Significance of incidental 18F-FDG accumulations in the gastrointestinal tract in PET/CT: correlation with endoscopic and histopathologic results.

This study was undertaken to identify the clinical value of incidentally detected lesions (IDLs) in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) with (18)F-FDG PET/CT. METHODS: The reported database of 3,281 patients who underwent partial-body (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans from April 2001 to September 2003 was reviewed. Patients with incidental (18)F-FDG accumulations in the GIT that were associated with concomitant abnormal soft-tissue density or wall thickening on the native CT were evaluated. Incidental PET/CT findings were correlated with endoscopic and histopathologic results. RESULTS: According to our selection criteria, 98 (3%) of the 3,281 patients had an IDL of the GIT on (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Correlative endoscopic findings were available in 69 (70%) of 98 patients. Of these, 13 patients (19%) were harboring newly occurring cancers of the GIT in addition to preexisting aerodigestive tract tumors (n = 12) and malignant melanoma (n = 1). Twenty-nine (42%) patients were identified with precancerous lesions, such as advanced colonic adenomas (n = 27), Barrett's esophagus (n = 1), and intestinal metaplasia of the gastric mucosa (n = 1). Inflammatory and other benign GIT lesions were detected in 12 (17%) and 6 (8%) patients, respectively. In 9 (13%) patients, PET/CT was false-positive, showing normal findings in subsequent endoscopic examinations. In 20 (28%) of 69 patients, PET/CT findings had a relevant impact on the clinical management. Twenty-nine (30%) of the 98 patients were not subject to a further endoscopic examination because of the extent and nature of the primary tumor (n = 17), loss to follow-up (n = 7), death shortly after PET (n = 3), and patient unwillingness (n = 2). CONCLUSION: Although IDLs of the GIT on (18)F-FDG PET/CT scans are found only in about 3% of cases, they are associated with a substantial risk of an underlying cancerous or precancerous lesion. Early identification of these occult lesions may have a major impact on the patients' management and outcome.     

Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET/CT for the Evaluation of Bone Marrow Involvement in Patients with High-Grade Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

Purpose

To assess the usefulness of ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in the detection of bone marrow (BM) involvement of high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL).

Methods

One hundred twenty patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or peripheral T-cell lymphoma between January 2007 and June 2011, who received BM trephine biopsy and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before chemotherapy, were included in this retrospective study. We reviewed their ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT images and bone marrow biopsy (BMB) results. After reviewing the images, we reviewed the medical records and radiological findings of interesting patients.

Results

There were 23 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans in which the marrow was considered to be abnormal (either positive or equivocal), and 97 ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were regarded as having negative FDG uptake. Of 120 patients, 100 (83.3 %) had a concordant result of BM interpretation between ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and BMB, and the remaining 20 patients had discordant results. Among 23 patients with either positive or equivocal ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans, 1 of 12 patients with ‘positive’ ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had a lymphomatous involvement on BMB. In contrast, 10 of 11 patients with ‘equivocal’ BM hypermetabolism were reported as having positive involvement by BMB. Patients with abnormal ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT had significantly higher mSUV_highest than those with normal FDG-PET/CT.

Conclusions

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and BMB are complementary techniques in assessing the presence of BM involvement in patients with high-grade NHL. The increasing availability of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT will raise the need for additional biopsy for FDG-avid lesions, especially in patients with negative standard BMBs. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can be useful as a decision-making tool for determining whether to perform a standard BMB or targeted biopsy to the FDG-avid lesion as an initial staging procedure. A direct bone biopsy for FDGpositive bone lesions should be included in staging guidelines in future. In ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT-negative cases, BMB is still a powerful procedure, but BMB alone is insufficient for full evaluation of BM.     

Prognostic value of PET using 18F-FDG in Hodgkin's disease for posttreatment evaluation.

