Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for residual myopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment on eyes with residual myopia with or without astigmatism. METHODS: LASIK retreatment was performed on 35 eyes of 23 patients for correction of residual myopia, with or without astigmatism, with a mean manifest spherical equivalent refraction of -2.17+/-0.82 D (range, -1.00 to -3.87 D) and mean refractive astigmatism of -0.55+/-0.61 D (range, 0 to -1.75 D). Retreatment was performed 3 to 18 months after primary LASIK (mean, 5.1+/-2.6 mo). The corneal flap of the previous LASIK was lifted and laser ablation was performed using the Chiron-Technolas Keracor 116 excimer laser. Follow-up was 12 months for all eyes. RESULTS: At 1 year after retreatment, manifest spherical equivalent refraction was reduced to a mean -0.23+/-0.28 D (range, 0 to -0.87 D), and refractive astigmatism was reduced to a mean -0.16+/-0.25 D (range, 0 to -0.75 D). Thirty-two eyes (91.5%) had a manifest spherical equivalent refraction within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 33 eyes (94.3%) had 0 to 0.50 D of refractive astigmatism. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 11 eyes (31.4%). Spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not reduced in any eye after retreatment. There were no significant complications. CONCLUSION: LASIK retreatment was effective for correction of residual myopia or astigmatism after primary LASIK. Refractive results were predictable with good stability after 3 months. Lifting the flap during LASIK retreatment was relatively easy to perform and did not result in visual morbidity in eyes treated from 3 up to 18 months after primary LASIK.     

Outcomes of retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of retreatment after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 962 eyes of 566 patients underwent LASIK for up to -20.0 diopters (D) of myopia, of which 53 eyes (5.5%) were retreated. INTERVENTION: Retreatments were performed by lifting the original flap and using the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser (Nidek Inc., Tokyo, Japan). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), fogged manifest refraction, and complications were evaluated 6 months after retreatment. RESULTS: Overall, 53 (5.5%) of 962 eyes underwent LASIK retreatment. Before retreatment, the mean spherical equivalent (MSE) was -1.7 +/- 1.1 D (range, +0.3 to -5.0 D), UCVA ranged from 20/25 to 20/400, and BCVA ranged from 20/20 to 20/50. Six months after retreatment, the MSE was -0.09 +/- 0.29 D, 48 (90.6%) eyes were within +/-0.5 D, and all eyes were within +/-1.0 D of the attempted correction. The UCVA improved to 20/20 or better in 21 (39.6%) eyes and 20/40 or better in 51 (96.2%) eyes. The BCVA was maintained in 33 eyes (62.3%), 15 eyes (28.3%) gained 1 line or more of vision, whereas 5 eyes (9.4%) lost 1 line. All eyes had a BCVA of 20/50 or better. No retreated eye lost two or more lines of BCVA. No complications were observed. CONCLUSION: Retreatment for low amounts of residual myopia performed by lifting the original flap within the first year after surgery after myopic LASIK is safe, effective, and predictable.     

Flap lift for LASIK retreatment in eyes with myopia

PURPOSE: To analyze the results achieved with LASIK retreatment after lifting the original flap in a large series of patients. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative, interventional consecutive case series. PARTICIPANTS: Two thousand four hundred twenty-two consecutive eyes undergoing LASIK surgery for myopia, including 334 eyes submitted to flap lift for LASIK retreatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity, best-corrected visual acuity, refractive error, and complications. RESULTS: LASIK retreatment was performed in 334 eyes (14%), and the mean time between initial procedure and retreatment was 8.2+/-6.2 months. The mean spherical equivalent (SE) improved from -1.2+/-0.6 diopters (D) (range, -4.2 to +1.2 D) before retreatment to +0.2+/-0.4 D (range, -3.1 to +1.1 D) after the retreatment. The uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) after retreatment was 20/20 or better in 58% and 20/40 or better in 92% of eyes. The mean SE was within +/-1.0 D in 96% of the patients and within +/-0.5 D in 80.5% after retreatment. Eighteen eyes (5%) lost 1 line of best-corrected visual acuity, and 4 eyes (1%) lost 2 lines. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK retreatment surgery performed by relifting the flap was a useful procedure for correcting residual refractive errors after the primary LASIK procedure. It provided good uncorrected visual acuity, predictable results, good refractive stability, and few complications.     

