Antiarrhythmic drug efficacy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease as assessed by electrophysiologic studies

The efficacy and proarrhythmic potential of antiarrhythmic agents were evaluated. Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed in 160 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease during a baseline study and 432 subsequent drug studies. The tachyarrhythmlas induced during baseline studies were sustained ventricular tachycardia (121 patients), ventricular fibrillation (16 patients), and symptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (23 patients). Regimens were completely successful if fewer than 6 repetitive ventricular responses were inducible during therapy and partially successful if no more than 15 repetitive ventricular responses were inducible. Procainamide and quinidine were the most successful single agents, with overall success rates of 24% and 35%, respectively. Either procainamide or quinidine combined with mexiletine was the most successful combination (overall success of 23% ). Each antiarrhythmic regimen showed a proarrhythmic potential. The incidence of proarrhythmic effects ranged from 4 to 13%, with no significant difference between regimens. In 13% of patients at least 1 regimen produced a proarrhythmic effect. Patients treated with an antiarrhythmic regimen that prevented induction of arrhythmia had significantly fewer arrhythmia recurrences than patients treated with a regimen that failed to prevent it. In conclusion, identification of an effective drug regimen is possible in 38% of patients with lethal ventricular arrhythmias, proarrhythmic effects occur in a significant number of patients during electrophysiologic testing of antiarrhythmic regimens, and the clinical outcome in patients in whom ventricular arrhythmias are not inducible with ventricular stimulation have a better prognosis than those in whom arrhythmias continue to be inducible on therapy.     

Prediction of response to class I antiarrhythmic drugs during electrophysiologic study of ventricular tachycardia

We have retrospectively examined data from 41 patients studied in our laboratory for symptomatic ventricular arrhythmia in order to test whether any clinical or electrophysiologic variables could be identified which would predict the patient's response to class I antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients had (1) clinically documented paroxysmal sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation remote from acute myocardial infarction, (2) inducible sustained VT during control electrophysiologic study (EPS), and (3) EPS after one or more of the following class I antiarrhythmic drugs: intravenous procainamide (36 patients), oral quinidine (30 patients), and oral disopyramide (36 patients). Initially, patients were divided into those who had noninducible or only nonsustained VT after any of the tested drugs (responders), and those who continued to have inducible sustained VT after all tested drugs (nonresponders). A logistic regression technique demonstrated no independent contribution to drug response by any of the following variables: sex, arteriosclerotic heart disease, cardiomegaly, age, time since the initial episode of VT, and cycle length of VT during control study. The number of antiarrhythmic drugs the patient had received prior to study was found to be a significant independent contributor (p < 0.03), with responders having received an average of 2.5 drugs compared with 4.2 for nonresponders. In addition to the logistic regression, 12 other clinical and electrophysiologic variables were not predictors of drug response. The question was also asked, “Does response or nonresponse to one class I drug predict response or nonresponse to the others?” Significant concordance of response and nonresponse was demonstrated for procainamide and quinidine, but not for either of these drugs and disopyramide. Drug therapy for inducible sustained VT therefore remains empiric.     

Electrophysiologic and clinical factors influencing response to class IA antiarrhythmic agents in patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia

Clinical and electrophysiologic data from 51 consecutive patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia inducible during programmed ventricular stimulation were evaluated to determine what variables predict the response to intravenous class IA antiarrhythmic agents. All patients received acute drug testing in the electrophysiologic laboratory with either intravenous procainamide or intravenous quinidine. Ventricular tachycardia suppression was achieved in 9 out of 51 patients (18%). The age, gender, left ventricular ejection fraction, baseline right ventricular effective refractory period, baseline HV interval, and baseline ventricular tachycardia cycle length were not predictive of ventricular tachycardia suppression with intravenous procainamide or quinidine during programmed ventricular stimulation. The degree of prolongation of the right ventricular effective refractory period after drug administration did not predict success or failure to suppress inducible ventricular tachycardia. The degree of prolongation of the HV interval was also not predictive. In addition, the degree of prolongation of the right ventricular effective refractory period or the HV interval did not predict the change in the ventricular tachycardia cycle length after drug administration in patients who remained inducible. These data indicate that the response to class IA antiarrhythmic agents in patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia cannot be predicted on the basis of various clinical and electrophysiologic parameters.     