Detection of relapse after completion of therapy in patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL) constitutes an important challenge in modern medical imaging. An accurate assessment of the presence of residual disease is essential to determine which patients would benefit from additional therapy. The objective of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET in detecting residual disease or relapse during the posttherapy period in patients with HD in comparison with CT. We also established different predictive values for (18)F-FDG PET according to the time interval between the end of therapy and the PET study. METHODS: Forty-eight patients with HD underwent (18)F-FDG PET after the completion of chemotherapy (median, 58 d) between March 1999 and April 2002. Disease-free intervals and proportions were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Standardized uptake values of the most active lesion in each patient with a positive study were also measured. PET and CT results were compared with clinical follow-up, with relapse being defined by a positive biopsy or the introduction of a second-line treatment. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were still disease-free during a mean follow-up of 605 d. Fourteen patients relapsed during a mean follow-up of 197 d. The sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG PET to predict relapse were 79% and 97%, respectively. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were both equal to 92%. The diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET (92%) was significantly higher than the accuracy of CT (56%) (P < 0.0005). Patients with positive (18)F-FDG PET also had a far shorter median disease-free interval (79 d) than those with positive CT (disease-free proportion of 52% at 1,143 d) (P = 0.0046). The 3 cases of false-negative (18)F-FDG PET studies that we observed occurred in patients who underwent their PET study within the first 49 d after the end of chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Positive (18)F-FDG PET after the end of therapy in HD patients is a strong predictor of relapse. A negative PET study is also an excellent predictor of good prognosis. The diagnostic accuracy of (18)F-FDG PET to assess the presence of residual disease after therapy is superior to that of CT.     

^18F-FDG PET／CT在自然杀伤／T细胞淋巴瘤显像诊断及分期中的应用

目的探讨^18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET／CT在自然杀伤（NK）／T细胞淋巴瘤的病灶检测及分期中的价值。方法13例初诊和2例复发NK／T细胞淋巴瘤患者行全身^18F-FDGPET／CT显像。病灶处出现^18F-FDG异常浓聚为阳性。^18F-FDG摄取采用最大标准摄取值（SUVmax）进行定量。所有受检者随访时间均〉6个月。统计学比较用t检验。结果（1）15例NK／T细胞淋巴瘤患者^18F-FDG PET／CT显像均为阳性。11例鼻型患者中,10例PET／CT于鼻腔或鼻咽部探测到肿瘤病灶,且6例突出鼻腔外侵及鼻旁周围组织,7例PET／CT显像于鼻腔外发现1处或多处淋巴瘤受侵病灶。4例非鼻型患者,PET／CT于鼻腔外发现多部位肿瘤侵犯。鼻内、鼻外病灶的SUVmax分别为12．42±9．25和9．54±7．12,两者差异无统计学意义（t=1．120,P〉0．05）。（2）15例中有2例显像前不明原因发热者在PET／CT引导下行病理检查,明确诊断。13例诊断已明确者,7例PET／CT发现更多淋巴瘤病灶,6例因PET／CT检查改变分期。Ⅰ～Ⅱ期患者的SUVmax;稍低于Ⅲ～Ⅳ期者,分别为8．44±5．56和10．32±7．80,但差异无统计学意义（t=0．757,P〉0．05）。结论NK／T细胞淋巴瘤病灶呈^18F-FDG高摄取;在其病灶检测和分期方面,PET／CT显像有优势。     

PET/CT detection of unexpected gastrointestinal foci of 18F-FDG uptake: incidence, localization patterns, and clinical significance.

Precise PET/CT localization of focal (18)F-FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract (GIT) may exclude malignancy in sites of physiologic activity but may also induce false-negative reports for malignant or premalignant lesions. The purpose of the present study was to retrospectively evaluate the nature and significance of unexpected focal (18)F-FDG uptake localized by PET/CT within the GIT. METHODS: The files of 4,390 patients referred for (18)F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively reviewed. The incidence of studies showing unexpected focal uptake of (18)F-FDG localized by PET/CT to the GIT was determined. The position of these foci along the GIT and their intensity were recorded. The etiology of the findings was confirmed histologically or by long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Unexpected focal (18)F-FDG uptake in the GIT was found in 58 patients (1.3%). Follow-up data were available for 34 of these patients, including 4 with sites in the stomach, 2 in the small bowel, and 28 in the colon. GIT-related disease was confirmed in 24 patients (71%). There were 11 malignant tumors, 9 premalignant lesions, and 4 benign processes including 2 benign polyps, 1 case of active gastritis, and 1 abscess of the sigmoid. Ten patients (29%) had no further evidence of GIT abnormality, and the suggestive sites were considered to be physiologic uptake. Maximal standardized uptake value was 17.3 +/- 10.2 in malignant lesions, 14.0 +/- 10.5 in premalignant lesions, 18.0 +/- 12.1 in benign lesions, and 11.1 +/- 7.4 in foci of physiologic (18)F-FDG uptake in the GIT, with no statistically significant difference among the 4 subgroups. CONCLUSION: Incidental focal (18)F-FDG uptake localized by PET/CT within the GIT is of clinical significance in most patients. These findings should be followed up with appropriate invasive procedures guided by hybrid imaging results.     

