinine was predictive of DCGS, whereas only CIT >36 h was predictive of DCGS (aHR 1.27, P = 0.03). Recipients transplanted with kidneys with both AKI and long CIT have excellent intermediate‐term outcomes.     

Incidence,Risk Factors,and Outcomes of Delayed Graft Function in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation

ObjectiveDelayed graft function (DGF) is the most significant complication of a cadaveric kidney transplant. We aim to evaluate the predictable risk factors of DGF and its effects on the recipient and graft survival.MethodFrom January 2014 to December 2017, the medical records from 62 patients who received a kidney transplant from a deceased donor were retrospectively reviewed. We classified recipients into 2 groups. The risk factors of DGF associated with donor, recipient, and transplant procedures were analyzed. DGF's effects on the graft survival were examined.ResultsThe incidence rate of DGF was 43.5%. Older ages of donors, marginal donors (n = 15), length of stay in the intensive care unit, and terminal serum creatinine concentrations were observed to be statistically significant compared to recipients without DGF (P < .5). The ratio of serum creatinine concentrations before/after brain death was found to be significant for the groups with DGF (P < .05). Cold ischemia time (CIT) was examined as the most significant risk factor on DGF (P = .001). One-year patient survival rates were 94.5% and 92.3%, and graft survival rates were 92.1% and 87.5% (P = .05), respectively, for the groups with and without DGF.ConclusionOlder ages of donors, occurrence of acute kidney injury, its grade just before harvesting, and long duration of CIT are the most important risk factors for DGF. Brain death management, shortening the time between brain death and harvesting, and also shortening the duration of CIT can decrease the risk of DGF and can increase the graft survival.     

Impact of machine perfusion after long static cold storage on delayed graft function incidence and duration and time to hospital discharge

Delayed graft function (DGF) is very high in our center (70%‐80%), and we usually receive a kidney for transplant after more than 22 hours of static cold ischemia time (CIT). Also, there is an inadequate care of the donors, contributing to a high rate of DGF. We decided to test whether machine perfusion (MP) after a CIT improved the outcome of our transplant patients. We analyzed the incidence of DGF, its duration, and the length of hospital stay (LOS) in patients who received a kidney preserved with MP after a CIT (hybrid perfusion—HP). We included 54 deceased donors kidneys preserved with HP transplanted from Feb/13 to Jul/14, and compared them to 101 kidney transplants preserved by static cold storage (CS) from Nov/08 to May/12. The median pumping time was 11 hours. DGF incidence was 61.1% vs 79.2% (P = .02), median DGF duration was 5 vs 11 days (P < .001), and median LOS was 13 vs 18 days (P < .011), for the HP compared to CS group. The observed reduction of DGF with machine perfusion did not occur in donors over 50 years old. In the multivariate analysis, risk factors for DGF, adjusted for CIT, were donor age (OR, 1.04; P = .005) and the absence of use of MP (OR, 1.54; P = .051). In conclusion, the use of HP contributed to faster recovery of renal function and to a shorter length of hospital stay.     

Duration of delayed graft function and outcomes after kidney transplantation from controlled donation after circulatory death donors: a retrospective study

The impact of the duration of delayed graft function (DGF) on graft survival is poorly characterized in controlled donation after circulatory death (DCD) donor kidney transplantation. A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 DCD donor kidney transplants between 2011 and 2016. When patients with primary nonfunction were excluded (n = 9), 141 recipients (65%) had DGF, with median (IQR) duration of dialysis dependency of 6 (2–11.75) days. Longer duration of dialysis dependency was associated with lower estimated glomerular filtration rate at 1 year, and a higher rate of acute rejection. On Kaplan–Meier analysis, the presence of DGF was associated with lower graft survival (log‐rank test P = 0.034), though duration of DGF was not (P = 0.723). However, multivariable Cox regression analysis found that only acute rejection was independently associated with lower graft survival [HR (95% CI) 4.302 (1.617–11.450); P = 0.003], whereas the presence of DGF and DGF duration were not. In controlled DCD kidney transplantation, DGF duration itself may not be independently associated with graft survival; rather, it may be that acute rejection associated with prolonged DGF is the poor prognostic factor.     