Usefulness of the electrophysiology laboratory for evaluation of proarrhythmic drug response in coronary artery disease.

Two potential manifestations of proarrhythmic responses to type IA antiarrhythmic agents in the electrophysiology laboratory were evaluated in 122 patients with chronic coronary artery disease and previous myocardial infarction: (1) conversion of uniform nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) into sustained VT after drug administration, and (2) induction of sustained VT by fewer extrastimuli after drug administration. Forty-two patients were evaluated for nonsustained VT. Eighty patients were evaluated for sustained VT: 30 of these had spontaneous sustained VT only while receiving empiric therapy with quinidine or procainamide, whereas the remaining 50 developed spontaneous VT in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. All patients underwent programmed stimulation in the baseline state and after procainamide. Four patients had conversion of induced uniform nonsustained VT into the same morphology, but sustained VT after procainamide administration. These responses only occurred in patients evaluated for nonsustained VT. Over 90% of patients presenting with sustained VT had uniform sustained VT induced at the baseline study and after procainamide, regardless of whether the spontaneous arrhythmia occurred only in the presence or absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. There was no significant difference in the change in mode of induction from baseline to procainamide study, regardless of whether patients had developed spontaneous VT only in the presence or absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. One patient with no inducible VT at the baseline study had inducible uniform sustained VT after procainamide administration, and 1 patient with inducible VT at baseline developed spontaneous sustained uniform VT after procainamide administration. Both patients had developed spontaneous sustained VT only while receiving therapy with type IA agents.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Long-term reproducibility and significance of provokable ventricular arrhythmias after myocardial infarction

The long-term reproducibility and significance of inducible ventricular arrhythmias were assessed in 21 survivors of a myocardial infarction. Programmed ventricular stimulation performed a mean of 12 +/- 2 days (range 8 to 18) after infarction provoked ventricular fibrillation in 2 patients, sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 8 and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 11. Patients were restudied using the same protocol a mean of 8 +/- 2 months (range 4 to 11) after infarction. All patients underwent programmed ventricular stimulation studies in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug treatment. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias could be reinitiated in 16 patients (76%): ventricular fibrillation in 2, sustained ventricular tachycardia in 5 (monomorphic in 4) and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 9. A preponderance of inferior infarction was observed among patients with reinducible tachycardias (9 of 16 patients versus 0 of 5 with noninducible tachycardias) (p less than 0.05). No significant difference existed between patients with and without reinducible arrhythmias with respect to severity of coronary artery disease, degree of left ventricular dysfunction, occurrence of ventricular fibrillation in the acute phase of infarction and ventricular arrhythmias detected by 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring. There was no significant difference between patients with and without a positive late study in stimulation thresholds, ventricular refractory periods, time interval between initial and repeat testing and use of beta-adrenergic blocking agents. During a mean follow-up period of 17 months (range 10 to 23) one patient with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia at both studies died suddenly. The remaining patients have survived follow-up without experiencing an arrhythmic event.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Predictors of inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease

To determine predictors of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation by programmed electrical stimulation in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, 14 clinical and angiographic variables were analyzed in 60 consecutive patients. All patients had angiographically documented coronary artery disease and symptomatic ventricular arrhythmias (sustained ventricular tachycardia in 21, ventricular fibrillation in 21 and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 18). Baseline programmed electrical stimulation while the patient was not taking antiarrhythmic drugs was performed with use of single, double and triple extrastimuli and burst pacing from two right ventricular sites. The variables analyzed were presenting arrhythmia; presence, frequency and complexity of ventricular ectopic activity on baseline 24 h electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring; greater than or equal to 70% narrowing in either the left anterior descending, proximal left anterior descending, right coronary or circumflex coronary artery (independently assessed); single, double or triple vessel coronary disease; anterior, apical or inferior wall motion abnormalities; segmental dyskinesia and ejection fraction. Thirty-seven patients (62%) had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (rate greater than 100 beats/min, duration greater than 30 s or requiring cardioversion) and two patients (3%) had ventricular fibrillation induced. Eleven patients (18%) had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (duration greater than or equal to 3 beats, less than 30 s) induced and 10 patients (17%) had no inducible arrhythmia (duration less than 3 beats). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis identified three independent variables predictive of inducible sustained ventricular arrhythmias: sustained ventricular tachycardia as the presenting arrhythmia (p = 0.004), proximal left anterior descending artery lesion (p = 0.002) and anterior wall motion abnormality (p = 0.005).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Antiarrhythmic Efficacy of Oral Sotalol in Patients with Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia or Ventricular Fibrillation Postmyocardial Infarction

In order to assess the antiarrhythmic efficacy of oral sotalol we studied 46 patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 40) or ventricular fibrillation (n = 6) by programmed ventricular stimulation. All patients had coronary artery disease with a history of myocardial infarction. Prior to sotalol, patients were treated with a mean of 3.4 ± 1.4 antiarrhythmic Class I drugs. None of these drugs prevented sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation. During control programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS 1) ventricular fibrillation was induced in 7 patients (15%), sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia in 30 patients (65%), and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 9 patients (20%). After loading with oral sotalol (320 mg/day) programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS 2) was repeated 4.2 ± 3.3 weeks after PVS 1. Ventricular fibrillation was not inducible in any of the patients; in 10 patients (22%) sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced, and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was induced in 10 patients (22%). In 26 patients (57%) either no response or a short ventricular response was inducible. Our data show that oral sotalol is an effective antiarrhythmic agent in patients with sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation following myocardial infarction.     

Use of electrophysiologic testing in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia: prognostic and therapeutic implications

Forty patients with coronary artery disease and nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring underwent programmed electrical stimulation. In 22 patients, monomorphic ventricular tachycardia was induced at baseline drug-free electrophysiologic testing; 9 of these patients subsequently developed a clinical sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. In 18 patients, no tachycardia could be induced, and none of these 18 had subsequent tachycardia. In 25 of the 40 patients, arrhythmia management was guided by the results of electrophysiologic testing; this group included 11 patients who received antiarrhythmic therapy for induced ventricular tachycardia and 14 patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia who did not receive antiarrhythmic therapy. In the remaining 15 patients, arrhythmia management was not based on the results of electrophysiologic testing. Only two episodes of clinical sustained tachyarrhythmia occurred in the group receiving electrophysiologically guided therapy compared with seven episodes in the group treated without electrophysiologic guidance (p less than 0.01). Thus, in patients with coronary artery disease with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory electrocardiography, electrophysiologic testing can identify those at high and low risk for subsequent clinical tachycardia events. Furthermore, results of such testing can be used to optimize arrhythmia management in these patients.     

Inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia refractory to individual class I drugs: effect of adding a second class I drug

As class I drugs often fail to control ventricular tachycardia when used individually, two such drugs may be combined in an attempt to increase efficacy. The effect of combinations of class I drugs was tested in nine patients undergoing electrophysiologic study for documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, in whom single class I drugs failed to prevent the induction of sustained ventricular tachycardia. By study design, all patients had inducible ventricular tachycardia during the control study, after receiving intravenous procainamide, 1306 ± 243 mg alone, oral quinidine, 1600 ± 0 mg alone, and in five patients, oral disopyramide, 1200 ± 0 mg alone. After oral quinidine and (on a subsequent day) oral disopyramide were found to be ineffective, intravenous procainamide was added and the study was repeated. All patients continued to have inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia despite the addition of procainamide. All showed an increase in tachycardia cycle length; quinidine alone vs qunidine plus procainamide, 351 ± 61 vs 499 ± 65 msec, p < 0.0005; disopyramide alone vs disopyramide plus procainamide, 405 ± 41 vs 494 ± 31 msec, p < 0.005. Also, induction of tachycardia was easier on the combination in 9 of 13 tests where this could be assessed (five of eight patients on quinidine plus procainamide and four of five patients on disopyramide plus procainamide). In conclusion, although induced ventricular tachycardia was slower on two class I drugs and therefore might be better tolerated, in no patient did the combination prevent induction of sustained tachycardia. Easier induction suggests that spontaneous episodes might become more frequent. Therefore such combinations cannot be expected to provide effective prophylaxis in patients refractory to large doses of individual class I drugs.     