Prosthetic vascular graft infection: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Graft infection after prosthetic vascular reconstruction is an uncommon but severe complication. The clinical presentation is often subtle and nonspecific and may occur long after surgery. Although defining a prosthetic vascular graft infection can be difficult, early diagnosis and treatment are important because of the relatively high rates of amputation and death. The present study assessed the role of PET/CT using 18F-FDG for the diagnosis of vascular graft infections. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (35 men and 4 women; age range, 44-82 y) with suspected vascular graft infection underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT. The performance of PET/CT for the diagnosis of an infectious process and its localization to the graft or soft tissues was assessed. The final diagnosis was based on histopathologic findings and microbiologic assays obtained at surgery or on clinical and imaging follow-up. RESULTS: PET/CT detected foci of increased 18F-FDG uptake suspected as infection in 27 patients and localized these findings to the graft in 16 patients. Vascular graft infection was confirmed in 14 of these patients (88%). PET/CT excluded graft involvement in 11 patients, and in 10 (91%) of these 11, long-term follow-up further confirmed that the infectious process was limited to surrounding soft tissues only. No abnormal 18F-FDG uptake was found in any of the 12 patients with no further evidence of infection. PET/CT had a sensitivity of 93%, specificity of 91%, positive predictive value of 88%, and negative predictive value of 96% for the diagnosis of vascular graft infection. CONCLUSION: 18F-FDG PET/CT is a reliable noninvasive imaging modality for the diagnosis of vascular graft-related infection. The precise anatomic localization of increased 18F-FDG uptake provided by PET/CT enables accurate differentiation between graft and soft-tissue infection.     

The role of 18F-FDG PET in staging and early prediction of response to therapy of recurrent gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are gaining the interest of researchers because of impressive metabolic response to the targeted molecular therapeutic drug imatinib mesylate. Initial reports suggest an impressive role for (18)F-FDG PET in follow-up of therapy for these tumors. However, the role of (18)F-FDG PET versus that of CT has not been established. Therefore, we compared the roles of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging and evaluation of early response to imatinib mesylate therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST. METHODS: The study included 54 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans within 3 wk before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. Forty-nine of these patients underwent repeat scans 2 mo after therapy. The numbers of sites or organs containing lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans were compared. Corresponding lesions on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans or those confirmed to be malignant in appearance by other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered true positives. Lesions seen on (18)F-FDG PET or CT scans but not seen or confirmed to be of benign appearance with other imaging modalities or on follow-up were considered false positives. Measurements of the maximum standard uptake value (SUV) on (18)F-FDG PET scans and tumor size on CT scans were used for quantitative evaluation of early tumor response to therapy. RESULTS: A total of 122 and 114 sites and/or organs were involved on pretherapy (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans, respectively. The sensitivity and positive predictive values (PPVs) for CT were 93% and 100%; whereas these values for (18)F-FDG PET were 86% and 98%. However, the differences between these values for CT and (18)F-FDG PET were not statistically significant (P = 0.27 for sensitivity and 0.25 for PPV). This suggests comparable performance of (18)F-FDG PET and CT in staging GISTs. Repeat scans at 2 mo after therapy showed agreement between (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans in 71.4% of patients (57.1% having a good response to therapy and 14.3% lacking a response). Discrepant results between (18)F-FDG PET and CT were recorded for 28.6% of the patients. (18)F-FDG PET predicted response to therapy earlier than did CT in 22.5% of patients during a longer follow-up interval (4-16 mo), whereas CT predicted lack of response to therapy earlier than (18)F-FDG PET in 4.1%. One patient did not undergo long-term follow-up. These findings suggest that (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy in recurrent or metastatic GIST patients. CONCLUSION: The performances of (18)F-FDG PET and CT are comparable in staging GISTs before initiation of imatinib mesylate therapy. However, (18)F-FDG PET is superior to CT in predicting early response to therapy. Thus, (18)F-FDG PET is a better guide for imatinib mesylate therapy.     

Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT in staging and follow-up of lymphoma in pediatric and young adult patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the role of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in pediatric patients with Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). MATERIALS AND METHODS: 31 patients, mean age 12.9 +/- 5.1, HD (n = 24), and NHL (n = 7) underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at diagnosis (n = 31 studies) and later in the course of the disease (n = 75 studies). The findings of PET/CT were correlated with diagnostic CT and clinical follow-up. RESULTS: PET/CT findings resulted in a change of disease staging in 10 patients (32.3%), upstaging in 7 (22.6%) and downstaging in 3 (9.6%). On a lesion analysis, 164 disease sites were detected by PET/CT of which 38 were overlooked by DCT.At mid-treatment, PET was negative in 28 out of 31 patients (90%) with negative predictive value of 96% as all latter patients except for 1, were disease free (mean 15.4 +/- 8.8 months). The positive predictive value of persistent increased 18F-FDG uptake was 100% as 3 patients with latter findings had active disease. On the CT part, 76 residual masses were identified in 22 patients. Increased 18F-FDG uptake was detected in 11 masses in 4 patients who had active disease. Remaining 65 PET negative masses were false positive findings. The positive predictive value of residual CT mass was 14%. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT is associated with change in staging in approximately 1 out of 3 pediatric patients with HD and NHL. When used for monitoring response to treatment, a negative study is associated with disease-free period, even when residual mass is detected. A positive PET study indicates residual malignant disease.     

Chemokine receptor-4 targeted PET/CT with 68 Ga-Pentixafor in assessment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: comparison to 18 F-FDG PET/CT

18F-FDG PET/CT has some limitations in the evaluation of multiple myeloma (MM). Since chemokine receptor-4 is overexpressed in MM, we perform a prospective cohort study to compare the performance of 68Ga-Pentixafor and 18F-FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed MM. Thirty patients with newly diagnosed MM were recruited. All patients underwent 68Ga-Pentixafor and18F-FDG PET/CT within 1 week after enrollment. A positive PET/CT was defined as the presence of focal PET-positive lesions in bone marrow or diffuse bone marrow patterns (uptake > liver). Bone marrow uptake values in 68Ga-Pentixafor and18F-FDG PET/CT (total bone marrow glycolysis [TBmGFDG], total bone marrow uptake with 68Ga-Pentixafor [TBmUCXCR4], total bone marrow volume [TBmV], SUVmean, and SUVmax) were obtained by drawing total bone marrow volume of interest on PET/CT. The positive rates of the PET/CT scans were statistically compared, and the correlation between quantitative bone marrow uptake values and clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, and staging was analyzed. 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT had a higher positive rate than 18F-FDG PET/CT in recruited patients (93.3 vs. 53.3%, p = 0.0005). In quantitative analysis, bone marrow uptake values in 68Ga-Pentixafor (TBmUCXCR4, SUVmax, and SUVmean) were positively correlated with end organ damage, staging, and laboratory biomarkers related to tumor burden including serum β2-microglobulin, serum free light chain, and 24-h urine light chain (p < 0.05). In 18F-FDG PET/CT, only the SUVmean of total bone marrow was positively correlated with serum free light chain and 24-h urine light chain (p < 0.05). 68Ga-Pentixafor PET/CT is promising in assessment of newly diagnosed MM. NCT 03436342     

Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET identifies high-risk myeloma.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical utility of whole-body PET with (18)F-FDG in patients with multiple myeloma and related monoclonal diseases. METHODS: Between July 1, 1996, and July 2000, 98 (18)F-FDG PET scans were obtained for 66 patients, with 25 patients having 2 or more scans. The results were compared with routine clinical and staging information, including CT and MRI scans, as indicated. Of the 66 patients, 16 had previously untreated active myeloma, 14 had monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS), 10 had disease in remission, and 26 had relapsing disease. RESULTS: Negative whole-body (18)F-FDG PET findings reliably predicted stable MGUS. Of the 14 MGUS patients with follow-up of 3-43+ mo, myeloma has developed in only 1 (7%), at 8 mo. Conversely, the 16 previously untreated patients with active myeloma all had focal or diffusely positive scan findings. Four (25%) of 16 previously untreated patients with positive (18)F-FDG PET findings had negative full radiologic surveys. Another 4 (25%) of 16 patients had focal extramedullary disease. This was confirmed by biopsy or other imaging techniques. Extramedullary uptake also occurred in 6 (23%) of 26 patients with relapse. This extramedullary uptake was a very poor prognostic factor both before treatment and at relapse. For example, median survival was 7 mo for patients with disease relapse. Persistent positive (18)F-FDG PET findings after induction therapy predicted early relapse. In 13 (81%) of 16 patients with relapsing disease, new sites of disease were identified. The (18)F-FDG PET results were especially helpful in identifying focal recurrent disease in patients with nonsecretory or hyposecretory disease amenable to local irradiation therapy, which was used in 6 patients. CONCLUSION: Whole-body (18)F-FDG PET provides important prognostic information, which is clinically useful and complementary to conventional methods of evaluating plasma cell disorders. (18)F-FDG PET is a unique tool for evaluation of nonsecretory myeloma. Residual or recurrent disease after therapy, especially extramedullary disease, is a poor prognostic factor.     

Peritoneal carcinomatosis: role of (18)F-FDG PET.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis can be difficult to diagnose, as CT is insensitive, with peritoneal biopsy and lavage often subject to problems of sampling error. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of (18)F-FDG PET in detecting peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with stomach, ovarian, and adrenal cancer and mesothelioma and to compare the results with CT scans in the same patient group. Our secondary aim was to identify characteristic patterns of abdominal (18)F-FDG uptake in biopsy-proven peritoneal disease and to correlate these patterns with available histologic and anatomic findings after surgery and structural imaging. METHODS: The medical records of 88 patients with stomach (n = 48), ovarian (n = 13), and adrenal cancer (n = 6) and mesothelioma (n = 21) were reviewed for the presence of peritoneal tumor on (18)F-FDG PET and CT scans. The results were correlated with either contemporaneous peritoneal biopsy or ascitic aspirate or with radiographic or clinical follow-up if histology was negative or unavailable. Of 24 patients with suspected peritoneal tumor, 17 had biopsy-proven findings of peritoneal disease. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients with suspected peritoneal tumor, (18)F-FDG PET was positive in 14 patients, with 1 of these scans being false-positive, CT was positive in 10 patients, and either PET or CT was positive in 18 patients. This yielded sensitivities of 57% (13/23), 42% (10/23), and 78% (18/23), with uniformly high positive predictive values of 93% (13/14), 100% (10/10), and 95% (18/19), respectively. We identified 2 distinctly abnormal scintigraphic patterns of focal and uniform (18)F-FDG uptake corresponding to nodular and diffuse peritoneal disease on pathologic examination. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET adds to conventional imaging in the staging of peritoneal carcinomatosis. It is also a useful diagnostic tool when peritoneal biopsy is either unavailable or inappropriate. We have identified 2 distinct scintigraphic patterns that appear to predict the presence of either nodular or diffuse peritoneal pathology.     

Detection of Richter's transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia by PET/CT.

Our objective was to evaluate the accuracy of PET/CT for the diagnosis of Richter's transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) to diffuse large cell lymphoma. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of 37 patients with CLL who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT at our institution between March 2003 and July 2005. All PET/CT scans were reviewed in consensus by 2 diagnostic radiologists. Sites of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake with a maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of greater than 5 were considered highly suggestive of Richter's transformation. The PET/CT findings were correlated with histologic findings from bone marrow or lymph node biopsy performed within 6 wk of PET/CT and with clinical follow-up. RESULTS: The 37 patients (26 men and 11 women; mean age, 61 y, range, 40-82 y) underwent 57 PET/CT scans. In 10 (91%) of 11 patients with Richter's transformation, PET/CT detected sites of abnormal 18F-FDG uptake having an SUVmax of greater than 5. Richter's transformation was missed in 1 patient who had only low-grade 18F-FDG uptake (SUVmax < 5). Nine patients had false-positive PET/CT findings; in 3 of these patients, alternative malignancies were diagnosed (Hodgkin's disease; metastatic neuroendocrine carcinoma; non-small cell lung cancer). In all remaining patients, PET/CT correctly excluded Richter's transformation. For the specific diagnosis of Richter's transformation of CLL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, PET/CT had overall sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of 91%, 80%, and 53% and 97%, respectively. CONCLUSION: PET/CT can detect Richter's transformation of CLL to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with a high sensitivity and a high negative predictive value.     