Results of laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia of -10 to -19 diopters with a Technolas 217 laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia greater than -10.00 D. METHODS: Sixty-five eyes of 37 patients with myopia greater than -10.00 D underwent LASIK. Patients were evaluated on day 1, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), residual refractive error, regression of correction, and presence of any complication. RESULTS: Mean preoperative BSCVA was 0.745 +/- 0.234, which improved to 0.8070 +/- 0.237 postoperatively. The average preoperative UCVA was 0.022 +/- 0.02; postoperative UCVA at 6 months was 0.536 +/- 0.255. UCVA of 20/40 or better was achieved in 58% (38 eyes) and 20/20 or better in 26% (17 eyes). The average refractive error before LASIK was -12.64 +/- 2.16 D (range -10.00 to -19.00 D). Mean residual refractive error 1 week following LASIK was -0.63 +/- 1.36 D, which regressed to a mean -1.78 +/- 2.08 D at the end of 6 months. Nineteen eyes (29%) were within +/-0.50 D of intended refractive correction. CONCLUSION: LASIK was partially effective in the correction of high myopia. An initial overcorrection may be programmed to offset the effect of refractive regression.     

Effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) to treat residual refractive errors after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTINGS: Isik Eye Clinic, Ankara, Turkey. METHODS: This retrospective study included 24 eyes of 15 patients who had retreatment by LASEK for residual refractive errors after myopic LASIK. All patients had examinations that included slitlamp biomicroscopy, subjective and cycloplegic refractions, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, corneal topography, and pachymetry preoperatively and postoperatively. Postoperative examinations were performed at 1 week and 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 9 men and 6 women. The median spherical equivalent (SE) of attempted correction for retreatment with LASEK was -1.25 diopters (D). The median follow-up after LASEK was 11.5 months (range 6 to 16 months). At the end of the follow-up, the median SE of the refractive error was -0.38 D. The median UCVA increased from 20/45 before LASEK to 20/25 at the last follow-up visit, which was statistically significant (P<.001). After LASEK, significant postoperative haze developed in 5 eyes. In all 5 eyes, the estimated ablation depth was more than 40 mum and the SE of attempted correction was -2.00 D or greater. CONCLUSIONS: Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment in eyes with myopic regression after LASIK resulted in a significant improvement in UCVA that was comparable to the improvement after flap lifting. An SE of attempted correction greater than -2.00 D was associated with a significant rate of haze.     

Retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment for correcting residual myopia.DesignRetrospective noncomparative case series.Participants and interventionFifty-nine consecutive eyes (43 patients) underwent LASIK retreatment at 3 or 6 months after the primary LASIK procedure. Lifting the corneal flap and reablating the stromal bed with a VISX 20/20 excimer laser was the procedure used for LASIK enhancement.Main outcome measuresThe following parameters were studied before and after retreatment: visual acuity, refraction, videokeratography, applanation tonometry, and corneal thickness. Complications after LASIK enhancement also were evaluated. Follow-up was 12 months.ResultsBefore retreatment, only 3.38% of eyes (2 of 59) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.5 (20/40) or better, and after retreatment, this percentage increased to 60% (30 of 50) at 6 months and 61.8% (34 of 55) at 12 months. After reoperation, mean best-corrected visual acuity improved by half a line over the values before retreatment. The preretreatment refraction of −2.92 ± 1.22 diopters (D) (mean ± standard deviation) decreased significantly to −0.44 ± 0.80 D at 6 months and to −0.61 ± 0.82 D at 12 months (P < 0.001). In 82% of eyes (41 of 50) at 6 months and 81.8% (45 of 55) at 12 months, the spherical equivalent was within 1.00 D of emmetropia. There was a significant regression of effect (0.38 D) between 3 and 12 months (P < 0.01). Postretreatment refraction was related to the original refraction before the primary LASIK, the preretreatment refraction, and the ablation diameter used. Although no vision-threatening complications were found, epithelial ingrowth and flap melting were more common after than before LASIK retreatment, with 31% of eyes at 12 months with epithelial ingrowth and 10.9% with flap melting. However, LASIK enhancement improved decentration and night-vision problems.ConclusionsLASIK retreatment was an effective and predictable procedure for correcting residual myopia. Epithelial ingrowth and flap melting were more frequent after than before LASIK retreatment, whereas decentration and night-vision symptoms improved.     

