Acute administration of amitriptyline and mianserin increases dopamine release in the rat nucleus accumbens: possible involvement of serotonin2C receptors

Previous studies of conventional tricyclic and non-tricyclic antidepressants have suggested that a number of these drugs display considerable pharmacological activity at 5-HT2C receptors in the brain. There is evidence that 5-HT2C receptors are involved in the control of the activity of the central dopaminergic system. Therefore, the effects of amitriptyline (5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg i.p.) and of the atypical antidepressant mianserin (2.5 mg/kg and 5 mg/kg i.p.) were studied on the extracellular concentration of dopamine (DA) in the nucleus accumbens of chloral hydrate-anesthetized rats, using intracerebral microdialysis. Amitriptyline and mianserin significantly increased DA release (+31.1 +/- 7.9% and +33.6 +/- 4.3%, respectively) at the higher doses. In addition, lower doses of mianserin (2.5 mg/kg i.p.) and amitriptyline (5 mg/kg i.p.) blocked the inhibitory action of RO 60-0175 (1 mg/kg i.p.), a selective 5-HT2C receptor agonist, on DA release. The effect of RO 60-0175 (1 mg/kg i.p.) was completely blocked by SB 242084 (2.5 mg/kg i.p.), a selective and powerful 5-HT2C receptor antagonist. Taken together, these data indicate that amitriptyline and mianserin increase DA release in the nucleus accumbens by blocking 5-HT2C receptors.     

Cardiovascular effects of paroxetine, a newly developed antidepressant, in anesthetized dogs in comparison with those of imipramine, amitriptyline and clomipramine

The cardiovascular effects of various antidepressant drugs including paroxetine, imipramine, amitriptyline and clomipramine, administered intravenously, have been assessed. Paroxetine, imipramine, amitriptyline or clomipramine potentiated the response to norepinephrine (0.1 microgram/kg, i.v.) on systemic blood pressure, while paroxetine, imipramine and amitriptyline weakened the response to tyramine (30 micrograms/kg, i.v.). A marked decrease in systemic blood pressure was observed after large doses of each drug (3 and 10 mg/kg of paroxetine; 1-10 mg/kg of imipramine, amitriptyline or clomipramine); and half of the animals died following administration of 10 mg/kg of imipramine, amitriptyline or clomipramine. Paroxetine did not show a marked effect on heart rate at a dose of up to 3 mg/kg, although 0.1-3 mg/kg of imipramine, amitriptyline or clomipramine dose-dependently caused tachycardia. ECG disturbances were observed in animals administered 10 mg/kg of imipramine, amitriptyline or clomipramine; but in contrast, 10 mg/kg of paroxetine caused only slight changes in the ECG. Prolongation of atrio-ventricular conduction time was observed with all the drugs. It was concluded that the effects of paroxetine on the canine heart are more mild in comparison with other tricyclic antidepressants used, although its pharmacological features are essentially similar to those of other drugs.     

Do antidepressants affect motivation in conditioned place preference?

The positive motivational effects of a range of antidepressants/neurotransmitter reuptake inhibitor compounds were studied using conditioned place preference. These agents included amitriptyline (2.5-10 mg/kg), venlafaxine (5 and 10 mg/kg), sibutramine (5 and 10 mg/kg), fluoxetine (2.5-10 mg/kg), paroxetine (5-15 mg/kg) and sertraline (2.5-10 mg/kg). Male Wistar rats were place conditioned in a three-compartment box to vehicle or drug alternately for 8 days using a 30-min pretreatment time. Control animals received vehicle only. Cocaine (5 mg/kg) was used as a positive control for the procedure. Significant place preference (P<0.05) was observed with paroxetine (15 mg/kg), fluoxetine (5 and 10 mg/kg), sertraline (2.5-10 mg/kg) and cocaine. Venlafaxine and sibutramine, serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, produced no place conditioning, while the highest dose of the tricyclic antidepressant, amitriptyline (10 mg/kg), produced signs of place aversion. The role of serotonin in reward pathways and differences in serotonin, noradrenaline and dopamine reuptake-inhibiting properties of these compounds may explain why only the serotonin-selective reuptake inhibitors produced place preference in this study.     