Limitations of failure of procainamide during electrophysiologic testing to predict response to other medical therapy

To determine whether failure of procainamide to prevent initiation of ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing predicted failure of other antiarrhythmic regimens, 81 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease whose ventricular tachyarrhythmias remained inducible during procainamide administration were studied. Overall, 26 (12%) of 216 subsequent drug studies were successful and at least one effective drug regimen was identified in 22 (27%) of the 81 patients. Drug success was significantly related to the arrhythmia induced at baseline study; 7% of drug studies were successful in patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 24% in patients with ventricular fibrillation, and 29% in patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. An effective drug regimen was found in 11 (19%) of 59 patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 4 (50%) of 8 patients with ventricular fibrillation and 7 (50%) of 14 patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. In patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, failure of procainamide to suppress the arrhythmia correlated with failure of other agents used singly but not in combination. This study supports the view that when procainamide fails to prevent initiation of the arrhythmia in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia it is unlikely that other individual standard agents will be effective. However, combination regimens may suppress the arrhythmia and should be evaluated. In patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, all agents should be evaluated because failure to respond to procainamide does not predict subsequent responses to other agents either alone or in combination.     

Programmed ventricular stimulation in mitral valve prolapse: analysis of 36 patients

Programmed ventricular stimulation with 3 extrastimuli was performed in 36 patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP). Among 11 patients without transient cerebral symptoms, none had inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF), whether or not nonsustained VT or ventricular premature complexes (VPC) were present during ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings. These patients remained well without antiarrhythmic drug therapy for 6 to 57 months (mean 23) of follow-up. Two patients with recurrent unexplained syncope and no documented ventricular arrhythmia during electrocardiographic monitoring also had no inducible VT or VF. Among 20 patients with syncope or presyncope and documented nonsustained VT or VPCs during electrocardiographic monitoring, polymorphic nonsustained VT was induced in 8, sustained unimorphic VT in 2, and VF in 3. In 1 patient who had inducible polymorphic nonsustained VT, electrocardiographic monitoring during syncope showed sinus rhythm. Among 3 patients with a history of sustained VT or VF, unimorphic VT was induced in each. Patients with MVP who have asymptomatic ventricular ectopic activity and no inducible VT may have a benign prognosis without treatment. In patients who have transient cerebral symptoms and documented nonsustained VT or VPCs, VT or VF is inducible in 65%, most often polymorphic VT. It is unclear in which patients this finding is clinically significant and in which it is a nonspecific response to programmed stimulation.     

Spontaneous arrhythmia detected on ambulatory electrocardiographic recording lacks precision in predicting inducibility of ventricular tachycardia during electrophysiologic study