Tracker-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using the autonomous scanning and tracking laser: 12-month results

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, efficacy, and predictability of the Autonomous scanning and tracking laser for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism with laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) procedure. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: The first 129 consecutive eyes with up to -13.00 diopters (D) of myopia and -5.00 D of astigmatism. INTERVENTION: Myopic tracker-assisted LASIK (T-LASIK) using the Autonomous Laser (Alcon Summit Autonomous, Waltham, MA) and Hansatome microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb Surgical, Bracknell, England). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), manifest spherical equivalent (MSE), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications were studied. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean MSE was -0.02 +/- 1.01 D, with 79.1% of eyes within 0.5 D and 89.9% of eyes within 1 D of the intended correction. UCVA was 20/20 or better in 71.4%, 20/25 or better in 78.5%, and 20/40 or better in 92.8% of eyes. Two eyes (1.6%) lost 2 lines and five eyes (3.8%) gained 2 lines of BSCVA. Sixteen eyes (12.4%) required retreatment to correct residual myopia or astigmatism. After retreatment, 14 of 16 eyes were within 0.5 D of emmetropia. Nine eyes (6.9%) had minor flap complications; two eyes (1.6%) had grade 2 diffuse lamellar keratitis, of which one eye had associated peripheral flap melt. One eye showed slight decentration; this eye was rolling throughout the procedure. All eyes had some dryness, with 10% severe enough to require temporary punctual occlusion with plugs. CONCLUSIONS: T-LASIK for myopic astigmatism with the Autonomous Laser is relatively safe, effective, and predictable. The tracker seems to be effective, and the complications are relatively few. Retreatment rates are acceptable and can be performed safely and effectively to improve visual outcome. The outcomes are comparable with other published data.     

Recutting the cornea versus lifting the flap: comparison of two enhancement techniques following laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate enhancement techniques following laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). METHODS: Recutting was performed on 263 eyes and the flap was lifted in 55 eyes that had LASIK for simple myopia or myopic astigmatism. The time interval between LASIK and retreatment was 340+/-46 days (range, 270 to 892 days) in the recutting group and 215+/-36 days (range, 53 to 617 days) in the flap lifting group. Mean spherical equivalent refraction, refractive cylinder, uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity were examined prior to, and 1, 3, and 6 months after retreatment. RESULTS: Seventeen eyes were lost to follow-up in the lifting group and 53 eyes in the recutting group. In the recutting group, mean spherical equivalent refraction improved from -1.48+/-1.25 D to -0.49+/-0.88 D at 6 months. In the flap lifting group, mean spherical equivalent refraction improved from -1.05+/-1.49 D to -0.45+/-0.39 D at 6 months. Refractive cylinder did not change significantly in either group (P = .2). There was a significant increase in uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 6/6 in each group. In the recutting group, UCVA of 6/6 increased from 3.8% to 65.2% at 6 months, and in the lifting group from 3.6% to 71.1% at 6 months. In the recutting group, seven free flaps and three macerated flaps that required removal occurred. One eye in the recutting group and two in the lifting group developed significant epithelial ingrowth. No patient lost more than one line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA). CONCLUSION: Both procedures were safe, effective, and highly predictable for enhancements, but flap complications may be more likely with recutting.     

Comparison of laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for the correction of myopia of -6.00 diopters or less. Melbourne Excimer Laser Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) compared to photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of low or moderate myopia (-0.50 to -6.00 D) at 6 months after surgery. METHODS: The study population comprised a non-randomized consecutive series of 622 eyes of 392 patients who were treated with the Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser. LASIK was performed using the ACS Chiron microkeratome on 314 eyes and surface PRK on 308 eyes. All patients were treated using a standard protocol, then assessed at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of the LASIK group and 67% of the PRK group attended their 6-month examination. Eighty percent of patients (111 eyes) after LASIK and 65% (136 eyes) after PRK had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Spherical equivalent refraction was within +/-0.50 D of intended refraction in 78% (109 eyes) for LASIK and 82% (170 eyes) for PRK. Loss of two more lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 6 months occurred in 1.4% (2 eyes) of the LASIK group and 1.0% (2 eyes) of the PRK group. CONCLUSION: At 1 month follow-up, the percentage of eyes that achieved 20/20 uncorrected visual acuity was greater in the LASIK group than in the PRK group. At 6 months, visual and refractive outcomes of LASIK and PRK were similar. Although flap related complications occurred only after LASIK, the overall risk of loss of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was not significantly greater than for PRK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after photorefractive keratectomy