Involvement of 5-HT(2C) receptors in the anti-immobility effects of antidepressants in the forced swimming test in mice.

Several recent studies have demonstrated that 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B) and 5-HT(3) receptors were implicated in the mechanism of action of antidepressants in the mouse forced swimming test. Despite extensive evidence for a role of 5-HT(2C) receptors in depression, the precise role of these receptors in the effects of clinically established antidepressants was not directly investigated in the mouse forced swimming test. This work was aimed at exploring interactions between several doses of Ro 60-0175, a recently available, full and selective 5-HT(2C) agonist, and antidepressant drugs in the mouse forced swimming test. Spontaneous locomotor activity was measured as an index of intact sensorimotor functions and the dose-effect of Ro 60-0175 alone, as well as interactions with several antidepressants, such as tricyclic antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine and maprotiline) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (paroxetine, citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and sertraline), were studied in the mouse forced swimming test. There was no intrinsic antidepressant-like effect of Ro 60-0175, but an impairment in locomotor function was detected when using doses higher than 4 mg/kg in the mouse. There was a synergistic effect of low doses of Ro 60-0175 with sub-active doses of imipramine, paroxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine; an antagonism between the highest dose of Ro 60-0175 and the active doses of paroxetine and fluoxetine was also detected. There is evidence that 5-HT(2C) receptors may be involved in the action of antidepressants which are able to boost the concentration of serotonin in the synapse, i.e. SSRIs and imipramine     

Reversal of learned helplessness by selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in rats is not dependent on 5-HT availability

Serotonin (5-HT) and 5-HT(1A) receptors have been suggested to play a pivotal role in the mechanism of action of antidepressant drugs, particularly in the case of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). In the rat learned helplessness (LH) paradigm, a valid animal model of human depression, repeated treatment with the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.125 and 0.5mg/kg) and several classes of antidepressants such as the tricyclic agent desipramine (30 and 60mg/kg), the monoamine oxidase inhibitor (MAOI) pargyline (60mg/kg) and the SSRIs fluoxetine (15 and 30mg/kg), paroxetine (15 and 30mg/kg) and sertraline (30mg/kg) improved behavioural deficit in helpless rats. The involvement of serotonergic mechanisms in the antidepressant-like effect of these agents was investigated using the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY 100,635 and the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor p-chlorophenylalanine (PCPA). Pretreatment with WAY 100,635 blocked the 8-OH-DPAT-induced reduction in escape failures, but did not counteract the antidepressant effect of fluoxetine and paroxetine. PCPA given alone did not modify helpless behaviour nor did it affect the behavioural effect of 8-OH-DPAT, fluoxetine and paroxetine. Adaptive changes in 5-HT(1A) receptor function were studied by measuring 8-OH-DPAT-mediated hypothermia and lower lip retraction (LLR) in the animals 24h after LH test session. Fluoxetine and paroxetine treatments caused a marked reduction in agonist-induced responses, an effect completely prevented by WAY 100,635 and PCPA. In conclusion, whereas direct agonist activity at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors attenuated helpless behaviour, the antidepressant-like effect of SSRIs was found to be independent of their actions on either 5-HT(1A) receptor function or extracellular 5-HT.     

The relationship between pupil diameter and pain by the administration of morphine and antidepressant drugs in mice.

Because the pain sensation is subjective, it is difficult to evaluate the responses to analgesic drugs. Some analgesics that affect the central nervous system are known to change the pupil diameter. The pupil diameter is a more objective criterion that shows the drug effect. We studied the relation between the pupil diameter and analgesia responses to morphine and antidepressants by using the selective micro-receptor agonist morphine (2 and 4 mg/kg), the noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor desipramine (7.5 and 10 mg/kg), the mixed serotonergic and noradrenergic uptake inhibitor and cholinergic receptor antagonist amitriptyline (2.5 and 5 mg/kg), and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) in mice. Both monocular microscopy to assess pupil measurement and the hot-plate test to assess nociceptive thresholds were used in the same animals. We found that morphine played an important role in both mydriasis and analgesia, whereas amitriptyline and desipramine had a greater effect on pupil response than on nociception. Sertraline produced antinociception without causing a change in pupil diameter. As a result, although the pupil response is an important criterion in evaluating the analgesic effect of morphine, it is not possible to put forward the same criterion for the antidepressant drugs. Because different neurotransmitters are involved in pupil and pain mechanisms of antidepressant drugs, it is difficult to evaluate the analgesic response with the pupil diameter.     