Shipping living donor kidneys and transplant recipient outcomes

Kidney paired donation (KPD) is an important tool to facilitate living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). Concerns remain over prolonged cold ischemia times (CIT) associated with shipping kidneys long distances through KPD. We examined the association between CIT and delayed graft function (DGF), allograft survival, and patient survival for 1267 shipped and 205 nonshipped/internal KPD LDKTs facilitated by the National Kidney Registry in the United States from 2008 to 2015, compared to 4800 unrelated, nonshipped, non‐KPD LDKTs. Shipped KPD recipients had a median CIT of 9.3 hours (range = 0.25‐23.9 hours), compared to 1.0 hour for internal KPD transplants and 0.93 hours for non‐KPD LDKTs. Each hour of CIT was associated with a 5% increased odds of DGF (adjusted odds ratio: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02‐1.09, P < .01). However, there was not a significant association between CIT and all‐cause graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.98‐1.04, P = .4), death‐censored graft failure ( [aHR]: 1.02, 95% CI, 0.98‐1.06, P = .4), or mortality (aHR 1.00, 95% CI, 0.96‐1.04, P > .9). This study of KPD‐facilitated LDKTs found no evidence that long CIT is a concern for reduced graft or patient survival. Studies with longer follow‐up are needed to refine our understanding of the safety of shipping donor kidneys through KPD.     

Nighttime Kidney Transplant From Donor With Controlled Cardiac Death: Greater Functionality at the Cost of More Complications?

BackgroundKidney transplantation surgery from controlled cardiac death donor (Maastricht III) is frequently performed at night, without taking into account the accumulated fatigue that the surgical team may experience. The objective of the study is to assess whether surgical complications and the functionality of the graft in the short and long term are affected by the time of day in which kidney transplantation from controlled cardiac death donors is performed.MethodsA retrospective observational study was carried out. Patient were classified according to the start of surgery, daytime hours (8:00 AM to 7:59 PM), and nighttime hours (8:00 PM to 7:59 AM). Baseline and intraoperative parameters, postoperative complications, and parameters related to graft functionality were analyzed.ResultsA total of 77 patients were included: 37 patients had kidney transplantations performed during the daytime (48.05%), and 40 patients had kidney transplantations performed at nighttime (51.95%). No statistically significant differences were found between the baseline characteristics of both groups except for sex (55.0% men in daytime vs 78.4% men in nighttime, P = .03) and time on pretransplant dialysis (33.1 months in daytime vs 13.8 months in nighttime, P = .008). The incidence of surgical complications and the functionality of the graft was similar in both groups; however, the surgical time was shorter in night transplants (163.2 minutes in daytime vs 136.5 minutes at nighttime, P = .0006)ConclusionThe performance of kidney transplants at night is not associated, either in the short or long term, with an increase in surgical complications or conditions leading to the deterioration in the functionality of the graft.     

Is prolonged cold ischemia a contraindication to using kidneys from acute kidney injury donors?

To determine the impact of prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) on the outcome of acute kidney injury (AKI) renal grafts, we therefore performed a single‐center retrospective analysis in adult patients receiving kidney transplantation (KT) from AKI donors. Outcomes were stratified according to duration of CIT. A total of 118 patients receiving AKI grafts were enrolled. Based on CIT, patients were stratified as follows: (i) <20 hours, 27 patients; (ii) 20‐30 hours, 52 patients; (iii) 30‐40 hours, 30 patients; (iv) ≥40 hours, nine patients. The overall incidence of delayed graft function DGF was 41.5%. According to increasing CIT category, DGF rates were 30%, 42%, 40%, and 78%, respectively (P = .03). With a mean follow‐up of 48 months, overall patient and graft survival rates were 91% and 81%. Death‐censored graft survival (DCGS) rates were 84% and 88% for patients with and without DGF (P = NS). DCGS rates were 92% in patients with CIT <20 hours compared to 85% with CIT >20 hours (P = NS). In the nine patients with CIT >40 hours, the 4‐year DCGS rate was 100%. We conclude that prolonged CIT in AKI grafts may not adversely influence outcomes and so discard of AKI kidneys because of projected long CIT is not warranted when donors are wisely triaged.     