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after primary photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: A retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Thirty-six consecutive eyes of 30 patients underwent LASIK after primary PRK. A Multiscan Schwind excimer laser was used for LASIK enhancement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refraction, videokeratography, and complications were determined before and after LASIK retreatment. Follow-up was at least 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 11.11% of eyes showed a UCVA of 20/40 or better. This increased to 94.44% 12 months after LASIK. A UCVA of 20/25 or better was achieved in 0% before and in 72.22% after retreatment. Refraction +/-0.5 diopters (spherical equivalent) represented 0% of eyes before and 77.78% of eyes after enhancement. Before LASIK, two eyes had significant haze. Haze remained in these two eyes and appeared in another eye. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis proved to be safe and effective for treating residual myopia after PRK. Care must be taken when considering LASIK retreatment in patients with significant haze after primary PRK.     

LASIK治疗近视散光的临床观察

目的:观察准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situ kera-tomileusis,LASIK)治疗近视散光的临床疗效。方法:应用鹰视准分子激光治疗系统对120例234眼近视散光进行LASIK手术治疗。随访12mo,比较手术前后的视力、屈光度、散光及其散光轴位的变化。结果:术后随访12mo,裸眼视力≥术前最佳矫正视力(BCVA)者108例213眼(91%),屈光度在±1.00D以内者112例222眼(94.8%),散光残留平均为-0.52D。结论:LASIK治疗近视散光效果好,稳定性高,安全可靠。     

Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) retreatment after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Mater Private Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 22 eyes of 20 patients had LASEK retreatment for residual refractive errors after LASIK. All patients who had the procedure between January 2004 and May 2007 were included in the study. The main outcome measures at the final follow-up visit were efficacy, predictability, safety, and stability. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.50 diopters (D)+/-2.88 (SD) (range -10.00 to +3.87 D) before LASIK and -1.23+/-0.95 D (range -2.50 to +2.00 D) after LASIK. The mean time between the initial LASIK procedure and LASEK enhancement was 56.2+/-24.3 months (range 6 to 84 months). The mean follow-up after retreatment was 6.68+/-6.47 months (range 3 to 24 months). At the final follow-up visit, 19 eyes (86.4%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better and 17 eyes (77.3%) were within +/-1.00 D of the target refraction. No patient lost more than 1 line of best corrected visual acuity or developed corneal haze greater than grade 1. CONCLUSION: Results indicate that LASEK retreatment after LASIK is a safe and effective alternative when LASIK retreatment is deemed unsafe because there is not sufficient residual corneal stromal bed or when retreatment is required many years after LASIK and relifting the original flap is expected to be problematic.     

Safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement by flap reelevation in high myopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment following primary procedures for high myopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Corneal Diseases and Excimer Laser Research Unit, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom. METHODS: This prospective observational study of retreatment comprised a cohort of 109 eyes having primary LASIK for high myopia and astigmatism with a spherical equivalent (SE) of -9.70 diopters (D) +/- 4.06 (SD). Twenty-four eyes (22%) with an initial myopic SE of -9.83 +/- 3.50 D, a comparable subset of the entire group (P < .05), had retreatment for residual myopia (-3.02 +/- 2.17 D) to improve uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) by reelevating the corneal flap and ablating the stromal bed. RESULTS: The mean follow-up after retreatment was 12.8 +/- 5.1 months (range 1.5 to 24 months; 19 eyes >/=6 months, 13 eyes > or = 12 months). The mean myopic SE was reduced to +0.53 +/- 0.62 D at 1 week, +0.05 +/- 0.50 D at 1 month, +0.30 +/- 0.50 D at 6 months, and +0.18 +/- 0.42 D at the latest follow-up, 12.8 months. At the latest review, 62% of eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia and 100% were within +/-1.00 D. The mean refraction did not alter statistically between 1 week and subsequent times. The mean UCVA improved from 6/30 prior to retreatment to 6/9 at the latest follow-up. Uncorrected visual acuity of 6/6 or better, 6/9 or better, and 6/12 or better was achieved by 33.0%, 75.0%, and 95.8% of eyes, respectively. No significant complications that led to a loss of best corrected visual acuity were encountered, although retreatment procedures were more uncomfortable than primary procedures and self-limiting; epithelial ingrowth that did not threaten vision was common, and 2 patients complained of nighttime visual symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Retreatment of residual myopia by reelevating the flap was relatively safe and predictable, with a low risk of sight-threatening complications. However, longer term studies may be required to detect late complications.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients underwent LASIK for the correction of residual myopia after cataract surgery. LASIK was carried out using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. In all eyes, the follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 1 eye (4.5%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.5 or better; 12 months after LASIK, 10 eyes (45.4%) achieved this level of visual acuity and 0 eyes achieved 1.00 or better. Before LASIK, mean refraction was -2.90 +/- 1.80 D; 12 months after LASIK it decreased significantly to 0.40 +/- 0.60 D (P < .01). In 18 eyes (81.8%) at 12 months after LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; 11 eyes (50%) were within 0.50 D. No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Automated Corneal Shaper and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was an effective, predictable, stable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery. No intraocular lens or cataract incision related complications occurred when LASIK was performed at least 3 months after phacoemulsification.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after radial keratotomy