Dual monoamine modulation for the antidepressant-like effect of lamotrigine in the modified forced swimming test.

Lamotrigine is an anticonvulsant drug that exhibits a clinical antidepressant effect. However, few studies have been conducted with lamotrigine in animal models of depression and its mechanism of antidepressant action is still unclear. The present study evaluates the effect of lamotrigine (5-20mg/kg, i.p.) in the modified forced swimming test and compare its behavior pattern in the test with those of paroxetine (20mg/kg, i.p.), nortriptyline (20mg/kg, i.p.) and dizolcipine-MK-801 (0.1mg/kg, i.p.). The effect of lamotrigine on locomotor activity and memory was also studied in order to exclude false-positive results. At low doses, lamotrigine (10mg/kg) decreased immobility and increased climbing scores, a similar pattern to nortriptyline. A higher lamotrigine dose (20mg/kg) also increased swimming scores. Lamotrigine neither changed locomotion in the open-field test nor impaired habituation. Paroxetine and dizolcipine decreased immobility and increased swimming. Dizolcipine also decreased climbing. However, although the effects of paroxetine and nortriptyline were seen without effect on locomotor activity, dizolcipine increased locomotor activity. The present study indicates that the antidepressant-like effect of lamotrigine is probably related to noradrenergic/serotonergic systems.     

Lack of interaction between flibanserin and antidepressants in inducing serotonergic syndrome in rats

This study was aimed at evaluating the ability of flibanserin, a 5-HT1A receptor full agonist with antidepressant potential, to induce the 5-HT syndrome (flat body posture, hindlimb abduction and forepaw treading) in rats previously administered with clinically active antidepressants imipramine, fluoxetine or paroxetine. The 5-HT syndrome was observed for 50 min after intraperitoneal administration of flibanserin (0, 8 or 64 mg/kg) given 10 min after antidepressants (0 or 15 mg/kg). Flibanserin induced flat body posture and very slight hindlimb abduction only at 64 mg/kg. No dose of flibanserin elicited forepaw treading. Similar but milder symptoms were induced by antidepressants. No interaction between flibanserin and antidepressants was observed. A dose of 10 mg/kg flibanserin did not change the flat body posture induced by 8 mg/kg (+/-)-8-OH-DPAT but antagonized (+/-)-8-OH-DPAT-induced forepaw treading.     

Effects of selective serotonin and serotonin/noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors on extracellular serotonin in rat diencephalon and frontal cortex

Some clinical reports suggest that tricyclic antidepressants which block both noradrenaline and serotonin (5-HT) reuptake (SNRIs) are more effective than selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in treating severe depression. Moreover, one neurochemical study reported larger increases in extracellular 5-HT in rat frontal cortex in response to the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine compared to the SSRI fluoxetine. However, imipramine, which blocks both 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake, also binds with relatively high affinity to receptors for noradrenaline, histamine and acetylcholine. Thus, to test the hypothesis that compounds that inhibit both 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake produce larger increases in 5-HT efflux, we compared the effects of acute systemic administration of several SNRIs and SSRIs. Extracellular 5-HT was measured using microdialysis probes implanted in the diencephalon and frontal cortex of unanesthetized rats. We tested the SSRIs paroxetine (0.3-10 mg/kg), citalopram (10-20 mg/kg) and fluoxetine (10 mg/kg), the nonselective tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (20 mg/kg) and the more selective SNRIs duloxetine (3-30 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (30-50 mg/kg). During the lights-off period, paroxetine and duloxetine increased 5-HT in the diencephalon approximately 300 and approximately 200%, respectively. During the lights-on period, paroxetine and duloxetine each increased 5-HT approximately 400% in the diencephalon. In the frontal cortex, both paroxetine and duloxetine increased 5-HT approximately 200%. Citalopram and venlafaxine each increased 5-HT in the diencephalon approximately 300%. Fluoxetine and imipramine increased 5-HT in the diencephalon by approximately 125 and approximately 80%, respectively. Thus, these results do not support the hypothesis that compared to SSRIs, compounds which inhibit both 5-HT and noradrenaline reuptake have a larger acute effect on extracellular 5-HT.     