Risk factors for and outcomes of delayed graft function in live donor kidney transplantation – a retrospective study

Delayed graft function (DGF) in deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with worse outcomes. DGF has been less well studied in live donor transplantation. We aimed to examine the risk factors for DGF, and associations between DGF and short‐ and long‐term outcomes in live donor kidney transplant recipients. Using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we included live donor kidney transplants performed in Australia and New Zealand over 2004–2015 and excluded pediatric recipients (n = 440), pathological donors (n = 97), grafts that failed in the first week (as a proxy for primary non function; n = 38), and grafts with missing DGF data (n = 46). We used multivariable logistic regression to identify the risk factors for DGF and the association between DGF and rejection at 6 months; Cox proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between DGF and patient and graft survival; and linear regression to examine the association between DGF and eGFR at 1 year. DGF occurred in 77 (2.3%) of 3358 transplants. Risk factors for DGF included right‐sided kidney [odds ratio (OR) 2.00 (95% CI 1.18, 3.40)], donor BMI [OR 1.06 per kg/m² (95% CI 1.01, 1.12)]; increasing time on dialysis and total ischemic time [OR 1.09 per hour (1.00, 1.17)]. DGF was associated with increased risk of rejection at 6 months [OR 2.37 (95% CI 1.41, 3.97)], worse patient survival [HR 2.14 (95% CI 1.21, 3.80)] and graft survival [HR 1.98 (95% CI 1.27, 3.10)], and worse renal function at 1 year [Coefficient ‐9.57 (95% CI ?13.5, ?5.64)]. DGF is uncommon after live donor kidney transplantation, but associated with significantly worse outcomes. The only modifiable risk factors identified were kidney side and total ischemic time.     

Can it wait until morning? A comparison of nighttime versus daytime cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis

Background

The urgency of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is under debate. We hypothesized that nighttime cholecystectomy is associated with decreased length of stay.

Methods

Retrospective review of 1,140 patients at 2 large urban referral centers with acute cholecystitis who underwent daytime (7 am to 7 pm) versus nighttime (7 pm to 7 am) cholecystectomy was conducted.

Results

Nighttime cholecystectomy did not affect the overall length of stay (3.7 vs 3.8 days, P = .08) or complication rate (5% vs 7%, P = .5) versus daytime cholecystectomy. Nighttime cholecystectomy was associated with a higher conversion rate to open cholecystectomy (11% vs 6%, P = .008). On multivariable analysis, independent predictors of conversion to open surgery were nighttime cholecystectomy, age, and gangrenous cholecystitis (P = .01). The only predictor of complications was gangrenous cholecystitis (P = .02).

Conclusions

Nighttime cholecystectomy is associated with an increased conversion to open surgery without decrease in length of stay or complications. These findings suggest that laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis should be delayed until normal working hours.     

Predictors and outcomes of delayed graft function after living‐donor kidney transplantation

Delayed graft function (DGF) following deceased donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior outcomes. Delayed graft function following living‐donor kidney transplantation is less common, but its impact on graft survival unknown. We therefore sought to determine risk factors for DGF following living‐donor kidney transplantation and DGF's effect on living‐donor kidney graft survival. We analyzed living‐donor kidney transplants performed between 2000 and 2014 in the UNOS dataset. A total of 64 024 living‐donor kidney transplant recipients were identified, 3.6% developed DGF. Cold ischemic time, human leukocyte antigen mismatch, donor age, panel reactive antibody, recipient diabetes, donor and recipient body mass index, recipient race and gender, right nephrectomy, open nephrectomy, dialysis status, ABO incompatibility, and previous transplants were independent predictors of DGF in living‐donor kidney transplants. Five‐year graft survival among living‐donor kidney transplant recipients with DGF was significantly lower compared with graft survival in those without DGF (65% and 85%, respectively, P < 0.001). DGF more than doubled the risk of subsequent graft failure (hazard ratio = 2.3, 95% confidence interval: 2.1–2.6; P < 0.001). DGF after living‐donor kidney transplantation is associated with inferior allograft outcomes. Minimizing modifiable risk factors may improve outcomes in living‐donor kidney transplantation.     