PURPOSE: To present results of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) enhancement after radial keratotomy (RK). METHODS: Sixteen eyes of 10 patients were treated with LASIK for residual myopia and hyperopia after RK. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -3.14+/-3.04 D (range, -6.675 to +6.00 D). Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 9 eyes, 20/25 in 6 eyes, and 20/30 in 1 eye. Uncorrected visual acuity was better than 20/40 in only 2 eyes. Patients were followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months, and 1 year. Mean follow-up was 8.3 months (range, 1 to 17 mo). RESULTS: All eyes received one LASIK enhancement. Mean final spherical equivalent refraction was +0.16+/-0.68 D (range, -1.00 to +1.75 D). No eyes experienced any visual loss. Five eyes gained 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 in 9 eyes, 20/25 in 6 eyes, and 20/30 in 1 eye. Two eyes of one patient had the previous RK incisions open. CONCLUSION: LASIK was an effective treatment for correction of residual myopia and hyperopia after RK.     

Outcomes after laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment in high myopes

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive and visual performance after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) retreatment. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on 33 eyes of 23 patients who underwent LASIK (Bausch & Lomb Technolas 217C) retreatment for residual myopia with or without astigmatism. Parameters evaluated were uncorrected and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, spherical equivalent refraction, contrast sensitivity, glare acuity, and pachymetry, preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent refraction before primary LASIK was -9.89 +/- 4.00 D and before retreatment was -2.85 +/- 2.17 D. Although contrast sensitivity and glare acuity decreased significantly after primary LASIK (P<.05), no significant change in these parameters was observed after retreatment. Smaller ablation zones were associated with decreased contrast sensitivity and glare acuity after primary LASIK as well as following retreatment. Contrast sensitivity and glare acuity following primary LASIK were significantly better in eyes with ablation zones > or = 5 mm than those with < 5 mm (P<.05). Eyes in which the ablation zone was the same as that for primary LASIK had significantly better contrast sensitivity than those with different ablation zones (increased or decreased) during retreatment. Attempted refractive correction during primary LASIK and retreatment had a significant negative correlation with contrast sensitivity and glare acuity following primary LASIK as well as retreatment. CONCLUSION: The ablation zones following primary LASIK and retreatment should be > or = 5.00 mm and remain unchanged to improve visual performance.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual myopia after primary LASIK

PURPOSE: To analyze the results of secondary laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for residual myopia after primary LASIK. SETTING: Dr. Agarwal's Eye Hospital, Chennai, India. METHODS: A retrospective study of 50 eyes of 29 patients who had a secondary LASIK procedure was carried out. After a mean follow-up of 5.84 months +/- 3.24 (SD) after the primary procedure, the mean myopic residual refraction was -4.30 +/- 1.83 diopters (D). In 10 eyes, the primary corneal flap was lifted by blunt dissection. In 40 eyes, the flap was made with a second cut. The secondary LASIK was performed using the Chiron Technolas Keracor 217 excimer laser and the Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb). RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 16.58 +/- 3.06 months. At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent was -0.45 +/- 0.68 D (P <.05). Thirty-one eyes were emmetropic, 13 eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia, and 5 eyes were within +/-2.00 D. The mean uncorrected visual acuity improved from 20/80 (range 20/60 to 20/200) to 20/40 (range 20/20 to 20/200) (P <.005). Seventeen eyes gained 1 line of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity; 1 eye lost 1 line because of a decentered ablation with an induced postoperative astigmatism of -3.50 D cylinder. No sight-threatening complications such as a free cap, flap irregularity, corneal ectasia, or retinal complication occurred postoperatively. Epithelial ingrowth developed in 5 eyes and corneal thinning, in 1 eye. Three eyes had night glare. CONCLUSION: Secondary LASIK was a safe, stable, and effective method for the treatment of residual myopia after primary LASIK.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for undercorrection after radial keratotomy.