The influence of buspirone, and its metabolite 1-PP, on the activity of paroxetine in the mouse light/dark paradigm and four plates test

Although numerous animal procedures have been employed in the study of antidepressants (ADs) in anxiety, the results following acute administration remain highly variable. The present study investigated the effect of the SSRI paroxetine (4, 8, and 16 mg/kg, IP) in two tests of anxiety in mice: the light/dark test paradigm, and the four plates test (FPT). In both tests, it was found that paroxetine resulted in an anxiolytic-like effect at doses that did not modify motor performance (at the doses of 4 and 8 mg/kg in the light/dark test and at the doses of 4, 8, and 16 mg/kg in the four plates test). In the light/dark paradigm, both doses of buspirone significantly potentiated paroxetine, while in the four plates only one dose of buspirone (a 5HT(1A) partial agonist) (0.06 mg/kg) increased the anxiolytic-like effect of paroxetine. Prior administration of 1-PP was without effect in the light/dark paradigm but antagonized the effect of paroxetine (at the dose of 0.06 and 0. 5 mg/kg) in the FPT. The results suggested that a balance between pre- and postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor was implicated in the anxiolytic-like effect of paroxetine. Buspirone seemed to emphasize the role of paroxetine in 5-HT(1A) receptor modulation and exerted a biphasic influence in the two tests.     

Prolonged treatment with the specific 5-HT-uptake inhibitor citalopram: effect on dopaminergic and serotonergic functions

The effect of prolonged administration of the clinically effective and specific serotonin (5-HT)-uptake-inhibitor, citalopram, has been studied in rats on behavioural measures of dopaminergic (DA) and serotonergic activity and on DA D-2, 5-HT2, alpha 1- and beta-adrenergic receptor number and affinity in vitro. Thirteen days treatment with citalopram in the diet (40 mg/kg/day) did not change receptor binding for either of the ligands studied, although citalopram was detected in high concentrations in brain and plasma and induced a 75% depletion of 5-HT in whole blood. This citalopram dose-regimen was followed by a potentiated hypermotility response to d-amphetamine. Also DA-dependent hypermotility induced by methylphenidate and (+)-3-PPP was increased. In contrast, the 5-HT2-receptor mediated head shake syndrome induced by 1-5-HTP or quipazine was decreased after prolonged citalopram treatment. Two weeks oral bolus treatment (10 mg/kg once or twice daily) with the 5-HT-uptake-inhibitors citalopram, fluoxetine, zimelidine, cyanimipramine or paroxetine induced d-amphetamine potentiation, whereas amitriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine, iprindole, and mianserin treatment showed no effect. It is suggested that d-amphetamine potentiation induced by citalopram is mainly dependent on DA mechanisms, and that this profile is characteristic for preferential 5-HT-uptake-inhibitors. The lack of correlation between behavioural effect and receptor changes was important. Since citalopram has been shown to have clinical antidepressant activity, it is concluded that down-regulation of beta-adrenoceptors is not a prerequisite for antidepressant action.     

Effects of acute and chronic tianeptine administration on serotonin outflow in rats: comparison with paroxetine by using in vivo microdialysis

Using in vivo microdialysis, we compared the effects of tianeptine (an antidepressant drug which, in marked contrast with other antidepressants, is thought to increase the uptake of serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) on extracellular 5-HT concentrations ([5-HT](ext)) in the frontal cortex and raphe nuclei of freely moving rats with those of paroxetine, a potent selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor. A single paroxetine dose (1 mg/kg, i.p.) increased [5-HT](ext) over baseline in the frontal cortex and raphe nuclei, respectively. A single administration of tianeptine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) did not change [5-HT(ext)] in the two brain regions studied. Repeated exposure to paroxetine (0.5 mg/kg) b.i.d. for 14 days induced a sixfold significant increase in basal [5-HT](ext) in the raphe nuclei. Administration of tianeptine (5 mg/kg) b.i.d. for 14 days did not affect 5-HT baseline concentrations. In rats chronically treated with either paroxetine or tianeptine, drug challenge did not alter area under the curve values. Thus, our in vivo data indicate that tianeptine and paroxetine do not exert a similar in vivo effect on the serotonergic system in rat brain.     