This study investigates the relation of spontaneous ventricular arrhythmia on ambulatory electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring to the subsequent inducibility of ventricular tachycardia during programmed electrical stimulation. Eighty patients (65 men, 15 women), whose mean age was 58 years, presented with one of the following: sustained ventricular tachycardia (n = 54); sudden death requiring resuscitation (n = 4); ventricular fibrillation (n = 11); or syncope thought to be of cardiac origin (n = 11). All patients had 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiograms and programmed electrical stimulation while receiving no antiarrhythmic therapy. Programmed electrical stimulation resulted in inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia (defined as a rate of greater than or equal to 120 beats/min for greater than or equal to 1 minute or requiring intervention) in 53 of the 80 patients. There was no measure of frequency or complexity of spontaneous arrhythmia detected on ambulatory ECG that could identify the degree of subsequent ventricular tachycardia inducibility during programmed electrical stimulation. In fact, 25% of patients who had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia had little or no spontaneous arrhythmia on ambulatory ECG. Furthermore, of the 53 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia, 28 and 55% had no couplets or nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, respectively, during ambulatory monitoring. The combination of a clinical presentation of sustained ventricular tachycardia, confirmed coronary artery disease and a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 30% had a better positive predictive value than did any ambulatory ECG criterion in predicting the inducibility of sustained ventricular tachycardia.     

Electrophysiologic and antiarrhythmic efficacy of oral sotalol for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias: evaluation by programmed stimulation and ambulatory electrocardiogram

Programmed ventricular stimulation and ambulatory electrocardiography were performed both before and during oral sotalol therapy in 39 patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmia inducible by programmed stimulation (sustained ventricular tachycardia [n = 31], ventricular fibrillation [n = 3], nonsustained ventricular tachycardia [n = 5]). Oral sotalol was started at 80 mg twice daily and the dose thereafter was then gradually increased until a mean daily dose of 300 mg (range 160-480) was reached. In 12 of 34 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation the arrhythmia was suppressed; in 19 patients it was not and in 3 the spontaneous arrhythmia recurred. Reproducibly inducible nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was suppressed by sotalol in all five patients with this arrhythmia. Thus, a favorable electrophysiologic response was obtained in 17 (44%) of 39 patients. Arrhythmia suppression correlated with the type of arrhythmia (unsustained or sustained) induced during the control period (p less than 0.05), and nonresponders had a higher incidence of previously ineffective drug trials (p less than 0.05). In 22 patients treated long term with sotalol suppression of arrhythmia inducibility on programmed stimulation predicted freedom from recurrences (16 of 17), whereas continued inducibility indicated drug failure (5 of 5) (p less than 0.005). Serial ambulatory electrocardiograms performed in 37 of the 39 patients did not correlate with the results of electrophysiologic testing. For the patients on long-term treatment, invasive testing was superior to electrocardiographic monitoring in predicting outcome. These data indicate that in daily doses of 160 to 480 mg oral sotalol is a very useful agent in patients presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation, and its efficacy is fairly well predicted by programmed stimulation.     

Day-to-day reproducibility of antiarrhythmic drug trials using programmed extrastimulus techniques for ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary artery disease

Forty-nine patients with coronary artery disease and documented clinical sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) were studied twice in the drug-free state and twice during treatment with an identical antiarrhythmic medication at therapeutic plasma concentrations using an identical programmed electrical stimulation protocol. Tested drugs included procainamide, quinidine, disopyramide and phenytoin. During their 2 paired tests, 11 patients had nearly identical therapeutic plasma concentrations of antiarrhythmic agents (group I) and 38 patients had therapeutic plasma concentrations, but with more variation in drug levels between otherwise identical paired drug tests (group II). Overall, 71% of patients had inducible sustained VT or VF during drug testing. Induced ventricular arrhythmias were not reproducible in 45% of group I patients, despite restudy at nearly identical therapeutic plasma concentrations of an identical antiarrhythmic agent. Induced arrhythmias were also not reproducible in 16% of group II patients. This variability could not be attributed to the electrophysiologic characteristics of the patients studied. Drug trials directed by programmed stimulation should be cautiously interpreted because time-associated changes can mimic a change attributed to a beneficial or deleterious drug effect.     