Relations Between Pathological Markers and Radioiodine Scan and 18F-FDG PET/CT Findings in Papillary Thyroid Cancer Patients With Recurrent Cervical Nodal Metastases

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate relationships between the immunohistochemical results and radioiodine scan and ¹⁸F-FDG PET findings in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients with recurrent cervical nodal metastases.

Methods

A total of 46 PTC patients who had undergone a radioiodine scan and/or ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and a subsequent operation on recurrent cervical lymph nodes were enrolled. Twenty-seven patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, 8 underwent radioiodine scans, and 11 underwent both scans. In all surgical specimens, the immunoexpressions of thyroglobulin (Tg), sodium-iodide symporter (NIS), glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1), and somatostatin receptor 1 and 2A (SSTR1 and SSTR2A) were assessed, and associations between these expressions and radioiodine scan and ¹⁸F-FDG PET findings were evaluated.

Results

Of the 38 patients who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT, all patients with weak Tg expression had positive ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, while only 45 % of the patients with moderate or strong Tg expression showed positive uptake (p = 0.01). The proportion of patients with positive ¹⁸F-FDG uptake increased as the degree of Glut-1 expression with luminal accentuation increased. Of the 19 patients who underwent a radioiodine scan, the proportion with positive radioiodine uptake was greater among patients with strong NIS and SSTR2A expression than among patients expressing these markers at weak levels (p = 0.04 for all). All three patients with weak Tg expression were negative for radioiodine uptake.

Conclusion

The ¹⁸F-FDG uptakes of recurrent cervical nodes are related to strong Glut-1 expression with luminal accentuation and weak Tg expression, whereas radioiodine uptake is related to the strong expressions of NIS and SSTR2A.     

Diagnostic value of <Superscript>18</Superscript>F-FDG PET/CT in trauma patients with suspected chronic osteomyelitis

Purpose To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in trauma patients with suspected chronic osteomyelitis. Methods Thirty-three partial body ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed in 33 patients with trauma suspected of having chronic osteomyelitis. In 10 and 23 patients, infection was suspected in the axial and appendicular skeleton, respectively. In 18 patients, PET/CT was performed in the presence of metallic implants. Histopathology or bacteriological culture was used as the standard of reference. For statistical analysis, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated in relation to findings of the reference standard. Results Of 33 PET/CT scans, 17 were true positive, 13 true negative, two false positive and one false negative. Eighteen patients had chronic osteomyelitis and 15 had no osseous infection according to the reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was 94%, 87% and 91% for the whole group, 88%, 100% and 90% for the axial skeleton and 100%, 85% and 91% for the appendicular skeleton, respectively. Conclusion ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a highly sensitive and specific method for the evaluation of chronic infection in the axial and appendicular skeleton in patients with trauma. PET/CT allows precise anatomical localisation and characterisation of the infectious focus and demonstrates the extent of chronic osteomyelitis with a high degree of accuracy.     

18F-FDGPET／CT诊断腹膜转移瘤的临床价值

目的评价18F-脱氧葡萄糖（FDG）PET／CT在腹膜转移瘤诊断中的临床价值。方法回顾性分析22例有原发恶性肿瘤手术史或不明原因腹腔积液而临床高度怀疑腹膜转移的患者资料。所有病例均行18F—FDGPET／CT检查,经病理检查或临床随访证实。结果22例中,有18例18F-FDGPET／CT诊断阳性,其中16例确诊腹膜转移,2例确诊为腹腔结核;4例PET／CT诊断阴性,其中3例确诊为腹膜炎性病变,1例确诊为腹膜转移瘤。18F—FDGPET／CT诊断腹膜转移瘤的灵敏度为94．1％（16／17）,特异性为3／5,阳性预测值为88．9％（16／18）,阴性预测值为3／4,准确性为86．4％（18／22）。结论在诊断腹膜转移瘤方面,18F—FDGPET／CT是一种可靠的、准确性较高的无创性检查,有重要的临床应用价值。     

18F-FDG PET versus CT for evaluating the spleen during initial staging of lymphoma