Inhibition of 5-HT cell firing in the DRN by non-selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors: studies on the role of 5-HT1A autoreceptors and noradrenergic mechanisms

Improved clinical antidepressant efficacy may result if the acute inhibition of 5-HT cell firing induced by antidepressants is prevented. Here we examined whether inhibition of 5-HT cell firing by non-selective 5-HT uptake inhibiting antidepressant drugs is reversed by a selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist. In addition, we examined whether concomitant blockade of NA uptake offsets the inhibition of 5-HT cell firing resulting from 5-HT uptake blockade. Antidepressants which block 5-HT uptake (paroxetine, clomipramine, amitriptyline, venlafaxine), all caused dose-dependent and complete inhibition of 5-HT cell firing. Desipramine, a selective NA uptake blocker, caused a slight reduction in firing. The selective 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, reversed the inhibition of 5-HT cell firing induced by clomipramine, amitriptyline, venlafaxine, and paroxetine, but not that induced by the α₁ adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin. Desipramine, at a dose which increased extracellular NA in the DRN, reversed the effect of prazosin but did not alter the ability of paroxetine to inhibit 5-HT cell firing. Our data indicate that antidepressant drugs with 5-HT uptake blocking properties inhibit 5-HT cell firing via activation of 5-HT_1A autoreceptors, and do so irrespective of their effects on NA uptake. These data are discussed in relation to the application of 5-HT_1A receptor antagonists to enhance the clinical efficacy of antidepressant drugs. Received: 15 July 1996 / Final version: 11 November 1996     

Effects of dexfenfluramine on dopamine dependent behaviours in rats

5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) inhibits the synthesis and release of dopamine (DA) from rat nigrostriatal DAergic neurons. Dexfenfluramine releases 5-HT from brain 5-HTergic neurons. The present study was undertaken to determine whether dexfenfluramine, through the released 5-HT, modulates the intensity of the behaviours dependent on the functional status of the nigrostriatal DAergic system. The effect of pretreatment with dexfenfluramine on dexamphetamine and apomorphine stereotypies of the oral movement variety and on catalepsy induced by haloperidol and small doses (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg ip) of apomorphine was studied in rats. We also investigated whether dexfenfluramine induces catalepsy in rats. Dexfenfluramine at 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg ip did not induce catalepsy and did not antagonise apomorphine stereotypy. However, 1 h pretreatment with 5-HT releasing doses of dexfenfluramine ie 5 and 10 mg/kg ip, antagonized dexamphetamine stereotypy and potentiated catalepsy induced by haloperidol and small doses of apomorphine. Our results, that dexfenfluramine at 2.5, 5 and 10 mg/kg ip neither induced catalepsy nor antagonised apomorphine stereotypy, indicate that dexfenfluramine at these doses does not block the postsynaptic striatal D2 and D1 DA receptors. They also indicate that the 5-HT released by 5 and 10 mg/kg dexfenfluramine does not exert an inhibitory effect at or beyond the postsynaptic striatal D2 and D1 DA receptor sites. However, 5 and 10 mg/kg doses of dexfenfluramine, through the released 5-HT, inhibit the synthesis and release of DA from the nigrostriatal DAergic neurons and thus antagonise dexamphetamine stereotypy and potentiate catalepsy induced by haloperidol and small doses of apomorphine.     