Long-term tocainide therapy for ventricular arrhythmias

Long-term tocainide therapy has been evaluated in 17 patients with ventricular arrhythmias. Ventricular tachycardia and/or fibrillation was recurrent and sustained in nine patients, and symptomatic but unsustained in three others. Five patients had frequent but only mildly symptomatic ventricular irritability. In all patients, arrhythmias could not be managed with quinidine, procainamide or propranolol. Tocainide doses ranged from 300 to 700 mg every 8 hours (mean steady-state plasma concentrations ranged from 5.75 to 12.18 microgram/ml). Tocainide therapy was unsuccessful in eight patients; three died during therapy and five had no antiarrhythmic response. The data suggest that evaluation of long-term drug efficacy, using the criterion of reduction of asymptomatic arrhythmias, is best documented by multiple sequential ambulatory electrocardiographic recordings, both on and off the drug. Tocainide controlled arrhythmias in nine patients (53%), with criteria of success being continued reduction of ectopic beats and/or control of symptomatic recurrences. Seven patients remain on therapy. Side effects generally have been minor and well-tolerated.     

Electrophysiologic testing in patients at high risk for sudden cardiac death. I. Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and abnormal ventricular function

Nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, although usually asymptomatic, is associated with a high risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with depressed left ventricular function. To test the vulnerability of such patients to symptomatic and potentially life-threatening arrhythmias, complete electrophysiologic studies were performed in 58 patients with clinically documented nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (greater than or equal to three complexes but less than 15 seconds of self-terminating ventricular tachycardia by 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic [Holter] or telemetric monitoring) and abnormal left ventricular function (ejection fraction less than 50% by radionuclide angiography). All patients had nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs, acute ischemia, long QT syndrome, recent infarction or electrolyte abnormalities. The stimulation protocol for each patient included the introduction of single, double and triple ventricular extrastimuli at three cycle lengths (sinus, 600 and 450 ms) and two right ventricular sites (apex and outflow tract). A sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia was induced in 23 patients (40%) and a nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 14 patients (24%). Induction of sustained tachycardia correlated with the presence of akinesia or aneurysm, or both, by radionuclide angiography, but not with ejection fraction or presence or absence of coronary artery disease. These results indicate that: 1) patients with clinical nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and chronic left ventricular dysfunction have a high incidence of inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation; and 2) electrophysiologic testing may allow further substratification of risk of sudden cardiac death in high risk patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.     

Importance of programmed ventricular stimulation in patients with ventricular salvos

The yield of programmed ventricular stimulation in asymptomatic patients with documented ventricular salvoes is not definitely known. Therefore, we retrospectively evaluated the data of 57 patients in whom ventricular salvoes had been observed, either during resting ECG or 24-hour ECG monitoring, and who had been studied using programmed ventricular stimulation. Of these patients, 63% were male, with a mean age of 49 years. 28% had coronary artery disease, 21% dilated cardiomyopathy, 16% mitral valve prolapse, 9% hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, 9% valvular heart disease and 14% had no structural heart disease. Using a maximum of two premature ventricular extrastimuli during programmed ventricular stimulation, sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation was induced in nine patients (16%). In 30 patients (53%) nonsustained ventricular tachycardia was induced (3-35 ventricular echo beats), in 18 patients only one to two ventricular echo beats could be induced. In 8/16 patients (50%) with coronary artery disease, sustained ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation could be induced. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction did not differ between patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia and those with inducible non-sustained ventricular tachycardia or those with a normal result during programmed ventricular stimulation. 33 patients were treated with antiarrhythmic drugs; the efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy was either controlled by "serial electrophysiologic testing" in four patients, or by repeated 24-hour long-term ECG in 29 patients. During a mean follow-up period of 31 +/- 24 months five patients died, two of them suddenly. None of the remaining patients had experienced a symptomatic sustained ventricular tachycardia or a syncope.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Amiloride. Antiarrhythmic and electrophysiologic actions in patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia

This study assessed the antiarrhythmic activity of amiloride in 35 patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia. Patients had failed to respond to 3.6 +/- 1.0 antiarrhythmic drugs. Ventricular tachycardia was reproducibly induced by programmed electrical stimulation in all patients at the baseline study. Amiloride was given at 10 and 20 mg/day p.o. on a twice-daily schedule that achieved serum concentrations of 21 +/- 17 and 36 +/- 18 ng/ml, respectively. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was unchanged from 36 +/- 14% at baseline to 37 +/- 17% during amiloride treatment. Amiloride significantly increased serum potassium from 4.6 +/- 0.4 to 5.1 +/- 0.4 mM. Four patients failed amiloride therapy with spontaneous nonsustained ventricular tachycardia. The remaining 31 patients were assessed by repeat programmed stimulation. Six patients had complete antiarrhythmic response, and an additional six patients had less than 15 beats of ventricular tachycardia induced. Therefore, amiloride was an efficacious antiarrhythmic treatment in 12 of 35 (34%) patients. Amiloride concentrations were significantly higher (52 +/- 20 ng/ml) in patients that responded than in patients that did not respond (30 +/- 15 ng/ml). The only electrophysiologic measurement that changed significantly was the ventricular functional refractory period (from 269 +/- 24 to 283 +/- 25 msec, p less than 0.05). Amiloride also suppressed frequent, spontaneous ventricular premature beats in eight of 15 patients (53%). No somatic side effects occurred. Two of the five patients discharged on amiloride therapy developed asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, and this prompted a change in antiarrhythmic therapy. Both died suddenly of arrhythmia during substitute empiric antiarrhythmic drug therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Procainamide, disopyramide and quinidine: discordant antiarrhythmic effects during crossover comparison in patients with inducible ventricular tachycardia

A crossover comparison of intravenous procainamide, disopyramide and quinidine was made in 32 patients. All three drugs had dosage-related effects on electrocardiographic intervals, refractory periods and cycle length of ventricular tachycardia. Significant linear relations between serum drug levels and changes in refractory periods and ventricular tachycardia cycle length were also observed. Ventricular tachycardia was no longer inducible on at least one drug in 11 patients but concordance of this effect on both of the others was 36% and on either of the others it was 45%. Ventricular tachycardia remained inducible on at least one drug in 28 patients and concordance of this effect on both of the others was 75% and on either of the others was 79%. Continued inducibility on quinidine, the drug producing the greatest electrophysiologic effects, was the best individual predictor of continued inducibility on the others. Subdivision of continued inducibility into easier to induce, inducibility unchanged, or harder to induce dramatically decreased concordance of this effect. Thus the antiarrhythmic effects of these drugs are discordant in individual patients despite electrophysiologic similarities. Nevertheless, continued inducibility after high dosages of any one of these drugs is clinically useful for screening for continued inducibility on the others and this is dose-related rather than drug specific.     

Prediction of successful suppression of sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias by serial drug testing from data derived at the initial electrophysiologic study

This study investigated whether data available after the initial electrophysiologic study in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia could identify those patients in whom serial drug testing is likely to be efficacious. One hundred six patients with inducible sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia, whose initial study included short-term drug testing with intravenous procainamide, were evaluated. The baseline arrhythmia induced (in the absence of all antiarrhythmic drugs) was monomorphic tachycardia with a cycle length greater than 200 ms in 81 patients and ventricular flutter or fibrillation in the remaining 25 patients. After intravenous infusion of procainamide (1,250 +/- 300 mg), a ventricular tachyarrhythmia could still be induced in 80 patients during testing with up to three extrastimuli. Serial drug testing with one to four trials of oral conventional and investigational agents was then undertaken. Evaluation of 15 clinical, hemodynamic and electrophysiologic variables by stepwise logistic regression identified two independent predictors of successful response to oral antiarrhythmic drugs: 1) noninducibility of ventricular tachycardia after intravenous procainamide (p less than 0.001), and 2) left ventricular ejection fraction greater than or equal to 40% (p less than 0.05). Subgroup analysis combining each of these variables identified patients with a high, intermediate or low probability of finding a successful oral drug regimen. Patients whose arrhythmia was suppressed by intravenous procainamide had a 100% likelihood (if left ventricular ejection fraction was greater than or equal to 40%) or an 87% likelihood (if ejection fraction was less than 40%) of responding to an oral regimen.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)