Factors That Influence Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplants: A Single-Center Paired Kidney Analysis

BackgroundThe risk factors associated with delayed graft function (DGF) and its impact in kidney transplant (KTx) outcomes remains controversial; it is possible that donor renal characteristics influence the initial graft function in KTx.ObjectiveEvaluate risk factors associated with DGF and its impact in KTx outcomes.MethodsOne hundred six mate KTx mate recipients performed in a single center were grouped according to the presence or absence of DGF.ResultsDonors were predominantly men (58%); 70% were standard criteria type, with a mean Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 62% ± 28%, median age of 42 ± 15 and presenting hospitalization time of 6 ± 5 days. KTx recipients presented an overall DGF rate of 82%, lasting 12 ± 7 days. Pairs presenting DGF were older than pairs without DGF (P = .008), while cold ischemia time (CIT) was significantly shorter in the group without DGF compared to those presenting DGF (P = .003). The KDPI of the KTx pairs was significantly higher in pairs with DGF versus without DGF (P = .04). No statistically significant differences in 1 year allograft and patient survival were observed. Recipient age (odds ratio = 6.3, confidence interval = 1.5–25.8; P = .009) and CIT (odds ratio = 4.6, confidence interval = 1.2–17.7; P = .002) were significantly associated with DGF.ConclusionThis study suggests that recipient age, cold ischemic time, and KDPI are factors associated with DGF. In addition, DGF had no impact on 1-year renal function, allograft, and patient survival. In the transplant conditions of our country, Brazil, CIT seems to represent an important variable to be managed, and the aim should be to reduce this factor as much as possible.     

Impact of early lymph node procurement to facilitate histocompatibility testing on long-term cadaveric kidney graft survival

Background

Prolonged cold ischemia time (CIT) is a clinically important causes of delayed graft function (DGF) after kidney transplantation. As DGF has been previously shown to have a deleterious influence on long-term graft survival, in the present study we analyzed the impact of early lymph node (LN) procurement on CIT, HLA mismatches, and long-term kidney graft outcome.

Materials and Methods

We evaluated 394 consecutive cadaveric procedures performed from 2001 to 2006, including 289 recipients, in whom LN were obtained before kidney procurement seeking to shorten the total time for HLA typing and crossmatch procedures.

Results

During 58 ± 6 months, 24 patients died (918 [8.3%] in the early and 6 [5.7%] in late procurement group, P = ns) and 52 lost their kidney grafts (31 [10.7%] vs 21 [20%]; P = .025). Early procurement of LN performed in 73.4% of all kidney graft recipients shortened CIT by almost 7 hours (22.9 vs 16.1 hours; P < .001), with a nonsignificantly lower incidence of DGF (32.2% vs 41.0%; P = .13). However, a Cox proportional hazards regression model revealed that early procurement reduced the risk of death-censored kidney graft loss by roughly 40% (log-rank, P = .013).

Conclusion

Early LN procurement in significantly shorten CIT and subsequently reduced the risk of long-term kidney graft loss.     

Machine perfusion of donor kidneys may reduce graft rejection

Recent evidence suggests that hypothermic machine perfusion of donor kidneys reduces delayed graft function (DGF). This study addresses the effect of machine perfusion (MP) on allograft rejection in the United States. We assembled a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing kidney‐alone transplants in the UNOS database from June 30, 2004 to May 31, 2017. DGF was defined as dialysis requirement in the first week post‐transplant; graft rejection was defined at 6 months and 1 year. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for recipient and donor factors evaluated the effect of MP on DGF and graft rejection. Records for 79 300 kidney transplants meeting inclusion criteria were abstracted, 42% of which underwent MP. MP kidneys came from older donors, were more likely to have been obtained following donation after cardiac death, and had longer cold ischemic times. Rates of DGF and rejection were similar between MP and static storage kidneys. Following adjustment, recipients of MP kidneys were less likely to experience rejection at 1 year (OR 0.91 [95% CI 0.86‐0.97] P = .002), but not at 6 months post‐transplantation (OR 0.94 [0.88‐1.02] P = .07). This effect persisted following adjustment for cold ischemic time. This study adds to the accumulating evidence demonstrating improved outcomes following MP of kidneys. We encourage protocolized consideration of MP for kidney grafts.     