Differential modulation of efficiency in a food-rewarded "differential reinforcement of low-rate" 72-s schedule in rats by norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors

RATIONALE: The differential reinforcement of low-rate 72-s (DRL 72-s) schedule, in which rats must withhold a response for at least 72 s to obtain a reward (generally water), is an attractive procedure for the characterisation of potential antidepressant agents. Indeed, several antidepressants have been shown to improve efficiency (ratio of reinforcement rate to response rate) in this model, either by decreasing response rates and/or by increasing reinforcement rates. OBJECTIVE: Herein, we compared the actions of antidepressants known to inhibit serotonin (5-HT), norepinephrine (NE) and/or dopamine (DA) reuptake in a food-rewarded DRL 72-s schedule. METHODS: Rats trained in a food-rewarded DRL 72-s schedule and showing stable baseline performance were administered with drugs i.p. once a week. In independent experiments, the influence of drugs on food intake, spontaneous locomotor activity and extracellular levels of monoamines in the frontal cortex was evaluated. RESULTS: In confirmation of previous studies, the tricyclic agent imipramine (10.0 mg/kg) and the "atypical" agent mianserin (40.0 mg/kg) significantly increased efficiency. In analogy, the selective NE reuptake inhibitors (NARIs) desipramine (20.0 mg/kg), nortriptyline (2.5 mg/kg) and reboxetine (0.63 mg/kg) all displayed marked enhancements in efficiency. In contrast, the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) citalopram (10.0 mg/kg), fluvoxamine (10.0 mg/kg) and paroxetine (10.0 mg/kg) all significantly decreased efficiency. The mixed 5-HT/NE reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) venlafaxine (2.5 mg/kg, 10.0 mg/kg) and S33005 (0.16-10.0 mg/kg), likewise, did not increase efficiency. Further, the DA reuptake inhibitors (DARIs) bupropion (0.16-10.0 mg/kg) and GBR12935 (0.63-10.0 mg/kg) had no effect on DRL 72-s performance. All drug classes exerted a similar, mild inhibitory influence on food intake and locomotor behaviour. Imipramine, mianserin and NARIs markedly increased extracellular levels of NE, and SSRIs elevated levels of 5-HT, while SSRIs augmented levels of both. CONCLUSIONS: The present experimental procedure demonstrates, in analogy to imipramine and mianserin, robust and consistent increases in efficiency with NARIs. Their effects may be distinguished from a decrease in efficiency elicited by SSRIs, and a lack of activity of SNRIs and DARIs. While the reasons underlying the ineffectiveness of SSRIs (in contrast to previous studies) remain to be clarified, these data underline the importance of adrenergic mechanisms in the control of behaviour under conditions of delayed responding. Further, they support the interest of DRL 72-s procedures for the characterisation of diverse classes of antidepressant agent.     

Antidepressant-like effects in various mice strains in the forced swimming test

Rationale. Strain differences in mice have been reported in response to drugs in the mouse forced swimming test (FST), even if few antidepressants were examined. Objectives. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of genetic factors, using five antidepressants (imipramine, desipramine, citalopram, paroxetine and bupropion) in the mouse FST, in outbred strains (Swiss, NMRI) and inbred strains (DBA/2, C57BL/6J Rj). Moreover, whole brain levels of dopamine (DA), noradrenaline (NA), serotonin (5-HT) in vehicle treated animals, which were or were not subjected to the FST, were measured by HPLC analysis in an attempt to explain behavioural differences. Methods. For each antidepressant, a dose range (1–16 mg/kg) was tested in the locomotor apparatus and only non-psychostimulant doses were then tested in the FST in order to detect antidepressant-like activity. Results. No baseline differences among Swiss, NMRI, DBA/2 and C57BL/6J Rj strains were observed in our experiments, allowing the comparison of different antidepressants in each strain. Imipramine (16 mg/kg), desipramine, citalopram (4–16 mg/kg) and paroxetine (8 and 16 mg/kg) treatment decreased the immobility time in the Swiss strain and the size of the effect reached more than 20% for each of these antidepressants. C57BL/6J Rj was the only strain sensitive to bupropion (2 and 4 mg/kg). In the NMRI strain, only paroxetine treatment decreased the immobility time (16 mg/kg). Conclusion. Our study showed that drug sensitivity is genotype dependent. FST results have shown that Swiss mice are the most sensitive strain to detect 5-HT and/or NA treatment. The use of DBA/2 inbred mice may be limited, as an absence of antidepressant-like response was observed in the FST. The lack of sensitivity to antidepressant treatment in DBA/2 strains could be due to high DA, NA and 5-HT whole brain concentrations. Electronic Publication     

Comparison of the effects of antidepressants on norepinephrine and serotonin concentrations in the rat frontal cortex: an in-vivo microdialysis study