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating residual myopia and/or astigmatism following refractive keratotomy. METHODS: Fourteen eyes that had previously undergone radial and/or arcuate keratotomy were included. The surgeries were performed using the Chiron Automated Microkeratome and the VISX 20/20B excimer laser. RESULTS: Average follow-up was 12.64+/-5.02 months. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was reduced from -3.48+/-3.52 D preoperatively to -0.04+/-0.87 D postoperatively. At the last follow-up examination there were 8 eyes (57.1%) with a refraction within+/-0.50 D, and 10 eyes (71.4%) within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Uncorrected visual acuity was 20/20 or better in 4 eyes (28.6%) and 20/40 or better in 10 eyes (71.4%). Vector analysis of the astigmatic correction showed an index of success of 80%. There was no significant loss (> or = or =2 lines) of spectacle-corrected visual acuity. We observed interface epithelial ingrowth in one eye. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of residual myopia and/or astigmatism with LASIK in eyes with prior refractive keratotomy proved to be safe and effective. Careful preoperative evaluation may help to avoid complications such as reopening of incisions during surgery or postoperative ingrowth of epithelium beneath the corneal flap.     

Hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis to treat overcorrected myopic LASIK

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in treating hyperopia caused by overcorrected myopic LASIK and to evaluate a new technique to place the hyperopic treatment after lifting the initial myopic flap. SETTING: Open-access outpatient excimer laser surgical facility. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 54 eyes in 47 patients who had spherical hyperopic LASIK by 21 surgeons for the treatment of significant hyperopia after overcorrected LASIK for myopia. In 42 eyes, the initial LASIK flaps were lifted and in 12 eyes, new flaps were cut. The mean age of the 25 men (53%) and 22 women (47%) was 48.2 years +/- 8.4 (SD). Outcome measures included refractive error, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications. The mean follow-up was 2.97 months. RESULTS: In eyes in which postoperative emmetropia was attempted (n = 45), the mean spherical equivalent improved from +1.21 +/- 0.49 diopters (D) preoperatively to -0.38 +/- 0.50 D postoperatively (P <.001). The mean UCVA improved from 20/38.6 +/- 16.3 to 20/27.4 +/- 9.4 (P <.001). At the last follow-up, 69% of eyes were within +/-0.5 D and 96% were within +/-1.0 D of emmetropia; 42% had a UCVA of 20/20 and 96% had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. No eyes lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. No vision-threatening complications occurred. Results in patients who had initial flaps lifted and those who had new flaps cut were statistically indistinguishable. On average, achieved hyperopic corrections were 18% greater than intended. CONCLUSION: Hyperopic LASIK was safe, predictable, and effective in the treatment of hyperopia caused by overcorrected myopic LASIK. Results were similar whether the original flap was lifted or a new one was cut.     

LASEK versus LASIK for the correction of moderate myopia.

PURPOSE: To compare the results of laser subepithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of moderate myopia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-masked, interventional study of 80 consecutive eyes. Forty eyes that had undergone LASEK to correct myopia of -2.0 to -6.0 D were compared with age and refraction matched patients treated with LASIK. All eyes had been operated by the same experienced surgeon using the same laser (Technolas 217). Mitomycin C was not used in any patient. RESULTS: Eighty eyes were reviewed (40 treated with LASEK, 40 treated with LASIK). The preoperative mean sphere was -3.8 D (range -2 to -6D) and mean cylinder was -0.7 D (range 0 to -2 D) in both groups. Postoperative uncorrected visual acuity was worse in LASEK eyes 1 and 7 days postoperatively (p = 0.0001), although the difference 7 days postoperatively ( 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: LASEK and LASIK seem to be similar in terms of safety and efficacy for the correction of moderate myopia. Nevertheless, a trend toward overcorrection was found in the LASEK group in correlation with a higher preoperative refractive error.