Effect of Cold Ischemia Time on Kidney Graft Function and Survival: Differences Between Paired Kidney Transplants From the Same Donor

Introduction

Kidney transplantation procedures commonly result in a cold ischemia time (CIT) gap when both kidney grafts are implanted in the same center. Owing to logistics, the procedure is usually consecutive, first accomplishing one surgery and then the other. CIT constitutes an independent risk factor for the development of delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplants. The effect that CIT exerts on graft and patient survival is still unclear. This study evaluates the relation of CIT and transplant outcomes by comparing paired kidney transplants in terms of survival and graft function.

Impact of the kidney allocation system on young pediatric recipients

The kidney allocation system (KAS) altered pediatric candidate prioritization. We determined KAS's impact on pediatric kidney recipients by examining delayed graft function (DGF) rates from 2010 to 2016. A propensity score‐matched pediatric recipients pre‐ and post‐KAS. A semiparametric decomposition analysis estimated the contributions of KAS‐related changes in donor characteristics and dialysis time on DGF rate. The unadjusted odds of DGF were 69% higher post‐KAS for young (<10 years at listing) recipients (N = 1153, P = .02) but were not significantly increased for older pediatric (10‐17 years at listing) recipients (N = 2624, P = .48). Post‐KAS, young recipients received significantly fewer pediatric (<18 years) donor kidneys (21% vs 32%, P < .01) and had longer median pretransplant dialysis time (603 vs 435 days, P < .01). After propensity score matching, post‐KAS status increased the odds of DGF in young recipients 71% (OR 1.71, 95% CI 1.01‐2.46). In decomposition analysis, 24% of the higher DGF rate post‐KAS was attributable to donor characteristics and 19% to increased recipient dialysis time. In a confirmatory survival analysis, DGF was associated with a 2.2 times higher risk of graft failure (aHR2.28, 95% CI 1.46‐3.54). In conclusion, KAS may lead to worse graft survival outcomes in children. Allocation changes should be considered.     

Financial impact of delayed graft function in kidney transplantation

Increased utilization of suboptimal organs in response to organ shortage has resulted in increased incidence of delayed graft function (DGF) after transplantation. Although presumed increased costs associated with DGF are a deterrent to the utilization of these organs, the financial burden of DGF has not been established. We used the Premier Healthcare Database to conduct a retrospective analysis of healthcare resource utilization and costs in kidney transplant patients (n = 12 097) between 1/1/2014 and 12/31/2018. We compared cost and hospital resource utilization for transplants in high-volume (n = 8715) vs low-volume hospitals (n = 3382), DGF (n = 3087) vs non-DGF (n = 9010), and recipients receiving 1 dialysis (n = 1485) vs multiple dialysis (n = 1602). High-volume hospitals costs were lower than low-volume hospitals ($103 946 vs $123 571, P < .0001). DGF was associated with approximately $18 000 (10%) increase in mean costs ($130 492 vs $112 598, P < .0001), 6 additional days of hospitalization (14.7 vs 8.7, P < .0001), and 2 additional ICU days (4.3 vs 2.1, P < .0001). Multiple dialysis sessions were associated with an additional $10 000 compared to those with only 1. In conclusion, DGF is associated with increased costs and length of stay for index kidney transplant hospitalizations and payment schemes taking this into account may reduce clinicians’ reluctance to utilize less-than-ideal kidneys.     