The purpose of this study was to compare (18)F-FDG PET to CT for evaluating the spleen during the initial staging of lymphoma. METHODS: Seven patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma underwent (18)F-FDG PET and CT. Splenic uptake of (18)F-FDG, diffuse or focal, greater than hepatic uptake was interpreted as consistent with tumor. CT demonstrating a positive splenic index or focal hypodensities was classified as positive for tumor. PET and CT results were compared with final diagnoses, which were confirmed surgically for 6 patients and at autopsy for 1 patient. RESULTS: Five of 7 patients had lymphomatous involvement of the spleen. (18)F-FDG PET was true-positive for all 5 patients with splenic disease and true-negative for both patients without splenic disease. CT, in contrast, was true-positive for 4 of the 5 patients with splenic disease and false-positive for the 2 patients without splenic disease. The accuracies of (18)F-FDG PET and CT for evaluating the spleen were 100% and 57%, respectively. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET correctly identified all patients with and without splenic disease and was superior to CT for this purpose.     

Evaluation of head and neck cancer with 18F-FDG PET: a comparison with conventional methods

The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis and staging of primary and recurrent malignant head and neck tumours in comparison with conventional imaging methods [including ultrasonography, radiography, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)], physical examination, panendoscopy and biopsies in clinical routine. A total of 54 patients (13 female, 41 male, age 61.3+/-12 years) were investigated retrospectively. Three groups were formed. In group I, 18F-FDG PET was performed in 15 patients to detect unknown primary cancers. In group II, 24 studies were obtained for preoperative staging of proven head and neck cancer. In group III, 18F-FDG PET was used in 15 patients to monitor tumour recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. In all patients, imaging was obtained at 70 min after the intravenous administration of 180 MBq 18F-FDG. In 11 of the 15 patients in group I, the primary cancer could be found with 18F-FDG, yielding a detection rate of 73.3%. In 4 of the 15 patients, CT findings were also suggestive of the primary cancer but were nonetheless equivocal. In these patients, 18F-FDG showed increased 18F-FDG uptake by the primary tumour, which was confirmed by histology. One patient had recurrence of breast carcinoma that could not be detected with 18F-FDG PET, but was detected by CT. In three cases, the primary cancer could not be found with any imaging method. Among the 24 patients in group II investigated for staging purposes, 18F-FDG PET detected a total of 13 local and three distant lymph node metastases, whereas the conventional imaging methods detected only nine local and one distant lymph node metastases. The results of 18F-FDG PET led to an upstaging in 5/24 (20.8%) patients. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in 5/24 (20.8%). There was one false positive result using 18F-FDG PET. Among the 15 patients of group III with suspected recurrence after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy, 18F-FDG was true positive in 7/15 (46.6%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). The conventional imaging methods were true positive in 5/15 (33.3%) and true negative in 4/15 (26.6%). One false negative (6.6%) and three false positive findings (20%) on 18F-FDG PET were due to inflamed tissue. The conventional imaging methods were false positive in three (20%) and false negative in three cases (20%). It is concluded that in comparison to conventional diagnostic methods, 18F-FDG PET provides additional and clinically relevant information in the detection of primary and metastatic carcinomas as well as in the early detection of recurrent or persistent head and neck cancer after radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. 18F-FDG PET should therefore be performed early in clinical routine, usually before CT or MRI.     

Diagnostic accuracy of 18F-FDG PET in restaging patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma and elevated calcitonin levels.

Medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) is a rare endocrine tumor arising from the C-cells of the thyroid gland. Calcitonin is the principal serum tumor marker. A rising calcitonin level after total thyroidectomy for localized disease generally indicates residual, recurrent, or metastatic disease. The role of (18)F-FDG PET in MTC remains somewhat unclear. We reviewed our own experience with (18)F-FDG PET in postthyroidectomy MTC patients with elevated calcitonin. METHODS: From our database, we identified patients with suspected residual, recurrent, or metastatic MTC and elevated calcitonin who had been referred for (18)F-FDG PET between January 2000 and October 2005. (18)F-FDG PET findings were classified as positive or negative on the basis of visual interpretation of the scan. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) were also calculated. The (18)F-FDG PET findings were verified by histopathologic examination, when available, or other imaging studies and clinical follow-up. Any negative (18)F-FDG PET result was considered false-negative. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent a total of 38 (18)F-FDG PET studies. Calcitonin levels ranged from 106 to 541,000 pg/mL (median, 7,260 pg/mL). There were 23 true-positive, 1 false-positive, and 14 false-negative (18)F-FDG PET scans, yielding an overall sensitivity of 62%. There was no true-positive finding when calcitonin levels were below 509 pg/mL (n = 5). Using an arbitrary cutoff of 1,000 pg/mL, we found that the sensitivity in scans with calcitonin levels greater than 1,000 pg/mL increased to 78% (21/27; 95% confidence interval, 58%-91%). The mean SUV of all lesions with (18)F-FDG uptake was 5.3 +/- 3.2 (range, 2.0-15.9). Among the 14 patients with false-negative (18)F-FDG PET findings, 8 had concurrent anatomic imaging studies and only 2 of these had positive findings. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET can detect residual, recurrent, or metastatic MTC with a reasonable sensitivity of 78% when the calcitonin level is above 1,000 pg/mL but appears of limited use if the calcitonin level is below 500 pg/mL.     

Is 18F-FDG PET/CT useful for imaging and management of patients with suspected occult recurrence of cancer?

Rising serum tumor markers may be associated with negative imaging in the presence of cancer. CT and (18)F-FDG PET may yield incongruent results in the assessment of tumor recurrence. The present study evaluates the incremental role of (18)F-FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and management of cancer patients with increasing levels of tumor markers as the sole indicator of potential recurrence after initial successful treatment. METHODS: Thirty-six cancer patients with increasing levels of tumor markers during follow-up and negative CT underwent (18)F-FDG PET/CT, which showed 111 sites of increased tracer uptake. PET/CT was compared with PET results on a site-based analysis for characterization of (18)F-FDG foci and on a patient-based analysis for diagnosis of recurrence. The clinical impact of PET/CT on further patient management was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty patients (83%) had recurrence in 85 malignant sites (77%). For the site-based analysis, PET had a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 96%, 50%, 85%, 85%, and 82%, respectively, as compared with the performance indices of PET/CT of 100%, 89%, 97%, 97%, and 100%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference between the specificity (P < 0.05) and accuracy (P < 0.001) of PET and PET/CT for precise characterization of suspected lesions. For the patient-based analysis, PET had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 93%, 50%, and 86%, respectively, as compared with PET/CT with values of 93%, 67%, and 89%, respectively (P = not significant). PET/CT was the single modality that directed further management and treatment planning in 12 patients (33%). CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that PET/CT may improve the accuracy of occult cancer detection and further lead to management changes in patients with increasing levels of tumor markers as the sole suspicion of recurrent malignancy.     

18F-FDG PET in evaluation of adrenal lesions in patients with lung cancer.

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of PET with (18)F-FDG in differentiating benign from metastatic adrenal masses detected on CT or MRI scans of patients with lung cancer. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed (18)F-FDG PET scans of patients with lung cancer who were found to have an adrenal mass on CT or MRI scans. One hundred thirteen adrenal masses (75 unilateral and 19 bilateral; size range, 0.8-4.7 cm) were evaluated in 94 patients. PET findings were interpreted as positive if the (18)F-FDG uptake of the adrenal mass was greater than or equal to that of the liver. PET findings were interpreted as negative if the (18)F-FDG uptake of the adrenal mass was less than that of the liver. All studies were reviewed independently by 3 nuclear medicine physicians, and the results were then correlated with clinical follow-up or biopsy results when available. RESULTS: PET findings were positive in 71 adrenal masses. Sixty-seven of these were eventually considered to be metastatic adrenal disease. In the remaining 4, no changes in lesion size were noted on follow-up examinations. PET findings were negative in 42 adrenal masses, of which 37 eventually proved to be benign. Among the 5 adrenal masses that were false-negative, one was a large necrotic metastasis; 1 was a 2.4-cm lesion with central hemorrhaging, and the remaining 3 were lesions of less than 11 mm. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting metastatic disease were 93%, 90%, and 92%, respectively. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG PET is an accurate, noninvasive technique for differentiating benign from metastatic adrenal lesions detected on CT or MRI in patients with lung cancer. In addition, PET has the advantage of assessing the primary cancer sites and detecting other metastases.