The present study employed in-vivo microdialysis techniques in the freely moving rat to systematically compare the neurochemical effects of various antidepressant agents on extracellular concentrations of norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5-HT) in the frontal cortex. We found that acute administration of the tricyclic antidepressant, desipramine (3-30 mg/kg, s.c.) and the dual serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, venlafaxine (3-30 mg/kg, s.c.), produced dose-dependent and robust increases in cortical NE concentrations (498% and 403%, respectively). Conversely, acute injection of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine (30 mg/kg, s.c.) and paroxetine (1-10 mg/kg, s.c.), did not alter forebrain NE concentrations. However, paroxetine did produce a significant increase in cortical NE concentrations (164%) when administered at 30 mg/kg. These changes in NE were not paralleled by 5-HT, which showed no increase following administration of desipramine, venlafaxine, paroxetine or fluoxetine. Combination treatment with the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635 (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.), significantly enhanced extracellular 5-HT concentrations following venlafaxine (10 and 30 mg/kg), fluoxetine (30 mg/kg) and paroxetine (3-30 mg/kg). Alternatively, WAY-100635 produced no augmentation of the antidepressant-induced changes in extracellular NE. Collectively, these studies show that paroxetine, at low to intermediate doses, and fluoxetine are selective for 5-HT versus NE systems, whereas venlafaxine produces similar effects on both 5-HT and NE levels at the effective doses tested.     

Increased tonic activation of rat forebrain 5-HT(1A) receptors by lithium addition to antidepressant treatments.

The present study was undertaken to determine whether lithium addition to long-term treatment with different classes of antidepressant drugs could induce a greater effect on the serotonin (5-HT) system than the drugs given alone. Because 5-HT(1A) receptor activation hyperpolarizes and inhibits the firing activity of CA(3) pyramidal neurons in the dorsal hippocampus, the degree of disinhibition produced by the selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY 100635 was determined using in vivo extracellular recordings. In controls, as well as in rats receiving a lithium diet for 3 days, the administration of WAY 100635 (25-100 microg/kg, IV) did not modify the firing activity of dorsal hippocampus CA(3) pyramidal neurons. When the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (10 mg/kg/day, SC), the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine (2.5 mg/kg/day, SC) and the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor paroxetine (10 mg/kg/day, SC) were administered alone for 21 days, a dose of 50 microg/kg of WAY 100635 was needed to increase significantly the firing activity of these neurons. On the other hand, WAY 100635, at a dose of only 25 microg/kg, increased significantly the firing rate of CA(3) pyramidal neurons in rats receiving both a long-term antidepressant treatment and a short-term lithium diet. It is concluded that the addition of lithium to antidepressant treatments produced a greater disinhibition of dorsal hippocampus CA(3) pyramidal neurons than any treatments given alone. The present results support the notion that the addition of lithium to antidepressants may produce a therapeutic response in treatment-resistant depression by enhancing 5-HT neurotransmission.     

Depression and poor sleep: the effect of monoaminergic antidepressants in a pre-clinical model in rats

The effects of five antidepressants (escitalopram, paroxetine, duloxetine, venlafaxine, and reboxetine) on the sleep architecture were investigated in freely moving rats in the light phase of a 12:12 h light:dark cycle following a single i.p. dose of antidepressant. Overall, paroxetine and escitalopram exhibited the least sleep disruptive profiles, whereas duloxetine, venlafaxine, and reboxetine increased the time spent awake and suppressed paradoxical sleep. Analysis of the EEG at 1 h intervals revealed only subtle differences from the overall picture. The effect of venlafaxine on disruption of sleep architecture could not be readily explained by its in vitro serotonin (5-HT) and noradrenaline (NA) reuptake inhibitory potencies. In vivo microdialysis experiments in the ventral hippocampus of freely moving rats revealed that venlafaxine affected the 5-HT and NA systems equally at the doses tested. Duloxetine (7.7 mg/kg) induced maximal blockade of the 5-HT transporter and duloxetine 7.7 mg/kg also modulated the noradrenaline system. Thus, in this animal model, the enhancement of noradrenergic activity is more disruptive on the sleep architecture than enhancement of serotonergic activity.