Delayed kidney graft function in simultaneous pancreas‐kidney transplant recipients is associated with early pancreas allograft failure

Delayed graft function (DGF) is a common complication associated with significant untoward effects in kidney‐alone transplantation. The incidence and outcomes following kidney delayed graft function (K‐DGF) among patients undergoing simultaneous pancreas‐kidney (SPK) transplantation are less certain. We analyzed SPK recipients transplanted at our center between January 1994 and December 2017. A total of 632 recipients fulfilled the selection criteria, including 69 (11%) with K‐DGF and 563 without. The incidence of K‐DGF was significantly higher in recipients of organs from older donors and donation after circulatory death (DCD). The presence of K‐DGF was significantly associated with an increased risk of pancreas graft failure during the first 90 days (n = 9, incidence rate [IR] 2.45/100 person‐months), but not with late pancreas failure (n = 32, IR 0.84/100 person‐months), kidney graft failure, or patient death. Although DCD was associated with K‐DGF, it was not associated with either pancreas (hazard ratio [HR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.58‐1.44, P = .69) or kidney (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.66‐1.82, P = .74) graft failure after adjustment for potential confounders. We found K‐DGF to be a significant risk factor for pancreas graft failure but not kidney graft failure, with the major risk period being early (<90 days) posttransplant, and the major donor risk factor being older donor age.     

The relative influence of delayed graft function and acute rejection on renal transplant survival

Three hundred and eight cadaveric renal transplants were analysed to establish the effects of acute rejection in the first 90 days and delayed graft function (DGF) on graft outcome. There were 120 patients (39%) with no DGF and no rejection (group 1), 101 patients (33%) with rejection but no DGF (group 2), 41 patients (13%) with DGF but no rejection (group 3) and 46 patients (15%) with both rejection and DGF (group 4). The actuarial 4-year graft survival rates for groups 1,2,3 and 40.4%, respectively. The acute rejection rate was 101/221 (46%) in patients with initial graft function compared with 46/87 (53%) for those with DGF (²=1.02, P=0.31). Cox stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that DGF was a more powerful predictive factor for poor graft survival (P=0.001) than acute rejection occurring in the first 90 days post-transplant (P=0.034). Further efforts at improving graft outcome should concentrate on reducing the incidence of DGF.     

Transplantation of kidneys from uncontrolled donation after circulatory determination of death: comparison with brain death donors with or without extended criteria and impact of normothermic regional perfusion

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of kidney transplants from uncontrolled DCD (uDCD) with kidney transplants from extended (ECD) and standard criteria donors (SCD). In this multicenter study, we included recipients from uDCD (n = 50), and from ECD (n = 57) and SCD (n = 102) who could be eligible for a uDCD program. We compared patient and graft survival, and kidney function between groups. To address the impact of preservation procedures in uDCD, we compared in situ cold perfusion (ICP) with normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Patient and graft survival rates were similar between the uDCD and ECD groups, but were lower than the SCD group (P < 0.01). Although delayed graft function (DGF) was more frequent in the uDCD group (66%) than in the ECD (40%) and SCD (27%) groups (P = 0.08 and P < 0.001), graft function was comparable between the uDCD and ECD groups at 3 months onwards post‐transplantation. The use of NRP in the uDCD group (n = 19) was associated with a lower risk of DGF, and with a better graft function at 2 years post‐transplantation, compared to ICP‐uDCD (n = 31) and ECD. In conclusion, the use of uDCD kidneys was associated with post‐transplantation results comparable to those of ECD kidneys. NRP preservation may improve the results of uDCD transplantation.     

Kidney transplant outcomes associated with the use of increased risk donors in children

Increased risk donors (IRDs) may inadvertently transmit blood‐borne viruses to organ recipients through transplant. Rates of IRD kidney transplants in children and the associated outcomes are unknown. We used the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to identify pediatric deceased donor kidney transplants that were performed in the United States between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2015. We used the Cox regression analysis to compare patient and graft survival between IRD and non‐IRD recipients, and a sequential Cox approach to evaluate survival benefit after IRD transplants compared with remaining on the waitlist and never accepting an IRD kidney. We studied 328 recipients with and 4850 without IRD transplants. The annual IRD transplant rates ranged from 3.4% to 13.2%. IRDs were more likely to be male (P = .04), black (P < .001), and die from head trauma (P = .006). IRD recipients had higher mean cPRA (0.085 vs 0.065, P = .02). After multivariate adjustment, patient survival after IRD transplants was significantly higher compared with remaining on the waitlist (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.26‐0.88, P = .018); however, patient (aHR: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.54‐1.59, P = .79) and graft survival (aHR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.70‐1.13, P = .32) were similar between IRD and non‐IRD recipients. We recommend that IRDs be considered for transplant in children.